Here Was Not Enough Officers in the Streets, the People Knew That Those Involved Were in the Necessary Place an the Necessary Time

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Here Was Not Enough Officers in the Streets, the People Knew That Those Involved Were in the Necessary Place an the Necessary Time Maps of the Future - a modern crime-analysis- and crime-prediction-based tool to increase the effectiveness and quality of public administration performance in crime prevention Beneficiary: The Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic, Security Policy and Crime Prevention Department, Prevention Programmes, Volunteer Services and Human Rights Unit Supplier: For the project purposes, the association of ACCENDO – Science and Research Centre, and PROCES – Regional and Municipal Development Centre has been created Science and research institute ACCENDO – Science and Research Centre Address: Švabinského 1749/19, Ostrava Tel.: +420 596 112 649 Web: http://accendo.cz E-mail: [email protected] PROCES – Regional and Municipal Development Centre Address: Švabinského 1749/19, Ostrava Phone: +420 595 136 023 Web: http://rozvoj-obce.cz E-mail: [email protected] Authors: Doc. Ing. Lubor Hruška, Ph.D. Ing. Ivana Foldynová, Ph.D. RNDr. Ivan Šotkovský, Ph.D. PhDr. Ladislava Zapletalová Mgr. Bc. Tomáš Václavík Mgr. Bc. Ivan Žurovec Ing. Radek Fujak Ing. Jiří Ševčík Submitted as of August 24th 2015 2 Maps of the Future - a modern crime-analysis- and crime-prediction-based tool to increase the effectiveness and quality of public administration performance in crime prevention CONTENTS 1. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................. 7 2. PREFACE ...................................................................................................... 11 3. ABSTRACT .................................................................................................... 16 4. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 17 5. OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................... 18 6. USE OF SPATIAL INFORMATION AND TOOLS .......................................... 28 6.1. INTRODUCTION TO GIS AND SPATIAL DATA ANALYSES ................. 28 6.1.1. GIS .................................................................................................. 28 6.1.2. Spatial data analyses ...................................................................... 31 6.2. SELECTED METHODS AND PROCESSES ........................................... 34 6.2.1. Hotspot analyses ............................................................................ 34 6.2.2. Heat maps ...................................................................................... 39 6.2.3. Repeat victimisation ........................................................................ 40 6.2.4. Risk terrain modeling ...................................................................... 43 6.2.5. Geographic profiling ........................................................................ 46 6.2.6. Data mining ..................................................................................... 49 6.3. DATA ANALYSIS IN POLICING .............................................................. 54 6.3.1. Predictive policing and the role of analysis ..................................... 54 7. SOFTWARE TOOLS...................................................................................... 60 7.1. HUNCHLAB ............................................................................................. 61 7.1.1. Data ................................................................................................ 62 7.1.2. Results of predictions ...................................................................... 67 7.2. CRIMEVIEW DASHBOARD .................................................................... 68 7.2.1. Predictive missions ......................................................................... 71 7.3. PREDPOL ............................................................................................... 72 7.4. NEAR-REPEAT CALCULATOR .............................................................. 75 7.5. CRIMESTAT ............................................................................................ 76 7.6. ArcGIS ..................................................................................................... 78 7.6.1. ArcGIS for Desktop ......................................................................... 79 7.6.2. Selected extensions for ArcGIS ...................................................... 81 7.6.3. ArcGIS Server ................................................................................. 83 3 Maps of the Future - a modern crime-analysis- and crime-prediction-based tool to increase the effectiveness and quality of public administration performance in crime prevention 7.7. GEOTIME ................................................................................................ 85 7.8. IBM SPSS ................................................................................................ 88 7.8.1. Modules of IBM SPSS Statistics ..................................................... 88 7.8.2. IBM SPSS Modeler ......................................................................... 90 7.9. ORACLE .................................................................................................. 92 7.10. PRECOBS ............................................................................................... 94 8. EXAMPLES FROM THE INDIVIDUAL COUNTRIES ..................................... 95 8.1. CZECH REPUBLIC ................................................................................. 95 8.1.1. Initial situation (focused on the National Police Force) ................... 