DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 138/Wednesday, July

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 138/Wednesday, July 41050 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 19, 2006 / Notices Landmark Program in 1962 under the ACTION: Public Notice of National Kansas: Baldwin Woods authority of the Historic Sites Act of Natural Landmark Boundary Changes Kentucky: Henderson Sloughs 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.). The and De-designations. Maine: Appleton Bog Atlantic White Cedar National Park Service (NPS) manages Stand; Orono Bog; Passadumkeag Marsh this program using regulations found at SUMMARY: Secretarial action on May 9, and Boglands; Penny Pond-Joe Pond Complex 36 CFR part 62. Potential natural 2006, formally removed National Natural Landmark (NNL) designations Massachusetts: Lynfield Marsh; North and landmarks are identified in studies by South Rivers the NPS and from other sources, in response to owner requests. This action resulted in boundary changes to Minnesota: Upper Red Lake Peatland evaluated by expert natural scientists, Nebraska: Dissected Loess Plains; Nebraska and, if determined nationally 66 NNLs and complete de-designation Sand Hills significant, designated as landmarks by of 8 NNLs. New Jersey: Pigeon Swamp; Troy Meadows the Secretary of the Interior. When FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. New Mexico: Border Hills Structural Zone; designated, a landmark is included in Margaret Brooks at 520–670–6501 Kilbourne Hole the National Registry of Natural extension 232. North Carolina: Smith Island Landmarks, which currently lists 580 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Secretarial North Dakota: Fischer Lake; Rush Lake; National Natural Landmarks action pursuant to 36 CFR 62.8(f)(3) Sibley Lake Oregon: Newberry Crater nationwide. Of the 580 listed occurred on May 9, 2006. This action Pennsylvania: Pine Creek Gorge; Tannersville landmarks, half are administered solely formally removed National Natural Cranberry Bog by public agencies; i.e., Federal, State, Landmark (NNL) designations in South Dakota: Cottonwood Slough-Dry Run; county or municipal governments. response to owner requests. all such Lake Thompson Nearly one-third are owned solely by requests that have been fully processed Tennessee: Grassy Cove Karst Area private parties. The remaining natural have been granted. These removals Texas: Catfish Creek landmarks are owned or administered resulted in the de-designation of eight Vermont: Cornwall Swamp; Franklin Bog by a mixture of public and private NNLS, listed below, and boundary U.S. Virgin Islands: Coki Point Cliffs; Sand owners. Because many natural adjustments to 66 additional NNLs, also Point landmarks are privately owned or not listed below. these de-designations and Virginia: Grand Caverns Washington: Boulder Park & McNeil Canyon managed for public access, owner boundary adjustments were reviewed by Haystack; Drumheller Channels; Grand permission must be obtained to visit the National Park Service Advisory Ronde Goosenecks; Sims Corner Eskers them. Designation does not infer a right Board in July 2004 prior to being and Kames; Steptoe and Kamaiak Buttes; of public access. presented to the Secretary for action. Withrow Moraine & Jamison Lake Drumlin National natural landmark notification of the owners who West Virginia: Organ Cave System designation is not a land withdrawal, requested that the designation be (Greenbirar Caverns) does not change the ownership of an removed from their property was made Wisconsin: Cedarburg Bog; Ridges Santuary- area and does not dictate activity. at the start of the removal process in Toft’s Point-Mud Lake Area However, Federal agencies should 2000. By regulation, this is a one-time Wyoming: Big Hollow; Como Bluff; Red consider impacts to the unique action, and all removal requests Canyon; Sand Creek properties of these nationally significant pertaining to the 74 NNLs listed below The Secretary of the Interior areas in carrying out their were granted. Requests for removal from established the National Natural responsibilities under the National other NNLs are still being processed. Landmarks Program in 1962 under the Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. The following National Landmarks authority of the Historic Sites Act of 4321 et seq.). Designation could result were de-designated: 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.). The in State or local planning or land use Alaska: Middleton Island National Park Service (NPS) manages implications. National Natural Georgia: Sag Ponds Natural Area; Spooner this program using regulations found at Landmark preservation is made possible Springs 36 CFR part 62. Potential natural by the long-term, voluntary Maine: Meddybemps Heath landmarks are identified in studies by New York: Gardiner’s Island commitments of public and private the NPS and from other sources, owners to protect the outstanding values West Virginia: Swago Karst Wyoming: Bone Cabin; Lance Creek evaluated by expert natural scientists, of the areas. Information on the National and, if determined nationally Natural Landmark Program can be The boundaries of the following significant, designated as landmarks by found in 36 CFR part 62 or on the National Natural Landmarks were the Secretary of the Interior. When Internet at www1.nature.nps.gov/nnl/ revised: designated, a landmark is included in index.htm. Alabama: Newsome Sinks Karst Area the National Registry of Natural Dated: May 22, 2006. Alaska: Lake George; Malaspina Glacier; Landmarks, which currently lists 580 Margaret A. Brooks, Mount Veniamenof National Natural Landmarks California: American River Bluffs & Phoenix National Natural Landmark Program Park Vernal Pools; Dixon Vernal Pools; nationwide. Of the 580 listed Manager. Elder Creek; Imperial Sand Hills, Mt. landmarks, half are administered solely [FR Doc. 06–6350 Filed 7–18–06; 8:45 am] Diablo State Park; Nipomo Dunes-Point Sal by public agencies; ie., Federal, State, BILLING CODE 4310–70–M Coastal Area county or municipal governments. Colorado: Slumgullion Earth Flow; Spanish nearly one-third are owned solely by Peaks private parties. The remaining natural DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Connecticut: Chester Cedar Swamp; Pachaug- landmarks are owned or administered Great Meadow Swamp by a mixture of public and private National Park Service Florida: Emeralda MarshPaynes Prairie; San owners. Because many natural Felasco Hammock landmarks are privately owned or not Notice of Multiple National Natural Georgia: Ebenezer Creek Swamp Landmark Boundary Changes and De- Idaho: Menan Buttes managed for public access, owner designations Illinois: Lower Cache River Swamp; permission must be obtained to visit Markham Prairie them. Designation does not infer a right AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. Indiana: Big Walnut Creek of public access. VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:28 Jul 18, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 138 / Wednesday, July 19, 2006 / Notices 41051 National natural landmark the Plan of Operations and Categorical The proposed consent decree would designation is not a land withdrawal, Exclusion are available upon request resolve the United States’ claims, on does not change the ownership of an from the contact listed below. behalf of the Environmental Protection area and does not dictate activity. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Agency (‘‘EPA’’), under Section 107(a) However, Federal agencies should Haigler Dusty Pate, Oil and Gas Program of the Comprehensive Environmental consider impacts to the unique Manager, Big Thicket National Preserve, Response, Compensation, and Liability properties of these nationally significant 6044 FM 420, Kountze, Texas 77625, Act (‘‘CERCLA’’). 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), areas in carrying out their Telephone: (490) 951–6822, e-mail at against CBS Corporation (‘‘CBS’’), responsibilities under the National [email protected]. Winner Development Company, Inc. Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. (‘‘Winner Inc.’’), Winner Development, 3232 et seq.). Designation could result SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you LLC (‘‘Winner LLC’’), and AK Steel in state or local planning or land use wish to comment on the Plan of Corporation (‘‘AK Steel’’) to recover implications. National Natural Operations and Categorical Exclusion, costs incurred by the United States in Landmark preservation is made possible you may mail comments to the name performing response actions at the by the long-term, voluntary and address above or post comments Westinghouse Sharon Superfund Site commitments of public and private online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/. (‘‘Site’’) in Sharon, Mercer County, owners to protect the outstanding values The documents will be on public review Pennsylvania as set forth in the terms of of the areas. Information on the National for 30 days. Our practice is to make the decree. CBS, Winner