DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture 28: Vector Bundles and Fiber Bundles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture 28: Vector Bundles and Fiber Bundles LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES 1. Vector Bundles In general, smooth manifolds are very \non-linear". However, there exist many smooth manifolds which admit very nice \partial linear structures". For example, given any smooth manifold M of dimension n, the tangent bundle TM = f(p; Xp) j p 2 M; Xp 2 TpMg is \linear in tangent variables". We have seen in PSet 2 Problem 9 that TM is a smooth manifold of dimension 2n so that the canonical projection π : TM ! M is a smooth submersion. A local chart of TM is given by −1 n T' = (π; d'): π (U) ! U × R ; where f'; U; V g is a local chart of M. Note that the local chart map T' \preserves" the −1 linear structure nicely: it maps the vector space π (p) = TpM isomorphically to the vector space fpg × Rn. As a result, if you choose another chart ('; ~ U;e Ve) containing p, −1 n n then the map T 'e◦T' : fpg ×R ! fpg ×R is a linear isomorphism which depends smoothly on p. In general, we define Definition 1.1. Let E; M be smooth manifolds, and π : E ! M a surjective smooth map. We say (π; E; M) is a vector bundle of rank r if for every p 2 M, there exits an open neighborhood Uα of p and a diffeomorphism (called the local trivialization) −1 r Φα : π (Uα) ! Uα × R so that −1 r (1) Ep = π (p) is a r dimensional vector space, and ΦαjEp : Ep ! fpg × R is a linear map. (2) For Uα \ Uβ 6= ;, there is a smooth map gβα : Uα \ Uβ ! GL(r; R) so that −1 r Φβ ◦ Φα (m; v) = (m; gβα(m)(v)); 8m 2 Uα \ Uβ; v 2 R : We will call E the total space, M the base and π−1(p) the fiber over p. (In the case there is no ambiguity about the base, we will denote a vector bundle by E for short.) (Roughly speaking, a vector bundle E over M is \a smooth varying family of vector spaces parameterized by a base manifold M".) Remark. A vector bundle of rank 1 is usually called a line bundle. Remark. It is easy to define conception of a vector sub-bundle: a vector bundle (π1;E1;M) is a sub-bundle of (π; E; M) if (E1)p ⊂ Ep for any p, and π1 = πjE1 : 1 2 LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES Example. Here are some known examples: (1) For any smooth manifold M, E = M × Rr is a trivial bundle over M. (2) The tangent bundle TM and the cotangent bundle T ∗M are both vector bundles over M. (3) Given any smooth submanifold X ⊂ M, the normal bundle NX = f(p; v) j p 2 X; v 2 NpXg; (where NpX is the quotient vector space TpM=TpX) is a vector bundle over X. Note: NX is NOT a vector sub-bundle of TM. (4) Any rank r distribution V on M is a rank r vector bundle over M. It is a vector sub-bundle of the tangent bundle TM. n Example. The canonical line bundle over RP = fl is a line through 0 in Rn+1g is 1 n n+1 γn = f(l; x) j l 2 RP ; x 2 l ⊂ R g: (Can you write down a local trivialization?) 1 1 1 In particular if n = 1, we have RP ' S . In this case the canonical line bundle γ1 is nothing else but the infinite M¨obiusband, which is a line bundle over S1. 1 1 Another way to obtain the infinite M¨obiusband γ1 is to identify S with [0; 1], with end points 0 and 1 \glued together". Then the M¨obiusband is [0; 1] × R, with \boundary lines f0g × R and f1g × R glued together" via (0; t) ∼ (1; −t). Example. One can extend operations on vector spaces to operations on vector bundles. (1) Given any vector bundle (π; E; M), one can define the dual vector bundle by ∗ replacing each Ep with its dual Ep . (How to define local trivializations? What ∗ are the transition maps gβα's?) For example, T M is the dual bundle of TM. (2) Let (π1;E1;M) and (π2;E2;M) be two vector bundles over M of rank r1 and r2 respectively. Then the direct sum bundle (π1 ⊕ π2;E1 ⊕ E2;M) is the rank −1 r1 + r2 vector bundle over M with fiber (π1 ⊕ π2) (p) = (E1)p ⊕ (E2)p. (How to define local trivializations? What are the transition maps gβα's?) (3) Then the tensor product bundle (π1 ⊗ π2;E1 ⊗ E2;M) is the rank r1r2 vector −1 bundle over M with fiber (π1 ⊗ π2) (p) = (E1)p ⊗ (E2)p. (How to define local trivializations? What are the transition maps gβα's?) For example, we have the (k; l)-tensor bundle ⊗k;lTM := (TM)⊗k ⊗ (T ∗M)⊗l over M. (4) Similarly one can define the exterior power