DOCSLIB.ORG

Stanhope and Tyne Railway, Plot 1, Pattinson, Washington Tyne and Wear

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stanhope and Tyne Railway, Plot 1, Pattinson, Washington Tyne and Wear STANHOPE AND TYNE RAILWAY, PLOT 1, PATTINSON, WASHINGTON TYNE AND WEAR Archaeological Survey and Evaluation Oxford Archaeology North July 2005 John Samuels Archaeological Consultants Issue No: 2005-6/378 OA North Job No: L9520 NGR: NZ 32450 56500 Document Title: STANHOPE AND TYNE RAILWAY, PLOT 1, PATTINSON, WASHINGTON, TYNE AND WEAR Document Type: Archaeological Survey and Evaluation Client Name: John Samuels Archaeological Consultants Issue Number: 2005-6/378 OA North Job Number: L9520 Site Code: PW05 National Grid Reference: NZ 32450 56500 Prepared by: Kathryn Blythe Jo Dawson Position: Project Supervisor Project Supervisor Date: July 2005 July 2005 Checked by: Jamie Quartermaine Signed……………………. Position: Project Manager Date: July 2005 Approved by: Alan Lupton Signed……………………. Position: Operations Manager Date: July 2005 Oxford Archaeology North © Oxford Archaeological Unit Ltd (2005) Storey Institute Janus House Meeting House Lane Osney Mead Lancaster Oxford LA1 1TF OX2 0EA t: (0044) 01524 848666 t: (0044) 01865 263800 f: (0044) 01524 848606 f: (0044) 01865 793496 w: www.oxfordarch.co.uk e: [email protected] Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited is a Registered Charity No: 285627 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Oxford Archaeology being obtained. Oxford Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person/party using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Oxford Archaeology for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Oxford Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person/party by whom it was commissioned. Stanhope and Tyne Railway, Plot 1, Pattinson, Washington, Tyne and Wear: Archaeological Survey and Evaluation 1 CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 3 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Circumstances of Project.............................................................................................. 4 2METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Project Brief ................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Rapid Desk-Based Assessment.................................................................................... 5 2.3 Topographic Survey..................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Evaluation .................................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Archive......................................................................................................................... 6 3. BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Location, Topography and Geology ............................................................................ 7 3.2 History of the Stanhope and Tyne Railway and its Successors along the Same Track7 3.3 Map Regression Analysis........................................................................................... 10 4. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY..................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 13 4.2 Description and Condition ......................................................................................... 13 5. EVALUATION...................................................................................................................... 14 5.1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 14 5.2 Results........................................................................................................................ 14 6. DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................ 17 6.1 Discussion .................................................................................................................. 17 7. IMPACT .............................................................................................................................. 19 7.1 Impact......................................................................................................................... 19 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................. 20 8.1 Cartographic and Primary Sources............................................................................. 20 8.2 Secondary Sources ..................................................................................................... 21 APPENDIX 1: PROJECT BRIEF ............................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 2: CONTEXT LIST................................................................................................. 29 ILLUSTRATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 31 Figures.................................................................................................................................... 31 Plates .................................................................................................................................... 