DOCSLIB.ORG

A Direction Finding System Using Log Periodic Dipole Antennas in a Sparsely Sampled Linear Array

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Direction Finding System Using Log Periodic Dipole Antennas in a Sparsely Sampled Linear Array Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2010 A Direction Finding System Using Log Periodic Dipole Antennas in a Sparsely Sampled Linear Array Jonathan Andrew Weldon Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Repository Citation Weldon, Jonathan Andrew, "A Direction Finding System Using Log Periodic Dipole Antennas in a Sparsely Sampled Linear Array" (2010). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 351. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/351 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A DIRECTION FINDING SYSTEM USING LOG PERIODIC DIPOLE ANTENNAS IN A SPARSELY SAMPLED LINEAR ARRAY A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering By JONATHAN ANDREW WELDON B.S., Texas Christian University, 2006 2010 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES April 02, 2010 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISIONBY Jonathan Andrew Weldon ENTITLED A Direction Finding System Using Log Periodic Dipole Antennas in a Sparsely Sampled Linear Array BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in Engineering. __________________________________ Ray Siferd, Ph.D. Thesis Director __________________________________ Kefu Xue, Ph.D. Department Chair Committee on Final Examination __________________________________ Ray Siferd, Ph.D. __________________________________ Ronald Riechers, Ph.D. __________________________________ Saiyu Ren, Ph.D. __________________________________ Marian Kazimierczuk, Ph.D. __________________________________ John A. Bantle, Ph.D. Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies and Interim Dean of Graduate Studies ABSTRACT Weldon, Jonathan Andrew. M.S.Egr. , Department of Electrical Engineering, Wright State University, 2010. A Direction Finding System Using Log Periodic Dipole Antennas in a Sparsely Sampled Linear Array. This thesis explores the use of wide band log periodic dipole array (LPDA) antennas in direction finding systems. A wide band log periodic antenna will be constructed and tested to ensure hardware capability. A novel approach utilizing non-uniform spacing in a linear array will be used to improve the spatial resolution of the direction finding system. These specialized linear arrays are known as minimum redundancy or non- redundant linear arrays. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Thesis Motivation ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Thesis Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 2. Phased Array Antennas ........................................................................................................... 2 2.1. Theory of Phased Array Antennas .................................................................................. 2 2.2 Design of a Phased Array Antenna ................................................................................. 3 3. Log Periodic Dipole Array.................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Theory of the Planar Log Periodic Dipole Array (LPDA) ........................................... 10 3.2 Design of a Log Period Dipole Array ........................................................................... 11 4. Modeling and Simulation ...................................................................................................... 30 4.1 Log Periodic Dipole Array Modeling ..................................................................................... 30 4.2 Phased Array Simulation ........................................................................................................ 40 5. Results ................................................................................................................................... 44 5.1. Planar Log Periodic Dipole Array Results .................................................................... 44 5.2. Phase Array Results ...................................................................................................... 61 6. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 65 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................. 67 Appendix A -- MatLab Code ........................................................................................................ 68 Appendix B -- NEC Code ............................................................................................................. 74 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Plot of Uniform, Minimum, and Non-Redundant Array Configuration Angular Resolutions ULA refers to a Uniform Linear Array, MRA refers to a Minimum Redundancy Array, and NRA refers to a Non Redundant Array ....................................... 8 Figure 2 Log Periodic Dipole Array ................................................................................. 11 Figure 3 Constant Directivity Contours ............................................................................ 12 Figure 4 Nomograph for Truncation Coefficient K1 ........................................................ 14 Figure 5 Nomograph for Truncation Coefficient K2 ....................................................... 14 Figure 6 (a) Pictorial representation of two-plane stripline LPDA. .................................. 