DOCSLIB.ORG

Democracy in Crawley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Democracy in Crawley CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE - 5 January 2015 REPORT NO: PES/150 B ITEM REF NO LOCATION RECOMMEND 001 CR/2014/0644/FUL 3 RICHMOND COURT, SOUTHGATE, PERMIT CRAWLEY 002 CR/2014/0669/FUL UNITS 20/21, GATWICK PERMIT INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION CENTRE, COBHAM WAY, NORTHGATE, CRAWLEY 003 CR/2014/0671/OUT WILTSHIRES FLORIST, BALCOMBE REFUSE ROAD, POUND HILL, CRAWLEY 004 CR/2014/0732/FUL CGG SERVICES (UK) LTD, PERMIT CROMPTON WAY, NORTHGATE, CRAWLEY 005 CR/2014/0744/FUL BROADFIELD BARTON PARADE, PERMIT BROADFIELD, CRAWLEY 006 CR/2014/0751/FUL CRAWLEY YOUTH CENTRE, PERMIT LONGMERE ROAD, WEST GREEN, CRAWLEY 007 CR/2014/0766/P24 LAND AT CORNER OF HYDE DRIVE NO AND DOBBINS PLACE, IFIELD, OBJECTION CRAWLEY 008 CR/2014/0780/CON LAND EAST OF EMMANUEL OBJECTION COTTAGE, RUSPER ROAD, IFIELD, CRAWLEY CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE - 5 January 2015 REPORT NO: PES/150 ITEM NO: 001 REFERENCE NO: CR/2014/0644/FUL LOCATION: 3 RICHMOND COURT, SOUTHGATE, CRAWLEY PROPOSAL: EXTENSION TO FRONT PORCH AND EXISTING GARAGE, SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION, FIRST FLOOR SIDE EXTENSION ABOVE EXISTING GARAGE AND UTILITY ROOM AND GARAGE CONVERSION INTO A LOUNGE/PLAYROOM (AMENDED DESCRIPTION) TARGET DECISION DATE: 14 November 2014 CASE OFFICER: Ms E. Wachiuri APPLICANTS NAME: Mr Aaron Dorley AGENTS NAME: Blackstone Architects PLANS & DRAWINGS CONSIDERED: 135-002 Existing Ground & First Floor Plans, 135-003 Existing Front, Side & Rear Extensions, 135-011 Proposed Ground & First Floor Plans, 135-012 Proposed Front, Side & Rear Extensions, 135-001 Rev A Site Location Plan, Block Plan NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATIONS:- 4 to 8 and 10 Clitherow Gardens; 1 to 15 Rosemead Gardens: RESPONSES RECEIVED:- Twelve objections in total were received; one from Rosemead Gardens Management Company and the other eleven from 8 households, raising the following concerns: The house will be used as a house in multiple occupancy due to the proposed 5 bedrooms with 3 bathrooms allowing more to live in the property and separately Increased traffic and parking problems Risk of accident involving young children who play in the private road due to increased traffic The resultant house due to its size will be out of keeping with other houses and apartments in the street Likely to result in disruptions to the occupants of the cul-de-sac Resultant traffic congestion would pose threat to emergency services access to the area Overlooking of private gardens and living spaces in neighbouring flats in Rosemead Gardens Impact on value and saleability of the neighbouring properties Construction work of this scale in such confines will prevent reasonable access to the flats of Rosemead Gardens and the neighbouring properties and poses risk of damage to vehicles and buildings nearby The proposed rear extension will bring the property closer to the Rosemead Gardens flat causing overlooking issues Some neighbours in Clitherow Gardens not notified Overshadowing of neighbouring rear garden Overbearing and dominating impacts REASON FOR REPORTING TO COMMITTEE:- The application received more than four objections THE APPLICATION SITE:- 1.1 The application site comprises a two storey detached dwelling to the south of Richmond Court. The surrounding area is characterised by relatively small detached, semi-detached and terraced properties set within compact plots. 1.2 Further to the south-east of the application site are residential flats, so the streetscene is varied. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:- 2.1 Planning permission is sought for the erection of extension to front porch and existing garage, single storey rear extension, first floor side extension above existing garage and utility room and garage conversion into a lounge/playroom (amended description). The original description was amended to include the proposed conversion of the garage into a habitable room. 2.2 The extension to front porch would measure 1.5m deep by 2.3m wide by 2.3m high to the eaves and 3.4m high to the ridge. It would be continuous with the garage extension which would be 0.8m deep by 3m wide by 2.3m high to the eaves and 3.4m high to the ridge. 2.3 The single storey rear extension would measure approx. 3m deep on the western end and extend to 4.1m deep on the eastern end. It would have a height of 2.2m to the eaves and 3.5m to the ridge. It would leave a 1m boundary gap on either side. 2.4 The first floor side extension above the existing garage would measure 2.6m wide and flush with the existing rear wall. It would be setback 0.5m from the main façade and inset 0.2m below the main ridgeline. It would retain the existing side boundary gap which tapers front (1.5m wide) to back (1m wide). 