Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus Mordax) Spawning Habitat on the Gulf of Maine Coast of Massachusetts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus Mordax) Spawning Habitat on the Gulf of Maine Coast of Massachusetts Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-30 Rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) spawning habitat on the Gulf of Maine coast of Massachusetts Bradford C. Chase Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station Gloucester, MA December, 2006 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Paul Diodati, Director Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Environmental Law Enforcement Dave Peters, Commissioner Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Robert W. Golledge, Jr., Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Mitt Romney, Governor EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) is a pelagic, schooling spawning substrate (Jones River and Ipswich River). fish that is common to the fish community in embayments The Charles, Neponset, Fore, and Mill River were all in and estuaries on the Gulf of Maine coast of Massachusetts. the range of 9,000 – 10,000 m2; and all other locations Similar to other anadromous species, smelt spend a period in the study area were considerably smaller. Although of maturation in marine waters then migrate above tidal no quantitative assessments were conducted on smelt influence to natal freshwater streams on spring spawning populations, monitoring observations indicate that during runs. Smelt populations in Massachusetts have long been the study period only the Neponset River, Fore River and valued for supporting popular sportfisheries, small-scale Back River contained large smelt runs that produced egg commercial fisheries and for the forage they provide to deposition approaching the capacity of available spawning many species of fish and wildlife. Smelt fisheries are a unique habitat (observed only during 1989 and 1994). cultural feature to our coastline as anglers pursue smelt in The typical spawning period was from mid-March the fall and winter when most other fishing opportunities until the mid-May. Egg deposition usually peaked in fade as gamefish migrate away from the coast. Smelt fishing April and was light and intermittent for most of May. The is valued as much for the camaraderie and fine tasting catch total temporal range when smelt eggs were present was as it is for the sport of reeling in this small fish. March 3rd to May 28th. The average water temperature Concerns for the status of smelt populations in at the onset of spawning runs was 5.3 ºC. However, the Massachusetts manifested from the sportfishing water temperature, date at the onset of spawning, and the communities in the 1980s and were supported by duration of the spawning period varied widely with some observations from Massachusetts Division of Marine dependence on the size of spawning habitat and seasonal Fisheries biologists. A common description of the smelt weather. The presence of smelt larvae was detected with resource in the latter half of the 20th century included the ichthyoplankton net sampling at 14 river stations. Smelt scenario of robust fall and winter fisheries and large spring larvae were present in the tidal waters downstream of the smelt runs in the 1960s and most of the 1970s, followed spawning habitat from April 14th through the end of the by sharply declining fisheries and smelt runs in the 1980s. monitoring period (May 31st), with peak catches occurring Throughout these periods, there has been little attention from mid-April to mid-May. given to the assessment of smelt populations and their Water chemistry measurements were made at the 64 spawning habitat. In order to support the management of spawning habitat stations for temperature, dissolved oxygen, this valuable resource a monitoring project was develop in pH, salinity and specific conductivity and compared to the late 1980s to delineate all smelt spawning habitat along Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards. All water the Gulf of Maine Coast in Massachusetts. temperature and dissolved oxygen measurements during During 1988-1995, most freshwater drainages (162) the spawning season were supportive of aquatic life, both from the New Hampshire border to the Cape Cod favorably influenced