Regulate Trade in Rare Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regulate Trade in Rare Plants COMMENT HEALTH The autism BIOGRAPHY The man who ENERGY Don’t depend on the EQUALITY Why women win and anti-vaccine turned natural history into end of coal supplies to cut fewer scholarly awards and saga explored p.468 an explanatory science p.470 emissions p.472 what to do about it p.472 ewer than ten cabbage-on-a-stick plants (Brighamia insignis) are all K. GEHLE K. that remain of the wild population in FHawaii. Yet for US$29.99, anyone could buy the succulent at online auction. Thanks to loosely regulated Internet commerce and efficient shipping, people are increasingly obtaining endangered or threatened plants, legally and illegally, and moving them outside their native ranges. The introduction of non-native plant species causes ecological and economic harm — at an estimated cost of more than $30 billion a year in the United States alone1 — by damaging crops, pastures and ecosys- tems. For example, the Australian paperbark tree (Melaleuca spp.) is a noxious weed in the United States, causing millions of dol- lars of damage, even “People are though its habitats are increasingly considered threatened in Australia owing obtaining to coastal develop- endangered ment2. Moreover, the or threatened trade in endangered plants, legally plants can severely and illegally, affect wild popula- and moving tions by introducing them outside plant pathogens or their native increasing wild-plant range.” harvesting. In the 1980s, for example, the export of more than 60 million wild bulbs a year from Turkey to the Netherlands significantly depleted wild populations of several rare Turkish species, including snowdrops (Galanthus spp.) and cyclamen (Cyclamen spp.)3. Environmental agencies and governing bodies must better enforce existing species- To aid conservation of the species, volunteers legally plant a Florida torreya outside its historical range. protection laws, and establish legal frame- works to monitor and manage this rising tide of species redistribution. SELLING OUT Regulate trade Last year, we searched through thousands of websites containing the phrases ‘seeds for sale’ or ‘plants for sale’ to determine how many of the 753 plants listed as threatened in rare plants and endangered under the US Endangered Species Act can be purchased online. We Patrick D. Shirey and Gary A. Lamberti call found that nearly 10% are being sold or at least advertised online and are available for for action to stem the rising tide of species in-state purchase. Most of these sales are redistribution caused by Internet sales. illegal: of the more than 50 sellers we 27 JANUARY 2011 | VOL 469 | NATURE | 465 © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved COMMENT A found offering to ship plants between between states (as well as sales within them) strains being transferred haven’t grown in P L states, just four had the appropriate interstate become increasingly difficult to control. these sites, but they are expected to flourish T/F commerce permit issued by the US Fish and Ultimately, state laws may have a bigger under climate change7. R TUA S . Wildlife Service (FWS), which costs $100, effect on trade than federal law, but these In the United States, the FWS allows T . & . involves minimal paperwork and can be vary widely, with most being more lenient biologists to conduct assisted colonization C obtained in three months. towards commerce than the federal law5. of animals only if they can demonstrate that LAMY; LAMY; About half the endangered plants avail- Although some states such as Connecticut a species’ original habitat has been altered A S/ R able to buyers in the United States are sold strictly regulate commerce, 25 states, includ- irreversibly. Such restrictions don’t apply to E W 4 O in states outside their native range. Some ing Alabama, Arkansas, West Virginia and plants . B are even sold overseas. For example, the Wyoming, lack laws protecting endangered Several individuals and citizen groups star cactus (Astrophytum asterias) is found species or allow trade without restriction, have already begun to apply the approach to in only a few locations meaning that collection, trade and redistri- rare plant species. The Torreya Guardians, L.COM; R. & N. & R. L.COM; P in Texas and Mexico, bution can go unchecked. for example, a group of volunteers including E “The R but cultivars can be botanists and professional conservationists ATU purchasers N / of rare and bought online from A HELPING HAND largely based in Florida, Georgia, North D TE I at least six states and Most online shoppers seem to be amateur Carolina and South Carolina, have been M I endangered L several countries, horticulturalists seeking flowers for their cultivating seedlings of the Florida torreya plants include UN those trying including China, gardens. But anecdotal evidence from online since 2005, and planting them outside the SUALS SUALS Japan, Australia, the forums suggests that the purchasers of rare plant’s formally