95 8.1.2. Structure of the National Police Force ............................................ 96 8.1.3. Analytical activities in the National Police Force ............................. 98 8.1.4. GIS of the National Police Force ................................................... 101 8.1.5. Kolín .............................................................................................. 105 8.1.6. Uherské Hradiště .......................................................................... 115 8.1.7. Pardubice ...................................................................................... 125 8.2. GREAT BRITAIN ................................................................................... 134 8.2.1. London .......................................................................................... 135 8.2.2. Greater Manchester ...................................................................... 144 8.2.3. Kent .............................................................................................. 153 8.2.4. Cambridgeshire ............................................................................. 161 8.2.5. Home Office .................................................................................. 167 8.3. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ........................................................... 173 8.3.1. Los Angeles .................................................................................. 174 8.3.2. San Diego ..................................................................................... 185 8.3.3. Lancaster ...................................................................................... 194 8.3.4. Tempe ........................................................................................... 205 8.4. AUSTRIA ............................................................................................... 214 8.4.1. Styria ............................................................................................. 216 8.4.2. Vienna ........................................................................................... 221 8.4.3. CriPA – Criminal Predictive Analysis ............................................ 226 8.5. SWITZERLAND ..................................................................................... 237 8.6. GERMANY ............................................................................................ 244 8.7. ITALY ..................................................................................................... 250 4 Maps of the Future - a modern crime-analysis- and crime-prediction-based tool to increase the effectiveness and quality of public administration performance in crime prevention 8.8. POLAND ................................................................................................ 259 8.9. SLOVAKIA ............................................................................................. 268 9. EVALUATION OF APPROACHES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR THE CZECH REPUBLIC ................................................................................................... 281 9.1. SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 281 9.1.1. Basic summary of benefits of each example ................................. 287 9.2. INITIAL REMARKS ................................................................................ 292 9.2.1. Summary of the situation in the Czech Republic and abroad ....... 292 9.2.2. Summary of target groups' opinions obtained during workshops .. 296 9.2.3. Assessment criteria ....................................................................... 298 9.3. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CZECH REPUBLIC ......................... 300 9.3.1. Organisation.................................................................................. 300 9.3.2. Technological recommendations .................................................. 302 9.3.3. Methodological recommendations ...............................................
Recommended publications
  • Prawa Człowieka a Policja
    Prawa człowieka a policja I. Wprowadzenie 1. Policja jest organem ochrony porzdku prawnego najbardziej widocznym w yciu społeczestwa. Zadaniem policji jest bowiem bezporednia, codzienna ochrona prawa, porzdku i bezpieczestwa publicznego. Kontakt jednostki z policjantem to najczciej wystpujce bezporednie zetknicie si z reprezentujcym władz pastwow funkcjonariuszem publicznym. Prawo, szanowane w praktyce przez funkcjonariuszy pastwa prawa, słuy nie tylko obywatelom, lecz take władzy i tyme funkcjonariuszom. Policjant jest wic (a przynajmniej powinien by) sług prawa, czsto bdc jednoczenie jego pierwszym interpretatorem, który decyduje o tym, czy prawo zostało naruszone, i o sposobie ochrony naruszonego porzdku 1. 2. Oznak przemian, jakie nastpiły w Polsce w ostatnich latach, jest m. in. wykazywana w sondaach opinii publicznej wysoka aprobata dla policji w Polsce po 1989 roku 2. Przyczyniły si do tego zmiany prawne okrelajce granice władzy, a take uwzgldnienie w tzw. ustawach policyjnych i przepisach wykonawczych regulujcych funkcjonowanie policji, podstawowych midzynarodowych standardów, okrelajcych postpowanie policji. Podstawowy kanon owych standardów obejmuje m. in.: zasady uycia siły oraz broni palnej, zakaz stosowania tortur oraz innego okrutnego, nieludzkiego lub poniajcego traktowania albo karania, postpowanie w stosunku do osób zatrzymanych, tymczasowo aresztowanych lub uwizionych, przestrzeganie prawa do prywatnoci oraz prawo do pokojowego zgromadzania si. II. Polskie prawo policyjne a wybrane standardy praw człowieka 1. Prawo policyjne to system norm okrelajcych oraz regulujcych struktur, ustrój i działalno organów zajmujcych si ochron bezpieczestwa i porzdku publicznego, a w szczególnoci prawa i obowizki tych organów, w tym zakres i sposób podejmowanych przez nie działa 3. Obowizujce w Polsce prawo policyjne jest efektem przemian ostatnich lat. W duym popiechu, wymuszonym społecznymi zmianami, ustawodawca starał si zmniejszy dystans dzielcy polskie unormowania od standardów pastw prawnych.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLISH POLICE Collaboration in the Holocaust
