Strengthening Pacific Fragile States: the Marshall Islands Example Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strengthening Pacific Fragile States: the Marshall Islands Example Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2009 Pacific Studies Series Strengthening Pacifi c Fragile States THE MARSHALL ISLANDS EXAMPLE Strengthening Pacific Fragile St1 1 04/11/2009 2:13:41 PM i Strengthening Paci\ c Fragile States THE MARSHALL ISLANDS EXAMPLE ii Strengthening Pacifi c Fragile States © 2009 Asian Development Bank All rights reserved. Published 2009. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-971-561-853-3 Publication Stock No. RPS090280 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Strengthening pacific fragile states: The Marshall Islands example Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2009. 1. Development assistance 2. Marshall Islands I. Asian Development Bank Th e views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not necessarily refl ect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgements as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ADB encourages printing or copying information exclusively for personal and noncommercial use with proper acknowledgement of ADB. Users are restricted from reselling, redistributing, or creating derivative works for commercial purposes without the express, written consent of ADB. PHOTO CREDIT: cover on photo by Marshall Islands Visitors Authority NOTES In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Marshall Islands ends on 30 September. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fi scal year ends, e.g., FY2008 ends on 30 September 2008. 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444 Fax + 63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org iii Contents Abbreviations iv Foreword v Introduction and Background 1 Strategy and Program 4 Lessons So Far 6 A Growing Demand for Change 9 New Approaches to Building Demand 11 Where Next? 15 iv Strengthening Pacifi c Fragile States Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank NGO nongovernment organization RMI Th e Republic of the Marshall Islands v Foreword espite, and possibly because of, high levels of international assistance, the economy of the Republic of the Marshall Islands has failed to grow since independence in 1979, other than in temporary response to aid-assisted Dgovernment expenditure. As a result of the lack of sustained increase in domestic economic activity, Marshall Islands society is now noticeably in decline. Among other lessons of past development assistance described herein, a strong message is that development demanded in the Pacifi c matters as much as development supplied. Development demand consists of building robust constitu- encies which support change and reform to improve their social and economic well-being. Th e development experience of the Marshall Islands also has some important implications for other Pacifi c island countries. While Pacifi c islands countries are diverse, they face common risks. Common approaches, guidelines, and principles can be applied but their eventual application will have to be adapted to the individual circumstances of each country. Whether by family, village, island, ethnic group or wantok (language group), Pacifi c island countries are often highly factionalized and this presents a serious challenge to development. Over the past 5 years, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) has been using a new approach with a view to learning how best to build on the increasing demand for improvement in governance in the Marshall Islands, and also with a view to replicating some of the same approaches elsewhere in the region appropriately modifi ed to their local conditions. Th e approach is based on intensive stakeholder participation and situation analyses, dissemination of information, and confi dential, informal retreats, using highly skilled facilitators and domestic consultants. Positive development results have taken place, indicating success of the approach. However, much remains to be done and the approach needs to be improved cumulatively as more experience is gained in the process of implementation. Signifi cant questions remain. What is the nature of demand for good governance and for better delivery of public and private goods and services? How strong is this demand? Who is driving demand? And can this demand be built on? Building demand takes time and requires a sensitive approach. Overcoming factionalism requires institutionalizing a broad based process of consultation and participation. Strong donor coordination and partnership will be crucial to building demand. S. Hafeez Rahman Director General Pacifi c Department vi Strengthening Pacifi c Fragile States 1 Introduction and Background strong state reinforces investment yield, whether this results from public or private sector investment. Th e development needs