DOCSLIB.ORG

Worksheet Copy Spurgeon's Paper

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Worksheet Copy Spurgeon's Paper An Inclusive Science and Faith Message for the Media Dr. Hank D. Voss, [email protected] Taylor University, Upland, IN (Please email or talk with me during conference Cell 765 618 3813) Note: Taylor University and ASA not responsible for content. American Scientific Affiliation (ASA) conference, July 21, 2012, San Diego, CA The Heavens Declare the Glory of God! Psalm 19:1 The Greatest Question: Origins…Where did we / everything come from??? • Problem and Background • A Converging Baseline Creation (BC) Message Using Gen. 1 • Exo-planets and early earth without “form and void” • First Day 1 Light and Giant Impact • Days 0-6 and Mainstream Science • Huge Media/Society Implications Voss, ASA, 8/21/2012 2 Origins Problem (Secular) Random Evolution (RE) 25% 25% Theistic Evolution (TE) Old Earth Creation (OE) 25% 25% Young Earth Creation (YE) General Adult Belief Origins Poll surprising considering strong promotion of RE (>Billions $/yr.) by: RE • Media (video, radio, news, …) TE • Government Science and Education 48% • Professional Societies (bylaws, journals) OE • Public Universities YE • K-12 Education • Museums, Zoos, National Parks A Large Market for Connecting Mainstream Science to Bible/Belief? 3 “Limitations of Science” Mainstream Speculations: Pseudoscience Attempts to substitute “God” (Science as a Religion) • A Quantum Fluctuation creates the Universe • Multiverses to explain our fine-tuned Universe • Godless Grand Unified Theory of Everything (GUT) • Abiogenesis of Life in Galaxy (Drake Equation) • The Higgs Boson: The “God Particle” (SM particle) • And more presented in our classes and textbooks fanpop.com Good Science follows the Data (Points to a God! or?) • The Universe has a young 13.7B beginning (was repulsive to secular scientist) • The Universe will expand forever without contraction (Only one beginning) • Our universe is specially crafted/fine tuned (Anthropic Principle: Multiverse?) • The Earth-moon formed with a highly improbable collision (Catastrophe) 4 1 Cor. 13:12 For now we see through The Plumb line a glass darkly but then face to of Truth face. For now I know in part... Interpretation Interpretation of science of the Bible False ideas, False Interpretations Steady State, (hermeneutics), Cults, Eternal cosmos, Geocentric, thunder, Uniformity (No medicine/ surgery, Y2K, Catastrophes: relativity, time not Continental Drift, variable, Size of Universe, Asteroid Impacts ), Age of Universe, Gen 1?, Moon Origin, All Hominids, …?? Mechanistic, No Dimensions/other Christian Worldview encouraged search realms, …?? for order in Science Renaissance 5 RE, TE, OE, and YE Reference (see ASA web site for definitions) Interpretation Age Other Genesis 1/Secular Associations Key Advocates Young Earth Creation YE <10 K Schroeder Time, Time Acceleration, Appearance of Age ICR, AIG, CRS Literal Genesis 1 Physical Creation Old Earth Creation OE 13.7 B Progressive Creation, Day-Age, Gap theory, ID RTB, ASA, CRC Literal Genesis 1 Physical Creation Theistic Evolution TE 13.7 B Framework, Cosmic Temple, Poetic, Myth, ID ASA, Bio-Logos, CRC Non literal Genesis 1 Physical Creation, Functional Random Evolution RE 13.7 B Exogenesis, Panspermia, Extraterrestrial Implant Secular, Academic, SETI (Secular) • Is it not better if Genesis 1 describes BOTH a literal sequence of physical creation events and a more abstract layer of spiritual, poetic, and ancient cultural meaning? • Genesis 1 sets the foundation for Biblical Interpretation and shows God’s attributes (omniscience, omnipotence , omnipresence, and omnibenevolent). In addition, our fundamental cultural Worldview is shaped by the reality of God and scripture. Genesis 1 is stronger if it is Both literally and functionally correct (Inspiration). • Baseline Creation (BC) Message Objectives: • To humbly understand truth with harmony. Eph. 4:25, “Speak truth each one of you with his neighbor”, Ps. 19:1-4 “The Heavens declare the Glory of God” • Motivate Christian students to pursue geoscience and STEM Fields • Motivate the public to understand that mainstream scientific data can strongly underpin Creation • For Media Impact need a unified cohesive theme (Exciting Storyline Script)6 25 parallels between Genesis 1 “Storyline” and Mainstream Science Rev. Main (Gy BP) Mainstream Science Genesis/Bible Events Bible/Old Commentary Image 8/4/12 Ref Events Other realms or dimensions, Gen 1:1,2 Gen 1:1 In the beginning God (Before time) Other Dimensions, 1 One Creator God before Tim 1:9, Tts created the heavens and earth. Numerous universes ("bubbles"), The cosmos (transcendent) 1:2, 1 Cr 2:7 2 Tim 1:9 This grace .... before the Multiverse beginning of time Ex nihilo beginning of universe (13.7B) Big Bang, Beginning out of Gen 1:1 Nahmanides Commentary, 1250 2 made out of nothing (Novel AD: The initial creation produced