    THE POLISH POLICE Collaboration in the Holocaust Jan Grabowski The Polish Police Collaboration in the Holocaust Jan Grabowski INA LEVINE ANNUAL LECTURE NOVEMBER 17, 2016 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. First printing, April 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Jan Grabowski THE INA LEVINE ANNUAL LECTURE, endowed by the William S. and Ina Levine Foundation of Phoenix, Arizona, enables the Center to bring a distinguished scholar to the Museum each year to conduct innovative research on the Holocaust and to disseminate this work to the American public. Wrong Memory Codes? The Polish “Blue” Police and Collaboration in the Holocaust In 2016, seventy-one years after the end of World War II, the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs disseminated a long list of “wrong memory codes” (błędne kody pamięci), or expressions that “falsify the role of Poland during World War II” and that are to be reported to the nearest Polish diplomat for further action. Sadly—and not by chance—the list elaborated by the enterprising humanists at the Polish Foreign Ministry includes for the most part expressions linked to the Holocaust. On the long list of these “wrong memory codes,” which they aspire to expunge from historical narrative, one finds, among others: “Polish genocide,” “Polish war crimes,” “Polish mass murders,” “Polish internment camps,” “Polish work camps,” and—most important for the purposes of this text—“Polish participation in the Holocaust.” The issue of “wrong memory codes” will from time to time reappear in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Geotime As an Adjunct Analysis Tool for Social Media Threat Analysis and Investigations for the Boston Police Department Offeror: Uncharted Software Inc
    GeoTime as an Adjunct Analysis Tool for Social Media Threat Analysis and Investigations for the Boston Police Department Offeror: Uncharted Software Inc. 2 Berkeley St, Suite 600 Toronto ON M5A 4J5 Canada Business Type: Canadian Small Business Jurisdiction: Federally incorporated in Canada Date of Incorporation: October 8, 2001 Federal Tax Identification Number: 98-0691013 ATTN: Jenny Prosser, Contract Manager, [email protected] Subject: Acquiring Technology and Services of Social Media Threats for the Boston Police Department Uncharted Software Inc. (formerly Oculus Info Inc.) respectfully submits the following response to the Technology and Services of Social Media Threats RFP. Uncharted accepts all conditions and requirements contained in the RFP. Uncharted designs, develops and deploys innovative visual analytics systems and products for analysis and decision-making in complex information environments. Please direct any questions about this response to our point of contact for this response, Adeel Khamisa at 416-203-3003 x250 or [email protected]. Sincerely, Adeel Khamisa Law Enforcement Industry Manager, GeoTime® Uncharted Software Inc. [email protected] 416-203-3003 x250 416-708-6677 Company Proprietary Notice: This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed – in whole or in part – for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, a contract is awarded to this offeror as a result of – or in connection with – the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. GeoTime as an Adjunct Analysis Tool for Social Media Threat Analysis and Investigations 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcgis® + Geotime®: GIS Technology to Support the Analysis Of
    ® ® In many application areas, this is not enough: Geo- spatial and temporal correlations between the data ArcGIS + GeoTime : GIS technology should be studied, so that, on the basis of this insight, the available data - more and more numerous - can to support the analysis of telephone be translated into knowledge and therefore in appropriate decisions . In the area of ​​security, to name an example, all this results in the predictive traffic data analysis of the spatial-temporal occurrence of crimes. Lastly, a technologically advanced GIS platform must Giorgio Forti, Miriam Marta, Fabrizio Pauri ® ensure data sharing and enable the world of mobile devices (system of engagement). ® There are several ways to share data / information, all supported by ArcGIS, such as: sharing within a single Historical mobile phone traffic billboards analysis is organization, according to the profiles assigned becoming increasingly important in investigative Figure 2: Sample data representation of two (identity); the sharing of multiple organizations that activities of public security organizations around the cellphone users in GeoTime may / should share confidential data (a very common world, and leading technology companies have been situation in both Public Security and Emergency trying to respond to the strong demand for the most Other predefined analysis features are already Management); public communication, open to all (for suitable tools for supporting such activities. available (automatic cluster search, who attends sites example, to report investigative success, or to of investigation interest, mobility compatibility with communicate to citizens unsafe areas for the Originally developed as a project funded in the United participation in events, etc.), allowing considerable frequency of criminal offenses).