bundle ΛkT ∗M, whose fiber at point k ∗ p 2 M is the linear space Λ Tp M. (Local trivializations? Transition maps?) (5) Let f : N ! M be a smooth map, and (π; E; M) a vector bundle over M. Then one can define a pull-back bundle f ∗E over N by setting the fiber over x 2 N to be the fiber of Ef(x). (Local trivializations? Transition maps?) In particular, the restriction of a vector bundle (π; E; M) to a submanifold N of the base manifold M is a vector bundle over the submanifold N. (Note: this is not a vector sub-bundle of (π; E; M)!) LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES 3 We have seen that any smooth manifold can be embedded into the simplest mani- fold: an Euclidian space. A natural question is whether the same conclusion holds for vector bundles? More precisely, can we embed any vector bundle (π; E; M) into some trivial bundle M × RN as a vector sub-bundle? The answer is yes if M is compact, and the proof is similar to the proof of the \simple Whitney embedding theorem" in Lecture 9. (The conclusion could be wrong if M is non-compact.) Theorem 1.2. If M is compact, then any vector bundle E over M is isomorphic to a sub-bundle of a trivial vector bundle over M. Proof. (Please compare this proof with the proof of Theorem 1.1 in Lecture 9). Take a finite open cover fUig1≤i≤k of M so that E is trivial over each Ui via the trivialization 2 −1 r maps Φi = (π; Φi ): π (Ui) ! Ui × R . Let fρig1≤i≤k be a P.O.U. subordinate to fUig1≤i≤k. Consider r k 2 2 Φ: E ! M × (R ) ; v 7! (π(v); ρ1(π(v))Φ1(v); ··· ; ρk(π(v))Φk(v)): Note that on each fiber Ep, Φ is a linear isomorphism onto its image. The conclusion follows, since the image of Φ is a vector sub-bundle of M × Rrk: for any p 2 M, there 2 exists i so that ρi(p) 6= 0. Then the map Φi induces a local trivialization near p. As a corollary we get the following fundamental fact in topological K-theory: Corollary 1.3. If M is compact, then for any vector bundle E over M, there exists a vector bundle F over M so that E ⊕ F is a trivial bundle over M. Proof. We have seen that E is a vector sub-bundle of a trivial bundle M × RN over N M. Now we put an inner product on R , and take the fiber Fp of F at p 2 M to be N the orthogonal complement of Ep in R . (One should check that F is a vector bundle over M.) 2. Sections of vector bundles The following definition is natural: Definition 2.1. A (smooth) section of a vector bundle (π; E; M) is a (smooth) map s : M ! E so that π ◦ s = IdM . The set of all sections of E is denoted by Γ(E), and the set of all smooth sections of E is denoted by Γ1(E). 1 Remark. Obviously if s1; s2 are smooth sections of E, so is as1 + bs2. So Γ (E) is an (infinitely dimensional) vector space. In fact, one can say more: if s is a smooth section of E and f is a smooth function on M, then fs is a smooth section of E. So Γ1(E) is a C1(M)-module. (According to the famous Serre-Swan theorem, there is an equivalence of categories between that of finite rank vector bundles over M and finitely generated projective modules over C1(M).) Remark. Many geometrically interesting objects on M are defined as smooth sections of some (vector) bundles over M. For example, 4 LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES • A smooth vector field on M = a smooth section of TM. • A smooth (k; l)-tensor field on M = a smooth section of ⊗k;lTM. • A smooth k-form on M = a smooth section of ΛkT ∗M. • A volume form on M = a non-vanishing smooth section of ΛnT ∗M. • A Riemannian metric on M = a smooth section of ⊗2T ∗M satisfying some extra (symmetric, positive definite) conditions • A symplectic form on M = a smooth section of Λ2T ∗M satisfying some extra (closed, non-degenerate) conditions By definition any vector bundle admits a trivial smooth section: the zero section s0 : M ! E; p 7! (p; 0): On the other hand, it is possible that a vector bundle admits no non-vanishing section.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NOTES on FIBER DIMENSION Let Φ : X → Y Be a Morphism of Affine