by the cool air temperature and higher Canal were surveyed for the presence of potential smelt discharge during the spring freshet. Routine violations of spawning habitat. Sixty-four spawning habitat stations Water Quality Standards (<6.5) for pH were observed in were established and monitoring focused on the spatial many rivers. Only two rivers in the South Coastal Drainage and temporal presence of demersal, adhesive smelt eggs. Area maintained spawning season mean pH above 6.5. The monitoring resulted in the designation of smelt runs Most rivers in this region had routine acidification that at 45 specific locations within 30 river systems in the could be a threat to smelt egg survival. following four major drainages: South Coastal Drainage Seven other diadromous fish species were observed Area (12), Boston Harbor Drainage Area (15), North during smelt spawning habitat monitoring. Only river Coastal Drainage Area (12), and Plum Island Sound and herring (both alewife and blueback herring) and American the Merrimack River (6). eel were observed routinely. Adult river herring were In each smelt run except the Charles River, smelt observed making upstream spawning migrations during began spawning at riffle habitat near the interface of salt May in 19 of the 30 river systems. American eel were seen and freshwater. Spawning progressed upstream beyond in 23 of the 30 river systems; typically as glass eels migrating tidal influence for as much as a kilometer. The upstream to freshwater habitats starting in late-March. limits of egg deposition for many rivers were physical The monitoring project raised substantial concerns for impediments that prevented further passage. There was a the health of smelt spawning habitat and status of smelt wide range to the size of smelt spawning habitats in the populations on the Gulf of Maine coast of Massachusetts. study area. More than half were less than 200 m in stream The following nine physical and chemical conditions length and less than 1,000 m2 in substrate area. Only two 2 were identified as clearly degrading the quality of stream specific spawning locations exceeded 10,000 m in available habitat for migrating adult smelt and smelt egg survival: i sedimentation, eutrophication, passage impediments, study. The next practical steps towards the goal of improving channel alterations, stream flow reduction, stormwater, tidal the Commonwealth’s smelt runs involve applying the influence, vegetative buffer loss, and acidification. Qualitative monitoring information to habitat and population scores were applied to rank degradation in all smelt runs, restoration. Better information on smelt population resulting in the highest summed scores for sedimentation status and the cause of habitat degradation is necessary for and eutrophication. The effects of eutrophication in the resource management and to identify restoration strategies form of excessive periphyton growth on substrate where for both smelt spawning habitat and smelt populations. smelt eggs incubate were nearly ubiquitous in the study Specific recommendations are made to achieve these goals. area and may represent the most significant threat to Concerns over smelt populations remain high as this report smelt spawning habitat in Massachusetts. It is likely that is published. In 2004, the National Marine Fisheries Service cumulative affects from all the negative influences are designated rainbow smelt as a “Species of Concern”. This combining to reduce the quantity and quality of spawning status applies to species for which there is concern and habitat and causing lower smelt egg survival and population uncertainty over their biological status and population recruitment. threats, and is a precursor to the designation of “Candidate Species” under Endangered Species Act review. The objective of documenting where smelt spawn on the Gulf of Maine coast of Massachusetts was met by this Rainbow smelt from Parker River spawning run. M.Ayer ii CONTENTS Executive Summary . i List of Contents . iii Acronyms . iv Conversions . iv Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION Study Area . 3 Methods . .3 Chapter 2. SPAWNING HABITAT SYNOPSIS FOR ALL REGIONS Physical Characteristics . .6 Spawning Period . 11 Water Chemistry . 13 Ichthyoplankton . .16 Observations of other Diadromous Fish . 17 Negative Influences on Spawning Habitat . 