Freeholders Benefit As Court Upholds Trust Decision

THE TRUST

P u b l i s h e d b y t h e H a m p s t e a d G a r d e n S u b u r b T r u s t L i m i t e d issue No. 10 September 2012

Freeholders benefit as Court upholds Trust decision

The Management Charge for the The Court ordered that the owner of The Court held that the Trust was financial year 2011/2012 has been 25 Ingram Avenue must pay the Trust’s acting in the public interest. The held steady at the same level as costs in defending, over a period of decision sets an important precedent the previous year – and there is a five years, a refusal of Trust consent for the future of the Scheme of further benefit for freeholders. for an extension. The Trust is in turn Management – and is doubly good passing the £140,000, recovered in news for charge payers. In August last year freeholders March 2012, back to charge payers. received a bill for £127. However, this THE GAZETTE AT A GLANCE year, owners of property that became The Court of Appeal ruled in freehold before 5 April 2008 will receive November 2011 that the Trust had Trust Decision Upheld...... 1 a bill for only £85 – thanks largely to been right to refuse consent for an Suburb Trees...... 2 judges in the Court of Appeal. extension that would have encroached Hampstead Heritage Trail...... 3 on the space between houses, Education...... 5 The Hampstead contravened the Design Guidance and Garden Suburb Trust set an undesirable precedent across Trust Committees...... 6 Annual General the Suburb. The Scheme of Management Charge....8 Meeting What’s happening here? See page 4 to find out. 7.30pm for 8pm start Wednesday 12th September Henrietta Barnett School, Central Square The meeting is open to all residents, but to be eligible to vote you must be a full Member of the Trust. If you are unsure if you are already a Member of the Trust please check with the Trust office. Contact details and information on how to join the Trust are on the back page of this Gazette. Members and other residents are warmly invited to join the Trust Council Members and staff for refreshments and conversation from 7.30pm - 8pm.

ALL WELCOME. REFRESHMENTS The majestic trees The four main objectives of the of the Suburb survey are: 1) Protection of the environment – if we do not know what is there, we The number, quality and variety 2010 Character Appraisal, to are in a less good position to defend of trees on the Suburb are one of undertake detailed tree surveys and to trees against threats of any kind. its most distinguishing features. consider the appropriateness of Tree 2) Planning for the future – Preservation Orders. Trees add to the beauty of the The results of the survey will landscape, they complement the The objectives of the tree survey are provide an objective base from architecture, bring ecological benefits to establish the species, condition and which to plan for the conservation including the provision of wildlife exact location of trees in the Suburb and future development of trees in habitats, soften the character of which: the Suburb landscape. streets and open spaces, and add • Are the subject of Tree Preservation 3) Developing policies in consultation greatly to the pleasure of living on the Orders (TPOs); with residents – to work with the Suburb. In short, they are one of the widest possible group of residents glories of Hampstead Garden Suburb, • Appear on Raymond Unwin’s in this survey and in consultation and yet, there is no up to date record original map of the Suburb as having about criteria for future decisions of the trees on the Suburb. been retained from the pre-existing which may arise from it. field landscape prior to development; The Trust therefore proposes, with 4) The effective management of the • Make a significant contribution the support of the Residents estate – the survey will provide the to the character and landscape of the Association and the London Borough Trust and Barnet with up to date Suburb, and to recommend where of Barnet, to act on the information to inform planning and necessary that a TPO be applied. recommendation arising from the estate management. Oak tree at Lucas Crescent, Willifield Way

2 ‘Northern Heights Partnership’ launches Hampstead Heritage Trail

The Trust, the Highgate Society, the Heath & Hampstead Society, and the Hornsey Historical Society joined forces this year for the first time, to create the ‘Hampstead Heritage Trail’.

A new 15 mile self-guided sectional walking tour from Camden Town to Alexandra Palace runs through 5 booklets, covering 500 points of interest. The trail runs through Camden Town, Belsize Park, Hampstead, the Suburb and East Finchley.