of a weak state must diff er from those of a strong state. Th e fragile states of the APacifi c are not the dynamic societies of Asia.1 Th ese may sound like obvious statements but the special needs of Pacifi c fragile states have not been apparent in earlier approaches to development in the Pacifi c region. Current Asian Development Bank (ADB) regional and country strategies and programs diff er from those of earlier years. Emphasis on maintaining project loan port- folios has been lessened and replaced by an emphasis on strengthening state operations, including testing and strengthening the demand for reform, and engaging civil society in development decisions. Th e shift is toward greater participation in development with the aim of building demand for good gov- ernance and reform to support performance-oriented delivery of public and private goods and services. Th e economic performance of the 14 ADB developing member coun- tries in the Pacifi c has been mixed.2 Many are showing social and economic stagnation if not decline.3 Today there is much talk of failed and fragile states in the region, a situation that was not anticipated when these states became independent some 20−30 years ago. 1 Th ere are many defi nitions of fragile states. A fairly common one refers to those states “where the government cannot, or will not, deliver core functions to the majority of its people, including the poor.” Department for International Development. January 2005. Why We Need to Work More Ef- fectively in Fragile States. London. 2 Th e 14 Pacifi c developing member countries are: the Cook Islands, the Fiji Islands, Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu. 3 ADB. 2005. Responding to the Priorities of the Poor: A Pacifi c Strategy for the Asian Development Bank 2005–2009. Manila. 2 Strengthening Pacifi c Fragile States Over the past 8 years, ADB has funded studies of poverty and hardship in the region that included recording “the voices of the poor” (footnote 3). Th ese studies produced very clear and consistent development directions, i.e., for governments to (i) improve access to and quality of delivery of essential public services, (ii) create an environment in which the private sector can ex- pand commercial activities and jobs, and (iii) boost standards of governance.4 Th ese priorities amount to the development of modern state institutions and private markets, but are still being cited some 20–30 years after independence. Combined, the priorities amount to a strategy to strengthen fragile states. ADB’s current Pacifi c Strategy (footnote 3) embraced these same priorities and its midterm review reaffi rmed them.5 In comparing ADB’s regional strategy with those of other major regional development partners, the midterm review concluded that “there is now broad alignment between the Pacifi c Plan (of the Pacifi c Forum) and the regional plans of ADB, AusAID [Australian Agency for International Development], NZAID [New Zealand Agency for International Development] and the World Bank.” Th e Pacifi c needs a development-partner response to the needs of fragile states. Pacifi c states appear to be remarkably resistant to reform and institu- tional improvement. Some states have for decades repeatedly received the same advice on tax reform, land registration, improving the business environment, merit-based public sector–personnel management, improving foreign invest- ment regimes, and state-owned enterprise reform. Th e struggle to develop modern states in the Pacifi c has, therefore, also led some development partners to question not only priority needs but also approaches to development as- sistance.6 How can the small, closely knit societies and polities of the Pacifi c adapt and adopt the required reforms to strengthen state operations? After 20–30 years of repeated development assistance, the issue is now not so much what is best policy and best institutional arrangements but how can the Pacifi c reform and redress evident decline? And how can any concerned, external, development agency best assist change? Th e Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) joined ADB in 1990. Since then it has received 12 loans for 11 projects, totaling $78.1 million, and 49 technical assistance programs and projects totaling $18.8 million. Eight of the 11 projects were project loans (education, fi sheries, health, water, and transport) while three were policy-based program loans in support of public sector reform and structural adjustment. Th e other loan was for emergency typhoon rehabilitation. Th e technical assistance has covered a wide range of sectors and thematic issues, including building capacity in development bank- ing, tourism management, environmental protection, and economic policy 4 Abbott, D. and S. Pollard. 2004. Hardship and Poverty in the Pacifi c. Manila: ADB. 5 ADB. 2008. Working in Fragile Environments: A Midterm Review of the Pacifi c Strategy (2005–2009).
