Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Maxwell Institute Publications 2016 Apocalypse: Reading Revelation 21-22 Julie M. Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi Part of the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Julie M., "Apocalypse: Reading Revelation 21-22" (2016). Maxwell Institute Publications. 10. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi/10 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maxwell Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact
[email protected],
[email protected]. Introduction Julie M. Smith In what would become the standard explanation of how parables work, biblical scholar C. H. Dodd proclaimed that the parable “arrest[s] the hearer by its vividness of strangeness, and leave[s] the mind in sufcient doubt about its precise application to tease it into active thought.”1 What is true of parables is doubly, if not triply, true of the book of Revelation. Two millennia have apparently not been enough for a consensus to emerge regarding the interpretation of this enigmatic text. Why is that? The book itself gives us two clues in its very rst verse, where John describes the text and how it came to be. First, he calls it an apokalypsis (see Revelation 1:1). We recognize the English cognate apocalypse and think, perhaps, of big-budget disaster movies, but the Greek word has a different nuance: it means “uncovering.” The author thus describes his task in writing as one of uncovering truth for the reader, but what truths does he intend to uncover, and how are they to be uncovered? These questions bring us to our second clue: as the Revelator describes the process by which the revelation was transmitted, he explains that it was “signied” by an angel (Revelation 1:1).