The creation of the Trail follows the Highgate Society’s successful Circular Walk around ‘London’s Northern Inspiration to Suburb architects, Rothenburg Bavaria Heights’, covering Highgate, Hampstead and the Heath. • The significance and value of the Suburb whilst working on the Suburb need to be widely understood; booklets that he recently made a The Trust’s involvement reflects pilgrimage of sorts to Rothenburg, the the importance of educating and • Its important place in the social German town which inspired Parker encouraging visitors to the Suburb. history and architectural fabric of & Unwin when designing the Suburb. England should permeate the Whilst most people with an interest consciousness of us all. in town planning or architectural Moving on from the success and heritage have heard of the Suburb, It is a long term aim of the Trust to positive reviews of the Northern relatively few have actually visited. explain the Suburb’s history and special Heights books, our next step is to look qualities of place to everyone; from at exploring the influence the Bavarian The Suburb needs protection and school children through the interested town had on Suburb architects, in constant vigilance. High land value visitor to the judiciary and parliament. collaboration with Mr Webber and creates pressures for over-development Its future lies in all their hands. contacts in Rothenburg. and degradation. If the Suburb’s charm, beauty and sense of place are The publication of these walking tours The booklets cost between £3 and £5 to be conserved: represents several steps in that direction. each. Complete set of 9, £25.

Fortis The project was initiated and overseen Available from the Trust office, local Green Market Place by Richard Webber of the Highgate shops, Garden Suburb Gallery and Alexandra Muswell Society, who was so taken with the Library or via www.northernheights.eu. Hill Palace East Temple Section A Fortune Finchley Hampstead to Belsize Park – Start: Hampstead Underground Station. Length: 2.5 miles Whitestone Section B Pond Burg House Belsize Park to Camden Town – Start: Belsize Park Underground Station. Length: 3.3 miles Keats House Section C Belsize Park Hampstead Hampstead to Temple Fortune – Start: Hampstead Underground Station. Length: 3.1 miles Chalk Farm Camden Lock Section D Primrose Hill Temple Fortune to East Finchley – Start: Temple Fortune. Length: 2.8 miles Section E Regents Park Camden Town East Finchley to Alexandra Palace – Start: East Finchley Underground Station. Length: 3.4 miles

3 860-864 Finchley Road

to its intended use and to restore the income from it.

Suburb residents were consulted about the design of this building and their responses were published in February 2012.

The work (funded from Trust reserves and not from the Management Charge) started in July 2012, and will: • Provide an appropriate return on investment; • Return the upper floors to residential use, restoring the rental income it was The Trust’s main property asset planning permission to use one of the originally intended to provide; is its building at 860-864 Finchley flats for this purpose. This permission Road. Designed in 1935 by was for temporary use and entailed the • Create more efficient offices, all on J.C.S. Soutar, the building loss of the rent from the flat – more one level; combined architectural elegance valuable than its income as an office. • Provide a larger meeting room, with financial enterprise. The available to the community for It is the Trust’s policy to invest its ground floor was office space for evening meetings; the Trust; the upper floors were reserves in property on the Suburb. Its • Provide space for the Archive Trust; two residential flats, bringing in improved financial position enables it rents to support the Trust’s work to build a single storey extension to • Improve access for people with for the Suburb. the rear of 860-864 Finchley Road. disabilities;

In 2006, the Trust needed more office This provides the space the Trust • Be an exemplar of good building space. The local authority granted needs and enables it to return the flat practice. Falloden Way Gas Works

As part of a £300,000 investment This work has been carefully Borough of Barnet have planned the program, National Grid are scheduled to coincide with Transport works in consultation with the Trust planning to upgrade 2km of for London’s road resurfacing work to ensure that the upgrade is carried metallic gas mains along Falloden between Hill Rise and Ossulton Way. out with minimum disruption to Way from September 2012. The work is scheduled to take about residents, and customer information 26 weeks and will involve some packs are being sent out. The new hard-wearing plastic pipes changes in road access, affecting Hill should last for many years, and are Rise and Northway at the junction of fitted by being inserted into the existing Falloden Way. Signed diversions will pipes, which reduces the need for also ban right turns into and out of digging continuous trenches along the Eastholm, Westholm and Midholm. stretch of road between the North Transport for London and the London Circular and Hill Rise.

4 The Sharing of Great Things: Landscape in the Garden Suburb

Trust Architectural Advisor The Trust will publicise the details of David Davidson spoke earlier this this event later this year. year at the Landscape Institute, on the topic The Sharing of Great Things – From Garden City to Green City. Looking specifically at landscape in and around the Suburb, David will be giving his lecture this December to Suburb residents (date & venue TBC).