31 For the use of John Samuels Archaeological Consultants © OA North: July 2005 Stanhope and Tyne Railway, Plot 1, Pattinson, Washington, Tyne and Wear: Archaeological Survey and Evaluation 2 SUMMARY John Samuels Archaeological Consultants, acting on behalf of McLagan Investments Ltd, appointed Oxford Archaeology (North) to undertake archaeological works at Plot 1, Pattinson, North Walton Road, to the east of Washington, Tyne and Wear, immediately south of the A1231 to Sunderland (NGR NZ 32450 56500) (Fig 1). The development area includes a 100m stretch of the former Stanhope and Tyne Railway embankment. Following on from the cutting of a section through the embankment, to enable the construction of a haul road, a programme of work was requested by Tyne and Wear Archaeological Services to assess the survival of the embankment and trackbed within the development area. Following receipt of a brief from Tyne and Wear Archaeological Service, the programme of work was undertaken in April 2005.. The required archaeological works entailed the implementation of a rapid desk-based assessment, a topographic survey of the embankment and an evaluation of the extant earthwork. During the rapid desk-based assessment, an historical background for the railway was researched using the Historic Environment Record for Tyne and Wear, the County Record Office in Durham, and the Sunderland Local Studies Centre. A map regression analysis was undertaken to trace the development of the site over time. This research indicated that the Stanhope and Tyne Railway opened in 1834, and underwent considerable fluctuations of fortune and numerous changes of name and ownership before finally closing in 1981. A topographic survey of the site was undertaken to assess the survival of the embankment on the site; this produced a hachure and contour plan and a series of profiles across the extant embankment. The evaluation entailed the excavation of shallow trenches across the top of the embankment to establish the survival of the former trackbed, and also the cleaning and recording of the section exposed for the construction of the haul road. The preservation of the embankment was variable across the development area, but was best where the feature had been bisected by the haul road, and was here clearly visible in section. The cleaning and recording of this section allowed two phases of use to be identified, comprising the cuts for the trackbed and an associated ditch for the first phase of use of the embankment, and the modification of the embankment with an associated ditch for its second phase of use. The evaluation of the site confirmed the results of the topographic survey in that the embankment was heavily truncated; in addition, it ascertained that no physical remains of the trackbed survived. The survey and evaluation has recorded the embankment as it survives in this area, while the desk-based assessment has placed the feature within a detailed historical framework. An agreement was reached between JSAC and the curatorial archaeologist, following completion of fieldwork, that no further work was archaeological required on the site. This document outlines the results of the field and desk-based work undertaken by OA North. For the use of John Samuels Archaeological Consultants © OA North:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Who Runs the North East … Now?
    WHO RUNS THE NORTH EAST … NOW? A Review and Assessment of Governance in North East England Fred Robinson Keith Shaw Jill Dutton Paul Grainger Bill Hopwood Sarah Williams June 2000 Who Runs the North East … Now? This report is published by the Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Durham. Further copies are available from: Dr Fred Robinson, Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3JT (tel: 0191 374 2308, fax: 0191 374 4743; e-mail: [email protected]) Price: £25 for statutory organisations, £10 for voluntary sector organisations and individuals. Copyright is held collectively by the authors. Quotation of the material is welcomed and further analysis is encouraged, provided that the source is acknowledged. First published: June 2000 ISBN: 0 903593 16 5 iii Who Runs the North East … Now? CONTENTS Foreword i Preface ii The Authors iv Summary v 1 Introduction 1 2 Patterns and Processes of Governance 4 3 Parliament and Government 9 4 The European Union 25 5 Local Government 33 6 Regional Governance 51 7 The National Health Service 64 8 Education 92 9 Police Authorities 107 10 Regeneration Partnerships 113 11 Training and Enterprise Councils 123 12 Housing Associations 134 13 Arts and Culture 148 14 Conclusions 156 iii Who Runs the North East … Now? FOREWORD Other developments also suggest themselves. At their meeting in November 1998, the The present work is admirably informative and trustees of the Millfield House Foundation lucid, but the authors have reined in the were glad to receive an application from Fred temptation to explore the implications of what Robinson for an investigation into the they have found.
