DOCSLIB.ORG

State Route 116 Corridor Review.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State Route 116 Corridor Review.Indd STATE ROUTE 116 CORRIDOR REVIEW -ROANOKE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF ROANOKE- Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Organization July 2008 Acknowledgements ROANOKE VALLEY AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) POLICY BOARD David Trinkle, Chair Billy Martin, Sr. Richard Flora, Vice Chair Joe McNamara Doug Adams Alvin Nash Richard Caywood J. Lee E. Osborne Tony Cho Melinda Payne Tammy Davis Jackie Shuck Darrell Feasel Ron Smith Carolyn Fidler Dave Wheeler William E. Holdren, Jr. PROJECT TEAM Matthew Rehnborg Jake Gilmer This report was prepared by the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Planning Or- ganization (RVAMPO) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the Virginia Depart- ment of Transportation (VDOT). The contents of this report refl ect the views of the staff of the Roanoke Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO staff is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The con- tents do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial views or policies of the FHWA, VDOT, or RVARC. This report does not constitute a standard, specifi cation, or regulation. FHWA or VDOT acceptance of this report as evidence of fulfi llment of the objectives of this planning study does not constitute endorsement/approval of the need for any recommended improvements nor does it constitute approval of their location and design or a commitment to fund any such improvements. Additional project level environmental impact assessments and/or studies of alternatives may be nec- essary. 2 •STATE ROUTE 116 CORRIDOR REVIEW• JULY 2008 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: TRAFFIC INFORMATION....................................................................3 Overview.....................................................................................................................4 Vehicle Type and Traffi c Information...................................................................8 Accidents...................................................................................................................10 Bridge Conditions....................................................................................................11 CHAPTER 2: LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT.....................................................13 Residential Development.......................................................................................14 Commercial Development....................................................................................15 Industrial Development........................................................................................15 Institutional Properties...........................................................................................15 Future Land Use.....................................................................................................16 CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING........................................................19 Non-motorized Facilities........................................................................................20 Historic Resources...................................................................................................21 Endangered Species................................................................................................22 Water Resources......................................................................................................22 Wetlands...................................................................................................................24 TABLES Table 1- Road Characteristics..................................................................................5 Table 2- Current Traffi c Volumes...........................................................................8 Table 3- Projected Traffi c Volumes........................................................................9 Table 4- Accident Data..........................................................................................10 Table 5- Bridge Conditions....................................................................................11 MAPS Map 1- Traffi c Information....................................................................................12 Map 2- Current Zoning...........................................................................................17 Map 3- Environmental Screening: City of Roanoke..........................................25 Map 4- Environmental