17 Figure 7 Graphical Representation of Incident and Reflected Waves at Balun ............... 18 Figure 8 Klopfenstein Taper-- Z1 and Z2 are impedances, x represents the independent axis and L the overall length; ρ is the reflection coefficient along the x-axis ............... 19 Figure 9 Plot of the Klopfenstein Taper Impedance Curve .............................................. 26 Figure 10 Planar LPDA Antenna Planes .......................................................................... 28 Figure 11 Klopfenstein Taper with Zoomed Taper End ................................................... 29 Figure 12 Front View of the LPDA in NEC 3-D Viewer ................................................. 31 Figure 13 Isometric View of the LPDA in NEC 3-D Viewer........................................... 32 Figure 14 Alternating Elements along the Two Feed Lines ............................................. 33 Figure 15 Field Pattern of Antenna Gain @ 2.5 GHz. ...................................................... 36 Figure 16 Field Pattern of Antenna Gain @ 2.5 GHz. ...................................................... 37 Figure 17 Field Pattern of Antenna Gain @ 2.5 GHz. ...................................................... 38 Figure 18 Field Pattern of Antenna Gain @ 2.5 GHz. ...................................................... 39 v Figure 19 Element Uniform Array vs. 5-Element Minimum Redundancy Array ............ 40 Figure 20 5-Element General Minimum Redundancy Array vs. 5-Element Minimum Redundancy Array ............................................................................................................ 41 Figure 21 Array factors for four 5-Element Arrays detailing the Uniform, Non-Redundant and both Minimum Redundancy cases. ............................................................................ 42 Figure 22 NEC Log Periodic Dipole Array Pattern Multiplied with Sparse Array Factors ........................................................................................................................................... 43 Figure 23 Planar Log Period Dipole Array ....................................................................... 45 Figure 24 Completed Log Periodic Dipole Array with Stripline ...................................... 46 Figure 25 Image of the Firing End of the Antenna ........................................................... 47 Figure 26 Image of Stripline Launcher Connected to the Antenna .................................. 47 Figure 27 Voltage Standing Wave Ratio Measurement for the First LPDA from 1-4 GHz ........................................................................................................................................... 49 Figure 28 Voltage Standing Wave Ratio Measurement for the Second LPDA from 1-4 GHz ................................................................................................................................... 50 Figure 29 Voltage Standing Wave Ratio Measurement for the First LPDA from 2.5-3.5 GHz ................................................................................................................................... 51 Figure 30 Voltage Standing Wave Ratio Measurement for the Second LPDA from 2.5-3.5 GHz ................................................................................................................................... 52 Figure 31 First Antenna at 2.6 GHz .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 22 Fundamentalfundamental Propertiesproperties Ofof Antennasantennas
    ChapterChapter 22 FundamentalFundamental PropertiesProperties ofof AntennasAntennas ECE 5318/6352 Antenna Engineering Dr. Stuart Long 1 .. IEEEIEEE StandardsStandards . Definition of Terms for Antennas . IEEE Standard 145-1983 . IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation Vol. AP-31, No. 6, Part II, Nov. 1983 2 ..RadiationRadiation PatternPattern (or(or AntennaAntenna Pattern)Pattern) “The spatial distribution of a quantity which characterizes the electromagnetic field generated by an antenna.” 3 ..DistributionDistribution cancan bebe aa . Mathematical function . Graphical representation . Collection of experimental data points 4 ..QuantityQuantity plottedplotted cancan bebe aa . Power flux density W [W/m²] . Radiation intensity U [W/sr] . Field strength E [V/m] . Directivity D 5 . GraphGraph cancan bebe . Polar or rectangular 6 . GraphGraph cancan bebe . Amplitude field |E| or power |E|² patterns (in linear scale) (in dB) 7 ..GraphGraph cancan bebe . 2-dimensional or 3-D most usually several 2-D “cuts” in principle planes 8 .. RadiationRadiation patternpattern cancan bebe . Isotropic Equal radiation in all directions (not physically realizable, but valuable for comparison purposes) . Directional Radiates (or receives) more effectively in some directions than in others . Omni-directional nondirectional in azimuth, directional in elevation 9 ..PrinciplePrinciple patternspatterns . E-plane . H-plane Plane defined by H-field and Plane defined by E-field and direction of maximum direction of maximum radiation radiation (usually coincide with principle planes of the coordinate system) 10 Coordinate System Fig. 2.1 Coordinate system for antenna analysis. 11 ..RadiationRadiation patternpattern lobeslobes . Major lobe (main beam) in direction of maximum radiation (may be more than one) . Minor lobe - any lobe but a major one . Side lobe - lobe adjacent to major one .