    NOTES ON FIBER DIMENSION SAM EVENS Let φ : X → Y be a morphism of affine algebraic sets, defined over an algebraically closed field k. For y ∈ Y , the set φ−1(y) is called the fiber over y. In these notes, I explain some basic results about the dimension of the fiber over y. These notes are largely taken from Chapters 3 and 4 of Humphreys, “Linear Algebraic Groups”, chapter 6 of Bump, “Algebraic Geometry”, and Tauvel and Yu, “Lie algebras and algebraic groups”. The book by Bump has an incomplete proof of the main fact we are proving (which repeats an incomplete proof from Mumford’s notes “The Red Book on varieties and Schemes”). Tauvel and Yu use a step I was not able to verify. The important thing is that you understand the statements and are able to use the Theorems 0.22 and 0.24. Let A be a ring. If p0 ⊂ p1 ⊂···⊂ pk is a chain of distinct prime ideals of A, we say the chain has length k and ends at p. Definition 0.1. Let p be a prime ideal of A. We say ht(p) = k if there is a chain of distinct prime ideals p0 ⊂···⊂ pk = p in A of length k, and there is no chain of prime ideals in A of length k +1 ending at p. If B is a finitely generated integral k-algebra, we set dim(B) = dim(F ), where F is the fraction field of B. Theorem 0.2. (Serre, “Local Algebra”, Proposition 15, p. 45) Let A be a finitely gener- ated integral k-algebra and let p ⊂ A be a prime ideal.
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing Cohomology Classes As Euler Classes 1
    Ó DOI: 10.2478/s12175-012-0057-2 Math. Slovaca 62 (2012), No. 5, 949–966 REALIZING COHOMOLOGY CLASSES AS EULER CLASSES Aniruddha C Naolekar (Communicated by J´ulius Korbaˇs ) s ◦ ABSTRACT. For a space X,letEk(X), Ek(X)andEk (X) denote respectively the set of Euler classes of oriented k-plane bundles over X, the set of Euler classes of stably trivial k-plane bundles over X and the spherical classes in Hk(X; Z). s ◦ We prove some general facts about the sets Ek(X), Ek(X)andEk (X). We also compute these sets in the cases where X is a projective space, the Dold manifold P (m, 1) and obtain partial computations in the case that X is a product of spheres. c 2012 Mathematical Institute Slovak Academy of Sciences 1. Introduction Given a topological space X, we address the question of which classes x ∈ Hk(X; Z) can be realized as the Euler class e(ξ)ofanorientedk-plane bundle ξ over X. We also look at the question of which integral cohomology classes are spherical. It is convenient to make the following definition. s º ≥ ÒØÓÒ 1.1 For a space X and an integer k 1, the sets Ek(X), Ek(X) ◦ and Ek (X) are defined to be k Ek(X)= e(ξ) ∈ H (X; Z) | ξ is an oriented k-plane bundle over X s k Ek(X)= e(ξ) ∈ H (X; Z) | ξ is a stably trivial k-plane bundle over X ◦ k k ∗ Ek (X)= x ∈ H (X; Z) | there exists f : S −→ X with f (x) =0 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Jouanolou-Thomason Homotopy Lemma
    The Jouanolou-Thomason homotopy lemma Aravind Asok February 9, 2009 1 Introduction The goal of this note is to prove what is now known as the Jouanolou-Thomason homotopy lemma or simply \Jouanolou's trick." Our main reason for discussing this here is that i) most statements (that I have seen) assume unncessary quasi-projectivity hypotheses, and ii) most applications of the result that I know (e.g., in homotopy K-theory) appeal to the result as merely a \black box," while the proof indicates that the construction is quite geometric and relatively explicit. For simplicity, throughout the word scheme means separated Noetherian scheme. Theorem 1.1 (Jouanolou-Thomason homotopy lemma). Given a smooth scheme X over a regular Noetherian base ring k, there exists a pair (X;~ π), where X~ is an affine scheme, smooth over k, and π : X~ ! X is a Zariski locally trivial smooth morphism with fibers isomorphic to affine spaces. 1 Remark 1.2. In terms of an A -homotopy category of smooth schemes over k (e.g., H(k) or H´et(k); see [MV99, x3]), the map π is an A1-weak equivalence (use [MV99, x3 Example 2.4]. Thus, up to A1-weak equivalence, any smooth k-scheme is an affine scheme smooth over k. 2 An explicit algebraic form Let An denote affine space over Spec Z. Let An n 0 denote the scheme quasi-affine and smooth over 2m Spec Z obtained by removing the fiber over 0. Let Q2m−1 denote the closed subscheme of A (with coordinates x1; : : : ; x2m) defined by the equation X xixm+i = 1: i Consider the following simple situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Connections on Bundles Md
