Confronting 'Kymlicka's Dilemma': Settler Voting Rights, Indigenous Representation and the 1998-99 Electoral Reapportionment in Canada's Northwest Territories
Confronting 'Kymlicka's dilemma': settler voting rights, indigenous representation and the 1998-99 electoral reapportionment in Canada's Northwest Territories Item Type Thesis Authors Spitzer, Aaron Download date 10/10/2021 07:21:49 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/6077 CONFRONTING 'KYMLICKA'S DILEMMA': SETTLER VOTING RIGHTS, INDIGENOUS REPRESENTATION AND THE 1998-99 ELECTORAL REAPPORTIONMENT IN CANADAS NORTHWEST TERRITORIES RECOMMENDED: \IM AmyiLovecraft, Ph<D.| Graham White, Ph.D. lander, Ph.D. Advisory Committee Chair Mary Etirlander, Ph.D. Director, Northern Studies Program APPROVED: TodchSherman, M.F.A Deai/, C ollie of Ub£taf^rts fofin Efchelberger, PTi.D Dean of the^raduate Sch CONFRONTING ‘KYMLICKA’S DILEMMA': SETTLER VOTING RIGHTS, INDIGENOUS REPRESENTATION AND THE 1998-99 ELECTORAL REAPPORTIONMENT IN CANADA’S NORTHWEST TERRITORIES A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By Aaron John Spitzer, B.A. Fairbanks, AK August 2015 Abstract “Settler colonialism” presents a vexing challenge to voting rights theory and praxis in liberal-democratic states. I call this challenge “Kymlicka’s dilemma,” after Will Kymlicka, the political theorist who has led contemporary discourse on “minority nation” rights. As Kymlicka observed, members of a state’s dominant cultural nation, or staatsvolk, may, by exercising universal mobility rights, numerically “swamp,” and then, by using universal voting rights, democratically dominate, an Indigenous minority nation in its homeland. To prevent this, an Indigenous minority nation may seek to exercise group-based voting protections, such as guaranteed representation. Where “Kymlicka’s dilemma” arises - i.e., where minority group-differentiated voting protections challenge the voting powers of individual staatsvolk and vice versa - a constitutional conflict seems certain.
[Show full text]