2.5 A first floor side window is proposed but would be obscured glazed and this can also be enforced through a planning condition. 2.6 The materials would match the existing. PLANNING HISTORY:- 3.1 CR/2002/0536/FUL- Planning permission was granted for the conversion and extension of existing garage to form bedroom and erection of single storey rear extension (amended description) 3.2 The house was built under original permission reference CR/96/0342/FUL- (Retention of existing house with erection of 3 garages and erection of 8 new houses with garaging, parking and shared driveway access). Condition 3 of this permission restricted garage conversion without planning permission. PLANNING POLICY:- 4.1 NPPF (2012) Section 7: Requiring Good Design 4.2 Crawley Borough Core Strategy (2008) EN5: All new development should be based on a thorough understanding of the context, significance and distinctiveness of its site and surroundings and be of a high quality in terms of its urban landscape and architectural design and materials 4.3 Crawley Borough Local Plan (2000) GD1: Development should be appropriate to its location, site and premises in terms of scale, form, density, massing, character, appearance and materials. Proposals should not cause unreasonable harm to the amenities and environment of its surroundings by reason of overlooking, dominance or overshadowing. Proposals should safeguard any attractive and important natural or built features of the site which make a positive contribution to the character of the locality and provide a satisfactory environment for those who will occupy, use or visit the development. GD2: Development should relate sympathetically to its surroundings and respect the character, quality and special features of its setting. H19: Proposals for residential extensions will only be permitted if the type, size, and design of extension do not have an adverse impact on the amenity and privacy of neighbouring property and upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area. The character and style of the existing property is retained and with no unacceptable loss of garden space. Sufficient car parking should be retained within the curtilage of the dwelling. 4.4 SPG’s SPG Note 5: Residential Extensions SPG 5 states that two storey side extensions can result in the creation of terracing and require careful design. Also, the guidance advises that it is important for the extension to fit in with its surroundings and to avoid windows that directly overlook the neighbour’s garden. High level windows or obscure glass windows, with their lower portions fixed shut, may be acceptable. SPG 5 states that, front extensions cause one of the most significant alterations to the appearance of the house and street scene. It advises that only in exceptional circumstances will extensions which project more than 1.5m beyond the main house frontage be permitted. SPD 1 ‘Planning Obligations and S106 Agreements’ seek to ensure the parking requirements for any development is met. It states that for a 3 bedroom plus dwelling parking provision should be at a maximum standard of 2-3 parking spaces. In the case of an application to extend or convert a 3 bed dwelling to a 4 bed dwelling, an additional car parking space will not be sought. 4.5 Emerging Policy The emerging Local Plan was formerly Submitted to the Planning Inspectorate on the 26th November 2014, the policies within it now have some weight as they have now been subject to public consultation and endorsed by Full Council and set out the intended policy stance for the LPA. Policy CH3 covers the normal requirements of all new development and suggests that proposals should be based on a thorough understanding of the significance and distinctiveness of the site and its immediate and wider context. Development should relate sympathetically to their surroundings in terms of scale, density, layout, details and materials. Proposals should provide a good standard of amenity for all existing and future occupants of land and buildings. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:- 5.1 The main considerations in the determination of the application are: • Impact on the existing dwelling, street scene and wider area • Impact on neighbour amenity • Parking Impact on the existing dwelling, street scene and wider area; 5.2 In terms of the impact on the character and appearance of the existing building and its resulting impact on the street scene, the first floor side extension has been designed to accord with the appearance of the existing dwelling. This element of the proposal would have matching eaves and similar fenestration. It would have a width of approx. 2.6m which is less than half the width of the dwelling house. It would be set back by 0.5m from the front elevation and set down from the ridge, which would create an extension subordinate to the main dwelling and a visual break. 5.3 The first floor side extension would retain the existing boundary gap to the common boundary with no.5 Clitherow gardens. In addition, there would be no alterations at ground floor level and the neighbouring property backs onto the application site and as such would be over 5m distant from the proposed development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies PDF 1 MB
