arXiv:1303.5013v1 [astro-ph.IM] 20 Mar 2013 .V Melekhin, V. M. .S Gvamichava, S. A. .N Likhacheva, N. L. .B Kreisman, B. B. .H Cannon, H. W. .H Sondaar, H. L. u .Kovalev, A. Yu. .Giovannini, G. .A Preston, A. R. .Schmidt, A. .I Zhuravlev, I. V. .Y.Nikolaev, Ya. N. .N Fomina, N. A. .I Vasil’kov, I. V. .S Kardashev, S. N. .I Slysh, I. V. 7 RDOSRN EECP IHASZ F3000KM: 000 300 OF SIZE A WITH TELESCOPE A — “RADIOASTRON” .M Antonov, M. N. u .Aleksandrov, A. Yu. .V Ipatov, V. A. rmaC on tc opn,6 l sasaa 015 Niz 603105, Osharskaya, ul. 67 Company, Stock Joint Vremya-Ch .E Bubnov, E. A. .Urpo, S. .G Belousov, G. K. .Rocha, P. ANPRMTR N IS BEVTOA RESULTS OBSERVATIONAL FIRST AND PARAMETERS MAIN .A Konovalenko, A. A. .V Shatskaya, V. M. .N Pashchenko, N. I. .K Semenov, K. S. 4 in erwv ai eecp,Tt nttt fFundamen of Institute Tata Telescope, Radio Metrewave Giant 9 pc eerhIsiue usa cdm fSine,Mosc Sciences, of Academy Russian Institute, Research Space 38 25 1 1 4u.Lnnrdky,Kik,Mso ein 440 Russ 141400, region, Moscow Khimki, Leningradskaya, ul. 24 10 6 sr pc etr eee hsclIsiue ocw Russ Moscow, Institute, Physical Lebedev Center, Space Astro 8 29 32 6 17 16, .D Fedorchuk, D. S. 13 ..6 aaaga,TlJna,Pn,Mhrsta India Maharashtra, Pune, Tal-Junnar, Narayangoan, 6, P.B. .A Shnyreva, A. L. 1 .I Smirnov, I. A. 41 ascuet nttt fTcnlg,Cmrde A USA MA, Cambridge, Technology, of Institute Massachusetts 4Lnnrdky,Kik,Mso ein 440 Russia 141400, region, Moscow Khimki, Leningradskaya, 24 1, .A Stepan’yants, A. V. 20 1 .A Rudakov, A. V. 1 1 .Y.Kukushkin, Yu. A. 1 6 .V Menderov, V. A. .G Larionov, G. M. 1 .N Pyshnov, N. V. ∗ u .Khapin, B. Yu. 9 ehrad nttt o ai srnm (ASTRON), Astronomy Radio for Institute Netherlands .J Wellington, J. K. .P Lobanov, P. A. .S Zaslavskii, S. G. 1 1 .A Girin, A. I. .Z Kanevskii, Z. B. .O o ,79 ADiglo h Netherlands The Dwingeloo, AA 7990 2, Box O. P. .S Novikov, S. B. .Y Kovalev, Y. Y. 10 .S Burgin, S. M. .L Jauncey, L. D. 1 .I Artyukhov, I. M. .V Khartov, V. V. 5 2 bevtied ecae,Nuhtl Switzerland Neuchatel, Neuchatel, de Observatoire aohi cetfi n rdcinAssociation, Production and Scientific Lavochkin aohi cetfi n rdcinAssociation, Production and Scientific Lavochkin 3 usa cdm fSine,Mso,Russia Moscow, Sciences, of Academy Russian .A Belyaev, A. A. 5 1 nttt fRdoTcnlg n Electronics, and Technology Radio of Institute 1 .A Serebrennikov, A. V. 1 .Y.Shapirovskaya, Ya. N. 11 27 .Ananthakrishnan, S. u .Pomomarev, N. Yu. au-7PiaeJitSokCompany, Stock Joint Private Salut-27 .D Kopelyanskii, D. G. 1 1 1 .G Smith, G. J. .I Gurvits, I. L. 1 1 .V Shpilevskii, V. V. 1 9 1 25 .M Finkel’shtein, M. A. ,1 9, 1 5 ,25 1, .R¨ais¨anen,A. 18 .A Rakhimov, A. I. 22 .S Tsarevskii, S. G. .M Lisakov, M. M. 1 .Busca, G. 12 .W Murphy, W. D. 2 22 9 .V Logvinenko, V. S. 7 .D Novikov, D. I. .A Knorin, A. I. .E Dewdney, E. P. .V Abramov, V. V. .V Zakhvatkin, V. M. 5 .F Kulishenko, F. V. .S Vinogradov, S. I. .S Turygin, S. M. .V Kovalenko, V. A. .J Berulis, J. J. srnm eot,21,Vl 7 o ,p.153–194. pp. 3, No. 57, Vol. 2013, Reports, Astronomy .Baan, W. 13 5 4 15 14, 10 4 1 1 .A Soglasnov, A. V. .T Schilizzi, T. R. 35 .V Andreyanov, V. V. 1 .V Popov, V. M. .A Bykadorov, A. A. .I Sheikhet, I. A. 6 u .Korneev, A. Yu. .V Sazankov, V. S. .D Dagkesamanskii, D. R. 1 20 1 .G Babakin, G. N. 20 13 1 1 1 .L Casse, L. J. .N Litvinenko, N. L. 19 .D Ekers, D. R. .V Oreshko, V. V. 37 .F Burke, F. B. .A Mizyakina, A. T. .M Rozhkov, M. V. 3 .A Zensus, A. J. 20 1 1 27 .Y.Avdeev, Yu. V. .A D’yakov, A. A. 1 .Y.Turygin, Yu. S. .Langston, G. 22 .B Fomalont, B. E. .Wietfeldt, R. .L Kogan, L. B. ..Cooper, D.N. .N Zinov’ev, N. A. 1 36 5 .Pravin-Kumar, A. 1 14 .P Skulachev, P. D. .E Shirshakov, E. A. .V Sokolovskii, V. K. 18 11 1 1 niNvoo,Russia Novgorod, hnii 8 1 1 .I Kellermann, I. K. 25 .A Sakharov, A. B. .I Kostenko, I. V. .V Biryukov, V. A. .E Babyshkin, E. V. n .E Yakimov E. V. and 1 .S Andrianov, S. A. .S Bychkova, S. V. a Research, tal 31 w Russia ow, 33 .A Chuprikov, A. A. 30 u .Pavlenko, K. Yu. 13 26 1 20 1 37 .Y.Medvedev, Yu. S. 28 .D Romney, D. J. .F Likhachev, F. S. u .Mozgovoi, V. Yu. .V Alakoz, V. A. 39 1 .A Voitsik, A. P. .V Komaev, V. R. .E Zharov, E. V. ia .G Tuchin, G. A. ia .M Kut’kin, M. A. 1 .D’Addario, L. .Fejes, I. u Ilinen, Yu. 9 4 5 1 40 ,21 1, 7 1 24 1 5 1 23 1 1 34 1 21 7 1 22 5 1 13 1 7 5 2

Research and Production Enterprise, 603105, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia 12Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO Division of Radio Physics, Sydney, Australia 13NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91011, USA 14Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe, Postbus 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands 15Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Kluyerveg 1, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands 16INAF-Istituto di Radioastronomia di Bologna, Via Gobetti 101, I-40129 Bologna, Italy 17Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universita di Bologna, via Zamboni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy 18Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, P.O. Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia 19SKA Program Development Office, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom 20Institute of Applied Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia 21Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 22Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miusskaya 4, Moscow, 125047, Russia 23Ilinen Company, Helsinki, Finland 24National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Edgemont Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475, USA 25Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy, 69 Auf dem H¨ugel, 53121 Bonn, Germany 26Moscow Energy Institute, Moscow, Russia 27Radio Astronomy Institute, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 4 Krasnoznamennaya, Khar’kov, 61002 Ukraine 28CSIRO Information and Communication Technologies, Sydney, Australia 29Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada 30Radio Astronomy Institute, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 4 ul. Krasnoznamennaya, Khar’kov, 61002 Ukraine 31National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P. O. Box 2, Rt. 28/92, Green Bank, WV 24944-0002, USA 32Lavochkin Scientific and Production Association, 24 ul. ul. Leningradskaya, Khimki, Moscow region, 141400, Russia 33Raketno-Kosmicheskie Sistemy, ul. Aviamotornaya, d. 53, Moscow 111250, Russia 34National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P. O. Box 0, 1003 Lopezville Rd., Socorro, NM 87801-7000, USA 35Department of Radio Science and Engineering, Aalto University, P. O. Box 13000, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland 36University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom 37Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Mokhovaya 11-7, Moscow, 125009, Russia 3

38Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland 39National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Edgmont Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475, USA 40FOMI¨ Satellite Geodetic Obsevatory, Renc, Hungary 41Radiosvyaz, Private Joint Stock Company, ul. Vaneeva, d. 34, kv. 21, 603105, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia (Received 5 July 2012; Accepted 12 July 2012) The Russian Academy of Sciences and Federal Space Agency, together with the participation of many international organizations, worked toward the launch of the RadioAstron orbiting space observatory with its onboard 10-m reflector radio tele- scope from the Baikonur cosmodrome on July 18, 2011. Together with some of the largest ground-based radio telescopes and a set of stations for tracking, collecting, and reducing the data obtained, this space radio telescope forms a multi-antenna ground–space radio interferometer with extremely long baselines, making it possible for the first time to study various objects in the Universe with angular resolutions a million times better than is possible with the human eye. The project is targeted at systematic studies of compact radio-emitting sources and their dynamics. Objects to be studied include supermassive black holes, accretion disks, and relativistic jets in active galactic nuclei, stellar-mass black holes, neutron stars and hypothetical quark stars, regions of formation of stars and planetary systems in our and other galaxies, interplanetary and interstellar plasma, and the gravitational field of the Earth. The results of ground-based and inflight tests of the space radio telescope carried out in both autonomous and ground–space interferometric regimes are reported. The derived characteristics are in agreement with the main requirements of the project. The astrophysical science program has begun.

1. INTRODUCTION dio astronomers in the USSR and USA in 1969, using the 43-m Green Bank radio tele- scope (USA) and the 22-m Simeiz telescope A method for obtaining very high angu- (USSR) [9, 10]. Such observations were sub- lar resolution in radio astronomy and a spe- sequently carried out between all continents. cific scheme for the realization of this method Modern trans-continental radio interferome- are presented in [1–3]. It was noted that ra- ters can achieve angular resolutions of frac- dio interferometers on Earth and in space tions of a milliarcsecond (mas). These ob- could operate with very long baselines be- servations show that most active galactic nu- tween antennas, with independent registra- clei (AGNs) possess unresolved components, tion of the signals at each antenna. Such even on the longest projected ground base- radio interferometers were first operated in lines (approximately 10 000 km); see, e.g., 1967 in Canada [4] and the USA [5]. The first [11, 12] and references therein. trans-continental interferometers were real- The possibility of creating space interfer- ized in 1968–1969, between telescopes in the ometers was discussed at a scientific session of USA and Sweden [6], and also between the the Division of General Physics and Astron- Deep Space Network antennas in the USA omy of the USSR Academy of Sciences on De- and Australia [7, 8]. Some of the first ob- cember 23, 1970 [13]. The first Earth–Space servations with trans-continental radio inter- interferometer projects emerged at that time. ferometers were carried out jointly by ra- In the 1970s, the Space Research Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences (IKI) working ∗Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] jointly with industrial partners created the 4

first space radio telescope (SRT), which had The first successful space interferometer a 10-m diameter reflector. This telescope had was realized in 1986–1988 using the 5-m di- a trussed, opening construction with a retic- ameter antenna of the NASA TDRSS geo- ulated reflecting surface and receivers tuned stationary satellite (USA), which operated at to 12 and 72 cm. This radio telescope was 2 and 13 cm, together with several ground- delivered to the Salyut-6 manned orbital sta- based radio telescopes [17, 18]. The first tion by the cargo ship Progress in Summer SRT specially designed for interferometry was 1979, where it was tested using astronomical the HALCA satellite of the VSOP project, objects with the participation of the cosmo- launched by Japan in 1997 [19, 20]. This 8-m nauts V.A. Lyakhov and V.V. Ryumin [14, diameter antenna was mounted on a satel- 15]. One of the outcomes of these experi- lite that orbited the Earth in an elliptical ments was the decision to use a rigid reflect- orbit with a period of 6.3 hr and a maxi- ing surface for the RadioAstron project. mum distance from the center of the Earth of 28 000 km. This SRT successfully functioned A decree of the Council of Ministers of at wavelengths of 6 and 18 cm until 2003. the USSR announcing the development of six Both of these space interferometers confirmed spacecraft for astrophysical investigations at not only the possibility, but also the scien- the Lavochkin Scientific and Production As- tific necessity of further developing ground– sociation was made in 1980. These included space radio Very Long Baseline Interferom- the decimeter- and centimeter-wavelength etry (VLBI), in particular of enhancing the interferometer RadioAstron (the Spektr-R angular resolution obtained by increasing the project), as well as the millimeter and sub- size of the orbit and of expanding the range millimeter radio telescope Millimetron (the of wavelengths observed. All of this experi- Spektr-M project) [16]. The technical spec- ence was taken into account when preparing ifications for the RadioAstron project had al- the RadioAstron project. ready been prepared in 1979. The first in- ternational conference on this project took The RadioAstron SRT is a 10-m diameter place in Moscow on December 17-18, 1985. reflecting antenna equipped with a complex Agreements were signed, and an interna- of 1.35, 6.2, 18, and 92 cm receivers. A Nav- tional group concerned with the development igator module space platform was used to in- of onboard radio-astronomy receivers based stall the RadioAstron antenna and equipment on sets of individual technical specifications complex into the Spektr-R spacecraft [21–25]. was formed. These technical specifications The arrangement of the SRT and equipment were developed and issued in 1984–1985 by complex in the Navigator module is shown the Astrophysics Division of IKI, headed by in Fig. 11. A general block schematic of the I.S. Shklovskii. The group included special- antenna and equipment complex of the SRT ists from the USSR, the Netherlands, the is shown in Fig. 2. The precision carbon- Federal Republic of Germany, Australia, Fin- fiber panels of the main antenna of the SRT land, and India. In the early 1990s, the flight were manufactured and tested in Russia, and models of the first receivers at 1.35, 6.2, and then at the European Space Research and 18 cm and onboard blocks of input low-noise Technology Center (ESTEC) of the European amplifiers (LNAs) for the 92-cm receiver were Space Agency in 1994 (Nordwijk, the Nether- delivered to the Astro Space Center of the lands; Fig. 4a). Tests of the model SRT and Lebedev Physical Institute (ASC; formed in the equipment complex of the interferometer 1990 from the IKI Astrophysics Division and the Radio Astronomy Station of the Lebedev Physical Insitute in Pushchino). The 18-cm 1 All figures referred to in the Introduction (Figs. 1, receiver and 92-cm amplifier blocks form part 2, 4, 5, 7–10) are discussed in more detail in later of the complex of scientific equipment used sections of this paper. Figs. 4a–4l and Figs. 7a–7g with the RadioAstron SRT in flight today. are presented as color inserts. 5

(Fig. 4b) were carried out from Autumn 2003 signal, and beginning the Early Science Pro- through Summer 2004 at the Pushchino Ra- gram (ESP) of astrophysical investigations. dio Astronomy Observatory (PRAO) of the Let us now present a brief history of ASC. The main parameters of the model SRT key astronomical observations in the first were measured during these tests using ob- half year of the inflight tests of the SRT. servations of astronomical radio sources, and The radio-astronomy receivers were success- test observations in an interferometric regime fully turned on for the first time in mid- were carried out using the SRT together with September 2011, and regular tests of the on- the PRAO 22-m radio telescope. This 22- board scientific equipment were begun. Ra- m radio telescope was subsequently outfitted diometric measurements of the parameters with additional equipment enabling its use of the SRT using radio-astronomical meth- as a ground station for tracking the Spektr-R ods and observations of various astronomi- spacecraft in flight. The last ground tests of cal objects during operation of the SRT in the SRT with the Navigator module occured a single-dish regime began on September 27, at the Lavochkin Association (Figs. 4c,d). At 2011 (Figs. 7a, 7b, 8a–8c). The adjust- the suggestion of the International Grote Re- ment and testing of the high-data-rate ra- ber Foundation, a memorial plate with a por- dio channel for transmitting data between trait of the pioneer radio astronomer Grote the SRT and the ground tracking station in Reber (1911–2002) was installed on the SRT Pushchino in an interferometric regime were (Fig. 4e). A poster with an image of symbols conducted in parallel. Measurements at 92, of the organizations and countries participat- 18, 6.2, and 1.35 cm began with observa- ing in the RadioAstron project was placed tions of the Cassiopeia A supernova remnant on the fairing of the Zenit-3F rocket used (Figs. 7a, 8a, 8b), then went on to observa- to launch the Spektr-R spacecraft (Fig. 4f). tions of Jupiter, the Moon, the Crab Nebula Figs. 4g–4i show the transport of the rocket (Fig. 7b), the Seyfert galaxy 3C 84, and the carrier with the Spektr-R spacecraft and the quasars 3C 273 and 3C 279, as well as cosmic Fregat booster to the launch position. masers (Figs. 9a–9c) and pulsars (Figs. 7f, 7g, The launch of the Zenit-3F rocket with 10). Tests of the ground–space radio interfer- the Spektr-R spacecraft took place on July ometer at 18, 6.2, 92, and then 1.35 cm be- 18, 2011 at 5 hr 31 min 17.91 s Moscow gan with observations of the quasar 0212+735 daylight saving time, from the 45th launch at 18 cm on November 15, 2011 (Fig. 7c). pad of the Baikonur cosmodrome (Figs. 4j– These tests were conducted at various dis- 4k). On that same day at 14:25, the booster tances of the SRT from the Earth, from the and spacecraft, which had separated from it, minimum distance to the maximum distance were photographed using a 45.5-cm optical of about 330 000 km, and using observations telescope in New Mexico, at the request of of various extragalactic and Galactic objects: the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathemat- quasars and galaxies, pulsars, and molecular ics (IAM) of the Russian Academy of Sci- maser sources radiating in narrow radio lines ences (Fig. 5). The SRT was successfully de- (Figs. 7c–7f). ployed on July 23, 2011 (a general view of Further, we describe the construction of the Spektr-R spacecraft in space is shown in the SRT and the configuration of the onboard Fig. 4l). After this, it was possible to be- science complex (Section 2); the launch and gin the inflight tests planned for the first six inflight tests of the Spektr-R spacecraft and months of flight: verifying the functioning of ground control complex (Section 3); the pa- the service systems and the scientific equip- rameters of the orbit and the means used to ment of the spacecraft, measuring and updat- measure and refine them (Section 4); mea- ing the characteristics of the orbit, measuring surement of the main parameters of the SRT the main parameters of the SRT, searching based on astronomical sources (Section 5); for fringes in the ground–space interferometer and verification of the functioning of the 6

ground–space interferometer (first fringes) chronously in orbit. and the first observational results (Section 6). A general schematic of the components of In conclusion, we list directions for further the SRT in the Spektr-R spacecraft is pre- studies. The Appendix presents a possible sented in Fig. 1. The main structural ele- interpretation of the antenna measurements ments of the dish are the following: at 1.35 cm. – focal module truss (serves to regulate the position of the feedhorns); – reflector truss (fastens the focal module 2. CONSTRUCTION OF THE SRT to the focal container); AND CONFIGURATION OF THE – cylindrical compartment (designed to fix ONBOARD SCIENCE COMPLEX the central dish and the reflector-petal open- ing mechanism, and also to house the two on- The automated Spektr-R spacecraft was board hydrogen masers); designed to carry an SRT to be used as an – a transitional truss between the SRT and orbiting element in ground–space VLBI ex- the Navigator service module (used for the periments. It includes the Navigator ser- installation of the scientific-equipment con- vice module (with the Lavochkin Association tainer). as the lead organization) [21] and a science The petal positions were aligned on the complex containing the scientific equipment ground before launch, to allow the creation of to be used for the international RadioAstron the precision reflecting surface upon deploy- project (with the ASC as the lead organiza- ment. This was carried out in two stages. In tion) together with the 10-m parabolic an- the first, each petal was adjusted individu- tenna itself (jointly developed by the Lav- ally using adjustment screws at 45 points on ochkin Association and the ASC) [22, 23]. a specialized weight-unloading support, tak- In addition, the spacecraft carried the scien- ing into account the mass and the position of tific equipment associated with the Plazma-F the axis of rotation of the petal. In the sec- project (with IKI as the lead organization), ond, the positions of the petals were aligned designed for studies of cosmic plasma along after assembling the reflector, by varying the the orbit of Spektr-R (this equipment and ex- lengths of struts fixed to the positions of the periment are described in [26, 27]). petals in the open state. The central dish was fixed on a cylindrical compartment us- ing nine regulating support units. Measure- A. Construction of the Antenna ments showed that, after the alignment on the ground, in the presence of backlash and The design of the SRT antenna was based taking into account uncertainties in the man- on the need to fit the deployable 10-m reflec- ufacture and weight distribution, the maxi- tor in its folded state into the payload com- mum deviation of the reflector surface from partment of the rocket underneath the fair- the theoretical shape of a paraboloid did not ing, which has a specified internal diameter of exceed 1 mm. 3.8 m, and also to ensure the required preci- A thermal± regulation system (TRS) for the sion of the reflecting surface after its deploy- petals, cylindrical compartment, focal and ment. According to the technical specifica- scientific containers, focal unit, and onboard tions, the maximum allowed deviation (toler- hydrogen masers was designed, to ensure reli- ance) of the dish surface of the radio telescope able functioning of the instrumentation com- from the profile for an ideal paraboloid of ro- plex and minimization of thermal structural tation under all conditions is 2 mm [28]. deformations [29]. A cold plate with the The reflecting surface is formed± of the cen- blocks of LNAs for the 1.35, 6.2, and 18-cm tral part of the dish, with a diameter of 3 m, receivers mounted on it was connected to the and 27 radial petal segments, which open syn- antenna-feed assembly (AFA) and installed in 7

