DOCSLIB.ORG

Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308163574 Adult behaviour and early stages of Lycaena ochimus (Herrich-Schäffer [1851]) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Article · January 1996 CITATIONS READS 7 154 2 authors: Klaus G. Schurian Konrad Fiedler University of Vienna 12 PUBLICATIONS 124 CITATIONS 303 PUBLICATIONS 8,677 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Herbivore communities in the Andean mountain forest zone – comparisons within selected plant species along contrasting environmental dimensions View project Biodiversity and ecology of tropical mountain rainforests View project All content following this page was uploaded by Konrad Fiedler on 16 September 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. • Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N.F. 16 (4): 329-343 (1996) 329 Adult behaviour and early stages of Lycaena ochimus (HERRICH-SCHAFFER [1851]) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Klaus G. SCHURIAN und Konrad FIEDLER Dr. Klaus G. SCHURIA N, Am Mannstein 13, D-65779 Ke lkheim-Fischbach, Germany Dr. Konrad FI EDLER, Lehrstuhl fUr Verhaltensphysiologie und Soziobiologie, Theodor-Boveri­ Biozentrum, Unive rsitat Wurzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany Abstract: Field observations on behaviour and a subsequent rearing are de­ scribed for the Anatolian copper butterfly Lycaena ochimus. Males are prot­ androus, territorial and use perching as mate-locating strategy. Females often refuse co urting males, matings occur in the late morning until noon. Egg-lay­ ing was observed between 10.30 and 15.00 h during hot, sunny weather. Fe­ males lay their eggs singly on the inflorescences of Acantholimon species (Plumbaginaceae). In captivity, one larva accepted Polygonum lapathifolium (Polygonaceae) as substitute food and was reared until adult eclosion. The early stages are described for the first time and compared with the morpho­ logically similar L. thetis, which also uses Acantholimon hostplants. Neither adult behaviour nor morphology of the early stages indicate that L. ochimus, together with the taxa traditionally placed in a "subgenus Thersamonia" , would constitute a phylogenetically justifiable monophyletic unit. Phylogene­ tic implications of hostplant shifts from Polygonaceae to Plumbaginaceae are discussed. lmaginalverhalten und Biologie der Praimaginalstadien von Lycaena ochimus (HERRICH-SCHAFFER [1851]) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) Zusammenfassung: Beobachtungen zum Imaginalverhalten von Lycaena ochimus vom August 1994 aus der Umgebung des zentralti.irkischen Ortes Saimbeyli (1400-1600 m i.i. NN) werden berichtet. Mannliche Falter hielten am spaten Vormittag in einer weitgehend ausgetrockneten Erosionsrinne Partien von etwa 10 Meter Lange als Reviere besetzt. Weibchen wurden dort nur vereinzelt gesehen, 4 Paare wurden in Kopula beobachtet. Offenbar be­ reits begattete Weibchen flogen vor allem auf einem si.idexponierten, an mehreren Stellen dicht mit Acantholimon-Polstern (Plumbaginaceae) bestan­ den en Hang. Wahrend der heiBen Mittagsstunden wurde viermal die Eiabla­ ge an den Bli.itenstanden einer Acantholimon-Art beobachtet, 2 weitere Eiab­ lagen erfolgten in Gefangenschaft. Aus insgesamt vier erhaltenen Eiern (Durchmesser 0,8 mm) schli.ipften Larven, denen in Deutschland als Ersatz­ futterpflanze Polygonum lapathifolium L. (Ampferknoterich, Polygonaceae) angeboten wurde. Nur eine-Raupe entwickelte sich auf diesem Ersatzfutter vollstandig und ergab im Oktober desselben Jahres ein Mannchen. Die im letzten Stadium weitgehend zeichnungslosen gri.inen Larven haben weder ein Nektarorgan noch aussti.ilpbare Tentakelorgane und sind denen von Lycaena • 330 thetis (KL UG 1834) sehr ahnlich. Die gedrungene Puppe ist dunkelbraun und besitzt zahlreiche Trompetenhaare, aber nur wenige dendritische Haare. Po­ r e nkupp e l o r ga l~e sind bei der Altraupe verstreut uber das ganze Integument, auf der Puppe vo r all em im Umkreis der Stigmen anzutreffe n. Bei Storung produzierte die Puppe zwei verschi edene Schall ko mponenten. Weder Imagi­ nalverhalten noch Praimaginalmorphologie ergeben Hinweise auf di e Mono­ phyli e der tradi tionell als "Untergattung Thersamonia" zusammengefaBten Arten. Die phylogenetischen Implikationen eines Raupenfutterpflanzenwech­ sels vo n Polygo naceen zu Plumbaginaceen werden di sku tiert. Introduction In 1851, HERRICH-SCHAFFER described Lycaena ochimus' (original combina­ tion: Polyommatus ochimus HERRI CH-SCHAFF ER [1 851]) and listed this new taxon between L. thersamon and L. alciphron gordius, thus indicating the inclusion of ochimus to the copper butterflies (tribe Lycaenini). Type locality of ochimus is "Asia minor", the type series is apparently lost (HES ­ SELBA RTH et a1. 1995 ). It is probable that HERRI CH-SCHAFFE R received his type material via KAO EN from Amasya (northern central Turkey), a locality which th e collector Albert KI NOERMANN repeatedly visited in the middle of the nineteenth century (LEDE RER 1860) . L. ochimus occurs in Asia minor, extending from Anatolia southwards to the Lebanon and Syria (Mt. Hermon), and eastwards through Azerbaijan to northern Iran (Elburs mountains) and the Caucasus region (LARSEN 1974, NEKRUTE NKO 1977, SCHURI AN 8( HOFMANN 1982, BENYAMI NI 1990, HESSELBARTH et a1. 