Screening: Roanoke County.........................................26 4 •STATE ROUTE 116 CORRIDOR REVIEW• JULY 2008 TRAFFIC INFORMATION 1 STATE ROUTE 116 IS AN IMPORTANT LINK between the Roanoke Valley and Smith Mountain Lake in Franklin County. Many residents of Roanoke make frequent trips to Smith Mountain Lake for recreati on or to second homes, while full-ti me residents in Franklin County use Rt. 116 to travel to Roanoke for employment or shopping. The full extent of Rt. 116 extends from Rt. 122 in Burnt Chimney, Franklin County to Rt. 101 in the City of Roanoke. The purpose of the Route 116 Corridor Review is to provide data and informati on for Roanoke County, the City of Roanoke, and the Virginia Department of Transportati on (VDOT) to use in their planning process. It examines the porti on of Rt. 116 from the Franklin County line to Jeff er- son Street in the City of Roanoke. The informati on collected will be use- ful in developing the Roanoke County and City of Roanoke Comprehensive Plans, as well as ‘Purpose and Need” statements for projects along the corridor. Environmental screening data contained in the Review will also help identi fy issues early in the planning process that may need to be addressed under provisions of the Nati onal Envi- ronmental Policy Act (NEPA). Overview State Route 116 is a two lane highway that runs in a southwest-northeast heading from State Route 122 in Franklin County to State Route 101 in Roanoke City. This corridor study will focus on the section of the road between Franklin County and Jef- ferson Street in Roanoke City. Route 116 is known by several names in this section. When it fi rst enters Roanoke County it is known as Jae Valley Road. Its name changes to Mt. Pleasant Boulevard in the community of Mount Pleasant. After its intersection with Route 658 in Roanoke City, its name changes to Riverland Road SE. Riverland Road SE continues until it reaches Piedmont Street SE. Route 116 briefl y uses Piedmont Street SE until it reaches Walnut Avenue SE. It then turns west onto Wal- nut Avenue SE and remains there until it reaches Jefferson Street. This section provides brief a summary of the physical characteristics of the road in the studied corridor. This information is also available in Table 1. FRANKLIN COUNTY LINE TO BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY State Route 116 enters Roanoke County from Franklin County through a pass in the Blue Ridge Mountains known as Windy Gap (Elevation 1257 ft.). The road’s elevation decreases 330 feet in the fi rst 0.7 miles of the corridor as it descends into the Back Creek basin. This portion of the road contains steep grades and several tight turns. After it passes over Back Creek, the road straightens and assumes a more level course for the next 1.41 miles until it reaches the Blue Ridge Parkway overpass. Route 116 is given a functional classi- fi cation of “major collector road” from the Federal Highway Administration in this section. The U.S. Census classifi ed this area as “rural.” The speed limit is 55 mph. The road has an average lane width of 10 feet and, as noted earlier, has several tight turns as it descends the Blue Ridge Mountains. The road has earth shoulders that are 1 foot wide between the Franklin County Line and One of several sharp turns on Rt. 116 as it descends the Blue Ridge Mountains Back Creek and 2 feet wide between 6 •STATE ROUTE 116 CORRIDOR REVIEW• JULY 2008 Back Creek and the Blue Ridge Parkway. There is one bridge in this section of the road (Virginia Structure 1087) that is used to cross over Back Creek. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY TO RIVERLAND ROAD SE After State Route 116 passes under the Blue Ridge Parkway, it enters into a census- designated “Urbanized (3C)” area. From this point until the end of the studied cor- ridor, its Federal Functional Classifi cation is “Urban Minor Arterial.” Route 116 passes through the most densely populated areas of the Mt. Pleasant community in this section and serves as the primary transportation artery for that community. The speed limit decreases to 45 mph in this section. The road has an average lane width of 12 feet and 4 foot wide earth shoulders between the Blue Ridge Parkway and the Roanoke City boundary, which is 1.17 miles away. After the road enters the City of Roanoke, the average lane width decreases to 10 feet and shoulders are eliminated entirely. MOUNT PLEASANT ROAD SE TO 9TH STREET SE This section begins at the intersection of State Route 116 and State Route 658. At that point, Route 116’s name changes from Mt. Pleasant Blvd. SE to Riverland Rd. SE. Additionally, the average lane width increases to 12 feet. The road continues to have no shoulders. Between the beginning of this section and the Riverland Rd. SE/Bennington St. SE intersection, which is only 0.16 miles away, the speed limit is 30 mph. After it passes that intersection, the speed limit increases to 35 mph. Between Bennington St. SE and 9th St. SE there are two traffi c signals. The fi rst is located at the intersection of Riverland Rd. SE and Garden City Blvd. SE. The second is at the Riverland Rd. SE/ 9th St. SE intersection.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geology and Mineral Deposits of the James River-Roanoke River Manganese District Virginia
