6 FEATURESFEATURES

The Good,

the Bad

and the Ugly

of Globalisation By JANSON YAP & AMANDA HUAN

SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 FEATURES 7

Globalisation was once heralded as the beacon of hope for developing countries, an escape route that would allow them to climb out of poverty. However, an anti-globalisation backlash, tinged with the resurgence of nationalism, has put globalisation into the hot seat. The swing of votes to far-right parties in Germany and other European states, and the election of US President , has reset the globalisation agenda.

SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 8 FEATURES

lobalisation is a word that has meant the year 3,000 BC as its beginning, while others Gdifferent things to different people. say it started in the 15th century.

It can simply be defined as the internationalisation While the origins may be disputed, the of relations across borders, which facilitates the common theme among most historians exchange of knowledge, trade, and around today is the basis of trade and exploration. the world. From the establishment of the Silk route and the voyages of the Spice traders, Aspects of globalisation tend to be grouped in the multinational trade led to key developments political, economic and social spheres. Drilling in agrarian reform, manufacturing and down, globalisation can be viewed in other industrialisation. buckets, such as health, environmental, scientific, technological and cultural cooperation. The table, “Phases of Globalisation”, captures the main changes that globalisation has Eras of globalisation produced, and that have, in turn, changed the Globalisation has a long history. Some point to mood and mode of globalisation.

Phases of Globalisation

Phase Period Key Characteristics

Phase 1: Technical Revolution 1800s – 1940s - Use of gold standard, making currencies convertible - Rapid increase in international exchange of goods and assets

Deglobalisation WWI and WWII - End of gold standard - Economic closure of nations due to war - The period of the Great Depression

Phase 2: Consolidation 1950s – 1980s - Introduction of Bretton Woods institutions ( and International Monetary Fund) - Launch of European Payments Union, opening borders to trade - Generalisation of currency convertibility - Fall of the Berlin Wall - Rise of Asian tiger economies

Phase 3: Hyperglobalisation 1990s – present - Break-up of the Soviet bloc, allowing ex-Soviet countries to join the European market economy - At least two major global financial crises - Spread of global terrorism - Rise of socioeconomic inequality

Source: Adapted from Antimo Verde, Is globalisation doomed? The economic and political threats to the future of globalisation (Springer Nature, 2017).

SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 FEATURES 9

Modern Drivers of Globalisation

International Trade

Information Transportation Technology

Telecommunications

International Geopolitics Investments

Source: Adapted from Ken Moak, Developed nations and the economic impact of globalisation (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).

Drivers of globalisation Portugal and cloth producers from England. The factors driving globalisation has changed with By demonstrating that it took fewer workers in each era. The forces in play today are depicted in Portugal to make wine than it does cloth and vice the diagram, “Modern Drivers of Globalisation”. versa in England, he posited that both countries were better off if Portugal exported its wine to However, throughout history, the drivers of England and England exported its cloth to Portugal. globalisation are underpinned by the principle of international trade – . Therein ran the main argument of comparative British economist illustrated advantage and the basis of – and a this with an example of wine growers from resultant globalised world.

SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 10 FEATURES

The Good The Bad Without doubt, much good has come out of It would seem that the good that came with globalisation, at least for a large part of its globalisation also ushered in the bad. Among history. the negative consequences are by-products of interdependence and interconnectivity. These Nobel Prize economist and philosopher Amartya include the spread of environmental pollution, Sen said that “globalisation has enriched the diseases, cross-border crime, international world scientifically and culturally, and has terrorism and global financial crises. provided vast economic benefits”. Air pollution associated with the production of goods and services for international trade has been linked to premature deaths of more than 760,000 people, according to a 2017 study on transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and cross-border trade.

Developing countries and multinational corporations, in particular, gained access to global markets through trade. Global trade created new jobs and boosted manufacturing. Countries that integrated into the global economy saw increases in their gross domestic product (GDP). Technological advancement, The growing inequality between societies has foreign direct investment, information exchange also led to transmigration and urbanisation. and the development of skills and knowledge Sometimes referred to as the “North-South fed the growth of the four “Asian tiger divide”, the widening chasm between the “haves” economies” of South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and the “have-nots” has been in the spotlight and Singapore. and blamed for sputtering growth in the world’s developed, as well as developing, countries. However, decades on, the glossy veneer of globalisation has started to lose its shine. Since the 1970s, lower-skilled European and At the 2017 World Economic Forum, international American workers have seen the real value economist and free-trade proponent Dambisa of their wages drop by more than 20 per cent. Moyo acknowledged that “there have been Productivity and have become significant losses from globalisation”. buzz words of developed economies, while

SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 FEATURES 11

protectionist arguments have gained momentum. destabilises governments who face increasing These are not confined to strident nationalism. pressures to “right the wrongs” and be more transparent. Interestingly, the anti-globalisation movement is a mixed bag. While protectionist calls to restrict Oxfam reports that 82 per cent of the wealth the free flow of labour and capital across borders generated in 2017 went to the richest one per cent have come from the conservative right, the liberal of the global population while 3.7 billion people left has also expressed disillusionment with the who make up the poorest half of the world saw initial promise of globalisation. International aid no increase in wealth. groups like Oxfam attribute rising socioeconomic inequality to the exploitation of developing countries by corporations.

Wage restraint, tax evasion and the squeezing of suppliers as remain overly focused on high returns are some of the supporting arguments.