Recommended publications
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 265 073 SE 046 374 TITLE Directory Of
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 265 073 SE 046 374 TITLE Directory of UNFPA-Funded and Unesco-Assisted Population Education Prcjects in Asir and the Pacific. INSTITUTION United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Bangkok (Thailand). Regional Office for Education in Asia and the Pacific. REPORT NO BICP/84/OPE/584-1500 PUB DATE 84 NOTE 85p. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Directories/Catalogs (132) EDRS PRICE M701/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult NO ation; Curriculum Development; *Educational Objectives; Elementary Secondary Education; *Instructional Materials; *Material Development; Nonformal Education; Nonschool Educational Programs; *Population Education; Program Content; *Program Descriptions; Program Evaluation IDENTIFIERS *Asia; *Pacific Region; UNESCO ABSTRACT The purpose of this directory is to list by country, the UNFPA-funded and Unesco-assisted organizations engaged in population education in Asia and the Pacific. It includes information on the scope of population education programs in the region as well as activities and accomplishments in the field. The directory has two parts. The first part consists of population educationprograms in 13 Asian countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Viet Nam) and the second part includes those in six Pacific countries (Micronesia, Fiji, Marshall Islands, Palau, Solomon Islands, and Tonga). Entries are classified alphabetically by country. Each project is described in terms of project title, duration, implementing unit, contact person and address, funding source, executing agency, objectives, scope, and major accomplishments. For purposes of the directory, the major achievements of each organization highlight 'hat has been achieved in the following areas: institutionalization; curriculum and materials development; orientation or training; Countries which have formally established population education sub-officesor branches at the state, region, province, or district levelare also included in this directory.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Leadership in the Constitution of the Marshall Islands
    TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS by C. J. LYNCH Working Papers Series Pacific Islands Studies Center for Asian and Pacific Studies in collaboration with the Social Science Research Institute University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii Joe Lynch is a consultant on legislation and constitutional drafting whose long experience in the Pacific encompasses island areas in Micronesia, Melanesia, and Polynesia. Robert C. Kiste, Director Pacific Islands Studies Program Center for Asian and Pacific Studies University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS (With Comparative Notes) C. J. Lynch 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface v Introductory 1 Part I. THE COUNCIL OF IROIJ l. The precursors 3 2. Functions of the Council 4 (a) General 4 (b) Relations with the Nitijela 6 ( c) The Council in action 9 3. Composition of the Council 10 4. Procedures of the Council 13 5. Miscellaneous matters 14 6. Comparisons 16 (a) Palau 16 (b) The Federated States of Micronesia 17 (c) Yap 18 (d) Vanuatu 21 (e) Western Samoa 22 (f) The Cook Islands 22 (g) Comment 24 Part II. THE TRADITIONAL RIGHTS COURT 7. The Traditional Rights Court and the judicial system 27 ADDENDUM: Two problems of interpretation 8. Comparisons and comment 34 Part III. CONCLUSION 9. General comments 35 10. Is a traditional input desirable? 37 APPENDIX 42 NOTES 43 iii PREFACE It hardly needs to be said that this paper is written by a lawyer and from a lawyer's point of view. This fact, however , necessarily means that it is selective, firstly in the aspects of its subject that are considered and secondly in the detail (especially on non-legal aspects) into which it goes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place of Alcohol in the Lives of People from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue
    The place of alcohol in the lives of people from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue, Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa living in New Zealand: an overview The place of alcohol in the lives of people from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue, Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa living in New Zealand: an overview A report prepared by Sector Analysis, Ministry of Health for the Alcohol Advisory Council of New Zealand ALAC Research Monograph Series: No 2 Wellington 1997 ISSN 1174-1856 ISBN 0-477-06317-9 Acknowledgments This particular chapter which is an overview of the reports from each of the six Pacific communities would not have been possible without all the field teams and participants who took part in the project. I would like to thank Ezra Jennings-Pedro, Terrisa Taupe, Tufaina Taupe Sofaia Kamakorewa, Maikali (Mike) Kilioni, Fane Malani, Tina McNicholas, Mere Samusamuvodre, Litimai Rasiga, Tevita Rasiga, Apisa Tuiqere, Ruve Tuivoavoa, Doreen Arapai, Dahlia Naepi, Slaven Naepi, Vili Nosa, Yvette Guttenbeil, Sione Liava’a, Wailangilala Tufui , Susana Tu’inukuafe, Anne Allan-Moetaua, Helen Kapi, Terongo Tekii, Tunumafono Ken Ah Kuoi, Tali Beaton, Myra McFarland, Carmel Peteru, Damas Potoi and their communities who supported them. Many people who have not been named offered comment and shared stories with us through informal discussion. Our families and friends were drawn in and though they did not formally participate they too gave their opinions and helped to shape the information gathered. Special thanks to all the participants and Jean Mitaera, Granby Siakimotu, Kili Jefferson, Dr Ian Prior, Henry Tuia, Lita Foliaki and Tupuola Malifa who reviewed the reports and asked pertinent questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Niue Treaty on Cooperation in Fisheries Surveillance and Law Enforcement in the South Pacific Region