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Mapping and Analysis by Community Organizations
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice National Institute of Justice R e s e a r c h i n B r i e f March 2001 Issues and Findings Crime Mapping and Analysis Discussed in this Brief: An as- sessment of how community orga- by Community Organizations nizations in Hartford, Connecticut, used the Neighborhood Problem Solving (NPS) system, a computer- in Hartford, Connecticut based mapping and crime analysis technology. The NPS system en- By Thomas Rich abled users to create a variety of maps and other reports depicting Crime mapping has become increasingly community policing field offices. Devel- crime conditions by accessing a popular among law enforcement agencies oped with NIJ funding, the system enables database containing the most re- and has enjoyed high visibility at the Fed- users to create a variety of maps and other cent 2 years of incident-level police information. eral level, in the media, and among the reports depicting crime conditions by us- largest police departments in the Nation, ing a database containing the most recent Key issues: The objective in Hart- most notably those in Chicago and New 2 years of incident-level police informa- ford was to extend basic mapping York City. However, there have been few tion, including citizen-initiated calls for and crime analysis technologies efforts to make crime mapping capabilities service, reported crimes, and arrests. Al- beyond the law enforcement com- available to community residents and or- though some police departments routinely munity by putting them into the ganizations, although a National Institute publish aggregate crime statistics and a hands of neighborhood-based organizations so they could analyze of Justice (NIJ)-funded project in Chicago few publish incident-level crime informa- incident-level data and produce in the late 1980s aimed at introducing tion on the Internet, the objective in Hart- their own maps and reports.
    [Show full text]
  • BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT | BOSTON REGIONAL INTELLIGENCE CENTER Alexa Lambros, Class of 2018
    BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT | BOSTON REGIONAL INTELLIGENCE CENTER Alexa Lambros, Class of 2018 The BRIC interns with the BPD Chief of Police! MY ROLE: ASSISTANT CRIME ANALYST/RESEARCH ASSISTANT SPECIAL PROJECT • Mission/Goal Community policing; “working in partnership with the community to fight crime, STANDARD RESPONSIBILITIES reduce fear and improve the quality of life in our • Took raw data from UASI neighborhoods” (BPDnews.com) DAILY INFORMATION INFORMATION crime mapping database of all property stolen from • Size 20th largest LEA in the country; 3rd largest in SUMMARY REQUESTS • Fulfilled information retrieval 9/2015 – 2/2016 New England (Wikipedia) • Assembled packets of recent gang • Utilized Excel skills to • Organization 8 Bureaus and 12 districts incidents and summarized reports requests for Boston/UASI police, correctional, and probation officers organize/categorize data • Focus/Success Utilizes unique combination of • Researched arrests from Urban • Evaulated relationships community relations and statistical analysis to Area Security Initiative (UASI) between numerous elements of reduce crime throughout city; over the last four districts and summarized reports BULLETINS collected data and drew decades, Boston has achieved a large decrease in • Compiled incident summaries on • Created ID Wanted, Wanted, relevant conclusions its overall crime rate (BPDnews.com) violent and property crime within Missing Person, and BOLO bulletins • IMPORTANCE: Created Boston and UASI districts into BRIC's at request of Boston/UASI officers infographic
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Vehicle Theft: Crime and Spatial Analysis in a Non-Urban Region
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Motor Vehicle Theft: Crime and Spatial Analysis in a Non-Urban Region Author(s): Deborah Lamm Weisel ; William R. Smith ; G. David Garson ; Alexi Pavlichev ; Julie Wartell Document No.: 215179 Date Received: August 2006 Award Number: 2003-IJ-CX-0162 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Crime and Spatial Analysis of Vehicle Theft in a Non-Urban Region Motor vehicle theft in non-urban areas does not reveal the well-recognized hot spots often associated with crime in urban areas. These findings resulted from a study of 2003 vehicle thefts in a four-county region of western North Carolina comprised primarily of small towns and unincorporated areas. While the study suggested that point maps have limited value for areas with low volume and geographically-dispersed crime, the steps necessary to create regional maps – including collecting and validating crime locations with Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates – created a reliable dataset that permitted more in-depth analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernizacja Wyposażenia Policji
