DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact of Diesel Emissions from Port Facilities on Local Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impact of Diesel Emissions from Port Facilities on Local Communities Impact of Diesel Emissions from Port Facilities on Local Communities NOVEMBER 2015 IMPACT OF DIESEL EMISSIONS FROM PORT FACILITIES ON LOCAL COMMUNITIES i The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is dedicated to uniting the region’s elected officials, planning professionals, and the public with a common vision of making a great region even greater. Shaping the way we live, work, and play, DVRPC builds consensus on improving transportation, promoting smart growth, protecting the environment, and enhancing the economy. We serve a diverse region of nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. DVRPC is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Greater Philadelphia Region — leading the way to a better future. The symbol in our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for the findings and conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice, and related nondiscrimination statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC’s website, www.dvrpc.org, may be translated into multiple languages. Publications and other public documents can be made available in alternative languages and formats, if requested. DVRPC public meetings are always held in ADA-accessible facilities and in transit-accessible locations when possible. Auxiliary services can be provided to individuals who submit a request at least seven days prior to a meeting. Requests made within seven days will be accommodated to the greatest extent possible. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice by DVRPC under Title VI has a right to file a formal complaint. Any such complaint may be in writing and filed with DVRPC’s Title VI Compliance Manager and/or the appropriate state or federal agency within 180 days of the alleged discriminatory occurrence. For more information on DVRPC’s Title VI program, or to obtain a Title VI Complaint Form, please call (215) 592-1800 or email [email protected]. Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Demographics around Ports ............................................................................................................................. 4 Health and Air Pollution .................................................................................................................................... 5 Air Quality and Freight Movement ................................................................................................................... 7 Regulations on Diesel Engines ........................................................................................................................ 9 MOVES Emissions Modeling .......................................................................................................................... 10 Analysis Results .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Funding Programs and Peer City Initiatives ................................................................................................. 14 Funding Sources ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Peer Port Initiatives ................................................................................................................................... 15 Local Initiatives .......................................................................................................................................... 16 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 Tables Table 1: Selected Demographic Statistics for the DVRPC Region and Census Tracts Near Port Facilities .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Table 2: Indicators of Potential Disadvantage Characteristics of the Region and Census Tracts Hosting Port Facilities ............................................................................................................................. 5 Table 3: Selected Health Statistics for ZIP Codes within 0.5 mile of Port Facilities in Southeastern Pennsylvania ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Table 4: Monthly Totals of Marine Vessels in Delaware River Port Facilities, 2010–2013 .................... 8 Table 5: Freight Projections for Philadelphia CSA (2015–2040) ............................................................ 9 Table 6: Comparison of Emissions (Grams per Day) between Groups of Vehicles Based on Model Year (All Vehicle Classes) .......................................................................................................... 12 Table 7: Comparison of Emissions (Grams per Day) between Groups of Vehicles Based on Model Year (Class 8 Vehicles Only) ..................................................................................................... 12 Table 8: Emissions Rate Reductions for Four Age Groups of HDDVs ................................................. 13 Appendices Appendix A: Map of NHS Connectors in the Heavy-duty Diesel Vehicle Emissions Analysis........................................................................................................................................................... A-1 IMPACT OF DIESEL EMISSIONS FROM PORT FACILITIES ON LOCAL COMMUNITIES i Executive Summary This paper examines on-road emissions from diesel trucks that serve selected port facilities in the Greater Philadelphia region and identifies environmental justice issues impacting the communities that host port facilities. Generally, the communities surrounding ports exhibit higher rates of poverty, host larger minority populations, and have higher rates of respiratory and cardiovascular disease and poorer health outcomes than the region at large. The health outcomes in communities surrounding ports are exacerbated by the concentration of diesel engine emissions from marine vessels visiting the ports, equipment used to offload the vessels, and trucks and locomotives that transport goods from the ports to the larger region and beyond. In an attempt to quantify on-road diesel emissions from Heavy-duty Vehicles (HDV) serving the ports, DVRPC utilized existing vehicle class and traffic counts on seven National Highway System (NHS) connectors to model the emissions from HDVs (trucks weighing more than 16,001 lbs., or vehicle classes 5, 6, 7, and, 8 Gross Vehicle Weight Rating) on roadways serving port facilities using the MOVES 2010 