    NIUE TREATY ON COOPERATION IN FISHERIES SURVEILLANCE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC REGION THE PARTIES TO THIS TREATY: GIVEN that in accordance with international law as expressed in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, coastal States have sovereign rights for the purposes of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the fisheries resources of their exclusive economic zones and fisheries zones; TAKING INTO ACCOUNT Article 73 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; NOTING that the Parties to the South Pacific Forum Fisheries Agency Convention, 1979 have agreed under Article 5 of that Convention that the Forum Fisheries Committee shall promote intra- regional coordination and cooperation in fisheries surveillance and law enforcement; CONSIDERING the vast areas of ocean covered by the exclusive economic zones and fisheries zones of coastal States in the South Pacific region and the vital economic significance of such zones to the economic development of South Pacific coastal States; WISHING THEREFORE to enhance their ability to enforce effectively their fisheries laws, and deter breaches of such laws; HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS In this Treaty: (a) 'fishing' means: (i) searching for, catching, taking or harvesting fish; (ii) attempting to search for, catch, take or harvest fish; (iii) engaging in any other activity which can reasonably be expected to result in the locating, catching, taking or harvesting of fish; (iv) placing, searching for or recovering fish aggregating devices or associated electronic equipment such as radio beacons; (v) any operations at sea directly in support of, or in preparation for any activity described in this paragraph; (vi) use of any craft, air or sea borne, for any activity described in this paragraph except for emergencies involving the health and safety of the crew or the safety of a vessel; (vii) the processing, carrying or transhipping of fish that have been taken.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Study (Focusing on Fiji, Tonga and Vanuatu
    1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Hazard exposure 1.1. Pacific island countries (PICs) are vulnerable to a broad range of natural disasters stemming from hydro-meteorological (such as cyclones, droughts, landslide and floods) and geo-physical hazards (volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and tsunamis). In any given year, it is likely that Fiji, Tonga and Vanuatu are either hit by, or recovering from, a major natural disaster. 1.2. The impact of natural disasters is estimated by the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative as equivalent to an annualized loss of 6.6% of GDP in Vanuatu, and 4.3% in Tonga. For Fiji, the average asset losses due to tropical cyclones and floods are estimated at more than 5%. 1.3. In 2014, Tropical Cyclone (TC) Ian caused damage equivalent to 11% to Tonga's GDP. It was followed in 2018 by damage close to 38% of GDP from TC Gita. In 2015, category five TC Pam displaced 25% of Vanuatu's population and provoked damage estimated at 64% of GDP. In Fiji, Tropical Cyclone Winston affected 62% of the population and wrought damage amounting to 31% of GDP, only some three and a half years after the passage of Tropical Cyclone Evan. 1.4. Vanuatu and Tonga rank number one and two in global indices of natural disaster risk. Seismic hazard is an ever-present danger for both, together with secondary risks arising from tsunamis and landslides. Some 240 earthquakes, ranging in magnitude between 3.3 and 7.1 on the Richter Scale, struck Vanuatu and its surrounding region in the first ten months of 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • ILO Brief Results of Fiji and Samoa RA for PIFS Final 22 July 2020
    u ILO Brief 1 Findings of the Rapid Assessment (RA) in Fiji and Samoa u Impact of COVID19 on employment and business in the pacific July 2020 Findings of the Rapid Assessment (RA) in Fiji and Samoa Introduction working-hour losses would be equivalent to 340 million full- time jobs in the last quarter. According to the latest ILO Monitor:COVID19 and the World of Work ( 5 th Edition) 1 released on 30 th June 2020, the number of The ILO has developed a global policy framework for tackling working hours lost across the world in the first half of 2020 the economic and social impact of the COVID-19 crisis and it is was significantly worse than previously estimated. The world based on the premise that the crisis has a human face and, as of work has been impacted severely mainly by prolongation such, it calls for a human-centered response. The framework and extension of containment measures. Compared to the first is based on four Pillars: and second quarter 2019, the following were the percentage of (1) Stimulating the economy and employment, working hours lost and its equivalence to full time jobs, for the (2) Supporting enterprises, jobs and incomes, first half of 2020: (3) Protecting workers in the workplace, (4) Relying on social dialogue for solutions. 2020 Lost working hrs Eq. full time jobs To determine the impact of COVID19 on employment and Q1 5.40% 155m business in the Pacific Island Countries, the ILO Pacific Office is working with its National Tripartite Constituents in the Q2 14% 400m member countries to undertake Rapid Assessments (RA).