Inc., Winner Natural Landmarks Program can be comments, including names, home LLC, and AK Steel are liable for the found in 36 CFR part 62 or on the addresses, home phone numbers, and e- United States’ response costs under Internet at http://www.nature.nps.gov/ mail addresses of respondents, available Section 107(a)(1) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. nnl. for public review. Individual 9607(a)(2) because they are current respondents may request that we Dated: June 19, 2006. owners of the Site. Further, CBS is also withhold their names and/or home Margaret A. Brooks, liable under Section 107(a)(2) of addresses, etc., but if you wish us to CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a)(2), because National Natural Landmarks Program consider withholding this information Manager. its predecessor owned or operated,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elkhorn Slough Estuary
    A RICH NATURAL RESOURCE YOU CAN HELP! Elkhorn Slough Estuary WATER QUALITY REPORT CARD Located on Monterey Bay, Elkhorn Slough and surround- There are several ways we can all help improve water 2015 ing wetlands comprise a network of estuarine habitats that quality in our communities: include salt and brackish marshes, mudflats, and tidal • Limit the use of fertilizers in your garden. channels. • Maintain septic systems to avoid leakages. • Dispose of pharmaceuticals properly, and prevent Estuarine wetlands harsh soaps and other contaminants from running are rare in California, into storm drains. and provide important • Buy produce from local farmers applying habitat for many spe- sustainable management practices. cies. Elkhorn Slough • Vote for the environment by supporting candidates provides special refuge and bills favoring clean water and habitat for a large number of restoration. sea otters, which rest, • Let your elected representatives and district forage and raise pups officials know you care about water quality in in the shallow waters, Elkhorn Slough and support efforts to reduce question: How is the water in Elkhorn Slough? and nap on the salt marshes. Migratory shorebirds by the polluted run-off and to restore wetlands. thousands stop here to rest and feed on tiny creatures in • Attend meetings of the Central Coast Regional answer: It could be a lot better… the mud. Leopard sharks by the hundreds come into the Water Quality Control Board to share your estuary to give birth. concerns and support for action. Elkhorn Slough estuary hosts diverse wetland habitats, wildlife and recreational activities. Such diversity depends Thousands of people come to Elkhorn Slough each year JOIN OUR EFFORT! to a great extent on the quality of the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Everglades Ridge, Slough, and Tree Island Mosaics: Year 2 Annual Report Michael S
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons SERC Research Reports Southeast Environmental Research Center 2010 Everglades Ridge, Slough, and Tree Island Mosaics: Year 2 Annual Report Michael S. Ross Southeast Environmental Research Center & Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University James B. Heffernan Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University Jay P. Sah Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University Pablo L. Ruiz Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University Adam A. Spitzig Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp Part of the Earth Sciences Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Ross, Michael S.; Heffernan, James B.; Sah, Jay P.; Ruiz, Pablo L.; Spitzig, Adam A.; and Isherwood, Ewan, "Everglades Ridge, Slough, and Tree Island Mosaics: Year 2 Annual Report" (2010). SERC Research Reports. 100. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp/100 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Southeast Environmental Research Center at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in SERC Research Reports by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Michael S. Ross, James B. Heffernan, Jay P. Sah, Pablo L. Ruiz, Adam A. Spitzig, and Ewan Isherwood This report is available at FIU Digital Commons: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp/100 Year 2 Annual Report: Everglades Ridge, Slough, and Tree Island Mosaics Date of Submission: By: Michael S. Ross, Southeast Environmental Research Center & Department of Earth and Environment, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th ST, Miami, FL 33199 Tel 305-348-1420; Fax 305-348-4096; Email: [email protected] James B.