    Crawley Borough Council Report to Governance Committee 28th November 2017 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies Report of the Head of Legal and Democratic Services: LDS/133 1. Purpose 1.1 This report informs the Committee of the revised proposals of the Boundary Commission for England for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries as they affect Crawley. 2. Recommendations 2.1 That representations be made to the Boundary Commission for England that the Rusper and Colgate ward should be included in Crawley parliamentary constituency. 3. Reasons for the Recommendations 3.1 The residents of Kilnwood Vale will receive significant services from Crawley constituency and would be best represented by the Member of Parliament for Crawley. 4. Background 4.1 In 2016 the Boundary Commission for England (BCE) announced the start of a Review of Parliamentary constituencies. At its meeting held on 14th November 2017 the Governance Committee considered the initial proposals of the Boundary Commission for England (BCE) for a new parliamentary constituency for Crawley as part of the review of constituencies under the provisions of the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011. 4.2 The new rules involve a reduction in the number of Constituencies in England from 533 to 501, and state that each constituency must have an electorate, at December 2015, no smaller than 71,031 and no bigger than 78,507. 4.3 At present, the boundaries of Crawley Constituency and Crawley Borough are co- terminus. The parliamentary electorate for Crawley on 1st December 2015 was 70,578 and therefore is not big enough to remain co-terminus with the borough boundary under the new rules.
    [Show full text]
  • HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL – LIST of NEW APPS (Parish Order) Data Produced 7Th August 2017
    HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL – LIST OF NEW APPS (Parish Order) Data produced 7th August 2017 Parish: Billingshurst PC Ward: Billingshurst and Shipley Case No: DC/17/1673 Case Officer: Luke Simpson Date Valid: 28 July 2017 Comments by: 1 September 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Householder Agent: Applicant: Mr and Mrs Matthew Odell Proposal: Proposed erection of a single storey domestic stable block with pitched gable roof and storage/office space above. (Revised scheme to that previously approved under application DC/14/2097). Site Address: South Lodge New Road Billingshurst West Sussex RH14 9DT Grid Ref: 510021 126858 Parish: Bramber PC Ward: Bramber, Upper Beeding and Woodmancote Case No: DC/17/1245 Case Officer: Nicola Mason Date Valid: 17 July 2017 Comments by: 15 August 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Minor Dwellings Agent: Mark Folkes Applicant: Mr David King Proposal: Proposed erection of a single two storey dwelling (Amendments to previously approved application DC/16/1088) Site Address: Land To The Rear of Crimond Maudlin Lane Bramber Steyning West Sussex Grid Ref: 517942 110615 Parish: Cowfold PC Ward: Cowfold,Shermanbury and West Grinstead Case No: DC/17/1680 Case Officer: Tamara Dale Date Valid: 28 July 2017 Comments by: 1 September 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Change of Use Agent: Mr Matthew Brockhurst Applicant: Mr K Strange Proposal: Proposed change of use and associated works to convert existing agricultural barn/store into self- contained 1 bedroom accommodation unit
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of a Planning Meeting of Colgate Parish Council Held on 25Th Nov 2020 Remotely. Present Councillors: C. Crosdil, S