    Dhaka Univ. J. Sci. 60(2): 191-195, 2012 (July) Connections on Bundles Md. Showkat Ali, Md. Mirazul Islam, Farzana Nasrin, Md. Abu Hanif Sarkar and Tanzia Zerin Khan Department of Mathematics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh, Email: [email protected] Received on 25. 05. 2011.Accepted for Publication on 15. 12. 2011 Abstract This paper is a survey of the basic theory of connection on bundles. A connection on tangent bundle , is called an affine connection on an -dimensional smooth manifold . By the general discussion of affine connection on vector bundles that necessarily exists on which is compatible with tensors. I. Introduction = < , > (2) In order to differentiate sections of a vector bundle [5] or where <, > represents the pairing between and ∗. vector fields on a manifold we need to introduce a Then is a section of , called the absolute differential structure called the connection on a vector bundle. For quotient or the covariant derivative of the section along . example, an affine connection is a structure attached to a differentiable manifold so that we can differentiate its Theorem 1. A connection always exists on a vector bundle. tensor fields. We first introduce the general theorem of Proof. Choose a coordinate covering { }∈ of . Since connections on vector bundles. Then we study the tangent vector bundles are trivial locally, we may assume that there is bundle. is a -dimensional vector bundle determine local frame field for any . By the local structure of intrinsically by the differentiable structure [8] of an - connections, we need only construct a × matrix on dimensional smooth manifold . each such that the matrices satisfy II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extension Problem in Complex Analysis II; Embeddings with Positive Normal Bundle Author(S): Phillip A
    The Extension Problem in Complex Analysis II; Embeddings with Positive Normal Bundle Author(s): Phillip A. Griffiths Source: American Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 88, No. 2 (Apr., 1966), pp. 366-446 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2373200 Accessed: 25/10/2010 12:00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jhup. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Journal of Mathematics. http://www.jstor.org THE EXTENSION PROBLEM IN COMPLEX ANALYSIS II; EMBEDDINGS WITH POSITIVE NORMAL BUNDLE.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Bundles on Projective Space
    Vector Bundles on Projective Space Takumi Murayama December 1, 2013 1 Preliminaries on vector bundles Let X be a (quasi-projective) variety over k. We follow [Sha13, Chap. 6, x1.2]. Definition. A family of vector spaces over X is a morphism of varieties π : E ! X −1 such that for each x 2 X, the fiber Ex := π (x) is isomorphic to a vector space r 0 0 Ak(x).A morphism of a family of vector spaces π : E ! X and π : E ! X is a morphism f : E ! E0 such that the following diagram commutes: f E E0 π π0 X 0 and the map fx : Ex ! Ex is linear over k(x). f is an isomorphism if fx is an isomorphism for all x. A vector bundle is a family of vector spaces that is locally trivial, i.e., for each x 2 X, there exists a neighborhood U 3 x such that there is an isomorphism ': π−1(U) !∼ U × Ar that is an isomorphism of families of vector spaces by the following diagram: −1 ∼ r π (U) ' U × A (1.1) π pr1 U −1 where pr1 denotes the first projection. We call π (U) ! U the restriction of the vector bundle π : E ! X onto U, denoted by EjU . r is locally constant, hence is constant on every irreducible component of X. If it is constant everywhere on X, we call r the rank of the vector bundle. 1 The following lemma tells us how local trivializations of a vector bundle glue together on the entire space X.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem Liviu I. Nicolaescu
