Molecular Phylogenetics of the Riodinidae (Lepidoptera)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Molecular Phylogenetics of the Riodinidae (Lepidoptera) MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS OF THE RIODINIDAE (LEPIDOPTERA) By JONATHAN WALTER SAUNDERS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2010 1 © 2010 Jonathan Walter Saunders 2 To my Mom and Dad who fostered my love of the natural world and taught me the importance of education 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank the members of my committee for their encouragement and mentoring. And specifically I thank Dr. Tom Emmel for his multifaceted support and positive, uplifting spirit towards me, Dr. Charlie Baer for his generosity and forthrightness, and Dr. Mike Miyamoto for his patience, jokes, and ability to put my mind at ease about graduate school. I thank Mike Perry for all of his help getting me started on this project and Dr. J.D. Turner for sharing with me both his butterflies and his love and knowledge of them. I also thank Dr. Rebecca Kimball for allowing me to use her facilities and answering my questions as well as Dr. Ed Braun, Dr. David Reed, and Julie Allen for being so willing to help me with my many questions. I thank my wife for her loving patience and for her support which allowed me to finish my study. And, I thank God for the ability to study his world full of wonders. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF OBJECTS ......................................................................................................... 9 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................................... 10 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 12 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................ 29 Sequence Data Preparation.................................................................................... 29 Phylogenetic Analyses............................................................................................ 30 3 RESULTS ............................................................................................................... 39 Phylogenetics ......................................................................................................... 39 Myrmecophily.......................................................................................................... 40 4 DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................... 52 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................... 52 Phylogenetics and Gene Trees............................................................................... 56 Myrmecophily.......................................................................................................... 58 3G<2G<1G....................................................................................................... 59 The Hypotheses Are Not Independent ............................................................. 60 The Indirect Method ......................................................................................... 60 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 62 APPENDIX A COMPARISON OF 3 PARTITIONING SCHEMES FOR THE TOTAL EVIDENCE ANALYSES.......................................................................................... 69 B BAYESIAN TREES WITH POSTERIOR PROBABILITIES..................................... 70 C RANDOM TREES USED TO GENERATE A NULL DISTRIBUTION FOR THE MYRMECOPHILY HYPOTHESES ......................................................................... 74 5 D PROCEDURE FOR SCORING RANDOM TREES WITH A WORKED EXAMPLE............................................................................................................... 75 Procedure ............................................................................................................... 75 Worked Example .................................................................................................... 78 E SCORED RANDOM TREES................................................................................... 89 F RANDOM TREE NULL DISTRIBUTION RESULTS ............................................... 90 REFERENCE LIST........................................................................................................ 92 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH............................................................................................ 97 6 LIST OF TABLES Table page 1-1 Taxonomy of riodinid specimens for this study with their respective identification numbers......................................................................................... 22 2-2 Adapted PCR reaction components from (Niklas Wahlberg’s website: http://nymphalidae.utu.fi/Nymphalidae/Molecular.htm). ...................................... 35 2-3 Primers of genes sequenced and their respective sources ................................ 36 2-5 Sequences and accession numbers for three outgroups (denoted by *) and seven riodinids obtained from GenBank (Benson et al. 2006)............................ 