    [Show full text]
  • Radiometry and the Friis Transmission Equation Joseph A
    Radiometry and the Friis transmission equation Joseph A. Shaw Citation: Am. J. Phys. 81, 33 (2013); doi: 10.1119/1.4755780 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4755780 View Table of Contents: http://ajp.aapt.org/resource/1/AJPIAS/v81/i1 Published by the American Association of Physics Teachers Related Articles The reciprocal relation of mutual inductance in a coupled circuit system Am. J. Phys. 80, 840 (2012) Teaching solar cell I-V characteristics using SPICE Am. J. Phys. 79, 1232 (2011) A digital oscilloscope setup for the measurement of a transistor’s characteristic curves Am. J. Phys. 78, 1425 (2010) A low cost, modular, and physiologically inspired electronic neuron Am. J. Phys. 78, 1297 (2010) Spreadsheet lock-in amplifier Am. J. Phys. 78, 1227 (2010) Additional information on Am. J. Phys. Journal Homepage: http://ajp.aapt.org/ Journal Information: http://ajp.aapt.org/about/about_the_journal Top downloads: http://ajp.aapt.org/most_downloaded Information for Authors: http://ajp.dickinson.edu/Contributors/contGenInfo.html Downloaded 07 Jan 2013 to 153.90.120.11. Redistribution subject to AAPT license or copyright; see http://ajp.aapt.org/authors/copyright_permission Radiometry and the Friis transmission equation Joseph A. Shaw Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717 (Received 1 July 2011; accepted 13 September 2012) To more effectively tailor courses involving antennas, wireless communications, optics, and applied electromagnetics to a mixed audience of engineering and physics students, the Friis transmission equation—which quantifies the power received in a free-space communication link—is developed from principles of optical radiometry and scalar diffraction.
    [Show full text]
  • 25. Antennas II
    25. Antennas II Radiation patterns Beyond the Hertzian dipole - superposition Directivity and antenna gain More complicated antennas Impedance matching Reminder: Hertzian dipole The Hertzian dipole is a linear d << antenna which is much shorter than the free-space wavelength: V(t) Far field: jk0 r j t 00Id e ˆ Er,, t j sin 4 r Radiation resistance: 2 d 2 RZ rad 3 0 2 where Z 000 377 is the impedance of free space. R Radiation efficiency: rad (typically is small because d << ) RRrad Ohmic Radiation patterns Antennas do not radiate power equally in all directions. For a linear dipole, no power is radiated along the antenna’s axis ( = 0). 222 2 I 00Idsin 0 ˆ 330 30 Sr, 22 32 cr 0 300 60 We’ve seen this picture before… 270 90 Such polar plots of far-field power vs. angle 240 120 210 150 are known as ‘radiation patterns’. 180 Note that this picture is only a 2D slice of a 3D pattern. E-plane pattern: the 2D slice displaying the plane which contains the electric field vectors. H-plane pattern: the 2D slice displaying the plane which contains the magnetic field vectors. Radiation patterns – Hertzian dipole z y E-plane radiation pattern y x 3D cutaway view H-plane radiation pattern Beyond the Hertzian dipole: longer antennas All of the results we’ve derived so far apply only in the situation where the antenna is short, i.e., d << . That assumption allowed us to say that the current in the antenna was independent of position along the antenna, depending only on time: I(t) = I0 cos(t) no z dependence! For longer antennas, this is no longer true.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement Techniques and New Technologies for Satellite Monitoring
    Report ITU-R SM.2424-0 (06/2018) Measurement techniques and new technologies for satellite monitoring SM Series Spectrum management ii Rep. ITU-R SM.2424-0 Foreword The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of the radio- frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted. The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunication Sector are performed by World and Regional Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups. Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR) ITU-R policy on IPR is described in the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC referenced in Annex 1 of Resolution ITU-R 1. Forms to be used for the submission of patent statements and licensing declarations by patent holders are available from http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en where the Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC and the ITU-R patent information database can also be found. Series of ITU-R Reports (Also available online at http://www.itu.int/publ/R-REP/en) Series Title BO Satellite delivery BR Recording for production, archival and play-out; film for television BS Broadcasting service (sound) BT Broadcasting service (television) F Fixed service M Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services P Radiowave propagation RA Radio astronomy RS Remote sensing systems S Fixed-satellite service SA Space applications and meteorology SF Frequency sharing and coordination between fixed-satellite and fixed service systems SM Spectrum management Note: This ITU-R Report was approved in English by the Study Group under the procedure detailed in Resolution ITU-R 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Evaluation of Array Antennas
