DOCSLIB.ORG

Differentiating Surgical Instruments Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FREE DIFFERENTIATING SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS PDF Colleen J Rutherford | 195 pages | 30 Nov 2011 | F.A. Davis Company | 9780803625457 | English | Pennsylvania, United States Sleeve gastrectomy - Wikipedia The result is a sleeve or tube like structure. The procedure permanently reduces the size of the stomach, although there could be some dilatation of the stomach later on in life. The procedure is generally performed laparoscopically and is irreversible. Differentiating Surgical Instruments gastrectomy was originally performed as a modification to another bariatric procedure, the duodenal switchand then later as the first part of a two-stage gastric bypass operation on extremely obese patients for whom the risk of performing gastric bypass surgery was deemed too large. The initial weight loss in these patients was so successful it began to be investigated as a stand-alone procedure. Sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed bariatric surgery worldwide. This weight-loss independent benefit is related to the decrease in gastric volume, changes in gut peptides, and expression of genes involved in glucose absorption. Most Differentiating Surgical Instruments prefer to use a bougie between 36 and 40 Fr with the procedure and the ideal approximate remaining size of the stomach after the procedure is about mL. Endorsed by the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders [8] and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Differentiating Surgical InstrumentsDifferentiating Surgical Instruments sleeve gastrectomy is gaining popularity in children and adolescents. Studies by Alqahtani and colleagues have found that sleeve gastrectomy causes large weight loss in children and adolescents aged 5 to 21 years. Another side effect is insomnia. After this surgery many people can only sleep when Differentiating Surgical Instruments take melatonin or sleeping medications. Sleeve gastrectomy may cause complications; some of them are listed below: [14]. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Sleeve gastrectomy Diagram of a gastric sleeve. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be Differentiating Surgical Instruments and removed. Retrieved Part A. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Canadian Journal of Surgery. Annals of Surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. Psychology Today. Mexico Bariatric Center. Retrieved 19 October Gastric Sleeve Diet Guide. Retrieved 16 March Retrieved 5 August Pitombo C Obesity surgery: principles and practice. McGraw Hill Professional. Tests and procedures involving the digestive system. Digestive system surgery. Endoscopy Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Barium swallow Upper gastrointestinal series. Bariatric surgery Duodenal switch Jejunoileal bypass Bowel resection Ileostomy Intestine transplantation Jejunostomy Partial ileal bypass surgery Strictureplasty. Appendectomy Colectomy Colonic polypectomy Colostomy Hartmann's operation. Differentiating Surgical Instruments resection Lower anterior resection Total mesorectal excision. Anal sphincterotomy Anorectal manometry Lateral internal sphincterotomy Rubber band ligation Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. Endoscopy : Colonoscopy Anoscopy Capsule endoscopy Enteroscopy Proctoscopy Sigmoidoscopy Abdominal ultrasonography Defecography Double-contrast barium enema Endoanal ultrasound Enteroclysis Lower gastrointestinal series Small-bowel follow-through Transrectal ultrasonography Differentiating Surgical Instruments colonoscopy. Fecal fat test Fecal pH Differentiating Surgical Instruments Stool guaiac test. Artificial extracorporeal liver support Bioartificial liver devices Liver dialysis Hepatectomy Liver biopsy Liver transplantation Portal hypertension Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [TIPS] Distal splenorenal shunt procedure. Frey's procedure Pancreas transplantation Pancreatectomy Pancreaticoduodenectomy Puestow procedure. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage Intraperitoneal injection Laparoscopy Omentopexy Paracentesis Peritoneal dialysis. Hernia repair Inguinal hernia surgery Femoral hernia repair. Categories : Surgical Differentiating Surgical Instruments procedures Bariatrics Obesity Digestive system procedures. Hidden categories: CS1 Persian-language sources fa Articles needing additional references from February All articles needing additional references Commons category link from Wikidata. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Differentiating Surgical Instruments Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version. Wikimedia Commons. Diagram of a gastric sleeve. Small bowel Bariatric surgery Duodenal switch Jejunoileal bypass Bowel resection Ileostomy Intestine transplantation Jejunostomy Partial ileal bypass surgery Strictureplasty. Liver Artificial extracorporeal liver support Bioartificial liver devices Liver dialysis Hepatectomy Liver biopsy Liver transplantation Portal hypertension Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt [TIPS] Distal Differentiating Surgical Instruments shunt procedure. Peritoneum Diagnostic peritoneal lavage Intraperitoneal injection Laparoscopy Omentopexy Paracentesis Peritoneal dialysis. Robotic Surgery: Risks vs. Rewards | PSNet A year-old man was seen by a urologist for difficulty urinating and diagnosed by biopsy with localized prostate cancer. The urologist recommended a radical prostatectomy removal of the prostate. The urologist stated that the best and safest way to remove the prostate was with a minimally invasive robotic surgery. The robotic surgery, he explained, Differentiating Surgical Instruments involve a few small incisions, performed by a surgeon seated at a computer console in the operating room. The procedure would be carried out using robotic arms and surgical instruments. The urologist went on to say that the robotic technology would allow for smaller incisions, better control of the instruments, lower risk of complications, and faster return Differentiating Surgical Instruments erectile function. During the procedure, there were mechanical problems as the robotic arms were not responding as expected. The urologist persisted in using the robotic Differentiating Surgical Instruments and ultimately was able to complete the procedure. The operation took twice as long as expected, but the urologist felt it had been successful. Postoperatively, the patient developed serious bleeding requiring multiple blood transfusions. He was taken back to the operating room where it was noted the inferior epigastric artery a key artery in the pelvis had been damaged during the original procedure. The injury was repaired but this second operation was prolonged and complicated due to the degree of bleeding. The patient ultimately required several additional surgeries and a prolonged hospital stay. The use of robotic assistance in surgery has expanded exponentially since it was first approved in RAS is a derivative of standard laparoscopic surgery and was developed to overcome the limitations of standard Differentiating Surgical Instruments. Like traditional laparoscopy, RAS uses small incisions and insufflation of the anatomical operative Differentiating Surgical Instruments with carbon dioxide. Differentiating Surgical Instruments robotic camera and various instruments are placed through the ports into the body and can be manipulated by the surgeon performing the operation. In the case of RAS, though, the surgeon, seated at a computer console in the operating room, uses robot assistance to utilize the tools instead of doing it himself or herself directly at the bedside. In RAS, a bedside assistant exchanges the instruments and performs manual tasks like retraction and suction. The da Vinci robotic surgical system, made by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. There are three major components of the system including:. In theory, RAS marries the benefits of laparoscopic surgery with that of open techniques by combining a minimally invasive approach with the additional benefit of a three-dimensional, magnified image. In addition, RAS offers improved ergonomics and dexterity compared to traditional laparoscopy, and these advantages may Differentiating Surgical Instruments to a shorter learning curve for surgeons. The purported benefits of RAS also include smaller incisions, decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stays, faster return to work, improved cosmesis, and lower incidence of some surgical complications. While we appreciate these advantages of RAS, most of these benefits are short term and limited to the acute perioperative period. In fact, there is little evidence demonstrating that robotic surgery Differentiating Surgical Instruments any long-term benefits over open techniques. In addition, the rates of some complications—deep vein thrombosis, wound infections, lymphoceles and hematomas, anastomotic leaks, and ureteral injuries—appear to Differentiating Surgical Instruments slightly lower than with open approaches. When compared to standard laparoscopic Differentiating Surgical Instruments, robotic assistance has been shown to have decreased blood loss, lower rates of blood transfusion, and slightly shorter hospital stays. Interestingly, the proponents of RALP frequently boast improved urinary continence and sexual function after surgery or at least equivalent rates when compared to open prostatectomy. The data has generally been equivocal in this area; standardized, comparable, long-term data are lacking. Their results supported
Recommended publications
  • Laparoscopic Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis

    Laparoscopic Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis

    JOP. J Pancreas (Online) 2015 Sep 08; 16(5):438-443. REVIEW ARTICLE Laparoscopic Longitudinal Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis Tamotsu Kuroki, Susumu Eguchi Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan ABSTRACT function. Pancreatic ductal drainage is one of the most important factors for the management of chronic pancreatitis. A longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomyChronic pancreatitis is ischaracterized a simple and byradical severe surgical abdominal treatment pain for and pancreatic progressive ductal insufficiency drainage. However, of pancreatic in recent endocrine/exocrine years laparoscopic pancreatic procedures have developed rapidly, and reports concerning laparoscopic pancreatic resection including laparoscopic longitudinal for chronic pancreatitis compared with conventional open surgery are unclear. In this review, we note that laparoscopic longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy ishave a technically increased feasible, in number. safe and Nevertheless, effective surgical the benefits procedure of inlaparoscopic selected patients longitudinal with chronic pancreaticojejunostomy pancreatitis. INTRODUCTION Laramée et al. [22] found that surgical drainage treatment was highly cost-effective compared to endoscopic In patients with chronic pancreatitis, severe recurrent drainage treatment for patients with obstructive chronic pancreatitis. debilitatingabdominal [1–7].pain Theand elevated functional pressure endocrine/exocrine in the pancreatic Laparoscopic surgery was
  • Primary Epiploic Appendagitis☆

    Primary Epiploic Appendagitis☆

    J COLOPROCTOL. 2013;33(3):161–166 Journal of Coloproctology www.jcol.org.br Case report Primary epiploic appendagitis☆ Carlos Augusto Real Martineza,*, Rogério Tadeu Palmab, Paulo Pedroso Silveira Júnior c, Daniela Tiemi Satoc, Murilo Rocha Rodriguesc, Hermínio Cabral de Resende Júniorb, René Crepaldi Filhod,e a Graduate Program in Health Sciences of Universidade São Francisco (USF), Bragança Paulista, SP, Brazil b Discipline of Digestive System Surgery of Faculdade de Medicina da Fundação ABC (FUABC), Santo André, SP, Brazil c School of Medicine, USF, Bragança Paulista, SP, Brazil d Discipline of Digestive System Surgery of Faculdade de Medicina da Fundação ABC (FUABC), Santo André, SP, Brazil e Discipline of Digestive System Surgery of Universidade Nove de Julho (UNIVOVE), São Paulo, SP, Brazil article info abstract Article history: Primary epiploic appendagitis (PEA) is a seldom reported disease caused by spontaneous Received 2 February 2013 torsion of one or more epiploic appendices. The aim of this study is to describe two cases Accepted 15 March 2013 of PEA reviewing the main aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of disease. Case report: Case 1) Male patient, 55 years old, obese, with abdominal right iliac fossa (RIF) pain for two Keywords: days. Abdominal examination showed pain on palpation in the RIF with rebound tenderness. Appendicitis Abdominal computed tomography identifi ed lobulated lesion in the cecum, measuring 4.5 Cecal diseases cm in diameter, which was suggestive of PEA or early neoplasm of the colon wall. The lapa- Infl ammation roscopic assessment confi rmed the diagnosis of PEA and the appendix was removed. The pa- Colon tient had a satisfactory outcome, being discharged on the second postoperative day.
  • 16. Questions and Answers