an nothing, Ancient view) Heb 11:3 entity so thin it had no substance Singularity, Quantum Fluctuation, ? Beginning of Space, Time, to it. It was the only physical General Relativity, "Big Bang" (Note that Gen 1:1,2 Pet creation ever to occur and was all Bang was not chaotic but a highly 3 Forces, (Nahmanides 3:5, Heb 11:3 concentrated within the speck of crafted and low entropy controlled Commentary, NC) space that was the entire universe expansion) Beginning of Mass and Gen 1:1, Heb just following its creation. As the 4 universe expanded from the size of E=mc^2, General Relativity, Big Bang, Energy, (NC) 11:3 the initial miniscule space, the Laws of Physics: Instant Gen 1:1, Col 5 primordial substanceless substance Unknown? First Cause? Creation 1:16 changed into matter as we know it. Initial Conditions, Time starts with the appearance of Gen 1:1, Col Unknown? Where did the information 6 Information, Low Entropy, matter. 1:16 Heb 11: 3 What is seen was not come from? controlled expansion made out of what was visible. ZAP! Instant creation, No Col 1:16 For by him all things were Inflation to explain CBR and flatness, 7 universe to relatively large Gen 1:1 created: ... visible and invisible Instant increase of size of universe by 60 universe orders of magnitude Expansion, stretched out like Ps 104:2, Jer. Isa 40:22, 42:5,45:12 , He stretches out 8 10:12, 51:15, the heavens like a canopy, and spreads Hubble Law plus vacuum acceleration a tent Zech. 12:1 them out like a tent to live in. Universe CreationUnfoldingand Gen 1:2 And the earth was without (4.57B) Exo-planets, Chaos, Wasteland 9 Earth without form, void Gen 1:2 form, and void. probability Water on face of earth, The Gen 1:2 And the Spirit of God was Spirit of God located on the hovering over the waters. 2 Pet 3:5 "Day 0" Creation and Unfolding of Cosmos "Day Unfolding Creationand 0" Watery and Ocean Planets (Super 10 Surface of Earth gives a Gen 1: 2 the heavens existed and the earth Earths) viewing reference point for was formed out of water and by understanding Creation Days water. 11 Darkness on face of earth Gen 1:2, Job Gen 1:2 And darkness was upon the Exoplanet thick first atmosphere-clouds, Earth 38:9 face of the deep. Job 38:9 "when I Ocean Hadean Period; H2, He, H2O, CO2, N2, made the clouds its garment and Voss, ASA, 8/21/2012 Planet NH3, CH4, CL, S, About 100+ atm. like7 wrapped it in thick darkness" Venus with clouds 25 parallels between Genesis 1 “Storyline” and Mainstream Science Continued (4.5 B) Giant Impact, Earth Brighter than Gen 1:3 And God said, "Let there be 12 Day 1 First Light on earth Gen 1: 3 the Sun for few days, earth structure light," and there was light. reborn, moon created with stability Hadean Day 1 Day Gen 1:4,5 and he separated the light from the darkness. God called the Earth Spin Rate increased rapidly to 5hrs 13 Day 1 Beginning of days Gen 1:4,5 light "day," and the darkness he giving the First Day, called "night." LIGHT Day 1 First evening and Gen 1:5 And there was evening, and 1st Evening (thick darkness) to morning 14 Gen 1:5 morning there was morning - the first day. with new day/night periods 4.5-3.8 B Early icy asteroid impacts, Late 15 Day 2 Atmosphere Water Gen 1:6 2 Peter 3:5 .....the earth was formed out of water and by water, early bombardment, lunar cataclysm Day 2 Atmospheric balance, Gen 1:6-8 And God said, "Let there (3.8B) New Atmosphere with Water, Archean 16 Water Cycle, Clouds Above Gen 1:6 be an expanse between the H2O Habitable Zone established for life, (translucent) waters to separate water from Clouds, First life, Extremophiles water." Day 2 Livable Atmosphere (3.2 B), Cyanobacteria for Atmosphere 17 Gen 1:8 So God made the expanse and Water Day 2 Day Water created separated the water under the O2 generation, Stromatolites, expanse from the water above it. 18 Day 2 Global Ocean Gen 1:7 (1.8 B) Convection causes uplift, one Gen 1:9 And God said, "Let the water Proterozoic 19 Day 3 one land mass Gen 1:9,10 under the sky be gathered to one land mass Colombia/Rodina place, and let dry ground appear." Supercontinents, Plate Tectonics Gen 1:11 Then God said, "Let the land produce vegetation: seed bearing (1B) Eukaryotes, Protista, Green Algae, 20 Day 3 plants on land Gen 1:11,12 plants and trees on the land that bear Plants on Land begin fruit with seed in it" Land/Plants Day 3 Day Land/Plants Gen 1:16 God made two great lights - (530M) CO2 sequestered, Transparent Paleozoic Day 4 Observe sun, moon, the greater light to govern the day 21 Gen 1:14-18 atmosphere, Cambrian Explosion, Day 4 Day stars and the lesser light to govern the night.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ghost Imaging of Space Objects