    [Show full text]
  • Watsonville Sloughs Hydrology Study
    Watsonville Sloughs Hydrology Study Prepared For: Santa Cruz Resource Conservation District Prepared by: In collaboration with: February 14, 2014 WATSONVILLE SLOUGHS HYDROLOGY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Data Collection Program ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Hydrologic modeling ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1 OBJECTIVES AND TECHNICAL APPROACH ........................................................................................ 8 1.1 Format of this Report ................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Project Funding ............................................................................................................................................ 8 1.3 Study Objectives ........................................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Work Plan ................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Acknowledgments .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Drought Contingency Plan May 1, 2021 – September 30, 2021
    State Water Project and Central Valley Project Drought Contingency Plan May 1, 2021 – September 30, 2021 Table of Contents I. Current Hydrologic Conditions ...........................................................................................................4 A. Water Quality ................................................................................................................................. 6 B. SWP and CVP Upstream Reservoir Storage .................................................................................7 C. Biology ..........................................................................................................................................7 i. Salmonids ..................................................................................................................................7 ii. Delta Smelt ................................................................................................................................8 iii. Longfin Smelt .............................................................................................................................9 II. SWP and CVP Operational Considerations .....................................................................................10 A. Health and Safety Requirements ................................................................................................. 10 B. Fish and Wildlife Protections .......................................................................................................10 C. Regulatory and Senior Water
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Planning Implications
    DRAFT 4 City of Goleta, California May 2004 BACKGROUND REPORT NO. 24 Hydrology and Water Quality INTRODUCTION This background report describes the hydrological characteristics of the City of Goleta. The City of Goleta’s hydrological features consist of creeks and associated flood plains, ponds, wetlands, and the Ocean. While this report provides an overview of these resources, other reports examine particular areas or issues in the City in greater depth. These reports include Ellwood Mesa Open Space Plan and the related Environmental Impact Report; Comstock Homes Development and Ellwood Mesa Open Space Plan, March 2004, Goleta Slough Ecosystem Management Plan, December 1997, and Water Quality Analysis Report, County of Santa Barbara, December 2003. PLANNING IMPLICATIONS Since hydrological features shape the land forms of an area, these features contribute to the physical character of the community. Hydrological forces create these land forms through processes such as erosion and flooding. These processes in turn pose constraints and hazards for use and development. Water, as the basis for all life, creates the environment for the community’s biological resources and ecology. Modification of the hydrological system, either by physical alteration or by change in water quality, will affect these biological systems. The potential of adverse impacts associated with development is an important constraint on how land might be used, developed or managed. Water and its quality affects other aspects of the quality of life since water is the basis of many recreational activities. City of Goleta, California XXIV-1 General Plan Report: Hydrology GENERAL TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE The City of Goleta is situated in the western portion of the Goleta Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Subsidence to Estimate Carbon Loss from Deforested and Drained Tropical Peatlands in Indonesia
    Review The Use of Subsidence to Estimate Carbon Loss from Deforested and Drained Tropical Peatlands in Indonesia Gusti Z. Anshari 1,2 , Evi Gusmayanti 1,3 and Nisa Novita 4,* 1 Magister of Environmental Science, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak 78124, Indonesia; [email protected] (G.Z.A.); [email protected] (E.G.) 2 Soil Science Department, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak 78124, Indonesia 3 Agrotechnology Department, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak 78124, Indonesia 4 Yayasan Konservasi Alam Nusantara, DKI Jakarta 12160, Indonesia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Drainage is a major means of the conversion of tropical peat forests into agriculture. Accordingly, drained peat becomes a large source of carbon. However, the amount of carbon (C) loss from drained peats is not simply measured. The current C loss estimate is usually based on a single proxy of the groundwater table, spatially and temporarily dynamic. The relation between groundwater table and C emission is commonly not linear because of the complex natures of heterotrophic carbon emission. Peatland drainage or lowering groundwater table provides plenty of oxygen into the upper layer of peat above the water table, where microbial activity becomes active. Consequently, lowering the water table escalates subsidence that causes physical changes of organic matter (OM) and carbon emission due to microbial oxidation. This paper reviews peat bulk density (BD), total organic carbon (TOC) content, and subsidence rate of tropical peat forest and drained peat. Data of BD, TOC, and subsidence were derived from published and unpublished sources. We Citation: Anshari, G.Z.; Gusmayanti, found that BD is generally higher in the top surface layer in drained peat than in the undrained peat.