described historical range I to protect United Kingdom and and endangered plants increasingly include (although the Torreya Guardians argue that them.” V LAMY; Canada. those trying to protect them. the species may have thrived there during A / Part of the problem Assisted colonization — the movement the last peak interglacial warm period8). H GMB is the failure to enforce existing laws. It is of species or genetic subtypes to non-native It is highly unlikely that the US Congress E IF L also relatively easy for sellers to exploit weak environments where they are expected to will change the law on the transport of listed D links in the current legislation. thrive — has been proposed by conserva- species between states, in part because alter- L ; WI ; A P Under federal law, the FWS can regulate tionists as a way to preserve species at risk of ing environmental legislation takes such an L /F R sales between states but not within them. extinction. This idea has grown in popular- enormous bipartisan effort. (Also, people E K O For example, it is legal to sell the endangered ity worldwide as the effects of climate change have been free to move privately owned R EB Florida torreya (Torreya taxifolia) within have become more apparent, and scientists plants around for thousands of years.) G South Carolina even though the native range have begun to investigate where and when However, the FWS can tighten trade restric- /IMA of the plant is in Florida and Georgia. If a assisted colonization might work6. For tions without waiting for the government to R plant’s distribution expands through illegal instance, for the past two years, foresters in change the Endangered Species Act. sales, however, more sellers are likely to start British Columbia, Canada, have been mov- The agency should work with legitimate offering it. Because it is legal to transplant ing seedlings of commercially harvested pine sellers to monitor the movement of plants and NUSSBAUME R. plants anywhere in the United States if they and hardwood species to nearly 50 experi- enforce existing legislation. As a first step, it are privately owned4, subsequent transfers mental reforestation sites. Historically, the should establish dedicated surveillance teams 466 | NATURE | VOL 469 | 27 JANUARY 2011 © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved COMMENT For sale online: the American lotus (far left) is This could further improve the survival of the the Convention on International Trade in listed as threatened or endangered in three wild plants by reducing poaching, or it could Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and states (Michigan, New Jersey and Pennsylvania) pose a significant risk if it infiltrates the his- Flora, are abided by10. but banned in Connecticut as potentially torical range of the Tennessee coneflower. Although the redistribution of plant invasive. The Tennessee coneflower, the Florida A thornier issue is how to regulate the species around the world is nothing new, the torreya, the star cactus, and the cabbage-on- trade and movement of plants in assisted- ease with which people can now obtain and a-stick plant (pictured from left to right) are all colonization efforts. The FWS and other transfer specimens is unprecedented. This, listed under the US Endangered Species Act. government agencies face an enormous combined with a growing interest in assisted challenge in trying to manage biodiver- colonization, makes it more important than to monitor online transactions; for instance, sity loss in the face of climate change with ever for federal and local governments low-cost automated search engines could inadequate resources. to wrest control of illegal Internet trade, trawl for species names along with phrases Individuals and citizen groups should not develop a policy for hybrids and ensure that such as ‘plants for sale’ or ‘add to cart’. take the lead on this because of the risks asso- genetic diversity is considered when propa- The agency could also restrict the ability of ciated with introducing any species. Instead, gating plants. ■ consumers to buy hybrids bred from endan- the FWS should carry out controlled pilot gered species. Currently, these are not formally studies first, possibly using the grass-roots Patrick D. Shirey and Gary A. Lamberti regulated9 — allowing breeders to cultivate resources of volunteers. The agency has are in the Department of Biological Sciences the unique characteristics of rare plants while begun to make moves in this direction. A at the University of Notre Dame, Notre evading endangered-species laws. Yet hybrids five-year review of its Florida torreya recov- Dame, Indiana 46556, USA. can have serious implications — good and bad ery plan includes a proposal to work with the e-mail: [email protected] — for the management of wild populations. Torreya Guardians on an assisted-coloniza- 1. Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. Ecol. Econ. Take the Tennessee coneflower (Echinacea tion project if other approaches fail. 52, 273–288 (2005).
