DOCSLIB.ORG

Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031 Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Contents Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031 Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Contents Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031 Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031 Image donated by Ian Mulcahy Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Published by Rusper Parish Council 17 July 2020 Rusper Neighbourhood Plan - Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Page 1 Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031 Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Contents Rusper Neighbourhood Plan 2018 – 2031...........................................................................................2 Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner....................................2 1.Foreword - Coalescence...................................................................................................................3 2.Planning Policy Context – Paragraph 3.8..........................................................................................3 3.Planning Policy Context – Paragraph 3.12........................................................................................4 4.Planning Policy Context – Paragraph 3.14........................................................................................4 5.Planning Policy Context – Plan C......................................................................................................5 6.Policy RUS1 – Landscape areas.......................................................................................................5 7.Policy RUS2 – Brownfield developments..........................................................................................5 8.Policy RUS1 & RUS8 – Distinction against NPPF and HDPF...........................................................6 9.Policy RUS3 – Design.......................................................................................................................6 10.Policy RUS5 – Green infrastructure................................................................................................6 11.Appendix D – Local Green Spaces Report......................................................................................7 12.Local Green Spaces Representations.............................................................................................7 13.Local Gaps......................................................................................................................................7 14.Policy RUS9 – Community Facilities...............................................................................................8 15.Policy RUS7 – Local Green Spaces................................................................................................8 16.Policy RUS9 – Community use viability...........................................................................................9 17.Policy RUS10 – School site.............................................................................................................9 18.Policy RUS12 – Promoting Sustainable Transport........................................................................10 19.Policy Maps...................................................................................................................................10 20.Implementation..............................................................................................................................11 Appendix 1 – Proposed Changes To The Submission Plan...............................................................12 1. In response to questions 4 and 20....................................................................................12 2. In response to questions 10.............................................................................................12 3. In response to questions 18.............................................................................................12 4. In response to questions 19.............................................................................................13 Appendix 2 – Copy of review confirmation letter to HDC....................................................................14 Appendix 3 – Copy of Millfields appeal decision.................................................................................15 Rusper Neighbourhood Plan - Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Page 2 1. Foreword - Coalescence Independent Examiner Question In the Foreword (fifth paragraph) there is a reference to ‘even small scale development’ leading to ‘the two towns becoming one large urban sprawl’. There is also a statement that ‘further development, especially to the West of Ifield, will be harmful to both the communities and the environment’. Where is the evidence on which these statements are based? Parish Council Response The evidence for the small scale development leading to a coalescence of Horsham and Crawley is based on a study of the maps after the currently permitted developments are complete. This shows that once the final phase of Kilnwood Vale (DC/10/1612) and North Horsham (DC/16/1677) developments are complete and the development of the garage at Faygate (DC/19/0095) and a drive-through take-away along the A264 (DC/19/1913), all of which have initial planning consent, then the distance along the A264 separating the two towns is approximately 1 mile. This is split into two gaps: the one between North Horsham and the new take-away drive through at the Cherry Tree public house location; and the other between Park Road in Faygate and the Kilnwood Vale development. So a small scale development in either of