38 3-1 Characteristics of the DNA sequence data......................................................... 42 3-2 Likelihood values and AIC values from RAxML likelihood analyses................... 43 3-3 Parsimony score statistics for 1G, 2G, and 3G when mapped onto 100 random trees. ..................................................................................................... 51 4-1 Parsimony scores from mapping gains and losses of myrmecophily onto the Myrmecophily Tree (Figure 4-2). ........................................................................ 65 4-2 Results from comparison of the hypotheses mapped on the Myrmecophily Tree next to the averages and 95% confidence intervals taken from random trees ................................................................................................................... 67 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 1-1 Phylogeny depicting evolutionary relationships of butterfly families adapted from Wahlberg et al. 2005. ................................................................................. 21 1-2 Diagram of caterpillar bodies comparing the auditory, feeding, and chemo- sensory emitting ant organs in three butterfly clades: Nymphidiini/Lemoniini, Eurybini, and Lycaenidae ................................................................................... 25 1-3 Subfamily and tribal relationships inferred from parsimony analysis on morphological data. This phylogeny is adapted from Harvey 1987. ................... 26 1-4 A parsimony phylogeny from Campbell et al. (2000) based on the wingless gene excluding third-position transitions with bootstrap support values less than 50% collapsed into a polytomy. .................................................................. 27 1-5 Two taxon sampling schema represented by A) and B) with the same number of taxa (and in this case, even the same topology). .............................. 28 3-1 RAxML most likely tree for the 3 genes combined and partitioned by gene and by codon position, higher taxa indicated by colored branches..................... 44 3-2 RAxML most likely trees for individual genes, higher taxa indicated by colored branches. ............................................................................................... 45 3-3 Consensuses of bootstrapped combined and individual RAxML trees (bootstraps indicated at nodes) .......................................................................... 46 3-4 50% majority rule consensus tree of the three most likely gene trees. ............... 50 4-1 Morphological phylogenetic hypothesis after Harvey 1987 including his subfamilies and tribes compared to my molecular phylogenetic hypothesis....... 64 4-2 The Myrmecophily Tree..................................................................................... 67 4-4 Adaptation of Campbell’s (1998) molecular phylogeny with myrmecophilous character state indicated by square next to genus. ............................................ 68 D-1 Example of how to mark a phylogeny as in step................................................. 75 D-3 Two interpretations of the evolution of myrmecophily based on the same tree. .......................................................................................................................... 76 D-4 Figure D-4. Further explanation for step 6) and 7).............................................. 77 D-5 Step by step method for scoring a random tree (here it is random tree number 94 which is the most complex................................................................ 78 8 LIST OF OBJECTS Object page C-1 Random Trees.................................................................................................... 74 E-1 Scans of 100 scored random trees..................................................................... 89 9 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) Q ⇑ Marianne Espeland A,B, , Jason P.W
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 93 (2015) 296–306 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Ancient Neotropical origin and recent recolonisation: Phylogeny, biogeography and diversification of the Riodinidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) q ⇑ Marianne Espeland a,b, , Jason P.W. Hall c, Philip J. DeVries d, David C. Lees e, Mark Cornwall a, Yu-Feng Hsu f, Li-Wei Wu g, Dana L. Campbell a,h, Gerard Talavera a,i,j, Roger Vila i, Shayla Salzman a, Sophie Ruehr k, David J. Lohman l, Naomi E. Pierce a a Museum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA b McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Powell Hall, 2315 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA c Department of Systematic Biology-Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-127, USA d Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, 2000 Lake Shore Drive, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA e Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK f Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan g The Experimental Forest, College of Bio-Resources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Nantou, Taiwan h Division of Biological Sciences, School of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, University of Washington Bothell, Box 358500, 18115 Campus Way NE, Bothell, WA 98011-8246, USA i Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta 37, 08003 Barcelona, Spain j Faculty of Biology & Soil Science, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) in a Heterogeneous Area Between Two Biodiversity Hotspots in Minas Gerais, Brazil