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall Islands Nations Data 7.108028 °”N, 171.372771 °E Share of 2 Pacific Gdp 0.6% Source: United Nations Total Aid 2011-2016: Statistics
    POPULATION 53,066 SOURCE: UNITED NATIONS DESA / POPULATION DIVISION CURRENTGNI PER PRICESCAPITA - US $ 4,677.70 SOURCE: UNITED MARSHALL ISLANDS NATIONS DATA 7.108028 °”N, 171.372771 °E SHARE OF 2 PACIFIC GDP 0.6% SOURCE: UNITED NATIONS TOTAL AID 2011-2016: STATISTICS $466M $536M 484 33 GOVERNANCE spent committed projects 2 4.81 (PERCENTILE RANK 9 (0-100) - INDICATES RANK OF COUNTRY AMONG ALL COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD. The Lowy Institute Pacific Aid Map 0 CORRESPONDS TO LOWEST RANK AND 100 CORRESPONDS TO HIGHEST RANK.) is an analytical tool designed to SOURCE: WORLDWIDE GOVERNANCE INDICATORS *EXCEPT COOK ISLANDS AND enhance aid effectiveness in the NIUE: LOWY INSTITUTE ANALYSIS Pacific by improving coordination, alignment and accountability of ODA % OF GNI foreign aid through enhanced 11.99% transparency of aid flows. SOURCE: LOWY INSTITUTE The Pacific Aid Map team has *ALL DEMOGRAPHIC FIGURES 2016. collected data on close to 13,000 projects in 14 countries from 63 OTHERS - $13M donors from 2011 onwards. TOP DONORS ADB - $16M Visit the website on USA JAP TW* AUS pacificaidmap.lowyinstitute.org $314M $49M $45M $29M *TAIWAN IS INCLUDED IN THE PACIFIC AID MAP AS A SELF-GOVERNING TERRITORY CLAIMED BY CHINA. TOTAL AID SPENT / COMMITTED 2011-2016 COMMITTED SPENT KEY DATES 2011 US $75m on Compacts of Free Association, Multiple Grants and 2014 Marshall Islands declares a state of emergency after major flooding Agreements 2015 UAE $2.7m project: 600 KW Solar PV Power project 2013 Pacific island leaders sign “Majuro Declaration” to tackle climate change. 2016 Taiwan $4m Home Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy project TOP 10 AID PROJECTS SPENT (2011-2016) DONOR PROJECT TITLE AMOUNT IMPLMENTING PARTNER SECTOR LOCATION United States Compacts of Free Association, Sector Grants: $75,011,450.00 Government of Marshall Government & US Embassy, Program Support - Unspecified.
