DOCSLIB.ORG

National Consultation with Young People on the Initiative for RECOM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Consultation with Young People on the Initiative for RECOM National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina October 17th 2009 The second national consultation with young people in Bosnia and Herzegovina was organized by the Youth Initiative for Human Rights in BiH. The gathering was attended by more than 50 participants representing various youth organizations from Banja Luka, Sanski Most, Prijedor, Rudo, Srebrenica, Bihać, Bijeljina, and Šeković. The consultations were monitored by Mario Mažić (Youth Initiative for Human Rights, Croatia) and Marijana Toma (Impunity Watch) and the discussion was moderated by Alma Mašić (Youth Initiative for Human Rights, Sarajevo, BiH) and Aleksandra Letić (Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Republika Srpska, national coordinator of the consultations process of the Coalition for RECOM in BiH). Suggestions, opinions, and recommendations of the participants. The main task of the Coalition for RECOM should be to watch out for any damaging political effects inflicted upon the Commission. The Coalition for RECOM has a uniquely important role to monitor the work of the Commission and make sure that it is independent from its founders, i.e. the governments of participating states because we must not allow the Commission to depend on daily political interests, conflicts, and so on. The Commission must be independent in a way similar to that of the judiciary. So, members of the Commission and researchers employed by the Commission must not be under any political influence whatsoever (...) and must be able to carry on their investigations openly and transparently. (Mario Mažić, Youth Initiative for Human Rights, Croatia, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) There is a dilemma whether being financially dependent on the founding states will impair the ability of the Commission to function independently. I am afraid of the way this truth-commission is going to be funded (...). I am afraid that the states will agree to fund the commission but that in the end they will not give any money. (Ervin Blažević, Mladost Youth Association, Kozarac, BiH, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) I think that the commission should be funded by international donors. However, I don’t think that the public financing option would represent an additional threat to the independent work of the commission. (Mario Mažić, Youth Initiative for Human Rights, Croatia, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) There is a reasonable amount of concern that the parliaments will try to obstruct the work of RECOM because some parliament members are the same people who committed war crimes. My only concern is the possible obstruction of the work of the commission. I think it is not going to be a problem to establish the commission, but to ensure it completes its work. The way I see it is that parliaments may make a decision to form the commission, but if people who committed war crimes are members of these parliaments, they will do anything in their power to prevent the establishment of the facts pertaining to these crimes. (Dejan Čabrilo, Youth Group of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Republika Srpska, Bijeljina, BiH, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) The generation that fought this war does not recognize other nation’s victims. RECOM can only receive support from post-war generations. The target group you should be focusing on are young people. The generations that participated in the war (...) are really blinded (...); they have their pain and their victims. They cannot worry about victims from other ethnic groups. They just want to find their peace but within their own national environment. They will even go as far as to protect the identity of those who caused the death of others or genocide on other sides. You should strongly focus on the consciousness of the young people (...) because a young person can equally understand other nations’ victims as their own (...) simply because they value every human life the same. (Rade Mrđen, Party of the Democratic Progress, Young People Council, Banja Luka, BiH, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) When the RECOM creation process is over there won’t be any more manipulations with victims or with the names of victims. It is important that we now have this initiative and we can’t go back. And why is it important? Simply because it will curtail all forms of manipulations with victims and their destinies, with numbers of victims and war heroes. We will be able to leave it all behind us and move on. (Dalibor Tanić, Youth Initiative for Human Rights in BiH, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009). RECOM is a positive solution with respect to the need to find out the truth and achieve reconciliation. In my opinion (...) that coalition of non-governmental organizations, RECOM, is a positive solution with respect to discovering the truth and achieving reconciliation and also to offering psychological support to victims. RECOM is a mechanism, a good mechanism for getting out of this situation. (Lamija Gudić, Youth Center, Gornji