DOCSLIB.ORG

Disturbance-Based Silviculture for Habitat Diversity Thom 2020.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Disturbance-Based Silviculture for Habitat Diversity Thom 2020.Pdf Forest Ecology and Management 469 (2020) 118132 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Disturbance-based silviculture for habitat diversification: Effects on forest T structure, dynamics, and carbon storage ⁎ Dominik Thoma,b,c,d, William S. Keetona,b, a Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, 81 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA b Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, 617 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05405, USA c Institute of Silviculture, Department of Forest- and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU) Vienna, Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria d Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management Group, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Disturbance-based silviculture is of increasing interest as an approach to provide multiple ecosystem services and Silviculture with Birds in Mind beta diversity in habitat conditions. One such approach increasingly employed in the eastern U.S. is a set of CARBON storage forestry practices developed to diversify forested bird habitats, called Silviculture with Birds in Mind (SBM). Disturbance-based forestry While strongly appealing to many private landowners, empirical data have not yet been reported regarding the Forest management effects of SBM treatments on forest structure and dynamics and how they compare to natural disturbances. Forest structure Moreover, the potential of bird-oriented silviculture like SBM to enhance co-benefits, for instance, by retaining Habitat Beta diversity high carbon stocks in managed forests, has not been investigated. The objectives of our study were thus (i) to Silviculture analyze the effects of SBM treatments on forests and compare them with natural disturbances, and (ii)toassess Wind disturbance the co-benefits of multiple habitat indicators and carbon storage within three years of silvicultural treatmentin mature northern hardwood-conifer forests. We derived 14 stand structural variables as well as carbon storage from 217 SBM inventory plots, and compared them with the effects of intermediate-severity wind disturbance using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Subsequently, we applied multi-hierarchical Bayesian models to investigate SBM treatment effects on aboveground carbon storage, as well as on four key habitat indicators. We also used Bayesianmodels to derive the relationships between habitat indicators and carbon storage. SBM treatments created a diversity of post-harvest stand conditions and, while having lower values for some structural characteristics in comparison to controls, significantly enhanced the variation in individual structural elements. Moreover, the treatments were closer in ordinal space to the irregular structure associated with in- termediate-severity wind disturbance than untreated control plots. However, the NMDS indicated that SBM treatments did not fully approximate partial wind disturbances. Carbon storage was positively associated with stand structural complexity. Disturbance-based approaches like SBM help diversify habitat conditions and we expect these effects to be- come more pronounced as stands respond to the treatments over time. If applied more broadly, treatments targeted at diversifying habitats would also help maintain high carbon stocking at landscape scales. However, as the treatments do not fully emulate the region’s natural disturbance regime, we propose widening the portfolio of multi-cohort, retention, and gap-based silvicultural approaches in landscape-scale management. 1. Introduction ‘disturbance-based’, ‘nature-oriented’, ‘ecological’, ‘close-to-nature’, ‘multi-functional’ or ‘retention’ forestry (Puettmann et al., 2015), share Recent decades have witnessed growing interest in the development the objective of perpetuating the full range of stand scale structures and of silvicultural approaches designed to mimic natural disturbances in landscape patterns which organisms require, assuming adaptation to many parts of the world (Brang et al., 2014; Franklin et al., 2007; the natural disturbance regimes driving stand and landscape dynamics Seymour et al., 2002). These approaches, often referred to as (Franklin et al., 2007). A further goal is to provide a broader array of ⁎ Corresponding author at: Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, 81 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA. E-mail address: [email protected] (W.S. Keeton). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118132 Received 11 December 2019; Received in revised form 31 March 2020; Accepted 1 April 2020 0378-1127/ © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. D. Thom and W.S. Keeton Forest Ecology and Management 469 (2020) 118132 habitat conditions and ecosystem services than may be associated with breeding population in the region; and (iv) are relatively easy to practices, such as short rotation industrial forestry or over reliance on identify by non-professional observers. Habitat conditions supporting even-aged management, that tend to simplify and homogenize stand feeding and breeding of different species include, for instance, irregu- and landscape structures (Kuuluvainen and Grenfell, 2012; Puettmann larly sized and structured canopy gaps with early successional vegeta- and Tappeiner, 2014). Some disturbance-based silvicultural systems tion (e.g., American woodcock (Scolopax minor [Gmel.])), tall trees were specifically designed to encourage both stand structural