Recommended publications
  • The Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society
    Volume 28: Number 1 > Winter/Spring 2011 PalmettoThe Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society Protecting Endangered Plants in Panhandle Parks ● Native or Not? Carica papaya ● Water Science & Plants Protecting Endangered Plant Species Sweetwater slope: Bill and Pam Anderson To date, a total of 117 listed taxa have been recorded in 26 panhandle parks, making these parks a key resource for the protection of endangered plant species. 4 ● The Palmetto Volume 28:1 ● Winter/Spring 2011 in Panhandle State Parks by Gil Nelson and Tova Spector The Florida Panhandle is well known for its natural endowments, chief among which are its botanical and ecological diversity. Approximately 242 sensitive plant taxa occur in the 21 counties west of the Suwannee River. These include 15 taxa listed as endangered or threatened by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 212 listed as endangered or threatened by the State of Florida, 191 tracked by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory, 52 candidates for federal listing, and 7 categorized by the state as commercially exploited. Since the conservation of threatened and endangered plant species depends largely on effective management of protected populations, the occurrence of such plants on publicly or privately owned conservation lands, coupled with institutional knowledge of their location and extent is essential. District 1 of the Florida Sarracenia rosea (purple pitcherplant) at Ponce de Leon Springs State Park: Park Service manages 33 state parks encompassing approximately Tova Spector, Florida Department of Environmental Protection 53,877 acres in the 18 counties from Jefferson County and the southwestern portion of Taylor County westward.
    [Show full text]
  • Torreya Taxifolia
    photograph © Abraham Rammeloo Torreya taxifolia produces seeds in 40 Kalmthout Arboretum ABRAHAM RAMMELOO, Curator of the Kalmthout Arboretum, writes about this rare conifer that recently produced seed for the first time. Torreya is a genus of conifers that comprises four to six species that are native to North America and Asia. It is closely related to Taxus and Cephalotaxus and is easily confused with the latter. However, it is relatively easy to distinguish them apart by their leaves. Torreya has needles with, on the underside, two small edges with stomas giving it a green appearance; Cephalotaxus has different rows of stomas, and for this reason the underside is more of a white colour. It is very rare to find Torreya taxifolia in the wild; it is native to a small area in Florida and Georgia. It grows in steep limestone cliffs along the Apalachicola River. These trees come from a warm and humid climate where the temperature in winter occasionally falls below freezing. They grow mainly on north-facing slopes between Fagus grandifolia, Liriodendron tulipifera, Acer barbatum, Liquidambar styraciflua and Quercus alba. They can grow up to 15 to 20 m high. The needles are sharp and pointed and grow in a whorled pattern along the branches. They are 25 to 35 mm long and stay on the tree for three to four years. If you crush them, they give off a strong, sharp odour. The health and reproduction of the adult population of this species suffered INTERNATIONAL DENDROLOGY SOCIETY TREES Opposite Torreya taxifolia ‘Argentea’ growing at Kalmthout Arboretum in Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS of TORREYA (TAXACEAE) INFERRED from SEQUENCES of NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA ITS REGION Author(S): Jianhua Li, Charles C
    PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF TORREYA (TAXACEAE) INFERRED FROM SEQUENCES OF NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA ITS REGION Author(s): Jianhua Li, Charles C. Davis, Michael J. Donoghue, Susan Kelley and Peter Del Tredici Source: Harvard Papers in Botany, Vol. 6, No. 1 (July 2001), pp. 275-281 Published by: Harvard University Herbaria Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41761652 Accessed: 14-06-2016 15:35 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41761652?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Harvard University Herbaria is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Harvard Papers in Botany This content downloaded from 128.103.224.4 on Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:35:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF TORREYA (TAXACEAE) INFERRED FROM SEQUENCES OF NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA ITS REGION Jianhua Li,1 Charles C. Davis,2 Michael J. Donoghue,3 Susan Kelley,1 And Peter Del Tredici1 Abstract. Torreya, composed of five to seven species, is distributed disjunctly in eastern Asia and the eastern and western United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusarium Torreyae (Sp