Vakuf-Uskoplje, BiH, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) I think that we can’t have a future until we discuss our past, until we deal with our past. The situation in Gornji Vakuf is that the town is very strictly divided and it cannot be unified unless we deal with our past. It is a very important feature and I strongly support this initiative and I hope it will be successful. (Nejra Jukić, Youth Center Gornji Vakuf, BiH, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) RECOM gives space to victims to talk about their suffering, to unburden themselves and make a step forward towards a shared life. It is a good idea to give victims an opportunity to talk about what they have suffered, that is the focal point of this initiative. This commission has a huge importance for the future of the entire region because I feel that it also has a therapeutic character. Victims (...) who are offered an opportunity to talk will be able to get rid of the burden that they carry and they will be ready to take a step in the direction of a shared life. (Almir Salihović, Association of students from Srebrenica, Srebrenica, BiH, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) The key issue is that the facts about the war crimes committed against the Bosniaks in Prijedor are accepted by the Serbs and that the facts about the crimes committed against the Serbs in Konjic are accepted by the Bosniaks. The Coalition for RECOM will get the support of victims associations in BiH. Bosniaks from Prijedor will support RECOM, while the Serbs may not be so willing to do that (...). I’d like to hear both sides admit that the crimes have been committed against the other side (...). I’d like to hear them say ‘yes, they are different from me but they are still my fellow citizens’. They may both be against RECOM, I don’t know. That is the whole point of this story. (Ervin Blažević, Mladost Youth Association, Kozarac, BiH, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) The priority is to enable victims from Knin testify in Croatia and bring the victims from Vukovar to testify in Serbia. Let’s say that the testimonies of the victims from Knin should be heard in Belgrade, in Banja Luka, and in Zagreb, depending on the year (...) that the testimonies of the victims from Stolac and Prozor are heard in Zagreb, that the testimonies of the victims from Vukovar are heard in Belgrade, Niš, etc. There are priorities, of course (...). It is not so important that the people in Zagreb listen about the Kosovo Albanians or the Serbs from Kosovo who were victimized, but it is important that we hear about the year 1995. It is important that we hear about the victims that not only the Croatian Defence Council (HVO) but the Croatian Army (HV) too, produced in Bosnia and Herzegovina. That is the key – the voice of the victims, the platform for victims’ testimonies should have a regional character. (Mario Mažić, Youth Initiative for Human Rights, Croatia, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) How will RECOM treat those who lost their lives or became victims in other ways while waiting for the humanitarian aid or those who were killed in mine fields? How will RECOM treat those who lost their lives or became victims in other ways while waiting for the humanitarian aid or those who were killed in minefields? Are they going to be treated as victims? (Ismar Kasapović, Youth Initiative for Human Rights in BiH, National consultation with young people on the Initiative for RECOM, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 17th 2009.) Witnesses are disappearing and the truth is disappearing with them. Many witnesses are abroad and they need to be included in the process. Witnesses who could tell the truth are slowly disappearing and the truth is going away with them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Safet Zajko” Započeli Radovi Na Uređenju
    Broj: 9 juli-avgust 2014. godine Informativni časopis Općine Novi Grad Sarajevo Interviju sa Mirsadom Purivatrom Općina dobila na korištenje kasarnu “Safet Zajko” Započeli radovi na uređenju Počela rekonstrukcija POSAO ZA 15 PRIPRAVNIKA POSJETA DELEGACIJE KROVOVA I FASADA ISTANBULSKE oPĆine beYOGLU stambenih zgrada VAŽNIJI TELEFONI I E-MAIL ADRESE SADRŽAJ: Služba za poslove Općinskog vijeća 033 291-130, fax. 033 291-271 [email protected] Intervju 4 Općinsko pravobranilaštvo 033 291-162 [email protected] Općinsko vijeće 7 Stručna služba za poslove kabineta općinskog načelnika i zajedničke poslove 033 291-100 033 291-103; fax. 033 291-278 Kabinet načelnika 12 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Privreda 21 Općinska služba za obrazovanje, kulturu, sport i lokalni integrisani razvoj 033 291 117 Infrastruktura 27 033 291 281; fax. 291 170 [email protected] Općinska služba za boračka pitanja, rad, Sarajevo kroz historiju 44 socijalna pitanja i zdravstvo 291-237; fax.291-164 [email protected] Obrazovanje 50 033 291-173; fax. 291-173 [email protected] 291-306; fax.291-281 Kultura 56 Općinska služba za privredu, finansije i inspekcijske poslove 033 291-122 [email protected] Sport 58 [email protected] [email protected] 291-234; fax.291-319 Obilježavanja 62 [email protected] Općinska služba za urbanizam, imovin- sko-pravne poslove i katastar nekretnina Ostale vijesti 80 033 291-120; fax.
