DOCSLIB.ORG

Northwestern Handbook of Surgical Procedures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northwestern Handbook of Surgical Procedures V a LANDES d LANDES BIOSCIENCE BIOSCIENCE V a d e m e c u m eme cum V a d e m e c u m Table of contents (excerpt) Northwestern 1. Gastrointestinal 2. Endocrine Handbook 3. Surgical Oncology Northwestern Handbook of Sur 4. Plastic Surgery 5. Cardiothoracic Surgery of Surgical 6. Transplantation 7. Vascular Surgery Procedures gical Procedures The Vademecum series includes subjects generally not covered in other handbook series, especially many technology-driven topics that reflect the increasing influence of technology in clinical medicine. The name chosen for this comprehensive medical handbook series is Vademecum, a Latin word that roughly means “to carry along”. In the Middle Ages, traveling clerics carried pocket-sized books, excerpts of the carefully transcribed canons, known as Vademecum. In the 19th century a medical publisher in Germany, Samuel Karger, called a series of portable medical books Vademecum. The Landes Bioscience Vademecum books are intended to be used both in the training of physicians and the care of patients, by medical students, medical house Kaufman staff and practicing physicians. We hope you will find them a valuable resource. Bell ISBN 1-57059-684-0 Richard H. Bell, Jr. All titles available at Dixon B. Kaufman www.landesbioscience.com 9 781570 596841 vademecum Northwestern Handbook of Surgical Procedures Richard H. Bell, Jr., M.D. Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ilinois, U.S.A. Dixon B. Kaufman, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ilinois, U.S.A. Illustrations by Simon Kimm, M.D. L A N D E S B I O S C I E N C E GEORGETOWN, TEXAS U.S.A. VADEMECUM Northwestern Handbook of Surgical Procedures LANDES BIOSCIENCE Georgetown, Texas U.S.A. Copyright ©2005 Landes Bioscience All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any infor- mation storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the U.S.A. Please address all inquiries to the Publisher: Landes Bioscience, 810 S. Church Street, Georgetown, Texas, U.S.A. 78626 Phone: 512/ 863 7762; FAX: 512/ 863 0081 ISBN: 1-57059-684-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bell, Richard H., 1946- Northwestern handbook of surgical procedures / Richard H. Bell Jr., Dixon B. Kaufman ; illustrations by Simon Kimm. p. ; cm. -- (Vademecum) ISBN 1-57059-684-0 1. Surgery, Operative--Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Kaufman, Dixon B. II. Northwestern University (Evanston, Ill.) III. Title. IV. Title: Handbook of surgical procedures. V. Series. [DNLM: 1. Surgical Procedures, Operative--methods--Handbooks. WO 39 B435n 2005] RD37.B45 2005 617'.91--dc22 2005012436 While the authors, editors, sponsor and publisher believe that drug selection and dosage and the specifications and usage of equipment and devices, as set forth in this book, are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication, they make no warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to material described in this book. In view of the ongoing research, equipment development, changes in governmental regulations and the rapid accumulation of information relating to the biomedical sciences, the reader is urged to carefully review and evaluate the information provided herein. Dedication To today’s students of surgery, whose skills will mature to the benefit of man. Contents Preface ............................................................................................ xii Section 1: Gastrointestinal...................................................... 1 1. Esophageal Diverticulectomy: Zenker’s ............................................. 2 2. Heller Myotomy: Laparoscopic......................................................... 4 3. Thoracic Esophageal Perforation Repair ........................................... 7 4. Antireflux Procedure: Laparoscopic (Nissen)..................................... 9 5. Gastrostomy: Open ........................................................................ 11 6. Gastrectomy: Total ......................................................................... 14 7. Gastrectomy: Subtotal or Partial ..................................................... 18 8. Gastric Bypass: Roux-en-Y.............................................................. 22 9. Truncal Vagotomy and Pyloroplasty ............................................... 24 10. Highly Selective (Parietal Cell) Vagotomy ....................................... 26 11. Perforated Duodenal Ulcer Repair: Omental Patch ......................... 28 12. Major Hepatic Laceration: Open Repair ......................................... 29 13. Hepaticojejunostomy: Roux-en-Y ................................................... 34 14. Cholecystectomy with Cholangiography: Open.............................. 38 15. Cholecystectomy with Cholangiogram: Laparoscopic ..................... 41 16. Common Bile Duct Exploration: Open.......................................... 45 17. Common Bile Duct Exploration: Laparoscopic .............................. 47 18. Transduodenal Sphincteroplasty ..................................................... 50 19. Pancreatic Necrosis: Debridement .................................................. 53 20. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Whipple Procedure .............................. 55 21. Distal Pancreatectomy and Splenectomy ......................................... 60 22. Pancreatic Cystogastrostomy........................................................... 62 23. Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy: Puestow Procedure .............. 