FIG. 1: Arrangement of the SRT in the Navigator basic module. the focal unit of the SRT; the TRS radiator the SRT. The geometrical area of shadow- of the cold plate was installed in the shaded ing of the SRT dish by the TRS cold-plate side of the focal container (Fig. 1). The TRS radiator does not exceed 1 m2. The maxi- of the cold plate was designed to provide the mum thermal energy deposited onto the cold required thermal regime for the LNAs and plate from the LNAs is no greater than 0.3 W. the central part of the AFA: maintaining the Heat flow due to thermal connections with temperatures of the LNA sites between 90 other structural elements of the SRT is from and 150 K, and the sites of the antenna feeds 5 to 15 W (this varies primarily with the po- (for 1.35, 6.2, and 18 cm) between 130 and sition of the SRT relative to the Sun). There 200 K, throughout the normal operation of is a thermal connection between the LNAs 8

and AFA along waveguides and cables. Ac- electric power) are located in the thermally cording to housekeeping data, the tempera- stablized, hermetic focal container. The 92- ture regimes for the cylindrical compartment, cm LNA is located inside the 92-cm receiver. containers, focal unit, and onboard hydrogen Structurally, the 92-cm receiver is joined to masers of the SRT in flight correspond to the the block containing the pulse phase calibra- projected requirements. tion units for all the receiver wavelengths. The output signals of the receivers at the in- termediate frequency (IF) arrive at the IF se- B. Onboard Science Complex lecter, which patches the output IF signals to the corresponding input frequency convert- The onboard science complex was con- ers of the formatter for further conversion to structed starting in 1985, as a collabora- lower frequencies. The focal container also tion between Soviet and foreign organiza- houses a frequency synthesizer, consisting of tions. This was carried out in accordance two heterodyne ultra-high frequency synthe- with the general technical requirements for sizer blocks (UHF Synth-1 and 2) with their the design of scientific equipment for the sources of secondary electrical power and two Spektr-R spacecraft and the technical specifi- analysis and control units (ACU-F) with a cations for the specific scientific instruments power-switching unit (Fig. 2). developed by the lead organization for the 3. Two onboard hydrogen frequency stan- RadioAstron project — the Astrophysics Di- dards (OHFSs; H maser in Fig. 2) and vision of IKI, which became the Astro Space the (scientific) instrument container are in- Center of the Lebedev Physical Institute in stalled in the instrument module. Two on- 1990. The spacecraft was designed at the board rubidium frequency standards (ORFS; Lavochkin Association. Rb standard in Fig. 2), a frequency synthe- The first onboard receivers began to be de- sizer with a double block forming the hetero- livered to the ASC in the early 1990s. Ground dyne and clock frequency synthesizer (HCF radio-astronomical tests of the SRT were car- Synth.) and two associated power sources, ried out at the PRAO in 2003–2004 (see two analog–digital converters for the signals Fig. 4b in the color insert), and acceptance from the formatter block, and the two anal- tests of the entire onboard complex of sci- ysis and control units of the scientific con- entific and service instruments together with tainer (ACU-I) with their power supplies are the spacecraft were conducted in 2009–2011. housed in the thermally stable, hermetic sci- A functional schematic of the onboard science entific container. complex is presented in Fig. 2. The Spektr-R spacecraft with the SRT on- The science complex consists of the fol- board is a unique piece of space science in- lowing instruments and blocks, located in the strumentation. The entire complex of on- corresponding modules, shown in Figs. 1 and board equipment and the telescope are de- 2. signed for a single task: multi-frequency ob- 1. The block of co-axial antenna feeds op- servations of very weak radio emission at cen- erating at the radio-astronomy bands 1.35, timeter and decimeter wavelengths located 6.2, 18, and 92 cm in right- and left-circular far below the intrinsic noise levels of the polarizations is located in the thermally sta- receiver systems, and the multi-stage con- bilized, cooled focal unit of the focal module, version of these signals with the very high- together with the LNA blocks for the 1.35, est available phase stability into a videoband 6.2, and 18-cm receivers. from 0 to 16 MHz, providing high-speed 2. The radio-astronomy receivers operat- recording and transmission of the onboard ing at the four wavelengths indicated above, data on the Earth. To successfully carry for both incident polarizations (denoted RAR out this task, all instruments along the “on- in Fig. 2; with individual sources of secondary board receiver–frequency converter–onboard 9

FIG. 2: General block schematic of the SRT. LNA represents a low-noise amplifier; FM TRS, the focal-module thermal-regulation system; RAR, a radio-astronomy receiver; PCal, the pulsed phase-calibration block; IF, an intermediate frequency; TM, telemetry; Rb standard, the rubidium frequency standard; H maser, the onboard hydrogen frequency standard (two copies); HCF Synth., the heterodyne and clock frequency synthesizer; UHF Synth., the heterodyne ultra-high frequency synthesizer; ACU-F and ACU-I, the analysis and control units for the focal and instrument contain- ers, respectively; HDRRC, the high-data-rate radio complex; PLL, the phase link loop; I and Q, the interferometric data fluxes in these Stokes parameters; ADT 15-GHz-1 and 2, the astronomical data transmitters at 15 GHz; UD tracking antenna, the two-dish, unidirectional, 1.5-m HDRRC antenna. 10 transmitter–ground receiver station” serial – P band, with a central frequency of line must function faultlessly, since the loss 324 MHz and a 7 MHz bandwidth, receiver of signal or phase stability for even one of P-SRT-92, ± these elements (not to mention the possible – L band, with a central frequency of failure of an element) leads to a loss of all in- 1664 MHz and a 30 MHz bandwidth, re- formation and a loss of very expensive observ- ceiver P-SRT-18, ± ing time for all the radio telescopes forming – C band, with a central frequency of the multi-antenna ground–space radio inter- 4832 MHz and a 55 MHz bandwidth, re- ferometer. For this reason, all the units and ceiver P-SRT-6M, ± instruments have backup copies, so that there – K band, with a central frequency of is functional redundancy in the onboard sci- 22 232 MHz, together with seven sub-bands ence complex, making it possible to compose for multi-frequency synthesis [30, 31], cover- this serial line of a large number of combina- ing the frequency range 18 372–25 120 MHz, tions of instruments and units. All this ap- receiver P-SRT-1.35M. preciably enhances the reliability of the oper- The frequencies for the eight K-band sub- ation of the complex as a whole. A positive bands with widths of 75 MHz each for effect of this approach was already exhibited multi-frequency synthesis± have the follow- during the inflight tests of the SRT: only one ing names and central frequencies, sepa- of the two onboard hydrogen masers tested in rated by 960 MHz: F− is 18 392 MHz, flight proved to have the required character- 4 F−3 is 19 352 MHz, F−2 is 20 312 MHz, F−1 istics. This unit has been functioning contin- is 21 272 MHz, F is 22 232 MHz, F is uously in orbit for more than a year. 0 1 23 192 MHz, F2 is 24 152 MHz, and F3 is 2.2.1. Antenna Feed Assembly. The 25 112 MHz. In addition, four sub-bands can antenna-feed assembly (AFA) has a special be formed for spectral observations of nar- construction, and is installed at the focus of row radio lines, with the central frequencies the antenna dish. It consists of four co-axial 22 232 MHz, 22 200 MHz, 22 168 MHz and feeds (one inside the other), in accordance 22 136 MHz. with the wavelengths of the receivers. The All the receivers are designed to amplify, 1.35, 6.2, and 18-cm feeds are cooled to about filter, and convert the noise signals and the 150 K by a passive cooling system (see Sec- continuous spectrum of the indicated bands tion 2.1). These feeds are connected to the into output signals at intermediate frequen- cooled LNA blocks by co-axial cables (waveg- cies in the interval approximately from 405 uides for 1.35 cm), which also provide thermal to 555 MHz, and for the narrow-line signals contact between the feeds and the cold plate. into output signals at intermediate frequen- The 92-cm feed is not cooled, and is at the cies near 400 MHz. Each of the receivers temperature of the ambient space; it is ther- consists of two independent, identical chan- mally isolated from the cooled feeds to reduce nels labeled 1 and 2, whose inputs are the left- the heat flow from the 92-cm to the other and right-circularly polarized signals from the feeds. The 6.2, 18 and 92-cm feeds are reso- antenna-feed assembly. These channels are nance “traveling wave” feeds, with the signals separated into three separate blocks: the divided into right- and left-circular polariza- LNA block, the receiver block, and the power- tions along co-axial outputs. The 1.35-cm supply block. For backup of the power-supply feed forms the open end of a waveguide with a block, channels 1 and 2 can be connected circular apeture, with a circular-polarization to either their own channel (1 or 2, under splitter that makes a transition into two rect- the command DIRECT), or to the other re- angular waveguides at the output. ceiver channel (2 or 1, under the command 2.2.2. Receiver Complex. This com- CROSS). Both channels for the 1.35-cm re- plex consists of onboard receivers operating ceiver are supplied from the main or backup at four wavelengths: power supplies, chosen by an external com- 11 mand. The LNAs for L, C, and K bands are plitude calibration, whose signal is summed separate from the receivers, and are arranged with the external phase-calibration signal on the cold plate in the focal unit of the radio from the pulsed phase-calibration block, telescope (Figs. 1 and 2), where they are ra- which is located in the P-band receiver and diatively cooled to temperatures 130 20 K. is fed to the input of the LNA block, pro- All the receiver and associated power-supply± viding calibration of both receiver channels blocks are located in the hermetic, thermo- simultaneously. The high level of the noise statically regulated focal container at tem- generator is close to the noise temperature of peratures from +5◦C to +35◦C. The P-band the channel, and is used in antenna measure- LNA is located in the thermostatically con- ments. The low level of the noise generator trolled receiver block, at a temperature of (which is a factor of ten lower) is used for +30◦ 3◦C. The construction of the P, L, calibration during observations of weak radio and C-band± receivers is based on the same de- sources. The pulsed periodic signal used for sign with a single frequency conversion, while the phase calibration, whose repetition fre- the K-band receiver has two frequency con- quency is 1 MHz, is used during observations versions. The central frequency of the in- in the interferometric regime. A thermostatic termediate frequencies at L and C bands is control system is used to enhance the stabil- 512 MHz, and at P band 524 MHz. The paths ity of the amplification and the signal level of of the output intermediate frequencies of all the noise generator. The receiver blocks and receiver channels include a step attenuator, noise-generator blocks within them are sep- which introduces an attenuation of 0–31 dB arately thermostatically regulated, and the to establish the required levels of the output LNA blocks exposed to open space are like- signals at the intermediate frequency during wise thermally stabilized. The temperatures the ground tests and observations in space. are monitored through the telemetry param- In addition to the output signal at the in- eters. termediate frequency, which is fed to the IF 2.2.3. Onboard Frequency Stan- selecter and is used further in the interfero- dards. Frequency (phase) stability is of metric regime, there are two radiometric sig- key importance in VLBI, and is determined nals with amplitudes from 0–6 dB in each of in first instance by the frequency standard the orthogonal polarizations at the receiver used, whose signal acts as a primary refer- output, which are detected by a square-law ence signal for realizing the necessary sub- detector at the intermediate frequency: an sequent frequency conversions. The SRT is analog signal (converted into an 8-bit sig- designed to function with reference signals nal by the housekeeping telemetry system for from three sources: 1) the onboard hydro- transmission to the Earth) and a digital sig- gen frequency standard (OHFS; 5 MHz or nal (12 bit). The transmission bandwidths 15 MHz), 2) the 15-MHz signal of the phase- of the radiometric paths to the detectors at synchronization loop of the high-data-rate the minus 3 dB level are equal to 14, 60, 110, radio complex (HDRRC), which is synchro- and 150 MHz at P, L, C, and K bands, respec- nized by the signal from a ground hydrogen tively; the signal-averaging time depends on maser at the tracking station, and 3) the on- the band, and is about 1 s. The bandwidth board rubidium frequency standard (ORFS; allocated from the IF output signal of the re- 5 MHz). ceiver for use in the interferometric regime A hydrogen maser device was launched is formed in the formatter (see below); this vertically in a rocket to a height of 10 000 km bandwidth depends on the observing band, and successfully operated during two hours and comprises from 4 to 32 MHz (two sub- of flight in 1976. Its purpose was to measure bands, upper and lower, of 16 MHz each). the gravitational potential and test the pre- In each polarization channel, there is a dictions of relativistic gravitational theory as two-level calibration noise generator for am- part of the Gravity Probe A experiment [32]. 12

The European Space Agency launched the blocks form the 64 and 160 MHz secondary GIOVE-B navigational satellite with three reference signals, 72-MHz clock-frequency atomic clocks on board into Earth orbit in signals, and 40 kHz synch-frequency signals 2008; a passive hydrogen maser was used as required for the functioning of the instru- a primary reference, and two rubidium oscil- ments in the science complex, based on the lators as secondary references [33]. The Ra- primary reference signals at 5 MHz or 15 MHz dioAstron onboard hydrogen maser is the first from the OHFS or the 15 MHz signal from the active onboard hydrogen frequency standard loop phase link (which will be discussed be- in a near-Earth orbit, and has now success- low). The HUHF block is a functional contin- fully been used to realize the orbital program uation of the HCF block, and is conceptually for more than a year. Therefore, the results similar. The heterodyne signals for the 92-cm of its inflight tests as part of the SRT have (at 200 MHz), 18-cm (at 1152 MHz), and 6.2- special value, both scientifically and prac- cm (at 4320 MHz) receivers, and also the 8- tically. A number of specialized problems MHz reference signals for the formation of the not usual for maser frequency standards were heterodynes inside the 1.35-cm receiver and solved during its construction at the Vremya- for the pulsed phase-calibration block inside Ch Joint Stock Company: the 92-cm receiver, are formed from the sec- – degassing of the thermostats by the vac- ondary reference signals from the HCF and uum of space; HUHF blocks. This calibration is realized for – the need to enhance the structural sta- all the receivers at intermediate frequencies. bility of the resonator and storage bulb for The frequency-generation system of the SRT the hard conditions to which the instruments is described in more detail in [34]. are subject during launch; 2.2.5. Intermediate-Frequency Selec- – temperature stabilization of the stan- tor. The IF selecter patches any IF outputs dard using the system for thermal regulation from the receivers (four outputs in each of of the instrument base, and thermal isolation left- and right-circular polarization) to any of the structure of the OHFS using multi- two inputs of the main or reserve formatter layer vacuum insulation; block (Fig. 2), apart from combinations of – carrying out ground tests in the absence the same polarization in different ranges (left of the vacuum of space; with left, right with right). The configura- – a number of engineering problems asso- tion is specified by the selecter keys, which ciated with the use of instruments in the vac- are established by external commands. In uum of space. single-frequency mode, signals from one or In addition, new problems arose, associ- two IF outputs from the receivers of a speci- ated with the higher stability of the onboard fied frequency can be patched to the format- masers and the appearance of new destabiliz- ter — in left- and/or right-circular polariza- ing factors in space flight, such as the gravi- tion. The signal from any one IF output can tational and relativistic shifts of the standard be patched to two inputs of the formatter in frequency due to the motion of the spacecraft parallel, which is important during test mea- in its orbit. Since this is the first experi- surements. In two-frequency mode, two IF ence using a hydrogen maser under such un- signals from the receiver outputs for any two usual conditions, other unforeseen problems frequencies can be patched to the formatter, are also likely to appear. but with the restriction indicated above con- 2.2.4. Reference-Frequency Gener- cerning combinations of the same polariza- ator. The secondary reference frequencies tion at the different frequencies. are generated in the heterodyne and clock 2.2.6. Formatter. The formatter frequency generation blocks, and the het- – converts the signal spectrum from the re- erodyne ultra-high frequencies in the corre- ceiver output from the IF frequency range to sponding HUHF blocks (Fig. 2). The HCF the videofrequency range, and forms the up- 13 per and lower sidebands of the videospectrum of 16 and 4 MHz, respectively. from 0 to 16 MHz each (SSB videoconverter); Two IF converters are provided in the – carries out the conversion for trans- formatter system. The digital information mitting the videodata to the Earth via the taken from them arrives at the data stream onboard high-data-rate radio transmitter at of the corresponding converter at the high- 15 GHz. data-rate stream generator. Note that the The separation of the upper and lower videodata are transferred through the high- sidebands of the videospectrum is carried out data-rate channel using a transmitter with according to a SSB-converter scheme with quadrature phase manipulation of the carrier ◦ ◦ rotations of the signal phases by 90 , 180 , frequency of 15 GHz. This makes it possible ◦ and 270 , as is required for reliable forma- to simultaneously transmit two characters of tion of the sidebands. The videosignals are information, which is used in this instrument. converted into digital form, and are digitally Therefore, the clock frequency of the serial filtered using a seventh-order Butterworth fil- data stream can be lowered by a factor of ter. The use of digital filters ensured high two, so that it comprises 72 and 18 MHz for repeatability of the shape of the amplitude– video bandwidths of 16 and 4 MHz, respec- frequency and phase–frequency characteris- tively. Differential coding is provided to im- tics. Filter bandwidths of 4 MHz or 16 MHz prove the energetic parameters of the video- can be chosen. data transmission line in the instrument. As The conversion chain for the transmission a result, two streams of digital information of the signals to the Earth includes: are obtained at the output of the instrument – the one-bit (two-level) clipped videosig- after the coding, but with “mixed” data from nal and its conversion to digital form; the two streams from the converters. These – the parallel, synchronous interrogation streams are denoted I and Q, and arrive at of the digital values of the signals in the upper the modulator of the 15-GHz transmitter of and lower sidebands; the HDRRC. – conversion of the parallel sub-streams The I and Q streams are divided into of data into a denser serial, high-data-rate frames with durations of 2.5 ms and 10 ms for stream; the clock frequencies of 72 MHz and 18 MHz, – the generation of the frame structure respectively. Within a frame, the informa- of the high-data-rate stream of the synchro- tion is transmitted in bytes. A ninth par- nized, serial streams and introduction of the ity bit is created for each 8 bits, which is data from the onboard telemetry system into transmitted in the data stream. The bits are the frame headers; rigidly fixed to the source of data, so that – execution of differential coding of the sig- they can be identified and sorted according nals for equalization of the phase-modulated to the corresponding groups after the arrival signal spectrum transmitted through the of the stream at the Earth (to reconstruct the HDRRC channel. sub-streams of the onboard formatter). The result of interrogating the signal val- For housekeeping purposes, the first 30 ues for a single sideband is a stream with bytes in a frame are formed as a header, a data rate of 16 2 = 32 Mbits/s or which includes a synchronization packet of 4 2 = 8 Mbits/s× for a video bandwidth seven bytes (for precise determination of the of× 16 or 4 MHz, respectively. To trans- times for the 1st bit and 1st byte of the mit the entire volume of information (four frame and the subsequent correct decoding of videobands) with a serial stream, taking into the binary data), a frame counter (2 bytes) account the introduction of a ninth parity bit from the 1st to the 400th frames, and the for each transmitted byte of information, the bytes of certain accompanying information. data rate is 32 4 (9/8) = 144 MHz and The first 10 bytes of the header are used 8 4 (9/8) = 36× MHz× for video bandwidths to transmit telemetry information from the × × 14 standard onboard telemetry system, which is spacecraft were designed to determine the ca- especially important in the observing regime pabilities for their joint operation in flight. with the housekeeping telemetry channel for Starting from the mid-1990s, after the command–measurement information turned first sets of instruments were delivered, tests on (see below). The operational mode for the of their electrical coupling and electromag- converter is chosen using commands trans- netic compatibility were carried out at the mitted to the instrument along the address ASC. The programs and methods for the tests bus using control code words (CCWs). were developed as they proceeded, and the 2.2.7. Analysis and Control Units. functional adequacy of the instruments and The onboard science complex is controlled the completeness of the complex of scientific mainly through the ACU-I and ACU-F ins- equipment was determined. Three integrated tuments, using pulsed functional (PF) com- tests based on a zero-baseline interferometer mands and CCWs. In the ACUs, the digi- were carried out in 1999–2002, during which tal CCW commands are converted into com- specific parameters of the interferometer were mands analogous to pulsed commands. Some obtained and compared with calculated val- instruments (the OHFS, P-SRT-1.35, and P- ues. A set of receiving equipment designed SRT-Rec) are controlled directly by CCW for ground radio telescopes was used as the commands sent along the address bus. second element of the interferometer. By the Monitoring of the functioning of the com- second half of 2002, the entire radio complex plex instruments is carried out using the stan- was technologically ready to conduct radio- dard onboard telemetry system. Telemetry astronomical tests at a specially built test fa- signals arrive at this system directly from the cility at the PRAO. instruments or via the ACU collection sys- 2.3.1. Radio-Astronomy Tests. The tem, in accordance with the requirements of SRT was assembled at this test facility on the apparatus. Some of the telemetry data a support structure in 2002–2003. The dish are generated in the form of digital databases surface was geodetically adjusted, the electri- (for example, some of the data from the cal assembly of the science-equipment com- 1.35 cm receiver and all the data from the plex and ground equipment carried out, and OHFS are telemetrized in this say). the entire complex and test facility function- Currently, the onboard science-equipment ally checked. From the end of 2003 through complex is providing full functioning of the mid-2004, radio-astronomical tests of the en- SRT in essentially all operational modes, gineering model of the SRT were carried out thanks to the system of functional and in- using actual astronomical sources (see Fig. 4b strumental duplication. Most of the dupli- in the color insert). cated instruments are located in reserve, as a Fluctuations of the sensitivity of the sys- contingency. tem, the effective area of the SRT, and the width and shape of the main lobe of the an- tenna beam were measured in the radiomet- C. Ground Tests ric regime. The positions of the first sidelobes and the level of scattering outside the main During preparations for the Spektr-R lobe of the antenna beam were determined launch, various tests were carried out at the (including using observations of the Moon); ASC in accordance with the requirements for see Table 2 in Section 5. The focal container the scientific equipment to be used. At early of the radio telescope was adjusted to deter- stages in the construction of the SRT, the mine the position of the focus relative to the goal of such tests was to achieve the required calculated value, and the difference between technical specifications for the parameters of the positions of the geometrical and electrical individual instruments. Later tests of the axes of the SRT was determined. onboard science-equipment complex and the Observations of astronomical sources for 15