    16. Questions and Answers

    16. Questions and Answers 1. Which of the following is not associated with esophageal webs? A. Plummer-Vinson syndrome B. Epidermolysis bullosa C. Lupus D. Psoriasis E. Stevens-Johnson syndrome 2. An 11 year old boy complains that occasionally a bite of hotdog “gives mild pressing pain in his chest” and that “it takes a while before he can take another bite.” If it happens again, he discards the hotdog but sometimes he can finish it. The most helpful diagnostic information would come from A. Family history of Schatzki rings B. Eosinophil counts C. UGI D. Time-phased MRI E. Technetium 99 salivagram 3. 12 year old boy previously healthy with one-month history of difficulty swallowing both solid and liquids. He sometimes complains food is getting stuck in his retrosternal area after swallowing. His weight decreased approximately 5% from last year. He denies vomiting, choking, gagging, drooling, pain during swallowing or retrosternal pain. His physical examination is normal. What would be the appropriate next investigation to perform in this patient? A. Upper Endoscopy B. Upper GI contrast study C. Esophageal manometry D. Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) E. Direct laryngoscopy 4. A 12 year old male presents to the ER after a recent episode of emesis. The parents are concerned because undigested food 3 days old was in his vomit. He admits to a sensation of food and liquids “sticking” in his chest for the past 4 months, as he points to the upper middle chest. Parents relate a 10 lb (4.5 Kg) weight loss over the past 3 months.
  • Total Pancreatectomy-Autologous Islet Cell Transplantation (TP-AIT) for Chronic Pancreatitis – What Defines Success?

    Total Pancreatectomy-Autologous Islet Cell Transplantation (TP-AIT) for Chronic Pancreatitis – What Defines Success?

    CellR4 2015; 3 (2): e1536 Total Pancreatectomy-Autologous Islet Cell Transplantation (TP-AIT) For Chronic Pancreatitis – What Defines Success? C. S. Desai, K. M. Khan, W. X. Cui Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC, USA Corresponding Author : Wanxing Cui, MD, Ph.D; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT 30 per 100,000 in United States according to the Na - Chronic pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease tional Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney which is characterized by irreversible morpho - diseases (http://www.niddk.nih.gov). Patients with logic changes that typically causes pain and per - chronic pancreatitis suffer from debilitating pain, manent loss of the functions. The lack of good which progresses to significant narcotic medication treatment options for patients with chronic pan - requirement and deterioration in quality of life. Pa - creatitis is in part is related to any therapy need - tients can undergo multiple endoscopic and surgical ing to address the “3Ps” that are necessary for intervention procedures without significant success. this disorder.1) Pain relief, 2) Prevention of brit - In one report, pain recurs in over 50 percent of pa - tle diabetes mellitus and 3) Prevention of pan - tients after having endoscopic surgical procedures 1. creatic cancer. Total pancreatectomy and Total pancreatectomy may ameliorate the pain of autologous islet cell transplant (TP-AIT) does chronic pancreatitis however the resultant severe offer a definitive therapy while addressing these brittle diabetes makes this a less than desirable op - three; however there has not been a universal tion. Autologous islet cell transplant after total pan - uptake of this treatment to consider it the stan - createctomy (TP-AIT) gives patients with chronic dard of care due to it being considered highly in - pancreatitis the hope of pain relief and reduces the vasive and success being measured mainly by the potential for brittle diabetes.
  • Chronic Pancreatitis: What the Clinician Want to Know from Mri

    Chronic Pancreatitis: What the Clinician Want to Know from Mri

    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Magn Reson Manuscript Author Imaging Clin Manuscript Author N Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 August 01. Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018 August ; 26(3): 451–461. doi:10.1016/j.mric.2018.03.012. CHRONIC PANCREATITIS: WHAT THE CLINICIAN WANT TO KNOW FROM MRI TEMEL TIRKES, M.D. Department of Radiology and Clinical Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA Keywords Pancreas; Chronic Pancreatitis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography; Computerized Tomography INTRODUCTION Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a low prevalence disease.1–3 In 2006, there were approximately 50 cases of definite CP per 100,000 population in Olmsted County, MN 3, translating to a total of 150,000–200,000 cases in the US population. Clinical features of CP are highly variable and include minimal, or no symptoms of debilitating pain repeated episodes of acute pancreatitis, pancreatic exocrine and endocrine insufficiency and pancreatic cancer. CP profoundly affects the quality of life, which can be worse than other chronic conditions and cancers.4 Natural history studies for CP originated mainly from centers outside the U.S.5−910,11 conducted during the 1960–1990’s and consisted primarily of males with alcoholic CP. Only one large retrospective longitudinal cohort study has been conducted in the US for patients seen at the Mayo Clinic from 1976–1982.12 While these data provide general insights into disease evolution, it is difficult to predict the probability of outcomes or disease progression in individual patients.
  • Multimodal Analgesia for Colorectal Surgery: a Retrospective Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol

    Multimodal Analgesia for Colorectal Surgery: a Retrospective Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol

    10/10/2020 Multimodal Analgesia for Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol Andrew Candelore, DNP, CRNA Andrea Mazzei, DNP, CRNA Robert Wolfrom, DNP, CRNA 1 Introduction and Background Traditional Colorectal Surgery Laparoscopic Surgery ● Large abdominal incisions • Reduced complications ● High rates of adverse • Significantly shortened LOS outcomes • Decreased readmission rates ○ PONV ○ Increased pain Continued Challenges ○ Decreased mobility • Opioids used as primary ○ Delayed gastric motility analgesic modality ○ Urinary dysfunction • Troublesome side effects: ○ 78% increase in LOS • PONV, respiratory depression, ○ Readmission rates as high sedation, constipation, as 35.4% addiction 2 1 10/10/2020 Significance • The Opioid Epidemic • 99% of adult surgical patients receive an opioid • 6-10% of opioid-naïve patients have continued dependence • 14.4% of colorectal surgical patients report chronic use pattern postoperatively • Anesthetic Pain Management • Aim to limit opioids • Adopt alternative approaches • Provide effective analgesia while promoting optimal patient outcomes 3 Purpose and Objectives • Project Purpose Evaluate the perioperative care improvement initiative implemented at Christiana Care by the Department of Anesthesia which aimed to improve the quality of recovery from colorectal surgery through the utilization of multimodal analgesia. • Determine if multimodal analgesia, as compared to traditional anesthesia care, reduced: • Pain scores • Opioid consumption • PONV • Hospital LOS
  • Puestow Modified Procedure in the Era of Advanced

    Puestow Modified Procedure in the Era of Advanced

    CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 15 (2015) 85–88 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Surgery Case Reports journa l homepage: www.casereports.com “Puestow modified procedure in the era of advanced endoscopic interventions for the management of chronic lithiasic pancreatitis. A two cases report” a,∗,1 a,1 a,1 a,1 Georgios P. Fragulidis , Antonios Vezakis , Dionissios Dellaportas , Ira Sotirova , b,2 a,1 a,1 Vassilis Koutoulidis , Elliseos Kontis , Andreas Polydorou a 2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieio Hospital, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece b 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieio Hospital, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic duct calculi in chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients are the main cause of Received 23 May 2015 intractable pain which is their main symptom. Decompression options of for the main pancreatic duct Received in revised form 14 August 2015 are both surgical and advanced endoscopic procedures. Accepted 14 August 2015 PRESENTATION OF CASES: A 64-year-old male with known CP due to alcohol consumption and a 36-year- Available online 20 August 2015 old female with known idiopathic CP and pancreatic duct calculi were managed recently in our hospital where endoscopic procedures were unsuccessful. A surgical therapy was considered and a longitudinal Keywords: pancreaticojejunostomy (modified Puestow procedure) in both patients was performed with excellent Modified Puestow procedure results. Partington-Rochelle procedure DISCUSSION: Over the last 30 years, endoscopic procedures are developed to manage pancreatic duct Chronic lithiasic pancreatitis Surgical treatment strictures and calculi of the main pancreatic duct in CP patients.
  • Navigating Home Care: Parenteral Nutrition—Part Two

