Arxiv:Hep-Ph/9407308V3 22 Jul 1994 B Shimizu Y
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 Non-resonant diagrams in radiative four-fermion processes J. Fujimoto, T. Ishikawa, S. Kawabata, Y. Kurihara, Y. Shimizu a and D. Perret-Gallixb a Minami-Tateya Collaboration, KEK, Japan bLAPP-IN2P3/CNRS, France + − − The complete tree level cross section for e e e ν¯eudγ¯ is computed and discussed in comparison with + − − + − → the cross sections for e e e ν¯eud¯ and e e udu¯ d¯. Event generators based on the GRACE package for → → the non-radiative and radiative case are presented. Special interest is brought to the effect of the non-resonant diagrams overlooked so far in other studies. Their contribution to the total cross section is presented for the LEP II energy range and for future linear colliders (√s =500 GeV). Effects, at the W pair threshold, of order 3% − (e ν¯eud¯) and 27% (¯udud¯) are reported. Similar behaviour for the radiative case is shown. At √s = 500 GeV, the relative contribution of the non-resonant diagrams for the radiative channel reaches 42.5%. 1. Introduction far as the W mass reconstruction is concerned, these diagrams should be counted as background Two years ago, a complete calculation of processes, and they will contribute to the overall two four-fermion final states in e+e− collisions, + − − + − mass and width measurement uncertainties. e e e ν¯eud¯ and e e udu¯ d¯, was re- → → It has been recognized, since some time [3], ported at the Sotchi meeting [1]. It was shown that the radiative corrections in W pair produc- that the non-resonant diagrams play an impor- tion have to be included for a precise comparison tant role below the W pair threshold (up to 27% with measurements at the e+e− colliders. Initial at √s = 150 GeV) and exhibit a non-negligible state radiations (ISR) reduce the available center effect at higher energy (7% at √s = 190 GeV). of mass energy. Close to the W pair threshold, In these results, in addition to a set of exper- ISR will, therefore, enhance the relative contri- imental loose constraints, a cut on the θ angle bution of non-resonant diagrams. Final state ra- of the outgoing electron was applied to cope with diative corrections will contribute to additional gauge violations appearing in the subset of γ W − uncertainties on the mass reconstruction, unless diagrams. Below threshold, the non-resonant di- the photon is detected and properly accounted agrams competing only with the off-shellness of arXiv:hep-ph/9407308v3 22 Jul 1994 for in the mass reconstruction algorithm. How- the resonant ones, their relative contribution be- ever, photons coming from the intermediate W, comes quite large. The non-resonant diagrams which can be mistakingly recognized as final state are dominated by t-channel γ W graphs in sim- bremsstrahlung, will introduce additional uncer- ilarity with the well-known two-photon− (γ γ) − tainties. processes. Hence the cross section increases with Although a number of studies has been car- the energy and the contribution of non-resonant ried out in these last years, including [4][5], we processes keeps growing in contrast to that of res- present, for the first time, the complete tree level onant diagrams which falls with the energy. This computation of one of the radiative four-fermion effect was confirmed at this workshop by the anal- processes. This work can be used as a benchmark ysis of selected final states based on a dedicated for testing the validity of simplified and therefore four-fermion generator [2]. The non-resonant pro- faster generators. cesses are essentially single W or no W produc- tion. Some examples of these type of diagrams for the radiative case can be seen on Fig.1b,2. As 2 γ e γ u e u e W e d W d u u ν W γ e W νe d d γ W ν ν e ν e e e ν Z W e Z e e Z e γ e e e e e W (a) Figure 2. (Fig.1 cont.) Some examples of + − γ ν diagrams from the radiative process e e e e − ν ¯ → e e u e ν¯eudγ: Other non-resonant diagrams. d W W d W the denominator can vanishes for positive squared u u γ γ γ momentum transfer. A gauge invariance checking e e e e program is automatically built by the system. Only the kinematics for complex processes has to be written by the user. The issue, here, is to ν e νe e e figure out what is the best transform to apply to the basic integration variables to regularize the u u W W divergencies appearing in the integration of the d γ d γ d matrix element. The best kinematics will give e e the best accuracy for a given computation time. e