tests of the SRT in a radio-interferometric SRT-6M and P-SRT-1.35M receivers. The re- regime were conducted at 6.2 and 1.35 cm sults of these tests showed not only a good using the PRAO 22-m radio telescope as a agreement between the calculated and ex- second interferometer element. This same perimental parameter values, but also stabil- two-element interferometer was used to in- ity of these values both in time and for dif- vestigate the interference environment at all ferent models. Based on these test results, the operational wavelengths of the SRT, and and taking into account the dual-channel de- the possibility of transmitting reference sig- sign of the onboard receivers, it was decided nals from a hydrogen maser. The electromag- to simplify and shorten further tests due to netic compatibility of the 1.35-cm receiver the subsequent unavailability of the ground and the 15-GHz HDRRC transmitter was in- scientific equipment. The interchannel cor- vestigated, and individual elements of the relation function obtained during the corre- tracking station were tested, in particular, lation reduction of signals that had passed the S2 and RadioAstron data recorders and through corresponding pairs of receiver chan- the ASC–NRAO decorder. nels was adopted as a key parameter esti- Although the results of these tests led to mating the operation of the onboard science difficult decisions about changing the format- complex. Further, when conducting various ter, antenna-feed assembly, and decoder and grades of factory tests at the Lavochkin Asso- the need to further develop the ACUs and Ra- ciation, the interchannel correlation function dioAstron data recorders, the main result of was used as the main parameter characteriz- the tests was that the ASC obtained an oper- ing the state of the onboard science complex. ational radio-electronical complex, i.e., a full This essentially completed the radio- set of scientific equipment, for further study. engineering tests of the SRT equipment at the 2.3.2. Zero-Baseline Interferome- ASC. The suitability of the apparatus for ra- ter Tests. After completion of the radio- dio interferometric observations and its full astronomical tests, the SRT was disassem- radio-engineering compatibility was demon- bled and the entire engineering model of the strated. science-equipment complex was sent to the At the beginning of 2009, the flight model ASC for further zero-baseline interferometer of the onboard science complex of the SRT tests. This stage of the testing was continued was sent to the Lavochkin Association for the during 2005–2008, and the tests were carried final assembly and integrated and acceptance out at 6 cm. The first task of these tests factory tests of the SRT complex. The as- was the practical verification of the compat- sembly of the entire SRT took place in 2010– ibility of the scientific data obtained by the 2011, together with integrated factory tests space and ground radio telescopes. This task and acceptance tests of the SRT complex. was successfully completed in full. The sec- The complex was mounted on the Navigator ond task was comparison of the interferom- service module in April–June 2011, and inte- eter parameters measured through a data- grated tests of the Spektr-R spacecraft were correlation analysis with their calculated val- successfully completed. Although these were ues. The results of the comparison were sat- electrical tests of the SRT complex, in the in- isfactory, and provided reliable experimental terests of verifying the future joint function- material for determining the interferometer ing of the scientific equipment and the service sensitivity and the required coherence time module in flight, the interchannel correlation for the integrated signal. function was continuously monitored during In mid-2008, a flight model of the onboard these tests. The fully assembled launch vehi- science complex was delivered to the ASC cle and Spektr-R spacecraft were transported for use in zero-baseline interferometer tests. to the launch position in July 2011, and the Tests at 6.2 and 1.35 cm were conducted us- Spektr-R spacecraft was successfully launched ing this model, but with new onboard P- on July 18, 2011. In the following sections, 16 we present material on inflight tests of the loop at 7.2/8.4 GHz; SRT and the transition to the main science – a radio transmitter at 15 GHz. program. 2.4.2. Ground Tracking and Sci- entific Data Acquisition Station. The ground tracking and scientific-data- D. SRT–Ground High-Data-Rate Radio acquisition station is part of the high- Line data-rate SRT–ground radio link of the RadioAstron project. A structural diagram The high-data-rate radio line includes the of the tracking station is presented in Fig. 3. onboard HDRRC and the ground tracking The station is designed to station, together with the scientific data col- 1) point the PRAO 22-m ground radio lected using the PRAO 22-m radio telescope telescope toward the SRT and track the in Pushchino. spacecraft during a link session; 2.4.1. HDC Onboard Complex. The 2) receive and record the flow of scientific onboard HDRRC is designed to transmit data and housekeeping data from the spacecraft; from the SRT to the ground tracking sta- tion at a high rate, and to synchronize the 3) transmit a phase-stable reference signal onboard reference frequency using a signal synchronized by a ground hydrogen frequency from a ground hydrogen maser in one of standard (the tracking station H maser) to the operational regimes of the SRT and the the spacecraft; HDRRC. The HDRRC can operate in one of 4) receive the response signal coherently two regimes: “COHERENT” or “H maser”. converted onboard the spacecraft, measure In the “COHERENT” regime, the the current frequency of the residual Doppler 2 HDRRC is used to synchronize the 15- shift and the current phase difference be- MHz onboard reference signal for the SRT tween the response and interrogation signals, frequency-generation system, as well as the and record these measurements with a cur- HDRRC transmitter signals at 8.4 GHz (a rent time tag; power of 2 W) and 15 GHz (a power of 5) receive the external data required for 40 W). This is done using a hydrogen-maser the operation of the ground station and issue signal that is transmitted to the spacecraft information about the status of the ground from the ground tracking station. In the tracking station and the data collection to “H maser” regime, the 15-MHz HDRRC users. transmitter signals are synchronized using a The ground tracking station includes: signal from the onboard hydrogen maser. It – the PRAO 22-m radio antenna, pointing is possible for the HDRRC to operate with system, feedhorn, and antenna-feeder tracts a lower transmitter power output (4 W) at at 15, 8.4, and 7.2 GHz; 15 GHz. – the phase-synchronization transponder The HDRRC includes the antenna-feeder system at 7.2/8.4 GHz; system and onboard radio-engineering com- – the system for the reception of scientific plex. The antenna-feeder system includes: and housekeeping data at 15 GHz; – a double-reflector, receiving– – the system for measuring the Doppler transmitting, narrow-beam antenna with a residual and variations in the HDRRC signal diameter of the primary reflector of 1.5 m; phases; – a rotating waveguide junction joined to the drive of this antenna; and – a waveguide tract and filters. 2 The frequency of the residual Doppler shift refers The onboard HDRRC radio-engineering to the difference between the measured frequency complex contains: of the response signal and the frequency predicted – a transponder phase-synchronization taking into account the Doppler effect. 17

FIG. 3: Stuctural schematic of the ground tracking station in Pushchino.

– the system for recording the scientific link frequencies of 8.5 and 15 GHz, there and housekeeping data; are two such measuring systems at the sta- – the system for the reference frequencies, tion. The 8.4-GHz measuring device oper- time service, and weather station; ates using a tone signal emitted by the on- – the control computer and station soft- board HDRRC phase-synchronization loop, ware; while the 15-GHz measuring device operates – the apparatus for monitoring the opera- using a phase-modulated signal (produced tion of the station; using the “quadrature phase manipulation” method) emitted by the HDRRC VLBI-data – the apparatus for external links and the transmitter. During these tests, these signals cable-distribution network. were fed to the inputs of the Doppler-shift The effective area of the 22-m antenna measurement device and sent to the screen with the tracking-station antenna-feeder sys- of a spectrum analyzer in parallel, which was tem and the receiver system noise tempera- used to carry out independent measurements ture were measured. The measured effective 2 of the frequency, signal-to-noise ratio, and area of the 22-m antenna is 170 m at 15 GHz. other parameters of the input signals. The The system noise temperature is about 100 K 8.4-GHz Doppler-shift measurement device at both 8.4 and 15 GHz. can operate in one of three regimes: Apparatus for Measuring the Fre- quency Doppler Shift. The operation of 1) “Without control”: the frequencies the ground tracking station’s system for mea- of the downlink, Doppler residual, and inte- suring the frequency Doppler shift was tested grated phase are measured; the uplink signal during the inflight tests. Since these measure- from the ground tracking station is not trans- ments are carried out at each of the down- mitted; the ballistic-software data are used 18

only to obtain the Doppler residual; used in hours at the highest recording speed. The the “H-maser” regime of the HDRRC; recorder is controlled either directly or via an 2) “Ballistical”: data from a ballistic file Ethernet channel with remote access. The (the delay and its first and second derivatives) data recorder at the ground station is used are used to control the uplink frequency; mea- together with control software. surements of the downlink frequency, Doppler The apparatus in the channel for the re- residual, and integrated phase are recorded; ception of telemetry data includes a decoder used with the “Coherent-B” regime of the for the specialized telemetry data (10 bytes HDRRC; at the beginning of the frame headers) from a 3) “Autonomous”: used for indepen- dedicated data-transmission line at the Flight dent control of the uplink frequency based Control Center (FCC) of the Lavochkin As- on measurements of the downlink frequency, sociation sent from the tracking station in Doppler residual, and integrated phase; the Pushchino. The TM data decoder extracts ballistic data are used only to obtain the ini- from each frame of the HDRRC the 10 bytes tial delay; used with the“Coherent-A” regime of telemetry data from the standard teleme- of the HDRRC. try system of the spacecraft, and saves this The 15-GHz measuring device always op- information to a hard disk and/or directly erates only in the “without control” regime, transmits the telemetry data to the FCC or measuring and recording the frequencies of the ASC via an Ethernet port. the downlink, Doppler residual, and inte- Experience has been obtained with the grated phase. The RefFreq program control- reception, decoding, and transmission of ling the measuring device was used to ver- telemetry data from the spacecraft to the ify the operation of this device at 8.4 GHz. FCC during scientific and test observations. Analogous verification was carried out for the In all scientific SRT–ground link sessions, the measuring device at 15 GHz using the Ref- frequency and Doppler residual were mea- FreqM program. The test results confirmed sured at 8.4 and 15 GHz along the HRCRC the full operability of the measuring devices channel to the tracking station in Pushchino. at 8.4 GHz and 15 GHz and their software in These measurements were then fed to an ftp all operational regimes. server at the ASC data-reduction center for Apparatus for the Reception of Sci- further processing and analysis. entific Video and Telemetry Informa- Studies of the operation of the high-data- tion. This apparatus includes instruments rate radio line, consisting of the HDRRC in the channels for the reception of scientific complex and the tracking station, were car- video and telemetry (TM) information. The ried out during link sessions between the former consists of the science data decoder spacecraft and the ground tracking session, and the RadioAstron data recorder (RDR). both with the SRT operating as a single dish The science data decoder extracts the useful and as an element of a multi-antenna radio in- signal from the data flow arriving at the de- terferometer together with ground radio tele- coder from the science data demodulator (the scopes. To enhance the level of the signal scientific data are subject to a special form arriving at the Earth, the program used to of phase modulation onboard). The science point the onboard HDRRC antenna toward data decoder also decodes and operatively the 22-m ground radio telescope in Pushchino monitors its input data. The data recorder was refined. The agreement of the polariza- writes the scientific data in the operational tions of the onboard HDRRC antenna and mode. The start of each recording is syn- the antenna-feeder system of the 22-m tele- chronized by short pulses with a period of scope in the 15-GHz receiver channel was ver- 1 s using a 5-MHz reference signal from a hy- ified and corrected, leading to an increase in drogen maser at the ground tracking station. the received power by nearly a factor of ten. The duration of a recording is six to nine The high potential of the radio line provid- 19

ing stable operation of the entire complex tional for the Lavochkin Association. The in Pushchino was confirmed for various dis- control and analysis groups include special- tances of the spacecraft in its orbit. At rel- ists from the Spacecraft Logic and Control atively nearby distances (less than 150 000– Division who participated in the planning of 200 000 km), the transmitter power is cho- the spacecraft and its ground tests, and also sen to be 4 W, while this power is increased in the preparation and tests of the ground to 40 W at greater distances. The connec- segment for control of the spacecraft. The tions between the ground station, the Lav- staff of the analysis group includes special- ochkin FCC, and the Ballistic Center, Science ists of the Special Design Bureau supervis- Scheduling Center, and Science Data Reduc- ing the corresponding onboard systems, who tion Center (SDRC) of the ASC have all been were also involved in all stages of planning debugged. and testing of these systems. Specialists from the Lavochkin Association also make up the Ground-Segment Control Group, Bal- 3. LAUNCH, INFLIGHT TESTS OF listic Group, FCC Instrument and Software SPEKTR-R AND THE GROUND Group, and GS-3.7 Ground-Station Group at CONTROL COMPLEX the Lavochkin Association. The MOCG also functions as: The RadioAstron Spektr-R spacecraft was – the Science Operations Group for the launched from the Baikonur cosmodrome on Science Scheduling Center of the ASC, July 18, 2011 at 05 : 31 : 17.91. The – the Science Operations Group of IKI for spacecraft was inserted into its orbit using a the Plazma-F project, Zenit 2SB.80 rocket and a Fregat-SB booster, – the Technical Operations Group for the and the sequence of activities for the first ses- SDRC, sion was realized (Figs. 4, 5). – the Technical Operations Group for The scheme for introducing the space- monitoring of the data-conversion block. craft [21] into its orbit (with a perigee height The reduction of measurements of the or- 577 km, apogee height ha = 336863 km, and bital parameters and reconstruction and pre- orbital inclination i = 51.6◦) included suc- diction of the spacecraft orbit are carried out cessive transfers to a supporting orbit (hp = by the Technical Operations Group of the ◦ 177 km, ha = 447 km, i = 51.4 ) and an inter- Ballistic Center of the IAM, with the par- mediate orbit (hp = 444 km, ha = 3711 km, ticipation of specialists from the Lavochkin i = 51.5◦). The control of the Spektr-R space- Association. craft is carried out by the FCC of the Lav- The operation of the MOCG began long ochkin Association. before the launch of the spacecraft, and in- The Spektr-R spacecraft was constructed cluded preparing the apparatus and software at the Lavochkin Association, based on the facilities of the FCC, the spacecraft con- Navigator space platform [21, 24], which trol software, operational and technical doc- was successfully developed for the Elektro-L umentation, training of personnel, conduct- spacecraft launched at the beginning of 2011. ing autonomous and integrated tests of the The Spektr-R spacecraft is controlled by the ground control segment, debugging the con- Main Operations Control Group (MOCG) at nections between the FCC facilities and the the Lavochkin Association, with the partic- control stations and ground science complex, ipation of specialists from the organizations and conducting practice sessions for the Con- that developed the onboard systems and, trol Group. This approach to the forma- in particular, the onboard science complex, tion of a main control group, traditional for ground control segment, and ground science the Lavochkin Association, which also orga- complex. The principles for the organization nizes preparation of personnel and the appa- of the work of the MOCG are those tradi- ratus and software facilities enabled the pre- 20