64 24. Duodenum-Preserving Subtotal Pancreatic Head Resection: Frey Procedure................................................................................ 67 25. Splenectomy: Open ........................................................................ 71 26. Splenectomy: Laparoscopic ............................................................. 73 27. Splenorrhaphy: Open ..................................................................... 76 28. Small Bowel Resection and Anastomosis (Enterectomy): Open ......... 79 29. Enterolysis for Small Bowel Obstruction: Open.............................. 82 30. Appendectomy: Open .................................................................... 84 31. Appendectomy: Laparoscopic ......................................................... 86 32. Ileostomy: Open Loop.................................................................... 88 33. Hemicolectomy (Right): Open ....................................................... 90 34. Hemicolectomy (Right): Laparoscopic ............................................ 93 35. Colostomy Closure ......................................................................... 96 36. Colostomy: End Sigmoid with Hartmann’s Pouch .......................... 98 37. Colostomy: Transverse Loop ......................................................... 101 38. Sigmoid Colectomy: Open ........................................................... 104 39. Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch: Anal Anastomosis ................... 106 40. Proctocolectomy: Total with Ileostomy ......................................... 110 41. Anal Fistulotomy .......................................................................... 113 42. Anal Fissure: Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy .............................. 116 43. Anorectal Abscess: Drainage Procedure ......................................... 118 44. Internal Hemorrhoids: Band Ligation........................................... 120 45. Inguinal Hernia Repair with Mesh: Open..................................... 122 46. Inguinal Hernia Laparoscopic Repair: Extraperitoneal Approach ... 124 47. Ventral Hernia Repair: Open ........................................................ 128 48. Ventral Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic ............................................ 130 49. Exploratory Laparotomy: Open .................................................... 133 Section 2: Endocrine........................................................... 137 50. Adrenalectomy: Laparoscopic ....................................................... 138 51. Pancreatic Endocrine Tumor Enucleation ..................................... 141 52. Parathyroid Adenoma Excision ..................................................... 144 53. Radioguided Parathyroidectomy: Minimally Invasive ................... 147 54. Thyroid Lobectomy and Total Thyroidectomy ............................. 149 55. Modified Neck Dissection ............................................................ 153 Section 3: Surgical Oncology.............................................. 157 56. Transanal Excision of Rectal Tumor .............................................. 158 57. Abdominoperineal Resection ........................................................ 160 58. Right Hepatic Lobectomy ............................................................ 163 59. Axillary Lymphadenectomy .......................................................... 166 60. Inguinal Lymphadenectomy ......................................................... 169 61. Breast Biopsy after Needle Localization ........................................ 172 62. Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy ............................ 174 63. Partial Mastectomy and Axillary Dissection .................................. 176 64. Modified Radical Mastectomy .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Laparoscopic Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis
    JOP. J Pancreas (Online) 2015 Sep 08; 16(5):438-443. REVIEW ARTICLE Laparoscopic Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis Tamotsu Kuroki, Susumu Eguchi Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan ABSTRACT function. Pancreatic ductal drainage is one of the most important factors for the management of chronic pancreatitis. A longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomyChronic pancreatitis is ischaracterized a simple and byradical severe surgical abdominal treatment pain for and pancreatic progressive ductal insufficiency drainage. However, of pancreatic in recent endocrine/exocrine years laparoscopic pancreatic procedures have developed rapidly, and reports concerning laparoscopic pancreatic resection including laparoscopic longitudinal for chronic pancreatitis compared with conventional open surgery are unclear. In this review, we note that laparoscopic longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy ishave a technically increased feasible, in number. safe and Nevertheless, effective surgical the benefits procedure of inlaparoscopic selected patients longitudinal with chronic pancreaticojejunostomy pancreatitis. INTRODUCTION Laramée et al. [22] found that surgical drainage treatment was highly cost-effective compared to endoscopic In patients with chronic pancreatitis, severe recurrent drainage treatment for patients with obstructive chronic pancreatitis. debilitatingabdominal [1–7].pain Theand elevated functional pressure endocrine/exocrine in the pancreatic Laparoscopic surgery was
    [Show full text]
  • Total Pancreatectomy-Autologous Islet Cell Transplantation (TP-AIT) for Chronic Pancreatitis – What Defines Success?