    ARTICLE Butterfly fauna (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) in a heterogeneous area between two biodiversity hotspots in Minas Gerais, Brazil Déborah Soldati¹³; Fernando Amaral da Silveira¹⁴ & André Roberto Melo Silva² ¹ Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Departamento de Zoologia, Laboratório de Sistemática de Insetos. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. ² Centro Universitário UNA, Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-5840. E-mail: [email protected] ³ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-2376. E-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author). ⁴ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2408-2656. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. This paper investigates the butterfly fauna of the ‘Serra do Rola-Moça’ State Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil. We eval- uate i) the seasonal variation of species richness and composition; and ii) the variation in composition of the local butterfly assemblage among three sampling sites and between the dry and rainy seasons. Sampling was carried out monthly between November 2012 and October 2013, using entomological nets. After a total sampling effort of 504 net hours, 311 species were recorded. One of them is endangered in Brazil, and eight are probable new species. Furthermore, two species were new records for the region and eight considered endemic of the Cerrado domain. There was no significant difference in species richness between the dry and the rainy seasons, however the species composition varies significantly among sampling sites. Due to its special, heterogeneous environment, which is home to a rich butterfly fauna, its preservation is important for the conservation of the regional butterfly fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Un Nouvel Eurybiini Du Genre Alesa De Guyane Française (Lepidoptera, Riodinidae)
    Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, 120 (4), 2015 : 453-456. Un nouvel Eurybiini du genre Alesa de Guyane française (Lepidoptera, Riodinidae) par Christian BRÉVIGNON Villa A7, Rochambeau, F – 97351 Matoury <[email protected]> Résumé. – Une nouvelle espèce du genre Alesa Doubleday, 1847, originaire de Guyane française, Alesa humilis n. sp., est décrite et comparée avec deux espèces proches, A. telephae (Boisduval, 1836) et A. amethystina Gallard & Fernandez, 2015. Abstract. – A new Eurybiini of the genus Alesa from French Guiana (Lepidoptera, Riodinidae). A new species of the genus Alesa Doubleday, 1847, from French Guiana, Alesa humilis n. sp., is described and compared with two closely allied species, A. telephae (Boisduval, 1836) and A. amethystina Gallard & Fernandez, 2015. Keywords. – Riodininae, new species, taxonomy, Guiana shield. _________________ Le genre Alesa Doubleday, 1847, a récemment fourni matière à description de nouveaux taxa (SALAZAR & CONSTANTINO, 2007 ; HALL & AHRENHOLZ, 2010 ; GALLARD & FERNANDEZ, 2015). Un spécimen mâle de la collection L. & C. Brévignon avait été mis de côté depuis de nombreuses années en vue d’un examen plus approfondi. Les motifs alaires et la structure des genitalia permettent de différencier ce spécimen des taxa décrits jusqu’alors, et particulièrement d’Alesa telephae (Boisduval, 1836) et d’A. amethystina Gallard & Fernandez, 2015. L’objet de cet article est la description de cette nouvelle espèce. Alesa humilis n. sp. (fig. 1-2) HOLOTYPE : ♂, Guyane française, Roura, RN 2, PK 35, 14.X.1989, collection L. & C. Brévignon (Matoury, Guyane française). Description du mâle. – Longueur de l’aile antérieure : 19,5 mm. Antennes brun clair, trompe beige, vertex brun, pattes antérieures beiges, abdomen court, légèrement teinté d’orangé face dorsale.
    [Show full text]
  • This File Was Created by Scanning the Printed
    J Insect Behav DOl 10.1007/sI0905-011-9289-1 Evidence for Mate Guarding Behavior in the Taylor's Checkerspot Butterfly Victoria J. Bennett· Winston P. Smith· Matthew G. Betts Revised: 29 July 20 II/Accepted: 9 August 20II ��. Springer Seicnee+Business Media, LLC 2011 Abstract Discerning the intricacies of mating systems in butterflies can be difficult, particularly when multiple mating strategies are employed and are cryptic and not exclusive. We observed the behavior and habitat use of 113 male Taylor's checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas editha taylori). We confinned that two distinct mating strategies were exhibited; patrolling and perching. These strategies varied temporally in relation to the protandrous mating system employed. Among perching males, we recorded high site fidelity and aggressive defense of small «5 m2) territories. This telTitoriality was not clearly a function of classic or non-classic resource defense (i.e., host