paredness and reliable control of the Spektr-R work of ground radio telescopes simultane- spacecraft from the very first days of flight. ously with the SRT. Several dozen radio tele- One special characteristic of the organi- scopes have equipment that is compatible zation of the operation of the RadioAstron with that of the Spektr-R SRT, and can in ground–space interferometer is the need to principle participation in joint VLBI observa- coordinate the actions of the SRT, ground tions. The participation of these observations radio telescopes, the ground tracking sta- is determined in part by the requirements of tions, stations for command and control of the specific science projects to be carried out. the spacecraft, the FCC, the Science Schedul- The command and control ground sta- ing Center, the Ballistic Center, and science- tions used with the spacecraft include the data reduction centers, including facilities for “Kobal’t-R” station at Bear Lakes (Moscow communication between these elements. The region), which has a TNA-1500 antenna com- main task in the current stage of the project plex (Moscow Energy Institute) and an an- is carrying out a program of science obser- tenna with a 64-m diameter, and “Klen-D” vations during a number of science sessions. (Ussuriisk), which has a P-2500 antenna com- As a rule, an observing session lasts several plex and a 70-m-diameter antenna. The hours, but the duration can be days or more mean command-session duration is about in some cases. A session corresponds to a se- four hours. In accordance with a decision ries of operations providing recording of the by the control group, as a rule, the on- data from an observed source, conversion of board command-measurement system trans- the signals obtained into digital form, trans- mitter is not turned off at the end of a ses- mission of these data to the ground tracking sion, in order to make it easier to enter into station, and collection of the scientific data. the new link in the following session. How- The scientific data3 are transmitted to the ever, this transmitter is turned off during in- ground tracking station via the high-data- tervals when the science receivers of the SRT rate radio channel in the Ku band (2 cm) are switched on, i.e., during tests and science and an onboard narrow-beam, 1.5-m antenna, observations. When turned on, the transmit- which is controlled from the onboard control ter can also be used to monitor the telemetry complex. The Spektr-R spacecraft is able to information from the spacecraft at distances operate with several ground tracking stations. to 120 000 km (near perigee) using the Lav- As was noted above, the station that is cur- ochkin NS-3.7 ground station with its 3.7-m- rently used for tracking and scientific-data ac- diameter antenna. quisition is the PRAO 22-m radio telescope of The typical program for a control session the ASC. consists of the following operations: A target source is observed with a net- – monitoring the current housekeeping in- formation as it is being directly transmitted; – uploading of command sequences for 3 The scientific data also refers to the large volume of the spacecraft systems for flight and attitude telemetry data produced by instruments in the sci- control, control of the antennas and teleme- ence complex, including the low-frequency radio- try system, control of the onboard command metric outputs of the astronomy receivers, which complex, entering command sequences for are collected onboard by the standard telemetry ballistic and navigational use (roughly once system into a common data stream together with in five days), and uploading individual code data from the housekeeping system and are trans- commands either directly or with a time lag; mitted to the Earth along another channel — the – monitoring telemetry information re- standard radio channel for the command and con- called from onboard memory and the electro- trol system — through small, onboard service an- static control system; tennas, and to the command and control ground – monitoring of the spacecraft orbit; stations (see below). – unloading of the attitude-control reac- 21 tion wheels; plex, with the Sun located at 100◦ to the +X – playback of the scientific telemetry infor- axis, for a duration of up to six hours, with mation from the science-data collection sys- movement of the HDRRC antenna to a spec- tem of the Plazma-F complex; ified position. – uploading of the command sequences The sequences of operations during obser- for control of the Plazma-F science-apparatus vations of sources, radio adjustments, and complex. laser ranging are determined by the monthly During a command and control session, an program of scientific activities generated by operational program enabling the following the SRT Science Operations Group (ASC). tasks of a typical operational cycle in an au- This program takes into account scientific tonomous regime is uploaded in the form of tasks, the current ballistic parameters of the command sequence. orbit, the current constraints on the activ- 1. Conducting an observing session con- ities of the ground radio telescopes, and sisting of the following individual operations: constraints on the duration of observational – successive rotations of the spacecraft regimes for specified attitudes of the space- into a specified attitude, enabling pointing of craft, depending on the position of the Sun the SRT toward a target and pointing of the relative to the spacecraft axes and the posi- HDRRC narrow-beam 1.5-m antenna toward tion of the HDRRC antenna. The Ballistic the ground tracking station in Pushchino; Group for Inflight Analysis and the Thermal – turning on the required operational Regulation System (TRS) Group applies the regimes of the SRT instrumentation at the operational-analysis software of the FCC to observation time; evaluate the realizability of the monthly sci- – reverse rotations of the spacecraft to its ence program from the point of view of all the original attitude. constraints. 2. Radio-adjustment of the SRT: The TRS Group is accumulating a large – operations analogous to an observing amount of statistical material, which can be session, but with the realization of a series used to predict variations of the temperature of successive reorientations of the spacecraft fields in critical structural elements of the relative to the direction toward a calibrator spacecraft as a function of the positions of radio source without pointing of the HDRRC the Sun and the HDRRC antenna with the antenna at the Pushchino tracking station required accuracy. Work is being carried out (the SRT information is written to an on- on the automation of required calculations board memory unit and recalled at the fol- for enhancing the efficiency and reliability of lowing control session). such predictions, and also to facilitate esti- If the required spacecraft attitude is ex- mated predictions by specialists at the ASC pected to lead to a worsening of the tem- at the stage of formulation of the monthy sci- perature regime of the structural elements of ence program. The TRS Group uses a spe- the HDRRC complex (girders, antenna drive, cially developed three-dimensional model of transmitter), the HDRRC antenna can be the spacecraft enabling visual illumination of moved to the position corresponding to the the structural elements of the spacecraft for position of the Sun on the spacecraft axes. various positions of the Sun and the HDRRC 3. Laser ranging of the spacecraft: antenna. – reorientation of the spacecraft over an The Command and Control Group of the hour to the position in which the X axis of Lavochkin Association develops the monthly the spacecraft is oriented toward− the Earth program for the Spektr-R spacecraft based (i.e., the SRT is facing away from the Earth); on the monthly science program. In accor- – bringing about the spacecraft attitude dance with proposals, and the preferred inter- required for the plasma-energy monitoring in- vals for the special attitude of the spacecraft strument (MEP) from the Plazma-F com- required for optimal operation of the MEP 22 instrument, the program includes additional flight. operations on the reorientation of the space- The realization of the program for a house- craft. The Spektr-R program is confirmed keeping telemetry session occurs in an auto- by the operational technical administration of mated regime, with the commands directed the MOCG, and becomes the main document toward particular instruments being obtained facilitating coordination of the operational from the spacecraft and the command– work of all systems of the Spektr-R space- measurement stations. During such sessions, craft. The program contains the schedule of the telemetry data from the spacecraft arriv- sessions for the following month, the schedule ing at these stations is processed at the Lav- of all main operations with the spacecraft, ochkin FCC, analyzed by specialists of the and the schedules of operation for the con- Analysis Group, and transferred to the SDRC trol stations, tracking stations, ground radio of the ASC. The measurements of the or- telescopes, and laser-ranging stations. The bital parameters are sent to the FCC from the actions of the command and control stations command–measurement stations, and further are organized by the Ground Segment Con- to the IAM. trol Group at the Lavochkin Association, of As the tasks in the program of inflight the station in Pushchino and the ground ra- tests of the onboard systems of the spacecraft dio telescopes by the SRT Science Opera- were carried out, the number of Analysis- tions Group at the ASC, and of the laser- Group specialists who were involved in rou- ranging stations by the Ballistics and Navi- tine operations was reduced. Currently, only gation Group at the IAM. specialists of the Complex Analysis Group, One day before the following session, the Onboard Control Complex Service, and TRS Command and Control Group develops a Service regularly participation in the routine plan for the session, in accordance with the monitoring of the telemetry information from monthly schedule for the Spektr-R space- the spacecraft. The telemetry analysis uses craft and based on template programs. The a program for the automated monitoring of spacecraft navigation data and data from the important parameters of the spacecraft to HDRRC antenna are analyzed by the Ballis- ensure compliance with tolerances and with tic Analysis Instrumental–Software Control predicted values obtained in simulations of Group of the FCC. The generation of in- sessions using the onboard control complex flight specifications for the control of the SRT model. The Onboard Systems Service is able science-equipment complex and the Plazma- to monitor the telemetry information outside F complex is done automatically based on the FCC, at its work places. Once they have command-software information prepared by received the housekeeping telemetry informa- the SRT and Plazma-F Science Operations tion from the FCC in real time, specialists Groups. The session program is gener- in the SRT and Plazma-F Science Opera- ated in the form of a control file contain- tions Groups at the ASC and IKI monitor the ing command-software information for con- functioning of the science-equipment com- trolling the spacecraft and commands for con- plex. When remarks on the operation of the trolling the ground command–measurement complex are required during a control session, stations. The correctness of the program is these groups request an operational delivery verified using a data–logicical model for the of additional command-software information onboard control complex, which fully corre- to the address of the science-equipment com- sponds to the programmatic part of the real plex. onboard complex of the Spektr-R spacecraft. Before the beginning of the entire cycle of This modeling is carried out for successive tests with the spacecraft, a ground tracking time intervals, from the beginning of the ses- and data-collection station was established at sion being verified to the beginning of the fol- the 22-m radio telescope in Pushchino. The lowing planned session, for one to two days of data obtained by the ground tracking station 23

TABLE 1: Parameters of the RadioAstron orbit on April 14, 2012 (32 orbital revolutions after launch) Major axis a = 174 714.234 km Eccentricity e = 0.692 Orbital inclination i = 79.69◦ Ascending node longitude W = 300.55◦ Argument of perigee w = 303◦ Time of perigee passage 07:12:37.00 UTC 14 April, 2012 Orbital period 8.5 d ≈ during interferometric observing sessions is also used to monitor the status of the space- craft. The housekeeping telemetry informa- tion extracted from the headers of the science FIG. 5: The two elliptical images near the cen- frames received by the Pushchino ground sta- ter of the photograph show the Fregat booster tion, transmitted through the HDRRC chan- (on the right) and the spacecraft which has sep- nel, is sent on to the FCC. These data arated from it (on the left). The photograph are processed and used in the same way was made on July 18, 2011, at 14:25 (Moscow as the telemetry data transmitted through daylight saving time) using a 45.5-cm optical the radio channel: through the small on- telescope in New Mexico at the request of the board antenna, during link sessions with the command–measurement ground stations, fol- Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics. This lowing observations. telescope is part of the Scientific Network of Op- The organization of the control of the tical Instruments for Astrometric and Photomet- Spektr-R spacecraft and of the Main Con- ric Observations, and is designed to search for trol Operations Group described above has asteroids and comets. provided operational and reliable control of the Spektr-R–RadioAstron complex, includ- its operational orbit, it became clear that the ing during the earliest stage of flight, when useful life of the spacecraft could potentially the first series of tests were carried out. The end as early as the end of 2013, due to the inflight tests and organization of the control low perigee of the orbit. To avoid further of the Spektr-R spacecraft are described in lowering of the orbit perigee, the system of more detail in [26]. onboard vernier thrusters was fired twice in order to correct the orbit. After this correc- tion (March 1, 2012), the orbit has a cal- 4. THE ORBIT: PARAMETERS, culated ballistic lifetime of more than nine MEASUREMENTS, AND PRECISION years, with the interval when the spacecraft OF RECONSTRUCTION is shadowed by the Earth being no more than two hours. The orbital elements after cor- After the launch, the major axis of the rection (on April 14, 2012) are presented in spacecraft orbit was 173 400 km, its perigee Table 1. height 578 km, its apogee height 333 500 km, The orbit evolves due to the perturbing and its orbital period 8.32 d. The first ob- influence of the Moon and Sun. The eccen- servations were made from this orbit. Sev- tricity will vary from 0.96 to 0.59 during the eral months after inserting the spacecraft into spacecraft’s lifetime, and the orbital inclina- 24

tion will vary in the range 10◦–85◦. Fig- their angular velocity of rotation by switch- ure 6a shows the evolution of the radii of ing on the reactive engines of the stabilization perigee and apogee after the above correction. system. This gives rise to perturbations of The radius of perigee varies from 7000 km the motion of the spacecraft center of mass. to 81500 km, and the radius of apogee from The increase in velocity caused by these per- 280 000 to 353 000 km. Further observations turbations is 5–10 mm/s per unloading. The of the spacecraft motion have shown that the accumulated additional shift in the position above correction proceeded normally, and es- of the spacecraft due to this effect acting over timates of the actual parameters of the cor- the course of a day is 400–800 m in range, rection are close to the calculated values. Fig- which exceeds the accuracy of radio range ures 6b–6e show the calculated evolution of measurements. These perturbations substan- the projected orbit in 2013–2016. Figures 6f– tially complicate determination of the space- 6k show examples of the corresponding evo- craft orbit. lution of the K-band (u, v) coverage obtained A model for the spacecraft motion taking for syntheses carried out over a year using into account a number of perturbing factors is the two edge sub-bands (1.19 and 1.63 cm), used in orbit determination. These perturb- for 2013, 2014, and 2015, for the radio galaxy ing factors include: M87 (Figs. 6f–h) and Cen A (Figs. 6i–k). The – the non-central nature of the Earth’s region encompassed by the observations in gravitational field, calculated in accordance the (u, v) plane is appreciably elliptical for with the EGM-96 model [36]; both sources. Therefore, an additional or- – the gravitational attraction of the Moon bital correction may be applied in the future, and Sun, whose coordinates are calculated in order to realize uniform filling of the (u, v) based on the DE421 motion theory [37]; plane in all directions. More detailed infor- – solar light pressure; mation about these new possibilities can be – perturbing accelerations arising during found in [35], and about the evolution of the unloading of the reaction wheels; orbit over the next five years at the project – “rigid tides”; i.e., the correction to the web site [25]. Earth’s gravitational field due to its deforma- Carrying out interferometric observations tion under the action of the lunar and solar requires determining the ground–SRT base- gravitational forces [38]. line with very high precision. The Spektr-R The variable pressure of sunlight substan- spacecraft is very complex from the point of tially influences the spacecraft motion. Due view of nagivation support. One of the fac- to the presence of the 10-m SRT antenna, tors influencing the ballistics of the spacecraft the ratio of the midsection to the mass of is solar light pressure. The pressure of the the spacecraft is appreciably higher than for solar radiation acts on elements of the space- other satellites, and also depends strongly on craft surface differently at different times dur- the spacecraft attitude. Perturbations are ing flight, leading to appreciable perturba- taken into account in the model using an tions of the orbit. In addition to direct per- approximation for the shape of the space- turbation of the motion of the center of mass, craft consisting of the three main components which depends strongly on the current atti- forming its surface: the SRT antenna, central tude of the spacecraft, this light pressure ex- unit, and solar panels. erts a torque about the center of mass. The Measurements of the orbit of the Spektr-R specified attitude is maintained by a system spacecraft and the velocity of its motion are of reaction wheels. The long-term action of carried out using various methods. These in- perturbing torques in a single direction leads clude, in particular, the usual radio measure- to a constant increase in the angular velocity ments of the range and radial velocity, which of the reaction wheels, which, in turn, leads are regularly carried out by the Ussuriisk and to the need to unload them; i.e., to decrease Bear Lakes control stations. Measurements 25

400 100 100 350 A Н− 2014 300 50 −K 50 Н− 250

200 0 2013 0 150 DEC, degrees DEC, degrees

100 P −50 −50 −K 50

0 Apogee A and Perigee P Heights, in 1000 km 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 TIME, days since 15 April 2012 RA, degrees RA, degrees (a) (b) (c)

100 100 2016

50 50 −K

0 2015 0 DEC, degrees DEC, degrees

−50 −50 Н− −K Н−

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 RA, degrees RA, degrees (d) (e)

M87, 2013 M87, 2014 M87, 2015 2 2 2 λ λ λ 10 0 10 0 10 0 V, 10 V, 10 V, 10

−2 −2 −2

2 0 −2 2 0 −2 2 0 −2 U, 1010λ U, 1010λ U, 1010λ (f) (g) (h)

Cen A, 2013 Cen A, 2014 Cen A, 2015 2 2 2 λ λ λ 10 0 10 0 10 0 V, 10 V, 10 V, 10

−2 −2 −2

2 0 −2 2 0 −2 2 0 −2 U, 1010λ U, 1010λ U, 1010λ (i) (j) (k)

FIG. 6: (a)–(e) Calculated time evolution of the SRT orbit and (f)–(k) examples of the (u, v) cover- age obtained for syntheses carried out using the two edge sub-bands F3 (1.19) and F−4 (1.63 cm) in the 1.35-cm band. Panel (a) shows the perigee height P and apogee height A. Panels (b)–(e) show the coverage of the celestial sphere with possible observations with the ground–SRT interferometer in (b) 2013, (c) 2014), (d) 2015, and (e) 2016; the letters “B” and “E” denote the beginning and end of the orbital evolution over the year. Panels (f)–(h) show the (u, v) coverage obtained for obser- vations of the galaxy M87 with the SRT and the Green Bank (USA), Goldstone (USA), Effelsberg (Germany), Jodrell Bank (UK), Evpatoria (Ukraine), Parkes (Australia), Tidbinbilla (Australia), and Robledo (Spain) ground stations carried out in (f) 2013, (g) 2014, and (h) 2015; the position angle of the jet in M87 is 77◦. Panels (i)–(k) show the same as (f)–(h) for the galaxy Cen A, − ◦ whose jet position angle is 51 ). Synthesis of the broad frequency band with eight sub-bands from 1.63 to 1.19 cm leads to appreciable additional filling of the (u, v) plane between the tracks shown for these edge wavelengths. 26

of the radial velocity using the signal from ibration of the regular radio systems. the HDRRC antenna are carried out at the Astrometric observations (optical mea- ground tracking station in Pushchino. Laser- surements of the position of the spacecraft ranging measurements and optical astromet- relative to stars) are carried out by obser- ric measurements of the spacecraft position vatories in the Scientific Network of Optical on the sky are also used. VLBI measurements Instruments for Astrometric and Photomet- of the state vector of the spacecraft are also ric Observations [41], as well as individual conducted using the 8.4-GHz HDRRC sig- observers who submit measurements to the nal, applying the PRIDE method [39]. Such IAU Minor Planet Center [42]. More than HDRRC measurements accompany science 400 entries have been received, containing experiments. The signal is generated using 13 300 measurements. Although such mea- the onboard hydrogen maser. The radial ve- surements cannot yield the required precision locity of the spacecraft can be determined for determining all parameters, they provide with high precision based on the measured data on the position of the orbital plane that frequency shift, taking into account relativis- are independent of the radial characteristics tic corrections [40]. of the spacecraft, and as such are useful sup- plements to ranging and radial-velocity mea- Laser-ranging measurements are one of surements. the most precise and informative of all the above sources of orbital information. How- The use of the model described above en- ever, a number of conditions must be sat- ables reconstruction of the orbit for the re- isfied to obtain such measurements. Since duction of data at a correlator with positional the retroreflectors are only installed on the accuracy no worse than 500 m and velocity accuracy no worse than ±2 cm/s in the three bottom of the spacecraft in the X direc- ± tion, laser ranging requires a specific− attitude coordinates. Note that these numbers do not of the spacecraft that can not always be ob- reflect the rms values of random errors, but tained. In addition to weather conditions and instead are guaranteed estimates of the resid- time of day, another important factor limit- ual, slowly varying difference between the real ing possibilities for laser ranging is the range and reconstructed orbit. limit for such measurements. Most existing laser-ranging stations are designed to work with low-flying spacecraft, and are not able 5. MEASUREMENT OF THE MAIN to detect reflected signals from spacecraft fly- SRT PARAMETERS USING ing above the level of a geostationary orbit. ASTRONOMICAL SOURCES Spektr-R is the first high-apogee man-made satellite of the Earth outfitted with retrore- A. Receivers and Sensitivity of the SRT flectors that orbits at distances comparable to the distance to the Moon. Laser-ranging A description of the Spektr-R spacecraft measurements are currently possible at two carrying the RadioAstron radio telescope stations: Observatoire de la Cote d’Azur in with the onboard science complex, as well Grasse (France) and the Laser–Optical Radar as the ground segment of the ground–space of the Center for Outer Space Monitoring in interferometer, is given in [21–23]. We will the Northern Caucasus (Russia). Complex- summarize by distinguishing the elements ities associated with laser ranging, the lim- that determine the sensitivity of the SRT ited number of stations able to work with in independent antenna measurements and such distances, and the strong dependence on the sensitivity of the interferometer in the weather conditions hinder the acquisition of ground–space system. such measurements and their use for refining The position of the radio telescope relative the orbit on a regular basis. Another impor- to the spacecraft is rigidly fixed. The point- tant application of laser measurements is cal- ing of the SRT toward a target object and 27 scanning of an object is carried out by mov- for 92 cm are radiatively cooled to temper- ing the spacecraft using the attitude-control atures of about 150 K (the AFAs) and 130 K system (without turning on the thrusters). (the LNAs). For this purpose, the 1.35, 6.2, The orientation in space is monitored using and 18-cm LNAs are separated from the re- star sensors. Radio emission from an astro- ceivers and are located in the hermetic focal nomical source that is incident on the 10-m container, where they are mounted on a sep- parabolic dish passes through the antenna- arate cold plate in contact with open space feed assembly and arrives at the inputs of in the shadow of the SRT structure. The all the radio-astronomy receivers simultane- uncooled 92-cm LNA is located at a tem- ously. After the frequency conversion of perature of about 30◦ C inside the thermo- the input signal in the receiver and subse- statically controlled receiver in the focal con- quent scientific instruments, the output low- tainer. The calibration signals from the inter- frequency and high-frequency data forming nal noise generators arrive at the LNA inputs the two streams are transmitted to Earth from the receivers along individual co-axial along two radio channels, where they are lines. archived and processed. The sensitivity is Two types of signal are formed at the out- mainly determined by the effective area of put of each receiver, after amplification and the antenna and the equivalent noise temper- heterodyne conversion of the signals from the ature of the SRT, which includes contribu- input frequencies to intermediate frequencies tions from the receiver, antenna-feeder tract, (IFs) near 512 MHz: the high-frequency in- and background sky. terferometric signal at the IF and the low- The receiver system of the radio telescope frequency radiometric signal. The latter is consists of eight receivers at four wavelengths: formed in the radiometric tract of the re- 1.35, 6.2, 18, and 92 cm, with two receivers ceiver, from the IF signal after detection by a for each wavelength — one for left- and one square-law detector, amplification, and aver- for right-circular polarization. The signals aging over a time interval of about a second. from the circular-polarization generators for The radiometric signal provides the possib- a particular wavelength arrive at the inputs lity of rapid and effective monitoring of the of the corresponding pair of receivers, which functioning of the SRT and of antenna mea- are structurally joined to the antenna feeds surements in a single-dish regime. in the four-wavelength co-axial antenna-feed The high-frequency IF signal from the re- assembly (AFA). ceiver output arrives at the IF selector, where The 1.35-cm feed forms a two-mode cir- two of the eight IF outputs from all the re- cular waveguide, which makes a transition ceivers are selected for subsequent heterodyne to a circular-polarization divider waveguide conversion to lower frequencies and the gen- with two rectangular waveguides at its out- eration of a continuous digital flow of inter- put. The feeds in the other wavelength ranges ferometric videodata for transmission to the are annular-gap feeds, whose ring radii in- Earth. The phase stability of all the conver- crease with wavelength. The annular gaps sions is provided by the onboard hydrogen of the feeds are co-axial with each other and maser or, in the alternative standard regime, with the circular waveguide. The polariza- by a closed phase-link loop with a ground hy- tion dividers at 6.2, 18, and 92 cm are of drogen maser. The low-frequency radiomet- the strip type with co-axial outputs. The ric signals from the outputs of all receivers ar- eight outputs of the AFA polarization di- rive directly at the onboard telemetry system viders are joined with the input LNA blocks of the spacecraft. The telemetry system col- for the corresponding receivers by waveguides lects the radiometric and other low-frequency at 1.35 cm and co-axial segments at the other data from the entire set of science and house- wavelengths. To enhance the sensitivity, the keeping instruments and forms a continuous AFAs and LNAs at all wavelengths except flow of telemetry data from the SRT. 28