com- (e.g., scarlet tanager (Piranga olivacea [Gmel.])), and downed (e.g., plexity and landscape patch diversity (Keeton, 2006; Bauhus et al., Canada warbler (Cardellina canadensis [L.])) and standing deadwood 2009; Stanturf et al., 2014). These approaches have great potential to (e.g., yellow-bellied sapsucker (Sphyrapicus varius [L.])) (Hagenbuch balance the interests of society in biodiversity and the supply of mul- et al., 2012). SBM treatments have been designed to collectively create tiple ecosystem services. For instance, management for structural these habitat conditions by mimicking disturbances of different seve- complexity in mixed northern hardwood forests of eastern North rities and sizes. America has been found to increase elements of late-successional bio- Some of the silvicultural approaches investigated here, such as diversity (Dove and Keeton, 2015; Gottesman and Keeton, 2017; variable density thinning (in SBM termed “variable retention thinning” McKenny et al., 2006) and carbon storage (Ford and Keeton, 2017) or VRT), have been employed in many different forest systems in North while, at the same time, providing wood products from timber harvests America (Carey, 2003; Stanturf et al., 2014), but have been poorly (Nunery and Keeton, 2010). studied in the eastern U.S. Others are better understood in terms of Disturbance-based approaches have struggled to gain traction implications for long-term stand development trajectories (see, for ex- within the forestry community in the eastern United States (Fahey ample, Halpin et al., 2017) but have not been assessed relative to other et al., 2018). However, recently interest has developed around silvi- disturbance based approaches. Though the subject of on-going mon- cultural approaches specifically tailored to promote a diversity of bird itoring, effects of the SBM treatments on bird populations are still lar- habitats (Sallabanks and Arnett, 2005), reflecting the nation-wide in- gely uncertain. Stand improvement thinning, a variant of one of the terest among non-industrial private landowners in birds as a primary SBM treatments, was successful at fostering songbird occupancy and motivation for owning forestland (Butler et al., 2007). A leading ex- abundance (Rankin and Perlut, 2015). In addition, Nareff et al. (2019) ample is a set of approaches collectively called Silviculture with Birds in found that territory densities and population abundances for Cerulean Mind (SBM), currently being demonstrated on a variety of ownerships Warblers responded positively to a range of retention-based, bird-or- in northeastern North America (Hagenbuch et al., 2012). Variants of iented silvicultural practices in Central Appalachian hardwoods. How- SBM are under development for other regions of North America as well, ever, the success of bird-oriented treatments at emulating natural dis- such as the U.S. Southeast and Pacific Northwest (see, for example, turbances, and their ability to achieve management objectives other Wood et al., 2013). In the Northeast, six innovative silvicultural treat- than bird habitat, have not been previously assessed. This also holds ments adapted to three stand development conditions have been pro- true for associations between silviculturally enhanced bird habitat di- moted, of which five had been implemented at the time of this study. versity and ecosystem services such as carbon storage. The treatments are largely based on disturbance-oriented concepts (see In this study, we quantify the co-benefits of disturbance-based Frelich and Lorimer, 1991; Seymour et al., 2002; Keeton, 2006; treatments oriented towards birds in terms of their effects on habitat Franklin et al., 2007), such as gap creation, legacy tree retention, conditions, stand structure associated with natural disturbance impacts, variable density thinning, and dead wood enhancement, and are ap- and carbon storage,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dynamics and Disturbance in an Old-Growth Forest Remnant In
    DYNAMICS AND DISTURBANCE IN AN OLD-GROWTH FOREST REMNANT IN WESTERN OHIO Thesis Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Science in Biology By Sean Michael Goins UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio August, 2012 DYNAMICS AND DISTURBANCE IN AN OLD-GROWTH FOREST REMNANT IN WESTERN OHIO Name: Goins, Sean Michael APPROVED BY: __________________________________________ Ryan W. McEwan, Ph.D. Committee Chair Assistant Professor __________________________________________ M. Eric Benbow, Ph.D. Committee Member Assistant Professor __________________________________________ Mark G. Nielsen, Ph.D. Committee Member Associate Professor ii ABSTRACT DYNAMICS AND DISTURBANCE IN AN OLD-GROWTH FOREST REMNANT IN WESTERN OHIO Name: Goins, Sean Michael University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Ryan W. McEwan Forest communities are dynamic through time, reacting to shifts in disturbance and climate regimes. A widespread community shift has been witnessed in many forests of eastern North America wherein oak (Quercus spp.) populations are decreasing while maple (Acer spp.) populations are increasing. Altered fire regimes over the last century are thought to be the primary driver of oak-to-maple community shifts; however, the influence of other non-equilibrium processes on this community shift remains under- explored. Our study sought to determine the community structure and disturbance history of an old-growth forest remnant in an area of western Ohio where fires were historically uncommon. To determine community structure, abundance of woody species was measured within 32 plots at 4 canopy strata and dendrochronology was used to determine the relative age-structure of the forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth World Forestry Congress
