DOCSLIB.ORG

The Limitations of Ghana's Rural Health Care Access: Case Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Limitations of Ghana's Rural Health Care Access: Case Study The Limitations Of Ghana’s Rural Health Care Access: Case Study: GA East, Greater Accra Maria Polychronis International Policy Network Occasional Paper 4 1 GLOBAL FUTURES Global Futures, a flagship project of the Rutgers University MA Program in Political Science - United Na- tions and Global Policy Studies, is an international association of global policy analysts. By creating a forum for global policy experts, including scholars, practitioners, decision-makers and activists from diverse back- grounds and cultures, Global Futures promotes a constructive international dialogue centered on the chal- lenges we all face as global citizens. Through its publications, conferences and workshops, Global Futures seeks to generate a more comprehensive understanding of contemporary global affairs and, consequently, develop innovative solutions for a more stable, tolerant, and sustainable global society. Benefits of member- ship in Global Futures: • An opportunity for academics, policy-makers, civil society organizations, and business communi- ties to become acquainted with a diverse spectrum of theoretical perspectives, analytical approaches, methodologies and policy prescriptions on global policy issues. • Access to the Global Futures website which contains information on research projects, both ongoing and in formation, funding opportunities for research and training, a discussion board through which to contact colleagues with similar global policy interests, and new publications of interest to the global policy analyst community. • Access to the Global Futures Occasional Paper series which presents research on key global policy problems conducted by scholars from universities around the world. Members of Global Futures include: MA Program in Political Science – United Nations and Global Policy Studies; the Rutgers University Division of Global Affairs; the UNESCO Chair in Islamic Inter-Faith Dialogue Studies, the University of Kufa; the Institute of Iraqi Studies, Boston University; the International Center for Development and Decent Work, University of Kassel; the Center for Shia Studies, Washington, DC; the School of International and Public Affairs, Jilin University; the Center for Good Governance Studies, the University of Novy Sad. For information on Global Futures, please contact us at: [email protected] Maria Polychronis is a recent graduate of Rutgers University with a Master’s degree in United Nations and Global Policy Studies. As an international development professional, Maria has managed health, governance and human rights programs in the United States, United Kingdom and West Africa. Prior to development, she worked as a policy researcher in the House of Commons in London, and as a program coordinator in New York for the World Federation of the United Nations Association and the Permanent Mission of Iraq to the United Nations. Maria is currently living in New York City and preparing for her next project in East Africa. This research was commissioned by the Ghana Health Services, executed by two non-governmental organizations: SEND Ghana and Alliance for African Women Initiative and conducted prior to the author’s enrolled in MA Program United Nations and Global Policy Studies. Therefore, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey is not responsible for data collection and content of the paper. unstudies.rutgers.edu 2 3 The Limitations Of Ghana’s Rural Health Care Access: Case Study: GA East, Greater Accra Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 II. Ghana Health Services And The NHIS .............................................................................................................. 7 III. Rural Access To Health Care And The Poor ....................................................................................................... 9 IV. Cultural And Political Considerations For The Distribution Disparity ..........................................................11 V. Implications Of Poor Rural Access To Health Care - Child And Maternal Health Crisis ................................................................................................................... 13 VI. The Practical Solution With Limitations – Community Based Health Care ................................................. 14 VII. Case Study: Ga East, Greater Accra .................................................................................................................. 16 A. Objective ..................................................................................................................................................... 16 I. Abokobi Hospital ................................................................................................................................. 16 1. Statement Of The Problem ........................................................................................................... 16 2. Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 16 3. Findings .......................................................................................................................................... 16 4. Limitations ..................................................................................................................................... 19 II. CHPS Compound ................................................................................................................................ 19 III. National Polio Imunization Campaign .............................................................................................. 20 B. Discussion And Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 20 VIII. Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 22 A. Community Involvement ........................................................................................................................... 