1995). This butterfly is bivoltine at lower elevations (1 " gen .: May-June, 2nd gen.: late July- September), but univoltine at higher altitudes (i. e., above 1700 m a. s.1.) . The vertical distribution of L. ochimus ranges from 500 to 2800 m , but the majority of localities lies between 1000 and 2000 m (HESSE LBARTH et a1. 1995 ). Besides scant notes on nectaring on flowers, almost nothing appears to be known on the biology and beh aviour of L. ochimus except that the male butterflies aggressively defend "territories" around perch es (SCHURI AN 8( HOFMAN N 1982, HESSELBARTH et a1. 1995). Therefore, the senior author spent considerable effort to elucidate the life-cycle of this Anatolian cop- 'SCHURIAN & H OFMANN (1982) and H ESSE LBA RT H et al. (1995) di sc.ussed the nomenclatural aspeC1s of the names ochimus, phaeton FREYER [1850] and kefersteinii GERHARD [185 1]. To mainJain nomen­ datural stability, preference of the widely used name ochimus over the sli ghtly older, but forgollen name phaeton is again strongly recomm ended. • 331 per butterfly since the late seventies. However, this intention was not suc­ cessfully realized until 1994, when an unusually early onset of the flight period of the second generation allowed us to observe L. ochimus in early August in numbers. During the past few years it has been shown that the predominantly Ana­ tolian species Lycaena thetis (ToLMAN 1993, FIEDLER & SCHURIAN 1994) and the central Asian L. solskyi (LUKHTANOV & LUKHTANOV 1994) use spiny cushion plants of the genus Acantholimon (Plumbaginaceae) as larval hostplants. Therefore, we were particularly interested in the hostplant relationships of L. ochimus. Does this species also feed on Acantholimon, or does it show the Polygonaceae affiliation which is typical for most Ly­ caenini species? Observations on adult behaviour In 1994 the flight period of the second generation of L. ochimus started around 20. VII. near Saimbeyli (Prov. Adana, 1500 m a. s.1.), compared to the appearance of the first males in early August in 1988 or 1993. Whell we visited Saimbeyli again on 7./8. VIII. 1994, wing wear of male L. ochi­ mus butterflies indicated that the flight period of the second generation had already advanced. As other Lycaena species and many other temper­ ate-zone butterflies, L. ochimus is protandrous (males emerge earlier than females: e.g. WIKLUND et a1. 1992), but females were also already present in numbers. Therefore, we expected to meet mated females ready for ovi­ position in the habitat. More than 30 males were seen along a dry eroded gutter, where they sat perching on flowers. The males often chased other butterflies (and even other non-lepidopterous insects) passing by, but usually returned to their perches within a few seconds. When a male encountered a female nectar­ ing on a flower, he courted her with vibrating or flicking wings, but in all cases that we observed the female rejected him with rapid wing move­ ments or flew off. We found 4 mating pairs sitting in copula in the vegetation, all in the late morning (around 10.00-11.30 local time). When disturbed, the male car­ rying the female flew away over-a distance of some 5-10 m. Then the pair settled down again in the vegetation. On one occasion (11.30 on 8. VIII.) a second male tried to penetrate into a pair in copula, but without success. • 332 • 333 Figs. 1-2: Lycaena ochimus, male, dorsal and ve ntral view . Locality data: Turkei/Adana, vie. Saimbeyli, 1500-1600 m, 12. x.1994 (e.o.), wing span: 26.5 mm.' Figs . 3-4: L. ochimus, fe­ male, dorsal and ventra l view. Locality data see above, w ing span: 27. 0 mm. Fig. 5-6: L, of L. ochimus, dorsal and lateral view, length ca . 7 mm. Fig. 7: L, of L. ochimus, dorsolateral view, length ca. 12 mm. (P hotographs 1-7: K. G. SCHUR IAN). Fig . 8: Acantholimon cushion in full flower, the hostplant of L. ochimus. A~kale (Prov. Erzin­ ~an), 3. VIII. 1994. Fig. 9: Egg of L. ochimus on Acantholimon flower sp ike. Saimbeyli, 8. VIII. 1994. (Photographs 8-9: K. FIEDLER.) Fig. 10: L. ochimus, pupa, length: 10 mm (Photograph: K. G. SCHURIAN). • 334 During the hottest hours around noon, females were often seen to fly across the vegetation, apparently in search for hostplants, whereas males mostly engaged in nectaring on flowers at that time of the day. Females preferred south-facing slopes with open and partly sparse vegetation. Be­ sides single conifer trees (e.g. juniperus excelsa BlEB.) and various thorny shrubs, the ground was mostly covered by spiny cushion plants like A stra­ cantha PODLECH (Fabaceae) and Acantholimon BOISS. (Plumbaginaceae) species (Fig. 8; see KURSCHNER et al. 1995 for details on the vegetation of the Toros Daglari). Females often stayed near Acantholimon cushions. We also observed them nectaring on the pink Acantholimon flowers. Around 13.00 local time (7 .
Recommended publications
  • Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and Its Buffer Zone

    Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and Its Buffer Zone

    Fr a g m e n t a Fa u n ist ic a 51 (2): 107-118, 2008 PL ISSN 0015-9301 O M u seu m a n d I n s t i t u t e o f Z o o l o g y PAS Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and its buffer zone Izabela DZIEKAŃSKA* and M arcin SlELEZNlEW** * Department o f Applied Entomology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776, Warszawa, Poland; e-mail: e-mail: [email protected] **Department o f Invertebrate Zoology, Institute o f Biology, University o f Białystok, Świerkowa 2OB, 15-950 Białystok, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Kampinos National Park is the second largest protected area in Poland and therefore a potentially important stronghold for biodiversity in the Mazovia region. However it has been abandoned as an area of lepidopterological studies for a long time. A total number of 80 butterfly species were recorded during inventory studies (2005-2008), which proved the occurrence of 80 species (81.6% of species recorded in the Mazovia voivodeship and about half of Polish fauna), including 7 from the European Red Data Book and 15 from the national red list (8 protected by law). Several xerothermophilous species have probably become extinct in the last few decadesColias ( myrmidone, Pseudophilotes vicrama, Melitaea aurelia, Hipparchia statilinus, H. alcyone), or are endangered in the KNP and in the region (e.g. Maculinea arion, Melitaea didyma), due to afforestation and spontaneous succession. Higrophilous butterflies have generally suffered less from recent changes in land use, but action to stop the deterioration of their habitats is urgently needed.
  • Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895

    Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895

    Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. S, P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2). (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4594 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann) - a national effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae residing at the Oregon State Arthropod Collection as of March 2019. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version will be replaced in the near future with an official release (version 1.0), which will be archived as a supplemental file to this paper. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications were confirmed by Jon Shepard and Paul Hammond prior to digitization. Nomenclature follows that of (Pelham 2008). Results The holdings in these two families are extensive. Combined, they make up 25,743 specimens (24,598 Lycanidae and 1145 Riodinidae).
  • Papilio (New Series) # 25 2016 Issn 2372-9449

    Papilio (New Series) # 25 2016 Issn 2372-9449

    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) # 25 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 ERNEST J. OSLAR, 1858-1944: HIS TRAVEL AND COLLECTION ITINERARY, AND HIS BUTTERFLIES by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. Ernest John Oslar collected more than 50,000 butterflies and moths and other insects and sold them to many taxonomists and museums throughout the world. This paper attempts to determine his travels in America to collect those specimens, by using data from labeled specimens (most in his remaining collection but some from published papers) plus information from correspondence etc. and a few small field diaries preserved by his descendants. The butterfly specimens and their localities/dates in his collection in the C. P. Gillette Museum (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado) are detailed. This information will help determine the possible collection locations of Oslar specimens that lack accurate collection data. Many more biographical details of Oslar are revealed, and the 26 insects named for Oslar are detailed. Introduction The last collection of Ernest J. Oslar, ~2159 papered butterfly specimens and several moths, was found in the C. P. Gillette Museum, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado by Paul A. Opler, providing the opportunity to study his travels and collections. Scott & Fisher (2014) documented specimens sent by Ernest J. Oslar of about 100 Argynnis (Speyeria) nokomis nokomis Edwards labeled from the San Juan Mts. and Hall Valley of Colorado, which were collected by Wilmatte Cockerell at Beulah New Mexico, and documented Oslar’s specimens of Oeneis alberta oslari Skinner labeled from Deer Creek Canyon, [Jefferson County] Colorado, September 25, 1909, which were collected in South Park, Park Co.
  • Preliminary Insect (Butterfly) Survey at Griffith Park, Los Angeles, California

    Preliminary Insect (Butterfly) Survey at Griffith Park, Los Angeles, California

    Kathy Keane October 30, 2003 Keane Biological Consulting 5546 Parkcrest Street Long Beach, CA 90808 Subject: Preliminary Insect (Butterfly) Survey at Griffith Park, Los Angeles, California. Dear Kathy: Introduction At the request of Keane Biological Consulting (KBC), Guy P. Bruyea (GPB) conducted a reconnaissance-level survey for the butterfly and insect inhabitants of Griffith Park in northwestern Los Angeles County, California. This report presents findings of our survey conducted to assess butterfly and other insect diversity within Griffith Park, and briefly describes the vegetation, topography, and present land use throughout the survey area in an effort to assess the overall quality of the habitat currently present. Additionally, this report describes the butterfly species observed or detected, and identifies butterfly species with potential for occurrence that were not detected during the present survey. All observations were made by GPB during two visits to Griffith Park in June and July 2003. Site Description Griffith Park is generally located at the east end of the Santa Monica Mountains northwest of the City of Los Angeles within Los Angeles County, California. The ± 4100-acre Griffith Park is situated within extensive commercial and residential developments associated with the City of Los Angeles and surrounding areas, and is the largest municipal park and urban wilderness area within the United States. Specifically, Griffith Park is bounded as follows: to the east by the Golden State Freeway (Interstate Highway 5) and the
  • Nevada Butterflies and Their Biology to Forward Such for Inclusion in the Larger Study