    Geology and Mineral Deposits of the James River-Roanoke River Manganese District Virginia GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1008 Geology and Mineral ·Deposits oftheJatnes River-Roanoke River Manganese District Virginia By GILBERT H. ESPENSHADE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1008 A description of the geology anq mineral deposits, particularly manganese, of the James River-Roanoke River district UNITED STAT.ES GOVERNMENT, PRINTING. OFFICE• WASHINGTON : 1954 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS· Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction______________________________________________________ 4 Location, accessibility, and culture_______________________________ 4 Topography, climate, and vegetation _______________ .,.. _______ ---___ 6 Field work and acknowledgments________________________________ 6 Previouswork_________________________________________________ 8 GeneralgeologY--------------------------------------------------- 9 Principal features ____________________________ -- __________ ---___ 9 Metamorphic rocks____________________________________________ 11 Generalstatement_________________________________________ 11 Lynchburg gneiss and associated igneous rocks________________ 12 Evington groUP------------------------------------------- 14 Candler formation_____________________________________ 14 Archer Creek formation________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic TMDL Development for the Roanoke River, Virginia
    Benthic TMDL Development for the Roanoke River, Virginia Submitted to Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Prepared by 2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 March 2006 Benthic TMDL Development for Roanoke River Executive Summary Introduction As required by Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act and current EPA regulations, states are required to develop Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for waterbodies that exceed water quality standards. The Roanoke River was included on Virginia’s 1996 Section 303(d) TMDL Priority List and Report (DEQ, 1996) because of violations of the General Standard (benthic impairment). The headwaters of the Roanoke River originate in southwest Virginia. The Roanoke River flows through southcentral Virginia before crossing the North Carolina state line and discharging into the Albemarle Sound in North Carolina. Impairment Listing The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) uses biological monitoring of benthic macroinvertebrates as one method to assess support of the aquatic life use for a waterbody. Bioassessments of the benthic macroinvertebrate community of the Roanoke River were performed by DEQ using modified Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (EPA, 1999). Results of bioassessments indicated a moderately impaired benthic community at three monitoring stations on the river (4AROA202.20, 4AROA206.03, and 4AROA206.95). Therefore, since the river only partially supports the designated aquatic life use, the General Standard is being violated. As a result, the Roanoke River was included on the Section 303(d) list. Although biological assessments indicated the creek is impaired, additional analyses described in this report were required to identify the causal pollutant (stressor) and sources within the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Ridge Park Way DIRECTORY TRAVEL PLANNER