The telemetry data are transmitted to the Here, σG/G is the relative instability in the Earth through the telemetry channel (in a gain G for the receiver tract, ∆ν is the fre- real-time regime, or time-sharing regime, if quency bandwidth over the IFs (in our case, the data can be temporarily stored on the on- equal to the width of the input frequency board memory unit), which uses the onboard band, but close to the intermediate frequency wide-beam antennas and the usual measure- 512 MHz), ∆t is the integration time for the ment points on the Earth4. The flow of data signal after square-law detection (all these in the interferometer regime is transmitted quantities refer to the radiometric tract), and to the Earth in real time through the 15- kB is Boltzmann’s constant. GHz HDRRC for the science data. The 1.5-m The sensitivity σSVLBI for the two-element parabolic HDRRC transmitter antenna is lo- SRT–ground radio telescope interferometer cated on the back side of the SRT and space- can conveniently be expressed in terms of Tsys craft, at the bottom of the spacecraft, and and Aeff for the SRT (i = SRT ) and the can be pointed at the 22-m parabolic PRAO ground radio telescope (i = RT ) [44]: ground tracking station or another track- ing station during limited angular ranges. Fsys,SRTFsys,RT σSVLBI = b , 5.3 These antennas are also used as transmitting r 2∆νIF∆tc ground antennas at 8.4/7.2 GHz for operation in the closed phase-link loop regime. 2kBTsys,i Fsys,i = . 5.4 The sensitivity in terms of the antenna Aeff,i temperature σT and flux density σF of the Here, b 1 2 (we adopted b = 1/0.637 for SRT as a single dish with a super-heterodyne observations≈ − with the SRT for numerical es- receiver in the radiometric regime (which is timates [25, 44]), ∆νIF is the recording band- mainly used in antenna measurements) is width, ∆tc is the correlator averaging time, given by the known relations expressed in and the product 2∆νIF∆tc gives the number terms of the equivalent system noise temper- of independent measurements over this aver- ature T and effective area of the radio tele- sys aging time. The convenience of using Fsys scope Aeff [43]: (the system equivalent flux density, SEFD) is 2 σ 2 that this quantity can be measured in a sim- σ = T + G , 5.1 ple way using observations of quasi-point-like T sysr∆ν∆t G   sources with known flux densities Fs: 2kBσT σF = . 5.2 Usys Aeff Fsys = Fs , 5.5 Usg 4 When the scientific receivers are turned on, the ser- T (ϑ, ϕ)dΩ g = 4π b , 5.6 vice transmitters are turned off, so that the teleme- R 4π Tb(ϑ, ϕ)D(ϑ, ϕ)dΩ try data cannot be transmitted through the house- R keeping channel in real time, and are therefore where Usys/Us = Tsys/Ts can be directly mea- written to the onboard memory unit for tempo- sured at the radiometer output of the re- ceiver as the ratio of the detected responses rary storage and subsequent transmission at a con- to the system noise T and to a source venient time. However, when the SRT is operating sys with antenna temperature Ts located in the in the interferometric regime (which also must be SRT antenna beam, and g 1 is the used in antenna measurements, in the single-dish partial-resolution coefficient for≥ the source, regime), both data flows can be unified and trans- which can be calculated numerically for a mitted in real time through the HDRRC channel, known antenna beam D(ϑ, ϕ) and known which is what is usually done. In this case, the flow brightness-temperature distribution for the of telemetry data lies in the frame headers of the object Tb(ϑ, ϕ) (g = 1 for a point source). high-data-rate flow of interferometric data. The integration in (5.6) is carried out over 29

the solid angle Ω. For additional monitor- (“cbl”) (for convenience, the corresponding ing of the system stability, it is convenient subscripts used for the analogous parameters to use the analogous relations (5.4) and (5.5) in [25] are indicated in parantheses). The no- for the amplitude FNS for the noise generator tation in (5.7a) for the sky is analogous to in units of the equivalent flux density, FNS = that in (5.6) for a source, with the integra- 2 kBTNS/Aeff , and FNS = FsUNS/(Usg) [45], tion carried out over the solid angle. since in contrast to FNS, Fsys generally de- pends on the direction toward the source, via the sky antenna temperature Tsky and sky brightness temperature Tb,sky(ϑ, ϕ) [see (5.7) and (5.7a) below]. The expected equivalent system noise tem- B. Aim and Process of Antenna perature of the radio telescope Tsys and the Measurements corresponding temperature of the noise gen- erator T , reduced (“recalculated”) to the NS The aim of the autonomous antenna mea- antenna aperture using the known certified surements is to derive the main parameters of values of the equivalent noise temperatures the SRT in flight, and also during operation of the receiver T and the noise genera- LNA as part of a ground–space radio interferom- tor T in the receiver LNA block, taking NS,LNA eter. This is achieved by carrying out the into account the sky antenna temperature, following tasks. were calculated using the expressions (com- pare with [25]): 1. Measurement of the noise characteris- tics of the radio telescope at 92, 18, 6.2, and T2 1.35 cm: the equivalent system noise tem- Tsys = Tsky + T1 + K1 perature Tsys and system equivalent flux den- T T sity Fsys. The system here refers to the radio + 3 + LNA , 5.7 K K K K K telescope, consisting of the antenna, antenna- 1 2 1 2 3 feed tract, and receiver, with the noise signal from the integrated sky background arriving T (ϑ, ϕ)D(ϑ, ϕ)dΩ T = 4π b,sky , 5.7a at its input; the system noise temperature sky R 4π D(ϑ, ϕ)dΩ is reduced to the radio telescope input, i.e., R to the plane of the dish aperture. Thus, the system noise temperature “automatically” in- Ti = ti(Li,a 1), cludes the sky noise temperature [compare − with (5.7)]. Ki =1/Li =1/(Li,aLi,r), i =1, 2, 3, 5.7b

2. Measurement of the effective area Aeff TNS,LNA TNS = . 5.7c at the above wavelengths using observations K1K2K3 of astronomical continuum calibrator sources, Here, Tsky and Tb,sky(ϑ, ϕ) are the sky an- together with the noise temperature of a cal- tenna and brightness temperatures, Ti the ibration signal from the noise generator, de- equivalent noise temperature at the input of termined from ground tests. element i with a physical temperature t , K i i 3. Measurement of the width and shape is the power transmission coefficient, L and i,a of the main lobe of the antenna beam at all L are the active and reactive loss coef- i,r wavelengths. ficients for element i of the antenna-feeder tract of the radio telescope, and i = 1 for 4. Measurement of radio-astronomical the dish (“dish”), i = 2 for the feed (“feed”), corrections to the SRT pointing relative to and i = 3 for the waveguide or co-axial the coordinate system determined using star link line between the AFA and the LNA sensors. 30

C. Preparation and Conduction of telemetry data from the housekeeping system Measurements for coordinate provision. In the general case, scans of a source in the plane of the sky es- The radio-astronomical measurements of sentially represent linear sections of trajecto- the main parameters of the orbiting telescope ries reflecting a cross section of the celestial (“antenna measurements”) presented below sphere by the X axis in the equatorial coor- were part of a program of inflight tests of dinate system (see the example in Section 5.5 the spacecraft and SRT carried out in the in Fig. 7b in the color insert and in Fig. 8c, first six months after launch. It is planned with the corresponding responses of the radio to conduct such measurements regularly over telescope and scanning trajectories). the entire period of operation of the SRT in The method used to carry out the radio- flight. Up to the beginning of the antenna astronomical antenna measurements was the measurements in the middle of September same for all the wavelengths. In each ses- 2011, the following technical operations were sion (usually over about two hours), mea- carried out. surements were conducted in one of the se- 1. The efficiencies of the antenna and re- lected scanning regimes, simultaneously for ceivers in the radiometric regime were veri- all the operative wavelengths and polariza- fied for each of the two polarization channels tion channels (as a rule, for two polariza- (left- and right-circular polarizations) at 92, tion channels at two wavelengths; see typi- 18, 6.2, and 1.35 cm. cal examples in Figs. 7a and 7b in the color 2. The realizability of the control and de- insert and in Figs. 8a and 8b). Depend- sign conditions for motion of the SRT in an ing on the frame-generation program and the inertial Cartesian coordinate system XYZ sensor-interrogation speed, which is specified rigidly fixed to the center of mass of the by commands to the telemetry system, all the spacecraft, based on commands sent from telemetry parameters of the operative science Earth and the onboard memory unit, was and housekeeping instruments are recorded in verified. The possibility of submitting com- a series of several successive frames, including mands and obtaining results in the astronom- the signals from the radiometric analog and ical equatorial coordinates of right ascension digital receiver outputs and the codes for the and declination at epoch J2000.0 was also onboard time scale and coordinates. The cor- verified. The X axis of the spacecraft coin- responding frame period can vary from frac- cides with the geometrical axis of the SRT tions of a second to several seconds. The use dish, and the Y axis is parallel to the ro- of a procedure for “automatic” antenna mea- tational axis of the solar panels. The mo- surements in a “sparing” regime for the oper- tion regimes of the SRT are analogous to ation of the science receivers5, which became those of ground radio telescopes: “Pointing”, normal, made it possible to avoid both the “Tracking”, “Scanning”. The SRT tracking danger of the failure of the high-sensitivity regime is equivalent to maintaining a con- transistor amplifiers of the receivers and the stant orientation of the telescope in space; as influence of interference on the action of the in the two other regimes, this is achieved us-

ing the attitude-control system of the space- 5 craft, monitoring the orientation using the In other words, with the following conditions: 1) a star sensors, without using the thrusters dur- previously agreed inflight task cyclogram; 2) ab- ing observations (see Section 4). Pointing at sence of interference of an operator when the tasks a source and scanning across a source are car- are carried out; and 3) with the transmitter turned ried out in the Cartesian coordinates of the of and with the telemetry data written to the on- spacecraft, via rotations about the Y or Z board memory unit (instead of transmitting the axis. The recalculation to astronomical equa- telemetry data to the Earth in real time via the torial coordinates was carried out using the housekeeping telemetry channel). 31 normal transmitter signal outside the band, six tabular files in text format with the val- through the wide-beam housekeeping anten- ues of all 600 scientific telemetry parameters nas. The virtual absence of interference from of the SRT, including the radiometric pa- the antenna measurements of the SRT in rameters. This reduction is carried out by flight at all wavelengths was a pleasant sur- the Automated System for the Reduction and prise, in contrast to the situation with the Visualization of Telemetry Sessions software ground tests. developed at the ASC [46]. The individual telemetry parameters in each text tabular file are distributed across the various columns, D. Telemetry Data and their Reduction and their time behavior is reflected by the sequence of frames given as rows, which sim- The original telemetry information with plifies graphical analysis of the data. the antenna-measurement data for each ses- Usually, for reliability and mutual moni- sion arrive at the SDRC of the ASC for sub- toring, the remote processing of antenna mea- sequent reduction and analysis. This infor- surements is conducted using the text files mation includes: obtained from the original binary telemetry a) the custom text exchange form for data using the TsITRUS database of the Lav- each instrument, transferred via the special ochkin Association and the Automated Sys- TsITRUS database of the Lavochkin Associ- tem for the Reduction and Visualization of ation; Telemetry Sessions software of the ASC. Data b) an original binary file with extension from the standard coordinate software in the tmi, containing the entire set of telemetry- TsITRUS system are always used when ob- data frames together with the packaged bi- taining the dependence of the current coor- nary data for all the instruments, which is dinates of the trajectory of motion of the transmitted from the onboard memory unit SRT axes on the onboard time. When nec- via the usual telemetry channel; this file is essary, the coordinates were interpolated and generated at the Lavochkin Association and the uniformity of the spacecraft motion mon- IKI, and is located on the ftp server of the itored. Further, the text data were converted SDRC of the ASC; into graphical form and processed in various c) an original binary file with extension ways. tmi containing the same set of telemetry-data The visualization of the text results (for frames as in the previous item, but transmit- printing or subsequent reduction) was car- ted in real time together with the videodata, ried out using the Automated System for via the HDRRC science channel; this file is the Reduction and Visualization of Teleme- generated at the ASC, and is likewise located try Sessions software together with the Gnu- on the ftp server of the SDRC6. plot package under a Linux operating sys- The reduction of the binary tmi files yields tem. Packages such as Excel were used un- der Windows, as well as the specialized pro- 6 The telemetry data for this file are extracted from gram TMI VIEWER developed at IKI. The specialized software package KRTVIZ was de- the frame headers by the ASC TMSRT software veloped for the express monitoring of the ob- and transmitted through the HDRRC channel and servations via the simultaneous visualization the ground tracking station. These data are used of up to 14 radiometric output signals (8 dig- to generate a binary telemetry file with extension ital and 5 analog) arriving in the binary flow tmi, whose structure and format are fully anal- of data from the HDRRC channel (or alter- ogous to the tmi files arriving via the telemetry nately from a tmi file). This software enables channel. This simplifies the reduction process us- monitoring of the recording of onboard obser- ing the standard tmi-file reduction software tested vations in real time on a local network at the earlier in SRT receiver–transmitter tests. ASC. 32

1.203 RadioAstron --- 313 000 km from Earth --- First Light In spite of a number of specific characteris- Cassiopeia A: 28.09.2011, 1.35 cm (F0-band) --- pointing test tics, the method used to process SRT antenna 1.202 measurements is essentially the same as the 1.201 standard method used for antenna measure- ments at ground radio telescopes [45]. The 1.2 results obtained in various ways were com- 1.199 pared, and the origins of any appreciable dif- SRT signal (Volts) ferences were identified and eliminated. 1.198

1.197

1.196 14:07:30 14:07:40 14:07:50 14:08:00 14:08:10 14:08:20 14:08:30 14:08:40 14:08:50 14:09:00 E. Results Time (hour:min:sec) (a)

Cassiopeia-A, 7 October 2011: 1 of 4 Pointing Test Scans. File = 20111007______00000_.tmi The main results are summarized in Ta- 2.15 6.2cm/1 D-0.05v ble 2 (measurements) and in Table 3 in the 18cm/1 D-2.00v 18cm/2 D-2.00v Appendix (analysis of measurements). Ta- 2.1 ble 2 also includes the main results of ground 2.05 radio-astronomical tests of the engineering 2 model of the SRT at the PRAO test facility obtained in 2003–2004 [47]. Typical radio- 1.95 metric responses to some of the first source 1.9 Spectr-R SRT: Radio Metric Outputs, [Volts] scans are presented in Figs. 7a (color insert), 1.85 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 8a, and 8b, which show scans of Cass A (the 28 28 29 29 30 30 31 31 32 On-board Time = Moscow Winter Decret Time, hh/mm first astronomical source observed using the (b) SRT on September 27, 2011) at 92, 18, 1.35 Crab, 17 October 2011. Scanning and 6.2 cm, and Fig. 7b (color insert), which shows scans of the Crab Nebula at 1.35 and 22.3 6.2 cm. An example of a scan of an area of the sky is given in Fig. 8c. The trajec- 22.2 tories presented in this figure correspond to the radiometric responses in Fig. 7b. Jupiter, 22.1 the Moon and Virgo A (extended objects) were also used for antenna measurements, as 22 well as the quasi-point-like extragalactic ra- dio sources 3C 84, 3C 273, and 3C 279. 21.9 DEC (J2000.0), degrees The characteristics of standard calibra- tors (their fluxes, brightness distributions, 21.8 angular sizes, and polarizations) were taken 21.7 from [48], and the fluxes of the strong, quasi- 83.3 83.4 83.5 83.6 83.7 83.8 83.9 point-like sources 3C 84, 3C 273, and 3C 279, RA (J2000.0), degrees which are variable, were taken from mea- (c) surements on the 600-m RATAN-600 annular radio telescope of the Special Astrophysical FIG. 8: The radiometric response of the SRT for Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sci- observations of Cass A at (a) 1.35 cm on Septem- ences (Nizhnii Arkhyz, Russia) and the 100- ber 28, 2011 and (b) at 6.2 cm on October 7, m Effelsberg paraboloid of the Max-Planck- 2011, the latter against the background of the Institut f¨ur Radioastronomie in Bonn [49] simultaneous responses in orthogonal polariza- at epochs close to the onboard measurement tions at 18 cm. (c) Trajectory for scanning of dates. The procedures used for these ground the part of the sky containing the Crab Nebula meaurements are described in [45, 49]. on October 17, 2011, corresponding to the re- sponses at 1.35 and 6.2 cm presented in Fig. 7b of the color insert. The contour shown at the center characterizes the angular size of the radio source. 33

TABLE 2: Main expected (1.1–1.10) and measured (2.1–2.10) SRT parameters at K, C, L, and P bands: FWHM of the main lobe of the antenna beam ϑ0.5 and ϕ0.5, effective area Aeff , aperture efficiency AE, effective system temperature Tsys and receiver temperature Trec, system equivalent flux density F SEFD, systematic errors in scanning ∆ϑ along the ϑ axis and ∆ϕ along sys ≡ s s the ϕ axis after introducing the constant correction δϑp to the telescope pointing, interferometer sensitivity σSVLBI, ratio αD of the measured beamwidth to its ideal width λ/D, where D =10 m is the dish diameter Parameter K (1.35 cm) C (6.2 cm) L (18 cm) P (92 cm) 1. SRT in Pushchino, 2003–2004: 1.1 ϑ 5%, 5.6′ 25.5′ 74.5′ 6.2◦ 0.5 ± 1.2 A 10%, m2 27 40 40 24 eff ± 1.3 AE = A /A 10% 0.34 0.51 0.51 0.31 eff geom ± 1.4 Tsys/Trec,K 80/45 70/30 50/15 140/30 (opt) 1.5 Tsys ,K 70 66 33 164 (opt) 1.6 SEFDSRT , Jy 7200 4600 2300 19000 1.7 SEFDGB, Jy 23 8 10 55 1.8 ∆νIF, MHz 32 32 32 16 (opt) 1.9 σSVLBI (for ∆t = 5 min), mJy 5 2 2 16 1.10 αD = ϑ0.5D/λ 1.21 1.20 1.20 1.18 2. SRT in flight, 2011–2012: 2.1 (ϑ 5%) (ϕ 5%), 6.0′ 13′ 25′ 72′ 6.1◦ 0.5 ± × 0.5 ± × 2.2 A 13%, m2; 7.5 35 41 30 eff ± 2.3 AE = A /A 13% 0.1 0.45 0.52 0.38 eff geom ± 2.4 T 13%, K 77 130 45 200 sys ± 2.5 Fsys 10% (SEFDSRT), Jy 30000 10500 3400 19000 ± ′ ′ 2.6 ∆ϑs , 1.2 0.2 | | ± ′ 2.7 ∆ϕs , <1.5 | | ′ 2.8 δϑp, 2.5 2.9 σSVLBI (for ∆t = 5 min), mJy 9 4 2 16 2.10 α = (ϑ ϕ )D/λ 1.29 2.80 1.17 1.16 1.16 D 0.5 × 0.5 × 1. The values of the parameters 1.1–1.3 and 1.10 are based on the results of ground tests of the SRT in Pushchino in 2003–2004 [47]. Prior to the ground tests, the SRT dish was fixed to a special retaining frame installed on a rotating turntable and adjusted geodetically. Two noise temperatures are separated by a

slash in row 1.4 (Tsys/Trec), for 1) the SRT system (the first value, giving the theoretical estimate for a height above the Earth exceeding 10000 km) and 2) the receiver (the second value, taken from the receiver documentation). The SRT noise temperature obtained from an alternative estimate of the loss in the antenna-feeder tract of the SRT is given in row 1.5 [see (5.7)]. This is used to estimate the expected value of SEFDSRT in row 16, according to (5.4). The values of SEFDGB for the 100-m Green Bank radio telescope in row 1.7 were taken from [25], as an example of a ground interferometer element. The parameter in row 1.8 gives the recorded bandwidth. Parameters 1.6–1.8 were used to estimate the expected sensitivity of the ground–space interferometer given in row 1.9, according to (5.3), with an integration time of 5 min. 2. Parameters 2.1–2.8 and 2.10 were measured during inflight tests of the SRT. The value 2.5 for

Fsys (SEFDSRT) was obtained from direct measurements using (5.5). These SEFD values agree within the errors with the calculated estimates obtained using (5.4) together with the parameters 2.2 and 2.4. Row

2.9 presents the calculated sensitivity for the two-element space–ground interferometer σSVLBI for one polarization, analogous to the parameter 1.9 but estimated using the parameter 2.5. 34