these areas would effectively join the two towns as a ribbon development along the A264. A development to the West of Ifield, especially to the scale proposed by Homes England, would have a significant impact and we do not feel that this is disputed. The question is on how detrimental that impact would be. If the full scale of the 10,000 homes proposed, along with a new dual carriageway, went ahead then the majority of the rural area for the whole eastern half of Rusper Parish would be urbanised as effectively a part of Crawley in much the same way as the Kilnwood Vale development. It is clear from all of our responses from the parish residents that the rural nature of the environment is the most important thing to them, reference the initial questionnaire responses and subsequent consultations. This is a clear indication that it is harmful to the community. This is further supported by the responses of community groups in Ifield that represent the Crawley residents that are most affected. In terms of the environment, all of the areas along Ifield Brook and the River Mole are recognised flood plain and represent important wild-life habitat. Whilst proposals would seek to protect these specific flood plain areas, covering existing open fields and woods with housing, roads and commercial developments will inevitably lead to increased rain water run off, which will further jeopardise areas at risk of and already subject to flooding further downstream along the River Mole. No viable mitigation for wildlife habitat can overcome the overall loss of habitat that building on such a large area of open fields and woods would bring about. 2. Planning Policy Context – Paragraph 3.8 Independent Examiner Question Paragraph 3.8 refers to major allocations being proposed – by whom and in which document? Parish Council Response The major allocations referred to are in North Horsham and in the Ifield and Kilnwood Vale areas, identified as Sites 10, 11, 12 and 13 within our site assessments document. They have all been considered by HDC and already have planning permission Site 10 – North Horsham, relates to HDC SHELAA reference SA296. This has outline approval for 2,750 home approximately 500 of which will fall within the Rusper plan area and work has just commenced on the initial infrastructure for that site. This development is now managed by Legal and Rusper Neighbourhood Plan - Statement in Response to the Initial Comments of the Independent Examiner Page 3 General. Latest planning application reference: DC/16/1677 Site 11 – Kilnwood Vale, relates to HDC SHELAA reference SA289. This will be one of the final phases of the Kilnwood Vale development. This development is managed by Crest Nicholson. Latest planning application reference: DC/10/1612 Site 12 – Rusper Road A, relates to HDC SHELAA reference SA272. This development along the Rusper Road in Ifield is just being completed and people are already living on site. This development is managed by Martin Grant Homes. Latest planning application reference: DC/13/0368 Site 13 – Rusper Road B, relates to HDC SHELAA reference SA468. This development along the Rusper Road in Ifield is well underway and people are already living on site. This development is managed by Bovis Homes. Latest planning application reference: DC/14/2132 These sites are also covered in the latest Horsham District Council SHELAA report https://rusper- np.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/SHELAA_RUSPER_DEC18.pdf and the earlier SHELAA https://www.horsham.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/66309/Rusper.pdf . This information is already listed on our website as part of the evidence base. 3. Planning Policy Context – Paragraph 3.12 Independent Examiner Question Paragraph 3.12 refers to Local Plan consultation in April 2018 and in paragraph 6.8 there is another reference to evidence dated April 2018. Is the Parish Council satisfied that these paragraphs accurately reflect the most up-to-date position, particularly in terms of the availability
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies PDF 1 MB
    Crawley Borough Council Report to Governance Committee 28th November 2017 2018 Review of Parliamentary Constituencies Report of the Head of Legal and Democratic Services: LDS/133 1. Purpose 1.1 This report informs the Committee of the revised proposals of the Boundary Commission for England for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries as they affect Crawley. 2. Recommendations 2.1 That representations be made to the Boundary Commission for England that the Rusper and Colgate ward should be included in Crawley parliamentary constituency. 3. Reasons for the Recommendations 3.1 The residents of Kilnwood Vale will receive significant services from Crawley constituency and would be best represented by the Member of Parliament for Crawley. 4. Background 4.1 In 2016 the Boundary Commission for England (BCE) announced the start of a Review of Parliamentary constituencies. At its meeting held on 14th November 2017 the Governance Committee considered the initial proposals of the Boundary Commission for England (BCE) for a new parliamentary constituency for Crawley as part of the review of constituencies under the provisions of the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Act 2011. 4.2 The new rules involve a reduction in the number of Constituencies in England from 533 to 501, and state that each constituency must have an electorate, at December 2015, no smaller than 71,031 and no bigger than 78,507. 4.3 At present, the boundaries of Crawley Constituency and Crawley Borough are co- terminus. The parliamentary electorate for Crawley on 1st December 2015 was 70,578 and therefore is not big enough to remain co-terminus with the borough boundary under the new rules.