    BIURO LOGISTYKI POLICJI Modernizacja wyposażenia Policji Z uwagi na fakt, że pistolet samopowtarzalny jest podstawo- BROŃ PALNA KRÓTKA wym rodzajem uzbrojenia policjanta, należy dążyć do tego, by był bronią nowoczesną, wytrzymałą w służbie, niezawodną, celną i dysponującą pojemnym, kilkunastonabojowym maga- OD KAL. 9X18 MM MAKAROW zynkiem. Korzystne byłoby także, by był to produkt krajowy, DO KAL. 9X19 MM PARABELLUM co w znacznym stopniu ułatwiłoby zaopatrywanie w niezbęd- W bogatym katalogu indywidualnego wyposażenia policjanta ne części zamienne oraz profesjonalne serwisowanie. szczególnie ważną pozycję zajmuje pistolet samopowtarzalny. Ponadto niezwykle istotnym aspektem związanym z bronią Do początku lat 90. XX wieku na wyposażeniu Policji znajdo- jest amunicja, którą jest ona zasilana. wały się prawie wyłącznie pistolety P-64 oraz P-83 skonstru- Jak wcześniej wspomniano, nabój pistoletowy kal. 9x18 mm owane i produkowane w kraju. Zasilane były amunicją pisto- Makarow jest pod względem balistycznym nabojem przesta- letową kal. 9x18 mm (Makarow), czyli standardową amunicją rzałym i zdecydowanie ustępuje pola w tym zakresie nabojowi pistoletową państw byłego Układu Warszawskiego. kal. 9x19 mm Parabellum, który stanowi obecnie najpopu- W ciągu wieloletniej służby pistolety te wyeksploatowały się larniejszy nabój pistoletowy na świecie, a także jest standar- i stały się technologicznie przestarzałe, w konsekwencji nie dowym nabojem pistoletowym użytkowanym przez państwa były w stanie spełnić obecnie obowiązujących wysokich wy- członkowskie
    [Show full text]
  • Stories in Geotime
    Stories in GeoTime Ryan Eccles, Thomas Kapler, Robert Harper, William Wright Information Visualization ( 2008 ) © Stefan John 2008 Summer term 2008 1 Introduction • Story a powerful abstraction − Used by intelligence analysts to conceptualize threats and understand patterns − Part of the analytical process • Oculus Info’s GeoTime™ − Geo-temporal event visualization tool − Augmented with story system − Narratives, hypertext-linked visualizations, visual annotations, and pattern detection − Environment for analytic exploration and communication − Detects geo-temporal patterns − Integrates story narration to increase analytic sense-making cohesion Summer term 2008 2 1 Introduction • Assisting the analyst in: − Identifying, − Extracting, − Arranging, and − Presenting stories within the data • Story system − Lets analysts operate at story level − Higher level abstractions of data (behaviors and events) − Staying connected to the evidence − Developed in collaboration with analysts • Formal evaluation showed high utility and usability Summer term 2008 3 Overview • Storytelling • Related Work • Geo-Temporal Visualization in GeoTime • Stories in GeoTime • Evaluation Summer term 2008 4 2 Storytelling • First described in Aristotle’s Poetics − Objects of a tragedy (story): - Plot -> arrangements of incidents -Character - Thought -> processes of reasoning leading characters to their respective behavior • Narrative theory suggests: − People are essentially storytellers − Implicit ability to evaluate a story for: - Consistency -Detail - Structure Summer
    [Show full text]
  • Page 621 TITLE 18—CRIMES and CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 2725
    Page 621 TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 2725 (1) ‘‘motor vehicle record’’ means any record 227. Sentences .............................................. 3551 that pertains to a motor vehicle operator’s 228. Death sentence .................................... 3591 permit, motor vehicle title, motor vehicle reg- 228A. Post-conviction DNA testing ............ 3600 istration, or identification card issued by a de- 229. Post-Sentence Administration 2 ....... 3601 partment of motor vehicles; [231. Repealed.] (2) ‘‘person’’ means an individual, organiza- 232. Miscellaneous Sentencing Provi- tion or entity, but does not include a State or sions 1 .................................................. 3661 agency thereof; 232A. Special forfeiture of collateral (3) ‘‘personal information’’ means informa- profits of crime ................................ 3681 tion that identifies an individual, including an 233. Contempts ............................................. 3691 individual’s photograph, social security num- 235. Appeal .................................................... 3731 ber, driver identification number, name, ad- 237. Crime victims’ rights .......................... 