17 Discussion . .21 Recommendations . 23 Chapter 3. SOUTH SHORE REGION Plymouth Harbor . 29 Jones River . 33 Island Creek . 39 South River . 42 North River . 46 Satuit Brook . 58 Bound Brook . .60 Chapter 4. BOSTON HARBOR REGION Weir River . .66 Hingham Harbor . 70 Back River . .73 Fore River . .78 Town Brook (Quincy) . 85 Furnace Brook . 95 Neponset River . .99 Charles River . 105 Mystic River Basin . 110 Chapter 5. NORTH SHORE REGION Saugus River . 115 Salem Harbor . 121 Danvers River . 124 Manchester Bay . 132 Cape Ann . 139 Essex River . 144 Chapter 6. PLUM ISLAND SOUND AND MERRIMACK RIVER REGION Ipswich River . 149 Rowley River . 153 Parker River . 156 Merrimack River . 162 Acknowledgements . 167 Literature Cited . 168 Appendix A.Water Chemistry Tables . (separate document) B. Ichthyoplankton Tables . (separate document) iii LIST OF ACRONYMS ACOE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers cfs cubic feet per second CSO Combined Sewer Overflow CWA Clean Water Act CPUE catch per unit effort MDEP Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection DMF Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries DFW Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife DO dissolved
Recommended publications
  • Bay Shore Power Plant Cooling Water Intake Structure Information and I&E Sampling Data
    BAY SHORE POWER PLANT COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE INFORMATION AND I&E SAMPLING DATA Kinectrics Report: 112026-005-RA-0002-R00 January, 2008 Darlene Ager, Ph.D., David Marttila, Eng, Paul Patrick, Ph.D. Environmental and Aquatic Management Services PRIVATE INFORMATION Contents of this report shall not be disclosed without the consent of the Customer. Kinectrics has prepared this report in accordance with and subject to the contract Terms and Conditions between Kinectrics and FirstEnergy, dated October 7, 2004 © Kinectrics North America Inc., 2008 Kinectrics North America Inc., 800 Kipling Avenue Toronto, Ontario, Canada M8Z 6C4 BAY SHORE POWER PLANT COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE Kinectrics Report: 112026-005-RA-0002-R00 January, 2008 Darlene Ager, Ph.D., David Marttila, Eng. Paul Patrick, Ph.D. Environmental and Aquatic Management Services EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact to aquatic organisms that are impinged (being pinned against screens or outer part of a cooling water intake structure) or entrained (being drawn into and through cooling water systems). Phase II of the 316(b) rule for existing electric generating plants was designed to reduce impingement mortality by 80-95% and, if applicable, entrainment by 60-90%. In January 2007, the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals remanded several provisions of the Phase II rule on various grounds. The provisions remanded included: • EPA’s determination of the Best Technology Available under Section 316(b); • The rule’s performance standard ranges; • The cost-cost and cost-benefit compliance alternatives; • The Technology Installation and Operation Plan provision; • The restoration provisions; and • The “independent supplier” provision.
    [Show full text]
  • Forage Fishes of the Southeastern Bering Sea Conference Proceedings
    a OCS Study MMS 87-0017 Forage Fishes of the Southeastern Bering Sea Conference Proceedings 1-1 July 1987 Minerals Management Service Alaska OCS Region OCS Study MMS 87-0017 FORAGE FISHES OF THE SOUTHEASTERN BERING SEA Proceedings of a Conference 4-5 November 1986 Anchorage Hilton Hotel Anchorage, Alaska Prepared f br: U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Alaska OCS Region 949 East 36th Avenue, Room 110 Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4302 Under Contract No. 14-12-0001-30297 Logistical Support and Report Preparation By: MBC Applied Environmental Sciences 947 Newhall Street Costa Mesa, California 92627 July 1987 CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................. iv INTRODUCTION PAPERS Dynamics of the Southeastern Bering Sea Oceanographic Environment - H. Joseph Niebauer .................................. The Bering Sea Ecosystem as a Predation Controlled System - Taivo Laevastu .... Marine Mammals and Forage Fishes in the Southeastern Bering Sea - Kathryn J. Frost and Lloyd Lowry. ............................. Trophic Interactions Between Forage Fish and Seabirds in the Southeastern Bering Sea - Gerald A. Sanger ............................ Demersal Fish Predators of Pelagic Forage Fishes in the Southeastern Bering Sea - M. James Allen ................................ Dynamics of Coastal Salmon in the Southeastern Bering Sea - Donald E. Rogers . Forage Fish Use of Inshore Habitats North of the Alaska Peninsula - Jonathan P. Houghton ................................. Forage Fishes in the Shallow Waters of the North- leut ti an Shelf - Peter Craig ... Population Dynamics of Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii), Capelin (Mallotus villosus), and Other Coastal Pelagic Fishes in the Eastern Bering Sea - Vidar G. Wespestad The History of Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii) Fisheries in Alaska - Fritz Funk . Environmental-Dependent Stock-Recruitment Models for Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii) - Max Stocker.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Cat Cove James River T & a Hungars Creek White
    WILD CAT COVE WILD CAT COVE PUGENT SOUND // WASHINGTON 09 PUGENT SOUND // WASHINGTON 09 mineral notes with a briny finish mineral notes with a briny finish JAMES RIVER JAMES RIVER CHESAPEAKE BAY // VIRGINIA CHESAPEAKE BAY // VIRGINIA 06 06 mild with a sweet finish mild with a sweet finish T & A T & A CAPE COD BAY // MASSACHUSETTS 05 CAPE COD BAY // MASSACHUSETTS 05 melon notes with a clean finish melon notes with a clean finish HUNGARS CREEK HUNGARS CREEK HUNGARS CREEK // VIRGINIA 05 HUNGARS CREEK // VIRGINIA 05 medium size with a clean finish medium size with a clean finish WHITE STONE WHITE STONE CHESAPEAKE BAY // VIRGINIA 05 CHESAPEAKE BAY // VIRGINIA 05 petite with a mild, sweet finish petite with a mild, sweet finish BODIE ISLAND BODIE ISLAND ROANOKE SOUND // NORTH CAROLINA 04 ROANOKE SOUND // NORTH CAROLINA 04 deep cup, light brine deep cup, light brine 1. WILD CAT COVE 1. WILD CAT COVE PUGENT SOUND // WASHINGTON 09 PUGENT SOUND // WASHINGTON 09 mineral notes with a briny finish mineral notes with a briny finish 2. JAMES RIVER 2. JAMES RIVER CHESAPEAKE BAY // VIRGINIA 06 CHESAPEAKE BAY // VIRGINIA 06 mild with a sweet finish mild with a sweet finish 3. T & A 3. T & A CAPE COD BAY // MASSACHUSETTS 05 CAPE COD BAY // MASSACHUSETTS 05 melon notes with a clean finish melon notes with a clean finish 4. HUNGARS CREEK 4. HUNGARS CREEK HUNGARS CREEK // VIRGINIA 05 HUNGARS CREEK // VIRGINIA 04 medium size with a clean finish medium size with a clean finish 5. WHITE STONE 5. WHITE STONE CHESAPEAKE BAY // VIRGINIA 05 CHESAPEAKE BAY // VIRGINIA 05 petite with a mild, sweet finish petite with a mild, sweet finish 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Minutes
    Meeting Minutes Mira Riggin, Derby Street Neighborhood Association July 15, 2021 Present Beth Debski, Salem Partnership Seth Lattrell, Port Authority Bob McCarthy, Ward 1 Councilor Deputy/Planner Barbara Warren, Salem Sound Coastwatch Matthew Littell, Utile Pat Gozemba, Salem Alliance for the Environment Will Cohen, Utile Kate Fox, Destination Salem Elizabeth van der Els, Utile Fred Ryan, Public Safety Tom Skinner, Durand & Anastas John Russel, Ward 1 Resident Mayor Kimberley Driscoll, Mayor Paul DePrey, National Parks Service Capt. Bill McHugh, Salem Marine Kathryn Glenn, CZM Society/Harbormaster Other Attendees: Mike Magee Salem Municipal Harbor Plan (MHP) Harbor Plan Committee Meeting #7 Meeting Agenda ● Updates There was a proposal for the Ambulance facility on the o North River Franklin Street side of the property that does enable o Crescent Lot redevelopment on the water side but we have not o DPA Principles/ Offshore Wind seen the proposal. We are working through what is ● Planning Area Review best for the planning side of things in relation to o Community Waterfront o Industrial Port increasing public access. There have not been any o North Commercial Waterfront proposals for the other parcels adjacent to the Tourist Historic District o Ambulance facility. o South Commercial Waterfront ● Timeline and Next Steps Meeting Date, Time, and Location ● July 15, 2021 Crescent Lot ● Convened: 4:00 pm ● Adjourned: 5:45 pm The Crescent Lot is within the North River planning ● Zoom web conference area and is landlocked by the MBTA access road and Actions a rail line. There are unique challenges related to ● No voting occurred at this meeting grade change from Bridge Street that currently hinder ● Public Comment: Mike Magee pedestrian access.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic "Pelagic" Fish Underwater World