    International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) www.ijmer.com Vol.1, Issue.2, pp-510-515 ISSN: 2249-6645 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ARRAY ANTENNAS K.Ch.sri Kavya1 , Y.N.Sandhya Devi2 ,G.Sudheer Kumar2 , Narendra Neupane2 1(Associate Professor, Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KL University.) 2 PERFORMANCE(B.Tech Scholars, Dept. of EVALUATION Electronics and Communication OF Engineering, ARRAY KL University.) ANTENNAS ABSTRACT The purpose of the paper is to present a proper This paper will presents an optimization technique to reduce the side lobe level in the case normalization technique to obtain a low side lobe of linear array antennas. There several methods level and to avoid loss in main lobe directivity. are introduced for the side lobe reduction .But always the basic trade-off occur when II.METHODOLOGIES implementing amplitude weighting functions is that a trade between low side lobe levels and a loss A. Uniform Illumination method in main beam directivity always results . Here we Equal illumination at every element in an array made a comparison of three methods namely referred to as uniform illumination, results in uniform illumination method , Taylor line source directivity patterns with three distinct features. attenuation method and Taylor line source using Firstly, uniform illumination gives the highest redistribution method .The paper also presents aperture efficiency possible of 100% or 0 dB, for any different source distributions and their respective given aperture area. Secondly, the first side lobes for directivity patterns. a linear/rectangular aperture have peaks of approximately –13.1 dB relative to the main beam Keywords: Amplitude weighing, uniform peak; and the first side lobes for a circular aperture illumination, array antennas, normalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockage and Directivity in 60 Ghz Wireless Personal Area Networks
    1 Blockage and Directivity in 60 GHz Wireless Personal Area Networks: From Cross-Layer Model to Multihop MAC Design Sumit Singh, Student Member, IEEE, Federico Ziliotto, Upamanyu Madhow, Fellow, IEEE, Elizabeth M. Belding, Senior Member, IEEE, and Mark Rodwell, Fellow, IEEE Abstract—We present a cross-layer modeling and design ap- of multimedia content) between devices such as cameras, proach for multiGigabit indoor wireless personal area networks camcorders, personal computers and televisions, as well as (WPANs) utilizing the unlicensed millimeter (mm) wave spectrum real-time streaming of both compressed and uncompressed in the 60 GHz band. Our approach accounts for the following two characteristics that sharply distinguish mm wave networking high definition television (HDTV). This convergence of these from that at lower carrier frequencies. First, mm wave links are hardware and application trends has fueled intense efforts in inherently directional: directivity is required to overcome the both research and standardization for mm wave communica- higher path loss at smaller wavelengths, and it is feasible with tion [1]–[9]. However, the eventual success of these efforts compact, low-cost circuit board antenna arrays. Second, indoor depends on system designs that account for the fundamental mm wave links are highly susceptible to blockage because of the limited ability to diffract around obstacles such as the human differences between mm wave communication and existing body and furniture. We develop a diffraction-based model to wireless networks at lower carrier frequencies (e.g., from determine network link connectivity as a function of the locations 900 MHz to 5 GHz). In particular, the goal of this paper of stationary and moving obstacles.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Radiation Properties of the Antenna As a Function of Space Coordinates
    LECTURE 4: Fundamental Antenna Parameters (Radiation pattern. Pattern beamwidths. Radiation intensity. Directivity. Gain. Antenna efficiency and radiation efficiency. Frequency bandwidth. Input impedance and radiation resistance. Antenna equivalent area. Relationship between directivity and area.) The antenna parameters describe the antenna performance with respect to space distribution of the radiated energy, power efficiency, matching to the feed circuitry, etc. Many of these parameters are interrelated. There are several parameters not described here, such as antenna temperature and noise characteristics. They will be discussed later in conjunction with radiowave propagation and system performance. 1. Radiation pattern The radiation pattern (RP) (or antenna pattern) is the representation of the radiation properties of the antenna as a function of space coordinates. The RP is measured in the far-field region, where the spatial (angular) distribution of the radiated power does not depend on the distance. One can measure and plot the field intensity, e.g. ∼ E ()θ ,ϕ , or the received power 2 E ()θϕ, 2 ∼ =η H ()θ ,ϕ η The trace of the spatial variation of the received/radiated power at a constant radius from the antenna is called the power pattern. The trace of the spatial variation of the electric (magnetic) field at a constant radius from the antenna is called the amplitude field pattern. Usually, the pattern describes the normalized field (power) values with respect to the maximum value. Note: The power pattern and the amplitude field pattern are the same when computed and plotted in dB. 1 The pattern can be a 3-D plot (both θ and ϕ vary), or a 2-D plot.