plants or landscape), but rather appeared to constitute guarding of female pupae (virgin females). This discrete behavior is previously undocumented for this species and has rarely been observed in butterflies. Keywords Euphydryas editha taylori . mating systems · pre-copulatory mate guarding· protandry· sexual selection Introduction Inn'asexual selection is the most conunonly observed and well-documented sexual selection process exhibited by butterfly species (Andersson 1994; Rutowski 1997; Wiklund 2003). Competition between males for sexually receptive females has led to the evolution of a large variety of mating systems in this taxon (Rutowski 1991). Among these mating systems, mate acquisition strategies, such as mate locating, V J. Bennett (18) . M. G. Betts Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Biological Assessment Boletín RAP Evaluación Biológica
    Rapid Assessment Program Programa de Evaluación Rápida Evaluación Biológica Rápida de Chawi Grande, Comunidad Huaylipaya, Zongo, La Paz, Bolivia RAP Bulletin A Rapid Biological Assessment of of Biological Chawi Grande, Comunidad Huaylipaya, Assessment Zongo, La Paz, Bolivia Boletín RAP de Evaluación Editores/Editors Biológica Claudia F. Cortez F., Trond H. Larsen, Eduardo Forno y Juan Carlos Ledezma 70 Conservación Internacional Museo Nacional de Historia Natural Gobierno Autónomo Municipal de La Paz Rapid Assessment Program Programa de Evaluación Rápida Evaluación Biológica Rápida de Chawi Grande, Comunidad Huaylipaya, Zongo, La Paz, Bolivia RAP Bulletin A Rapid Biological Assessment of of Biological Chawi Grande, Comunidad Huaylipaya, Assessment Zongo, La Paz, Bolivia Boletín RAP de Evaluación Editores/Editors Biológica Claudia F. Cortez F., Trond H. Larsen, Eduardo Forno y Juan Carlos Ledezma 70 Conservación Internacional Museo Nacional de Historia Natural Gobierno Autónomo Municipal de La Paz The RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment is published by: Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500 Arlington, VA USA 22202 Tel: +1 703-341-2400 www.conservation.org Cover Photos: Trond H. Larsen (Chironius scurrulus). Editors: Claudia F. Cortez F., Trond H. Larsen, Eduardo Forno y Juan Carlos Ledezma Design: Jaime Fernando Mercado Murillo Map: Juan Carlos Ledezma y Veronica Castillo ISBN 978-1-948495-00-4 ©2018 Conservation International All rights reserved. Conservation International is a private, non-proft organization exempt from federal income tax under section 501c(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Conservation International or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Genera Tiniocellus Péringuey, 1901 and Nitiocellus Gen
    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 47 (2010) : 71‒126. REVISION OF THE GENERA TINIOCELLUS PÉRINGUEY, 1901 AND NITIOCELLUS GEN. N. (COLEOPTERA, SCARABAEIDAE, ONITICELLINI) Tristão Branco Rua de Camões, 788, 2º Dto, P-4000-142 Porto, Portugal − [email protected] Abstract: The taxonomical history of the genus Tiniocellus Péringuey, 1901 and the 10 species-group names that have been associated with it is reviewed, and the reasons that justify the creation of Nitiocellus gen. n. for Oniticellus panthera Boucomont, 1921 and Oniticellus collarti Janssens, 1939, are explained. The taxonomy of the Oniticellini is briefly reviewed and a key is provided for the separation of Tiniocellus and Nitiocellus gen. n. from all the other genera currently ranged in the tribe. The synonymies of Oniticellus variegatus Fåhraeus, 1857 and Oniticellus humilis Gerstaecker, 1871 with Tiniocellus spinipes (Roth, 1851) are confirmed. The Asian Tiniocellus imbellis (Bates, 1891) and the African Tiniocellus setifer (Kraatz, 1895) are rehabilitated as good species. Oniticellus modestus Arrow, 1908 is synonymised with T. imbellis, and Tiniocellus asmarensis Balthasar, 1968 with T. spinipes. Three Afrotropical species, one of them containing two subspecies, are described: T. praetermissus sp. n. from western Africa, T. dolosus sp. n. from eastern, central and western Africa, T. eurypygus sp. n. from South Africa, the nominotypical subspecies from the uplands west of the Drakensberg mountain range, and T. eurypygus transdrakensbergensis ssp. n. from the lowlands east of the same mountain range. Keys are provided to the species and sub- species of Tiniocellus, and to the species of Nitiocellus gen. n. For this study 4,628 specimens were examined, including the name-bearing types of all the species-group names, except that of T.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit Amet, Consectetur Adipiscing Elit