    [Show full text]
  • Srebrenica - Intro ENG.Qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 1
    srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 1 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA CONFERENCE SERIES SREBRENICA 21 MAY 2005 srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 2 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA The Bridging the Gap conference in Srebrenica would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of many people and agencies. Our thanks to all those that made this remarkable series possible. Appreciation is expressed to the Helsinki Committee in Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Their commitment to truth-seeking and upholding basic human values, often in the face of hostility, is acknowledged. The event was generously supported by the Neighbourhood Programme of the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Heartfelt appreciation is extended to those people most affected by the crimes addressed at the conference. Without their bravery, nothing could be accomplished. ii Bridging the Gap between the ICTY and communities in Bosnia and Herzegovina CONFERENCE SERIES SREBRENICA 21 MAY 2005 A publication of the Communications Service, Registry, ICTY Contents Editor: Liam McDowall Graphics Editor: Leslie Hondebrink-Hermer Contributors: Ernesa Begi}-Ademagi}, Rebecca Cuthill, Matias Hellman, James Landale, Natalie O’Brien Printed by Albani drukkers, The Hague, Netherlands 2009 SREBRENICA srebrenica - intro ENG.qxp 21/07/2009 2:59 PM Page 3 BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE ICTY AND COMMUNITIES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Table of contents Map
    [Show full text]
  • Worlds Apart: Bosnian Lessons for Global Security
    Worlds Apart Swanee Hunt Worlds Apart Bosnian Lessons for GLoBaL security Duke university Press Durham anD LonDon 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Charis by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. To my partners c harLes ansBacher: “Of course you can.” and VaLerie GiLLen: “Of course we can.” and Mirsad JaceVic: “Of course you must.” Contents Author’s Note xi Map of Yugoslavia xii Prologue xiii Acknowledgments xix Context xxi Part i: War Section 1: Officialdom 3 1. insiDe: “Esteemed Mr. Carrington” 3 2. outsiDe: A Convenient Euphemism 4 3. insiDe: Angels and Animals 8 4. outsiDe: Carter and Conscience 10 5. insiDe: “If I Left, Everyone Would Flee” 12 6. outsiDe: None of Our Business 15 7. insiDe: Silajdžić 17 8. outsiDe: Unintended Consequences 18 9. insiDe: The Bread Factory 19 10. outsiDe: Elegant Tables 21 Section 2: Victims or Agents? 24 11. insiDe: The Unspeakable 24 12. outsiDe: The Politics of Rape 26 13. insiDe: An Unlikely Soldier 28 14. outsiDe: Happy Fourth of July 30 15. insiDe: Women on the Side 33 16. outsiDe: Contact Sport 35 Section 3: Deadly Stereotypes 37 17. insiDe: An Artificial War 37 18. outsiDe: Clashes 38 19. insiDe: Crossing the Fault Line 39 20. outsiDe: “The Truth about Goražde” 41 21. insiDe: Loyal 43 22. outsiDe: Pentagon Sympathies 46 23. insiDe: Family Friends 48 24. outsiDe: Extremists 50 Section 4: Fissures and Connections 55 25.
    [Show full text]
  • International Decision-Making in the Age of Genocide: Srebrenica 1993-1995
    International Decision-Making in the Age of Genocide: Srebrenica 1993-1995 Rapporteur Report The Hague June 29-July 1, 2015 International Decision-Making in the Age of Genocide: Srebrenica 1993-1995 Conference in The Hague, June 29 – July 1, 2015 Executive Summary Leading decision-makers from more than a dozen countries gathered in The Hague from June 29 to July 1, 2015, to consider the failure of the international community to protect the United Nations “safe area” of Srebrenica, resulting in the largest massacre in Europe since World War II. Participants included three former members of the UN Security Council, senior government and UN officials, peacekeepers, and eyewitnesses to the Srebrenica tragedy. Over the course of four working sessions, a public event, and numerous informal meetings, conference participants focused on a disastrous two-year chain of events that culminated in the fall of Srebrenica in July 1995. They examined the origins of the “safe area” policy, beginning with the March 1993 visit to Srebrenica by French General Philippe Morillon, and disagreements on how to implement frequently impractical Security Council resolutions. The discussion revealed sharp disconnects between the policy-makers in New York, the peacekeepers on the ground, and the people the “safe areas” were ostensibly designed to keep safe. “I saw this conference as a kind of truth commission,” said Srebrenica survivor Muhamed Duraković. “Twenty years on, we cannot bring back the dead, but we can learn from what went wrong in Srebrenica. If we are not able to go through the process of fact-finding, truth, and reconciliation, we may be creating problems for future generations.” At the heart of the international failure in Srebrenica in July 1995 was the inability of the major powers to devise and implement an agreed strategy for ending the defining conflict of the immediate post-Cold War era.