    65 TH Edition Blue Ridge Park way www.blueridgeparkway.org DIRECTORY TRAVEL PLANNER Includes THE PARKWAY MILEPOST Biltmore Asheville, NC Exit at Milepost 388.8 Grandfather Mountain Linville, NC Exit at Milepost 305.1 Roanoke Star and Overlook Roanoke, VA Exit at Milepost 120 Official Publication of the Blue Ridge Parkway Association The 65th Edition OFFICIAL PUBLICATION BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY ASSOCIATION, INC. P. O. BOX 2136, ASHEVILLE, NC 28802 (828) 670-1924 www.blueridgeparkway.org • [email protected] COPYRIGHT 2014 NO Portion OF THIS GUIDE OR ITS MAPS may BE REPRINTED WITHOUT PERMISSION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. Some Parkway photographs by William A. Bake, Mike Booher, Vicki Dameron and Jeff Greenberg © Blue Ridge Parkway Association Layout/Design: Imagewerks Productions: Arden, NC This free Directory & Travel PROMOTING Planner is published by the 500+ member Blue Ridge TOURISM FOR Parkway Association to help Chimney Rock at you more fully enjoy your Chimney Rock State Park Parkway area vacation. MORE THAN Members representing attractions, outdoor recre- ation, accommodations, res- Follow us for more Blue Ridge Parkway 60 YEARS taurants, shops, and a variety of other services essential to information and resources: the traveler are included in this publication. When you visit their place of business, please let them know www.blueridgeparkway.org you found them in the Blue Ridge Parkway Directory & Travel Planner. This will help us ensure the availability of another Directory & Travel Planner for your next visit
    [Show full text]
  • County of Roanoke Finance Department Purchasing Division
    COUNTY OF ROANOKE FINANCE DEPARTMENT PURCHASING DIVISION Kate Hoyt Buyer P.O. Box 29800 5204 Bernard Drive SW, Suite 300F Roanoke, VA 24018 Phone: (540) 283-8149 [email protected] November 9, 2018 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS #2019-058 Food, Beverage, Programming, RV Camping, and Retail Services at Roanoke County’s Explore Park Sealed Proposals Due: January 9, 2019 2:00 PM (Local Prevailing Time) One (1) unbound original Five (5) bound complete copies One (1) electronic copy (USB preferred) RFP #2019-058 FOOD, BEVERAGE, PROGRAMMING, RV CAMPING, & RETAIL SERVICES AT EXPLORE PARK GENERAL INFORMATION Roanoke County is seeking proposals from qualified firms to provide a plan for the development and management, use, and operation of food, beverage, gas, programming , RV camping, and retail services at Explore Park in Roanoke, Virginia. A non-mandatory Pre-Proposal meeting will be held at 3:00 pm on November 28, 2018, at the Arthur Taubman Center located at 56 Roanoke River Parkway Rd, Blue Ridge Parkway Milepost 115, Roanoke, VA 24014. It is recommended that those intending to submit a proposal attend this meeting. Parks, Recreation and Tourism staff will make a brief presentation and be available for questions. One unbound original, five (5) bound complete copies and one electronic copy (USB preferred) of the proposals, in a sealed envelope/package, will be received at and until January 9, 2019, at 2:00 PM (local prevailing time), in the Roanoke County Purchasing Division at 5204 Bernard Drive, Suite 300F, Roanoke, Virginia 24018. NO faxed proposals will be accepted. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that its proposal is received in the Purchasing Division by the above date and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacteria Tmdls for Wilson Creek, Ore Branch and Roanoke River Watersheds, Virginia
    Bacteria TMDLs for Wilson Creek, Ore Branch and Roanoke River Watersheds, Virginia Submitted by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Prepared by and 2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 February 2006 Bacteria TMDLs for Wilson Creek, Ore Branch and Roanoke River Watersheds Executive Summary This report presents the development of Bacteria TMDLs for the Wilson Creek, Ore Branch and Roanoke River watersheds, located in the Upper Roanoke River Basin. Segments of Wilson Creek, Ore Branch and the Roanoke River were listed as impaired on Virginia’s 1998 303(d) Total Maximum Daily Load Priority List and Report (DEQ, 1998) because of violations of the state’s water quality standard for fecal coliform bacteria. These segments were also included on Virginia’s 2002 303(d) Report on Impaired Waters and 2004 305(b)/303(d) Water Quality Assessment Integrated Report. The impaired segments are located in the Upper Roanoke River Basin in southwestern Virginia. Description of the Study Area Wilson Creek is a tributary to the North Fork Roanoke River and is located in Montgomery County, while Ore Branch is a tributary to the Roanoke River and flows from Roanoke County into Roanoke City. The impaired segment of the Roanoke River begins in Salem City and flows through Roanoke City into Roanoke County. All three streams are located in the Upper Roanoke River Basin (USGS Cataloging Unit 03010101). The watershed is approximately 371,658 acres (580 square miles) and drains portions of Floyd, Montgomery, Roanoke, Botetourt, Bedford and Franklin Counties and all of Salem and Roanoke Cities. Bacteria TMDLs have already been approved for five impaired streams in the watershed: Carvin Creek, Glade Creek, Laymantown Creek, Lick Run and Tinker Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Ridge Parkway Long-Range Interpretive Plan Was Approved by Your Memorandum, Undated