    QL DFO - Library / MPO - Bibliothèque 626 U5313 no.3 12064521 c.2 - 1 Atlantic "Pelagic" Fish Underwater World Fish that range the open sea are Pelagic species are generally very Atlantic known as " pelagic" species, to dif­ streamlined. They are blue or blue­ ferentiate them from "groundfish" gray over their backs and silvery­ "Pelagic" Fish which feed and dwell near the bot­ white underneath - a form of tom . Feeding mainly in surface or camouflage when in the open sea. middle depth waters, pelagic fish They are caught bath in inshore travel mostly in large schools, tu. n­ and offshore waters, principally with ing and manoeuvring in close forma­ mid-water trawls, purse seines, gill tion with split-second timing in their nets, traps and weirs. quest for plankton and other small species. Best known of the pelagic popula­ tions of Canada's Atlantic coast are herring, but others in order of economic importance include sal­ mon, mackerel , swordfish, bluefin tuna, eels, smelt, gaspereau and capelin. Sorne pelagic fish, notably salmon and gaspereau, migrate from freshwater to the sea and back again for spawning. Eels migrate in the opposite direction, spawning in sait water but entering freshwater to feed . Underwater World Herring comprise more than one­ Herring are processed and mar­ Atlantic Herring keted in various forms. About half of (Ctupea harengus) fifth of Atlantic Canada's annual fisheries catch. They are found all the catch is marketed fresh or as along the northwest Atlantic coast frozen whole dressed fish and fillets, from Cape Hatteras to Hudson one-quarter is cured , including Strait.
    [Show full text]
  • Vii Fishery-At-A-Glance Night Smelt Scientific Name: Spirinchus Starksi Range
    Fishery-at-a-Glance Night Smelt Scientific Name: Spirinchus starksi Range: Night Smelt are distributed coast-wide from southeast Alaska to Point Arguello, Santa Barbara County. Habitat: Night Smelt occur in the surf and in depths from the surface to approximately 400 feet (122 meters). Size (length and weight): Night Smelt measure less than 6 inches total length (140 millimeters) weighing to 11 grams. Males are slightly longer and heavier than females. Life span: Night Smelt are short lived and believed to reach a maximum of 2 to 3 years. Reproduction: Spawning occurs in the surf along open coast coarse sand beaches from January to September. Eggs are fertilized in the wash of the surf, adhere to sand grains, and sink. Hatching occurs in approximately 2 weeks. Prey: Night Smelt feed on small crustaceans—primarily gammarid amphipods and mysid shrimp. Predators: Night Smelt provide forage for a wide range of predators, including Striped Bass, Redtail Surfperch, salmon, Harbor Seals, California Sea Lions, terns, gulls, and cormorants. Fishery: Commercial and recreational fisheries are shore-based. Area fished: Historically, fishing occurred from Moss Landing, Monterey County to the Oregon border. Currently, fishing occurs from San Mateo County to Del Norte County. Fishing season: Fishing occurs during the spawning season—January to September. Fishing gear: Fishermen fish from shore using A-frame dip nets. Market(s): Landed fish are sold for human consumption and aquarium food. Current stock status: No formal stock assessments exist for Night Smelt. Although catch rates have increased on average since the early 2000s, it is undetermined if this increase in the index is due to increased abundance or changes in fishermen behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Forage Fish Management Plan
    Oregon Forage Fish Management Plan November 19, 2016 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Resources Program 2040 SE Marine Science Drive Newport, OR 97365 (541) 867-4741 http://www.dfw.state.or.us/MRP/ Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Federal action to protect Forage Fish (2016)............................................................................................ 7 The Oregon Marine Fisheries Management Plan Framework .................................................................. 7 Relationship to Other State Policies ......................................................................................................... 7 Public Process Developing this Plan .......................................................................................................... 8 How this Document is Organized .............................................................................................................. 8 A. Resource Analysis ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rainbow Smelt Spawning Monitoring