    Notes on the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem Liviu I. Nicolaescu Notes for a topics in topology course, University of Notre Dame, Spring 2004, Spring 2013. Last revision: November 15, 2013 i The Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem This is arguably one of the deepest and most beautiful results in modern geometry, and in my view is a must know for any geometer/topologist. It has to do with elliptic partial differential opera- tors on a compact manifold, namely those operators P with the property that dim ker P; dim coker P < 1. In general these integers are very difficult to compute without some very precise information about P . Remarkably, their difference, called the index of P , is a “soft” quantity in the sense that its determination can be carried out relying only on topological tools. You should compare this with the following elementary situation. m n Suppose we are given a linear operator A : C ! C . From this information alone we cannot compute the dimension of its kernel or of its cokernel. We can however compute their difference which, according to the rank-nullity theorem for n×m matrices must be dim ker A−dim coker A = m − n. Michael Atiyah and Isadore Singer have shown in the 1960s that the index of an elliptic operator is determined by certain cohomology classes on the background manifold. These cohomology classes are in turn topological invariants of the vector bundles on which the differential operator acts and the homotopy class of the principal symbol of the operator. Moreover, they proved that in order to understand the index problem for an arbitrary elliptic operator it suffices to understand the index problem for a very special class of first order elliptic operators, namely the Dirac type elliptic operators.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.10 Partitions of Unity and Whitney Embedding 1300Y Geometry and Topology
    1.10 Partitions of unity and Whitney embedding 1300Y Geometry and Topology Theorem 1.49 (noncompact Whitney embedding in R2n+1). Any smooth n-manifold may be embedded in R2n+1 (or immersed in R2n). Proof. We saw that any manifold may be written as a countable union of increasing compact sets M = [Ki, and that a regular covering f(Ui;k ⊃ Vi;k;'i;k)g of M can be chosen so that for fixed i, fVi;kgk is a finite ◦ ◦ cover of Ki+1nKi and each Ui;k is contained in Ki+2nKi−1. This means that we can express M as the union of 3 open sets W0;W1;W2, where [ Wj = ([kUi;k): i≡j(mod3) 2n+1 Each of the sets Ri = [kUi;k may be injectively immersed in R by the argument for compact manifolds, 2n+1 since they have a finite regular cover. Call these injective immersions Φi : Ri −! R . The image Φi(Ri) is bounded since all the charts are, by some radius ri. The open sets Ri; i ≡ j(mod3) for fixed j are disjoint, and by translating each Φi; i ≡ j(mod3) by an appropriate constant, we can ensure that their images in R2n+1 are disjoint as well. 0 −! 0 2n+1 Let Φi = Φi + (2(ri−1 + ri−2 + ··· ) + ri) e 1. Then Ψj = [i≡j(mod3)Φi : Wj −! R is an embedding. 2n+1 Now that we have injective immersions Ψ0; Ψ1; Ψ2 of W0;W1;W2 in R , we may use the original argument for compact manifolds: Take the partition of unity subordinate to Ui;k and resum it, obtaining a P P 3-element partition of unity ff1; f2; f3g, with fj = i≡j(mod3) k fi;k.
    [Show full text]
  • Vanishing Cycles, Plane Curve Singularities, and Framed Mapping Class Groups
    VANISHING CYCLES, PLANE CURVE SINGULARITIES, AND FRAMED MAPPING CLASS GROUPS PABLO PORTILLA CUADRADO AND NICK SALTER Abstract. Let f be an isolated plane curve singularity with Milnor fiber of genus at least 5. For all such f, we give (a) an intrinsic description of the geometric monodromy group that does not invoke the notion of the versal deformation space, and (b) an easy criterion to decide if a given simple closed curve in the Milnor fiber is a vanishing cycle or not. With the lone exception of singularities of type An and Dn, we find that both are determined completely by a canonical framing of the Milnor fiber induced by the Hamiltonian vector field associated to f. As a corollary we answer a question of Sullivan concerning the injectivity of monodromy groups for all singularities having Milnor fiber of genus at least 7. 1. Introduction Let f : C2 ! C denote an isolated plane curve singularity and Σ(f) the Milnor fiber over some point. A basic principle in singularity theory is to study f by way of its versal deformation space ∼ µ Vf = C , the parameter space of all deformations of f up to topological equivalence (see Section 2.2). From this point of view, two of the most basic invariants of f are the set of vanishing cycles and the geometric monodromy group. A simple closed curve c ⊂ Σ(f) is a vanishing cycle if there is some deformation fe of f with fe−1(0) a nodal curve such that c is contracted to a point when transported to −1 fe (0).