    [Show full text]
  • Elkhorn Slough Tidal Wetland Project Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve Elkhorn Slough Foundation
    Elkhorn Slough Tidal Wetland Project Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve Elkhorn Slough Foundation Management of Tidal Scour and Wetland Conversion in Elkhorn Slough: Partial Synthesis of Technical Reports on Large-Scale Alternatives: Hydrology, Geomorphology, Habitats and Engineering Water Quality June 2010 Note: This is a living document. Forward comments and questions to Bryan Largay: [email protected] The following individuals wrote this document: Bryan Largay, Erin McCarthy The following individuals provided review and comments: Robert Curry, Ed S. Gross, Ken Johnson, Quinn Labadie, Jessie R. Lacy, Erika McPhee Shaw, Kerstin Wasson, and Andrea Woolfolk Management of Tidal Scour and Wetland Conversion in Elkhorn Slough Hydrology, Habitats and Water Quality: Effects of Five Alternatives Overview Project scope Elkhorn Slough, one of the largest coastal estuaries in California and host to over 750 species of plants and animals, is undergoing rapid ecologic change: in 60 years the channel has deepened by 500 percent and hundreds of acres of salt marsh have died back or are deteriorating. The Elkhorn Slough Tidal Wetland Project, a collaborative effort of about 100 scientists, managers and key stakeholders, was established in 2004 to advance the understanding of the processes and potential solutions to these rapid habitat changes. Ecosystem services provided by the slough and its watershed are threatened by water quality impairment, invasive species, watershed development, freshwater diversion and other stressors, which are the subject of coordinated parallel efforts to steward the resource. The Tidal Wetland Project is a planning process focused on the tidal portion of the ecosystem. Through consensus, this process established goals of preserving and restoring priority habitats including salt marsh, tidal creeks, tidal brackish marshes and soft sediment habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Mile Slough Wetland Restoration Project
    Six Mile Slough Wetland Restoration Project Waterfowl taking flight Northern leopard frog Thomas R. Biebighauser Robin Annschild February 6, 2016 Six Mile Slough Wetland Restoration Project Report Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Drainage History ............................................................................................................................. 5 Enlarging the outflow of Kootenay Lake: .................................................................................. 5 Crowsnest Railroad ..................................................................................................................... 6 Ranch Operations ........................................................................................................................ 8 West Duck Lake Dike ............................................................................................................... 11 Libby Dam ................................................................................................................................ 12 Wetland Compartments ............................................................................................................ 13 River Bank Low Places ............................................................................................................. 16 Summary of Impacts to Six Mile Slough .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Woody Wetland Vegetation Communities Along Gum Slough
    VEGETATION APPENDIX Characterization of Woody Wetland Vegetation Communities along Gum Slough Submitted to: Southwest Florida Water Management District Submitted by: 4030 Boy Scout Boulevard Tampa, Florida 33607 August 2010 Executive Summary The purpose of this study was to characterize relationships among vegetation, soils, and elevations in wetlands along Gum Slough, in Sumter County, Florida, and assist the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) in establishing minimum flows and levels (MFLs) for the river. Vegetation classes, plant species importance, soil characteristics, and elevations were characterized along 8 transects within the upper reaches of Gum Slough. The study corridor extended 1.6 miles downstream from Transect PHABSIM1 and the slough flows 3.5 miles farther downstream to its confluence with the Withlacoochee River. Vegetation. The permanent ground water flows and clear water of the spring-fed Gum Slough differentiate it from streams and rivers dominated by surface water flows. Unlike many coastal springs rivers, such as the Homosassa and Crystal rivers, Gum Slough has a well-developed floodplain characterized by extensive seasonally and sometimes semipermanently inundated swamps. The floodplain vegetation associated with Gum Slough is similar to vegetation described for parts of the Withlacoochee River floodplain (SWFWMD 1997). Differences in vegetation classes along Gum Slough study corridor were measured using importance values (IVs) that were calculated using tree species density and basal area and subsequently provided a relative measure of species dominance (no units). Differences in species and species importance were significant between the 6 vegetation classes identified along Gum Slough (Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, p < 0.01). Six vegetation classes were characterized as wetland classes and a single upland class was identified.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Hydrology on Everglades Ridge And
