DOCSLIB.ORG

Nominal GDP Targeting, NGDP, Nominal Income Targeting, Monetary Policy Frameworks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nominal GDP Targeting, NGDP, Nominal Income Targeting, Monetary Policy Frameworks Facts, Fears, and Functionality of NGDP Level Targeting: A Guide to a Popu lar Framework for Monetary Policy David Beckworth SPECIAL STUDY David Beckworth. “Facts, Fears, and Functionality of NGDP Level Targeting: A Guide to a Popu lar Framework for Monetary Policy.” Mercatus Special Study, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Arlington, VA, September 2019. ABSTRACT Nominal GDP level targeting (NGDPLT) has become an increasingly popu lar mon- etary policy framework over the past de cade. This rising popularity has led to increased interest in, as well as some confusion over, how this framework actually works. This paper attempts to address this interest by summarizing basic facts of NGDPLT and addressing some of the fears surrounding it. The paper also dem- onstrates how NGDPLT might work in practice. JEL codes: E50, E52, E58 Keywords: nominal GDP targeting, NGDP, nominal income targeting, monetary policy frameworks © 2019 by David Beckworth and the Mercatus Center at George Mason University This paper can be accessed at https://www.mercatus.org/publications/monetary -policy/facts-fears-and-functionality-ngdp-level-targeting-guide-popular The views expressed in Mercatus Special Studies are the authors’ and do not rep- resent official positions of the Mercatus Center or George Mason University. MERCATUS CENTER AT GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY 2 CONTENTS Introduction 5 I. Facts about Nominal GDP Level Targeting 7 Fact 1: NGDPLT Is a Dollar-Denominated Target 7 Fact 2: NGDPLT Is a Growth-Path Target 7 Fact 3: NGDPLT Is a Velocity-Adjusted Money Supply Target 9 Fact 4: NGDPLT Is a Work-Around to the Supply Shock Problem 11 Fact 5: NGDPLT Is a Work-Around to Incomplete Financial Markets 14 Fact 6: NGDPLT Is an Anti–Zero Lower Bound Tool 16 Fact 7: NGDPLT Is a Way to Do Rules-Based Monetary Policy 17 II. Fears about Nominal GDP Level Targeting 19 Fear 1: Changes in Potential Real GDP Will Create Problems for NGDPLT 19 Fear 2: Data Revisions Make NGDPLT an Impractical Framework 20 Fear 3: The Public Will Not Understand NGDPLT 22 Fear 4: NGDPLT Does Not Satisfy the “Price Stability” Part of the Dual Mandate 23 MERCATUS CENTER AT GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY 3 Fear 5: NGDPLT Does Not Address Financial Stability Concerns 26 Fear 6: Overshoots of an NGDP Target Would Be Politically Tough to Correct 26 Fear 7: NGDPLT Is Too Radical. Why Not Settle for Price Level Targeting? 27 III. Functionality: How to Implement Nominal GDP Level Targeting 28 IV. Conclusion 31 Appendix. Supply Shocks in a Monetary Policy–Phillips Curve Model 32 I. The MP-PC Model 32 II. A Temporary Supply Shock 33 III. A Permanent Supply Shock 35 Notes 37 MERCATUS CENTER AT GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY 4 INTRODUCTION oes the Federal Reserve need a new mone- One proposal for revamping the monetary tary policy framework? A growing number policy framework is for the Federal Reserve to Dof observers believe the answer is yes. Some adopt a nominal GDP level target. This approach see the Great Recession, the slow recovery from it, would have the Fed target a stable growth path and the per sis tent shortfall of inflation relative to for the total amount of spending in the economy. its target as evidence that the current approach to While not a new idea, nominal GDP level target- monetary policy is inadequate.1 Others worry that ing (NGDPLT) became popu lar in the aftermath the secular decline in interest rates is permanent of the Great Recession.3 and leaves insufficient room for the Fed to cut This rise in popularity can be seen in panel A interest rates in future recessions.2 These concerns of figure 1, which shows the results of Google and have caused many to call for an overhaul of the way Google Scholar searches for NGDP targeting. the Fed does monetary policy. Panel B of figure 1 indicates that not only does FIGURE 1. GOOGLE SEARCH RESULTS FOR ARTICLES ON NOMINAL GDP TARGETING Panel A. NGDP Targeting Search Panel B. Monetary Policy Frameworks Searches 180 5,000 5,000 160 140 4,000 4,000 120 3,000 100 3,000 80 All Articles All Articles 2,000 2,000 60 Scholarly Articles 40 1,000 1,000 20 0 0 0 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 All Articles: Google Search Price Level Targeting Scholarly Articles: Google Scholar Higher Inflation Target Nominal GDP Targeting Note: The search criteria used for nominal GDP targeting are as follows: “nominal GDP targeting” or “nominal GDP target” or “NGDP targeting” or “NGDP target” or “nominal income targeting” or “nominal income target.” For price level targeting, the search criteria used are “price level targeting” or “price level target.” For the higher inflation target, the search criterion is “higher inflation target.” The total number of search results for each year are used and were pulled from Google on April 9, 2019. MERCATUS CENTER AT GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY 5 NGDPLT remain popu lar, but it appears to be placed. This paper illustrates why by clarify- generating more interest than some other mon- ing what exactly NGDPLT is and by addressing etary policy framework proposals, such as price the misconceptions about it. Ultimately, this level targeting or a higher inflation target.4 paper shows that this monetary policy framework Like many popular phenomena, however, can be implemented in a stabilizing manner. NGDPLT has been misunderstood by some To that end, this paper provides a guide to observers, and this has led to confusion over what the facts, fears, and functionality of NGDPLT. It it would mean for monetary policy. Some believe, does so in an accessible and executive-summary- for example, that it would fail to anchor inflation styled format so that interested parties can easily expectations or that it would increase economic find specific issues surrounding NGDPLT while volatility.5 Others worry that NGDPLT is an still being able to get a complete picture of this impractical framework for monetary policy approach to monetary policy. The paper first looks because of changes in potential real GDP, data at seven facts and seven fears regarding NGDPLT. revisions, public confusion, and the mechanics of It then shows how NGDPLT might be imple- implementing it. mented in practice. The paper concludes with While all of these concerns about NGDPLT some practical suggestions for making the tran- are understandable, they are ultimately mis- sition to NGDPLT. MERCATUS CENTER AT GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY 6 I. FACTS ABOUT NOMINAL GDP LEVEL TARGETING FACT 1: NGDPLT IS A DOLLAR- where P is the price level and Y is real income. DENOMINATED TARGET Real income is inflation-adjusted income and is NGDPLT anchors the dollar size of the US econ- the real gains from working in the economy. omy. This mooring is accomplished by having Since NGDP = NGDI, (1) and (2) can be combined the central bank target the level of total dollar to get the following: spending in the economy. The total amount of MV = PY. (3) money spent, in turn, generates an equal amount of money earned in the economy. The former is Equation (3) is the famous equation of officially called nominal gross domestic product exchange, an accounting identity that relates (NGDP), while the latter is called nominal gross money transactions to money incomes. It implies domestic income (NGDI).6 Because these are that an NGDP target that stabilizes MV is equiva- equal, NGDPLT can be viewed as a target for lent to a nominal income target that stabilizes PY. both total dollar spending and total dollar In either case, the monetary policy goal is a income earned. As a consequence, some com- dollar- denominated target. mentators call this approach nominal income All of this means, as mentioned earlier, that targeting. NGDPLT anchors the dollar size of the economy. To better understand this connection, note Put differently, NGDPLT is a nominal anchor that that total dollar spending on the economy is keeps the growth of prices, wages, and other equal to the stock of money multiplied by how dollar- denominated activity moored so that often it is used. This decomposition of NGDP can they do not expand too rapidly. be summarized as follows: NGDP = MV, (1) FACT 2: NGDPLT IS A GROWTH- PATH TARGET where M is the total amount of money and V is NGDPLT requires the Fed to stabilize the level or the velocity, the number of times money gets growth path of NGDP. This means the Fed would used. Total dollar income can similarly be decom- have to make up for past misses from its target so posed into two parts: the price level times real that the targeted dollar level of NGDP is always income. This can be summarized as follows: maintained. This is illustrated in figure 2. It NGDI = PY, (2) shows a scenario where the Fed is targeting MERCATUS CENTER AT GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY 7 FIGURE 2. A NOMINAL GDP LEVEL TARGET Panel A. Correcting for Below-Target Growth Panel B. Correcting for Above-Target Growth Nominal GDP Level Target Nominal GDP Level Target h Target Target Growth Path Growth Pat Slow-down Growth ) ) Catch-Up Growth h NGDP (Dollars NGDP (Dollars Target Growth Pat Target Growth Path Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Year (Yt)Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Year (Yt) some growth rate— the slope of the line— for NGDP set of rows shows what happens when NGDP and makes up for periods of below- and above- grows below 4 percent in 2019 (Y1). The missed target growth so that the trend growth path is growth is made up in the next two years by hav- maintained.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Some Political Economy of Monetary Rules
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 Some Political Economy of Monetary Rules F ALEXANDER WILLIAM SALTER n this paper, I evaluate the efficacy of various rules for monetary policy from the perspective of political economy. I present several rules that are popular in I current debates over monetary policy as well as some that are more radical and hence less frequently discussed. I also discuss whether a given rule may have helped to contain the negative effects of the recent financial crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stance of Monetary Policy: the NGDP Gap
    POLICY BRIEF The Stance of Monetary Policy: The NGDP Gap David Beckworth April 2020 (updated May 11, 2020) One of the most important questions facing the Federal Reserve (Fed) is also one of the hardest for it to answer: What is the current stance of monetary policy? The answer to this question is straightforward in theory, but is quite challenging to apply in practice. Despite many valiant efforts by central bankers, academics, and market participants, there is still a lot of uncertainty in real time about whether monetary policy is too tight, too loose, or just about right. This policy brief attempts to add some clarity to this question by providing a new measure of the stance of monetary policy. This policy brief specifically shows how to construct a benchmark growth path for nominal GDP (NGDP) where monetary policy is neither expansionary nor contractionary. Deviations of actual NGDP from this neutral level of NGDP provide a way to assess the stance of monetary policy. These deviations, called the NGDP gap, can be used by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) as a cross-check on existing indicators of the stance of monetary policy. This new measure does not require knowledge of standard macroeconomic policy indicators such as r-star (the neutral real interest rate) or y-star (potential real GDP), and therefore avoids the challenges of “navigating by the stars” as outlined by Fed chair Jerome Powell.1 All it requires are some simple calculations applied to publicly available forecasts of NGDP. Despite its simplicity, the NGDP gap can be motivated from both New Keynesian and monetarist theory, and therefore can serve as a useful metric in these frameworks.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Policy Frameworks
    Monetary Policy Frameworks Loretta J. Mester President and Chief Executive Officer Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Panel Remarks for the National Association for Business Economics and American Economic Association Session, “Coordinating Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policies for Macroeconomic Stability” Allied Social Science Associations Annual Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 5, 2018 1 Introduction I thank George Kahn for inviting me to speak in this session. I will use my time to discuss the framework the FOMC uses for setting monetary policy and some alternative frameworks. Let me emphasize that this is a longer-run issue and not one that is of immediate concern. It lies in the realm of what economists and policymakers should have on their agendas for study given the economic developments we’ve seen over the past decade and what is expected over the coming decade. The views I’ll present are my own and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve System or my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee. The FOMC currently uses a flexible inflation-targeting framework to set monetary policy. It is briefly described in the FOMC’s statement on longer-run goals and monetary policy strategy.1 The U.S. adopted an explicit numerical inflation goal in January 2012. This is a symmetric goal of 2 percent, as measured by the year-over-year change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures, or PCE inflation. In establishing this numerical goal, the U.S. joined many other countries, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Sweden, and the U.K., as well as the European Central Bank, that conduct monetary policy with a goal of achieving an explicit inflation target.
    [Show full text]
  • Operating Objectives for Monetary Policy
    RESEARCH DISCUSSION PAPER OPERATING OBJECTIVES FOR MONETARY POLICY Malcolm Edey RDP 9007 RESEARCH DEPARTMENT RESERVE BANK OF AUSTRALIA The Discussion Paper series is intended to make the results of current economic research within the Reserve Bank available to other economists. Its aim is to present preliminary results of research so as to encourage discussion and comment. Views expressed in this paper are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Reserve Bank. Use of any results from this paper should clearly attribute the work to the author and not to the Reserve Bank of Australia. OPERATING OBJECTIVES FOR MONETARY POLICY Malcolm L. Edey* Research Discussion Paper 9007 November 1990 Research Department Reserve Bank of Australia * The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Reserve Bank of Australia. Abstract This paper investigates sin1ple monetary policy rules using a theoreticalrnodel of a sn1a1l open economy. The analysis is intended to highlight two problerns in policy formulation that are of particular irnportance to Australia: instability of the money demand function, and exposure of the economy to exten1al shocks. Among the class of sin1ple rules that are considered, it is shown that nominal income targeting consistently gives the lowest short-run variability of real output. In particular, such a policy outperforms both a monetary target and a fixed exchange rate. Problems of inaccurate infonnation and recognition lags reduce the attractiveness of all targeting rules relative to the alternative of fixing the exchange rate. However, these problems do not provide grounds for a return to simple fonns of n1onetary targeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Income As an Intermediate Target for Monetary Policy
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Timonen, Jouni Working Paper Nominal income as an intermediate target for monetary policy Bank of Finland Discussion Papers, No. 21/1995 Provided in Cooperation with: Bank of Finland, Helsinki Suggested Citation: Timonen, Jouni (1995) : Nominal income as an intermediate target for monetary policy, Bank of Finland Discussion Papers, No. 21/1995, ISBN 951-686-463-5, Bank of Finland, Helsinki, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:NBN:fi:bof-20140807492 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/211734 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially
    [Show full text]
  • Price Stability and Monetary Policy: a Proposal of a Non Active Policy Rule
    Cuadernos de economía (2011) 34, 62-72 Cuadernos de economía Spanish Journal of Economics and Finance vol. 34, n.° 2, mayo-agosto 2011 Sumario ÁLVAREZ ONDINA, Pedro; PÉREZ RIVERO, José Luis; DE VICENTE QUEIJEIRO, Saúl and VICENTE CUERVO, María Rosalía The determinants of the choice of exchange rate regimes in Latin America: Cuadernos de economía a mixed multinomial logit approach CASTAÑEDA, Juan E. and WOOD, Geoffrey E. Price stability and monetary policy: A proposal of a non active policy rule DE LUCAS SANTOS, Sonia; DELGADO RODRÍGUEZ, M. Jesús; ÁLVAREZ AYUSO, Inmaculada y CENDEJAS BUENO, José Luis Los ciclos económicos internacionales: antecedentes y revisión de la literatura DE VICENTE QUEIJEIRO, Saúl; PÉREZ RIVERO, José Luis y VICENTE CUERVO, María Rosalía ¿Se está rompiendo el mercado español? Una aplicación del enfoque de Feldstein-Horioka MUÑOZ, Félix-Fernando and ENCINAR, María-Isabel Firms’ connections and cluster opportunity. The case of biotechnology in the Community of Madrid publicación de la asociación de cuadernos de economía en colaboración con el departamento de teoría económica de la universidad de barcelona www.elsevier.es/cesjef y de la universidad autónoma de madrid ARTÍCULO Price stability and monetary policy: A proposal of a non active policy rule Juan E. Castañeda*,a and Geoffrey E. Woodb aDepartamento de Economía Aplicada y Gestión Pública, UNED, Madrid, Spain bFaculty of Finance, Cass Business School, London, United Kingdom Received July 15, 2011; accepted July 27, 2011 JEL CLASSIFICATION Abstract A new type of monetary policy rule designed to achieve both price and output E52; stability has increasingly been recommended during the last business cycle expansion, prior to E58 the 2007 crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Economics and Interest Rate Strategy: Monetary Targetry
    MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH EUROPE Happy 5th Birthday, Risk-Reward Morgan Stanley & Co. International Charles Goodhart plc+ Triangle! And it works. [email protected] +44 (0)20 7425 1854 Find out why... Melanie Baker, CFA [email protected] +44 (0)20 7425 8607 Jonathan Ashworth January 9, 2013 [email protected] +44 (0)20 7425 1820 Anthony S O'Brien UK Economics and [email protected] +44 (0)20 7677 7748 Interest Rate Strategy Monetary Targetry: Possible Charles Goodhart, Melanie Baker and Jonathan Ashworth are Economists. Anthony O’Brien is UK Interest Rate Strategist. Changes under Carney Their views are clearly delineated. We can see some merit in a temporary change in Charles Goodhart is a Senior Economic Consultant to Morgan BoE monetary policy towards a nominal GDP growth Stanley target. But it would come with significant risks and does not have a body of academic opinion behind it. A nominal GDP level target (a prospect raised in speeches by the future BoE Governor, Mark Carney) holds even less credence, in our view. Much more likely under the new BoE Governor, we think, would be changes in communication (conditional interest rate commitments) and, should the economy deteriorate further, purchases of non-gilt assets on a larger scale. We think a rate cut would also be a higher probability under the incoming governor. Market expectations for policy change are high: Investors and the British press seem increasingly convinced that the appointment of Mark Carney, who starts his new role as Bank of England Governor on 1st July 2013, will bring significant change to the way monetary policy is conducted, possibly towards a nominal GDP growth, rather than an inflation, target.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominal GDP Targeting and the Monetary Policy Framework
    Nominal GDP Targeting and the Monetary Policy Framework Shakill Hassan and Chris Loewald ERSA working paper 392 November 2013 Economic Research Southern Africa (ERSA) is a research programme funded by the National Treasury of South Africa. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the funder, ERSA or the author’s affiliated institution(s). ERSA shall not be liable to any person for inaccurate information or opinions contained herein. Nominal GDP Targeting and the Monetary Policy Framework Shakill Hassany Chris Loewaldz September, 2013 Abstract A nominal income target may provide credibility to a commitment to keep real interest rates exceptionally low, until a target output level is reached —even if expected inflationrises in the interim—in economies where nominal interest rates are effectively at the zero lower bound, which is not the South African case. There are practical diffi culties with adopting nominal income targeting as the monetary policy frame- work. These include issues on the choice of a target level, risk of unan- chored inflation expectations, and increased likelihood of error due to data uncertainty and revisions. Responsiveness to output growth and supply shocks —two important attractions of nominal income target- ing —can be largely accommodated within flexible inflation targeting. Neither regime will automatically resolve the challenges posed to mon- etary policy by volatile capital flows and exchange rates, and asset price bubbles. The case for abandoning flexible inflation targeting, to adopt nominal income targeting, in South Africa and other emerging economies, is not compelling. This is a revised and expanded version of an internal memo prepared and discussed in February 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal and Monetary Policy in a Commodity-Based Economy1
    Economics of Transition Volume 16(4) 2008, 679–713 Fiscalfrankel,BlackwellOxford,ECOTEconomics0967-0750©JournalXXXOriginal 2008 and TheUKcompilationArticles smitPublishing Monetary of Authors Transition and sturzenegger© LtdPolicy 2008 The European Bank for Reconstruction Development and monetary policy in a commodity-based economy1 Jeffrey Frankel*, Ben Smit† and Federico Sturzenegger* *John F. Kennedy School of Government and Center for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. E-mails: [email protected] and [email protected] †Bureau for Economic Research, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A rough description of macroeconomic policy in South Africa would be that monetary policy concentrates on building nominal credibility through focusing on inflation, while the brunt of the responsibility for output stabilization rests on fiscal policy. This aricle discusses the convenience of such a policy mix. First, we estimate the business cycle impact of fiscal and monetary policy to find that so far fiscal policy has been mostly pro-cyclical, whereas monetary policy has been, over the last couple of years, mildly counter-cyclical. We argue that fiscal policy should be made significantly more counter-cyclical than it has been – a strategy that would deliver more macroeconomic stability and potentially higher growth. Furthermore, we believe the Central Bank has earned the credibility to operate macro policy with a more decisive output stabilization objective, and we discuss several reinterpretations of the inflation targeting regime that provide the flexibility to do so without risking the strong anti-inflationary credibility of the SARB. On exchange rate policy we recommend that the authorities take a pragmatic approach to floating, mostly allowing the currency to move freely, but intervening to avoid overvaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Blast from the Past: Hayek, Gold, and Money
    Blast from the Past: Hayek, Gold, and Money Nikhil Sridhar Richard Salsman, Faculty Advisor 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Richard Salsman for his invaluable guidance in the writing of this paper and his incredible mentorship throughout my undergraduate career. I would also like to express my gratitude George Selgin of the Cato Institute’s Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives for recommending many of the sources used in this paper. Finally, there is little chance that this paper would have been completed without the endless debates on monetary economics with my dear friends Gaurav Sharma, Alexander Frumkin, and Aditya Paruchuri. 2 Abstract The resurgence of Austrian economics and the development of market monetarism as a school of thought since the Global Financial Crisis has brought NGDP targeting into the mainstream political economic discourse. This paper will discuss a close cousin of nominal income targeting, Hayek’s rule for monetary policy, and explore its relationship with the classical gold standard, as many advocates of a stable nominal income pathway have also expressed support for some form of a gold standard in the past. This paper offers a theoretical and historical exposition of Hayek’s rule and the classical gold standard before offering a comparative institutional analysis of these two monetary regimes with special consideration given to political economic considerations. 3 Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nominal Income Targeting
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Monetary Policy Volume Author/Editor: N. Gregory Mankiw, ed. Volume Publisher: The University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-50308-9 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/greg94-1 Conference Date: January 21-24, 1993 Publication Date: January 1994 Chapter Title: Nominal Income Targeting Chapter Author: Robert E. Hall, N. Gregory Mankiw Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8329 Chapter pages in book: (p. 71 - 94) 2 Nominal Income Targeting Robert E. Hall and N. Gregory Mankiw There is increasing agreement among economists on two broad principles of monetary policy. The first principle is that monetary policy should aim to stabi- lize some nominal quantity. Monetarists have sought to make monetary policy stabilize the growth of the nominal money stock. In some periods of history, policy has been committed to pegging the nominal price of gold. Some econo- mists have proposed stabilizing a bundle of commodity prices or even the con- sumer price index (CPI). The second principle, which was taken for granted up until the past fifty years, is the desirability of a credible commitment to a fixed rule for monetary policy. It is now apparent that there are substantial gains if the central bank commits in advance to a set policy, rather than leaving itself free to exercise unconstrained discretion. Traditionally, policy rules took the form of a commit- ted value for the monetary unit in terms of gold or silver. Today, the focus is on rules that promise to deliver better performance as measured by stability in output and prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominal Income Targeting Offers an American Finance Association, San Thread That Emerges from These Pro- Tent with These Ultimate Goals
    The alternative explanation as- private capital formation (see References Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland ISSN 0428·1276 sumes that wage- and price-setting box). Without complementary poli- Fellner, William. Towards a Reconstruction May 21,1984 institutions have an inflationary cies, it is doubtful that a decelerat- of Macroeconomics: Problems of Theory and Policy. Washington, DC: American bias. This bias arises because labor ing target path of nominal income Enterprise Institute, 1976. markets adjust slowly to changes could be achieved over a period Gordon, Robert]. "Using Monetary Control in economic conditions. Wage rates short enough for such a strategy to Dampen the Business Cycle: A New often fail to reflect the availability to be credible. Thus, if nominal Set of First Principles;' NBER Working of unemployed workers, either income trageting were to be a suc- Paper Series, No. 1210 (October 1983). Hall, Robert E. "Macroeconomic Policy because of established relation- cessful strategy during disinflation, under Structural Change;' Industrial ships between employers and their it would need to be part of an over- Change and Public Policy. A Symposium wor kers or because of a lack of all economic policy that included sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank competitive pressure-sometimes a consistent set of micro- and macro- of Kansas City, Jackson Hole, WY: shielded by foreign trade barriers. economic reforms. Otherwise, the August 24-26, 1983. Meade, James. "The Meaning of 'Internal Some advocates of nominal income Federal Reserve would risk losing Balance' ," Economic Journal, vol. 88 targeting who hold this view of the credibility it has already estab- (September 1978), pp.
    [Show full text]