22 B. Logistical Improvements ............................................................................................................................ 22 C. Training Of Hospital Staff And Human Resources For Health ................................................................ 23 IX. Suggestions For Further Research ..................................................................................................................... 24 X. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................ 25 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................................................. 26 Notes ......................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Annex 1: Ghana Demographic Information .......................................................................................................... 27 Annex 2: Health Facilities Access Survey ................................................................................................................. 28 Annex 3: Community Monitoring Forms ............................................................................................................... 30 2 3 The Limitations Of Ghana’s Rural Health Care Access: Case Study: GA East, Greater Accra LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AFAWI – Alliance for African Women Initiative ANC – Antenatal Care CHO – Community Health Officer CHPS – Community Health Participation Scheme GDHS – Ghana Demographic and Health Survey GHS – Ghana Health Services MDGs – Millennium Development Goals MMR – Maternal Mortality Ratio NGO – Non Governmental Organization NHIS – National Health Insurance Scheme OOP – Out of Pocket Payments PNC – Postnatal Care SSNIT – Social Security and National Insurance Trust UN – United Nations UNICEF – United Nations Children’s Fund WHO – World Health Organization 4 5 The Limitations Of Ghana’s Rural Health Care Access: Case Study: GA East, Greater Accra I. Introduction Health care in Ghana has improved significantly throughout the years, especially since the introduction of the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) in 2003. However, the issue has since become a matter of equity, leading many to question if the scheme is a pro-poor solution as was originally envisaged. There is no doubt that universal health coverage can increase access to health services, but in the case of Ghana, a foremost concern is that the NHIS is regressive, meaning that on average the richer segments of the population are paying less as a proportion of their income for health care than the poorer segments. This paper seeks to highlight the inequalities in the distribution of health care benefits particular as poor rural access has perpetuated sub-standard maternal delivery services, which have caused an increase in maternal mortality rates. Implementing the NHIS is remarkable accomplishment for the government of Ghana, not only within a sub-Saharan context but globally as well, particularly given that some of the most developed nations, such as the Untied States, have yet to implement universal health coverage for their
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Home Office, United Kingdom
    GHANA COUNTRY ASSESSMENT APRIL 2002 COUNTRY INFORMATION & POLICY UNIT IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM CONTENTS I. Scope of Document 1.1 - 1.5 II. Geography 2.1 - 2.2 Economy 2.3 III. History 3.1 - 3.2 IV. State Structures The Constitution 4.1 - 4.3 Political System 4.4 - 4.8 Judiciary 4.9 - 4.15 Military 4.16 (i) National Service 4.17 Internal Security 4.18 - 4.22 Legal Rights/Detention 4.23 - 4.24 Prisons and Prison conditions 4.25 - 4.30 Medical Services 4.31 - 4.38 Educational System 4.39 - 4.41 V. Human Rights V.A Human Rights Issues Overview 5.1 - 5.4 Freedom of Speech and the Media 5.5 - 5.11 Freedom of Religion 5.12 - 5.19 Freedom of Assembly & Association 5.20 - 5.25 Employment Rights 5.26 - 5.28 People Trafficking 5.29 - 5.34 Freedom of Movement 5.35 - 5.36 V.B Human Rights - Specific Groups Women 5.37 - 5.43 (i) Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) 5.44 - 5.45 (ii) The Trokosi system 5.46 - 5.48 Children 5.49 - 5.55 Ethnic Groups 5.56 - 5.60 Homosexuals 5.61 V.C Human Rights - Other Issues Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) 5.62 Annexes: Chronology of Events Political Organisations Prominent People References to Source Material I. Scope of Document 1.1. This assessment has been produced by the Country Information & Policy Unit, Immigration & Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2. The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process.
    [Show full text]
  • An Epidemiological Profile of Malaria and Its Control in Ghana
    An Epidemiological Profile of Malaria and its Control in Ghana Report prepared by National Malaria Control Programme, Accra, Ghana & University of Health & Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana & AngloGold Ashanti Malaria Control Program, Obuasi, Ghana & World Health Organization, Country Programme, Accra, Ghana & The INFORM Project Department of Public Health Research Kenya Medical Research Institute - Wellcome Trust Progamme Nairobi, Kenya Version 1.0 November 2013 Acknowledgments The authors are indebted to the following individuals from the MPHD, KEMRI-Oxford programme: Ngiang-Bakwin Kandala, Caroline Kabaria, Viola Otieno, Damaris Kinyoki, Jonesmus Mutua and Stella Kasura; we are also grateful to the help provided by Philomena Efua Nyarko, Abena Asamoabea, Osei-Akoto and Anthony Amuzu of the Ghana Statistical Service for help providing parasitological data on the MICS4 survey; Catherine Linard for assistance on modelling human population settlement; and Muriel Bastien, Marie Sarah Villemin Partow, Reynald Erard and Christian Pethas-Magilad of the WHO archives in Geneva. We acknowledge in particular all those who have generously provided unpublished data, helped locate information or the geo-coordinates of data necessary to complete the analysis of malaria risk across Ghana: Collins Ahorlu, Benjamin Abuaku, Felicia Amo-Sakyi, Frank Amoyaw, Irene Ayi, Fred Binka, David van Bodegom, Michael Cappello, Daniel Chandramohan, Amanua Chinbua, Benjamin Crookston, Ina Danquah, Stephan Ehrhardt, Johnny Gyapong, Maragret Gyapong, Franca Hartgers, Debbie Humphries, Juergen May, Seth Owusu-Agyei, Kwadwo Koram, Margaret Kweku, Frank Mockenhaupt, Philip Ricks, Sylvester Segbaya, Harry Tagbor and Mitchell Weiss. The authors also acknowledge the support and encouragement provided by the RBM Partnership, Shamwill Issah and Alistair Robb of the UK government's Department for International Development (DFID), Claude Emile Rwagacondo of the West African RBM sub- regional network and Thomas Teuscher of RBM, Geneva.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Accountability in Ghana's National