    Proceedings of the Fifth World Forestry Congress VOLUME 1 RE University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America August 29September 10, 1960 The President of the United States of America DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Patron Fifth World Forestry Congress III Contents VOLUME 1 Page Chapter1.Summary and Recommendations of the Congress 1 Chapter 2.Planning for the Congress 8 Chapter3.Local Arrangements for the Congress 11 Chapter 4.The Congress and its Program 15 Chapter 5.Opening Ceremonies 19 Chapter6. Plenary Sessions 27 Chapter 7.Special Congress Events 35 Chapitre 1.Sommaire et recommandations du Congrès 40 Chapitre 2.Preparation des plans en vue du Congrès 48 Chapitre 3.Arrangements locaux en vue du Congrès 50 Chapitre 4.Le Congrès et son programme 51 Chapitre 5.Cérémonies d'ouverture 52 Chapitre 6.Seances plénières 59 Chapitre 7.Activités spéciales du Congrès 67 CapItullo1. Sumario y Recomendaciones del Congreso 70 CapItulo 2.Planes para el Congreso 78 CapItulo 3.Actividades Locales del Congreso 80 CapItulo 4.El Congreso y su Programa 81 CapItulo 5.Ceremonia de Apertura 81 CapItulo 6.Sesiones Plenarias 88 CapItulo 7.Actos Especiales del Congreso 96 Chapter8. Congress Tours 99 Chapter9.Appendices 118 Appendix A.Committee Memberships 118 Appendix B.Rules of Procedure 124 Appendix C.Congress Secretariat 127 Appendix D.Machinery Exhibitors Directory 128 Appendix E.List of Financial Contributors 130 Appendix F.List of Participants 131 First General Session 141 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Second General Session 171 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Iv Contents Page Third General Session 189 Progress in World Forestry Progrés accomplis dans le monde en sylviculture Adelantos en la Silvicultura Mundial Section I.Silviculture and Management 241 Sessions A and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Old-Growth Forests
    Pacific Northwest Research Station NEW FINDINGS ABOUT OLD-GROWTH FORESTS I N S U M M A R Y ot all forests with old trees are scientifically defined for many centuries. Today’s old-growth forests developed as old growth. Among those that are, the variations along multiple pathways with many low-severity and some Nare so striking that multiple definitions of old-growth high-severity disturbances along the way. And, scientists forests are needed, even when the discussion is restricted to are learning, the journey matters—old-growth ecosystems Pacific coast old-growth forests from southwestern Oregon contribute to ecological diversity through every stage of to southwestern British Columbia. forest development. Heterogeneity in the pathways to old- growth forests accounts for many of the differences among Scientists understand the basic structural features of old- old-growth forests. growth forests and have learned much about habitat use of forests by spotted owls and other species. Less known, Complexity does not mean chaos or a lack of pattern. Sci- however, are the character and development of the live and entists from the Pacific Northwest (PNW) Research Station, dead trees and other plants. We are learning much about along with scientists and students from universities, see the structural complexity of these forests and how it leads to some common elements and themes in the many pathways. ecological complexity—which makes possible their famous The new findings suggest we may need to change our strat- biodiversity. For example, we are gaining new insights into egies for conserving and restoring old-growth ecosystems. canopy complexity in old-growth forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing for Late-Successional/Old-Growth Characteristics in Northern Hardwood-Conifer Forests William S
    Forest Ecology and Management 235 (2006) 129–142 www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Managing for late-successional/old-growth characteristics in northern hardwood-conifer forests William S. Keeton * Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, United States Received 19 March 2006; received in revised form 2 August 2006; accepted 2 August 2006 Abstract In the northern hardwood region of North America managing for late-successional forest habitats and functions is an important element of ecosystem management. This study tests the hypothesis that uneven-aged practices can be modified to accelerate rates of late-successional forest development. An approach, termed ‘‘structural complexity enhancement’’ (SCE), is compared against conventional uneven-aged systems modified to increase post-harvest structural retention. Experimental treatments, including controls, were applied to 2 ha units and replicated at two multi- aged northern hardwood forests in Vermont, USA. Structural objectives include vertically differentiated canopies, elevated large snag and downed log densities, variable horizontal density (including small gaps), and re-allocation of basal area to larger diameter classes. The latter objective is achieved, in part, by cutting to a rotated sigmoid diameter distribution. This is generated from a basal area (34 m2 haÀ1) and tree size (90 cm dbh) indicative of old-growth structure. Forest structure data have been collected over 2 years pre-treatment and 3 years post-treatment. Fifty-year simulations of stand development were run in NE-TWIGS and FVS comparing treatment and no treatment scenarios. Simulations also tested the sensitivity of large tree development to prescription parameters. Leaf area index retention was spatially variable but significantly (P < 0.001) greater under SCE (91%) compared to conventional treatments (75%).