    HOST RANGE AND BIOLOGY OF FUSARIUM TORREYAE (SP. NOV), CAUSAL AGENT OF CANKER DISEASE OF FLORIDA TORREYA (TORREYA TAXIFOLIA ARN.) By AARON J. TRULOCK A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2012 1 © 2012 Aaron J. Trulock 2 To my wife, for her support, patience, and dedication 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my chair, Jason Smith, and committee members, Jenny Cruse-Sanders and Patrick Minogue, for their guidance, encouragement, and boundless knowledge, which has helped me succeed in my graduate career. I would also like to thank the Forest Pathology lab for aiding and encouraging me in both my studies and research. Research is not an individual effort; it’s a team sport. Without wonderful teammates it would never happen. Finally, I would like to that the U.S. Forest Service for their financial backing, as well as, UF/IFAS College of Agriculture and Life Science for their matching funds. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 6 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 7 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... 8
    [Show full text]
  • D. Bruce Means
    D. Bruce Means Scientific and Technical Publications, Popular Articles, and Contract Reports 1. Means, D. Bruce and Clive J. Longden. 1970. Observations on the occurrence of Desmognathus monticola in Florida. Herpetologica 26(4):396-399. 2. Means, D. Bruce. 1971. Dentitional morphology in desmognathine salamanders (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). Association of Southeastern Biologists Bulletin 18(2):45. (Abstr.) 3. Means, D. Bruce. 1972a. Notes on the autumn breeding biology of Ambystoma cingulatum (Cope) (Amphibia: Urodela: Ambystomatidae). Association of Southeastern Biologists Bulletin 19(2):84. (Abstr.) 4. Means, D. Bruce. 1972b. Osteology of the skull and atlas of Amphiuma pholeter Neill (Amphibia: Urodela: Amphiumidae). Association of Southeastern Biologists Bulletin 19(2):84. (Abstr.) 5. Hobbs, Horton H., Jr. and D. Bruce Means. 1972c. Two new troglobitic crayfishes (Decapoda, Astacidae) from Florida. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 84(46):393-410. 6. Means, D. Bruce. 1972d. Comments on undivided teeth in urodeles. Copeia 1972(3):386-388. 7. Means, D. Bruce. 1974a. The status of Desmognathus brimleyorum Stejneger and an analysis of the genus Desmognathus in Florida. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences, 18(1):1-100. 8. Means, D. Bruce. 1974b. City of Tallahassee Powerline Project: Faunal Impact Study. Report under contract with the City of Tallahassee, Florida, 198 pages. (Contract report.) 9. Means, D. Bruce. 1974c. A survey of the amphibians, reptiles and mammals inhabiting St. George Island, Franklin County, Florida with comments on vulnerable aspects of their ecology. 21 pages in R. J. Livingston and N. M. Thompson, editors. Field and laboratory studies concerning effects of various pollutants on estuarine and coastal organisms with application to the management of the Apalachicola Bay system (North Florida, U.S.A.).
    [Show full text]
  • The Population Biology of Torreya Taxifolia: Habitat Evaluation, Fire Ecology, and Genetic Variability
    I LLINOI S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007. The Population Biology of Torreya taxifolia: Habitat Evaluation, Fire Ecology, and Genetic Variability Mark W. Schwartz and Sharon M. Hermann Center for Biodiversity Technical Report 1992(Z) Illinois Natural History Survey 607 E. Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 Tall Timbers, Inc. Route 1, Box 678 Tallahassee, Florida 32312 Prepared for Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission Nongame Wildlife Section 620 S. Meridian Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1600 Project Completion Report NG89-030 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Chapter 1: Species background and hypotheses for.......5 the decline of Torreya taxifolia, species Background ....... .. .6 Hypotheses for the Decline........0 Changes in the Biotic Environment ...... 10 Changes in the Abiotic Environment ..... 13 Discu~ssion *0o ** eg. *.*. 0 0*.0.*09 6 0 o**** o*...21 Chapter 2: The continuing decline of Torreyap iola....2 Study.Area and Methods ooo................25 Results * ** ** ** ** ** ** .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .30 Chapter 3: Genetic variability in Torreya taxif-olia......4 Methods.......................* 0 C o490 0 Results . ...... *oe*.........o51 -0L-icmion *.. ~ 0000 00000@55 Management _Recommendations .000000000000.0.60 Chapter 4: The light relations of Tgr .taz'ifgli with ..... 62 special emphasis on the relationship to growth and,,disease- Methods o..............0.0.0.0.0.00.eoo63 Light and Growth . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .64 Measurements'-of photosynthetic rates 0,.65 Light and Growth . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .69 Measurements of photosynthetic rates ..71. Discussion......... *0* * * * * * * ** . 81 Chapter 5: The foliar fungal associates of Torreya............85 ta ifola: pathogenicity and susceptibility to smoke Methods 0 0 0..