    [Show full text]
  • HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL – LIST of NEW APPS (Parish Order) Data Produced 7Th August 2017
    HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL – LIST OF NEW APPS (Parish Order) Data produced 7th August 2017 Parish: Billingshurst PC Ward: Billingshurst and Shipley Case No: DC/17/1673 Case Officer: Luke Simpson Date Valid: 28 July 2017 Comments by: 1 September 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Householder Agent: Applicant: Mr and Mrs Matthew Odell Proposal: Proposed erection of a single storey domestic stable block with pitched gable roof and storage/office space above. (Revised scheme to that previously approved under application DC/14/2097). Site Address: South Lodge New Road Billingshurst West Sussex RH14 9DT Grid Ref: 510021 126858 Parish: Bramber PC Ward: Bramber, Upper Beeding and Woodmancote Case No: DC/17/1245 Case Officer: Nicola Mason Date Valid: 17 July 2017 Comments by: 15 August 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Minor Dwellings Agent: Mark Folkes Applicant: Mr David King Proposal: Proposed erection of a single two storey dwelling (Amendments to previously approved application DC/16/1088) Site Address: Land To The Rear of Crimond Maudlin Lane Bramber Steyning West Sussex Grid Ref: 517942 110615 Parish: Cowfold PC Ward: Cowfold,Shermanbury and West Grinstead Case No: DC/17/1680 Case Officer: Tamara Dale Date Valid: 28 July 2017 Comments by: 1 September 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Change of Use Agent: Mr Matthew Brockhurst Applicant: Mr K Strange Proposal: Proposed change of use and associated works to convert existing agricultural barn/store into self- contained 1 bedroom accommodation unit
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of a Planning Meeting of Colgate Parish Council Held on 25Th Nov 2020 Remotely. Present Councillors: C. Crosdil, S
    Minutes of a Planning Meeting of Colgate Parish Council held on 25th Nov 2020 remotely. Present Councillors: C. Crosdil, S Garley , S. Davies, S. Marley, J Sired and V. Finnegan Apologies were accepted: R Calvert ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Minutes of the last meeting. None. 2. Declaration of Interests None 3. Members of the public- None 4. Applications. DC/20/2223 Reserved matters application for Phase 6A of the Kilnwood Vale development, comprising 168 dwellings with associated landscaping, play space and parking following approval of outline application DC/17/2481 relating to layout, scale, appearance and landscaping. Land Within Phase 6 Kilnwood Vale Crawley Road Faygate No Comments 5. Decisions Application Number: DC/20/1904 Site: Acorn House 11 Beedingwood Drive Colgate Horsham West Sussex RH12 4TE Description: Surgery to 1 x Beech Decision: Application Permitted Date of Decision: 11/11/2020 Application Number: DC/20/1692 Site: 1 Beedingwood Drive Colgate Horsham West Sussex RH12 4TE Description: Fell 1 x Oak Decision: Application Permitted 1 Date of Decision: 17/11/2020 Application Number: DC/20/1745 Site: Street Record Beedingwood Drive Colgate West Sussex Description: Fell 1 x Pussy Willow and Surgery to 1 x Silver Birch Decision: Application Permitted Date of Decision: 17/11/2020 Application Number: DC/20/1782 Site: 1 Coach House Colgate Lodge Blackhouse Road Colgate Horsham West Sussex RH13 6HS Description: Variation of Condition
    [Show full text]
  • Land West of Crawley, Rusper Site Area: ´ 190 Hectares