    Ghost Imaging of Space Objects Dmitry V. Strekalov, Baris I. Erkmen, Igor Kulikov, and Nan Yu Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109-8099 USA NIAC Final Report September 2014 Contents I. The proposed research 1 A. Origins and motivation of this research 1 B. Proposed approach in a nutshell 3 C. Proposed approach in the context of modern astronomy 7 D. Perceived benefits and perspectives 12 II. Phase I goals and accomplishments 18 A. Introducing the theoretical model 19 B. A Gaussian absorber 28 C. Unbalanced arms configuration 32 D. Phase I summary 34 III. Phase II goals and accomplishments 37 A. Advanced theoretical analysis 38 B. On observability of a shadow gradient 47 C. Signal-to-noise ratio 49 D. From detection to imaging 59 E. Experimental demonstration 72 F. On observation of phase objects 86 IV. Dissemination and outreach 90 V. Conclusion 92 References 95 1 I. THE PROPOSED RESEARCH The NIAC Ghost Imaging of Space Objects research program has been carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech. The program consisted of Phase I (October 2011 to September 2012) and Phase II (October 2012 to September 2014). The research team consisted of Drs. Dmitry Strekalov (PI), Baris Erkmen, Igor Kulikov and Nan Yu. The team members acknowledge stimulating discussions with Drs. Leonidas Moustakas, Andrew Shapiro-Scharlotta, Victor Vilnrotter, Michael Werner and Paul Goldsmith of JPL; Maria Chekhova and Timur Iskhakov of Max Plank Institute for Physics of Light, Erlangen; Paul Nu˜nez of Coll`ege de France & Observatoire de la Cˆote d’Azur; and technical support from Victor White and Pierre Echternach of JPL.
    [Show full text]
  • Cervantes.Es
    NameExoWorlds contest organized by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) to name recently discovered exoplanets and their host stars (http://www.nameexoworlds.iau.org) www.estrellacervantes.es Proposal presented by the Planetario de Pamplona (Spain) and supported by the Spanish Astronomical Society (SEA) and the Instituto Cervantes to name the star mu Arae and its four exoplanets with the name of Cervantes and those of the main characters of the novel “The Ingenious Gentleman Don Quixote de la Mancha” RATIONALE: Somewhere in the Ara constellation, around a star without a proper name, only known by the letter µ, four planets trace their paths. Around an author of universal fame, also his four main characters revolve. We propose to elevate Cervantes to the status of a galactic Apolo, lending his name to the system's central star, while Don Quijote (Quixote), Rocinante, Sancho and Dulcinea are justly transfigured into his planetary escort. Quijote (mu Arae b), the leading character, in a somewhat eccentric orbit, befitting to his character, and beside his faithful companion Rocinante (mu Arae d) in the middle of the scene. Good Sancho (mu Arae e), the ingenious squire, moving slowly through the outer insulae of the system. The enchanted Dulcinea (mu Arae c), so difficult for Don Quijote to contemplate in her real shape, close to the heart of the writer. The importance of Miguel de Cervantes in the universal culture can hardly be overestimated. His major work, Don Quijote, considered the first modern novel of world literature and one of the most influential book in the entire literary canon, has many times been regarded as the best work of fiction ever written.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/ Astero2007.Pdf) and by Aerts Et Al (2010)
    This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights and duplication or sale of all or part is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for research, private study, criticism/review or educational purposes. Electronic or print copies are for your own personal, non- commercial use and shall not be passed to any other individual. No quotation may be published without proper acknowledgement. For any other use, or to quote extensively from the work, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder/s. i Fundamental Properties of Solar-Type Eclipsing Binary Stars, and Kinematic Biases of Exoplanet Host Stars Richard J. Hutcheon Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Research Institute: School of Environmental and Physical Sciences and Applied Mathematics. University of Keele June 2015 ii iii Abstract This thesis is in three parts: 1) a kinematical study of exoplanet host stars, 2) a study of the detached eclipsing binary V1094 Tau and 3) and observations of other eclipsing binaries. Part I investigates kinematical biases between two methods of detecting exoplanets; the ground based transit and radial velocity methods. Distances of the host stars from each method lie in almost non-overlapping groups. Samples of host stars from each group are selected. They are compared by means of matching comparison samples of stars not known to have exoplanets. The detection methods are found to introduce a negligible bias into the metallicities of the host stars but the ground based transit method introduces a median age bias of about -2 Gyr.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithium Abundances in Exoplanet-Host Stars: Modelling