    [Show full text]
  • Torreya State Park – Brochure
    Florida State Parks History & Nature Florida Department of Environmental Protection The high bluffs overlooking the Apalachicola River Division of Recreation and Parks make Torreya State Park one of Florida’s most scenic places. With steep bluffs rising more than Torreya State Park Torreya 150 feet above the river, the park is named after 2576 N.W. Torreya Park Road an extremely rare species of Torreya tree. Bristol, Florida 32321 Northwest State Park (850) 643-2674 Florida In the 1800s the Apalachicola River was an FloridaStateParks.org important interstate highway, when General Andrew Jackson crossed this river with his One of Florida’s most scenic places army. More than 200 steamboats traveled the Park Guidelines Apalachicola River. After Florida became a U.S. • Hours are 8 a.m. until sunset, 365 days a year. territory, the first government road, constructed • An entrance fee is required. in 1828 across north Florida, met the river here • All plants, animals and park property are in the park. protected. Collection, destruction or disturbance is prohibited. The Gregory House originally sat across the river • Pets are permitted in designated areas only. at Ocheesee Landing, was built around 1849 by Pets must be kept on a leash no longer than six planter Jason Gregory. After the Civil War and feet and well behaved at all times. the abolition of slavery the plantation declined. • Fishing, boating and fires are allowed in The Gregory House was abandoned in 1935 and designated areas only. A Florida fishing license donated to the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC). may be required. It was then dismantled, moved across the river • Fireworks and hunting are prohibited in all and re-constructed in its current location.
    [Show full text]
  • Torreya Taxifolia Florida Torreya1 Edward F
    Fact Sheet ST-644 October 1994 Torreya taxifolia Florida Torreya1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION This upright, pyramidal, evergreen tree has fine- textured, drooping branches armed with sharp-pointed, needle-like, glossy, dark green leaves (Fig. 1). The leaves give off a strong odor of turpentine (or tomato plant) when crushed. Florida Torreya can reach a height of 40 feet with a 20-foot spread and has a slow growth rate. It is native to the wooded slopes and ravines along the eastern bank of the Appalachicola River in western Florida and is extremely rare in the wild. More widespread use of this native tree will help save it from extinction. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: Torreya taxifolia Pronunciation: TOR-ee-uh tack-sih-FOLE-ee-uh Common name(s): Florida Torreya, Stinking Yew Family: Taxaceae USDA hardiness zones: 8 through 9 (Fig. 2) Origin: native to North America Uses: specimen; no proven urban tolerance Availability: grown in small quantities by a small number of nurseries DESCRIPTION Figure 1. Young Florida Torreya. Height: 10 to 20 feet Spread: 15 to 25 feet Foliage Crown uniformity: irregular outline or silhouette Crown shape: pyramidal Leaf arrangement: alternate (Fig. 3) Crown density: moderate Leaf type: simple Growth rate: slow Leaf margin: entire Texture: fine 1. This document is adapted from Fact Sheet ST-644, a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Publication date: October 1994. 2. Edward F. Gilman, associate professor, Environmental Horticulture Department; Dennis G. Watson, associate professor, Agricultural Engineering Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32611.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Time Lags: Lessons from Pleistocene Ecology
    10 Deep Time Lags: Lessons from Pleistocene Ecology Connie Barlow Scientists involved in Gaian research—also known as geophysiology, Earth systems science, or whole-Earth science—as a matter of course provision their global climate and chemical cycling models with their best understandings of time lags inherent in Earth’s thermal and chemical reservoirs. For example, how long will it take the carbonic acid content of the world’s oceans to equilibrate with today’s (and tomorrow’s) elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? Time lags are just as important to understand for biodiversity preser- vation. New forms of population modeling help conservation biologists estimate the probabilities that a particular population (of any given size) of plant or animal will “wink out” owing to fl uctuations in natural conditions—even if the population seems to be self-maintaining in the present. Such models have served as wake-up calls to conservationists that even stabilized populations of threatened species may be doomed to extirpation unless their numbers can be increased or corridors established to facilitate cross migration with neighboring populations. Another kind of time lag also impinges on biodiversity preservation. This time lag has come to the attention of conservation biologists, thanks to the work of those who specialize in Pleistocene ecology. In the late 1970s ecologist Dan Janzen, working in Costa Rica, began to suspect that his studies of seed dispersal in the large-seeded, fruit-bearing plants had gone awry. The studies were fl awed by the then-unexamined (and universal) assumption that dispersal candidates could include only those fruit- or seed-eating mammals that currently were native to the plant’s home range—or that had likely been there just prior to the arrival of Europeans in the Western Hemisphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Outlook for Florida's Threatened, Endangered, and At
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conservation Outlook For Florida’s Threatened, Endangered, and At-risk Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Outlook for Florida Ecological Services Offices 1339 20th Street Florida’s Threatened, Endangered, Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 September 2015 and At-risk Species A snail kite prepares to eat an apple snail. These raptors use their curved beaks to pull their primary prey, apple snails, from their shells. Photo: © Kevan and Linda Sunderland The Mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conservation Outlook For Florida’s Threatened, Endangered, and At-risk Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conservation Outlook for Florida Ecological Services Offices 1339 20th Street Florida’s Threatened, Endangered, Vero Beach, FL 32960-3559 September 2015 and At-risk Species A snail kite prepares to eat an apple snail. These raptors use their curved beaks to pull their primary prey, apple snails, from their shells. Photo: © Kevan and Linda Sunderland The Mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. Contents State Supervisor’s Foreword State Supervisor’s Foreword....................... 3 Introduction ..................................... 5 Threats to Conservation in Florida ................ 8 Florida’s beauty and mild climate are enjoyed by 19 million residents—a number growing rapidly as 1,000 Recently Extinct Species .........................