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland and Durham Family History Society Unwanted
    Northumberland and Durham Family History Society baptism birth marriage No Gsurname Gforename Bsurname Bforename dayMonth year place death No Bsurname Bforename Gsurname Gforename dayMonth year place all No surname forename dayMonth year place Marriage 933ABBOT Mary ROBINSON James 18Oct1851 Windermere Westmorland Marriage 588ABBOT William HADAWAY Ann 25 Jul1869 Tynemouth Marriage 935ABBOTT Edwin NESS Sarah Jane 20 Jul1882 Wallsend Parrish Church Northumbrland Marriage1561ABBS Maria FORDER James 21May1861 Brooke, Norfolk Marriage 1442 ABELL Thirza GUTTERIDGE Amos 3 Aug 1874 Eston Yorks Death 229 ADAM Ellen 9 Feb 1967 Newcastle upon Tyne Death 406 ADAMS Matilda 11 Oct 1931 Lanchester Co Durham Marriage 2326ADAMS Sarah Elizabeth SOMERSET Ernest Edward 26 Dec 1901 Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne Marriage1768ADAMS Thomas BORTON Mary 16Oct1849 Coughton Northampton Death 1556 ADAMS Thomas 15 Jan 1908 Brackley, Norhants,Oxford Bucks Birth 3605 ADAMS Sarah Elizabeth 18 May 1876 Stockton Co Durham Marriage 568 ADAMSON Annabell HADAWAY Thomas William 30 Sep 1885 Tynemouth Death 1999 ADAMSON Bryan 13 Aug 1972 Newcastle upon Tyne Birth 835 ADAMSON Constance 18 Oct 1850 Tynemouth Birth 3289ADAMSON Emma Jane 19Jun 1867Hamsterley Co Durham Marriage 556 ADAMSON James Frederick TATE Annabell 6 Oct 1861 Tynemouth Marriage1292ADAMSON Jane HARTBURN John 2Sep1839 Stockton & Sedgefield Co Durham Birth 3654 ADAMSON Julie Kristina 16 Dec 1971 Tynemouth, Northumberland Marriage 2357ADAMSON June PORTER William Sidney 1May 1980 North Tyneside East Death 747 ADAMSON
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 3 March.Pmd
    Issue No 3 Volume 9 Lanchester, March 2008 For contact information, see page 2 CLIFF HUDSPITH CRIME IN RETIRES VILLAGE Cliff Hudspith, Village LEAD TWO Handyman, or to give him his correct title, THIEVES YOUTHS Maintenance Operative, On 5th March, 3 people ARRESTED retires at the end of March. from Lanchester were Cliff has spent 11 happy arrested in connection It was previously reported years with the Parish with the thefts of lead from that two men were Council. Prior to this, he premises in the village. assaulted on Front Street spent 34 years in the The three people aged 20, on Lanchester 16th June Prison Service, joining at 16 and 14 are all from 2007. This was not Durham, transferring to Lanchester. They have reported to the Police but Usk for two years, been interviewed and captured on the CCTV followed by Medomsley bailed for identification and passed to the Police. for 13 years. He then procedures. No lead has PC Hutchison managed to travelled the country in a been recovered from the trace the two victims and recruitment role, finally individuals who cannot persuaded them to returning to Durham, first be named at this time. I provide statements. PC as a Training Manager, would ask that people Hutchison was then able then Security Manager. remain vigilant at all times to arrest two youths in Cliff intends to spend his as the most recent connection with the second retirement on DIY attempted theft of lead attack. One of the two in his home, and being was at a garage in Foxhills youths was later charged even more involved with Crescent last week.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Political Oratory and Itinerant Lecturing in Yorkshire and the North East in the Age of Chartism, 1837-60 Janette Lisa M
    Popular political oratory and itinerant lecturing in Yorkshire and the North East in the age of Chartism, 1837-60 Janette Lisa Martin This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of York Department of History January 2010 ABSTRACT Itinerant lecturers declaiming upon free trade, Chartism, temperance, or anti- slavery could be heard in market places and halls across the country during the years 1837- 60. The power of the spoken word was such that all major pressure groups employed lecturers and sent them on extensive tours. Print historians tend to overplay the importance of newspapers and tracts in disseminating political ideas and forming public opinion. This thesis demonstrates the importance of older, traditional forms of communication. Inert printed pages were no match for charismatic oratory. Combining personal magnetism, drama and immediacy, the itinerant lecturer was the most effective medium through which to reach those with limited access to books, newspapers or national political culture. Orators crucially united their dispersed audiences in national struggles for reform, fomenting discussion and coalescing political opinion, while railways, the telegraph and expanding press reportage allowed speakers and their arguments to circulate rapidly. Understanding of political oratory and public meetings has been skewed by over- emphasis upon the hustings and high-profile politicians. This has generated two misconceptions: that political meetings were generally rowdy and that a golden age of political oratory was secured only through Gladstone’s legendary stumping tours. However, this thesis argues that, far from being disorderly, public meetings were carefully regulated and controlled offering disenfranchised males a genuine democratic space for political discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Westlaw Wood