    Nevada Butterflies and Their Biology to Forward Such for Inclusion in the Larger Study

    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39(2). 1985. 95-118 NEV ADA BUTTERFLIES: PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION GEORGE T. AUSTIN Nevada State Museum and Historical Society, 700 Twin Lakes Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 ABSTRACT. The distribution by county of the 189 species (over 300 taxa) of but­ terflies occurring in Nevada is presented along with a list of species incorrectly recorded for the state. There are still large areas which are poorly or not collected. Nevada continues as one of the remaining unknown areas in our knowledge of butterfly distribution in North America. Although a com­ prehensive work on the state's butterflies is in preparation, there is sufficient demand for a preliminary checklist to justify the following. It is hoped this will stimulate those who have any data on Nevada butterflies and their biology to forward such for inclusion in the larger study. Studies of Nevada butterflies are hampered by a paucity of resident collectors, a large number of mountain and valley systems and vast areas with little or no access. Non-resident collectors usually funnel into known and well worked areas, and, although their data are valu­ able, large areas of the state remain uncollected. Intensive collecting, with emphasis on poorly known areas, over the past seven years by Nevada State Museum personnel and associates has gone far to clarify butterfly distribution within the state. The gaps in knowledge are now more narrowly identifiable and will be filled during the next few sea­ sons. There is no all encompassing treatment of Nevada's butterfly fauna. The only state list is an informal recent checklist of species (Harjes, 1980).
  • How Much Biodiversity Is in Natura 2000?

    How Much Biodiversity Is in Natura 2000?

    Alterra Wageningen UR Alterra Wageningen UR is the research institute for our green living environment. P.O. Box 47 We off er a combination of practical and scientifi c research in a multitude of How much Biodiversity is in Natura 2000? 6700 AA Wageningen disciplines related to the green world around us and the sustainable use of our living The Netherlands environment, such as fl ora and fauna, soil, water, the environment, geo-information The “Umbrella Eff ect” of the European Natura 2000 protected area network T +31 (0) 317 48 07 00 and remote sensing, landscape and spatial planning, man and society. www.wageningenUR.nl/en/alterra The mission of Wageningen UR (University & Research centre) is ‘To explore Technical report Alterra Report 2730B the potential of nature to improve the quality of life’. Within Wageningen UR, ISSN 1566-7197 nine specialised research institutes of the DLO Foundation have joined forces with Wageningen University to help answer the most important questions in the Theo van der Sluis, Ruud Foppen, Simon Gillings, Thomas Groen, René Henkens, Stephan Hennekens, domain of healthy food and living environment. With approximately 30 locations, 6,000 members of staff and 9,000 students, Wageningen UR is one of the leading Kim Huskens, David Noble, Fabrice Ottburg, Luca Santini, Henk Sierdsema, Andre van Kleunen, organisations in its domain worldwide. The integral approach to problems and Joop Schaminee, Chris van Swaay, Bert Toxopeus, Michiel Wallis de Vries and Lawrence Jones-Walters the cooperation between the various disciplines
  • Biodiversity of Butterflies (Rhopalocera, Hesperiidae and Zygaenidae) Into the Future Biosphere Reserve in Val Müstair (Graubünden) – the Populations of Val Mora

    Biodiversity of Butterflies (Rhopalocera, Hesperiidae and Zygaenidae) Into the Future Biosphere Reserve in Val Müstair (Graubünden) – the Populations of Val Mora