′ ′ F. Discussion of Results with axes ϑ0.5 ϕ0.5 = 6.0 13 with a rel- ative error of 5%,× compared× to the expected circular beam with a diameter of 5.6′ 10%. In the absence of phase errors, the full ± width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the main This is clearly visible in the source-scanning lobe of the antenna beam ϑ0.5 and the aper- responses (Fig. 7b in the color insert and ture efficiency (AE) η, equal to the ratio Fig. 8c). The measured effective area is 2 of the effective to the geometrical area, de- 7.5 m 13%, instead of the predicted value 2 ± pend on the distribution of the amplitude and 27 m 10%, or at least the projected value 23 m2 ±15%. These expected values for the phase of the electric field over the dish aper- ± ture and the level of illumination of the dish beam and area were obtained during ground edge. For an ideal parabolic reflector with a tests of the SRT in Pushchino in 2004. The circular aperture of diameter D, with some difference between the effective area obtained types of theoretical relations for the ampli- in the ground tests and the effective area of an ideal parabolic surface (40 45 m2) can be tude distribution of the co-phased field, the − expected beam width ϑ0.5 and aperture effi- explained in a natural way as an effect of the ciency η0 at a wavelength λ can be estimated random uncertainty in the realization of the in the co-phased case using the relations [50– dish surface, which has an rms deviation no 52] ϑ0.5 = αD λ/D, where αD 1.0 1.5, worse than the projected value σ =0.77 mm, · ≈ − as was specified via the tolerance d = 2 mm and η0 1.0 0.55, depending on the law for ± the the≈ field− distribution. The lower the il- ( d = 2.6σ [43]). The reduction of the effec- | | 2 lumination of the dish edge, the lower the tive area to 7.5 m could be explained in this same way, but with σ 1.4 mm, or in some value of η0 and the higher the value of αD; ≈ these values are close to unity only in the case other usual way (e.g. a systematic quadratic of uniform field amplitudes all over the aper- phase error in the antenna aperture, with its maximum value 1.5π; see the Appendix), if ture. Phase distortions of the co-phased field ∼ in the aperture will additionally increase αD it weren’t for the simultaneous observation of and decrease η0; i.e., increase the main lobe of appreciable distortion of the main lobe of the the antenna beam and decrease the effective antenna beam. area. Such distortions of antenna beams in Comparing these values of αD with the val- parabolic antennas are due mainly to three ues αD 1.2 obtained from measurements of types of systematic phase distortions in the ≈ the SRT (see parameters 1.10 and 2.10 in Ta- amplitude–phase distribution of the field over ble 2) shows that the measured beamwidths the dish aperture [50–53]: quadratic distor- at 92, 18, and 6.2 cm are close to the theo- tions, cubic (coma) distortions, and astigma- retically expected values. The most substan- tism of the dish and/or feed. Either the dish tial differences between the inflight parameter or feed could be responsible for quadratic and measurements and the predicted or expected cubic distortions, or alternately, a shift of values obtained earlier in tests of the SRT the feed from the dish focus in the directions in Pushchino [47] occurs for the effective area along (for quadratic distortions) or transverse and the shape of the antenna-beam main lobe (for coma) to the paraboloid axis. Asigma- at 1.35 cm, and the SRT system noise tem- tism occurs when the points of optimal fo- perature at 6.2 cm (Table 2). The use of any cus in two main mutually orthogonal planes of the eight input bands is possible during op- perpendicular to the aperture do not coin- eration in the bandwidth-synthesis regime at cide [50]. This means that the optimal focus 1.35 cm. The presented results correspond to point for a feed mounted in the position with the central sub-band, F0 (see Section 2.2.2). minimum aberration (and therefore with the 5.6.1. 1.35 cm (central sub-band F0). minimum width for the main lobe of the an- The measured FWHM level of the main lobe tenna beam) is different in these two planes: of the antenna beam corresponds to an ellipse each has its own focus point, and there is no 35 single phase center. In this case, there usu- Formally, it is also possible that the observed ally exists some common “equivalent optimal- systematic phase errors in the aperture are focus center” or “equivalent phase center” due to the antenna dish rather than the feed. near the middle of these positions, where it However, there is currently no firm basis for is possible to minimize phase aberrations and this, or sufficient data for a quantitative anal- distortion of the antenna beam [50, 53]. The ysis to justify such a conclusion. The simple phase errors in the aperture are the sum of explanation for the asymmetry of the antenna these three types of errors associated with the beam as corresponding to a strong asymmet- dish, feed, and shift of the feed from the dish rical deformation of the dish, such that the focus [54, 55]. Therefore, it is not possible to size of the aperture is a factor of two smaller uniquely establish the real origin of phase dis- in one plane (to 5 m), should affect the re- tortions in the antenna aperture based purely sults at other wavelengths as well. This is in purely on the results of inflight tests, without contradiction with the “good” results for the additional data or hypotheses. antenna measurements at 6.2, 18, and 92 cm, A detailed analysis of this problem (see the which are close to their predicted values. Appendix) shows that the observed elliptic- 5.6.2. 6.2, 18, and 92 cm. In contrast ity of the main lobe of the antenna beam and to the other wavelengths, all measurements the measured effective area at 1.35 cm can be at 6.2 cm were conducted separately in the explained most simply as the effects of a sys- polarization channels. Turning on both si- tematic quadratic error in the distribution of multaneously led to extremely high output the phase along the ϕ axis of the order of 1.5π signals that could not be reduced with at- on the antenna aperture and astigmatism due tenuators. A distortion of the autospectra of to the feed, in addition to the random er- the output videoband for the channel with ror in the realization of the parabolic SRT right-circular polarization was also observed dish surface with the projected rms deviation in the interferometric regime. These facts of σ = 0.77 mm. Such a systematic phase suggest a degrading of the matching between error along one axis in the aperture could the AFA polarization channels and free space arise, for example, in the case of astigmatism and/or with the LNA in part of the 6.2-cm of the feed with a quadratic phase error si- AFA input–LNA input antenna-feeder track, multaneous with a shift of the optimal-focus which worsened the isolation between the po- center of the feed relative to the dish focus larization channels. This led to an increase in by about 0.3 cm along the paraboloid axis, both reactive and active losses in this section with the distance between the two such cen- when the channels are turned on separately, ters of focus of the feed being b 2 cm. Evi- causing an increase in the system noise tem- dence supporting this hypothesis∼ is presented perature in accordance with (5.7), and also to by estimates obtained using one of the phase- self-excitation of the LNA when both chan- distortion models in the Appendix, obtained nels are turned on. Analysis of this situation using the results of numerical computations is ongoing. of the amplitude–phase beam of the antenna- In all the antenna measurements, the pre- feed assembly [56]. The computations of [56] liminary noise-generator antenna tempera- suggest possible astigmatism and quadratic tures TNS obtained from pre-flight ground aberrations of the dish illumination with val- measurements were used, with “recalcula- ues close to those required to explain the re- tion” of TNS to the SRT input using formula sults of the 1.35-cm measurements. (5.7c) together with the measured or calcu- Attempts to derive a self-consistent ex- lated [25] losses in the antenna-feeder tract. planation for all the antenna measurements It was planned to correct these values us- without including astigmatism of the feed ing the results of inflight tests. This correc- were not successful (see the Appendix). How- tion was not applied for 92, 18, and 1.35 cm, ever, this is only one possible explanation. however, the TNS correction was applied for 36

6.2 cm: 1) assuming a corresponding increase should be about 60 K, which is included in the (opt) in the losses in the AFA [i.e., a decrease in K2 expected temperature Tsys = 164 K [25]. in (5.7b) and (5.7c)] and 2) neglecting distor- We emphasize that the AFA losses L2 = tions from the antenna beam that decrease 1/K2 appear in three terms in (5.7), which is the effective area, consistent with the calcu- not always taken into account when obtaining lations of [56] and estimates of parameters rough estimates. Note also that, in contrast 7 4.2 and 5.2 for 6.2 cm in Table 3 . This cor- to calibration using the antenna temperature, rection led to a corresponding increase in the which is necessary for antenna measurements, effective area Aeff and system noise tempera- the astronomical-calibration method usually ture Tsys at 6.2 cm (i.e., to an “improvement” used for both the ground radio telescopes and in Aeff and a “worsening” of Tsys). the SRT does not depend on these charac- This correction made it possible to obtain teristics and corrections, since the calibration a general, self-consistent explanation for the factors are proportional to Tsys/Aeff (for the measured wavelength dependences of the ef- SEFD Fsys) or TNS/Aeff (for FNS). There- fective area of the SRT at all wavelengths us- fore, this calibration can be carried out for ing a single approach to taking into account observations of astronomical sources without phase errors. It can also simultaneously ex- knowledge of the absolute values of the tem- plain the corresponding increase in the sys- peratures TNS and Tsys (see Section 5.1 and tem noise temperature at 6.2 cm, and possi- [45]). bly partially at 92 cm, according to (5.7), as 5.6.3. Pointing and Scanning correc- being due to an increase in the losses L2 in tions. These corrections were measured by the AFA compared to the predicted values8. scanning areas containing sources along the The contribution from the sky background is ϑ and ϕ axes (see the example in Fig. 7b in also appreciable for the 92-cm SRT noise tem- the color insert and in Fig. 8c). The results perature, and can vary significantly with di- of such scanning were used to find the central rection; this can fully or partially explain the cross section of a source, for which the scan- 20% increase in the measured noise tempera- ning process was repeated a number of times ture Tsys = 200 K above the expected value. in the forward and reverse directions along Based on estimates using published distribu- each axis. The forward and reverse scans tions of the sky brightness temperature and were averaged separately using the teleme- relations (5.7) and (5.7a), the minimum con- try data for the standard coordinate infor- tribution of the sky background when the mation, and the difference in the calculated antenna is pointed toward the Galactic pole and measured coordinates for the positions of the signal maxima were calculated, yield- 7 Since the feeds and strip or waveguide generators of ing the desired corrections to the calculated coordinates. left- and right-circular polarizations for each wave- The measurements of the coordinate er- length are structurally joined in the AFA (see Sec- rors along the ϑ axis (with the smaller an- tions 5.1 and 5.2), the losses in the AFA character- ′ tenna beam, ϑ0.5 = 6 , were systematically ize the losses in both the feeds themselves (primar- different for the “forward” and “reverse” ily at higher types of waves) and in the polarizers. 8 scans, and the scanning curve had the “two- Due to insufficient resources and known techni- humped” form characteristic for ground tele- cal problems with calibrating antenna measure- scopes, with values of (3.7′ 0.2′) for one ments, including the problem of manufacturing maximum and 1.3′ 0.2′ for the± other. These good-quality, aperture, cooled, matched loads, the data were used to introduce± a constant point- design documentation contains only calculated val- ′ ing correction ∆ϑp =2.5 , equal to the mean ues of the AFA losses at 92 cm and the results of of these values, which was subsequently ap- indirect laboratory measurements or theoretical es- plied. The two-humped appearance of the timates of such losses at the other wavelengths. scans in opposite directions remained with 37 roughly the previous delay, corresponding to sult, the interrogation of the digital sensors ′ ′ ∆ϑs = 1.2 0.2 relative to the calculated sometimes occurs before the ADCs in these |value,| still with± a time delay that was inde- instruments are in the ready state. Such pendent of the forward or reverse direction noise was first discovered during the accep- of the scanning, but now relative to the zero tance tests. A simple and effective means of mean value between the maxima. We inter- filtration was found and applied, which made pret this delay in the electrical axis for mo- it possible to eliminate this problem for the tion of the SRT relative to the new calculated inflight SRT antenna measurements. No such position of the axis as a systematic scanning noise is present in the analog outputs of the error (Table 2). No such correction was in- 18 and 92-cm receivers or in all outputs of the troduced for the other axis, since the results 1.35 and 6.2-cm receivers. in that case were within the uncertainties. Roughly half the measured time interval between the humps can be explained by a G. Independent Verification of the delay in the response when the signal is in- Interferometric Regime Using Radio tegrated at the radiometer output (see the Lines discussion of this effect in [57]). The main origin of this type of two-humped curve for It is possible to use observations of sev- ground telescopes (which is absent for the eral strong cosmic OH (18 cm) and water SRT) is believed to be backlash in the con- (1.35 cm) maser sources to test the opera- trol mechanisms. The origin of the analogous tion of the receiver equipment, HDRRC ra- behavior of the SRT could be related to sim- dio line, and correlator in the interferomet- ilar delays during integration of the signals ric regime in K and L bands. Several mea- in the electronic system of the star sensors surement sessions were carried out for this and the spacecraft-motion control chains, or purpose, in which such objects were observed some other effect, and requires further study. simultaneously in right- and left-circular po- The hypothesis of elastic deformations of the larizations with the SRT and several ground boom on which the SRT focal container is telescopes. The star-forming region Orion KL fixed contradicts the telemetry results, which and W3(OH) were chosen for the 1.35-cm ob- indicate a fairly uniform speed in sections of servations, and W3(OH) for the 18-cm ob- the motion. servations. The high fluxes of these objects 5.6.4. Telemetry Noise. Analysis of and the presence of strongly polarized com- the telemetry data showed the presence of ad- ponents in their spectra enabled a compar- ditional “telemetry noise” for the digital ra- ative analysis of the characteristics of the diometric outputs in both channels of the 18 receiver–recorder equipment and its suitabil- and 92-cm receivers. This has the form of a ity for such observations. background consisting of “packets” of short 5.7.1. Observations. 1. W3 (OH). impulsive spikes, and is characteristic of er- The star-forming region W3(OH) is located rors in recording individual bits: the ampli- at a distance of about 2 kpc [58] in the tude of their “variability” is not random, and Perseus arm of the Galaxy, and is among the repeats systematically, varying in a step-like most studied objects of this type. Strong fashion “from packet to packet”. Comparison maser emission in both OH lines and wa- with the telemetrized parameters of “ADC- ter lines (with the latter approximately 6′′ to ready” receivers suggests that this noise is the East of the OH masers) is observed to- due to the fact that the standard telemetry ward W3(OH). The spectrum contains polar- system does not take the ready signal of the ized features, enabling estimation of the po- analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) in the re- larization properties of the SRT by compar- ceivers into account when interrogating all ing spectral profiles obtained simultaneously the sensors with fixed velocities. As a re- with the SRT and a well-understood ground 38

W3(OH), 18cm, 15 Nov 2011 350 2. Orion KL. This well known star- Evpatory, LHCP forming region is located at a distance of 300 SRT, LHCP 437 19 pc [59] in the constellation Orion. 250 The± water masers undergoes flares, as a re- 200 sult of which individual spectral features can 150 reach flux densities of several million Jy [60]. 100

Flux density, Jy Since the beginning of 2011, Orion KL has 50 been in a phase of enhanced activity [61], and 0 its flux at the epoch of our observations was 4 −50 approximately 3.5 10 Jy, making this maser −55 −50 −45 −40 −35 × VLSR [Km/s] the strongest object in its class in the sky. (a) The object is especially convenient for obser- W3(OH), 18cm, 15 Nov 2011 vations, since its high flux density makes it 300 Evpatory, RHCP SRT RHCP possible to achieve high signal-to-noise ratios 250 in modest integration times, even with the

200 low sensitivity of the SRT in K band.

150 The observations of W3(OH) were carried out in October and December 2011, and the 100 observations of Orion KL in December 2011, Flux density, Jy 50 as part of the program of inflight receiver

0 tests and fringe searches. Below, we analyze the spectra of these objects obtained with the −50 −55 −50 −45 −40 −35 SRT in an autocorrelation regime (using data VLSR [Km/s] (b) that have passed through the HDRRC chan- Orion, 1.35 cm , 18 Dec. 2011 nel) and at ground radio telescopes partici- 40000 Yebes RHCP pating in simultaneous observations. SRT RHCP 35000 5.7.2. Analysis of the Spectra. Fig- 30000 ures 9a, 9b, and 9c show that the maser-line 25000 profiles obtained on the SRT at 1.35 cm for 20000 15000 Orion KL at the frequency of the 22235.08- MHz water line and at 18 cm for W3(OH) at

Flux density, Jy 10000

5000 the frequency of the 1665.4018 MHz OH line 0 correspond nearly fully to the line profiles ob-

−5000 tained on large ground telescopes. The small 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 observed differences in the spectrum profiles VLSR [Km/s] (c) measured by the ground telescopes and the SRT are most likely due to the low signal- FIG. 9: Simultaneous two-antenna observations to-noise ratio of the SRT data. Figures 9a of cosmic maser sources. (a, b) 18-cm observa- and 9b for W3(OH) show that, due to the tions of W3(OH) by the SRT on October 30, appreciable difference in the appearance of 2011 in (a) left- and (b) right-circular polariza- the spectral features in the different polariza- tion. (c) 1.35-cm observations of the Orion KL tions, it is easy to identify the received po- star-forming region by the SRT and the 32-m larization (left- or right-circular polarization; Zelenchuk radio telescope of the Institute of Ap- compare with Fig. 2 of [62]). Such sources plied Astronomy on December 18, 2011. The can also serve as an additional tool for moni- SRT spectra are shifted in amplitude for clarity. toring the pointing and verifying the correct- ness of the frequency tuning of the equipment at 1.35 and 18 cm. Another task that can instrument. be addressed with such studies is estimation 39

of the sensitivity of the SRT based on spec- 23 m2 15%, which reduces the sensitivity in tral observations in the L and K bands. The the interferometric± regime by nearly a factor parameters of the ground telescope that is of two (for a fixed integration time). used can be used to estimate the flux from 4. Estimates based on calculated values a source at the observing epoch, and thereby of the amplitude–phase beam of the AFA in the SRT sensitivity. Such estimates were ob- a simple model for the phase errors in the tained based on observations of W3(OH) in antenna-feeder system lead to the following the K and L bands and of Orion KL in the conclusions about the SRT in flight. K band. The resulting SEFDs are 3400 Jy – The mean dish surface profile may be for the L band and about 36000 Jy for the K close to parabolic, with its rms deviation band. equal to the predicted value, 0.77 mm. – The antenna feed may have: a) quadratic phase errors with the maximum er- H. Conclusions ror in the feed phase at the edge of the disk equal to roughly 100◦ at 1.35 cm and 35◦ 1. The derived equivalent system noise at 6.2 and 18 cm− (according to the calculated− temperature of the SRT coincides with the- phase beams for these feeds); b) astigmatic oretical estimates at 92, 18, and 1.35 cm aberrations at 1.35 cm, approximated by the within 20%, but exceeds the calculated value presence of two equivalent centers of focus at 6.2 cm by a factor of two, which lowers the of the feed — centers 1 and 2 in orthogonal interferometer sensitivity of this last band by planes 1 and 2, respectively — shifted from a factor of √2 (for a fixed integration time). the dish focus by approximately 7 mm to- The origin of this enhanced noise tempera- ward the dish in plane 1 and 13 mm away ture is probably an increase in losses in the from the dish in plane 2; c) a common center antenna-feeder tract (most likely in the sec- of optimal focus of the feed (between centers tion running from the AFA to the LNA), 1 and 2), which is shifted from the focus of compared to the losses calculated based on the unfurled antenna by approximately 3 mm laboratory measurements carried out on the from the dish along the longitudinal axis of Earth. the antenna. 2. The FWHM of the main lobe of the – These phase errors in the illumination SRT beam agrees with theoretical expecta- of the dish surface may provide the main rea- tions and measurements obtained in ground son for the measured decrease in effective area tests within the errors at 92, 18, and 6.2 cm, and the ellipticity of the main lobe of the SRT but differs appreciably from the expected antenna beam at 1.35 cm compared to ex- value at 1.35 cm: the transverse cross section pected values. of the main lobe at the half-maximum level is 5. The results of radio adjustments show ′ close to elliptical, with axes ϑ0.5 6.0 5% that the mean pointing error along the axis ′ ≈ ± ′ ′ and ϕ0.5 13 5%, rather than the ex- with the smaller beam width is 3.7 0.2 ≈ ± pected circular cross section with diameter for scanning of a source in one direction± and ′ 5.5 10%. The profile of the longitudinal 1.3′ 0.2′ for scanning in the reverse direction. ± cross section of the main lobe in the plane in This± can partially be explained by a delay of which it is wider is appreciably asymmetrical. the response due to integration of the signal 3. The effective areas of the SRT in flight in the radiometer output, and requires fur- are close to the calculated values and the val- ther study. Based on these measurements, a ues measured in ground tests at 92, 18, and constant pointing correction was introduced, ′ 6.2 cm. The effective area at 1.35 cm is a ∆ϑp = 2.5 . The remaining scanning error, ′ ′ factor of 3.6 smaller than the value obtained ∆ϑs = 1.2 0.2 , characterizes a delay in in ground tests, 27 m2 10%, and a fac- the| signal| maximum± relative to its calculated tor of three smaller than± the projected area, position during scanning in either direction, 40

and is due to a systematic error in the an- 100-m Effelsberg telescope was B = 8100 km tenna motion. The pointing error along the (Fig. 7c in the color insert). In all, 20 test axis with the larger antenna beam lies within sessions of the interferometer have been con- the measurement uncertainties, and does not ducted thus far. Interferometric observations exceed 1.5′; this error was not corrected for of the pulsar PSR 0950+08 at 92 cm were in subsequent observations. carried out with the spacecraft at the record 6. Comparison of the autocorrelation distance of 300 000 km (a projected baseline spectra for two strong maser sources in L of about 220000 km) on January 25, 2012, and K bands indicates that the spectral ob- with the participation of the largest ground servational regime of the SRT is functioning radio telescope — Arecibo, with a diameter normally. Such observations can be used to of 300 m (Figs. 7f, 7g in the color insert). monitor the frequency tuning and polariza- Most interferometric observations have used tion regime during observations. Estimates of the onboard hydrogen maser, but successful the SRT sensitivity based on observations of test sessions have also been carried out in radio lines are in agreement with the results a regime where a coherent signal from the of continuum observations. The full determi- hydrogen maser at the tracking station in nation of the polarization parameters of the Pushchino is sent to the spacecraft and then radio telescope, which is possible using spe- sent back to the tracking station (a so-called cially planned observations of several bright closed phase loop regime). maser sources such as Orion KL, remains in- In the interferometric regime, the sensitiv- complete. ity of the system of two telescopes is pro- portional to the square root of the prod- uct of the effective areas of these telescope; 6. VERIFICATION OF THE thus, the combination of the 10-m SRT and FUNCTIONING OF THE a 100-m ground radio telescope has a sensi- GROUND–SPACE tivity equivalent to a pair of two 30-m tele- INTERFEROMETER (FIRST scopes. It is not possible to obtain the re- FRINGES) AND FIRST sults of a ground–space interferometer mea- OBSERVATIONAL RESULTS surement immediately after the measurement itself. The scientific data recorded at the var- In this section, we present a brief survey of ious radio telescopes are first transmitted to the first results obtained in the interferomet- a reduction center for correlation (detection ric regime. These results will be discussed of the interferometer response). This cor- in more detail in future articles by various relation can be carried out only after high- international groups involved with the fringe precision reconstruction of the spacecraft or- searches and the Early Science Program, af- bit at the ballistic center. ter a more thorough analysis of the data. The reduction and analysis of data ob- The detection of the interferometer signal tained using the RadioAstron ground–space between the RadioAstron SRT and ground interferometer are carried out at the ASC in radio telescopes has demonstrated the over- collaboration with other participants of the all successful operation of the space–ground project. First and foremost, this includes VLBI system at all four wavelengths: 92, 18, the correlation of the data flows recorded at 6.2, and 1.35 cm (Figs. 7c–7g in the color the individual radio telescopes at rates of 128 insert). The first signal from the space in- or 256 Mbits/s, including the space segment terferometer was obtained for observations of the SRT (128 Mbits/s), using the RDR-1 made on November 15, 2011, of the quasar recording system created at the ASC [63] and 0212+735 at 18 cm, when the spacecraft was the Mark5 recording system developed in the about 100000 km from the Earth and the pro- USA [64]. The FX correlator of the ASC is jected baseline between RadioAstron and the based on a computing cluster with a perfor- 41