    Westlaw Wood Westlaw Wood Management Plan 2019-2024 Westlaw Wood MANAGEMENT PLAN - CONTENTS PAGE ITEM Page No. Introduction Plan review and updating Woodland Management Approach Summary 1.0 Site details 2.0 Site description 2.1 Summary Description 2.2 Extended Description 3.0 Public access information 3.1 Getting there 3.2 Access / Walks 4.0 Long term policy 5.0 Key Features 5.1 Informal Public Access 5.2 Ancient Semi Natural Woodland 5.3 Watercourses 6.0 Work Programme Appendix 1: Compartment descriptions Glossary MAPS Access Conservation Features Management 2 Westlaw Wood THE WOODLAND TRUST INTRODUCTION PLAN REVIEW AND UPDATING The Trust¶s corporate aims and management The information presented in this Management approach guide the management of all the plan is held in a database which is continuously Trust¶s properties, and are described on Page 4. being amended and updated on our website. These determine basic management policies Consequently this printed version may quickly and methods, which apply to all sites unless become out of date, particularly in relation to the specifically stated otherwise. Such policies planned work programme and on-going include free public access; keeping local people monitoring observations. informed of major proposed work; the retention Please either consult The Woodland Trust of old trees and dead wood; and a desire for website www.woodlandtrust.org.uk or contact the management to be as unobtrusive as possible. Woodland Trust The Trust also has available Policy Statements ([email protected]) to confirm covering a variety of woodland management details of the current management programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Breastfeeding Health Equity Audit County Durham 2016
    Breastfeeding Health Equity Audit County Durham 2016 Michelle Baldwin Katie Dunstan-Smith Michael Fleming July 2016 Public health intelligence to inform commissioning… Title Breastfeeding Health Equity Audit 2016 Author Michelle Baldwin (Public Health Portfolio Lead) Michael Fleming (Public Health Epidemiologist) Katie Dunstan-Smith (Public Health Intelligence Specialist) Date July 2016 Purpose To systematically identify and measure inequality in breastfeeding by assessing the distribution of breastfeeding relative to deprivation with County Durham. To make recommendations based on the findings to ensure that action is agreed and incorporated into systems with planning, policy and practice in order to improve breastfeeding uptake and maintenance. Contact details [email protected] 2 Contents Page Key findings 4 Breastfeeding infographic 5 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Breastfeeding: why is it important? 6 1.2 National and Local Policy 7 1.3 What are health inequalities? 8 1.4 What is Health Equity Audit? 8 1.5 Measuring breastfeeding: glossary and definitions 9 1.6 Data quality, availability and limitations 10 2. Profiling County Durham 12 2.1 County Durham population and deprivation profile 13 2.2 Birth profile 15 2.3 National and local trends 17 2.4 Benchmarking 19 2.5 Analysis by age and ethnicity 21 3. Within County Durham 23 3.1 Within County Durham – locality analysis 23 3.2 Within County Durham – small area (MSOA) variation 24 3.3 Measuring the inequality gap within County Durham 28 4. Recommendations 33 3 Key Findings 1. By comparing County Durham to others… Breastfeeding rates for initiation and 6 to 8 week prevalence in County Durham are consistently and significantly lower than England.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 N O R T H U M B E R L a N D a N D F a M I L Y
    T H E J O U R N A L O F T H E N O R T H U M B E R L A N D A N D D U R H A M F A M I L Y H I S T O R Y S O C I E T Y Vol 5 No 1 October 1979 CONTENTS EDITORIAL 2 KNOW YOUR PARISH - I . MEDOMSLEY, COUNTY DURHAM Dr D .W . Burdon 2 THE JUNE MEETING - QUIZ AND SOCIAL EVENING 3 THE "RUNAWAY REGISTERS" AT HADDINGTON 5 SO YOU THINK YOU HAVE TROUBLES G .T . Millican 8 MEMBERS AND THEIR INTERESTS 9 SECOND TIME AROUND 11 CHANGES OF ADDRESS 12 CALLING ARIZONA 12 HELP WANTED 12 QUIZ ANSWERS 13 LETTER TO THE EDITOR 14 A STRAY MARRIAGE 14 FUTURE PROGRAMME 14 INDEX TO VOLUME FOUR 15 GENEALOGICAL NAME INDEX 15 PLACE INDEX 22 ARTICLES AND FEATURES 28 THE WITCH OF WASHINGTON K .D .D . Henderson 30 " STRAY 30 All items in this Journal are the copyright of the Northumberland and Durham Family History Society or its contributors . Correspondence connected with the Journal should be addressed to the Editor, Mr G . Nicholson, 57 Manor Park, Concord, Washington, Tyne & Wear, NE37 2BU . All other correspondence should be addressed to the Secretary, Mr J .A . Readdie, 38 Archery Rise, Neville's Cross, Durham, DH1 4LA. PLEASE always include stamps for return postage when writing (two International Reply Coupons from overseas members) and quote your membership number . Books from the Society's Library may be borrowed from, and should be returned to, the Librarian, Dr M .E .