    6o/%. .G3/ . B LU E R IDG E PAR KWAY r . v BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE . ;HNICAL INFOR1uA1-!ON CENTER `VFR SERVICE CENTER Z*'K PARK SERVICE 2^/ C^QZ003 United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Harpers Ferry Center P.O. Box 50 IN REPLY REFER TO: Harpers Ferry, West Virginia 25425-0050 K1817(HFC-IP) BLRI 'JAN 3 0 2003 Memorandum To: Superintendent, Blue Ridge Parkway From: Associate Manager, Interpretive Planning, Harpers Ferry Center Subject: Distribution of Approved Long-Range Interpretive Plan for Blue Ridge Parkway The Blue Ridge Parkway Long-Range Interpretive Plan was approved by your memorandum, undated. All changes noted in the memorandum have been incorporated in this final document. Twenty bound copies are being sent to you with this memorandum, along with one unbound copy for your use in making additional copies as needed in the future. We have certainly appreciated the fine cooperation and help of your staff on this project. Enclosure (21) Copy to: Patty Lockamy, Chief of Interpretation bcc: HFC-Files HFC-Dailies HFC - Keith Morgan (5) HFC - Sam Vaughn HFC - Dixie Shackelford Corky Mayo, WASO HFC - John Demer HFC- Ben Miller HFC - Anne Tubiolo HFC-Library DSC-Technical Information Center K.Morgan/lmt/1-29-03 0 • LONG-RANGE INTERPRETIVE PLAN BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY 2002 prepared by Department of the Interior National Park Service Blue Ridge Parkway Branch of Interpretation Harpers Ferry Center Interpretive Planning 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS M INTRODUCTION ..........................................1 BACKGROUND FOR PLANNING ...........................3 PARKWAY PURPOSE .......................................4 RESOURCE SIGNIFICANCE ................................5 THEMES ..................................................9 0 MISSION GOALS .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Herpetological Survey of Dixie Caverns and Explore Park in Roanoke, Virginia and the Wehrle’S Salamander
    A Herpetological Survey of Dixie Caverns and Explore Park in Roanoke, Virginia and the Wehrle’s Salamander Matthew Neff Department of Herpetology National Zoological Park Smithsonian Institution MRC 5507, Washington, DC 20013 Introduction The Virginia Herpetological Society (VHS) Dixie Caverns Survey was held at Dixie Caverns and Explore Park in Roanoke County, Virginia on 24 September 2016. According to legend, Dixie Caverns was discovered in 1920 by two young men after their dog Dixie fell through a hole that led to the caves. In honor of their dog’s discovery, they decided to name the caverns Dixie. One of those boys was Bill “Shorty” McDaniel who would later go on to work at the caverns for more than 50 years and was known fondly for his sometimes embellished stories (Berrier, 2014). In actuality, the presence of Dixie Caverns, according to The Roanoke Times, was known as early as 1860 and had been mapped in the early 1900’s (Berrier, 2014). Guided tours of the caverns began in 1923 and still occur today with about 30,000 people visiting annually (Berrier, 2014). Dixie Caverns is located in Roanoke County which is in the Valley and Ridge and Blue Ridge provinces (Mitchell, 1999). A key feature of the Valley and Ridge is karst topography with soluble rocks such as limestone which create caves and caverns when weathered (Tobey, 1985). Over millions of years the caverns were formed as water dissolved the limestone that created Catesbeiana 38(1):20-36 20 Dixie Caverns and Explore Park Survey holes and even larger passageways. Many of the rock formations in Dixie Caverns are made of calcite which was formed by dripping water that evaporated leaving behind tiny particles which eventually created stalactites (Berrier, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Blue-Ridge-Parkway-Map.Pdf