3771 dress (but not the 5-digit zip code), telephone AMENDMENTS number, and medical or disability informa- tion, but does not include information on ve- 2006—Pub. L. 109–164, title I, § 103(a)(2), Jan. 10, 2006, hicular accidents, driving violations, and driv- 119 Stat. 3563, added item for chapter 212A. 2004—Pub. L. 108–405, title I, § 102(b), title IV, 1 er’s status. § 411(a)(2), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2264, 2284, added items (4) ‘‘highly restricted personal information’’ for chapters 228A and 237. means an individual’s photograph or image, 2000—Pub. L. 106–523, § 2(b), Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. social security number, medical or disability 2492, added item for chapter 212. information; and 1994—Pub. L. 103–359, title VIII, § 803(c)(1), Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • L'arma Dei Carabinieri
    L'Arma dei Carabinieri Revision date: 1 March 2017 © 2016-2017 Ary Boender & Utility DXers Forum – UDXF www.udxf.nl Country name: Repubblica Italiana (Italian Republic) Short name: Italia (Italy) Capital: Roma (Rome) 15 regions: Abruzzo, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Emilia-Romagna, Lazio, Liguria, Lombardia, Marche, Molise, Piemonte, Puglia, Toscana, Umbria, Veneto 5 autonomous Friuli-Venezia Giulia; Sardegna (Sardinia); Sicilia; Trentino-Alto Adige (Trentino-South regions: Tyrol or Trentino-Suedtirol); Valle d'Aosta (Vallee d'Aoste) Military branches: Esercito Italiano (Army), Marina Militare Italiana (Navy), Aeronautica Militare Italiana (Air Force), Arma dei Carabinieri (Carabinieri), Guardia di Finanza (Finacial Guard) , Corpo delle Capitanerie di porto - Guardia costiera (Corps of Port Authorities - Coast Guard) Police forces: Polizia di Stato (State Police), Polizia di Quartiere (Quarter Police), Polizia Penitenziaria (Prison Guards), Corpo Forestale dello Stato (National Forestry Department), Direzione Investigativa Antimafia –DIA- (Anti-Mafia Investigation Department), Direzione Centrale per i Servizi Antidroga (Central Directorate for Anti- Drug Services), Polizia Provinciale (Provincial Police), Polizia Municipale (Municipal Police) Picture by GiovanniIan L'Arma dei Carabinieri The corps was created by King Victor Emmanuel I of Savoy in 1726. The corps is headed by the Comando, consisting of the Comandante Generale (a General), the Vice-Comandante Generale ( a Lieutenant General) and the Chief of Staff, all located in Rome. The Chief of Staff directs, coordinates and supervises all activities of the force. It directly supervises the Directors of Administration, Health, Engineering, the motor pool and the Veterinary Commission. The Carabinieri are organised on a territorial basis for law-enforcement missions. The territorial organization represents the core of the institution; it contains 80 percent of the force and is organized hierarchically in five inter-regional, 19 regional and 102 provincial commands.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-07-815 Federal Law Enforcement Mandatory Basic Training
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters GAO August 2007 FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT Survey of Federal Civilian Law Enforcement Mandatory Basic Training GAO-07-815 August 2007 FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights Survey of Federal Civilian Law Highlights of GAO-07-815, a report to Enforcement Mandatory Basic Training congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Federal law enforcement officers Based on the responses of the 105 federal civilian law enforcement (LEO) are required to complete components surveyed, GAO identified 76 unique mandatory basic training mandatory basic training in order programs. Among these, four programs in particular were cited by the to exercise their law enforcement components more often than others as mandatory for their LEOs (see table). authorities. Of the remaining 72 unique basic training programs, each was common to GAO was asked to identify federal just one to three components. Some of these basic training programs are mandatory law enforcement basic required for job series classifications representing large portions of the training programs. This report overall LEO population. For example, newly hired employees at the Federal builds on GAO’s prior work Bureau of Prisons encompass 159 different job series classifications. This surveying federal civilian law large number of job series classifications is required to take the same two enforcement components regarding unique basic training programs. their functions and authorities (see GAO-07-121, December 2006). GAO defined an LEO as an individual Of the 105 components surveyed, 37 components reported exclusively using authorized to perform any of four the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC)—the largest single functions: conduct criminal provider of law enforcement training for the federal government.
    [Show full text]