    Land West of Crawley, Rusper Site area: ´ 190 hectares The site primarily comprises arable and pasture fields bounded by hedgerows and mature trees together with a golf course. The wider area of study is located north of the A264 from Faygate in the west and extends in an arc north west towards Crawley, Gatwick Airport and the A23. To the east, the site adjoins the neighbourhood of Ifield, in Crawley and Gatwick Airport is to the north. Horsham District Council Local Plan Review 2020 Parkside, Chart Way, Horsham West Sussex RH12 1RL Potential Strategic Allocations Barbara Childs : Director of Place over 800 dwellings Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey map on behalf of HMSO. © Crown copyright and database rights (2020). Reference No : Date : 24 January 2020 Scale : 1:5,000 at A2 Ordnance Survey Licence.100023865 Drawing No : Drawn : Checked : Revisions : Homes England have identified an area of search that sweeps Pros and Cons from Faygate to the west of Crawley. Homes England suggest • If allocated the site would help the Council to meet a significant up to 10,000 homes could be delivered. Within the area of proportion of the Government’s housing requirements and search, land immediately to the West of Ifield is being promoted would provide new facilities and services such as shops and for around 3,000 homes and Land to the West of Kilnwood Vale schools and leisure facilities. Many of these could be delivered (not shown in the map above) is being promoted for around early in the development. 800 homes. These would form part the 10,000 homes if the site • Potential to provide new employment land.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITAL Project Trust
    CAPITAL Project Trust Opening Doors to Mental Wellbeing Information and Resources Handbook To Support You and Your Mental Health during Social Distancing and Self Isolation due to Covid-19 Information gathered from multiple sources including Pathfinder, Local Councils and other Charities. Information is subject to change. CAPITAL Project Trust would like to thank all providers for their support and advice. Compiled by CAPITAL Project Trust, April 2020 1 Contents Page Mental Health Apps 3 - 8 Wellbeing Websites 9 - 10 Support Available - Specific Area 11 - 15 Foodbanks 16 - 17 Domestic Abuse Support 18 - 19 Crisis Support Information 20 Pathfinder Contact Details 21 - 22 2 Wellbeing and Mental Health Apps Compiled by Pathfinder West Sussex https://www.pathfinderwestsussex.org.uk/ Self-Management Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) Free and available for App Store and Play store. • The WRAP is a simple and powerful process for creating the life and wellness you want. • Using the WRAP App, you can develop your WRAP, carry it with you wherever you go and share it with whomever you want. • Based on the WRAP Workbook, the WRAP App walks you through the process of creating your personal WRAP. Use it on your own, with a friend or supporter, or in a WRAP group. Recovery Path - Free to download and available on App Store as well as Play store • For people with addictive behaviour • This app offers many strategies to overcome cravings and supports the user to develop a path to sustained recovery, share progress with others and receive support. MyPlan • MyPlan is a tool to help women with safety decisions, such as abuse in their intimate relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL – LIST of NEW APPS (Parish Order) Data Produced 08/05/17
    HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL – LIST OF NEW APPS (Parish Order) Data produced 08/05/17 Parish: Ashington PC Ward: Chanctonbury Case No: DC/17/0944 Case Officer: Will Jones Date Valid: 27 April 2017 Comments by: 26 May 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Not Required on Return Agent: Mrs Ann Callaghan Applicant: Saxon Weald Proposal: Surgery to 1 x Horse Chestnut Site Address: 6 Woelfs Close London Road Ashington Pulborough West Sussex RH20 3JU Grid Ref: 513216 116217 Parish: Cowfold PC Ward: Cowfold,Shermanbury and West Grinstead Case No: DC/17/0893 Case Officer: Will Jones Date Valid: 24 April 2017 Comments by: 23 May 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Not Required on Return Agent: Mrs Ann Callaghan Applicant: Saxon Weald Proposal: Fell 1 x Cherry Tree (Works to Trees in a Conservation Area) Site Address: Mercers Mead Oakfield Road Cowfold West Sussex Grid Ref: 521431 122432 Parish: Colgate PC Ward: Rusper and Colgate Case No: DC/17/0943 Case Officer: Jason Hawkes Date Valid: 27 April 2017 Comments by: 2 June 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Smallscale Major Other Agent: Sarah Beuden Applicant: c/o Agent Proposal: Development of a green route and attenuation pond to serve Phases 1, 2 and 3, with associated drainage and landscaping Site Address: Kilnwood Vale Crawley Road Faygate West Sussex Grid Ref: 523516 135034 Parish: Denne NC Ward: Horsham Park Case No: DC/17/0807 Case Officer: Will Jones Date Valid: 3 May 2017 Comments by: 28 April 2017 Decision Level: Delegated Decision App Type: Not Required