    Minutes of a Planning Meeting of Colgate Parish Council held on 25th Nov 2020 remotely. Present Councillors: C. Crosdil, S Garley , S. Davies, S. Marley, J Sired and V. Finnegan Apologies were accepted: R Calvert ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Minutes of the last meeting. None. 2. Declaration of Interests None 3. Members of the public- None 4. Applications. DC/20/2223 Reserved matters application for Phase 6A of the Kilnwood Vale development, comprising 168 dwellings with associated landscaping, play space and parking following approval of outline application DC/17/2481 relating to layout, scale, appearance and landscaping. Land Within Phase 6 Kilnwood Vale Crawley Road Faygate No Comments 5. Decisions Application Number: DC/20/1904 Site: Acorn House 11 Beedingwood Drive Colgate Horsham West Sussex RH12 4TE Description: Surgery to 1 x Beech Decision: Application Permitted Date of Decision: 11/11/2020 Application Number: DC/20/1692 Site: 1 Beedingwood Drive Colgate Horsham West Sussex RH12 4TE Description: Fell 1 x Oak Decision: Application Permitted 1 Date of Decision: 17/11/2020 Application Number: DC/20/1745 Site: Street Record Beedingwood Drive Colgate West Sussex Description: Fell 1 x Pussy Willow and Surgery to 1 x Silver Birch Decision: Application Permitted Date of Decision: 17/11/2020 Application Number: DC/20/1782 Site: 1 Coach House Colgate Lodge Blackhouse Road Colgate Horsham West Sussex RH13 6HS Description: Variation of Condition
    [Show full text]
  • Land West of Crawley, Rusper Site Area: ´ 190 Hectares
    Land West of Crawley, Rusper Site area: ´ 190 hectares The site primarily comprises arable and pasture fields bounded by hedgerows and mature trees together with a golf course. The wider area of study is located north of the A264 from Faygate in the west and extends in an arc north west towards Crawley, Gatwick Airport and the A23. To the east, the site adjoins the neighbourhood of Ifield, in Crawley and Gatwick Airport is to the north. Horsham District Council Local Plan Review 2020 Parkside, Chart Way, Horsham West Sussex RH12 1RL Potential Strategic Allocations Barbara Childs : Director of Place over 800 dwellings Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey map on behalf of HMSO. © Crown copyright and database rights (2020). Reference No : Date : 24 January 2020 Scale : 1:5,000 at A2 Ordnance Survey Licence.100023865 Drawing No : Drawn : Checked : Revisions : Homes England have identified an area of search that sweeps Pros and Cons from Faygate to the west of Crawley. Homes England suggest • If allocated the site would help the Council to meet a significant up to 10,000 homes could be delivered. Within the area of proportion of the Government’s housing requirements and search, land immediately to the West of Ifield is being promoted would provide new facilities and services such as shops and for around 3,000 homes and Land to the West of Kilnwood Vale schools and leisure facilities. Many of these could be delivered (not shown in the map above) is being promoted for around early in the development. 800 homes. These would form part the 10,000 homes if the site • Potential to provide new employment land.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITAL Project Trust
    CAPITAL Project Trust Opening Doors to Mental Wellbeing Information and Resources Handbook To Support You and Your Mental Health during Social Distancing and Self Isolation due to Covid-19 Information gathered from multiple sources including Pathfinder, Local Councils and other Charities. Information is subject to change. CAPITAL Project Trust would like to thank all providers for their support and advice. Compiled by CAPITAL Project Trust, April 2020 1 Contents Page Mental Health Apps 3 - 8 Wellbeing Websites 9 - 10 Support Available - Specific Area 11 - 15 Foodbanks 16 - 17 Domestic Abuse Support 18 - 19 Crisis Support Information 20 Pathfinder Contact Details 21 - 22 2 Wellbeing and Mental Health Apps Compiled by Pathfinder West Sussex https://www.pathfinderwestsussex.org.uk/ Self-Management Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) Free and available for App Store and Play store. • The WRAP is a simple and powerful process for creating the life and wellness you want. • Using the WRAP App, you can develop your WRAP, carry it with you wherever you go and share it with whomever you want. • Based on the WRAP Workbook, the WRAP App walks you through the process of creating your personal WRAP. Use it on your own, with a friend or supporter, or in a WRAP group. Recovery Path - Free to download and available on App Store as well as Play store • For people with addictive behaviour • This app offers many strategies to overcome cravings and supports the user to develop a path to sustained recovery, share progress with others and receive support. MyPlan • MyPlan is a tool to help women with safety decisions, such as abuse in their intimate relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031 Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Contents Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031
    Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031 Image donated by Ian Mulcahy Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Published by Rusper Parish Council 17 July 2020 Rusper Neighbourhood Plan - Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Page 1 Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031 Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Contents Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031...........................................................................................2 Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner....................................2 1.Foreword - Coalescence...................................................................................................................3 2.Planning Policy Context – Paragraph 3.8..........................................................................................3 3.Planning Policy Context – Paragraph 3.12........................................................................................4 4.Planning Policy Context – Paragraph 3.14........................................................................................4 5.Planning Policy Context – Plan C......................................................................................................5 6.Policy RUS1 – Landscape areas.......................................................................................................5 7.Policy RUS2 – Brownfield developments..........................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL – LIST of NEW APPS (Parish Order) Data Produced 08/05/17
    HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL – LIST OF NEW APPS (Parish Order) Data produced 08/05/17 Parish: Ashington PC Ward: Chanctonbury Case No: DC/17/0944 Case Officer: Will Jones Date Valid: 27 April 2017 Comments by: 26 May 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Not Required on Return Agent: Mrs Ann Callaghan Applicant: Saxon Weald Proposal: Surgery to 1 x Horse Chestnut Site Address: 6 Woelfs Close London Road Ashington Pulborough West Sussex RH20 3JU Grid Ref: 513216 116217 Parish: Cowfold PC Ward: Cowfold,Shermanbury and West Grinstead Case No: DC/17/0893 Case Officer: Will Jones Date Valid: 24 April 2017 Comments by: 23 May 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Not Required on Return Agent: Mrs Ann Callaghan Applicant: Saxon Weald Proposal: Fell 1 x Cherry Tree (Works to Trees in a Conservation Area) Site Address: Mercers Mead Oakfield Road Cowfold West Sussex Grid Ref: 521431 122432 Parish: Colgate PC Ward: Rusper and Colgate Case No: DC/17/0943 Case Officer: Jason Hawkes Date Valid: 27 April 2017 Comments by: 2 June 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Smallscale Major Other Agent: Sarah Beuden Applicant: c/o Agent Proposal: Development of a green route and attenuation pond to serve Phases 1, 2 and 3, with associated drainage and landscaping Site Address: Kilnwood Vale Crawley Road Faygate West Sussex Grid Ref: 523516 135034 Parish: Denne NC Ward: Horsham Park Case No: DC/17/0807 Case Officer: Will Jones Date Valid: 3 May 2017 Comments by: 28 April 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Not Required
    [Show full text]
  • Horsham Proposal
    Boundary Review of West Sussex County Council Draft proposals for Horsham: July 2015 Horsham District Proposal: Divisions affected: (a) Billingshurst Loses part of the Parish of Shipley (Polling Districts PN and PQE) (b) Southwater & Nuthurst (rename to Southwater & Shipley) Gains part of the Parish of Shipley (Polling Districts PN and PQE) Loses part of the parish of Nuthurst and the parish of Lower Beeding (Polling districts PA and NM) (c) Warnham & Rusper (rename to Broadbridge) Gains Broadbridge Heath (Polling Districts NGA and NGB) Loses Rusper and Colgate (polling districts PL, NZ, NSA, NSB, NSC, NSD and NJ) (d) Roffey (rename to Horsham East) Gains parts of Roffey South (polling districts NVB and NVC) and part of Forest (polling district NRA) Loses part of Roffey South (polling district NVA) to St Leonard’s Forest Loses 19 houses on Station Road to Horsham Hurst (e) Horsham Riverside Gains Denne (polling districts NN and NO). Loses part of Roffey South (polling districts NVB and NVC) and part of Forest (polling district NRA). Loses part of polling district PJ. (f) Horsham Hurst Gains part (672 electors in April 2015) of PJ Horsham Park 3 (Millais school area) from Riverside Gains 19 houses on Station Road from Roffey. (g) Horsham Tanbridge & Broadbridge Heath – DIVISION REMOVED (i) St Leonard’s Forest – NEW DIVISION to comprise: NVA Roffey S from Roffey, NM Crabtree (Lower Beeding area), PA Mannings Heath from Southwater, NSA, NSB, NSC Faygate 1,2 & 3 , NJ Colgate, NZ Ifield & PL Rusper from Warnham (j) Divisions unchanged: Bramber Castle, Henfield, Holbrook, Pulborough and Storrington. Key Considerations: This proposal has two small divisions in 2015 (Broadbridge and St Leonards Forest) and one over 10% (Storrington).