    20 To Richmond 340 29 250 0 1 5 Km 10 Loft Mountain Information Center 33 CHARLOTTESVILLE 0 1 5 Miles 10 h HARRISONBURG a o d n r a e n v i e R North h S Shenandoah 250 276 National Park S (Entrance Fee) D k u y d l l 11 i e n 64 y e M 20 D t r n 256 S i o ve u Milepost along t h 20 98 Blue Ridge Parkway R iv er 340 Overlook 81 s Ch n rist i ia 29 a n t Tunnel under 13 feet s n u (located near southern o end of parkway) Rockfish Gap M C r 1900ft No direct access e 254 n e a 6 to parkway k 3 F 3 Northern End of Food service WAYNESBORO Blue Ridge Parkway 3 275 11 Picnic area 6 er 250 624 iv R 42 64 631 151 STAUNTON Lodging 15 sh fi 6 ck 250 Ro Humpback Rocks Campground 664 Visitor Center 81 340 Greenstone Trail 42 10 Wintergreen 254 Ravens Roost 11 Humpback 13 Mtn 252 664 n Sherando Lake t M 814 Woods 56 y Mountain a l d To Richmond 151 n i G L 701 F I Bald 20 R T J T Mountain am E L e A E Twenty s 24 T N Minute O Cliff R i R Crabtree v T e The r H Falls T N ye Priest O M R Tye River i R v O 56 er T Gap U 56 H N T 5 A Whetstone Ridge I N Steeles 30 29 60 M Tavern O 42 151 Wigwam U 11 The Friar Falls N 26 T Yankee Horse Ridge A The Cardinal S 81 o I u N t Irish Gap h GEORGE R i 252 v Amherst e 40 r WASHINGTON NATIONAL 23 Whites Gap T 39 Overlook FOREST 60 o b 2567ft a c 29 42 c 39 o BUENA Indian Gap R Forge 5 o Monroe VISTA w To Petersburg Mountain M 50 o er u iv n R t 460 39 ury 60 a 60 Ma in 6 130 64 20 Little R r House LEXINGTON Otter Creek James ive Mountain 10 Bluff 42 Mtn 60 Big House 501 Lowest Elevation 501 Mountain on Parkway 649ft
    [Show full text]
  • Vision 2040: Amendments and Administrative Modifications
    Vision 2040: Amendments and Administrative Modifications The Constrained Long-Range Multimodal Transportation Plan, Vision 2040: Roanoke Valley Transportation, was approved by the Roanoke Valley Transportation Planning Organization Policy Board on September 27, 2017. As such, from time to time, amendments and administrative modifications are necessary in order to reflect changes in projects, funding, or programs. For purposes of this section, and as defined in 23 Code of Federal Regulations §450.104, amendments and administrative modifications are to mean the following: Administrative modification means a minor revision to a long-range statewide or metropolitan transportation plan, Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), or Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) that includes minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to funding sources of previously included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation dates. An administrative modification is a revision that does not require public review and comment, a re-demonstration of fiscal constraint, or a conformity determination (in nonattainment and maintenance areas). Amendment means a revision to a long-range statewide or metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, or STIP that involves a major change to a project included in a metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, or STIP, including the addition or deletion of a project or a major change in project cost, project/project phase initiation dates, or a major change in design concept or design scope (e.g., changing project termini or the number of through traffic lanes or changing the number of stations in the case of fixed guideway transit projects). Changes to projects that are included only for illustrative purposes do not require an amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving the Roanoke River
    Conserving the Roanoke River Conservation Action Plan November 2005 Preface The Lower Roanoke River Project (LRRP) Conservation Plan consists of five elelments. The first of these elements is this summary report containing the key components of a written conservation action plan. The second is a Conservation Action Planning Workbook (developed by TNC using a Microsoft Excel platform) in which information about stresses, threats, strategies, and strategic success is routinely updated with conservation partners. The third is a GIS-based database including land-ownership maps and many kinds of spatial data for illustrating and evaluating various conservation scenarios. The fourth is a set of models (public policy, flow, flood, and ecological response) that allow us to evaluate the way different strategies for management of the system’s hydrology produce ecological effects. The fifth is a site protection plan consisting of priority tract maps and a spreadsheet for tracking conservation progress on each of them, as well as all of them cumulatively. In developing and revising the Conservation Plan for the Lower Roanoke over the past several years, The Nature Conservancy has utilized a series of workshops to address conservation strategies at the site scale. The goal of these workshops was to apply The Nature Conservancy’s site conservation “5-S Framework” to the Roanoke River project area, thereby developing a conservation blueprint for action and a baseline from which to measure its success over time. Primary partners in the planning process have included the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC), among others. During calendar year 2005, the TNC-NC Conservation staff revised the Roanoke plan through another series of workshops in collaboration with the Southeast Aquatic Resource Partnership (SARP).