    Volume 26: 102–108 METAMORPHOSIS www.metamorphosis.org.za ISSN 1018–6490 (PRINT) LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA ISSN 2307–5031 (ONLINE) Classification of the Afrotropical butterflies to generic level Published online: 25 December 2015 Mark C. Williams 183 van der Merwe Street, Rietondale, Pretoria, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © Lepidopterists’ Society of Africa Abstract: This paper applies the findings of phylogenetic studies on butterflies (Papilionoidea) in order to present an up to date classification of the Afrotropical butterflies to genus level. The classification for Afrotropical butterflies is placed within a worldwide context to subtribal level. Taxa that still require interrogation are highlighted. Hopefully this classification will provide a stable context for researchers working on Afrotropical butterflies. Key words: Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, Afrotropical butterflies, classification. Citation: Williams, M.C. (2015). Classification of the Afrotropical butterflies to generic level. Metamorphosis 26: 102–108. INTRODUCTION Suborder Glossata Fabricius, 1775 (6 infraorders) Infraorder Heteroneura Tillyard, 1918 (34 Natural classifications of biological organisms, based superfamilies) on robust phylogenetic hypotheses, are needed before Clade Obtectomera Minet, 1986 (12 superfamilies) meaningful studies can be conducted in regard to their Superfamily Papilionoidea Latreille, 1802 (7 evolution, biogeography, ecology and conservation. families) Classifications, dating from the time of Linnaeus in the Family Papilionidae Latreille, 1802 (32 genera, 570 mid seventeen hundreds, were based on morphology species) for nearly two hundred and fifty years. Classifications Family Hedylidae Guenée, 1858 (1 genus, 36 species) based on phylogenies derived from an interrogation of Family Hesperiidae Latreille, 1809 (570 genera, 4113 the genome of individual organisms began in the late species) 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies from the Middle Eocene: the Earliest Occurrence of Fossil Papilionoidea (Lepidoptera)
    THE PEARCE- SELLARDS Sctks NUMBER 29 BUTTERFLIES FROM THE MIDDLE EOCENE: THE EARLIEST OCCURRENCE OF FOSSIL PAPILIONOIDEA (LEPIDOPTERA) Christopher J. Durden and Hugh Rose 1978 Texas Memorial Museum/2400 Trinity/Austin, Texas 78705 W. W. Newcomb, Director The Pearce-Sellards Series is an occasional, miscellaneous series of brief reports of museum and museum associated field investigations and other research. Its title seeks to commemorate the first two directors of the Texas Memorial Museum, now both deceased: J. E. Pearce and Dr. E. H. Sellards, professors of anthropology and geology respectively, of The University of Texas. A complete list of Pearce-Sellards papers, as well as other publica- tions of the museum, will be sent upon request. BUTTERFLIES FROM THE MIDDLE EOCENE: THE EARLIEST OCCURRENCE OF FOSSIL PAPILIONOIDEA (LEPIDOPTERA) 1 Christopher J. Durden 2 and Hugh Rose 3 ABSTRACT Three fossil butterflies recently collected from the Green River Shale of Colorado extend the known range of Rhopalocera eight to ten million years back, to 48 Ma. Praepapilio Colorado n. g., n. sp., and P. gracilis n. sp. are primitive Papilionidae related to the modern Baronia brevicornis Salvin, but they require a new subfamily, Praepapilioninae. Riodinella nympha n. g., n. sp. is a primitive member of the Lycaenidae, related to modern Ancyluris, Riodina, and Rhetus, in the tribe Riodinidi. INTRODUCTION With approximately 194,000 living species, the Lepidoptera is, after the Coleoptera with some 350,000, species, the second most diverse order of organisms. It is underrepresented in the fossil record (Scudder 1875, 1891, 1892; Handlirsch 1925;Mackay 1970;Kuhne 1973; Shields 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Devries, P.J., B.C. Cabral, C.M. Penz. 2004
    N. 102 May 31, 2004 ~ C/) in Biology and Geology :J ~ C/) Z :J ~ 0 ~ The early stages of Apodemia paucipuncta U (Riodinidae): myrmecophily, ~ •.......• a new caterpillar ant-organ ........l and consequences for classification ~ :J By Pi. De Vries :J ~ Center for Biodiversity Studies Milwaukee Public Museum ~ ~ ~ 800 West Wells Street Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA ~ Berites c. Cabral ~ Departamento de Zoologia ~ Universidade de Brasilia P.O. Box 04525 ~ ~ Brasilia, Distrito Federal 70919-970, Brazil :J Carla M. Pen: -< Department of Invertebrate Zoology Z Milwaukee Public Museum 800 West Wells Street, ~ Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA ........l 0 •.......• Milwaukee Public ~ U MUSEUM Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology Paul Mayer, Editor Reviewer for this Publication: Andre Victor Lucci Freitas, Museu de Historia Natural, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas This publication is priced at $6.00 and may be obtained by writing to the Museum Shop, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Orders must include $3.00 for shipping and handling ($4.00 for foreign destinations) and must be accompanied by money order or check drawn on U.S. bank. Money orders or checks should be made payable to the Milwaukee Public Museum, Inc. Wisconsin residents please add 5% sales tax. ISBN 0-89326-215-3 ©2004 Milwaukee Public Museum, Inc. Abstract The early stages of Apodemia paucipuncta are described for the first time. This species forms symbiotic associations with Crematogaster ants in central Brazil, and possesses four sets of ant-organs: tentacle nectary organs, vibratory papillae, balloon setae and for the first time in the Riodinidae, a cervical gland that is used in myrmecophily.