    [Show full text]
  • Horsham Proposal
    Boundary Review of West Sussex County Council Draft proposals for Horsham: July 2015 Horsham District Proposal: Divisions affected: (a) Billingshurst Farmhouses accessed from Black Gate Lane to move from Billingshurst to Pulborough (29 electors) (b) Southwater & Nuthurst Loses part of the parish of Nuthurst and the parish of Lower Beeding (Polling districts PA and NM) (c) Warnham & Rusper (rename to Broadbridge) Gains Broadbridge Heath (Polling Districts NGA and NGB) Loses Rusper and Colgate (polling districts PL, NZ, NSA, NSB, NSC, NSD and NJ) (d) Roffey (rename to Horsham East) Gains parts of Roffey South (polling districts NVB and NVC) and part of Forest (polling district NRA) Loses part of Roffey South (polling district NVA) to St Leonard’s Forest Loses 19 houses (22 electors) on Station Road to Horsham Hurst (e) Horsham Riverside Gains Denne (polling districts NN and NO). Loses part of Roffey South (polling districts NVB and NVC) and part of Forest (polling district NRA). Loses part of polling district PJ. (f) Horsham Hurst Gains part (672 electors) of PJ Horsham Park 3 (Millais school area) from Riverside Gains 19 houses (22 electors) on Station Road from Roffey. 12 properties on the south side of Depot Road, west of Owers Close transferred from Riverside to Hurst (20 electors). (g) Horsham Tanbridge & Broadbridge Heath – DIVISION REMOVED (i) St Leonard’s Forest – NEW DIVISION to comprise: NVA Roffey S from Roffey, NM Crabtree (Lower Beeding area), PA Mannings Heath from Southwater, NSA, NSB, NSC Faygate 1,2 & 3 , NJ Colgate, NZ Ifield & PL Rusper from Warnham (m) Pulborough To gain farmhouses accessed from Black Gate Lane to move from Billingshurst (29 electors) Divisions unchanged: (j) Bramber Castle, (k) Henfield, (l) Holbrook, and (n) Storrington.
    [Show full text]
  • Land North of Horsham – Parish Liaison Group Notes of a Meeting
    Land north of Horsham – Parish Liaison Group Notes of a meeting with Liberty Property Trust held on Friday 8th September 2017 at 12pm at Roffey Millennium Hall. Purpose of the meeting:- To initiate discussions following the approval of planning application DC/16/1677 (subject to agreement of Section 106 contributions and conditions) for development north of Horsham. The application includes housing (up to 2,750 dwellings), a business park (up to 46,450 m2), retail, community centre, leisure facilities, education facilities, public open space, landscaping and related infrastructure and has reserved matters except for access. In attendance :- Liberty Property Trust (LPT) – Derek Lloyd, Katie Ireland North Horsham Parish Council - Cllr Alan Britten, Cllr Roland Knight, Richard Millington, Cllr Ray Turner, Cllr Ian Wassell, Cllr Sally Wilton. Horsham District Council (HDC) – Trevor Beadle Resident – Laurie Holt St. Mark’s Church – Rachel Stoffel, Mike Nelson Horsham Cycling Forum (HCF) – Ruth Fletcher, Thea Bredie-Turnbull Notes – Pauline Whitehead Cllr Alan Britten chaired the meeting. 1. Welcome and apologies Cllr Britten invited all present to introduce themselves. Apologies were given by Cllr D Searle. 2. Initiation of discussion Development and buildings LPT reported that discussion between the legal teams at LPT and HDC regarding the complex, legal aspects of Section 106 and planning conditions associated with the application are still in progress. At the same time LPT is working to progress how the development will be phased and working through the conditions and strategies associated with the application for compliance with the necessary, appropriate policies. Work is being progressed to make differences in terminology consistent.