    Navigating Home Care: Parenteral Nutrition—Part Two

    NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #11 Series Editor: Carol Rees Parrish, M.S., R.D., CNSD Navigating Home Care: Parenteral Nutrition—Part Two by Gisela Barnadas Parenteral nutrition (PN) is often used for patients who are unable to absorb suffi- cient nutrition through the gastrointestinal tract. PN can be safely administered in the home setting with proper assessment and monitoring of the patient. An interdiscipli- nary team approach is used to identify and avoid potential complications, which may occur. This article provides the physician with specific guidelines for evaluating, ordering and monitoring PN therapy in the home patient. It also addresses financial and reimbursement considerations with emphasis on understanding the often con- fusing, Medicare guidelines. CASE 1 • What resources are available to help manage this JR is a 65-year-old female with vascular disease, patient in the home? hypertension, diabetes and history of a hysterectomy. • What resources are there available for the patient? She presents with severe abdominal pain, vomiting and • Will insurance pay for this? diarrhea. A small bowel series documents a bowel obstruction, most likely due to bowel ischemia. Find- Providing total parenteral nutrition in the home ings during surgical intervention included: twisted, (HPN) is by no means a new treatment option. The gangrenous small bowel with multiple adhesions first record of a patient receiving HPN was a 36-year- resulting in resection of her distal jejunum, ileum and old woman with extensive metastatic ovarian carci- right colon, leaving an intact duodenum, approximately noma in 1968.(1) While the exact number of people 100 cm of the jejunum and most of her left colon.
  • 600 Technology (Applied Sciences)

    600 Technology (Applied Sciences)

    600 600 Technology (Applied sciences) Class here inventions See also 303.48 for technology as a cause of cultural change; also 306.4 for sociology of technology; also 338.1–338.4 for economic aspects of industries based on specific technologies; also 338.9 for technology transfer, appropriate technology See Manual at 300 vs. 600; also at 363 vs. 302–307, 333.7, 570–590, 600; also at 363.1 vs. 600; also at 583–585 vs. 600 SUMMARY 601–609 Standard subdivisions and technical drawing, hazardous materials technology, patents 610 Medicine and health 620 Engineering and allied operations 630 Agriculture and related technologies 640 Home and family management 650 Management and auxiliary services 660 Chemical engineering and related technologies 670 Manufacturing 680 Manufacture of products for specific uses 690 Construction of buildings 601 Philosophy and theory 602 Miscellany Do not use for patents; class in 608 Class interdisciplinary works on trademarks and service marks in 929.9 Interdisciplinary collections of standards relocated to 389 .9 Commercial miscellany Class commercial miscellany of products and services used in individual and family living in 640.29; class commercial miscellany of manufactured products in 670.29; class interdisciplinary commercial miscellany in 381.029 603 Dictionaries, encyclopedias, concordances 604 Technical drawing, hazardous materials technology; groups of people 657 604 Dewey Decimal Classification 604 .2 Technical drawing Including arrangement and organization of drafting rooms, preservation and storage of drawings; specific drafting procedures and conventions (e.g., production illustration, dimensioning; lettering, titling; shades, shadows, projections); preparation and reading of copies Class here engineering graphics, mechanical drawing For architectural drawing, see 720.28.
  • Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis. Pain Control, Narcotic Use Reduction and Re-Intervention Rate. Ten Years Follow-Up Retrospective Study

    Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis. Pain Control, Narcotic Use Reduction and Re-Intervention Rate. Ten Years Follow-Up Retrospective Study

    isorders c D & ti a T e h r e c r a n p a y P ISSN: 2165-7092 Pancreatic Disorders & Therapy Research Article Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis. Pain Control, Narcotic Use Reduction and Re-Intervention Rate. Ten Years Follow-Up Retrospective Study Eduardo Fernandes*, Valentina Valle, Gabriela Aguiluz Cornejo, Roberto Bustos, Roberto Mangano, Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine Chicago, IL United States ABSTRACT Introduction: Surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis is reserved to patients with intractable pain, pancreatic duct obstruction or suspicion of malignancy. Robotic surgery in this context has proven to be a safe and feasible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of robotic assisted surgery in the context of chronic pancreatitis with regards to pain control, narcotic usage and need for re-intervention. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected divisional database at the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System was carried out. The primary endpoint was: 1) Evaluation of pre and post-operative pain and narcotic usage. The secondary endpoints were: 1) 10-year overall survival; and 2) ‘Event Free Survival’ (EFS). Results: 37 patients entered the study. The procedures performed were: pancreatic head resection (7), total pancreatectomy (1), hepatico-jejunostomy (6), longitudinal Roux-en-Y pancreato-jejunostomy (4), pancreato- gastrostomy (14) and thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy (7). The mean pre and post-operative pain scores were 6.5 and 4.5 respectively (p<0.05, paired Student t-test). Rates of narcotics use pre and post-surgery were 74% and 50% of patients respectively.
  • The Impact of Star Physicians on Diffusion