    [Show full text]
  • Roanoke River Blueway Access Points
    h F !F ! KINZIE 4TH OAK Roanoke River BluewayMILLER RAMP HUMBERT CRAIGVALLEY WALNUT POPLAR GILLIE FIELDS KEFFER CATAWBA CREEK OLDE RT 604 SKY OLD TRAM MOUNTAIN !F MAPLE !| Blueway Access !F OAKWOOD BLUE RIDGE OAK COALING PARKVIEW BUGLE INTERSTATESIMMONS 81 FLINT SPRING HOLLOW ` 648 DOVE _ Æ SCALYBARK Hazard/Portage GIBSON RIDGE DEREK APACHE ÿ CASEY WATES CALDER RIDGE CARVINS COVE DOGAN LULA SUMMIT h TIMER PINE USGS Stream Gage RESERVOIR LAKEVIEW STONEBRIDGE MOUNTAIN PASS BRADSHAW BRYANT JENSEN N & W 2ND LACEY KIDDER LONGWOOD ¹ ALLTREE CATAWBA VALLEY!F WINDFALL !F VDGIF Birding & Wildlife Site UPDIKE MORNING DOVE INTERSTATE 81 HUNTERS FOXCROFT BLUEBIRD CLOVERDALE LEE COUGAR LAYMANTOWN BENDING OAK CHASE KEATON ANGEL DAN LAKERIDGE C FACULTY VISTA River/Stream MOORE AUTUMN GANDER a COOK DEER FAIRFIELD LOMAN r ENON v INDUSTRIAL COLONIAL in BRITISH WOODS I81 TOAD CLOVERDALE Carvins Cove BELLE HAVEN s RICHARDSON Stocked Trout Waters !F LILA MCINTOSH C HOPE FILLY APPLE Natural Reserve LABAN r STAYMAN e WILLIAMSON SHADWELL ARCHWAY SOFT e YORK TIMBERVIEW CALVERT HITECH k CAROLINA POST OAK GreenwayARABIAN BARRENS INDIAN TERESA KNOLLWOOD ALPINE PARK HUNTERS WEBSTER NEWPORT OLSEN WILLIAMSONDEXTER HUGH ROYCE Blue Ridge Parkway Loch Haven WEST Havens Wildlife Management Area JANEE VIVIAN EAST SERENITY BOXLEY HOLLINS WOOD HAVEN Botetourt County CRESTLAND QUAIL DOE RAY Road I81 BUCK MANOR SANDYRIDGE DUTCH OVEN HEDGELAWN OAKLANDELDEN THIRLANE OLD MOUNTAIN NELL DENT ROME LOCH HAVEN SHORE AIRPORT TINY CAPITO FLORIST SIERRA Interstate 00.5 1 2 RAM DAVIS BLACKSBURG
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Tribes, 1 State: Native Americans in North Carolina
    8 Tribes, 1 State: North Carolina’s Native Peoples As of 2014, North Carolina has 8 state and federally recognized Native American tribes. In this lesson, students will study various Native American tribes through a variety of activities, from a PowerPoint led discussion, to a study of Native American art. The lesson culminates with students putting on a Native American Art Show about the 8 recognized tribes. Grade 8 Materials “8 Tribes, 1 State: Native Americans in North Carolina” PowerPoint, available here: o http://civics.sites.unc.edu/files/2014/06/NCNativeAmericans1.pdf o To view this PDF as a projectable presentation, save the file, click “View” in the top menu bar of the file, and select “Full Screen Mode”; upon completion of presentation, hit ESC on your keyboard to exit the file o To request an editable PPT version of this presentation, send a request to [email protected] “Native American Art Handouts #1 – 7”, attached North Carolina Native American Tribe handouts, attached o Lumbee o Eastern Band of Cherokee o Coharie o Haliwa-­­‑ Saponi o Meherrin o Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation o Sappony o Waccamaw Siouan “Create a Native American Art Exhibition” handout, attached “Native Americans in North Carolina Fact Sheet”, attached Brown paper or brown shopping bags (for the culminating project) Graph paper (for the culminating project) Art supplies (markers, colored pencils, crayons, etc. Essential Questions: What was life like for Native Americans before the arrival of Europeans? What happened to most Native American tribes after European arrival? What hardships have Native Americans faced throughout their history? How many state and federally recognized tribes are in North Carolina today? Duration 90 – 120 minutes Teacher Preparation A note about terminology: For this lesson, the descriptions Native American and American Indian are 1 used interchangeably when referring to more than one specific tribe.
    [Show full text]