    [Show full text]
  • North East Region
    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the North East region June 2021 Contents Summary 2 Who we are and what we do 2 The 2023 Review 2 Initial proposals 2 What is changing in the North East region? 2 How to have your say 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 4 2 Background to the 2023 Review 5 The rules in the legislation 6 Timetable for our review 7 Stage one – development of initial proposals 7 Stage two – consultation on initial proposals 8 Stage three – consultation on representations received 8 Stage four – development and publication of revised proposals 9 Stage five – development and publication of the final report and recommendations 9 3 Initial proposals for the North East region 10 Initial proposals for the Newcastle upon Tyne, North Tyneside and Northumberland sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the County Durham, South Tyneside and Sunderland sub-region 13 Initial proposals for the Gateshead sub-region 15 Initial proposals for the Tees Valley sub-region 16 4 How to have your say 18 How can you give us your views? 19 What do we want views on? 20 Appendix: Initial proposals for constituencies, including wards and electorates 21 Glossary 32 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the North East region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do The Boundary Commission for England (BCE) is an independent and impartial non-departmental public body, which is responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The 2023 Review We have the task of periodically reviewing the boundaries of all the Parliamentary constituencies in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Youth Support
    Cabinet 13 January 2016 Review of Youth Support Report of Corporate Management Team Rachael Shimmin, Corporate Director Children & Adults Services Councillor Ossie Johnson, Cabinet Portfolio Holder for Children and Young People Services Purpose of the Report 1. This report will set out the outcomes of a review of the current youth service delivery model and describe a Strategy for Youth Support. 2. The review and the Strategy have informed a new delivery model for a Targeted Youth Support Service which aims to deliver improved outcomes for young people aged 13 – 19 years in County Durham. 3. Based on the review and the resulting strategy, the report seeks permission to consult on the following:- Proposal 1: A Strategy for Youth Support in County Durham Proposal 2: Deploy Council resources according to need to deliver a Targeted Youth Support Service Proposal 3: Ceasing the existing youth work support grant and the allocation of funding to each Area Action Partnership (AAP) to address local priorities linked to youth services. Finance 4. The Council’s current MTFP requires efficiency savings of approximately £225m from 2011/12 until 2017/18. The Council anticipates that further savings of £103m will be required by April 2019. Savings targets for Children and Adults Services (CAS) are currently £16.9m for 2016/17 and £25.2m for 2017/18, with further budget reductions expected for the service in 2018/19. 5. Historically the youth support service (and its budget) was a distinct service however, since the introduction of the One Point Service in 2011, the provision of support for young people has formed an integral part of the broader early help offer delivered in and through the One Point Service.