    A&A 494, 663–668 (2009) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078928 & c ESO 2009 Astrophysics Lithium abundances in exoplanet-host stars: modelling M. Castro1, S. Vauclair2,O.Richard3, and N. C. Santos4 1 Centro de Astronomia e Astrofísica da Universidade de Lisboa, Observatório Astronómico de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-018 Lisboa, Portugal 2 Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Toulouse et Tarbes – UMR 5572 – Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III – CNRS, 14 Av. E. Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France 3 Université Montpellier II – GRAAL, CNRS – UMR 5024, place Eugéne Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France 4 Centro de Astrofísica da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] Received 26 October 2007 / Accepted 14 November 2008 ABSTRACT Aims. Exoplanet host stars (EHS) are known to present superficial chemical abundances different from those of stars without any detected planet (NEHS). EHS are, on average, overmetallic compared to the Sun. The observations also show that, for cool stars, lithium is more depleted in EHS than in NEHS. The aim of this paper is to obtain constraints on possible models able to explain this difference, in the framework of overmetallic models compared to models with solar abundances. Methods. We have computed main sequence stellar models with various masses and metallicities. The results show different behaviour for the lithium destruction according to these parameters. We compare these results to the spectroscopic observations of lithium. Results. Our models show that the observed lithium differences between EHS and NEHS are not directly due to the overmetallicity of the EHS: some extra mixing is needed below the convective zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 20 Lab Manual Table of Contents Lab 1: Velocity Gedanken Lab
    Physics 20 Lab Manual Table of Contents Lab 1: Velocity Gedanken Lab...................................................................................................................3 Lab 2: Equilibrium of Forces Lab..............................................................................................................5 Lab 3: Horizontal Projectile Motion Lab...................................................................................................7 Lab 4: Buoyancy of a Wooden Block........................................................................................................8 Lab 5: Coefficient of Friction....................................................................................................................9 Lab 6: Elevator Lab..................................................................................................................................10 Lab 8: Exoplanet Gedanken.....................................................................................................................11 Lab 9: Hooke's Law.................................................................................................................................13 Lab 10: Measuring Gravity with a Pendulum..........................................................................................14 Lab 11: Speed of Sound...........................................................................................................................15 Appendix A: Laboratory Report Format..................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Sticks and Stones
    Sticks and Stones Tom Jolly Chapter 1 Captain Jennifer Kelley still called it a burial even though the body was just getting ejected into space. Some of the crew had collected a variety of flowers from the plants growing everywhere on the Beagle-4 and placed them on Mary Cott’s chest before they wrapped her in a vented bag. There was no torpedo tube or fancy coffin involved. They just took the corpse to an airlock, manhandled it through in zero g and awkwardly pushed it out. Chief Scientist Anita Blackthorn heard one of the techs, Bob Lowenstein, talking about it earlier. “We’re just polluting space. You think just tossing out one body won’t make any difference, but it’s like beer cans. After a hun - dred years, you can’t walk down a road without stepping on a few.” One of his friends laughed. Anita tried to ignore them and thought about this latest suicide, the corpse drifting slowly away from the ship, and the idea that she might be spending the rest of her life confined to an exploratory vessel with the likes of Bob. Mary Cott might have made the better choice, but now they were down by one biotech-engineer-cook, and Earth wasn’t about to provide them with another. What Bob said wasn’t true, anyway; they were coasting along at near light speed. When the body drifted outside their radiation shielding, interstellar gas, even as tenuous as it was, would start eating away at the corpse, turning it into a tiny gam - ma-ray source.