The lecture will explore the late 19th century disillusionment with urban life which led to the development of Garden Cities, and the artistic problem of creating humane, healthy and affordable living environments for working people beyond utility and towards beauty.

Henrietta Barnett’s “Beautiful Green Golden Scheme” was an idealised and sentimental vision which placed nature at the centre of her dream. The widely different green spaces around the Suburb were designed to promote social interaction, enhance human activity, offer recreation, health, productivity and beauty, and encourage The Sharing of Great Things - cooperation and empowerment. original plans for green space and gardens on the Suburb Education and Training

The Trust’s recent crop of out three summer placements with GCSE students have worked on digital students and graduates carrying us whilst studying in Manchester. mapping projects and assisted our out work experience placements Paul worked on illustrating the soon Architectural Advisers on site visits, have assisted in progress and to be republished Design Guidance, whilst an A Level student contributed innovation on a number of and spent a lot of time organising the to photo surveys and walking tours. important projects, proving that Trust archives. The Trust continues to offer work training and education is He kept a journal of his time at the placements to resident volunteers and important and useful for both Trust, which reads: “Touching on social university-age architecture students, parties, and that students are history, cartography, town planning, and is always happy to discuss such never left making the tea. design and much more, everything opportunities with those looking to Paul Capewell, a recent Library & associated with the Suburb seems learn about town planning, Information Studies graduate, carried fascinating to me.” architecture and conservation.

5 The Trust Committees

The Trust benefits from the freely walkabouts. The annual and long term There are eight unpaid Trustees given time of many residents, and budgets for capital works and regular (directors) of the Trust, who constitute in the past few years the Trust has maintenance are discussed with the a variety of opinions and priorities. become ever more aware of the Finance Committee and are then Four of the eight Trustees must live importance of their contribution. subject to approval by the Trust Council. outside the Suburb, and are Including elected Trustees, there are The Finance & Organisation independent experts in architecture, now twenty residents who sit as Committee provides advice to the law and planning who provide members of the Trust’s advisory Trust Council on financial matters professional advice. These four are committees for Estate Management, affecting the Trust. The Committee appointed by the Royal Institute of Finance & Organisation, Grants reviews the Trust’s budgets, annual British Architects, the Royal Town and Property & Plans. Sixteen of accounts, investment policy and risk Planning Institute, The Victorian them are non-trustee volunteers and registers and makes recommendations Society and The Law Society. their enthusiastic and lively participation to the Trustees. The remaining four Trustees are elected. has done much to invigorate the The Grants and Amenities They are Suburb residents who are Trust’s work and to ensure that the Committee advises the Trust Council aware of local issues and may make a Trust Council reaches its decisions in the exercise of its charitable less technical but more personal input assisted by their experience and often functions and the development of and provide a democratic element. their professional expertise. These policy with especial reference to the non-trustee volunteers are very This provides a balance between support and strengthening of the important in strengthening the Trust professional conservation opinions social fabric of the Suburb. This Council’s understanding of residents’ and the views of the inhabitants. The includes advice on the award of grants hopes and concerns. first duty of all Trustees however, is to Suburb bodies engaged in charitable to the best interests of the Charity. The Property and Plans Committee activity that is of benefit to residents. advises the Trust Council on applications for development. In doing Being a volunteer so it applies the terms of the Design member of a Trust Trust Council Guidance issued by the Trust Council. Committee 4 members appointed by: The Committee is able to devote more A number of the volunteers are time than is available to the Council Royal Institute of British nominated by the Residents to each individual case. The Architects – Simon Hurst Association but any resident may ask Committee meets nine times a year to Royal Town Planning to be considered for membership of a review drawings and reports and to Institute – Phillipa Aitken Trust Committee and the Trust will, make recommendations to be put to from time to time, seek volunteer Victorian Society – Tim Leach the Trust Council for final decisions. members. Volunteer members are Law Society – Jonathan Ross The Estate Committee is an bound by the same undertakings of advisory committee to the Trust confidentiality as Trustees. Volunteers Independence/Objectivity Council in the exercise of the Trust’s are appointed or co-opted for three estate management functions. The years, after which their membership 4 members elected Trust’s estate is the land and built must again be confirmed. Volunteer by residents: fabric on the Suburb managed by the members are not expected to serve for Judith Chaney, Trust. The committee advises on more than two consecutive terms of Geoffrey Marriott, priorities for capital works and regular three years without a break. Angus Walker & Saul Zadka maintenance. The annual and long The Trust Council is the ultimate Local knowledge term members review completed decision-making body of the Trust. estate projects on regular estate