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE 4: Fundamental Antenna Parameters (Radiation Pattern
    LECTURE 4: Fundamental Antenna Parameters (Radiation pattern. Pattern beamwidths. Radiation intensity. Directivity. Gain. Antenna efficiency and radiation efficiency. Frequency bandwidth. Input impedance and radiation resistance. Antenna effective area. Relationship between directivity and antenna effective area. Other antenna equivalent areas.) The antenna parameters describe the antenna performance with respect to space distribution of the radiated energy, power efficiency, matching to the feed circuitry, etc. Many of these parameters are interrelated. There are several parameters not described here, in particular, antenna temperature and noise characteristics. They are discussed later in conjunction with radio-wave propagation and system performance. 1. Radiation Pattern Definitions: The radiation pattern (RP) (or antenna pattern) is the representation of a radiation property of the antenna as a function of the angular coordinates. The trace of the angular variation of the received/radiated power at a constant radius from the antenna is called the power pattern. The trace of the angular variation of the magnitude of the electric (or magnetic) field at a constant radius from the antenna is called the amplitude field pattern. RPs are measured in the far-field region, where the angular distribution of the radiated power does not depend on the distance. We measure and plot either the field intensity, |E ( , ) |, or the power |E ( , ) |2 / = |H ( , ) |2 . Usually, the pattern describes the normalized field (or power) values with respect to the maximum value. Note: The power pattern and the amplitude field pattern are the same when computed and plotted in dB. The pattern can be a 3-D plot (both and vary), or a 2-D plot.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS Rules of Thumb
    ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS Rules of Thumb: 1. The Gain of an antenna with losses is given by: Where BW are the elev & az another is: 2 and N 4B0A 0 ' Efficiency beamwidths in degrees. G • Where For approximating an antenna pattern with: 2 A ' Physical aperture area ' X 0 8 G (1) A rectangle; X'41253,0 '0.7 ' BW BW typical 8 wavelength N 2 ' ' (2) An ellipsoid; X 52525,0typical 0.55 2. Gain of rectangular X-Band Aperture G = 1.4 LW Where: Length (L) and Width (W) are in cm 3. Gain of Circular X-Band Aperture 3 dB Beamwidth G = d20 Where: d = antenna diameter in cm 0 = aperture efficiency .5 power 4. Gain of an isotropic antenna radiating in a uniform spherical pattern is one (0 dB). .707 voltage 5. Antenna with a 20 degree beamwidth has a 20 dB gain. 6. 3 dB beamwidth is approximately equal to the angle from the peak of the power to Peak power Antenna the first null (see figure at right). to first null Radiation Pattern 708 7. Parabolic Antenna Beamwidth: BW ' d Where: BW = antenna beamwidth; 8 = wavelength; d = antenna diameter. The antenna equations which follow relate to Figure 1 as a typical antenna. In Figure 1, BWN is the azimuth beamwidth and BW2 is the elevation beamwidth. Beamwidth is normally measured at the half-power or -3 dB point of the main lobe unless otherwise specified. See Glossary. The gain or directivity of an antenna is the ratio of the radiation BWN BW2 intensity in a given direction to the radiation intensity averaged over Azimuth and Elevation Beamwidths all directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Antenna Characteristics Page 1
    Antenna Characteristics Page 1 Antenna Characteristics 1 Radiation Pattern The radiation pattern of an antenna is a graphical representation of the radiation properties of the antenna. Graphically, we surround the antenna by a sphere and evaluate the electric / magnetic fields (far field radiation fields) at a distance equal to the radius of the sphere. Figure 1: Radiated fields evaluated on an imaginary sphere surrounding a dipole [1] Usually we will focus on one field component (Eff or Hff ) radiated by the antenna. Usually we plot the dominant component of the E-field (e.g. Eθ for a dipole). This can be done by plotting the field component over all angles (θ; φ), yielding a 3D plot. For a dipole, this leads to the doughnut pattern in 3D because of the dependence of Eθ on sin θ. Figure 2: 3D radiation pattern of an ideal dipole [1] Usually, it is easier and more meaningful to plot a field in a number of principal planes in 2D in a polar plot. A