    INFLUENCE OF HYDROLOGY ON EVERGLADES RIDGE AND SLOUGH SOIL TOPOGRAPHY By ERIC JORCZAK A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2006 Copyright 2006 by Eric Jorczak To the Florida Everglades: live long and prosper ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge all those who assisted me in the completion of my thesis. They include my supervisory committee chair (Mark Clark), and my supervisory committee members (Wiley Kitchens and Jim Jawitz). I would also like to thank Chris Lewis (the best Everglades plant collector this side of the Mississippi) and all other associates of the Wetland Biogeochemistry Laboratory. I extend special thanks to my parents and family who support me in many ways. Long days on the road and longer days amidst the Everglades merriment were shared with many field workers, with much of the help from Charles “MacGyver” Campbell. Lastly, I thank my research site, the Everglades, for providing generally favorable field conditions. Reliable field instruments allowed this project to be completed in a relatively low-blood-pressure fashion. This research was funded by the Critical Ecosystem Studies Initiative, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Slough Reserve Brochure and Trail
    institutions. Bookstore and more. and Bookstore shows how the environment responds to the changes. the to responds environment the how shows fi eld trips, often in partnership with other training training other with partnership in often trips, eld fi purchases at the Friends of South Slough Slough South of Friends the at purchases habitat has been restored, continued monitoring monitoring continued restored, been has habitat publications, and offers workshops, conferences or or conferences workshops, offers and publications, of South Slough and receive discounts on on discounts receive and Slough South of help scientists understand what to do. After a natural natural a After do. to what understand scientists help Slough provides technical consulting, develops develops consulting, technical provides Slough of the estuary and forest. Join the Friends Friends the Join forest. and estuary the of monitoring before a restoration project begins can can begins project restoration a before monitoring professionals whose decisions affect the coast. South South coast. the affect decisions whose professionals glimpses of the past, and spectacular views views spectacular and past, the of glimpses streams and tidal channels, as well as species. Careful Careful species. as well as channels, tidal and streams managers, elected offi cials, community leaders and and leaders community cials, offi elected managers, Slough Interpretive Center for fascinating fascinating for Center Interpretive Slough Researchers are learning to restore salt marshes, marshes, salt restore to learning are Researchers The Coastal Training Program assists resource resource assists Program Training Coastal The history and coastal ecology. Visit the South South the Visit ecology. coastal and history 4,800 acres of land and water are a living laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • PMSD Wetlands Curriculum
    WWEETTLLAANNDDSS CCUURRRRIICCUULLUUMM POCONO MOUNTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This curriculum was funded through a grant from Pennsylvania’s Growing Greener Program administered through the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. The grant was awarded to the Tobyhanna Creek/Tunkhannock Creek Watershed Association to support ongoing watershed resource protection. The views herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. Special appreciation is extended to the Pocono Mountain School District, especially Mr. Thomas Knorr, Science Supervisor, and Dr. David Krauser, Superintendent of Schools for their support of and commitment to this project. Project partners responsible for this project include: a Pocono Mountain School District a Tobyhanna Creek/Tunkhannock Creek Watershed Association a Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection a The Nature Conservancy Science Office a Monroe County Planning Commission a F. X. Browne, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 WETLANDS – WHAT ARE THY EXACTLY? 2 WETLAND TYPES 4 WETLANDS CLASSIFICATION 7 PENNSYLVANIA WETLANDS 13 THE THREE H’S: HYDROLOGY, HYDRIC SOILS, AND HYDROPHYTES 15 ARE WETLANDS IMPORTANT? 19 THE FUNCTIONS AND VALUES OF WETLANDS 20 WETLANDS PROTECTION 22 DETERMINING THE WETLANDS BOUNDARY 26 TOBYHANNA CREEK/TUNKANNOCK CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION 28 REFERENCES 30 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #1 – TEST YOUR WETLAND IQ: WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT WETLANDS????? HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #2 – USING PLANT IDENTIFICATION GUIDES HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #3 – POSITION PAPER FIELD STUDY #1 – FORESTED WETLANDS FIELD STUDY #2 – THE BOG APPENDIX A – PLANT PHOTOGRAPHS – BOG SITE APPENDIX B – PLANT KEYS – BOG SITE APPENDIX C – WETLANDS DELINEATION FIELD DATA SHEETS APPENDIX D – BOG SITE FIELD DATA SHEETS APPENDIX E – GLOSSARY OF TERMS INTRODUCTION Wetlands have not always been a subject of study.
    [Show full text]