    PROGRESS REPORT State: NEW HAMPSHIRE Grant: F-61-R-22/F19AF00061 Grant Title: NEW HAMPSHIRE’S MARINE FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS Project I: DIADROMOUS FISH INVESTIGATIONS Job 2: MONITORING OF RAINBOW SMELT SPAWNING ACTIVITY Objective: To annually monitor the Rainbow Smelt Osmerus mordax resource using fishery independent techniques during their spawning run in the Great Bay Estuary. Period Covered: January 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019 ABSTRACT In 2019, a total of 844 Rainbow Smelt Osmerus mordax (349 in Oyster River, 405 in Winnicut River, and 90 in Squamscott River) were caught in fyke nets. The CPUE in 2019 was highest in the Oyster River with 23.79 smelt per day, whereas the Winnicut River (8.46 smelt per day) and Squamscott River (5.54 smelt per day) were lower. A male-skewed sex ratio was observed at all rivers, a likely result of differences in spawning behavior between sexes. The age distribution of captured Rainbow Smelt, weighted by total catch was highest for age-2 fish, followed by age-1, age-3, and age-4 fish. Most water quality measurements (temperature, dissolved oxygen, specific conductivity, and pH) were within or near acceptable ranges for smelt spawning and egg incubation and development in 2019; however, turbidity was above the threshold in the Oyster River for most days monitored. INTRODUCTION Rainbow Smelt Osmerus mordax are small anadromous fish that live in nearshore coastal waters and spawn in the spring in tidal rivers immediately above the head of tide in freshwater (Kendall 1926; Murawski et al. 1980; Buckley 1989). Anadromous smelt serve as important prey for commercial and recreational culturally valuable species, such as Atlantic Cod Gadus morhua, Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar, and Striped Bass Morone saxatilis (Clayton et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Acushnet River Restoration Project: Restoring Diadromous Populations to a Superfund Site in Southeastern Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-56 The Acushnet River Restoration Project: Restoring Diadromous Populations to a Superfund Site in Southeastern Massachusetts J.J. Sheppard1, S. Block2, H.L Becker3, and D. Quinn4 1Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries South Shore Field Station 1213 Purchase Street, 3rd Floor New Bedford, MA 02740 2National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Restoration Center 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 3EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc 221 Sun Valley Boulevard, Suite D Lincoln, NE 68528 4DQ Engineering 11 Hickory Lane Walpole, MA 02081 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Department of Fish and Game Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Technical March 2014 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Series Managing Editor: Michael P. Armstrong Technical and Copy Editor: Elaine Brewer The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Reports present information and data pertinent to the management, biology and commercial and recreational fisheries of anadromous, estuarine, and marine organisms of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and adjacent waters. The series presents information in a timely fashion that is of limited scope or is useful to a smaller, specific audience and therefore may not be appropriate for national or international journals. Included in this series are data summaries, reports of monitoring programs, and results of studies that are directed at specific management problems. All Reports in the series are available for download in PDF format at: http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dmf/publications/technical.html or hard copies may be obtained from the Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Ave., Gloucester, MA 01930 USA (978-282-0308).