e γ γ (b) 3. Four-fermion production The results presented hereafter have been ob- Figure 1. Some examples of diagrams from the + − − tained using the following set of parameters: radiative process e e e ν¯eudγ¯ : a) Resonant → diagrams, b)Non-resonant γ W diagrams. MZ = 91.1 GeV − ΓZ = 2.534 GeV 2. The GRACE system α = 1/137 2 2 2 sin θW = 1 (M /M ) The GRACE system [6] has been used to − W Z perform the very lengthy computations involved MW = 80 GeV in the study of most radiative processes. The mu = md = 0.1 GeV. GRACE package is a complete set of tools for computing tree level processes. All the phases The width of the W is taken from the Particle involved in a given computation are covered: Data Table; ΓW = 2.25 GeV. The gauge boson from the process definition (specification of the (W,Z) widths are assumed to be constant in the initial and final particles) to the event genera- calculation. Furthermore some realistic experi- tor. It is composed essentially of three compo- mental cuts have been introduced: nents: the diagram generator, the construction of ◦ θe > 8, 20, 30, 40 the matrix element based on helicity amplitude ◦ ◦ function from the CHANEL [7] library and the 172 > θγ, θq,q¯ > 8 multi-dimensional phase space integration pack- Eγ > 1 GeV, Ee,q,q¯ > 1 GeV age BASES [8] associated with the event genera- tor SPRING [8]. Fermion masses are properly introduced in the where θe,θγ and θq,q¯ are angles measured from − helicity amplitudes. The particle width is intro- the incident e beam and Ee,q,q¯ are the energies duced into the gauge boson propagators when of final e−, q andq ¯, respectively. The electron 3 polar angle cut is introduced to avoid an undesir- able gauge violation for extremely forward direc- tions [9] caused inevitably by the finite width of W boson when the subset of γ W diagrams is considered. − The gauge invariance of the amplitude is checked numerically for a random selection of the boson gauge parameters at several points in the phase space. The errors are within the preci- sion of numerical calculation (typically less than O(10−12) in double precision) when the W width is turned off. Further gauge cancellations are checked to confirm that the obtained cross sec- tions are stable against finite width. The pro- cedure is as follows: first extract the product of gauge boson propagators without width as an overall factor of the whole amplitude. Then re- place them by those with finite width. As a result, one is left with rigorously gauge invariant ampli- tude[10]. For the resonant diagrams, this method gives the same results as ordinally method. While for the γ W diagrams, this gives 10% smaller + − − ¯ − Figure 3. Cross sections for a) e e e ν¯eud results. and b) e+e− udu¯ d¯ versus C.M. energy→ with ◦ → θe 8 . The solid curves are for all diagrams 3.1. The non-radiative case and≥ dashed ones for three resonant graphs. The The contribution of the non-resonant diagrams dotted line in a) is the contribution from the γ − ¯ has been considered for two final states, e ν¯eud W and Z W processes. The estimates at 500− ¯ andudu ¯ d. Fig.3 shows the cross sections ver- GeV are indicated− by arrows. sus the center of mass energy around the W pair threshold. The solid line represents the case where all diagrams are included, the dashed line polar angle cut. The non-resonant contribution the contribution of the resonant diagrams only. vanishes as the cut is raised. In theudu ¯ d¯ channel, one can observe the onset of the Z resonant diagrams as a small shoulder 3.2. The radiative case starting around 2MZ . The behaviour below the In the covariant gauge, the GRACE package W pair threshold can be better seen in fig.4 where generates 752 diagrams when all the interactions the ratio of the three main resonant diagrams over are included, but actually 142 diagrams are used the complete calculation is plotted for the same in the unitary gauge with Higgs-fermion coupling − range of center of mass energy. In the e ν¯eud¯ being set to 0. The full tree level computation channel, the effect is of the order of 3% around requires, for a decent precision, some 100 hours √s = 160 GeV, while inudu ¯ d¯ it reaches± 28%. on a HP 735 computer. Thanks to the vectoriza- At the energy of future LC, 500 GeV, the− contri- tion of the integration package BASES, the most bution of non-resonant diagrams is quite signifi- extensive computation could be performed on the − cant in e ν¯eud¯ but is negligible inudu ¯ d¯. KEK vector processor within 1 hour.