    [Show full text]
  • Atoll Research Bulletin No. 503 the Vascular Plants Of
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 503 THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF MAJURO ATOLL, REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS BY NANCY VANDER VELDE ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A. AUGUST 2003 Uliga Figure 1. Majuro Atoll THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF MAJURO ATOLL, REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS ABSTRACT Majuro Atoll has been a center of activity for the Marshall Islands since 1944 and is now the major population center and port of entry for the country. Previous to the accompanying study, no thorough documentation has been made of the vascular plants of Majuro Atoll. There were only reports that were either part of much larger discussions on the entire Micronesian region or the Marshall Islands as a whole, and were of a very limited scope. Previous reports by Fosberg, Sachet & Oliver (1979, 1982, 1987) presented only 115 vascular plants on Majuro Atoll. In this study, 563 vascular plants have been recorded on Majuro. INTRODUCTION The accompanying report presents a complete flora of Majuro Atoll, which has never been done before. It includes a listing of all species, notation as to origin (i.e. indigenous, aboriginal introduction, recent introduction), as well as the original range of each. The major synonyms are also listed. For almost all, English common names are presented. Marshallese names are given, where these were found, and spelled according to the current spelling system, aside from limitations in diacritic markings. A brief notation of location is given for many of the species. The entire list of 563 plants is provided to give the people a means of gaining a better understanding of the nature of the plants of Majuro Atoll.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Freely Associated States Include the Republic Low Coral Islands (Figure FAS-1)
    NOAA Coral Reef Ecosystem Research Plan PACIFIC FREELY Republic of the Marshall Islands ASSOCIATED STATES The Marshall Islands encompasses approximately 1,225 individual islands and islets, with 29 atolls and 5 solitary The Pacific Freely Associated States include the Republic low coral islands (Figure FAS-1). The Marshalls have a 2 of the Marshall Islands (the Marshalls), the Federated total dry land area of only about 181.3 km . However, States of Micronesia (FSM), and the Republic of Palau when the Exclusive Economic Zone (from the shoreline (Palau). These islands are all independent countries that to 200 miles offshore) is considered, the Republic covers 2 at one-time were governed by the U. S. as part of the Trust 1,942,000 km of ocean within the larger Micronesia 2 Territory of the Pacific Islands after World War II. Although region. There are 11,670 km of sea within the lagoons these countries are independent, they still maintain close of the atolls. Land makes up less than 0.01% of the ties with the U.S. and are eligible to receive funds from area of the Marshalls. Most of the country is the broad U.S. Federal agencies, including NOAA, DOI, EPA, and the open ocean with a seafloor depth that reaches 4.6 km. National Science Foundation. Scattered throughout the Marshalls are nearly 100 isolated submerged volcanic seamounts; those with flattened tops The coral reef resources of these islands remain are called guyots. The average elevation of the Marshalls mostly unmapped. is about 2 m above sea level. In extremely dry years, there may be no precipitation on some of the drier atolls.
    [Show full text]
  • 4348 Fiji Planning Map 1008
    177° 00’ 178° 00’ 178° 30’ 179° 00’ 179° 30’ 180° 00’ Cikobia 179° 00’ 178° 30’ Eastern Division Natovutovu 0 10 20 30 Km 16° 00’ Ahau Vetauua 16° 00’ Rotuma 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 km 16°00’ 12° 30’ 180°00’ Qele Levu Nambouono FIJI 0 25 50 75 100 mi 180°30’ 20 Km Tavewa Drua Drua 0 10 National capital 177°00’ Kia Vitina Nukubasaga Mali Wainingandru Towns and villages Sasa Coral reefs Nasea l Cobia e n Pacific Ocean n Airports and airfields Navidamu Labasa Nailou Rabi a ve y h 16° 30’ o a C Natua r B Yanuc Division boundaries d Yaqaga u a ld Nabiti ka o Macuata Ca ew Kioa g at g Provincial boundaries Votua N in Yakewa Kalou Naravuca Vunindongoloa Loa R p Naselesele Roads u o Nasau Wailevu Drekeniwai Laucala r Yasawairara Datum: WGS 84; Projection: Alber equal area G Bua Bua Savusavu Laucala Denimanu conic: standard meridan, 179°15’ east; standard a Teci Nakawakawa Wailagi Lala w Tamusua parallels, 16°45’ and 18°30’ south. a Yandua Nadivakarua s Ngathaavulu a Nacula Dama Data: VMap0 and Fiji Islands, FMS 16, Lands & Y Wainunu Vanua Levu Korovou CakaudroveTaveuni Survey Dept., Fiji 3rd Edition, 1998. Bay 17° 00’ Nabouwalu 17° 00’ Matayalevu Solevu Northern Division Navakawau Naitaba Ngunu Viwa Nanuku Passage Bligh Water Malima Nanuya Kese Lau Group Balavu Western Division V Nathamaki Kanacea Mualevu a Koro Yacata Wayalevu tu Vanua Balavu Cikobia-i-lau Waya Malake - Nasau N I- r O Tongan Passage Waya Lailai Vita Levu Rakiraki a Kade R Susui T Muna Vaileka C H Kuata Tavua h E Navadra a Makogai Vatu Vara R Sorokoba Ra n Lomaiviti Mago