    RESEARCH BRIEFING JUNE 2016 WHEN DOES THE STATE LISTEN? 1 16 How does governmentIDS_Master Logo responsiveness come about? The politics of accountability in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme TERENCE DARKO RESEARCH How does government responsiveness come about? BRIEFING The politics of accountability in Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme Author Terence Darko is a Researcher at Capacity Development Consult (CDC), a Ghanaian-based research and consulting firm. He has an MA in Social Policy Studies from the University of Ghana. Before joining CDC, he worked with Innovations for Poverty Action Ghana and the Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research, Ghana. His research interests include policy processes, the politics of social development, social protection, citizen participation and political accountability. Email: [email protected] Production credits Production editor: Catherine Setchell, Making All Voices Count, [email protected] Copyeditor: Karen Brock, Green Ink, [email protected] Designer: Lance Bellers, [email protected] Further reading This research briefing forms part of a wider research project called When Does the State Listen? led by the Institute of Development Studies and funded by the Making All Voices Count initiative. The other briefs from this research project are: Cassim, A. (2016) What happens to policy when policy champions move on? The case of welfare 2 in South Africa, Brighton: IDS 16 Katera, L. (2016) Why is it so hard for non-state actors to be heard? Inside Tanzania’s education policies, Brighton: IDS Loureiro, M; Cassim, A; Darko, T; Katera, L; and Salome, N. (2016) ‘When Does the State Listen?’ IDS Bulletin Vol 47 No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Comparison of Ghana, Kenya, and Senegal
    1 Democratization and Universal Health Coverage: A Case Comparison of Ghana, Kenya, and Senegal Karen A. Grépin and Kim Yi Dionne This article identifies conditions under which newly established democracies adopt Universal Health Coverage. Drawing on the literature examining democracy and health, we argue that more democratic regimes – where citizens have positive opinions on democracy and where competitive, free and fair elections put pressure on incumbents – will choose health policies targeting a broader proportion of the population. We compare Ghana to Kenya and Senegal, two other countries which have also undergone democratization, but where there have been important differences in the extent to which these democratic changes have been perceived by regular citizens and have translated into electoral competition. We find that Ghana has adopted the most ambitious health reform strategy by designing and implementing the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). We also find that Ghana experienced greater improvements in skilled attendance at birth, childhood immunizations, and improvements in the proportion of children with diarrhea treated by oral rehydration therapy than the other countries since this policy was adopted. These changes also appear to be associated with important changes in health outcomes: both infant and under-five mortality rates declined rapidly since the introduction of the NHIS in Ghana. These improvements in health and health service delivery have also been observed by citizens with a greater proportion of Ghanaians reporting satisfaction with government handling of health service delivery relative to either Kenya or Senegal. We argue that the democratization process can promote the adoption of particular health policies and that this is an important mechanism through which democracy can improve health.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghana Marine Canoe Frame Survey 2016
    INFORMATION REPORT NO 36 Republic of Ghana Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development FISHERIES COMMISSION Fisheries Scientific Survey Division REPORT ON THE 2016 GHANA MARINE CANOE FRAME SURVEY BY Dovlo E, Amador K, Nkrumah B et al August 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... 2 LIST of Table and Figures .................................................................................................................... 3 Tables............................................................................................................................................... 3 Figures ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 BACKGROUND 1.2 AIM OF SURVEY ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 PROFILES OF MMDAs IN THE REGIONS ......................................................................................... 5 2.1 VOLTA REGION .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 GREATER ACCRA REGION .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Conents