    [Show full text]
  • S E R B I a Knin ˆ Bor
    CENTRAL BALKAN REGION 16 18 20 22 Nagykanizsa Tisza Hódmezövásárhely Dravaˆ Kaposvár Szekszárd SLOVENIA P Celje Varazdin A Szeged N H U N G A R Y N Arad O N Pécs 46 I 46 A Danube Subotica Mures N Bjelovar B A Zagreb S Kikinda Deva I Tisa N Sombor Timisoara¸ Hunedoara T N A Karlovac B A R O M A N I A Sisak C R O A T I A Osijek Vojvodina Petroseni Sava Vukovar Zrenjanin S Resita¸ ¸ LP Novi Sad A ˆ N IA Slavonski Brod Federation of Bosnia Vrsac N and Herzegovina Danube A Tirgu-Jiu V Prijedor Ruma L ˆ ˆ ˆ Y S Bihac Republika Srpska Brcko Pancevo N A D Banja Luka Doboj Sava R Drobeta-Turnu Bijeljina Sabac Belgrade Danube T Severin Udbina I Smederevo Kljuc Tuzla N B O S N I A A A N D Valjevo Danube Zenica Drina R S e r b i a Knin ˆ Bor 44 H E R Z E G O V I N A Srebrenica Kragujevac 44 Glamoc I ˆ Vidin Calafat C Sarajevo Uzice Paracin´ Šibenik Pale Kraljevo Federation of Bosnia ˆ Morava D and Herzegovina Gorazde Split A ˆ L A M Foca Montana A T L Nis´ B I Republika A Mostar L A Priboj K P Srpska A ˆ Ta ra Novi Pazar N M Ploce S Bijelo TS. Piva Polje Neum Kosovska Mitrovica Berane Montenegro BULG. Nikšic´ Pec´ Priština Dubrovnik Kosovo Vranje Pernik CROATIA Podgorica Dakovica Gnjilane NORTH (Djakovica) Uroševac Kotor ALBANIAN Kyustendil ALPS Prizren A Lake I N Kumanovo Scutari N Kukës A 42 Shkodër L Tetovo Skopje 42 Bar P R A S Gostivar Štip Shëngjin Titov Veles A d r i a t i c Peshkopi THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Vardar Strumica Barletta S e a Tirana Prilep Lake Durrës Ohrid I T A L Y Bari Elbasan Ohrid Bitola Republic boundary
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitate Access to Education for Children from Rural Areas of Srebrenica
    FACILITATE ACCESS TO EDUCATION FOR CHILDREN FROM RURAL AREAS OF SREBRENICA Applicant: Authorized / responsible person: "HUMANITARIAN ORGANIZATION INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF HAMZALIJA OKANOVIĆ, SOLIDARITY - EMMAUS" DIRECTOR IFS-EMMAUS Duje bb. 74 207 Doboj Istok, BiH Tel: +387 35 726 690 Tel: +387 35 726 690 Fax: +387 35 720 284 Fax: +387 35 720 284 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 1. SUMMARY Since 2006, International forum of solidarity-Emmaus has been working on the construction of the educational centre for children in Potočari, Srebrenica. Year after year, during youth working camps held each year in July one new house has been built. Over a period of several years and many donations IFS-EMMAUS managed to finish the construction of the educational centre. The main goal for construction of this centre was to facilitate process of education for children living in rural areas of Srebrenica who are impeded to come to school during winter due to bad, bumpy, damaged streets and inadequate, irregular means of transportation. One more reason is that often those children come from poor families who have five to six children where elder children have to look after the smaller so that the parents can work in agriculture and provide at least food on the table. Therefore, the greatest challenge that IFS-EMMAUS faced at the beginning are the parents and their disbelief about the idea that the Centre would provide all what they lack and most importantly free of charge. During years with a lot of work, many workshops for parents we manage to increase the number of children accommodated in the Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Cleansing, Genocide and Demographic Changes in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies Year 2, Issue 2, June 2019, pp. 57-81. Ethnic Cleansing, Genocide and Demographic Changes in Bosnia and Herzegovina Muhidin Mulalic Abstract: Different cultures, religions and traditions and hence multiculturalism represented in demographic diversity was strongly engraved in Bosnian cities, towns and villages. Different groups of people in Bosnia and Herzegovina shared diverse demographic space that ensured continuation of peace, equal opportunities, mutual tolerance, civil rights and multiethnic coexistence. This paper aims to articulate historical developments of Bosnian demographic diversity by especially taking into consideration the multicultural model and the developments during the 1990s. Then, it is significant to analyze the ethnic cleansing and genocide and how they have changed the demographic structure of the country, especially with regards to the existence of multiethnic cities, towns and villages. This paper explores ethnic cleansing and genocide as tools within