Social Representations of Self and Society. a Cross-Cultural Investigation in Britain and Japan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS OF SELF AND SOCIETY. A CROSS-CULTURAL INVESTIGATION IN BRITAIN AND JAPAN Yukiko Kuwahara Thesis submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Department of Psychology School of Human Sciences University of Surrey November 2004 1 Summary The theory of Individualism and Collectivism (I-C) has been pervasively used in the cross-cultural investigation as a dimension, making a typology of culture. In this project, cross-cultural differences were investigated in how people talk about their society and how the meanings of self are constructed among British and Japanese nationals, from the perspective of Social Representation Theory (Moscovici, 1984, 1988, 1998, 2001). Moreover, how individualistic and collectivistic characteristics are reflected in such representations was investigated. The approach to identity, proposed by Chryssochoou (2003), which assumes a cyclical relationship among Self-knowledge, Self-claim and Recognition to construct the sense of self, was used to investigate social representation of identity. Three empirical studies were conducted in order to investigate representation of society and identity. The first study investigated the social context in which the meaning of self is constructed and the 'Self-knowledge'. A series of semi-structured interviews were performed with British and Japanese women in order to elicit the belief about the society and success. Data was analysed by Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (Smith, 1996), in order to understand participants' subjective experience of their society and success. The second study investigated the 'Self-claim' and the social norms reflected in the way people describe themselves in different contexts. 11 Twenty Statement Test (Kuhn and McPartland, 1954) was used to elicit 10 self-expressions from 106 British and 151 Japanese women university students. Half of the participants were asked to present themselves to their close friends, and the others, to their co-workers. Self-expressions were categorised into I dioce ntric, Allocentric, and Group self-references (Bochner, 1994) and positive, negative and neutral self-evaluations (Watkins and Gerong, 1997) in order to identify I-e elements in their self-expressions and to study cross-cultural differences in Self-claims. The third study investigated social representation of a person and how people conventionally recognise other people among 169 British and 288 Japanese women university students. Participants were presented with 4 self-expressions of a hypothetical person. Self-expressions were manipulated by ldiocentric, Allocentric and Group self-references (Bochner, 1994) in order to elicit the representation of an 'individualistic' or a 'collectivistic' person. Participants were asked to make judgment about this person in a series of questions. The evaluation of the fictitious person was expected to reveal the social norm which regulated the wayan individualistic or a collectivistic person was accepted in British and Japanese societies. Results from three empirical studies showed consistent meanings given to society and self and cyclical relationships between Self-knowledge, Self-claim and Recognition to construct the sense of self. These studies also identified both individualistic and collectivistic properties in British III and Japanese society to uniquely characterise their cultures. The findings from this thesis supported the importance of meanings given to the social world and the ability of SRT to advance the knowledge in the area of cross . cultural study. IV Contents Summary .........................................................................................i Contents ........................................................................................iv Index of Tables .................................................................................xi Index of Figures .............................................................................xiv Acknowledgements ..........................................................................xv Chapter 1: Overview of the thesis ........................................................ 1 Chapter 2: Individualism and Collectivism ............................................ 7 Theory of Individualism and Collectivism ................................................ 9 The common sense understandings of the social world and individualistic and collectivistic orientation...................................................................... 19 Issues overlooked in the theory of Individualism and Collectivism ............. 25 ~ The issue of variation among societies categorised either as individualistic or as collectivistic societies ....................................... 25 ~ The issue of social change .............................................................27 ~ The issue of meaning given to surroundings.................................... 30 Investigation of the common sense knowledge about social world and self... 35 Chapter 3: Social Representation Theory ............................................. 39 Social representation theory ............................................................... 39 Application of Social Representation Theory to this thesis ........................ 46 ~ The issue of variety within societies ............................................... 46 ~ The issue of social change ............................................................. 48 ~ The issue of meaning given to the social world ................................. 49 ~ Theoretical framework to investigate social norm in identity .............. 52 Chapter 4: The meaning given to self and identity.............................. 55 Cross' cultural research of identity between individualistic and collectivistic societies ............................................................................................ 55 Application of theoretical perspectives of Social Representation to the investigation of identity ...................................................................... 60 How are the cross'cultural differences in the meanings given to identity between British and Japanese society investigated in this thesis: the Approach to identity: Self' knowledge, Self·claim and Recognition (Chryssochoou, 2003) ....................................................................... ·· .66 v » Investigation of social context, recognition, and claim about the self to study meanings given to identity in different societies ...................... 66 » Self as a social representation in the approach to identity by Chryssochoou (2003) .................................................................... 68 Chapter 5: Rationale ........................................................................ 72 Chapter 6: Study 1: Representations of Society and Success in Individualistic and Collectivistic Countries. A Cross·cultural Qualitative Study with British and Japanese Women ............................................ 77 Introduction...................................................................................... 77 Method ............................................................................................. 84 » Participants ...............................................................................84 » Interview schedule ...................................................................... 84 » RIC scale ...................................................................................84 » Procedure ..................................................................................85 » Analysis .................................................................................... 86 -¢- Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) and epistemology ............................ " .......................................... 86 -¢- Analysts' position.................................................................. 88 -¢- Analytic Procedure ............................................................... 89 Analysis and Discussion ..................................................................... 91 » Topics and Themes found for each cultural group ............................. 91 » How people talked about their society .............................................93 -¢- Japanese: Division between public and private spheres ............ 93 -¢- British: Division between social classes .................................. 97 » The important qualities in close interpersonal relationships ..............99 -¢- Japanese: Emphasis is on harmony, empathy and intemalisation of others perceptions.............................................................. 99 -¢- British: The importance of interdependence and the priority of others in the context of family values. The importance of communication, acceptance of individual differences and personal space in interpersonal relationships among family members ...... 102 » Perception of Success ................................................................. 109 -¢- Japanese: The interpersonal network, compatibility to social needs, social recognition and money ................................................ 109 -¢- British success: Personal effort, innate ability, money, realisation of one's dream, and independence ............................................. 113 VI , Perception of failure .................................................................. 119 -9- Japanese: How homelessness represents a lack of financial independence and lack of effort ('they deserve what they get' Lerner: