GU President Sacked After Dramatic Vote
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
From Mike Leigh to Peter Pan Varsity walks you through British cinema - and ends up in Neverland Page 20 No. 606 The Independent Cambridge Student Newspaper since 1947 Friday October 29, 2004 Architects still working GU president sacked he after dramatic vote t Mockel-von-dem-Bussc Graduate Union saga comes to a close as ousted r lbe president Tharakan blames lack of support for failures A Amy Goodwin have confirmed the general sense of frustration and disappointment. For RIBU THARAKAN was sacked as many of those involved in the GU, Graduate Union president last night. Tharakan’s absence during the crucial In a notably acrimonious debate, hand-over stage in July foreshadowed MCR presidents and graduate facul- iona Symington all subsequent problems. ty representatives voted 23-6 in F The highly personalised and frac- favour of a motion of no confidence tious battle that marred the last proposed by members of the GU weeks of Tharakan’s tenure resulted Executive. In an emotionally fraught in David Riley being obliged to state plea to the council, Tharakan accused he would not himself run for presi- the Exec of reneging on their respon- dent ‘should the job become vacant’. sibility of supporting him in his role In addition to his mistrust of what he as president. He told Varsity:‘I have calls the ‘old guard’ of the GU, come to work here without a func- Tharakan pointed out that he had tioning Executive or support staff. I held the post for only four months have tried to work for the students, and had not had time either to suffi- but without these important people I ciently familiarise himself with the have been unsuccessful’. organisation or implement changes. The debate was disrupted when All of the main speakers emphasised Tharakan broke down. It was pro- their recognition that the job of pres- posed that the council should ident was, in the words of last year’s adjourn the meeting after it became president Sarah Airey, ‘too much for clear that Tharakan was unable to one person’. They concurred with continue a coherent defence of his CUSU president Wes Streeting, four months in the post. However, chairing the meeting, who said that the substantial body of GU members the GU’s problems were ‘historic and who had gathered for the vote decid- deep-rooted’. ed to resume proceedings, as it was Riley admitted in his rebuttal that Amol Rajan Board of the University, make him a felt that the GU would be neglecting ‘things were unarguably bad last year’, suitable replacement for Short. the University’s graduate community but stated that the situation had CUSU, UNDERGRADUATES and In a public statement on Wednesday if it failed to immediately resolve the begun to improve during Sarah staff at all levels within the Department morning by Professor Andrew Cliff, situation. Airey’s tenure. He then claimed that of Architecture have urged the Pro-Vice Chancellor for Personnel, it David Riley, who proposed the all of this progress had been ‘stalled’ University to continue to fund the emerged that academic but not financial motion, declared that the currently over the summer as a result of department for the next three years, problems within the department could ‘farcical’ state of affairs made it clear Tharakan making his case last night Tharakan’s inaction. At this stage claiming that there is no serious cause for lead to its closure. The statement noted to all that Tharakan’s presidency was Tharakan apologised to the GU both concern over its future. that the General Board felt “insufficient ‘not salvageable’. The GU has been ence at either the Freshers’ Fair or for the ‘commotion’ that he had Professor Alan Short has stepped progress” had been made in improving in a state of escalating crisis since the the CUSU Societies Fair. The union- caused earlier in the evening and for down from his post as the head of the research standards, and that “closure of beginning of the academic year, with run shop was closed due to staff the initial mistakes that he had made Department, and, pending ratification by the Department and redeployment of many services inoperative, numerous shortages throughout this period. as president. University authorities, will be replaced by the staff to other allied Departments key resignations and accusations of The Union has been plagued by The latter part of the debate Professor Marcial Echenique, a veteran would be justified.” financial mismanagement. internal disputes, allegedly stemming focused on the future of the GU. It with over 30 years experience in Support for the Department has been Tharakan has been held personally from Tharakan’s leadership. He has was agreed that whatever the out- Cambridge. ArcSoc called an open forthcoming. CUSU is to launch a cam- to blame for many of the setbacks been accused of large-scale misman- come of the vote, its role and struc- meeting with Short last Friday evening, paign to avert the department’s closure. that have impeded the Union’s recent agement, organisational apathy and a ture need to be radically rethought if which was open to all students and staff, After tabling an emergency motion, it has operations and damaged its image in lack of vision for the union, in con- it is to succeed in its aim of meeting at which he announced his departure. resolved to aid student representatives on the eyes of the graduate community, trast to the ambitious initiatives out- the specific needs of graduate stu- A joint email sent earlier that day by the General Board and University although he claimed last night that lined in his manifesto. Relations with dents within the University. The him and Echenique said that the Council in “opposing any moves by the ‘not one of the problems was the both MCRs and the University have meeting ended with the passing of a Department was “entering a period of University to close the Architecture direct result of my actions’. Foremost deteriorated due to a lack of commu- motion which invested the vice pres- intense negotiation and strategic plan- Department”. Other senior figures with- amongst the issues discussed was the nication and actions conflicting ident, Rhiannon Mohammed, with ning”, and that Echenique would “lead in the University have also offered their Union’s virtual invisibility during directly with those mandated. Recent the authority to organise elections these discussions”. Echenique’s support. A final decision will be made on Freshers’ Week. Handbooks for new resignations from the Executive, and pledged to reassess the situation appointment has been widely welcomed December 8th as to whether or not the graduate students were not distrib- including that of former president in ten days’ time. by students and staff, who feel that his proposals be taken to Regent House. uted until two weeks after the last Sarah Airey who was co-opted onto experience of University management, - Architecture’s impact in had arrived, and the GU had no pres- the committee to ease the transfer, -Editorial: Page 11 including a term of office on the General Cambridge: Page 6 “OXFORD HAS AN INFERIORITY COMPLEX” PAGE 7 VIRGINIA WOOLF WILL BLOW YOUR HOUSE DOWN PAGE 16 2 NEWS October 29, 2004 www.varsity.co.uk Tiddlywinks tournament at Queen’s Student attacked for £15 Chine Mbubaegbu warning to students urging them to be services to students, such as alarms or vigilant whilst in the city at night. taxi services, in order to protect them THE ISSUE of student safety has been Sergeant Jonathan Hutchinson, head from such vicious attacks. highlighted again as a student found of the newly formed robbery squad CUSU’s Welfare Officer Richard himself the victim of a vicious attack in said: “I am giving people practical advice Reid said “Obviously we’re very con- which he was robbed for just £15. on how to try to reduce the risk of them cerned by these attacks, as we want our Kristian Coates-Ulrichsen, who is becoming a victim of a street robbery. students to be safe. It can be difficult for studying for a PhD in history at Most commonly this type of crime is colleges to ensure the safety of students Pembroke College, was on his way from committed by opportunistic thieves, so I when they are outside the college area, t Mockel von dem Bussche-Ippenburg von t Mockel r a formal to the college’s graduate accom- am urging people to, as much as possi- but obviously we would encourage col- lbe modation in Grantchester Meadows on ble, take that opportunity away.” leges to do what they can.” A Thursday when the incident occurred. Kristian Coates-Ulrichsen, who Having formerly been a student at He described how he was followed along suffered cuts and bruising to the face UCL in London, Coates-Ulrichsen the towpath near the Mill Lane area by and ribs, said that he is lucky the men highlighted the differences between two young men who subsequently struck did not have knives. He emphasised the two cities. Although people may him from behind and began to assault the importance, however, of the see Cambridge as a small University him. Both men kicked and punched University doing better to protect its town, it does not necessarily mean LAST WEEKEND Queen’s College cation to two-hour daily practices nor Ulrichsen, demanding that he give them students. He told Varsity: “The that it is a safer place. London stu- hosted the premier event of the his personalised squidgers were of any his wallet. They continued to assault Mr. University and colleges could make it dents are more vigilant, and since the Tiddlywinks calendar, the World use once up against the UCL lecturer’s Coates-Ulrichsen even after he threw safer for students who live in college capital is more populated, there are Singles Tournament.