    i TABLE OF CONENTS ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................ VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 PERFORMANCE OF KEY INDICATORS ........................................................................ 3 2.1. INDICATORS ON CWSA REFORM PROGRAM ........................................................... 3 2.1.1 Performance of Financial and Economic Indicators ........................................................ 3 2.1.2 Performance of Efficiency and Productivity Indicators................................................... 4 2.1.2.1 Water Supply Systems .................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2.2 Sanitation Indicators ...................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2.3 Community Capacity Building Indicators ..................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Performance of Dynamic/Management Improvement Indicators .................................. 7 2.1.4 Technical and Operational Indicators ............................................................................... 8 3.0 HUMAN RESOURCES AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ...................................... 9 3.1 MANAGEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Interest Groups, Issue Definition and the Politics of Healthcare in Ghana
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Public Policy and Administration Research www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5731(Paper) ISSN 2225-0972(Online) Vol.4, No.6, 2014 Interest Groups, Issue Definition and the Politics of Healthcare in Ghana Edward Brenya 1* Samuel Adu-Gyamfi 2 1. History and Political Studies, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB, Kumasi Ashanti, Ghana 2. History and Political Studies, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB, Kumasi Ashanti, Ghana *Email of corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The provision of healthcare in Ghana from the pre-colonial period to the 4 th Republic has been characterized by struggles to maintain dominance. While the politics in the pre-independence period focused on the manner of providing healthcare, the post-independence period encapsulates healthcare financing. Using the interest groups theory, the study examines the manner and motive of healthcare management in Ghana. The study finds that a coalition of healthcare interest groups often comprising healthcare providers, government functionaries, bureaucrats, and the World Bank and IMF etc., (from the 1970s), uses the definition of healthcare management to maintain leverage in the management of healthcare. Healthcare management in the pre-colonial period was defined as interventionism while the colonial administration focused on scientific therapy. The post-colonial period witnessed a shift of focus to healthcare financing and Nkrumah’ government adopted free healthcare system financed by the state. The Busia’s government focused on sustainability based on payment of small user fee.
    [Show full text]
  • Misconceptions, Misinformation and Politics of COVID-19 on Social Media: a Multi-Level Analysis in Ghana
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 05 May 2021 doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.613794 Misconceptions, Misinformation and Politics of COVID-19 on Social Media: A Multi-Level Analysis in Ghana Philip Teg-Nefaah Tabong 1* and Martin Segtub 2 1 Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana Legon, Accra, Ghana, 2 Department of Communication Studies, University of Professional Studies, Accra, Ghana Background: Ghana developed an Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan (EPRP) in response to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS CoV-2) pandemic. A key strategy in the EPRP is to mobilize national resources and put in place strategies for improved risk and behavioral change communication. Nonetheless, concerns have been raised on social media about COVID-19 misinformation and misconceptions. This study used social media content to determine the types, forms and the effects of the myths, misconceptions and misinformation in Ghana’s COVID-19 containment. Method: The study was conducted in three phases involving the use of both primary and secondary data. Review of social media information on COVID-19 was done. This was complemented with document review and interviews with key stakeholders with expertise in the management of public health emergencies and mass communication Edited by: experts (N = 18). All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using NVivo 12. Fredrick Ogenga, Rongo University, Kenya Results: The study showed a changing pattern in the misconceptions and Reviewed by: misinformation about COVID-19. Initially myths were largely on causes and vulnerability. Rasha El-Ibiary, It was widely speculated that black people had some immunity against COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Small and Medium Forest Enterprises in Ghana
    Small and Medium Forest Enterprises in Ghana Small and medium forest enterprises (SMFEs) serve as the main or additional source of income for more than three million Ghanaians and can be broadly categorised into wood forest products, non-wood forest products and forest services. Many of these SMFEs are informal, untaxed and largely invisible within state forest planning and management. Pressure on the forest resource within Ghana is growing, due to both domestic and international demand for forest products and services. The need to improve the sustainability and livelihood contribution of SMFEs has become a policy priority, both in the search for a legal timber export trade within the Voluntary Small and Medium Partnership Agreement (VPA) linked to the European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (EU FLEGT) Action Plan, and in the quest to develop a national Forest Enterprises strategy for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD). This sourcebook aims to shed new light on the multiple SMFE sub-sectors that in Ghana operate within Ghana and the challenges they face. Chapter one presents some characteristics of SMFEs in Ghana. Chapter two presents information on what goes into establishing a small business and the obligations for small businesses and Ghana Government’s initiatives on small enterprises. Chapter three presents profiles of the key SMFE subsectors in Ghana including: akpeteshie (local gin), bamboo and rattan household goods, black pepper, bushmeat, chainsaw lumber, charcoal, chewsticks, cola, community-based ecotourism, essential oils, ginger, honey, medicinal products, mortar and pestles, mushrooms, shea butter, snails, tertiary wood processing and wood carving.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Cover
    WORKING PAPER UNICEF GOOD PRACTICES IN INTEGRATING BIRTH REGISTRATION INTO HEALTH SYSTEMS (2000-2009) CASE STUDIES: BANGLADESH, BRAZIL, THE GAMBIA AND DELHI, INDIA JANUARY 2010 Fall08 WORKING PAPER UNICEF GOOD PRACTICES IN INTEGRATING BIRTH REGISTRATION INTO HEALTH SYSTEMS (2000–2009) CASE STUDIES: BANGLADESH, BRAZIL, THE GAMBIA AND DELHI, INDIA Mariana Muzzi JANUARY 2010 UNICEF Good Practices in Integrating Birth Registration into Health Systems (2000–2009); Case Studies: Bangladesh, Brazil, the Gambia and Delhi, India © United Nations Children‟s Fund (UNICEF), New York, 2009 UNICEF 3 UN Plaza, NY, NY 10017 December, 2009 This is a working document. It has been prepared to facilitate the exchange of knowledge and to stimulate discussion. The text has not been edited to official publication standards and UNICEF accepts no responsibility for errors. The designations in this publication do not imply an opinion on legal status of any country or territory, or of its authorities, or the delimitation of frontiers. About the author Mariana Muzzi is a Brazilian-Finnish political scientist who has worked on child protection and human rights issues since 2001 with the International Organization for Migration, the European Union, UNICEF, non-govermental organizations and research institutes in several countries, including Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, India, Peru, and the United States. She has been published in English and Spanish in the fields of birth registration, counter-trafficking in human beings, domestic violence prevention, sexual exploitation of children, juvenile justice, children’s rights and public health. Recent research initiatives include Children in Administrative Detention in India (2009), Child Protection and Islam (2008), and State Obligations vis-à- vis the Right to Health: Child Abuse and the Health-System based Child Abuse Attention Modules in Peru (2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from a Field Experiment in Ghana 
    Long-run Consequences of Health Insurance Promotion When Mandates are Not Enforceable: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Ghana Patrick Opoku Asuming, Hyuncheol Bryant Kim, and Armand Sim May 2019 Abstract We study long-run selection and treatment effects of a health insurance subsidy in Ghana, where mandates are not enforceable. We randomly provide different levels of subsidy (1/3, 2/3, and full), with follow-up surveys seven months and three years after the initial intervention. We find that a one-time subsidy promotes and sustains insurance enrollment for all treatment groups, but long-run health care service utilization increases only for the partial subsidy groups. We find evidence that selection explains this pattern: those who were enrolled due to the subsidy, especially the partial subsidy, are more ill and have greater health care utilization. Key words: health insurance; sustainability; selection; randomized experiments JEL code: I1, O12 Contact the corresponding author, Hyuncheol Bryant Kim, at [email protected]; Asuming: University of Ghana Business School; Kim: Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University; Sim: Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University. We thank Ama Baafra Abeberese, Douglas Almond, Diane Alexander, Jim Berry, John Cawley, Esteban Mendez Chacon, Pierre-Andre Chiappori, Giacomo De Giorgi, Supreet Kaur, Robert Kaestner, Don Kenkel, Daeho Kim, Michael Kremer, Wojciech Kopczuk, Leigh Linden, Corrine Low, Doug Miller, Sangyoon Park, Seollee Park, Cristian Pop-Eleches, Bernard Salanie, and seminar participants at Columbia University, Cornell University, Seoul National University, and the NEUDC. This research was supported by the Cornell Population Center and Social Enterprise Development Foundation, Ghana (SEND-Ghana)." Armand Sim gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Indonesia Education Endowment Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Ga East Municipal
    TABLE OF CONTENT REPUBLIC OF GHANA PART A: STRATEGIC OVERVIEW ................................................................................ 4 1.0 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT ............................................................. 4 2.VISION ...................................................................................................................... 5 3.MISSION ................................................................................................................... 5 COMPOSITE BUDGET 4. GOAL....................................................................................................................... 5 5. CORE FUNCTIONS ................................................................................................. 5 6.DISTRICT ECONOMY .............................................................................................. 6 FOR 2021-2024 a. Agriculture............................................................................................................... 6 b. Market Centers ........................................................................................................ 7 d. Health ....................................................................................................................... 8 PROGRAMME BASED BUDGET ESTIMATES e. Water and Sanitation .............................................................................................. 8 7. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2020 ............................................................................... 9 8.REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE
    [Show full text]