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2002 Band/Volume: 25 Autor(en)/Author(s): Garcia-Barros Enrique Artikel/Article: Taxonomic patterns in the egg to body size allometry of butterflies and skippers (Papilionoidea & Hesperiidae) 161-175 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 25 (2/3): 161-175 161 Taxonomic patterns in the egg to body size allometry of butter- flies and skippers (Papilionoidea & Hesperiidae) Enrique Garcia-Barros Departmento de Biologia (Zool.), Universidad Autönoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain e-mail: [email protected] Summary. Former studies have shown that there is an interspecific allometric relationship between egg size and adult body size in butterflies and skippers. This is here re-assessed at the family and subfamily levels in order to determine to what extent the overall trend is uniform through different taxonomic lineages. The results suggest that different subtaxa are characterised by different allometric slopes. Al- though statistical analysis across species means is known to be potentially misleading to assess evolu- tionary relations, it is shown that the comparison of apparent patterns (based on species means) with inferred evolutionary trends (based on independent contrasts) may help to understand the evolution of egg size in butterflies. Further, intuitive reconsideration of statistically non-significant results may prove informative. As an example, argumentation in favour of a positive association between large egg size and the use of monocotyledon plants as larval food is presented. Taxa where atypical allometric trends are found include the Riodininae and Theclini (Lycaenidae), the Graphiini (Papilionidae), and the Heliconiinae (Nymphalidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Type Specimens of Lepidoptera Rhopalocera in the Hill Museum
    Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries CATALOGUE OF THE Type Specimens of Lepidoptera Rhopalocera IN THE HILL MUSEUM BY A. G. GABRIEL, F.E.S. Issued June, 1932 LONDON JOHN BALE, SONS & DANIELSSON, LTD. 83-91, GBEAT TITCHFIELD STEEET, OXEOED STEEET, W. 1 1932 Price 20/- Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries Unfortunately Mr. Joicey did not live to see the publication of this Catalogue. It will however remain, together with the four completed volumes of the " Bulletin of the Hill Museum," as a lasting memorial to to the magnificent collection of Lepidoptera amassed by Mr. Joicey, and to the work carried out at the Hill Museum under his auspices. G. Talbot. Original from and digitized by National University of Singapore Libraries CATALOGUE OF THE TYPE SPECIMENS OF LEPIDOPTERA RHOPALOCERA IN THE HILL MUSEUM. By A. G. GABRIEL, F.E.S. INTRODUCTION BY G. TALBOT. It is important to know exactly where type specimens are to be found. The British Museum set an example by publishing catalogues of some of their Rhopalocera types, and we hope this will be continued. Mr. Gabriel, who was responsible for that work, has been asked by Mr. Joicey to prepare a catalogue for the Hill Museum. The original description of almost every name in this catalogue has been examined for the correct reference, and where the sex or habitat was wrongly quoted, the necessary correction has been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad Y Taxonomía De Mariposas Diurnas Del Macizo Acahay, Paraguarí, Paraguay
    FICHA DE INSCRIPCIÓN 1) Nombre COMPLETO del autor1: Selma Suzanne Araceli Van Ruymbeke Ramos 2) Número de DNI: 3815882 3) Fecha de Nacimiento: 14/07/93 4) Pasaporte: N428119 5) Teléfono: 021-584396 6) Celular: +595 981 890519 7) Correo electrónico: 8) Estudiante de grado ….. Estudiante de posgrado….. Graduado…X. 9) Carrera: Lic. En Ciencias Mención Biología 10) Unidad académica de pertenencia: Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales 11) Tiene necesidades especiales? No 12) Nombre del director del proyecto: Christian Vogt 13) Correo electrónico del director: [email protected] 14) Teléfono del director: +595 985 783730 15) Otros autores del trabajo: Ezequiel Núñez Bustos 16) Título del trabajo: Diversidad y Taxonomía de mariposas diurnas del Macizo Acahay, Paraguarí, Paraguay 1 En caso de que el trabajo sea seleccionado, SOLAMENTE el autor consignado en este campo participará de las XXVI JJI de AUGM en la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina. 17) Línea de investigación de AUGM a la que pertenece (marque con una cruz) A. Humanidades 1. A cien años de la Reforma Universitaria: saber te hace libre 2. Evaluación Institucional, Planeamiento Estratégico y Gestión Universitaria 3. Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 4. Desarrollo Regional 5. Educación para la Integración 6. Enseñanza de Español y Portugués como Lengua Segunda o Extranjera 7. Extensión Universitaria 8. Género 9. Historia, Regiones, y Fronteras 10. Literatura, Imaginarios, Estética, y Cultura 11. Medios y Comunicación Universitaria 12. Procesos Cooperativos y Asociativos 13. Producción Artística y Cultural 14. Accesibilidad y Discapacidad B. Ciencias Exactas 15. Biofísica 16. Ciencias e Ingeniería de Materiales 17. Ciencia, Tecnología, e innovación 18.
    [Show full text]