Crab Pulsar

3 RadioAstron

2

1

0

−15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15

15 Badary ) σ 10

5 Intensity ( 0

−15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15

15 Evpatoria

10

5

0

−15 −10 −5 0 5 10 15 Time (µs)

FIG. 10: Simultaneous three-antenna observa- tions of the giant pulses of the Crab Neb- ula pulsar on November 14, 2011, carried out by the SRT, the Badary 32-m telescope (near Irkutsk, Russia), and the 70-m Evpatoria tele- scope (Ukraine) at 18 cm. FIG. 11: 6.2-cm image of the rapidly variable BL Lac object 0716+714. The observations were mance of 1 Tflop/s and a RAID data-storage carried out using the SRT and the EVN on system with a volume of up to 200 Tbyte. March 14-15, 2012 as part of the RadioAstron The technical characteristics of the proces- Early Science Program on AGNs. This image sor cluster of the ASC SDRC is able to han- was constructed using an antenna beam with a dle data flows from 10 stations including the FWHM of 0.5 mas, whose cross section is shown SRT with integrated data rates of up to 2.56 Gbits/s; accordingly, it can process up in the lower left-hand corner of the figure. The to 45 interferometer baselines. This can be lowest contour is 0.25 mJy/beam, and the con- done essentially at the rate at which the data tours increase in steps of a factor of two. The were recorded in real time. peak intensity is 0.43 Jy/beam. The “beam” is the solid angle of the shown cross section. The detection of an interferometer re- sponse is not in itself a final scientific result. However, with certain assumptions about the thy conclusions about the structure of a stud- structure of a compact feature, it can be ied object. The required set of such config- used to estimate its angular size and bright- urations can be realized in observations over ness temperature. Multiple observations with no less than one calendar year. The planned various telescope configurations, most impor- observing strategy is to study a sample of ra- tantly with various positions of the spacecraft dio sources over the course of a year (and in its orbit, are necessary to derive trustwor- sometimes several years), after which a multi- 42

faceted analysis is applied to draw basic con- tering in the interstellar medium was de- clusions about the structure and physical con- tected for another nearby pulsar Vela, at a ditions in the studied objects. distance of 300 pc. This pulsar was ob- ∼ The RadioAstron Early Science Program served at 18 cm jointly by the SRT and has been underway since February 2012, and the largest radio telescopes of the Southern is overseen at the ASC and carried out by in- hemisphere in May 2012. The Parkes, Mo- ternational groups of researchers formed in pra, Hobart (all Australia), Hartebeesthoek the framework of the project. Thus far, (South Africa), and Tidbinbilla (Australia) the interferometer responses from the pul- radio telescopes participated in these obser- sars PSR 0950+08, PSR 0531+21 (Crab), vations. The reduction of these data showed PSR 0833-45 (Vela), and PSR 1919+21, that the structure of the interferometer re- the AGNs 0212+735, 0716+714, 0748+126, sponse changes completely at a projected 0754+100, 2013+370, 0851+202 (OJ287), baseline of 100 000 km (numerous narrow 1954+513, and 2200+420 (BL Lac), and the brightenings are observed), indicating that Galactic maser W51 have been measured we are observing the results of a multi-path (see the RadioAstron newsletters for 2011– propagation of the radio waves through inho- 2012 [65]). These responses were obtained for mogeneous interstellar plasma. projected baselines for the ground–space in- An example of the interferometer response terferometer of less than 10000 km to about to an H2O maser source (1.35 cm) in the star- 250 000 km, roughly 20 Earth diameters. forming region W51 obtained during observa- After confirmation of the possibility of tions with the SRT and the 100-m Effelsberg observing giant pulses from the Crab Neb- radio telescope is presented in Fig. 7e (color ula pulsar (at a distance of 1 kpc) with the insert). These observations were carried out SRT, correlations between the 18-cm pulses on May 12, 2012, with a projected ground– recorded at the SRT and the Evpatoria, Svet- space baseline of 14 500 km (1.14 Earth di- loe, Zelenchuk, and Badary ground radio tele- ameters), yielding an angular resolution of scopes were detected for observations made 80 µas. on November 14, 2011, for projected base- The largest number of interferometric ob- lines of up to B = 40000 km (Fig. 10). This servations have been associated with studies testifies that scattering of the image in the of the structure of AGNs. Interferometry re- interstellar medium along the path from the sponses at 6.2 cm with projected values for pulsar to the observer at 18 cm was no greater the SRT–Effelsberg baseline B = 92 000 km, than the angular resolution of the interferom- or 7.2 Earth diameters, have been obtained eter, 400 µas. for the two quasars OJ 287 (which some au- Interferometer observations of ordinary thors have suggested may harbor a binary su- pulses of the nearby pulsar PSR 0950+08 permassive black hole; see, for example, [67]) (260 pc; Fig. 7f in the color insert) did not de- and BL Lacertae (the prototype of the class of tect interstellar scattering even at 92 cm with BL Lac objects). This yields brightness tem- projected baselines of up to B = 220 000 km. perature estimates for the dominant feature In this way, an angular resolution of 370 µas in the compact jet — the core — of about was achieved at meter wavelengths. Obser- 1013 K or somewhat higher. This exceeds vations of this pulsar over one hour (Fig. 7g the well known inverse-Compton limit for the in the color insert) enabled the detection of brightness temperature [68], but the emission variability of the visibility function with such can still be explained in the standard model long baselines, opening possibilities for study- with incoherent synchrotron emission from a ing the parameters of turbulence of the inter- Doppler-boosted relativistic jet [69]. stellar plasma and the achievement of even For the AGN 0716+714, which is among higher angular resolution using the “inter- the most rapidly variable extragalactic ob- stellar interferometer” principle [66]. Scat- jects, interference fringes were detected at 43

6.2 cm at multiple projected ground–space ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS baselines from roughly 1.5 to more than 5 Earth diameters. The international group The development and modernization of working on the Early Science Program con- the RadioAstron project was carried out over structed an image of this object (Fig. 11) and many years. We consider it our duty to estimated the parameters of the core. The express thanks for the contributions to this width at the base of the jet in the core region work by all our colleagues, who are too nu- is approximately 70 µas, or 0.3 pc, and the merous to list here individually. Among brightness temperature is 2 1012 K. Note × them, we are especially grateful for the sup- that these parameters were measured at an port and participation of Roal’d Sagdeev, epoch of minimum activity of this object. Victor Troshin, Anatolii Trubnikov, and Oleg Andreev (IKI) and Gerard Mersch and Kees van’t Klooster (ESA/ESTEC) in the early stages of the project, and for the partic- ipation of Jan Buiter (Netherlands), Sam 7. CONCLUSION Wongsowijoto (Germany), Yurii Onopko and Tanya Downs (Australia), Petri Jukkala, Juha Mallat, and Petri Piironen (Finland) in The RadioAstron space radio telecope has planning and the creation of the first onboard been inserted into the nominal orbit, and science receivers as part of the international successfully tested in both autonomous and receiver development group in 1985–1994. ground–space interferometric regimes at all We are grateful to the scientific and tech- four operational wavelengths (1.35, 6.2, 18, nical staff of the Special Astrophysical Ob- and 92 cm). The main parameters of the SRT servatory of the Russian Academy of Sci- and interferometer have been determined. ences (Nizhnii Arkhyz, Russia) and Effels- Record angular resolutions, more than a fac- berg (Germany) for ground support of the tor of 10 better than is attainable on Earth, antenna measurements of the SRT parame- have been achieved. The sensitivity derived ters based on multi-frequency observations of from inflight tests is sufficient to enable a quasi-point-like variable raido sources, and full-scale program of scientific studies. Fur- the staff of the observatories whose radio ther measurements will be used to refine the telescopes have participated in the inflight limits of possible observations in several di- tests to carry out fringe searches, namely rections: 1) determination of the flux limit the Svetloe, Zelenchuk, and Badary antennas for the detection of linearly polarized emis- of the Kvazar Network (Russia), Evpatoria sion, 2) use of evolutionary changes in the (Ukraine), Effelsberg (Germany), the NRAO orbit to obtain fuller information about the Green Bank Telescope and Arecibo Observa- structure of objects (in paraticular, to at- tory (USA), Westerbork (The Netherlands), tain ultra-high angular resolution both along Yebes (Spain), Medicina (Italy), and Usuda and across jet structures in AGNs), 3) appli- (Japan). Subsequent observations carried out cation of multi-frequency synthesis in image as part of the Early Science Program in- construction, 4) analysis of Faraday rotation cluded joint observations of the SRT together of the plane of polarization based on multi- with some individual ground telescopes, as frequency observations, 5) study of variability well as the Kvazar, EVN, and LBA VLBI of the source structures, 6) high-precision as- networks. We thank the staff of the Svet- trometric measurements, 7) analysis of pos- loe, Zelenchuk, and Badary (Russia), Evpato- sibilities for high-precision determination of ria (Ukraine), Effelsberg (Germany), NRAO the spacecraft motion, etc. Green Bank Telescope and Arecibo (USA), Brief reports about current results are reg- Westerbork (Netherlands), Yebes and Rob- ularly issued in RadioAstron newsletters [65]. ledo (Spain), Medicina and Noto (Italy), 44

Usuda (Japan), Jodrell Bank (UK), On- nese, South African and other radio astron- sala (Sweden), Shangai and Urumqi (China), omy institues funded by their national re- ATCA, Parkes, Mopra, Hobart, and Tid- search councils. The National Radio Astron- binbilla (Australia), Hartebeesthoek (South omy Observatory is a facility of the National Africa), and Ooty (India) observatories. Science Foundation operated under coopera- We thank the referee for comments that tive agrement by Associated Universities, Inc. have made it possible to improve this paper, Authors thank Denice Gabuzda for trans- L.S. Chesalin for help in setting up the track- lating the original manuscript (Astronomich- ing station at the Pushchino Radio Astron- eskii Zhurnal, 2013, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 179– omy Observatory, E.P. Kolesnikov for useful 222) from Russian to English. discussions of the electromagnetic compati- bility of scientific receivers and the house- APPENDIX keeping transmitters of the SRT in the case of out-of-bandwidth reception and the results of measurements of the main parameters of the POSSIBLE INTERPRETATION OF SRT, P.G. Tsybulev for discussions of the ori- THE 1.35-CM ANTENNA gin of “telemetry noise” and the development MEASUREMENTS of the KRTVIZ program for visualizing obser- vations, G.V. Lipunova for help in preparing The measured ellipticity of the main lobe the figures with the test results. of the SRT antenna beam at the half- Work on the Early Science Program of the maximum power level could be due to com- RadioAstron project has been partially sup- paratively large phase errors along the ϕ axis ported by the Basic Research Programs of combined with relatively modest distortions the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sci- in the orthogonal ϑ axis. We will refer to ences P-20 (“The Origin, Structure, and Evo- the orthogonal azimuthal planes correspond- lution of Objects in the Universe”) and P- ing to longitudinal cross sections of the main 21 (“Non-stationary Phenomena in Objects lobe of the SRT beam with widths ϑ0.5 and of the Universe”), the Basic Research Pro- ϕ0.5 along these axis as “plane 1” and “plane grams of the Division of Physical Sciences 2”, and to the corresponding phase errors of the Russian Academy of Sciences OFN- over the dish aperture as δϕ1 and δϕ2. The 16 (“Active Processes and Stochastic Struc- main lobe of the antenna beam in plane 2 tures in the Universe”) and OFN-17 (“Active (along the ϕ axis) turned out to be a fac- Processes in Galactic and Extragalactic Ob- tor of 2.2 wider than in plane 1, apprecia- jects”), the Ministry for Education and Sci- bly asymmetric, and somewhat shifted rela- ence of the Russian Federation, in the frame- tive to the calculated geometrical axis of the work of the Federal Targeted Program “Sci- SRT; these properties are characteristic for ence and Scientific Staff of Innovative Russia” distortions that arise due to combinations of for 2009–2013 (State contract 16.740.11.0155; all three types of aberration — quadratic, cu- Agreement 8405), the Russian Foundation for bic, and astigmatic. Basic Research (projects 10-02-0076, 10-02- Physically, the maximum quadratic and 00147, 11-02-00368, 12-02-33101), and the cubic phase errors in ground radio telescopes “Dinastiya” Foundation for Non-Commercial usually indicate defocusing of radiation re- Programs. The RATAN-600 observations flected from the edge of the dish that arises used in the analysis of the antenna measure- due to transverse or longitudinal shifts of the ments were supported by the Ministry for feed from the focus; such errors are charac- Education and Science of the Russian Fed- teristic even for ideal paraboloids with mod- eration (State contracts 16.518.11.7062 and est ratios of the focal distance F to the di- 16.552.11.7028). The European VLBI Net- ameter of the dish aperture D (F/D 0.43 work is a joint facility of European, Chi- for the SRT). In this case, assuming that≈ the 45

feed was mounted at the calculated geometri- Note that, since formula (A.2) was obtained cal focus of the paraboloid with the projected assuming a Gaussian amplitude distribution accuracy ( 1 mm), such errors could appear, over the aperture, with illumination of the for example,± if the real focus of the unfurled aperture edge to the 0.1 level [55], we ex- dish did not precisely coincide with the cal- pect that this formula is more applicable for culated position. However, other origins are our estimates, in spite of the fact that this also possible, including peculiarities of the il- takes into account only quadratic, not cubic, lumination of the dish (see below). phase errors. We will neglect area losses due Rough quantitative estimates yield for the to cubic phase errors (or coma-type aberra- phase error in plane 1 at the dish edge (rela- tion) here. tive to the aperture center) δϕ1 0 (since The reduction of the effective area can also ≈ ϑ0.5 is close to the predicted value for the formally be explained using only ησ with an undistorted beam within the errors, see pa- rms deviation σ 1.4 mm. This value of σ rameters 1.10 and 2.10 in Table 2), while the would then be considered≈ some kind of “effec- error in plane 2 is δϕ2 (2π/λ)R0(ϕ0.5 tive” random error. In our case, it is possible 9 ∼ − ϑ0.5)=1.5π , where λ =1.35 cm is the wave- to distinguish the similar contributions of σ length, R0 = 500 cm the radius of the SRT ′ ′ and ϕq only because of the observed elliptic- dish, ϕ0.5 = 13 , and ϑ0.5 =6 . ity of the antenna beam. The difference in the effective area can be The observed scatter in the measured ef- explained quantitatively by the combination fective areas about the mean area (more than of a systematic error in the dish aperture 10%) could indicate variability of the random ϕq = δϕ1 + δϕ2 1.5π and random errors ∼ and systematic errors (σ and ϕq) due to vari- with the projected rms σ = 0.77 mm, using ation in the temperature distribution over the the following formulas for the coefficients ησ dish surface with variation in the SRT orien- and ηϕ for the decrease in the effective area tation relative to the Sun. For example, it of the antenna aperture [43, 55]: follows from (A.1) that, with σ 0.77 mm, ≈ η = exp[ (4πσ/λ)2], A.1 varying σ by even 0.1 mm could lead to ap- σ − preciable variations in the effective area of the 2 SRT at 1.35 cm. This strong dependence on ηϕ =6.55(1.01 0.2 cos ϕq)/(5.3+ ϕq). A.2 − the random error is due to the closeness of the Whence, ησ = 0.60, ηϕ = 0.24, η = ησηϕ = central wavelength at 1.35 cm to the so-called 0.15, and we obtain for the effective area A0 “limiting” wavelength of the radio telescope “corrected” for these losses A0 = Aeff /ηϕ = 2 2 λmin, which is equal to λmin (20 16)σ (ac- 31 m and A0 = Aeff /η = 50 m for Aeff = ≈ − 2 cording to the practical criterion for estimat- 7.5 m . These values of A0 confirm that the ing this limiting wavelength given in [43]), two types of errors considered could, in prin- and depends on the accuracy of the realiza- ciple, be the main causes of the reduction in tion of the dish surface, usually relative to an Aeff and the aperture efficiency (reductions of ideal parabolic surface. We have for the SRT AE from 1 to 0.5 0.6 are typical for single- − λ/σ = 18 for λ = 13.5 mm and the projected dish antennas, and are usually determined by rms deviation σ =0.77 mm. other well known factors, most importantly over-illumination of the dish and incidence of We emphasize that it is not possible to un- radiation toward the dish edge (depending on ambiguously establish the physical origins of the feed beam) and errors in the dish sur- phase distortions in the antenna aperture and face; see, for example, Appendix 5 in [43]). distinguish the contributions to the errors of the dish, feed, and geometry of the antenna- feeder system based on the results of inflight 9 Estimates based on plots presented in [51, 53] give tests of the SRT alone, without additional similar values: π < ϕq < 2π for a broadening of data or assumptions. We can only be sure the main lobe of the beam by a factor of 1.5 3. that these are due to some total phase error ≈ − 46

TABLE 3: Modeling of phase errors in the antenna system: three models for the contribution of feed phase errors [56] to the decrease in Aeff and the aperture efficiency AE, as well as the ellipticity of the cross section of the main lobe of the SRT beam Parameter K (1.35 cm) C (6.2 cm) L (18 cm) P (92 cm) SRT in flight, 2011–2012: 2 1. Aeff , m 7.5 35 41 30 2. AE = Aeff /Ageom 0.1 0.45 0.52 0.38 3. ησ = ησ(σ = 0.77 mm) 0.60 0.98 1.00 1.00 4. Model 1: ϕq = 2δΨmax. 4.0 δΨmax (in degrees of phase) -100 -35 -35 – 4.1 ϕq (in degrees of phase) -200 -70 -70 – 4.2 ηϕ = ηϕ(ϕq) 0.45 0.91 0.91 – 4.3 η = ησηϕ 0.27 0.89 0.91 – 2 4.4 A0 = Aeff /η, m 28 39 45 – 4.5 AE0 = A0/Ageom 0.35 0.50 0.57 – 5. Model 2: ϕq = 2δΨmax + δϕx. δ1 = 5.3 mm 5.0 δϕx = kδ1/2 (in degrees of phase) -70 -15 -5 – 5.1 ϕq (in degrees of phase) -270 -85 -75 – 5.2 ηϕ = ηϕ(ϕq) 0.24 0.87 0.89 – 5.3 η = ησηϕ 0.15 0.85 0.89 – 2 5.4 A0 = Aeff /η, m 50 41 46 – 5.5 AE0 = A0/Ageom 0.64 0.52 0.59 – 6. Model 3: ϕq = δϕ1 + δϕ2; δϕ1 = δΨmax + kδ11/2 = 0; δϕ = δΨ kδ /2= 1.5π; 2 max − 12 − 6.0 δϕ = k(δ δ )/2 (in degrees of phase) -70 – – – x 11 − 12 6.1 ϕq (in degrees of phase) -270 – – – 6.2 ηϕ = ηϕ(ϕq) 0.24 – – – 6.3 η = ησηϕ 0.15 – – – 2 6.4 A0 = Aeff /η, m 50 – – – 6.5 AE0 = A0/Ageom 0.64 – – – 6.6 δ11, mm 7.5 – – – 6.7 δ12, mm 13 – – –

1. No modeling of phase errors was carried out at 92 cm. 2. The area-loss coefficients are denoted

η = ησηϕ, where ησ characterizes losses due to random errors with the rms deviation σ and ηϕ characterizes losses due to systematic quadratic errors ϕq, due primarily to the feed. 3. Model 1: AFA at the focus. The main phase errors in the dish aperture are determined by a) random errors with the projected rms deviation for the actual dish surface from an ideal parabolic surface σ =0.77 mm and b)

systematic quadratic phase errors over the dish with the maximum value ϕq, due to the calculated phase beam of the feed having an error δΨmax for illumination of the antenna edge. 4. Model 2: AFA not at the

focus. A modest quadratic phase error δϕx is added to Model 1, due to a longitudinal shift of the feed from the dish focus by 5 mm. 5. Model 3: astigmatism of the feed at 1.35 cm. The single feed phase center at

1.35 cm in Model 2 “splits” into two equivalent phase centers separated by a distance δ11 + δ12 in the orthogonal planes. More precisely, the phase center splits into two “optimal centers of focus in the main planes”, since the concept of a phase center refers to the idealized co-phased case of illumination by a spherical wave (by definition) [50, 51, 53], whereas the phase front is usually far from co-phased in practice.