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Between Papua New Guinea and Fiji, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Australia and New Zealand, Concerning the Status of Elements of the Defence F
    Agreement between Papua New Guinea and Fiji, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Australia and New Zealand, concerning the Status of Elements of the Defence F... Australian Treaty Series [Index] [Global Search] [Database Search] [Notes] [Noteup] [Help] Australian Treaty Series 1994 No 30 DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE CANBERRA Agreement between Papua New Guinea and Fiji, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Australia and New Zealand, concerning the Status of Elements of the Defence Forces of those Countries Deployed in the North Solomons Province of Papua New Guinea as part of the South Pacific Peacekeeping Force (Suva, 28 September 1994) Entry into force generally and for Australia: 7 October 1994 AUSTRALIAN TREATY SERIES 1994 No. 30 Australian Government Publishing Service Canberra (c) Commonwealth of Australia 1995 AGREEMENT BETWEEN PAPUA NEW GUINEA AND FIJI, TONGA, SOLOMON ISLANDS, VANUATU, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND, CONCERNING THE STATUS OF ELEMENTS OF THE DEFENCE FORCES OF THOSE COUNTRIES DEPLOYED IN THE NORTH SOLOMONS PROVINCE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA AS PART OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC PEACEKEEPING FORCE PAPUA NEW GUINEA, FIJI, TONGA, SOLOMON ISLANDS, VANUATU, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: RECOGNIZING the need for cooperation between countries in the South Pacific; NOTING that on 8 September 1994 Papua New Guinea entered into a Ceasefire Agreement with the Bougainville Revolutionary Army and the organisation known as the Bougainville Interim Government after five years of fighting in Bougainville, North Solomons Province of Papua New Guinea; NOTING FURTHER that the said Ceasefire Agreement provides for a Bougainville Peace Conference to take place at Arawa and for other activities in support of the ceasefire to occur in other agreed places in the said North Solomons Province; http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1994/30.html[04/09/2015 10:32:03] Agreement between Papua New Guinea and Fiji, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Australia and New Zealand, concerning the Status of Elements of the Defence F..
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Table 6-32 Regions and Countries/Economies in World Trade Data
    Appendix table 6-32 Regions and countries/economies in world trade data North America Europe Middle East Africa Asia Canada EU Israel All others (continued) All others (continued) Mexico Austria Saudi Arabia Mali Kazakhstan United States Belgium Turkey Mauritania Kyrgyzstan Central and South America Czech Republic United Arab Emirates Mauritius Laos Argentina Denmark All others Mayotte Maldives Brazil Denmark Bahrain Mozambique Mongolia Central America Faroe Islands Gaza Strip Niger Nepal Belize Finland Iran Nigeria North Korea Costa Rica France Iraq Reunion Pakistan El Salvador Germany Jordan Rwanda Papua New Guinea Guatemala Hungary Lebanon Saint Helena, Ascension, and Sri Lanka Honduras Ireland Kuwait Tristan da Cunha Tajikistan Nicaragua Italy Oman São Tomé and Príncipe Turkmenistan Panama Italy Qatar Senegal Uzbekistan Chile San Marino Syria Seychelles Australia/Oceania Colombia Vatican City Yemen Sierra Leone Australia Peru Netherlands Africa Somalia Australia Venezuela Poland Egypt Sudan Christmas Island All others Slovakia Kenya Swaziland Cocos (Keeling) Islands Anguilla Spain Morocco Tanzania Heard Island and McDonald Islands Antigua and Barbuda Sweden Southern Africa Togo Norfolk Island Aruba United Kingdom Botswana Uganda New Zealand Bahamas, The All others Lesotho Western Sahara Cook Islands Barbados Bulgaria Namibia Zambia New Zealand Bermuda Cyprus South Africa Zimbabwe Niue Bonaire Estonia Tunisia Asia Tokelau Bolivia Greece All others China Pacific Islands Cayman Islands Latvia Algeria China American Samoa Cuba Lithuania
    [Show full text]