the context of demographic changes, especially in the Serb controlled territories. How the ethnic cleansing and genocide were organized and carried out? What are the root-causes of ethnic cleansing and genocide that were deeply rooted in radical nationalist ideologies and projects? Why radical ethno-cultural national ideology was systematically used for cleansing the territories from the “other” “alien” ethnicities, nations and people? In-depth analysis of the demographic changes as a result of ethnic cleansing and genocide will be based on Bosnian population censuses of 1991 and of 2013. A comparative analysis will clearly demonstrate to what extent ethnic cleansing and genocide affected centuries old demographic diversity of Bosnian cities, towns and villages. Keywords: Demography; Ethnic Cleansing; Genocide; Multiculturalism; Migrations Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Record: Refugee Returns to Srebrenica Issue 14. the Ngos
    On the Record: Refugee Returns to Srebrenica Issue 14. The NGOs of Srebrenica Part 1, 2003 The author of this report, Peter Lippman, was born in Seattle, Washington (USA) and is a long-time human rights activist. He holds a degree in international studies and is fluent in Bosnian-Croatian- Serbian. Peter's dispatches from Bosnia were first published in AP's online newsletter On The Record. The photo shows Novak Simic, president of the Srebrenica Forum of NGOs, standing outside the Forum’s rehabilitated office in Srebrenica in 2003. Contact Peter at [email protected]. Contents The Forum of Srebrenica NGOs Forum Goals: New Facilities, Better Communication Nowhere to Play: Srebrenica’s Children a Priority for NGOs How NGOs are Filling the Gap Reconstruction and the Responsibility of Civil Society New Members The Forum of Srebrenica NGOs Srebrenica has always presented a formidable challenge for NGO activists -- and they have risen to the challenge. NGOs refused to allow the rest of the world to forget Srebrenica between 1996 and 2000. They will play a critical role in the reconstruction of Srebrenica in the coming period, by providing support for returnees and displaced, support for those who are evicted, and monitoring the process of reconstruction. An important factor in the work of Srebrenica's local organizations is the Forum of Srebrenica NGOs, founded in 2001 to coordinate the work of a growing network of grassroots groups. The Forum was established with encouragement and financial support from the Danish Refugee Council (DRC), which worked in Srebrenica from 2000 through 2002. The DRC called representatives from grassroots groups together, and they decided to create the Forum as an umbrella organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Ethnic Cleansing and the Plight of Refugees
    CHAPTER 1 ETHNIC CLEANSING AND THE PLIGHT OF REFUGEES The War in Outline 1.1 War broke out in the former Yugoslavia in 1991 as a result of rising nationalism exploited in the first instance by President Milosevic of Serbia and taken up with a vengeance by President Tudjman of Croatia. Tito had subdued nationalist and ethnic rivalries and fears by carefully crafted federal arrangements designed to balance the ethnic groups within Yugoslavia. 1.2 Beginning in Kosovo in 1987, Milosevic abandoned caution in the pursuit of political advantage and his actions led first to the dissolution of the federal political structure and then to secession first by Slovenia, then Croatia and then Bosnia. Slovenia and Croatia embraced independence eagerly; Bosnia was left no choice. 1.3 In response to the claims of the Croatian and Slovenian republics for independence, Serbia went to war. The war in Slovenia lasted only a matter of weeks and in Croatia approximately six months, between July and December 1991. Slovenia, homogeneous in its ethnic population, separated relatively unscathed; Croatia lost a third of its territory to rebel Croatian Serbs backed by the Yugoslav National Army (JNA), 10,000 people were killed, hundreds of villages were destroyed and 250,000 people were driven from their homes. 1.4 The European Community recognised Croatian independence on 15 January 19921 at the same time that Croatia accepted a peace plan brokered by Cyrus Vance, the UN Special Envoy. Four sectors, UN Protected Areas (UNPAs), were established inside Croatia, monitored by 14,000 UN troops. In May and August 1995 three of these four sectors were retaken by Croatian forces, causing almost the entire Serbian population of the region (over 200,000 people) to flee.