    [Show full text]
  • The COLOUR of CREATION Observing and Astrophotography Targets “At a Glance” Guide
    The COLOUR of CREATION observing and astrophotography targets “at a glance” guide. (Naked eye, binoculars, small and “monster” scopes) Dear fellow amateur astronomer. Please note - this is a work in progress – compiled from several sources - and undoubtedly WILL contain inaccuracies. It would therefor be HIGHLY appreciated if readers would be so kind as to forward ANY corrections and/ or additions (as the document is still obviously incomplete) to: [email protected]. The document will be updated/ revised/ expanded* on a regular basis, replacing the existing document on the ASSA Pretoria website, as well as on the website: coloursofcreation.co.za . This is by no means intended to be a complete nor an exhaustive listing, but rather an “at a glance guide” (2nd column), that will hopefully assist in choosing or eliminating certain objects in a specific constellation for further research, to determine suitability for observation or astrophotography. There is NO copy right - download at will. Warm regards. JohanM. *Edition 1: June 2016 (“Pre-Karoo Star Party version”). “To me, one of the wonders and lures of astronomy is observing a galaxy… realizing you are detecting ancient photons, emitted by billions of stars, reduced to a magnitude below naked eye detection…lying at a distance beyond comprehension...” ASSA 100. (Auke Slotegraaf). Messier objects. Apparent size: degrees, arc minutes, arc seconds. Interesting info. AKA’s. Emphasis, correction. Coordinates, location. Stars, star groups, etc. Variable stars. Double stars. (Only a small number included. “Colourful Ds. descriptions” taken from the book by Sissy Haas). Carbon star. C Asterisma. (Including many “Streicher” objects, taken from Asterism.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Photometry of Recently Discovered Hot Jupiters Sean Peter Mccloat
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2017 Transit Photometry Of Recently Discovered Hot Jupiters Sean Peter Mccloat Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Mccloat, Sean Peter, "Transit Photometry Of Recently Discovered Hot Jupiters" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 2282. https://commons.und.edu/theses/2282 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRANSIT PHOTOMETRY OF RECENTLY DISCOVERED HOT JUPITERS by Sean Peter McCloat Bachelor of Arts, SUNY Geneseo, 2013 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota December 2017 Copyright 2017 Sean Peter McCloat ii iii PERMISSION Title Transit Photometry of Recently Discovered Hot Jupiters Department Space Studies Degree Master of Science In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the Chairperson of the department of the dean of the School of Graduate Studies. It is understood that any copying or publication or other use of this thesis or part thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • G-Type Main-Sequence Star
    G-type main-sequence star A G-type main-sequence star (Spectral type: G-V), often (and imprecisely) called a yellow dwarf, or G dwarf star, is a main-sequence star (luminosity class V) of spectral type G. Such a star has about 0.84 to 1.15 solar masses and surface temperature of between 5,300 and 6,000 K.[2], Tables VII, VIII. Like other main-sequence stars, a G-type main-sequence star is converting the element hydrogen to helium in its core by means of nuclear fusion.[3] The Sun, the star to which the Earth is gravitationally bound in the Solar System and the object with the largest apparent magnitude, is an example of a G-type main-sequence star (G2V type). Each second, the Sun fuses approximately 600 million tons of hydrogen to helium, converting about 4 million tons of matter to energy.[4][5] Besides the Sun, other well-known examples of G-type main-sequence stars [6][7][8] include Alpha Centauri A, Tau Ceti, and 51 Pegasi. The Sun, a typical example of a G- type main-sequence star. The term yellow dwarf is a misnomer, because G-type stars actually range in color from white, for more luminous types like the Sun, to only very slightly yellow for the less massive Properties of typical G-type main-sequence stars[1] [9] and luminous G-type main-sequence stars. The Sun Surface Effective Color Spectral Mass (M ) gravity temperature index is in fact white, and its spectrum peaks in blue and type ☉ (log g) (K) (B − V) green light, but it can often appear yellow, orange or red through Earth's atmosphere due to atmospheric G0V 1.15 4.32 5,980 0.583 Rayleigh scattering, especially at sunrise and G1V 1.10 4.34 5,900 0.608 [10][11][12] sunset.