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhood Overviews
    NEIGHBORHOOD OVERVIEWS (Sources: The following text is largely quoted from Leslie Donovan and Kim Withers Brengle, “A Preservation Plan for the City of Gloucester, Massachusetts,” 1990. Supplemental information was added from the Gloucester Development Team’s Land Marks; Architecture and Preservation in Gloucester, 1979; an unpublished manuscript, “Artists’ Communities in Gloucester, 1750-1948,” by Wendy Frontiero, 1998; and comments from the Gloucester Archives Committee.) CENTRAL GLOUCESTER Central Gloucester is roughly bounded by the Inner Harbor, the Annisquam River, and Route 128. This commercial and civic center of the City of Gloucester, located west of the inner harbor, is the nucleus of the Central Gloucester neighborhood and the City. The central business district runs along Main and Rogers Streets and is characterized by two- to four-story masonry structures. Immediately to the west is the civic center, which is composed of the City’s public buildings, by far the largest group of substantial buildings in Gloucester. The greatest concentration of industrial buildings is also found in Central Gloucester, located along the waterfront, near the commercial areas, and along Maplewood Avenue. Central Gloucester is extremely densely developed compared to the rest of Gloucester. Residential buildings are typically single-family and multi-family structures of wood-frame construction. A fishing colony established by the Dorchester Company at Stage Fort lasted only from 1623- 1626. It was not until the late 1630s that Cape Ann attracted a large enough number of permanent settlers to warrant incorporation as a town in 1642 under the Massachusetts Bay Colony. The name of the new town may have come from the recent birth of a new Duke of Gloucester.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Statistical Sampling for the Estimation of River Herring Run Size Using Visual Counts
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by State Library of Massachusetts Electronic Repository Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-25 A Guide to Statistical Sampling for the Estimation of River Herring Run Size Using Visual Counts Gary A. Nelson Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Department of Fish and Game Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Commonwealth of Massachusetts February 2006 Technical Report Technical Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Series Managing Editor: Michael P. Armstrong The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Reports present information and data pertinent to the management, biology and commercial and recreational fisheries of anadromous, estuarine, and marine organisms of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and adjacent waters. The series presents information in a timely fashion that is of limited scope or is useful to a smaller, specific audience and therefore may not be appropriate for national or international journals. Included in this series are data summaries, reports of monitoring programs, and results of studies that are directed at specific management problems. All Reports in the series are available for download in PDF format at: http://www.mass.gov/marinefisheries/publications/technical.htm or hard copies may be obtained from the Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Ave., Gloucester, MA 01930 USA (978-282-0308). TR-1 McKiernan, D.J., and D.E. Pierce. 1995. The Loligo squid fishery in Nantucket and Vineyard Sound. TR-2 McBride, H.M., and T.B. Hoopes. 2001. 1999 Lobster fishery statistics. TR-3 McKiernan, D.J., R.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006/09/20-E-MAIL: (Intergovernmental) Re: Rainbow Smelt Data
    Page 1 of 1 Duda, Steve From: Chase, Brad (FWE) [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 8:57 AM To: Duda, Steve Cc: Ayer, Matt (FWE) Subject: RE: rainbow smelt data Attachments: Jones river catch table-05.xls; Final Report 2004.doc Steve, Here are the Jones River catch data for our smelt fyke net project. I recently finished the 2005 audit and we are entering 2006 data now. Let me know if you would like more details. I will have the 2005 report done in about a month and have the summary 2006 data available about the same time. It is important to note that we changed nets in 2005. We used a very small fyke net in 2004. We have used the same net in 2005 and 2006 with good success. I'm sorry about the delay in meeting your request. I should not have been so optimistic about our ability to process data during the summer field season. Sincerely, Brad. Bradford C. Chase Marine Fisheries Biologist Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries 30 Emerson Avenue Gloucester, MA 01930 978-282-0308 xl 11; 617-727-3337 (fax) -----Original Message ----- From: Duda, Steve [mailto: Steve. [email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 4:08 PM To: Chase, Brad (FWE) Cc: Duda, Steve Subject: rainbow smelt data Brad, per our conversation earlier today, I am requesting any recent data that you may have on rainbow smelt in Massachusetts. You mentioned that a report is available for 2004, a data audit has been done for 2005 and a summary table will be available based on the 2006 monitoring.
    [Show full text]