    [Show full text]
  • Sass Forestecomgt 2018.Pdf
    Forest Ecology and Management 419–420 (2018) 31–41 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Lasting legacies of historical clearcutting, wind, and salvage logging on old- T growth Tsuga canadensis-Pinus strobus forests ⁎ Emma M. Sassa, , Anthony W. D'Amatoa, David R. Fosterb a Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA b Harvard Forest, Harvard University, 324 N Main St, Petersham, MA 01366, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Disturbance events affect forest composition and structure across a range of spatial and temporal scales, and Coarse woody debris subsequent forest development may differ after natural, anthropogenic, or compound disturbances. Following Compound disturbance large, natural disturbances, salvage logging is a common and often controversial management practice in many Forest structure regions of the globe. Yet, while the short-term impacts of salvage logging have been studied in many systems, the Large, infrequent natural disturbance long-term effects remain unclear. We capitalized on over eighty years of data following an old-growth Tsuga Pine-hemlock forests canadensis-Pinus strobus forest in southwestern New Hampshire, USA after the 1938 hurricane, which severely Pit and mound structures damaged forests across much of New England. To our knowledge, this study provides the longest evaluation of salvage logging impacts, and it highlights developmental trajectories for Tsuga canadensis-Pinus strobus forests under a variety of disturbance histories. Specifically, we examined development from an old-growth condition in 1930 through 2016 across three different disturbance histories: (1) clearcut logging prior to the 1938 hurricane with some subsequent damage by the hurricane (“logged”), (2) severe damage from the 1938 hurricane (“hurricane”), and (3) severe damage from the hurricane followed by salvage logging (“salvaged”).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Ecology and Management 267 (2012) 271-283
    Forest Ecology and Management 267 (2012) 271-283 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal hom epage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Analyzing wildfire exposure and source-sink relationships on a fire prone forest landscape a, a b c Alan A. Ager *, Nicole M. Vaillant , Mark A. Finney , Haiganoush K. Preisler a USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center, 3160 NE 3rd Street, Prineville, OR 97754, USA b USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5775 Hwy. 10 West, Missoula, MT 59808, USA C USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 800 Buchannan Street, Albany, CA 9471 0, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTR ACT Article history: We used simulation modeling to analyze wildfire exposure to social and ecological values on a 0,6 mil­ Received 9 August 2011 lion ha national forest in central Oregon, USA. We simulated 50,000 wildfires that replicated recent fire Received in revised form 13 November 2011 events in the area and generated detailed maps of burn probability (BP) and fire intensity distributions. Accepted 14 November 2011 We also recorded the ignition locations and size of each simulated fire and used these outputs to con­ Available online 8 January 2012 struct a fire source-sink ratio as the ratio of fire size to burn probability. Fire behavior was summarized for federal land management designations, including biological conservation reserves, recreational sites, Keywords: managed forest, and wildland urban interface. Burn probability from the simulations ranged from Wildfire simulation Wildfire risk 0.00091 to 0.026 within the study area (mean = 0.0023), and exhibited substantial variation among Conservation biology and within land designations.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Study Guide
    Forestry Study Guide Learning Objectives: Students should be able to: 1. Identify common trees without a key. 2. Identify specific or unusual species of trees or shrubs through the use of a key. 3. Understand how wildlife habitat relates to: forest communities, forest species, forest age structure, snags and den trees, availability of food and cover, and riparian zones. 4. Understand basic forest management concepts. 5. Be familiar with use of a diameter tape and other forestry tools. 6. Understand the benefits of trees in urban/suburban settings and the factors affecting their health and survival. Key Topics 1. Basic Forestry Knowledge; such as tree identification, silvics of common trees, tree measurement and tool use, and interaction of forests and environment. 2. Forest Ecology; such as the observation and identification of forest types, observing and describing forest stand structure, observing and describing site variables that affect tree species, and observing and identifying the stages of forest succession. 