    [Show full text]
  • Kilnwood Vale Crawley Road Faygate West Sussex WARD: Rusper and Colgate
    PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Planning Committee North BY: Head of Development DATE: 6 February 2018 Outline planning application for the development of approximately 227 dwellings (between 204 and 250 dwellings) with the construction of a new DEVELOPMENT: access from Calvert Link, a pumping station and associated amenity space (all matters reserved except for access). SITE: Land To The West of Phase 1 Kilnwood Vale Crawley Road Faygate West Sussex WARD: Rusper and Colgate APPLICATION: DC/17/2481 Name: Crest Nicholson Operations Limited APPLICANT: Address: c/o Savills, 2 Charlotte Place, Southampton REASON FOR INCLUSION ON THE AGENDA: More than eight representations received which are contrary to the officer recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: That planning permission be delegated for approval to the Development Manager: - subject to completion of a legal agreement and appropriate conditions. The legal agreement will secure affordable housing provision (40%), open space provision and contributions for education, libraries, fire and rescue services, health improvements, community and sports facilities. - subject to the submission of satisfactory evidence to address the late objection received from Wealden District Council regarding the impact on the Ashdown Forest Special Area of Conservation and subject no objection to the evidence from Natural England. 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 1.1 To consider the planning application. DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLICATION 1.2 Outline planning permission is sought for the development of approximately 227 dwellings on ‘Reserve Land’ that forms part of the West of Bewbush (West of Crawley) strategic development site. This equates to between 204 and up to 250 dwellings. The proposal includes the construction of a new access from Calvert Link, a pumping station and associated amenity space.
    [Show full text]
  • Invoice Crawley Number: 14095 West Sussex Date: 19Th Feb '20 RH10 5ER Due By: 11Th Mar '20 United Kingdom Account: WOOD01 Purchase Order
    SSALC Limited Sackville House Brooks Close Lewes VAT Number: 167413406 East Sussex,BN7 2FZ T: 01273 830 200 United Kingdom E: fi[email protected] Woodmancote Parish Council 48 Titmus Drive Invoice Crawley Number: 14095 West Sussex Date: 19th Feb '20 RH10 5ER Due By: 11th Mar '20 United Kingdom Account: WOOD01 Purchase Order: Qty Descrip on Rate Total VAT 1 Chairmanship, Governance & Mee ngs Training ‐ 27th Feb 90.00 90.00 18.00 2020 Natwest. Sort Code: 60‐13‐09 Account Number: 42329833 Net: £90.00 Cheques should be made payable to SSALC Limited. VAT @ 20%: £18.00 Company Registra on: 08512101 TOTAL: £108.00 1st March, 2020. To: Horsham District Council Re: Planning – Residents against Mayfield Proposals. On 23rd January 2020 I had a meeting with Peter Freeman, Chairman of Mayfield and Debbie Aplin, MD of Mayfield. My aim with this meeting, following on from my letter to them last year, was to find out what is really going on. During this meeting, Peter and Debbie made many ludicrous statements with no relation whatsoever to reality, and I brought reality to their attention on each occasion. One point Peter agreed with me; {if this nightmare is not quoshed)for the next fifteen to twenty years our already overloaded roads will be full of builders lorries, cement trucks, equipment and supplies and product lorries – there will be no let up. They talked of ‘creating a community’ and I was able to explain we already have a wonderful close community in this area based on everyone working and socialising together, those who commute come together with us in social hours in our wonderful environment.
    [Show full text]