    School of Biology Biodiversity of butterflies (Rhopalocera, Hesperiidae and Zygaenidae) into the future biosphere reserve in Val Müstair (Graubünden) – the populations of Val Mora Master Thesis of Science in Behaviour, Evolution and Conservation by Angélique DUVOISIN Direction: Prof. Daniel Cherix and Dr Yves Gonseth Department of Ecology and Evolution Swiss Center of Cartography of the Fauna, Neuchâtel January 2010 Abstract I. Introduction p.4 II. Material and methods p.5 II.1. General – Study area p.5 II.2. Localisation and choice of the sites p.7 II.3. Sites description p.8 II.4. Floristic approach p.11 II.5. Sampling method p.12 II.6. Data treatment p.13 II.6.1. Simpson’s diversity index p.13 II.6.2. Correspondences Factorial Analysis (CFA) p.13 III. Results p.14 III.1. Global results p.14 III.2. Results by station p.18 III.3. Simpson’s diversity index p.21 III.4. CFA p.21 IV. Discussion p.22 IV.1. Generalities p.22 IV.2. CFA and detailed discussion p.24 IV.3. Comparison with the Swiss National Park p.26 IV.4. Livestock and Rhopalocera p.27 V. Conclusive remarks p.27 VI. Acknowledgments p.28 VII. Bibliography p.29 Annexes p.31 2 Abstract The aim of this study is to give a first description of the Rhopalocera communities of a region of the future Biosphere reserve Val Müstair-Swiss National Park: Val Mora. The methodology applied here is based on two complementary approaches. The first qualitative approach consists in identifying every species on a 1ha wide surface and gives information about the specific diversity.
  • Cumulative Index of the Bulletin of the Oregon Entomological Society

    Cumulative Index of the Bulletin of the Oregon Entomological Society

    Cumulative Index of the Bulletin of the Oregon Entomological Society PDF available at http://odonata.bogfoot.net/oes/OES_Bulletin_Index.pdf Last updated: January 4, 2021 At this point, the Index is only for the issues available electronically. Production of electronic issues in the form of PDF files began with the Spring 2011 issue. The Bulletin was printed between 1939 and 2003. It is our intent to index the printed issues as time permits, and add them to this listing. All but the most recent five printed issues are available in the Valley Library of the OSU Campus in Corvallis, Oregon. It is hoped that this index will make the Bulletin more useful to its readers. Note: The online version of the Bulletin of the Oregon Entomological Society ran for 10 years, from Spring 2011 until Winter 2020. Ron Lyons and Jim Johnson were the editors throughout the period. No new editor was available to take over for the Spring 2021 issue so publication was suspended indefinitely. —The Editors Spring 2011 From the Editors 1 The OES Logo 2 On the Need for a Bibliography of Oregon Insects and Their Relatives Ron Lyons 2 Life in Winter Ponds Along the Coast Ron Lyons 3 NPPNW, Spring 2011 Meeting [announcement, * text says 2001] 3 The 2011 North American Forest Insect Work Conference (NAFIWIC) [meeting announcement] 3 Lepidoptera News 4 New Population of Tailed Copper (Lycaena arota) Dana Ross 4 33rd Annual Pacific Northwest Lepidopterists’ Workshop: 29–30 October 2011 [meeting 4 announcement] Some moths new to Oregon Dana Ross 4 In Progress: Pacific Northwest
  • Phylogeny of European Butterflies V1.0

    Phylogeny of European Butterflies V1.0

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/844175; this version posted November 16, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. A complete time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny of the European butterflies Martin Wiemers1,2*, Nicolas Chazot3,4,5, Christopher W. Wheat6, Oliver Schweiger2, Niklas Wahlberg3 1Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalder Straße 90, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany 2UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor- Lieser-Str. 4, 06120 Halle, Germany 3Department of Biology, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden 4Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. 5Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. 6Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden *corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] Abstract With the aim of supporting ecological analyses in butterflies, the third most species-rich superfamily of Lepidoptera, this paper presents the first time-calibrated phylogeny of all 496 extant butterfly species in Europe, including 18 very localized endemics for which no public DNA sequences had been available previously. It is based on a concatenated alignment of the mitochondrial gene COI and up to 11 nuclear gene fragments, using Bayesian inference of phylogeny. To avoid analytical biases that could result from our region-focus sampling, our European tree was grafted upon a global genus- level backbone butterfly phylogeny for analyses. In addition to a consensus tree, we provide the posterior distribution of trees and the fully-concatenated alignment for future analyses.
  • USGS DDS-43, Status of Butterflies