6 TRUST COUNCIL

PROPERTY & PLANS FINANCE ESTATE GRANTS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE

Volunteers Volunteers Volunteers Volunteers Jonathan Rowley Jeremy Clynes Claire Calman Simon Abbott Geoffrey Spyer Robin Marks Pia Duran John Freeborn (alternate David Lewis) Richard Wiseman Philip Freedman Eva Jacobs Rosalind Josephs Sally Lewis Trustees Trustees Helen Leiser Judith Chaney Trustees Geoffrey Marriott Steven Rosen Simon Hurst Angus Walker Judith Chaney Tim Leach Trustees Angus Walker Geoffrey Marriott Judith Chaney Saul Zadka Saul Zadka Geoffrey Marriott

TRUST STAFF

Estate works – Resurfacing at Farm Walk

An Estate walkabout with residents New roadside wildflowers at Farm Walk

7 The Scheme of Management Charge

The Management Charge The Trust’s expectations than £140 or less than £100. This for 2012/13 has been for the future level of represents an increase in the mid- point of the expectation since 2008 of estimated at £129.10. the Management Charge about 8%. In the three years since There is a rebate of £44.10* against The Trust Council expects that, 2008 the Retail Price Index has risen each Management Charge for for the foreseeable future, the by about 14%. 2011/12. This is offset against the annual expense of operating the Volatility of the Charge for the current year 2012/13 Scheme of Management will be so that for most properties the net not more than £150 or less than Management Charge payable in August 2012 is £85.00. £110 in 2012 monetary values The Management Charge is subject to for each property unit liable to pay *the rebate is reduced for any property considerable volatility because the the Management Charge. The central that became freehold after 5 April 2008: Trust is subject to charges expectation is that the Charge will be especially with respect to litigation After about £130 annually. and to insurance claims the timing • 5 April 2008 ...... £39.80 This is the first increase in the upper and size of which are difficult to • 5 April 2009 ...... £34.30 level of the Council’s expectations for predict. This difficulty is exacerbated • 5 April 2010 ...... £30.20 Scheme expenses since 2008/09 when by the prohibition in the Scheme • 5 April 2011 ...... £14.70 the range was estimated at not more against accumulating reserves to even The rebate is due to the successful out the fluctuations in annual defence of a legal challenge (see page 1).

The Management Charge 2004/05 to 2011/12 – £ Money of the day

Actual Audited expenditure Estimated Expenditure Range of maximum and minimum charge

160

140

120

100

AMOUNT 80 IN £ 60

0 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14

YEAR 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14

Actual 81 90 77 82 104 126 121 121 Expenditure

Estimated 47 50 110 99 110 118 119 125 129 Expenditure

8 expenditure; any surplus in the Scheme budgeting skills together with the extent is the property of the Freeholders and to which chance favours the Trust – a Changes to must be returned to them in the year mixture of luck and judgement. But, following that in which it occurs. As in the long run, the cumulative Trust Postal against this, legal expenses incurred cost of the Management Charge Arrangements over a number of years are, when will exactly equal the cumulative recovered, credited to the Scheme in a cost of the Scheme expenses as Following recent rises in postage single year thus increasing the size of rebates are returned and costs, the Trust has taken the the fluctuations in net expense. surcharges levied. The success of decision to acquire a franking machine. This will substantially Scheme of Management the Trust in controlling the finances of the Scheme is thus best illustrated lower the cost of postage. Operating Expenses. by concentrating on its expenditure. We are also taking steps to contact Because when the Charge is set, it is The graph opposite shows actual and residents by email where possible. an estimate for the remainder of estimated expenditure. If you would like the Trust to the coming year, it will almost contact you electronically in future, certainly differ from the audited It shows how expenses have stabilised please email [email protected] expenses at the end of the year. since 2008-2009. It also shows how with CONTACT ME BY EMAIL in The closeness of the level of the accurate the Trust Council’s forecasts the subject line. Please remember to Charge to the level of audited of expenditure have been since they include your name and address. expenses is a measure of the Trust’s were first made in 2008. Grants given by the Trust