    [Show full text]
  • 0313000408 Chattahoochee River-Lake Seminole HUC 8 Watershed: Lower Chattahoochee
    Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report HUC 10 Watershed: 0313000408 Chattahoochee River-Lake Seminole HUC 8 Watershed: Lower Chattahoochee Counties: Early, Seminole Major Waterbodies (in GA): Chattahoochee River, Lake Seminole Federal Listed Species: (historic, known occurrence, or likely to occur in the watershed) E - Endangered, T - Threatened, C - Candidate, CCA - Candidate Conservation species, PE - Proposed Endangered, PT - Proposed Threatened, Pet - Petitioned, R - Rare, U - Uncommon, SC - Species of Concern. Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) US: T; GA: E Potential Range (county); Survey period: early May Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) US: E; GA: E Potential Range (county); Survey period: habitat any time of year or foraging individuals: 1 Apr - 31 May. Reticulated Flatwoods Salamander (Ambystoma bishopi) US: E; GA: E Potential Range (county); Survey period: for larvae 15 Feb - 15 Mar. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi) US: T; GA: T Potential Range (model); Survey period: 1 Nov - 31 Mar. American Chaffseed (Schwalbea americana) US: E; GA: E Occurrence; Survey period: flowering 1 Apr - 30 Jun. Fringed Campion (Silene polypetala) US: E; GA: E Potential Range (county); Survey period: flowering late Feb - 31 May. Use of a nearby reference site to more accurately determine local flowering period is recommended. Florida Torreya (Torreya taxifolia) US: E; GA: E Potential Range (county); Survey period: year round. Updated: 2/9/2021 0313000408 Chattahoochee River-Lake Seminole 1 Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report HUCFederal 10 Candidate,Watershed :Candidate Conservation, or Petitioned Species: (likely or known to occur in the watershed) Eastern Diamondback Rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus) US: Pet Historic Occurrence; Surveys are best conducted April - November.
    [Show full text]
  • Managed Relocation: Integrating the Scientific, Regulatory, and Ethical Challenges Author(S): Mark W
    Managed Relocation: Integrating the Scientific, Regulatory, and Ethical Challenges Author(s): Mark W. Schwartz, Jessica J. Hellmann, Jason M. Mclachlan, Dov F. Sax, Justin O. Borevitz, Jean Brennan, Alejandro E. Camacho, Gerardo Ceballos, Jamie R. Clark, Holly Doremus, Regan Early, Julie R. Etterson, Dwight Fielder, Jacquelyn L. Gill, Patrick Gonzalez, Nancy Green, Lee Hannah, Dale W. Jamieson, Debra Javeline, Ben A. Minteer, Jay Odenbaugh, Stephen Polasky, David M. Richardson, Terry L. Root, Hugh D. Safford, Osvaldo Sala, Stephen H. Schneider, Andrew R. Thompson, John W. Williams, Mark Vellend, Pati Vitt and Sandra Zellmer Source: BioScience, 62(8):732-743. 2012. Published By: American Institute of Biological Sciences URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.6 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Articles Managed Relocation: Integrating the Scientific, Regulatory, and Ethical Challenges MARK W.
    [Show full text]