    The Impact of Star Physicians on Diffusion

    THE IMPACT OF STAR PHYSICIANS ON DIFFUSION OF A MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY A Dissertation Submitted to The Temple University Graduate Board in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Laura Shinn January, 2011 Examining Committee Members: Erwin A. Blackstone, PhD, Advisory Chair, Economics Joseph P. Fuhr, Jr., PhD, Economics Thomas E. Getzen, PhD, Risk, Insurance and Healthcare Management Paul N. Rappoport, PhD, Economics Albert I.Wertheimer, PhD, MBA, External Member, Pharmaco-Economics ii ABSTRACT The Impact of Star Physicians on Diffusion of a Medical Technology Laura Shinn Temple University January, 2011 Professor Erwin A. Blackstone, Chair This dissertation studies the effect of star power among physicians on the diffusion of a medical technology. Studies of the diffusion of medical technologies document institutional and market level factors influencing diffusion rates and patterns. The role of the physician in the diffusion of medical technology in hospitals is not widely studied. This dissertation seeks to fill this gap. Certain ―star‖ physicians and hospitals are recognized as highly attractive to patients. A star physician is defined as a physician who meets any of the following criteria: (i) completed residency training at top 30 ranked hospital, (ii) graduated from a top 30 medical school or (iii) is included in Castle & Connolly’s Top Docs publications. A star hospital is defined as a member of the American Association of Medical Colleges’ Council of Teaching Hospitals. iii Using quarterly data on all bariatric surgeries performed in the state of Pennsylvania from 1995 through 2007, I measure the effect of stars physicians and star hospitals on the diffusion of a surgical innovation in bariatric surgery called laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.
  • Coloduodenal Fistula in Right Colorectal Cancer: Case Report and Review of the Literature

    Coloduodenal Fistula in Right Colorectal Cancer: Case Report and Review of the Literature

    Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences Received 5 Dec 2020 | Accepted 12 Jan 2021 | Published Online 16 Jan 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15520/jmrhs.v4i1.303 JMRHS 4 (1), 1135−1138 (2020) ISSN (O) 2589-9031 | (P) 2589-9023 CASE REPORTS Coloduodenal Fistula in Right Colorectal Cancer: Case Report and Review of the Literature ∗ Patricia Ciriano Hernández 1 Carlos Martínez Pinedo Rafael Picón Rodríguez Elisa Jiménez Higuera Daniel Sánchez Peláez Ángel Fernández Camuñas Jesús Martín Fernández 1General and Digestive System Abstract Surgery Hospital General In spite of the high incidence of colorectal cancer, cases of right colon Universitario de Ciudad Real Calle Obispo Rafael Torija 13005 cancer presenting with local invasion are not common. This is even Ciudad Real, Castilla la Mancha, more infrequent if we focus on duodenal invasion and presence of Spain duodenal fistula. We present the case of a patient admitted to our hospital due to severe weight loss, malnutrition and bowel obstruction. The patient was diagnosed of advanced right colon cancer with coloduodenal fistula and concomitant liver metastasis. According to diagnosis, palliative surgery was performed. 1 INTRODUCTION mia, diarrhea or feculent vomiting. (1)(5) Diagnosis is based on upper endoscopy and olorectal cancer is one of the most frequent colonoscopy, which can also provide the biopsy for malignancies among developed countries. CLocally advanced cases range from 5 to 25%. histopathological confirmation. The gold standard The specific invasion of the duodenum has been radiology test is the CT scan. reported to account for 0, 4 %. ((1),(2) Management of malignant duodenal fistula poses a This clinical entity has become a rare event in present dilemma to surgeons.