    CellR4 2015; 3 (2): e1536 Total Pancreatectomy-Autologous Islet Cell Transplantation (TP-AIT) For Chronic Pancreatitis – What Defines Success? C. S. Desai, K. M. Khan, W. X. Cui Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC, USA Corresponding Author : Wanxing Cui, MD, Ph.D; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT 30 per 100,000 in United States according to the Na - Chronic pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease tional Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney which is characterized by irreversible morpho - diseases (http://www.niddk.nih.gov). Patients with logic changes that typically causes pain and per - chronic pancreatitis suffer from debilitating pain, manent loss of the functions. The lack of good which progresses to significant narcotic medication treatment options for patients with chronic pan - requirement and deterioration in quality of life. Pa - creatitis is in part is related to any therapy need - tients can undergo multiple endoscopic and surgical ing to address the “3Ps” that are necessary for intervention procedures without significant success. this disorder.1) Pain relief, 2) Prevention of brit - In one report, pain recurs in over 50 percent of pa - tle diabetes mellitus and 3) Prevention of pan - tients after having endoscopic surgical procedures 1. creatic cancer. Total pancreatectomy and Total pancreatectomy may ameliorate the pain of autologous islet cell transplant (TP-AIT) does chronic pancreatitis however the resultant severe offer a definitive therapy while addressing these brittle diabetes makes this a less than desirable op - three; however there has not been a universal tion. Autologous islet cell transplant after total pan - uptake of this treatment to consider it the stan - createctomy (TP-AIT) gives patients with chronic dard of care due to it being considered highly in - pancreatitis the hope of pain relief and reduces the vasive and success being measured mainly by the potential for brittle diabetes.
    [Show full text]
  • Puestow Modified Procedure in the Era of Advanced
    CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 15 (2015) 85–88 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Surgery Case Reports journa l homepage: www.casereports.com “Puestow modified procedure in the era of advanced endoscopic interventions for the management of chronic lithiasic pancreatitis. A two cases report” a,∗,1 a,1 a,1 a,1 Georgios P. Fragulidis , Antonios Vezakis , Dionissios Dellaportas , Ira Sotirova , b,2 a,1 a,1 Vassilis Koutoulidis , Elliseos Kontis , Andreas Polydorou a 2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieio Hospital, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece b 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieio Hospital, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic duct calculi in chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients are the main cause of Received 23 May 2015 intractable pain which is their main symptom. Decompression options of for the main pancreatic duct Received in revised form 14 August 2015 are both surgical and advanced endoscopic procedures. Accepted 14 August 2015 PRESENTATION OF CASES: A 64-year-old male with known CP due to alcohol consumption and a 36-year- Available online 20 August 2015 old female with known idiopathic CP and pancreatic duct calculi were managed recently in our hospital where endoscopic procedures were unsuccessful. A surgical therapy was considered and a longitudinal Keywords: pancreaticojejunostomy (modified Puestow procedure) in both patients was performed with excellent Modified Puestow procedure results. Partington-Rochelle procedure DISCUSSION: Over the last 30 years, endoscopic procedures are developed to manage pancreatic duct Chronic lithiasic pancreatitis Surgical treatment strictures and calculi of the main pancreatic duct in CP patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis. Pain Control, Narcotic Use Reduction and Re-Intervention Rate. Ten Years Follow-Up Retrospective Study
    isorders c D & ti a T e h r e c r a n p a y P ISSN: 2165-7092 Pancreatic Disorders & Therapy Research Article Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis. Pain Control, Narcotic Use Reduction and Re-Intervention Rate. Ten Years Follow-Up Retrospective Study Eduardo Fernandes*, Valentina Valle, Gabriela Aguiluz Cornejo, Roberto Bustos, Roberto Mangano, Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine Chicago, IL United States ABSTRACT Introduction: Surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis is reserved to patients with intractable pain, pancreatic duct obstruction or suspicion of malignancy. Robotic surgery in this context has proven to be a safe and feasible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of robotic assisted surgery in the context of chronic pancreatitis with regards to pain control, narcotic usage and need for re-intervention. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected divisional database at the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System was carried out. The primary endpoint was: 1) Evaluation of pre and post-operative pain and narcotic usage. The secondary endpoints were: 1) 10-year overall survival; and 2) ‘Event Free Survival’ (EFS). Results: 37 patients entered the study. The procedures performed were: pancreatic head resection (7), total pancreatectomy (1), hepatico-jejunostomy (6), longitudinal Roux-en-Y pancreato-jejunostomy (4), pancreato- gastrostomy (14) and thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy (7). The mean pre and post-operative pain scores were 6.5 and 4.5 respectively (p<0.05, paired Student t-test). Rates of narcotics use pre and post-surgery were 74% and 50% of patients respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Modified Puestow Procedure in an Advanced Endoscopic Era For