The additional phase error with the same magnitude δϕx is due to the longitudinal shift of the average between these centers from the dish focus. 47

over the aperture due to 1) differences be- of the phase from the center of the aperture tween the real antenna reflecting surface and toward the edge due to the lack of coincidence an ideal parabolic surface, 2) longitudinal and between the dish focus and the feed centerof transverse shifts of the feed from the dish fo- focus (with even and odd functions relative to cus, and 3) peculiarities of the amplitude– the center of the aperture, respectively), and phase beam of the feed (including, for ex- k =2π/λ is the wavenumber. A plus sign in ample, different widths of the real amplitude front of δ1 in (A.3) corresponds to a shift δ1 of beam of the feed in orthogonal planes, with the feed phase center from the focus toward the effective width of the illumination of the the dish, while a minus sign corresponds to a ideal dish being equal to the projected value shift from the dish. in one plane, but a factor of two worse in the The maximum phase incursion is reached other plane, or astigmatism of the feed, when at the edge of the aperture, with ψ = ◦ the dish focus and feed center of focus are ψ0 = 60 for the SRT. Thus, we can ne- close to each other in one plane but in appre- glect terms with δΨ(ψ) and δ3 in (A.3). As- ciably different positions in the other plane). suming k δ2 sin ψ0 = ϕq 1.5π, we ob- The phase distribution of the field ϕ(x) at tain the rough| | estimate for∼ the transverse a point 0 x R in a dish aperture with ra- shift δ 12 mm. Analogously, assuming ≤ ≤ 0 | 2| ∼ dius R0 can be written [54] ϕ(x)=Φ(x) Φ0, k δ (1 cos ψ ) = ϕ yields the estimate − | 1| − 0 q where Φ(x) and Φ0 are the initial field phases of the longitudinal shift δ1 20 mm, and at the point x and at the center of the aper- the estimate for the maximum| | ∼ distance be- ture. Φ(x) = Ψ(ψ)+ k(ρ + t) and is deter- tween the feed phase center and dish focus mined by the phase of the feed beam Ψ(ψ) δ = (δ2 + δ2)1/2 23 mm. On the other max 1 2 ∼ (0 ψ ψ0; here, ψ is the angle from hand, if the main contribution in (A.3) is the≤ dish focus≤ between the points x = 0 and made by phase distortions of the feed beam, x R0 ) and the lengths of the path ρ from setting 2δΨ(ψ0) = ϕq 1.5π yields the es- the≤ feed to the dish and the path t from the timate for the maximum∼ feed phase error at dish to the aperture (k is the wavenumber). the edge of the dish required for this δΨ(ψ = Therefore, Φ(x) is a function of the phase 60◦) 0.75π = 135◦. beam of the feed, the dish profile (with the Let∼ us estimate the phase errors in the deviation δ3 of the surface from an ideal sur- antenna-feeder system in a simple model (Ta- face), and the shift of the feed phase center ble 3), based on the computational data [56] relative to the paraboloid focus (by δ1 in the for the amplitude–phase beams of the SRT longitudinal and δ2 in the transverse direction feeds and the projected rms deviation for the relative to the antenna axis). The deviations dish surface compared to an ideal parabolic of these factors from their projected values surface σ = 0.77 mm. Let us consider three give rise to a total deviation of the phase dis- types of model: tribution at the dish aperture from the pro- 1) the AFA is at the focus, jected (in the ideal case, close to co-phased) 2) the AFA is not at the focus, value δϕ(x), and can be estimated with suffi- 3) the AFA at 1.35 cm has astigmatism. cient accuracy for our purposes as [54] Astigmatism is disregarded in models 1 and 2. It follows from the data of [56] that, δϕ(x)=2δΨ(ψ)+ k[ δ1(1 cos ψ) at each of the wavelengths 1.35, 6.2, and 18 ± − δ sin ψ 2δ (1 + cos(ψ/2)]. A.3 cm − 2 − 3 1) the phase Φ0 on the beam axis varies Here, in the general case, δΨ(ψ) contains ran- with the azimuthal angle α as Φ0 α, and dom and systematic deviations of the feed is shifted by π/2 in the orthogonal∝ planes 1 phase beam. The term with δ3 is associated and 2; with inaccuracy of the dish surface, the terms 2) in each azimuthal plane, the phase can with δ1 and δ2 reflect a systematic “incursion” be approximated using identical quadratic 48

equations relative to the beam axis (dish cen- scribed using an approximation in which the ter), with the maximum illumination errors feed has two centers of focus (centers 1 and 2 ◦ at the dish edge equal to δΨmax 100 of in planes 1 and 2) that are shifted along the phase at 1.35 cm and 35◦ of phase≈ − at 6.2 focal axis in opposite directions from the dish − and 18 cm. focus by distances δ11 (center 1, toward the We thus find that dish) and δ12 (center 2, away from the dish). 1) there may be astigmatism of the feed Then, using (A.3), the phase errors in planes that transforms the phase center into a 1 and 2 will be δϕ1 = δΨmax+kδ11c and δϕ2 = ◦ “phase line” along the feed axis; δΨmax kδ12c, where c = (1 cos60 )=1/2 2) a quadratic phase error in the illumi- and the− total phase error in− the aperature is ◦ nation of the dish edge at 1.35 cm ( 100 ) ϕq = δϕ1 + δϕ2 =2δΨmax +(δ11 δ12)π/λ. may be close to the value required to explain− Hence, setting Ψ = 100−◦, δϕ = 0, max − 1 the measured effective area [δΨmax = δΨ(ψ = and δϕ2 = 1.5π, we finally obtain self- 60◦) 135◦]; consistent estimates− for the phase distortions 3)≈ if − the feed had a single phase center required to explain both the measured effec- that coincided with the dish focus (δ1 = 0, tive area and the ellipticity of the SRT beam; δϕx = 0) or was shifted from the focus away the corresponding shifts of the centers of fo- from the dish along the axis a distance δ1 = cus of the feed 1 and 2 are in opposite di- δϕ /[k (1 cos 60◦)] (so that δϕ 70◦), rections from the dish focus: ϕ = 1.5π, x · − x ≈ − q − then, according to (A.3), the phase error in δ11 = 7.5 mm and δ12 = 13 mm (Table 3). the aperture δϕmax =2δΨmax + δϕx would be The distance between these centers is b = ◦ ◦ δϕmax 200 or δϕmax 270 , and the δ11 +δ12 20 mm, and the shift of the overall corresponding∼ − loss coefficient∼ − for the effective equivalent∼ center of focus from the dish focus area would be η 0.27 or η 0.15 (see Mod- is ∆x = (δ11 δ12)/2 3 mm (away from els 1 and 2 in Table∼ 3 for more∼ detail). the dish), due− to the asymmetry∼ − in the posi- Thus, the observed reduction in area at tions of center 1 and center 2 relative to the 1.35 cm (in addition to the expected reduc- focus. tion from the ideal case due to the fact that Since the presence of appreciable asym- σ = 0) can be explained nearly fully by these metry in the shape of the main lobe of the calculated6 quadratic phase distortions in the beam in plane 2 (where its width is larger) SRT feed beam, according to the data of [56]. requires a contribution from coma-type aber- However, in both models, the quadratic ration, this suggests the presence of a trans- phase errors are the same and large in planes verse shift of one of the feed phase centers 1 an 2. This means that such errors can ex- relative to the focal axis of the antenna, with plain the increase in the width of the main a maximum cubic error π/2. More precise lobe of the beam, but not its ellipticity. conclusions about the origins∼ of the observed Model 3 solves the problem of this elliptic- beam characteristics will require rigorous cal- ity as well. For simplicity, we will assume that culations and a comparative analysis of the the real astigmatism of the feed can be de- main possible models.

[1] L. I. Matveenko, N. S. Kardashev, and L. A. Gorshkov, G. A. Dolgopolov, G. B. Sholomitskii, Soviet Radiophys. 8, Yu. I. Danilov, M. B. Zakson, N. S. Kar- 461 (1965). dashev, V. V. Klimashin, V. I. Ko- [2] N. S. Kardashev, Yu. N. Pariiskii, and marov, N. P. Mel’nikov, G. S. Nari- N. D. Umarbaeva, Astrofiz. Issled. 5, 16 manov, O. F. Prilutskii, A. S. Pshen- (1973). nikov, V. G. Rodin, V. A. Rudakov, [3] V. I. Buyakas, A. S. Gvamichava, A. I. Savin, R. Z. Sagdeev, Yu. P. Semenov, 49

A. G. Sokolov, V. I. Usyukin, K. P. Feoktis- search, 46, 466 (2012). tov, G. S. Tsarevskii, and I. S. Shklovskii, [24] Lavochkin Scientific and Production Asso- Kosmich. Issled. 16, 767 (1978). ciation, http://www.laspace.ru/ [4] N. W. Broten, T. H. Legg, J. L. Locke, et [25] RadioAstron User Handbook. al., Science 156, 1592 (1967). http://www.ascrssi.ru/radioastron/documents/rauh [5] C. Bare, B. G. Clark, K. I. Kellermann, et [26] V. Yu. Avdeev, A. V. Alakoz, Yu. A. Alek- al., Science 157, 189 (1967). sandrov, et al., Vestn. FGUP NPO im. [6] K. I. Kellermann, B. G. Clark, C. C. Bare, S.A. Lavochkina, No 3, 4 (2012). et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 153, L209 (1968). [27] G. N. Zastenker, L. M. Zelenyi, [7] J. Gubbay, A. J. Legg, D. S. Robertson, et A. A. Petrukovich, et al., Vestn. FGUP al., Nature 222, 730 (1969). NPO im. S.A. Lavochkina, No 3, 22 (2012). [8] K. I. Kellermann, D. L. Jauncey, M. H. Co- [28] Yu. A. Aleksandrov, A. N. Kotik, hen, et al., Astrophys. J. 169, 1 (1971). N. V. Myshonkova, and S. D. Fedorchuk, [9] D. D. Broderik, V. V. Vitkevich, in Radioastronomical Tools and Tech- D. L. Dzhonsi, et al., Sov. Astron. 14, niques, Ed. by N. S. Kardashev and 627 (1970). R. D. Dagkesamanskii (Cambridge Scien- [10] L.I. Matveenko, Soobshch. IPA RAN tific, Cambridge, 2007), p. 69. No 176 (Inst. Prikl. Astron. RAN, St. Pe- [29] I. S. Vinogradov, in Radioastronomical terburg, 2007). Tools and Techniques, Ed. by N. S. Karda- [11] T. J. Pearson and A. C. S. Readhead, As- shev and R. D. Dagkesamanskii (Cambridge trophys. J. 328, 114 (1988). Scientific, Cambridge, 2007), p. 49. [12] Y. Y. Kovalev, K. I. Kellermann, M. L. Lis- [30] V. V. Andrejanov, L. I. Gurvits, N. S. Kar- ter, et al., Astron. J. 130, 2473 (2005). dashev, et al., in QUASAT: A VLBI Ob- [13] N. S. Kardashev, Yu. N. Pariiskii, and servatory in Space, ESA SP-213 (European A. G. Sokolov, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 104, 328 Space Agency, 1984), p. 161. (1971). [31] V. V. Andreyanov, A. V. Biriukov, [14] M. B. Zakson, N. S. Kardashev, A. I. Savin, V. I. Vasil’kov, et al., in Radioastronomical et al., Zemlya Vselennaya, No 4, 2 (1980). Tools and Techniques, Ed. by N. S. Karda- [15] V. M. Arsent’ev, V. I. Berzhatyi, shev and R. D. Dagkesamanskii (Cambridge V. A. Blagov, et al., Sov. Phys. Dokl. Scientific, Cambridge, 2007), p. 17. 27, 362 (1982). [32] R. F.C. Vessot, M. V. Levine, E. M. Matti- [16] Astro Space Center, Lebedev Physical In- son, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 2081 (1980). stitute, http://www.asc.rssi.ru/ [33] P. Waller, F. Gonzalez, J. Hahn, et al., in [17] G. S. Levy, R. P. Linfield, C. D. Edwards, Proc. 40th Precise Time and Time Inter- et al., Astrophys. J. 336, 1098 (1989). val Meeting (Reston, Virginia, USA, 2009), [18] R. P. Linfield, G. S. Levy, C. D. Edwards, p. 69. et al., Astrophys. J. 358, 350 (1990). [34] A. V. Biriukov, in Radioastronomical Tools [19] H. Hirabayashi, H. Hirosawa, H. Kobayashi, and Techniques, Ed. by N. S. Kardashev et al., Science 281, 1825 (1998). and R. D. Dagkesamanskii (Cambridge Sci- [20] H. Hirabayashi, H. Hirosawa, H. Kobayashi, entific, Cambridge, 2007), p. 57. et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 52, 955 [35] N. S. Kardashev, B. B. Kreisman, and (2000). Yu. N. Ponomarev, in Radioastronomical [21] V. V. Khartov, Solar System Research, 46, Tools and Techniques, Ed. by N. S. Karda- 451 (2012). shev and R. D. Dagkesamanskii (Cambridge [22] Yu. A. Aleksandrov et al., Solar System Re- Scientific, Cambridge, 2007), p. 3. search, 46, 458 (2012). [36] R. J. Eanes, B. Schutz, and B. Tapley, [23] Yu. A. Aleksandrov et al., Solar System Re- in Proc. 9th International Symposium on 50

Earth Tides (E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlag- [50] R. C. Hansen, Microwave Scanning An- Buchhandlung, Stuttgart, 1983), p. 239. tenna (Academic, New York, 1964; Sov. Ra- [37] W. M. Folkner, J. G. Williams and dio, Moscow, 1966), vol. 1. D. H. Boggs, The Planetary and Lu- [51] G. Z. Aizenberg, UHF Antennas (Svyaz’, nar Ephemeris DE-421. JPL Memorandum Moscow, 1957, 1977) [in Russian]. IOM 343R08003 (2008). [52] U. Christiansen, I. Hogbom, Radio [38] F. G. Lemoine, S. C. Kenyon, J. K. Fac- Teleskopes (Cambridge Univ. Press, New tor, et al., The Development of the York, 1969; Mir, Moscow, 1972). Joint NASA GSFC and the National [53] G. K. Galimov, Reflector Scanning Anten- Imagery and Mapping Agency Geopo- nas (Advansed Solutions, Moscow, 2010), tential Model egm96 (NASA, 1998). Vol. 2 [in Russian]. http://bowie.gsfc.nasa.gov/697/staff/lemoine/EGM96_[54] Yu. V.NASA-TP-1998-206861.pdf Shubarin, UHF Antennas [39] D. A. Duev, C. G. Molera, (Khar’kovsk. Univ., Khar’kov, 1960) S. V. Pogrebenko, et al., Astron. As- [in Russian]. trophys. 541, A43 (2012). [55] A. M. Tseitlin, Antenna Techniques and [40] M. V. Sazhin, V. Yu. Vlasov O. S. Sazhina, Radio Astronomy (Sov. Radio, Moscow, and V. G. Turyshev, Astron. Rep. 54, 959 1976) [in Russian]. (2010). [56] Numerical Calculation of the SRT AFA Ra- [41] I. E. Molotov, V. M. Agapov, diation Pattern at 1.35, 6.2 and 18 cm, V. V. Kupriyanov et al., Izv. Gl. As- Appendix to Design Documentation (ASC, tron. Observ. Pulkovo 219 (1), 239 (2009). Moscow, 2012) [in Russian]. [42] IAU Minor Planet Center. [57] A. D. Kuzmin and A. E. Salomonovich, Ra- http://www.minorplanet-center.net/iau/DASO/DASO.htmdioastronomicall Methods of Antenna Mea- [43] N. A. Esepkina, D. V. Korol’kov, and surements (Sov. Radio, Moscow, 1964; Aca- Yu. N. Pariiskii, Radio Telescopes and Ra- demic Press, New York, 1966). diometers (Nauka, Moscow, 1973) [in Rus- [58] K. Hachisuka, A. Brunthaler, sian]. K. M. Menten, et al., Astrophys. J. 645, [44] A. R. Thompson, J. M. Moran, and 337 (2006). G. W. Swenson, Jr., Interferometry and [59] T. Hirota, T. Bushimata, Y. K. Choi, et al., Synthesis in Radio Astronomy (Wiley, New Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 59, 897 (2007). York, 2001; Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2003). [60] T. Shimoikura, H. Kobayashi, T. Omadaka, [45] Y. Y. Kovalev, N. A. Nizhelsky, Yu. A. Ko- et al., Astrophys. J. 634, 459 (2005). valev, et al., Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. [61] A. Tolmachev, Astron. Tel. No. 3177 (2011). 139, 545 (1999). [62] E. E. Bloemhof, M. J. Reid, and [46] Yu. A. Kovalev, V. I. Vasil’kov, J. M. Moran, Astrophys. J. 397, 500 (1992). A. V. Biryukov, and N. Ya. Nikolaev, [63] K. G. Belousov and S. F. Likhachev, in Ra- in Proceedings of the All-Russia Astronom- dioastronomical Tools and Techniques, Ed. ical Conference (Spets. Astrofiz. Observ. by N. S. Kardashev and R. D. Dagke- RAN, Nizhnii Arkhyz, 2010), p. 32. samanskii (Cambridge Scientific, Cam- [47] Report on Radio Astronomical Ground bridge, 2007), p. 95. Tests of the SRT in Pushchino (AKTs [64] A. R. Whitney, ASP Conf. Ser. 306, 123 FIAN, Moscow, 2004) [in Russian]. (2003). [48] J. W. M. Baars, R. Genzel, I. I. K. Pauliny- [65] The RadioAstron Newsletter . Toth, and A. Witzel, Astron. Astrophys. http://www.asc.rssi.ru/radioastron/news/news.htm 61, 99 (1977). [66] A. Wolszczan and J. M. Cordes, Astrophys. [49] Institut of Radioastronomy of Max Plank J. Lett. 320, L35 (1987). (MPIFR, Bonn, Germany). [67] M. J. Valtonen, H. J. Lehto, L. O. Takalo, 51

and A. Sillan¨a¨a, Astrophys. J. 729, 33 (2011). [68] K. I. Kellermann and I. I. K. Pauliny-Toth, Astrophys. J. Lett. 155, 71 (1969). [69] M. H. Cohen, M. L. Lister, D. C. Homan, et al., Astrophys. J. 658, 232 (2007). 52

FIG. 4: (Color inset 1). See full caption on a separate page below. 53

FIG. 7: (Color inset 2). See full caption on a separate page below. 54

Figure 4 (color inster 1) caption: (a) Tests of the precision carbon-fiber panels of the radio-telescope reflector at ESTEC in 1994 (Nordwijk, the Netherlands). (b) Memorial plate with a portrait of the first radio astronomer Grote Reber (1911–2002) mounted on the SRT. (c,d) Final ground tests of the SRT with the Navigator module were carried out at the Lavochkin Association right up to the transport of the spacecraft to the cosmodrome. Panel (d) shows the antenna of the SRT in the folded state; the 1.5-m antenna of the HDRRC and some of the solar panels are also visible. (e) Tests of a model of the SRT and interferometer at the PRAO (ASC) in 2003–2004. (f) Image of the SRT with logos of the organizations and flags of the countries participating in the RadioAstron project on the rocket fairing of the Zenit-3F complex. (g)–(h) Transport of the rocket with the Spektr-R spacecraft and the Fregat booster at the launch pad of site No. 45 of the Baikonur cosmodrome. (i) Launch on July 18, 2011 at 5:31:19.91 Moscow daylight savings time. (j) Artist’s impression of the SRT in orbit after it had successfully deployed on July 23, 2011.

Figure 7 (color inset 2) caption: (a) Radiometric responses of the telescope during the first observation of the radio source Casseoipeia A with the SRT in flight, on September 27, 2011, at 92 and 18 cm in left- and right-circular polarizations. The two scans to the left were made for one cut through the source (in the forward and reverse directions), the two scans to the right were made perpendicular to this but, and the middle scan shows a cut through the edge of the object made during repointing of the antenna. The short pulses are responses to calibration signals from the receivers. (b) Example of radiometric responses of the SRT to a source during scanning of a portion of sky containing the Crab Nebula simultaneously at two wavelengths — 1.35 cm (in both polarizations) and 6.2 cm (in one polarization) — for observations with the SRT in a single-dish regime obtained on October 17, 2011. (c) First signal obtained at the ASC from the space–ground radio interferometer at 18 cm, for observations of the quasar 0212+735 made by the SRT and the 100-m Effelsberg radio telescope (Germany) on November 15, 2011. (d) Response of the space–ground interferometer (in units of the signal-to-noise ratio) for 6.2-cm observations of the quasar OJ287 on April 6, 2012. The projected baseline between the SRT and Effelsberg was B = 7.2 Earth diameters. (e) Interferometer response for observations of narrow water lines at 1.35 cm in maser sources in the star-forming region W51 obtained for observations made by the SRT and the Effelsberg telescope on May 12, 2012. The projected baseline is B =1.14 Earth diameters (14500 km), corresponding to an angular resolution of about 0.0002 arcsec. The integration time was 120 s. The vertical axis plots the correlation coefficient for the interferometer response as a function of the observing frequency and the fringe rate. (f) Four-antenna interferometric observations of a single pulse from the pulsar PSR B0950+08 made on January 25, 2012, involving the SRT and the Arecibo (Puerto Rico, USA), Westerbork (Netherlands), and Effelsberg (Germany) ground radio telescopes. The projected baseline is 220 000 km. (g) Same as (f) for the accumulation of a long series of pulses. The variation of the signal with time over an hour is clearly visible.