    [Show full text]
  • City Regions and Rural Areas in the North East of England Full Report
    City Regions and Rural Areas in the North East of England Full Report Jane Midgley Neil Ward Jane Atterton Centre for Rural Economy Research Report May 2005 CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction: The Context for the Study 14 Cities, City Regions and the Northern Way 14 Rural-Urban Interdependencies 16 The North East and its City Regions 17 2. City Regions and Rural Areas: The Evidence Base 24 2.1 People and Jobs 24 2.2 Commuting Patterns 41 2.3 Leisure and Retailing 61 2.4 Tourism 66 3. Evaluation & Analysis 80 4. Conclusions & Recommendations 83 Bibliography 87 Appendices Appendix I Area Definitions for ‘People and Jobs’ Analysis Appendix II Area Definitions for the Commuting Analysis Appendix III The Northern Way and the Rural North: The Next Steps 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction: The Context for the Study • This study has been commissioned by One North East, the Regional Development Agency (RDA) for the North East of England. It examines the relationship between city regions and rural areas. In particular, the study examines the links between two city regions in the North East region (Tyne & Wear and Tees Valley) and the rural areas within and surrounding them. It identifies the types of linkages and available data sources to quantify the scale of flows. It comments on the current economic significance of such linkages and suggests ways in which their beneficial effects might be enhanced. • There has been growing interest in the concept of city regions amongst UK urban and regional development specialists in recent years. Academic researchers have long been interested in developing functionally-based definitions of different geographical areas, such as ‘functional urban regions’, ‘daily urban systems’ and ‘local labour market areas’.
    [Show full text]
  • Shotley Bridge Village Trust
    Conservation Area Appraisal Design & Historic Environment Durham County Council County Hall Durham Shotley Bridge County Durham DH1 5UL December 2009 Tel: 0191 383 4196 Fax: 0191 383 4096 Contents Consultation 3 Shotley Bridge Conservation Area Boundary Map 4 Introduction 5 Planning Policy Framework 6 Summary of Special Interest 7 Boundary Changes 8 History and Development 10 Architectural Interest 14 Historic Building Materials 15 Setting and Views 17 Character Areas Map 19 Character Areas 20 Character Area 1: Shotley Grove 20 Character Area 2: The Village Core 21 Character Area 3: New Development 23 Character Area 4: Snow’s Green Hamlet 25 Character Area 5: Victorian Villas 26 Character Area 6: Shotley Park and The Spa Grounds 28 Character Area 7: Agricultural West Bank of the River 29 Character Area 8: Wooded Shotley Hall Estate 30 Character Area 9: Cutler’s Hall Road (proposed 32 extension) Character Area 10: Turn of the 19th / 20th Century 32 Terraced Developments Issues and Potential for Improvement 34 Management Proposals 40 References and Contacts 42 Appendix 1: Schedule of Listed Buildings 44 Appendix 2: Schedule of Unlisted Buildings of Local 48 Interest Appendix 3: Tree Preservation Orders 61 Appendix 4: Article 4(2) Direction 61 Maps Character Analysis Map Activity Map Designated 1975 Boundary amended 1981 Boundary amended 1994 Northumberland area added 2002 Appraisal 2009 Boundary amended 2009 1 2 Consultation A successful conservation area relies on • Comments sheets were sent out to the support of the community. It is give people the opportunity to express important that the local authority and the their opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • Annfield Plain DRAFT May 2013
    Heritage, Landscape and Design Annfield Plain DRAFT May 2013 Conservation Area Appraisal 2 Annfield Plain Consultation The successful management of a conservation area relies on the support of the local community and it is important that the local authority and the community work together to preserve and enhance the special character of Annfield Plain. Please send any comments to Heritage, Landscape and Design Team Durham County Council County Hall Durham DH1 5UQ Telephone 03000 267146 Email [email protected] Closing date for comments: 12th July 2013 3 Conservation Area Appraisal CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL Annfield Plain May 2013 Subject Page Summary of Special Interest.....................................................................6 Conser Public Consultation ..................................................................................6 Planning Legislation.................................................................................7 vation Conservation Area Character Appraisals...................................................8 Area Historical Summary................................................................................ 10 Form and Layout.................................................................................... 11 Bounda Architectural Character........................................................................... 12 ry Building Materials .................................................................................. 16 Boundaries and Means of Enclosure......................................................
    [Show full text]