    International Journal of Surgery Science 2020; 4(3): 71-76 E-ISSN: 2616-3470 P-ISSN: 2616-3462 © Surgery Science Open modified puestow procedure in an advanced www.surgeryscience.com 2020; 4(3): 71-76 endoscopic era for chronic pancreatitis with dilated Received: 06-05-2020 Accepted: 08-06-2020 pancreatic duct and stones Dr. Ajay A Gujar Department of General Surgery, Dr. Ajay A Gujar, Dr. Amrita A Gujar and Dr. Aashay Dharia Amruta Surgical and Maternity Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.33545/surgery.2020.v4.i3b.471 India Dr. Amrita A Gujar Abstract K J Somaiya Hospital and Background: Chronic pancreatitis has been defined as a continuing inflammatory disease of the pancreas Research centre, Sion, Mumbai, characterized by irreversible morphological changes. These changes typically cause pain and loss of Maharashtra, India exocrine and endocrine pancreatic function. The most common symptom of chronic pancreatitis is pain, which can be severe and intractable in some Dr. Aashay Dharia patients. Although it is itself benign, chronic pancreatitis can significantly affect quality of life and can Dharia K J Somaiya Hospital and cause significant distress with its complications [1]. Research centre, Sion, Mumbai, The initial treatment for pain in most cases is to start of enzyme replacement, control of diabetes with Maharashtra, India insulin, and administration of oral analgesics. Surgical intervention is required in patients with intractable pain that is resistant to conventional nonsurgical therapy, in patients with associated or suspected malignancy, and in patients who have developed complications such as biliary or duodenal obstruction, pancreatic fistulae, pancreatic [2] ascites/pleural effusion, pseudocyst, or rare hemosuccus pancreaticus .
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Surgical Treatment for Chronic Pancreatitis: Past, Present, and Future
    Hindawi Gastroenterology Research and Practice Volume 2017, Article ID 8418372, 6 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8418372 Review Article Surgical Treatment for Chronic Pancreatitis: Past, Present, and Future Stephanie Plagemann, Maria Welte, Jakob R. Izbicki, and Kai Bachmann Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany Correspondence should be addressed to Stephanie Plagemann; [email protected] Received 14 March 2017; Revised 2 July 2017; Accepted 5 July 2017; Published 27 July 2017 Academic Editor: Riccardo Casadei Copyright © 2017 Stephanie Plagemann et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The pancreas was one of the last explored organs in the human body. The first surgical experiences were made before fully understanding the function of the gland. Surgical procedures remained less successful until the discovery of insulin, blood groups, and finally the possibility of blood donation. Throughout the centuries, the surgical approach went from radical resections to minimal resections or only drainage of the gland in comparison to an adequate resection combined with drainage procedures. Today, the well-known and standardized procedures are considered as safe due to the high experience of operating surgeons, the centering of pancreatic surgery in specialized centers, and optimized perioperative treatment. Although surgical procedures have become safer and more efficient than ever, the overall perioperative morbidity after pancreatic surgery remains high and management of postoperative complications stagnates. Current research focuses on the prevention of complications, optimizing the patient’s general condition preoperatively and finding the appropriate timing for surgical treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Laparoscopic Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis; a Single Operator Tertiary Center Experience from Western India