    USGS DDS-43, Status of Butterflies

    ARTHUR M. SHAPIRO Center for Population Biology University of California Davis, California 27 Status of Butterflies ABSTRACT alpine fell fields). Most of the Sierra is forested, yet most of its butterfly diversity is not found in the forest—a fact first noted The Sierra Nevada has an unusually rich butterfly fauna that, how- by Emmel and Emmel (1963b). ever, is distinguished by little endemism at either species or subspe- Butterflies are important for biodiversity and conservation cies levels. This may change soon, as more taxonomic subspecies biology because they are diverse enough that patterns in dis- are named. The fauna is structured altitudinally, latitudinally, and be- tribution and diversity are demonstrable; their taxonomy is tween east and west slopes. Maximum species richness occurs at in relatively good shape, at least compared with that of most middle elevations on the west slope and around lower passes. En- other invertebrates; they include both ecological generalists demism and relictualism are concentrated at high elevation (subal- and specialists, with some of these specialists tied to unusual pine and alpine) and on unusual soils at lower elevations. Some patterns and/or endangered habitats; they often have close and poten- of endemism and relictualism suggest a very dynamic biogeography tially coevolved relationships with larval host plants and some- in the Quaternary period, further supported by phylogeographic (ge- times with adult nectar sources; they are relatively easy to study netic) studies. The historic butterfly record is so poor that the effects of and are large enough to be marked individually (and are iden- land use and management on the fauna can only be guessed at.
  • Volume 44 2011

    Volume 44 2011

    the journal Research ON T LEPIDOPTERA VOLUME 44 2011 ISSN 0022 4324 (PRINT) 2156 5457 (ONLINE) THE LEPIDOPTERA RESEARCH FOUNDATION The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera www.lepidopteraresearchfoundation.org ISSN 0022 4324 (print) 2156 5457 (online) Published by: The Lepidoptera Research Foundation, Inc. 9620 Heather Road Beverly Hills, California 90210-1757 TEL (310) 274 1052 E-mail: Editorial: [email protected] Technical: [email protected] Founder: William Hovanitz (1915-1977) Editorial Staff: Konrad Fiedler, University of Vienna, Editor [email protected] Nancy R. Vannucci, info manager [email protected] Associate Editors: Annette Aiello, Smithsonian Institution [email protected] Joaquin Baixeras, Universitat de Valencia [email protected] Marcelo Duarte, Universidade de Sao Paulo [email protected] Klaus Fischer, University of Greifswald [email protected] Krushnamegh Kunte, Natl. Center for Biol. Sci, India [email protected] Gerardo Lamas, Universidad Mayor de San Marcos [email protected] Rudi Mattoni [email protected] Soren Nylin, Stockholm University [email protected] Naomi Pierce, Harvard University [email protected] Robert Robbins, Smithsonian Institution [email protected] Daniel Rubinoff, University of Hawaii [email protected] Josef Settele, Helmholtz Cntr. for Environ. Research-UFZ [email protected] Arthur M. Shapiro, University of California - Davis [email protected] Felix Sperling, University of Alberta [email protected] Niklas Wahlberg, University of Turku [email protected] Shen Horn Yen, National Sun Yat-Sen University [email protected] Manuscripts and notices material must be sent to the editor, Konrad Fiedler [email protected]. Please note the instructions to authors on the back inside cover of this Journal and online at www.lepidopteraresearchfoundation.org.
  • U·M·I University Microfilms International a Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road

    U·M·I University Microfilms International a Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road

    Factors determining host plant range in two lycaenid butterflies. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Carey, David Brennan. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 11/10/2021 04:37:00 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185907 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs~ print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.