Once seen as an equalising force to transform developing economies, globalisation is now seen as contributing to social inequality. In a report entitled Causes and Consequences of In 1997, economist was one of the Income Inequality: A Global Perspective (2015), the first to warn about the growing destabilisation of International Monetary Fund (IMF acknowledged the global economy caused by rising inequality, that globalisation has exacerbated economic in his book, Has Globalisation Gone Too Far? inequalities across the world. Technological Arguing that globalisation exposes social advances, in particular, have aggravated the pace fissures between those with the education, of unequal development. skills and mobility to flourish in an unfettered world market, he cautioned against the growing The Ugly tension and hardening positions on both sides of Rising inequality brings about huge social the political divide. costs to society. Countries with wider income gaps tend to yield citizens with poorer physical A buoyant international economy, surging and mental health. Homicide rates are also higher stock markets and an emerging drowned in these societies. out his dissenting voice. Today, technological change, demographic trends (e.g. growth At a macro level, inequality is a source of of ageing societies in developed countries), social conflict within a country and dampens migration, international terrorism and climate a country’s overall growth. Socioeconomic change have thrown a spanner in the unrelenting disparity emphasises fissures in societies and pace of globalisation.

SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 12 FEATURES

Socioeconomic inequality is articulated around agents have proposed and/or implemented the world in different ways (see box, “How policies that would help diminish the divide. Inequality is Felt Around the World”). For example, Christine Lagarde, Managing The solution Director of the IMF, has been a leading voice for Inequality is best tackled at multiple levels. better wealth distribution and for countries to embrace inclusive growth. This entails greater At the global level, international organisations emphasis on retraining and vocational training, such as the United Nations, the World Trade preparation for technological advances, and Organization, the IMF, and other civil society stronger fiscal policies.

How Inequality is Felt Around the World US Europe Asia

Americans who were The 2016 Brexit referendum An economic giant flexing its affected by globalisation was a reflection of the muscle on the global stage, blamed businesses and the dissatisfaction felt by many the Chinese government is government for promoting/ UK voters toward a system nonetheless preoccupied with supporting globalisation. that they perceived as unfair. the attempt to redistribute wealth Unskilled labour forces were more equally, or at least to be By 2014, more than 10 million worried about the impact of seen as tackling the twin evils workers had lost their jobs on jobs and wages. of corruption and rising social and protectionists blamed Indeed, votes for Brexit were inequality. capital transfer abroad and strongest in regions that were competition from emerging most affected by the flight of The emerging economies of Asian countries. This was manufacturing. Southeast Asia are meanwhile not an ideal breeding ground immune to the anti-globalisation for Donald Trump’s “Make In Germany, Austria, Sweden movement. However, the America Great Again” and Denmark, the rise of economic upside of export- campaign. populist and nationalist parties focused growth and trade has in recent elections have caught somewhat overshadowed the Since his election as US the world’s attention. Underlying inequalities that have resulted. President, Mr Trump has tried the anti-immigration rhetoric of Singapore, for example, has one to address two factors that these parties is a rejection of of the highest Gini coefficients (a he perceives drive inequality: growing wealth disparity and higher coefficient indicates less free trade agreements and social inequality. equitable income distribution) in uncontrolled immigration. the world.

SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 FEATURES 13

Separately, Oxfam’s recommendations for The inequality that has resulted from businesses include limiting returns to shareholders globalisation is not sustainable. As outlined and senior management and ensuring that by international trade expert, Uri Dadush, the workers receive a minimum “living” wage. willingness and ability of a country to engage in globalisation critically depends on the At the national level, governments should ensure social and political consensus that underpins that the wealthy pay “fair” taxes and also look the nation. If the consensus in support for at increasing public spending on healthcare globalisation is broken, countries will be forced and education and making them more widely to disengage from the world. This effect cannot available. The main idea is to compensate be constrained. those who have been hurt by globalisation. Compensation may be in the form of wealth The interdependence, that is in itself a consequence redistribution, retraining, or more robust of globalisation, ensures that if one country welfare plans. collapses or withdraws from the system, this will cause ripples through the system, pulling At the very least, countries should acknowledge other countries with it. In the worst-case that “trickle-down” theories of wealth do scenario, some scholars predict that the world not work, and that attention must be paid will end up in a “Mad Max” situation, to addressing inequality. In 2018, an Oxfam- an apocalyptic dystopia. commissioned global study surveyed 700,000 people in 10 countries and found that nearly In order to continue yielding the benefits of two-thirds of all respondents thought that the globalisation, business leaders and politicians gap between the rich and the poor needed to will have to address the negative outcomes, be urgently addressed. The consequences of especially . To quote neglecting inequality are real and need to be Amartya Sen again: “There are important acknowledged. issues of equity and fairness that have to be addressed by each country and also by the What next? global community.” This will entail corrective Is globalisation still relevant? According to the action being undertaken by multiple business and political elite at the 2018 World stakeholders, including businesses, civil society, Economic Forum, the answer is “yes”. While not and governments. a resounding affirmation, the fact is that there is no other more viable option. Janson Yap is Regional Managing Director of Risk Advisory, Deloitte Asia Pacific and Southeast Asia and Chief Innovation Officer for Deloitte While the pace of globalisation might slow, it is Southeast Asia. an unrelenting process because the genie is out of the bottle. Short of isolationism, countries that Amanda Huan is a Senior Analyst at the Centre for engage in protectionist policies and separationist Multilateralism Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of rhetoric will find themselves outnumbered and International Studies, Nanyang Technological embroiled in a no-win situation. University.

SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3 SID DIRECTORS BULLETIN 2018 Q3