    [Show full text]
  • Occulting Ozone Observatory (O3 ) a Briefing to the NAS EOS-1 Panel
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Occulting Ozone Observatory (O3) a briefing to the NAS EOS-1 Panel Doug Lisman, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Stuart Shaklan, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Edward Schwieterman, University of California Riverside November 20, 2019 This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. © 2019 1 Introduction ExoPlanet Exploration Program • O3 is a small starshade mission with focused science objectives that: – Images previously undetectable planets, including rocky HZ planets and, after multiple observations, constrains their orbit and size to inform planetary system diversity and exozodi levels – Detects the likely presence (not abundance) of O3 at rocky planets, as a robust proxy for O2, although Venus has other NUV absorbers and to confirm a biologic origin requires a follow-on mission – Detects the likely presence (not slope) of Rayleigh scattering at larger gas planets • Prominent low-wavelength spectral features yield smaller telescopes and starshades – The mission detailed here operates a 16-m starshade at 16-Mm from a shared and co-launched 1-m telescope (notionally CASTOR, a CSA study mission) with excellent retarget agility and low ∆V – The exact telescope remains flexible, with separate funding for diverse science desired, and the APC paper presents dedicated 60-cm and shared 1.5-m cases
    [Show full text]
  • Extrasolar Planets: Past, Present, and Future by ALAN P
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89784-6 - A Decade of Extrasolar Planets around Normal Stars Edited by Mario Livio, Kailash Sahu and Jeff Valenti Excerpt More information Extrasolar planets: Past, present, and future By ALAN P. BOSS Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution, Washington, DC 20015, USA Human beings have long thought that planetary systemssimilar to our own should exist around stars other than the Sun. However, the astronomical search for planets outside our Solar System has had a dismal history of decades of discoveries that were announced, but could not be confirmed. All that changed in 1995, when we entered the era of the discovery of extrasolar planetary systems orbiting main-sequence stars. To date, well over 130 planets have been found outside our Solar System, ranging from the fairly familiar to the weirdly unexpected. Nearly all of the new planets discovered to date appear to be gas giant planets similar to our Jupiter and Saturn, though with very different orbits about their host stars. In the last year, three planets with much lower masses have been found, similar to those of Uranus and Neptune, but it is not yet clear if they are also ice giant planets, or perhaps rock giant planets, i.e., super-Earths. The long-term goal is to discover and characterize nearby Earth-like, habitable planets. A visionary array of space-based telescopes has been planned that will carry out this incredible search over the next several decades. 1. Introduction Natural philosophers had hypothesized centuries ago that other planetary systems orbited the many stars in the night sky, that the Solar System was not unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Secular Dynamics of Coplanar, Non-Resonant Planetary System Under the General Relativity and Quadrupole Moment Perturbations
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–17 (2008) Printed 22 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Secular dynamics of coplanar, non-resonant planetary system under the general relativity and quadrupole moment perturbations Cezary Migaszewski1? and Krzysztof Gozdziewski´ 1?† 1Torun´ Centre for Astronomy, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Gagarin Str. 11, 87-100 Torun,´ Poland Accepted 2008 September 20. Received 2008 September 19; in original form 2008 April 14 ABSTRACT We construct a secular theory of a coplanar system of N-planets not involved in strong mean motion resonances, and which are far from collision zones. Besides the point-to-point New- tonian mutual interactions, we consider the general relativity corrections to the gravitational potential of the star and the innermost planet, and also a modification of this potential by the quadrupole moment and tidal distortion of the star. We focus on hierarchical planetary systems. After averaging the model Hamiltonian with a simple algorithm making use of very basic properties of the Keplerian motion, we obtain analytical secular theory of the high order in the semi-major axes ratio. A great precision of the analytic approximation is demonstrated with the numerical integrations of the equations of motion. A survey regarding model parame- ters (the masses, semi-major axes, spin rate of the star) reveals a rich and non-trivial dynamics of the secular system. Our study is focused on its equilibria. Such solutions predicted by the classic secular theory, which correspond to aligned (mode I) or anti-aligned (mode II) apsides, may be strongly affected by the gravitational corrections. The so called true secular resonance, which is a new feature of the classic two-planet problem discovered by Michtchenko & Mal- hotra (2004), may appear in other, different regions of the phase space of the generalized model.
    [Show full text]