Portland State University PDXScholar Political Science Faculty Publications and Presentations Political Science 2000 Biological Science in Conservation David Johns Portland State University,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/polisci_fac Part of the Environmental Policy Commons, and the Political Science Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Johns, David. Biological Science in Conservation. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-2. 2000 This Article is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible:
[email protected]. Biological Science in Conservation David M. Johns Abstract—Large-scale wildlands reserve systems offer one of the America (from Alaska and Greenland to Panama) that best hopes for slowing, if not reversing, the loss of biodiversity and would achieve the following conservation goals: 1) the pro- wilderness. Establishing such reserves requires both sound biology tection or recovery of all indigenous species in natural and effective advocacy. Attempts by The Wildlands Project and its patterns of abundance, emphasizing top predators, 2) the cooperators to meld science and advocacy in the service of conserva- protection of all ecosystem types and ecological processes in tion is working, but is not without some problems. Scientists and a healthy state, 3) the unencumbered operation of natural advocates have differences in methods of work, different under- disturbance regimes such as fire, and 4) resilience in the face standings of the origins and place of values in conservation, and of anthropogenic change, such as global climate change differing expectations about the efficacy of biological information in (Noss 1992).