    [Show full text]
  • Horsham Proposal
    Boundary Review of West Sussex County Council Draft proposals for Horsham: July 2015 Horsham District Proposal: Divisions affected: (a) Billingshurst Loses part of the Parish of Shipley (Polling Districts PN and PQE) (b) Southwater & Nuthurst (rename to Southwater & Shipley) Gains part of the Parish of Shipley (Polling Districts PN and PQE) Loses part of the parish of Nuthurst and the parish of Lower Beeding (Polling districts PA and NM) (c) Warnham & Rusper (rename to Broadbridge) Gains Broadbridge Heath (Polling Districts NGA and NGB) Loses Rusper and Colgate (polling districts PL, NZ, NSA, NSB, NSC, NSD and NJ) (d) Roffey (rename to Horsham East) Gains parts of Roffey South (polling districts NVB and NVC) and part of Forest (polling district NRA) Loses part of Roffey South (polling district NVA) to St Leonard’s Forest Loses 19 houses on Station Road to Horsham Hurst (e) Horsham Riverside Gains Denne (polling districts NN and NO). Loses part of Roffey South (polling districts NVB and NVC) and part of Forest (polling district NRA). Loses part of polling district PJ. (f) Horsham Hurst Gains part (672 electors in April 2015) of PJ Horsham Park 3 (Millais school area) from Riverside Gains 19 houses on Station Road from Roffey. (g) Horsham Tanbridge & Broadbridge Heath – DIVISION REMOVED (i) St Leonard’s Forest – NEW DIVISION to comprise: NVA Roffey S from Roffey, NM Crabtree (Lower Beeding area), PA Mannings Heath from Southwater, NSA, NSB, NSC Faygate 1,2 & 3 , NJ Colgate, NZ Ifield & PL Rusper from Warnham (j) Divisions unchanged: Bramber Castle, Henfield, Holbrook, Pulborough and Storrington. Key Considerations: This proposal has two small divisions in 2015 (Broadbridge and St Leonards Forest) and one over 10% (Storrington).
    [Show full text]
  • Horsham Proposal
    Boundary Review of West Sussex County Council Draft proposals for Horsham: July 2015 Horsham District Proposal: Divisions affected: (a) Billingshurst Farmhouses accessed from Black Gate Lane to move from Billingshurst to Pulborough (29 electors) (b) Southwater & Nuthurst Loses part of the parish of Nuthurst and the parish of Lower Beeding (Polling districts PA and NM) (c) Warnham & Rusper (rename to Broadbridge) Gains Broadbridge Heath (Polling Districts NGA and NGB) Loses Rusper and Colgate (polling districts PL, NZ, NSA, NSB, NSC, NSD and NJ) (d) Roffey (rename to Horsham East) Gains parts of Roffey South (polling districts NVB and NVC) and part of Forest (polling district NRA) Loses part of Roffey South (polling district NVA) to St Leonard’s Forest Loses 19 houses (22 electors) on Station Road to Horsham Hurst (e) Horsham Riverside Gains Denne (polling districts NN and NO). Loses part of Roffey South (polling districts NVB and NVC) and part of Forest (polling district NRA). Loses part of polling district PJ. (f) Horsham Hurst Gains part (672 electors) of PJ Horsham Park 3 (Millais school area) from Riverside Gains 19 houses (22 electors) on Station Road from Roffey. 12 properties on the south side of Depot Road, west of Owers Close transferred from Riverside to Hurst (20 electors). (g) Horsham Tanbridge & Broadbridge Heath – DIVISION REMOVED (i) St Leonard’s Forest – NEW DIVISION to comprise: NVA Roffey S from Roffey, NM Crabtree (Lower Beeding area), PA Mannings Heath from Southwater, NSA, NSB, NSC Faygate 1,2 & 3 , NJ Colgate, NZ Ifield & PL Rusper from Warnham (m) Pulborough To gain farmhouses accessed from Black Gate Lane to move from Billingshurst (29 electors) Divisions unchanged: (j) Bramber Castle, (k) Henfield, (l) Holbrook, and (n) Storrington.