The Trust is enabled to make • Fellowship: for the alleviation of • Abbeyfield: to support outings grants under the terms of its hardship on the Suburb (with for residents...... £250 constitution (from its own funds, special reference to ability to pay • Bench in memory of the Management Charge)...... £1,100 not from the Scheme of Management) Chris Kellerman...... £200 to Suburb-based organisations that • St Jude-on-the-Hill: for the • Henrietta Barnett School: benefit residents. reduction of hedge heights on for a project related to Central Square...... £1,000 Charitable giving is presently the Suburb...... £100 constrained by the continued deficit • Garden Suburb Theatre...... £780 Grant application forms for 2013/2014 on the Trust’s operating account but • Orchard Housing Society: can be obtained from the Trust office. it is increasing as Trust finances for refurbishing the improve and this year totalled £8,480. communal lounge...... £500 Abbeyfield residents enjoying an outing Based on recommendations by the Grants Committee, grants were made in 2011/2012 as contributions to:

• Proms at St Jude’s...... £2,750

• Lyttelton Playing Fields playground renovation project ...... £1,000

• Open House weekend...... £800

9 Management Charge Challenges

In common with other bodies way the Scheme is operated by the The Trust’s work in 2011/12 levying charges like the Management Suburb Trust. – vital statistics Charge, the Trust is ultimately Although the Determination is accountable to charge payers • 230 applications received formally satisfactory, the Surveyor through the Courts and also has been criticised for the manner of • 663 site visits and inspections through the process laid down in his proceeding. the Scheme of Management. • Consultation policy The Determination was first wrongly implemented This enables residents to require the made for the year 2010/2011. When Trust to ask the President of the • 20 Infringement Notices served the Surveyor’s attention was drawn Royal Institution of Chartered to this it was withdrawn and a • 10 Infringements rectified Surveyors to appoint a Surveyor as an Determination issued by him for the “Independent Expert” to determine • 17 enforcement cases year in dispute, 2009/10. The second the charge. The Surveyor has to document was not in its reasoning • £140,000 legal costs recovered consider whether the amount of the charge is fair and reasonable and different from the first and the • 540 visits by tree consultant whether the Scheme has been Surveyor argued that there was no • 8 mature oak trees defended operated in an economical, efficient difference in the principles concerned and consistent manner. and in response to criticism observed • £8,480 grants to Suburb that “the figures within my Determination good causes The level of the Management Charge were principally there by way of illustration • 12 guided tours of the Suburb has been subject to three challenges in and the arguments in connection with the recent years: management charges remain precisely the • Farm Walk path resurfaced • 2005/2006 at the Leasehold Valuation same.” Even so the Trust was obliged • 2 Trust roads resurfaced Tribunal at a cost to charge payers of to write and correct a number of some £13,000; mistakes in reference to matters of • Sunshine Corner restoration fact in the Determination. completed • 2008/2009 through the appointment of a Surveyor at a fee to charge payers The petitioners felt that the mistakes • Trust Allotments improved of £8,400; in proceeding invalidated the determination and, regardless of • 2009/2010 through the appointment whether this is so, have asked for the of another Surveyor at an initial fee repayment of the Surveyor’s fee. of £11,439; The Trust was also disappointed The most recent Surveyor’s report, because it would have preferred the issued on 22 March 2012, concludes: Determination to have been produced “I have not been able to agree on any of efficiently. The Surveyor’s failure to the substantive matters raised by do so has unnecessarily generated ‘Concerned Residents’ and Objectors.” further debate and correspondence. The Trust also feels that it would be This Determination is good at law appropriate for the Surveyor to forego and the Management Charge at his fee. £125.80 per household for the year 2009/2010 has been confirmed. The Surveyor’s fee remains the subject of discussion and negotiation. The latest report agrees with previous decisions in upholding Further information can be found on both the level of the charge and the the Trust website.