    Research Article Clinics in Surgery Published: 28 Jan, 2019 Laparoscopic Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis; a Single Operator Tertiary Center Experience from Western India Rege SA*, Kulkarni GV, Surpam Shrinivas, Amiteshwar Singh and Chiranjeev R Department of General Surgery, King Edward Memorial Hospital, India Abstract Introduction: Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy (LPJ), has its recognized applications in the decompressive management of Chronic Pancreatitis (CP), and is recommended in patients with concomitant pain, obstructed, dilated pancreatic duct. Performing this procedure laparoscopically is technically challenging. We describe our technique and report our series of 33 patients who underwent this procedure. Methods: Between March 2013 and June 2018, 33 patients (19 males, 14 females) hailing from 5 different states in India, with an established diagnosis of CP underwent laparoscopic LPJ by a single surgeon in a tertiary care center in Western India. The median age and pancreatic duct diameter on CT were 41.8 (22 to 54) years and 8.73 (7 to 10) mm, respectively. Results: Thirty two patients were included in the final analysis in which the procedure was completed laparoscopically while one surgery necessitated conversion to open, owing to hemorrhage from the gastroduodenal artery. Median operating time was 131.2 (104 to 163) minutes and intraoperative blood loss of approximately 100 mL. There were no peri-operative deaths and no mortality at the six month follow up. No peri-operative blood transfusion was required, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 5.25 (5 to 8) days. Two patients required readmission at 8 months for pain. Twenty four patients reported to be nearly pain free on follow up while remaining 8 patients were managed OPEN ACCESS with appropriate analgesia without further procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • SOMC Surgical Lecture Series 1St Edition
    SOMC Surgical Lecture Series 1st Edition Thomas L. Khoury, MD FACS, RPVI, RVT, Professor of Surgery and Master Faculty OUHCOM Lecture Chapters Chapter 1: Care of the Surgical Patient Chapter 2: Care of the Angiography Patient Chapter 2: Nursing Symposium Care of the Surgical Patient Chapter 3: Fluids and Electrolytes Chapter 5: Surgical Critical Care Chapter 6: Wound Care Center Chapter 7: Cancer Screening Symposium Chapter 7: Cutaneous Neoplasms Chapter 8: Breast Diseases Chapter 9: Endocrine Surgery Chapter 9: The Pancreas Chapter 10: The Esophagus Chapter 11: The Stomach Chapter 12: Small Bowel Chapter 13: Liver and Biliary Tree Chapter 14: The Colon Chapter 15: Lung Cancer Surgery Chapter 16: Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Chapter 16: Carotid Stenting Chapter 16: Dialysis Access Evaluation Chapter 16: Minimally Invasive Vascular Interventions Chapter 16: Vascular Surgery Chapter 18: Arterial Aneurysm Disease: Natural History, Chapter 18: Critical Limb Ischemia Chapter 20: DVT Treatment Chapter 20: Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia Chapter 20: Iliofemoral DVT Chapter 20: Thrombolytic Therapy in the Management of Deep Venous Thrombosis Chapter 20: Venous Disease Grand Rounds Chapter 20: Venous Disease Ground Rounds Chapter 21: Thrombolytic Therapy for Significant Pulmonary Embolic Chapter 1: Care of the Surgical Patient > Over 70 > Overall Physical status Assessment of Operative Risk > Elective v/s Emergency > Physiologic Extent of Age Procedure > Number of Associated Illnesses > Psychological frank but optimistic Preparation of Patient
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Pancreatitis: Introduction
    Chronic Pancreatitis: Introduction Authors: Anthony N. Kalloo, MD; Lynn Norwitz, BS; Charles J. Yeo, MD Chronic pancreatitis is a relatively rare disorder occurring in about 20 per 100,000 population. The disease is progressive with persistent inflammation leading to damage and/or destruction of the pancreas . Endocrine and exocrine functional impairment results from the irreversible pancreatic injury. The pancreas is located deep in the retroperitoneal space of the upper part of the abdomen (Figure 1). It is almost completely covered by the stomach and duodenum . This elongated gland (12–20 cm in the adult) has a lobe-like structure. Variation in shape and exact body location is common. In most people, the larger part of the gland's head is located to the right of the spine or directly over the spinal column and extends to the spleen . The pancreas has both exocrine and endocrine functions. In its exocrine capacity, the acinar cells produce digestive juices, which are secreted into the intestine and are essential in the breakdown and metabolism of proteins, fats and carbohydrates. In its endocrine function capacity, the pancreas also produces insulin and glucagon , which are secreted into the blood to regulate glucose levels. Figure 1. Location of the pancreas in the body. What is Chronic Pancreatitis? Chronic pancreatitis is characterized by inflammatory changes of the pancreas involving some or all of the following: fibrosis, calcification, pancreatic ductal inflammation, and pancreatic stone formation (Figure 2). Although autopsies indicate that there is a 0.5–5% incidence of pancreatitis, the true prevalence is unknown. In recent years, there have been several attempts to classify chronic pancreatitis, but these have met with difficulty for several reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • AHPBA 2019 Annual Meeting | Eposter Abstracts Friday, March 22, 2019 & Saturday, March 23, 2019