    [Show full text]
  • Land North of Horsham – Parish Liaison Group Notes of a Meeting
    Land north of Horsham – Parish Liaison Group Notes of a meeting with Liberty Property Trust held on Friday 8th September 2017 at 12pm at Roffey Millennium Hall. Purpose of the meeting:- To initiate discussions following the approval of planning application DC/16/1677 (subject to agreement of Section 106 contributions and conditions) for development north of Horsham. The application includes housing (up to 2,750 dwellings), a business park (up to 46,450 m2), retail, community centre, leisure facilities, education facilities, public open space, landscaping and related infrastructure and has reserved matters except for access. In attendance :- Liberty Property Trust (LPT) – Derek Lloyd, Katie Ireland North Horsham Parish Council - Cllr Alan Britten, Cllr Roland Knight, Richard Millington, Cllr Ray Turner, Cllr Ian Wassell, Cllr Sally Wilton. Horsham District Council (HDC) – Trevor Beadle Resident – Laurie Holt St. Mark’s Church – Rachel Stoffel, Mike Nelson Horsham Cycling Forum (HCF) – Ruth Fletcher, Thea Bredie-Turnbull Notes – Pauline Whitehead Cllr Alan Britten chaired the meeting. 1. Welcome and apologies Cllr Britten invited all present to introduce themselves. Apologies were given by Cllr D Searle. 2. Initiation of discussion Development and buildings LPT reported that discussion between the legal teams at LPT and HDC regarding the complex, legal aspects of Section 106 and planning conditions associated with the application are still in progress. At the same time LPT is working to progress how the development will be phased and working through the conditions and strategies associated with the application for compliance with the necessary, appropriate policies. Work is being progressed to make differences in terminology consistent.
    [Show full text]
  • Kilnwood Vale Crawley Road Faygate West Sussex WARD: Rusper and Colgate
    PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Planning Committee North BY: Head of Development DATE: 6 February 2018 Outline planning application for the development of approximately 227 dwellings (between 204 and 250 dwellings) with the construction of a new DEVELOPMENT: access from Calvert Link, a pumping station and associated amenity space (all matters reserved except for access). SITE: Land To The West of Phase 1 Kilnwood Vale Crawley Road Faygate West Sussex WARD: Rusper and Colgate APPLICATION: DC/17/2481 Name: Crest Nicholson Operations Limited APPLICANT: Address: c/o Savills, 2 Charlotte Place, Southampton REASON FOR INCLUSION ON THE AGENDA: More than eight representations received which are contrary to the officer recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: That planning permission be delegated for approval to the Development Manager: - subject to completion of a legal agreement and appropriate conditions. The legal agreement will secure affordable housing provision (40%), open space provision and contributions for education, libraries, fire and rescue services, health improvements, community and sports facilities. - subject to the submission of satisfactory evidence to address the late objection received from Wealden District Council regarding the impact on the Ashdown Forest Special Area of Conservation and subject no objection to the evidence from Natural England. 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 1.1 To consider the planning application. DESCRIPTION OF THE APPLICATION 1.2 Outline planning permission is sought for the development of approximately 227 dwellings on ‘Reserve Land’ that forms part of the West of Bewbush (West of Crawley) strategic development site. This equates to between 204 and up to 250 dwellings. The proposal includes the construction of a new access from Calvert Link, a pumping station and associated amenity space.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in Crawley
    CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE - 5 January 2015 REPORT NO: PES/150 B ITEM REF NO LOCATION RECOMMEND 001 CR/2014/0644/FUL 3 RICHMOND COURT, SOUTHGATE, PERMIT CRAWLEY 002 CR/2014/0669/FUL UNITS 20/21, GATWICK PERMIT INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION CENTRE, COBHAM WAY, NORTHGATE, CRAWLEY 003 CR/2014/0671/OUT WILTSHIRES FLORIST, BALCOMBE REFUSE ROAD, POUND HILL, CRAWLEY 004 CR/2014/0732/FUL CGG SERVICES (UK) LTD, PERMIT CROMPTON WAY, NORTHGATE, CRAWLEY 005 CR/2014/0744/FUL BROADFIELD BARTON PARADE, PERMIT BROADFIELD, CRAWLEY 006 CR/2014/0751/FUL CRAWLEY YOUTH CENTRE, PERMIT LONGMERE ROAD, WEST GREEN, CRAWLEY 007 CR/2014/0766/P24 LAND AT CORNER OF HYDE DRIVE NO AND DOBBINS PLACE, IFIELD, OBJECTION CRAWLEY 008 CR/2014/0780/CON LAND EAST OF EMMANUEL OBJECTION COTTAGE, RUSPER ROAD, IFIELD, CRAWLEY CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE - 5 January 2015 REPORT NO: PES/150 ITEM NO: 001 REFERENCE NO: CR/2014/0644/FUL LOCATION: 3 RICHMOND COURT, SOUTHGATE, CRAWLEY PROPOSAL: EXTENSION TO FRONT PORCH AND EXISTING GARAGE, SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION, FIRST FLOOR SIDE EXTENSION ABOVE EXISTING GARAGE AND UTILITY ROOM AND GARAGE CONVERSION INTO A LOUNGE/PLAYROOM (AMENDED DESCRIPTION) TARGET DECISION DATE: 14 November 2014 CASE OFFICER: Ms E. Wachiuri APPLICANTS NAME: Mr Aaron Dorley AGENTS NAME: Blackstone Architects PLANS & DRAWINGS CONSIDERED: 135-002 Existing Ground & First Floor Plans, 135-003 Existing Front, Side & Rear Extensions, 135-011 Proposed Ground & First Floor Plans, 135-012 Proposed Front, Side & Rear Extensions,
    [Show full text]
  • Invoice Crawley Number: 14095 West Sussex Date: 19Th Feb '20 RH10 5ER Due By: 11Th Mar '20 United Kingdom Account: WOOD01 Purchase Order
    SSALC Limited Sackville House Brooks Close Lewes VAT Number: 167413406 East Sussex,BN7 2FZ T: 01273 830 200 United Kingdom E: fi[email protected] Woodmancote Parish Council 48 Titmus Drive Invoice Crawley Number: 14095 West Sussex Date: 19th Feb '20 RH10 5ER Due By: 11th Mar '20 United Kingdom Account: WOOD01 Purchase Order: Qty Descrip on Rate Total VAT 1 Chairmanship, Governance & Mee ngs Training ‐ 27th Feb 90.00 90.00 18.00 2020 Natwest. Sort Code: 60‐13‐09 Account Number: 42329833 Net: £90.00 Cheques should be made payable to SSALC Limited. VAT @ 20%: £18.00 Company Registra on: 08512101 TOTAL: £108.00 1st March, 2020. To: Horsham District Council Re: Planning – Residents against Mayfield Proposals. On 23rd January 2020 I had a meeting with Peter Freeman, Chairman of Mayfield and Debbie Aplin, MD of Mayfield. My aim with this meeting, following on from my letter to them last year, was to find out what is really going on. During this meeting, Peter and Debbie made many ludicrous statements with no relation whatsoever to reality, and I brought reality to their attention on each occasion. One point Peter agreed with me; {if this nightmare is not quoshed)for the next fifteen to twenty years our already overloaded roads will be full of builders lorries, cement trucks, equipment and supplies and product lorries – there will be no let up. They talked of ‘creating a community’ and I was able to explain we already have a wonderful close community in this area based on everyone working and socialising together, those who commute come together with us in social hours in our wonderful environment.
    [Show full text]