    [Show full text]
  • Divided Sarajevo: Space Management, Urban Landscape and Spatial Practices Across the Boundary Bassi, Elena
    www.ssoar.info Divided Sarajevo: space management, urban landscape and spatial practices across the boundary Bassi, Elena Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Bassi, E. (2015). Divided Sarajevo: space management, urban landscape and spatial practices across the boundary. Europa Regional, 22.2014(3-4), 101-113. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-461616 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • Barcelona and Sarajevo Remember the Srebrenica Genocide on Its 20Th Anniversary
    Press kit Barcelona and Sarajevo remember the Srebrenica genocide on its 20th anniversary More than 8,000 people were killed on July 11th 1995 by the troops of General Ratko Mladic’ in the Srebrenica region, nowadays Bosnia and Herzegovina. These events took place 20 years ago; they constitute the first legally established case of genocide in the European continent, and the largest massive killing in Europe after the Second World War. The current list of missing people includes 8,373 names, most of them of kids and men. The enclave of Srebrenica had been declared Safe Area in 1993 by the United Nations Organisation, and it had an important population of Muslim refugees coming from other regions of former Yugoslavia. A detachment of 400 Blue Berets from the Netherlands were there to protect them, but none acted accordingly when needed. Concurrent with the massacre, female refugees in this town were also the victims of many acts of violence, such as torture and rape. Beyond the atrocities committed there, Srebrenica is a symbol of the most obscure aspects of the wars that took place in the Balkan area from 1991 to 1999, after the disintegration of Yugoslavia: war crimes, systematic crimes against Humanity, abandonment of the civilian population, emergence of political organisation and practice of fascist inspiration, cynicism of international powers, and ineffectiveness of Europe. Nowadays, twenty years later, the name of Srebrenica inspires also other positive, nobler values such as solidarity, mobilisation in favour of victim reparation, the spirit of reconstruction, the will to keep the memory of what should never have happened and should never happen again.
    [Show full text]
  • Srebrenica: 25 Years on Remembrance.Justice.Reconciliation
    SREBRENICA: 25 YEARS ON REMEMBRANCE.JUSTICE.RECONCILIATION. Our digital commemoration event “Srebrenica: 25 years on – Remembrance. Justice. Reconciliation.“ will be broadcasted on July 6, 2020 from 5pm to 6.30 pm CEST July 11, 2020 will mark the 25th anniversary of the Srebrenica genocide. In July 1995 Bosnian Serb troops captured the city, killing more than 8.000 Bosniak men and boys. To date, not all mass graves could be located. The world turned a blind eye to the perpetration of the worst crime against humanity on European soil since the end of the Second World War – a horrendous failure of European politics and the United Nations. More than 100.000 people lost their lives during the Bosnian War. Tens of thousands of girls and women were systematically raped and sexually assaulted. 25 years after the Dayton agreement, hatred and nationalism remain prevalent and a shared historical narrative is lacking. To date, a majority of Bosnians identify according to ethnicity. To date, war criminals are still worshipped as heroes. To date, many Bosnian politicians continue to follow their war time strategic goal: the creation of allegedly ethnically homogenous regions. 25 years after Srebrenica, we want to remember the victims and listen to voices who advocate justice and reconciliation. Voices of people who have the courage to address brutal war crimes instead of denying they happened, who have the courage to indict war criminals instead of glorifying them. People who have the courage to raise their voices and not let hostility keep them quiet, who courageously risked their own lives so they could save the lives of others.
    [Show full text]