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES in This Section We Will Introduce The
    LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES In this section we will introduce the interesting class of fibrations given by fiber bundles. Fiber bundles play an important role in many geometric contexts. For example, the Grassmaniann varieties and certain fiber bundles associated to Stiefel varieties are central in the classification of vector bundles over (nice) spaces. The fact that fiber bundles are examples of Serre fibrations follows from Theorem ?? which states that being a Serre fibration is a local property. 1. Fiber bundles and principal bundles Definition 6.1. A fiber bundle with fiber F is a map p: E ! X with the following property: every ∼ −1 point x 2 X has a neighborhood U ⊆ X for which there is a homeomorphism φU : U × F = p (U) such that the following diagram commutes in which π1 : U × F ! U is the projection on the first factor: φ U × F U / p−1(U) ∼= π1 p * U t Remark 6.2. The projection X × F ! X is an example of a fiber bundle: it is called the trivial bundle over X with fiber F . By definition, a fiber bundle is a map which is `locally' homeomorphic to a trivial bundle. The homeomorphism φU in the definition is a local trivialization of the bundle, or a trivialization over U. Let us begin with an interesting subclass. A fiber bundle whose fiber F is a discrete space is (by definition) a covering projection (with fiber F ). For example, the exponential map R ! S1 is a covering projection with fiber Z. Suppose X is a space which is path-connected and locally simply connected (in fact, the weaker condition of being semi-locally simply connected would be enough for the following construction).
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Subspaces of Hypersurfaces
    LINEAR SUBSPACES OF HYPERSURFACES ROYA BEHESHTI AND ERIC RIEDL Abstract. Let X be an arbitrary smooth hypersurface in CPn of degree d. We prove the de Jong-Debarre Conjecture for n ≥ 2d−4: the space of lines in X has dimension 2n−d−3. d+k−1 We also prove an analogous result for k-planes: if n ≥ 2 k + k, then the space of k- planes on X will be irreducible of the expected dimension. As applications, we prove that an arbitrary smooth hypersurface satisfying n ≥ 2d! is unirational, and we prove that the space of degree e curves on X will be irreducible of the expected dimension provided that e+n d ≤ e+1 . 1. Introduction We work throughout over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0. Let X ⊂ Pn be an arbitrary smooth hypersurface of degree d. Let Fk(X) ⊂ G(k; n) be the Hilbert scheme of k-planes contained in X. Question 1.1. What is the dimension of Fk(X)? In particular, we would like to know if there are triples (n; d; k) for which the answer depends only on (n; d; k) and not on the specific smooth hypersurface X. It is known d+k classically that Fk(X) is locally cut out by k equations. Therefore, one might expect the d+k answer to Question 1.1 to be that the dimension is (k + 1)(n − k) − k , where negative dimensions mean that Fk(X) is empty. This is indeed the case when the hypersurface X is general [10, 17]. Standard examples (see Proposition 3.1) show that dim Fk(X) must depend on the particular smooth hypersurface X for d large relative to n and k, but there remains hope that Question 1.1 might be answered positively for n large relative to d and k.
    [Show full text]
  • K-Theoryand Characteristic Classes
    MATH 6530: K-THEORY AND CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES Taught by Inna Zakharevich Notes by David Mehrle [email protected] Cornell University Fall 2017 Last updated November 8, 2018. The latest version is online here. Contents 1 Vector bundles................................ 3 1.1 Grassmannians ............................ 8 1.2 Classification of Vector bundles.................... 11 2 Cohomology and Characteristic Classes................. 15 2.1 Cohomology of Grassmannians................... 18 2.2 Characteristic Classes......................... 22 2.3 Axioms for Stiefel-Whitney classes................. 26 2.4 Some computations.......................... 29 3 Cobordism.................................. 35 3.1 Stiefel-Whitney Numbers ...................... 35 3.2 Cobordism Groups.......................... 37 3.3 Geometry of Thom Spaces...................... 38 3.4 L-equivalence and Transversality.................. 42 3.5 Characteristic Numbers and Boundaries.............. 47 4 K-Theory................................... 49 4.1 Bott Periodicity ............................ 49 4.2 The K-theory spectrum........................ 56 4.3 Some properties of K-theory..................... 58 4.4 An example: K-theory of S2 ..................... 59 4.5 Power Operations............................ 61 4.6 When is the Hopf Invariant one?.................. 64 4.7 The Splitting Principle........................ 66 5 Where do we go from here?........................ 68 5.1 The J-homomorphism ........................ 70 5.2 The Chern Character and e invariant...............
    [Show full text]