plane containing the electric field vector is called the E-plane of the antenna. For a dipole, φ = constant is the E-plane; the constant can be any angle since there is no field variation with φ. The corresponding plot is a cross section of the doughnut: Similarly, a plane containing the H vector is called the H-plane. For the dipole, θ = 90◦ is appropriate: Prof. Sean Victor Hum Radio and Microwave Wireless Systems Antenna Characteristics Page 2 Figure 3: Radiation pattern of a dipole in the E-plane (polar form) [1] Figure 4: Radiation pattern of a dipole in the H-plane (polar form) [1] Since there is no variation of the radiated E/H fields with azimuth angle (φ), we call this type of antenna pattern omnidirectional 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Huge Wi-Fi Antenna Mistakes by Veli-Pekka Ketonen May 21, 2014
    10 Huge Wi-Fi Antenna Mistakes by Veli-Pekka Ketonen May 21, 2014 Mistake 1 • Access points with integrated omni-directional antennas (where the max gain is sideways) are placed among or above metal air ducts, grids and large lamp reflectors. • Outcome: A lot of reflections and refractions cause multiple copies of the signal to arrive at receivers, thereby dropping the data rates. As the radio waves reflect in random directions, the signal strength suffers at both ends. Mistake 2 • Access point integrated dipole antennas stick partially through a small hole in a metal ceiling panel, AP cover or metal grid. • Outcome: The antenna element has detuned and part of the energy is now directed upwards. Antennas protruding halfway in this manner create a total mess. Mistake 3 • An antenna element is placed on top of a ceiling panel made of unknown material with ɛr > 1. • Outcome: Antenna is detuned to another frequency, the radiation pattern and impedance matching are altered at the target operating frequency. Antenna gain becomes attenuation. Mistake 4 • Access points with standard omni-directional antennas are placed on a high ceilings — 4-5 meters high (13-16 feet.) • Outcome: Most of the energy is directed sideways towards other access points causing co-channel interference. Also, antenna gain shoots over the target area and data rates are reduced. Mistake 5 • Directional, high gain omni-directional antennas are used and placed on a high ceiling. • Outcome: These antennas have narrow beams pointing sideways, therefore, significant overshooting and even more co-channel interference takes place. Mistake 6 • Access points with omni-directional antennas are placed next to a thick wall.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual-Channel Speech Enhancement by Superdirective Beamforming
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing Volume 2006, Article ID 63297, Pages 1–14 DOI 10.1155/ASP/2006/63297 Dual-Channel Speech Enhancement by Superdirective Beamforming Thomas Lotter and Peter Vary Institute of Communication Systems and Data Processing, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany Received 31 January 2005; Revised 8 August 2005; Accepted 22 August 2005 In this contribution, a dual-channel input-output speech enhancement system is introduced. The proposed algorithm is an adap- tation of the well-known superdirective beamformer including postfiltering to the binaural application. In contrast to conventional beamformer processing, the proposed system outputs enhanced stereo signals while preserving the important interaural ampli- tude and phase differences of the original signal. Instrumental performance evaluations in a real environment with multiple speech sources indicate that the proposed computational efficient spectral weighting system can achieve significant attenuation of speech interferers while maintaining a high speech quality of the target signal. Copyright © 2006 T. Lotter and P. Vary. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 1. INTRODUCTION Griffiths-Jim beamformer [6], or extensions, for example, in [7, 8], is most widely known. Adaptive beamformers can be Speech enhancement by beamforming exploits spatial diver- considered less robust against distortions of the desired sig- sity of desired speech and interfering speech or noise sources nal than fixed beamformers. by combining multiple noisy input signals. Typical beam- Beamforming for binaural input signals, that is, signals former applications are hands-free telephony, speech recog- recorded by single microphones at the left and right ear, has nition, teleconferencing, and hearing aids.
    [Show full text]