    AHPBA 2019 Annual Meeting | ePoster Abstracts Friday, March 22, 2019 & Saturday, March 23, 2019 | ePoster Display Only, Kiosk #4 P 73. TRAVEL DISTANCE IS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED SURVIVAL IN HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA C Hester, N Rich, M Augustine, J Mansour, M Porembka, S Wang, H Zeh III, A Singal, A Yopp Presenter: Caitlin Hester MD | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Background: An association between travel distance and survival measures has been been demonstrated across gastrointestinal malignancies but thus far has not been examined in patients newly diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine the association of travel distance with time to treatment (TTT) and overall survival (OS) in patients newly diagnosed with HCC. Methods: Newly diagnosed HCC patients who received treatment were identified in the Texas Cancer Registry from 2004 to 2015. We compared system- and patient-level factors among patients who traveled short (<12.5 miles), intermediate (12.5-49.9 miles), and long (≥50 miles) travel distances for initial treatment. Anova and Chi-square analyses were used to compare clinicopathologic variables, and Kaplan-Meier with log rank and cox regression models were used to compare survival. Results: 4,329 patients were identified: 2,136 (49.3%) short, 1,380 (31.9%) intermediate, and 813 (18.9%) long distance patients. Patients who traveled intermediate and long distances were more likely to be Non- Hispanic White (59% for intermediate and 60% for long vs 33% for short, p<0.001) and a higher proportion of privately insured patients (29% for intermediate and 24% for long vs 16% for short,p<0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Classic Diseases Revisited Chronic Pancreatitis
    Postgrad Med J 1996; 72: 327 - 333 (© The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine, 1996 Classic diseases revisited Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.72.848.327 on 1 June 1996. Downloaded from Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis and treatment Summary Three-dimensional magnetic reson- ance cholangiopancreatography is Sandeep Sidhu, Rakesh K Tandon currently the most exciting new ima- ging technique for chronic pancrea- titis. Endoscopy-assisted duodenal intubation during the secretin-cho- Chronic pancreatitis is prevalent in most parts of the world although its lecystokinin test reduces intubation aetiology and clinical course may vary in different regions. Community-based time in difficult cases. The NBT- field studies from our centre have revealed that tropical chronic pancreatitis in para-amino benzoic acid test has Southern India is a mild disease with onset of symptoms in early adulthood,' been refined to enhance its discri- and a prevalence of 1:793 in endemic areas. The predominant symptoms are minant power. The cholesteryl- abdominal pain (30.6%), diabetes mellitus (52.8%) and malabsorption [C13]octanoate breath test and the (16.7%).' On the other hand, patients presenting to office practice,2 or to local faecal elastase test are newer highly or tertiary care hospitals3 have severe chronic pancreatitis, with abdominal pain sensitive and specific tubeless tests. as the predominant symptom (approximately 80%); exocrine pancreatic Pain in chronic pancreatitis con- insufficiency and calcification are seen in 80 - 90% patients.2 In a recent tinues to be a vexing therapeutic study,3 surgical treatment for pain was required in 53.9% of chronic pancreatitis issue. Enzyme treatment continues patients referred to the All India Institute ofMedical Sciences, a leading tertiary despite criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Pancreatectomy with Autologous Islet Cell Transplantation—The Current Indications
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Total Pancreatectomy with Autologous Islet Cell Transplantation—The Current Indications Beata Jabło ´nska* and Sławomir Mrowiec Department of Digestive Tract Surgery, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel./Fax: +48-32-7894251 Abstract: Total pancreatectomy is a major complex surgical procedure involving removal of the whole pancreatic parenchyma and duodenum. It leads to lifelong pancreatic exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. The control of surgery-induced diabetes (type 3) requires insulin therapy. Total pancreatectomy with autologous islet transplantation (TPAIT) is performed in order to prevent postoperative diabetes and its serious complications. It is very important whether it is safe and beneficial for patients in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term results including quality of life. Small duct painful chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a primary indication for TPAIT, but currently the indications for this procedure have been extended. They also include hereditary/genetic pancreatitis (HGP), as well as less frequent indications such as benign/borderline pancreatic tumors (intraductal papillary neoplasms, neuroendocrine neoplasms) and “high-risk pancreatic stump”. The use of TPAIT in malignant pancreatic and peripancreatic neoplasms has been reported in the worldwide literature but currently is not a standard but rather a controversial management in these patients. In this review, history, technique, indications, and contraindications, as well as short-term and long-term results of TPAIT, including pediatric patients, are described. Citation: Jabło´nska,B.; Mrowiec, S. Total Pancreatectomy with Keywords: total pancreatectomy; islet transplantation; autotransplantation Autologous Islet Cell Transplantation—The Current Indications.
    [Show full text]