10 The Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust Limited – Annual Report and Accounts 2011/2012 23

24 The Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust Limited – Annual Report and Accounts 2011/2012

24. RESOURCES EXPENDED ALLOCATED TO FUNDS AND RELATING TO MANAGEMENT CHARGE YEAR ENDED 5 APRIL 2012

Expenditure items Total General Fund & Scheme of Management Cost per 2010/2011 Restricted Funds charge £ £ £ £ £ £

1. Staff costs: 363,628 65,453 298,175 Staff salaries inc PAYE & NI, contract & temporary staff, employee & volunteer expenses, training costs Less: Income from fees on freehold applications (96,416) (96,416) Net staff costs 201,759 55.61 48.29

2. Premises costs: 53,479 9,626 43,853 12.09 11.16 Ofﬁce rent, utilities, telephone, Council Tax, repairs and renewals, cleaning etc.

3. Administrative costs: 62,345 14,030 48,3151 13.32 10.56 Insurance (except for Trustees), ofﬁce equipment, printing, postage & stationery, public relations, bank charges, depreciation

4. Governance costs: 5,451 981 4,470 1.23 1.23 Trustee insurance and travelling expenses

5. Projects and amenities costs: 149,133 114,464 34,669 9.56 5.03 Maintenance of amenity areas and other projects

6. Legal costs: 107,471 39,179 68,292 18.82 33.79 Legal costs for general advice and litigation

7. Other professional costs: Arboriculturalist, human resources, valuation and 34,999 15,054 19,945 5.50 6.43 other advice Surveyor’s fee for determination of the 11,439 11,439 3.15 2.33 Management Charge

8. Audit fees: 8,899 3,055 5,844 1.61 2.08

Expenditure 700,428 235,416 438,586 120.89 120.90

Income from fees on freehold applications 96,416 Income from recovery of legal fees 141,784 Total management charges including in-year enfranchisers 456,744

Total income 694,944 Total expenditure 535,004

rounded Balance of Management Charges to be (charged) credited to freeholders 159,940 44.10 ﬁgure

The Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust Limited Formerly The New Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust Limited (A company limited by guarantee and having no share capital) At 6 April 2011 management charges payable: 3,615. At 6 April 2012 management charges payable: 3,642. Average for year: 3,628. 862 Finchley Road, Hampstead Garden Suburb, London NW11 6AB Tel: 020 8455 1066 / 020 8458 8085 Email: [email protected]

Company number: 928520 This extract from the Trust’s audited Annual Report & Accounts shows how the Management Charge was spent. The full report is sent to all members of the Trust (applicationRegistered form charity on number:the back 1050098 of this Gazette). Registered in England

11 Become a Member of the Suburb Trust

Membership of the Trust is not The Trust differs from most becoming Members. Residents may automatic and is entirely voluntary companies in that while fulfilling its become Members, free of charge, if (unlike the obligation to pay the objective to conserve and maintain they are over 18 and have lived on the Management Charge or Ground Rent). the character and amenities of the Suburb for more than 3 years. By choosing to become Members Suburb it produces no profits or Residents who have lived on the residents have the opportunity to dividends. The Trust does not have Suburb for less than 3 years can keep up to date with Trust news, shareholders but Members who have become Associate Members. Forms receive the annual report and accounts no financial commitment and a limited liquidation liability of £1. are available from the Trust office. and to participate in the Annual General Meeting. Members receive The Trust hopes that Suburb residents If you have any questions about invitations to occasional lectures and who believe that conservation of this membership please do not hesitate to other Trust events. unique area is important will consider contact the Trust office.

APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP

Please send completed forms to: The Membership Secretary, The Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust, 862 Finchley Road, London, NW11 6AB

I (Mr/Mrs/Miss/Ms) (FULL NAME IN BLOCK CAPITALS)

of (FULL ADDRESS IN BLOCK CAPITALS)

Email address

hereby apply for membership of The Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust Limited subject to the provisions of the Memorandum of Articles of Association thereof. I declare that I am a resident* in the Hampstead Garden Suburb and that I have been continuously since (at least 3 years before application) and am over 18 years of age.

Date Signature

* ‘resident’ in the case of a corporation means entitled in the opinion of the Council of the Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust Limited to be treated as a resident of the Hampstead Garden Suburb.

Contacting The Trust

Residents are welcome to contact the Trust Manager, Jane Blackburn, on any aspect of the Trust’s work.

862 Finchley Road, Hampstead Garden Suburb, London, NW11 6AB Tel: 020 8455 1066 • Website: www.hgstrust.org • E-mail: [email protected] • Twitter: @HGSTrust Company registration number: 928520 • Registered charity number: 1050098