3. Silviculture Systems - such as describing the difference between harvesting and silvicultural systems, describe the difference between the goal of thinning and final harvest, describe the purpose of common silvicultural systems, and describe the management practices and their purpose. 4. Viewing Ecosystems; such as the observation of how trees and forests impact soil development, wildlife habitat, public places, agriculture, and on water quality. 5. Urban Forestry; such as the recognition of the value of trees in the urban landscape, choosing the correct species for specific locations, energy conservation through three plantings, urban wildlife benefits from tree plantings methods, proper tree care and maintenance, including wise choices in pest and disease control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Increasing Drought on Forest Dynamics, Structure, and Biodiversity in the United States
    Global Change Biology (2016) 22, 2329–2352, doi: 10.1111/gcb.13160 SPECIAL FEATURE The impacts of increasing drought on forest dynamics, structure, and biodiversity in the United States JAMES S. CLARK1 , LOUIS IVERSON2 , CHRISTOPHER W. WOODALL3 ,CRAIGD.ALLEN4 , DAVID M. BELL5 , DON C. BRAGG6 , ANTHONY W. D’AMATO7 ,FRANKW.DAVIS8 , MICHELLE H. HERSH9 , INES IBANEZ10, STEPHEN T. JACKSON11, STEPHEN MATTHEWS12, NEIL PEDERSON13, MATTHEW PETERS14,MARKW.SCHWARTZ15, KRISTEN M. WARING16 andNIKLAUS E. ZIMMERMANN17 1Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA, 2Forest Service, Northern Research Station 359 Main Road, Delaware, OH 43015, USA, 3Forest Service 1992 Folwell Avenue,Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA, 4U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center Jemez Mountains Field Station, Los Alamos, NM 87544, USA, 5Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA, 6Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Monticello, AR 71656, USA, 7Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, 04E Aiken Center, 81 Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT 05405, USA, 8Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA, 9Department of Biology, Sarah Lawrence College, New York, NY 10708, USA, 10School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 2546 Dana Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA, 11U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Climate Science Center and Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1064 E. Lowell
    [Show full text]
  • Over 200 Top US Climate and Forest Scientists Urge
    For Immediate Release Over 200 Top U.S. Climate and Forest Scientists Urge Congress: Protect Forests to Mitigate Climate Crisis 13 May 2020 Contact: William Moomaw, Ph.D. ([email protected]; 617-335-3994) Chad Hanson, Ph.D. ([email protected]; 530-273-9290) Dominick DellaSala, Ph.D. ([email protected]; 541-621-7223) As multiple current legislative proposals attempt to shoehorn measures that would increase logging, or increase funding for logging, into COVID-19 stimulus packages, over 200 top U.S. climate and forest scientists are now asking Congressional leaders to avoid using the pandemic emergency as a means for stripping away forest protections and promoting logging. In a historic and unprecedented letter sent to Congress today, the scientists conclude that, in order to avoid the worst impacts of the climate crisis, moving beyond fossil fuel consumption is not enough, and we must also increase forest protections and shift away from energy-intensive and greenhouse-gas polluting wood consumption. The scientists note that annual carbon emissions from logging in U.S. forests are comparable to emissions from the residential and commercial sectors combined. They ask legislators to reject false climate solutions that promote forest biomass logging (removal and incineration of trees for energy production) under the guise of “climate-friendly” or “carbon neutral” energy or logging for cross-laminated timber (CLT) and other wood products under the guise of carbon storage. Most of the carbon in trees is removed from forests when they are logged and quickly ends up in the atmosphere or in landfills, they caution. The scientists also note that logging, including commercial “thinning,” can often increase fire intensity in forests, while damaging soils and removing vital nutrients, which undermines the carbon sequestration and storage capacity of forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Stewardship Series 3: Forest Ecology
    PUBLICATION 8233 FOREST STEWARDSHIP SERIES 3 Forest Ecology LAURIE LITMAN, InfoWright, Stockton, CA; GARY NAKAMURA, UCCE Forestry Specialist, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley A forest is more than trees. It is also the shrubs, wildflowers, and grasses; the animals that depend on and live among these plants; the soil in which the plants grow; the UNIVERSITY OF dead trees and plants; the stream that flows through it; the insects, fungi, bacteria, CALIFORNIA and organisms you cannot readily see; and the climate. In short, a forest is an eco- Division of Agriculture system. An ecosystem is simply a specific area of the earth that includes all the liv- and Natural Resources ing organisms and nonliving components of the environment that interact within its http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu boundaries. An ecosystem can be any size, such as a log, pond, field, forest, or the whole earth’s biosphere. Objective It is useful to understand and manage your forest as an ecosystem Understand the structure and because all the components influence one another: for example, if you functions of forested ecosystems want certain tree species in your forest, you may have to manage the in California. competing vegetation. You cannot control certain aspects of the ecosys- tem such as climate; you must learn to live within its constraints of Competencies temperature and precipitation. In many cases the dates of last and first • Identify the forest ecosystem(s) on your frost control the growing season, the types of plants you can grow, and property. the productivity of your forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Sustainable Forest Management Using Six Concepts In
    Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 29:79–108, 2010 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1054-9811 print/1540-756X online DOI: 10.1080/10549810903463494 WJSF1054-98111540-756XJournalImplementing of Sustainable Forestry,Forestry Vol. 29, No. 1, January-March 2009: pp. 0–0 Sustainable Forest Management Using Six Concepts in an Adaptive Management Framework ForestB. C. Foster in an etAdaptive al. Management Framework BRYAN C. FOSTER1, DEANE WANG1, WILLIAM S. KEETON1, and MARK S. ASHTON2 1Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA 2School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Certification and principles, criteria and indicators (PCI) describe desired ends for sustainable forest management (SFM) but do not address potential means to achieve those ends. As a result, forest owners and managers participating in certification and employing PCI as tools to achieving SFM may be doing so inefficiently: achiev- ing results by trial-and-error rather than by targeted management practices; dispersing resources away from priority objectives; and passively monitoring outcomes rather than actively establishing quantitative goals. In this literature review, we propose six con- cepts to guide SFM implementation. These concepts include: Best Management Practices (BMPs)/Reduced Impact Logging (RIL), biodiversity conservation, forest protection, multi-scale planning, participatory forestry, and sustained forest production. We place Downloaded By: [Keeton, W. S.] At: 16:17 8 March 2010 these concepts within an iterative decision-making framework of planning, implementation, and assessment, and provide brief definitions of and practices delimited by each concept. A case study describing SFM in the neo-tropics illustrates a potential application of our six concepts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Insights from Long-Term Research Plots in Tropical and Temperate Forests
    Ecological Insights from Long-term Research Plots in Tropical and Temperate Forests Organized Oral Session 40 was co-organized by Amy Wolf, Stuart Davies, and Richard Condit, and held on 6 August 2009 during the 94th ES A Annual Meeting in Albuquerque, New Mexico. An International Network of Forest Research Sites This session was devoted to findings from an international network of long-term forest dynamics plots, providing some of the first comparisons between the tropical and temperate study areas. Whereas most ecologists recognize the importance of long-term research (Callahan 1984, Likens 1989, Magnuson 1990, Hobbie et al. 2003, and others), large-scale projects like this one are rare. The global network of forest dynamics plots has expanded since its origin in the early 1980s, yet research at the plots has remained integrated due to a combination of individual scientists' efforts and institutional commitments from the Center for Tropical Forest Science (CTFS, <www.ctfs.si.edu> of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University (Hubbell and Foster 1983, Condit 1995). Today, 26 large plots have been established in tropical or subtropical forests of Central and South America, Africa, Asia, and Oceania, along with 8 recently added temperate forest plots. A standard protocol (Condit 1998) is followed at all sites, including the marking, mapping, and measuring of all trees and shrubs with stem diameters >1 cm. Reports October 2009 519 Reports An underlying objective of the ESA session was to illustrate how an understanding of forest dynamics can contribute to long-term strategies of sustainable forest management in a changing global environment.
    [Show full text]