emissions model. From that analysis, emissions were calculated for Class 8 vehicles to demonstrate the benefits of programs that would facilitate updating the fleet of HDVs visiting port facilities in the region. This analysis strategy was chosen because the data on HDV counts was readily available, and these trucks travel through the communities adjacent to port facilities. Air quality modeling analysis shows that emissions rates for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) for the groups of HDVs traveling on these NHS connectors that are model year (MY) 2007 or later are between 83 and 95 percent lower than the emissions rates for the pre-2007 MY trucks in that same fleet. The difference in emissions rates for the Class 8 HDVs is even greater, with emissions rates for the post-MY 2007 fleet of trucks being between 88 and 96 percent lower than the pre-MY 2007 HDVs traveling on these seven NHS connectors. Other ports in the Mid-Atlantic region have piloted programs to mitigate emissions from diesel sources, including HDV replacement programs. This paper includes a survey of these activities at ports in the Mid- Atlantic region. The paper recommends adoption of funding strategies to spur action to reduce the environmental and public health impact of goods movement in and through the communities surrounding port facilities. Beginning in 2017, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) will implement a ban on pre-MY 2007 diesel trucks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 37 of Title 2.2 the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (Effective July 1, 2021)
    Chapter 37 of Title 2.2 The Virginia Freedom of Information Act (Effective July 1, 2021) 2.2-3700. Short title; policy 2.2-3701. Definitions 2.2-3702. Notice of chapter 2.2-3703. Public bodies and records to which chapter inapplicable; voter registration and election records; access by persons incarcerated in a state, local, or federal correctional facility 2.2-3703.1. Disclosure pursuant to court order or subpoena 2.2-3704. Public records to be open to inspection; procedure for requesting records and responding to request; charges; transfer of records for storage, etc. 2.2-3704.01. Records containing both excluded and nonexcluded information; duty to redact 2.2-3704.1. Posting of notice of rights and responsibilities by state and local public bodies; assistance by the Freedom of Information Advisory Council 2.2-3704.2. Public bodies to designate FOIA officer 2.2-3704.3. Training for local officials 2.2-3705. Repealed 2.2-3705.1. Exclusions to application of chapter; exclusions of general application to public bodies 2.2-3705.2. Exclusions to application of chapter; records relating to public safety 2.2-3705.3. Exclusions to application of chapter; records relating to administrative investigations 2.2-3705.4. Exclusions to application of chapter; educational records and certain records of educational institutions 2.2-3705.5. Exclusions to application of chapter; health and social services records 2.2-3705.6. (Effective until October 1, 2021) Exclusions to application of chapter; proprietary records and trade secrets 2.2-3705.6. (Effective October 1, 2021, until January 1, 2022) Exclusions to application of chapter; proprietary records and trade secrets 2.2-3705.6.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Norfolk Budget Book.Book
    WE WORK TOGETHER... City Council ● Azalea Acres ● Faith Based Community ● City Manager ● Azalea Lakes ● Nonprofit Organizations ● Attorney ● Ballentine Place ● Arts and Culture Partners ● Finance ● Bayview ● Medical Community ● Human Resources ● Beacon Light ● Norfolk International Airport ● Sheriff ● Bel-Aire ● Business Community ● Public Health ● Belvedere ● Virginia Port Authority ● Human Services ● Bollingbrook ● Educational Community ● Waste Management ● Broad Creek ● Military ● Public Works ● Bruce's Park ● Faith Based Community ● Libraries ● Camellia Gardens ● Nonprofit Organizations ● Elections ● Camellia Shores ● Arts and Culture Partners ● Planning ● Campostella ● Medical Community ● Seven Venues ● Campostella Heights ● Norfolk International Airport ● Police ● Central Brambleton ● Business Community ● Fire-Rescue ● Chesterfield Heights ● Virginia Port Authority ● Neighborhoods ● Coleman Place ● Educational Community ● Budget and Strategic Planning ● Colonial Place Riverview ● Military ● Development ● Coronado ● Faith Based Community ● Communication and Technology ● Inglenook ● Nonprofit Organizations ● CSB ● Cottage Line ● Arts and Culture Partners ● Water ● Cottage Road Park ● Medical Community ● Wastewater ● Cromwell Farm ● Norfolk International Airport ● Storm Water ● Ellsworth ● Business Community ● Zoo ● Crossroads Civic League ● Virginia Port Authority ● Nauticus ● Cruser Place ● Educational Community ● Homelessness ● Downtown Norfolk ● Military ● General Services ● East Fairmount ● Faith Based Community ● Cemeteries ●
    [Show full text]
  • Virginian Pilot
    VIRGINIAN PILOT As Virginia mulls port privatization, Baltimore dives in BALTIMORE The state is tight on money, but the region needs roadwork and the port is figuring out how to pay for a needed expansion. Sounds a lot like Hampton Roads, but this state, region and port are about 170 miles north, or a day's steam up the Chesapeake Bay. On Jan. 12, Maryland closed on a lease of the Port of Baltimore's primary container facility, Seagirt Marine Terminal, to a private operator for 50 years. The deal is expected to generate hundreds of millions of dollars for the state, which plans to use some of the money to pay for an array of regional road and bridge projects. The state of Virginia and the Virginia Port Authority face a similar decision: whether to cede operational control of the port of Hampton Roads for a long time in exchange for a lot of money. Three companies have submitted proposals to operate the state-owned cargo terminals. Maryland officials say they're elated over the lease of Seagirt to Ports America Chesapeake, an affiliate of New Jersey-based Ports America, the largest independent port operator in North America. It does business in Hampton Roads as a 50 percent partner in the stevedoring firm CP&O. The agreement is estimated to be worth as much as $1.8 billion over time. The Maryland Transportation Authority is getting $140 million in upfront cash that it plans to use on eight projects, including improvements to Interstate 95 and bridge upgrades. Ports America also agreed to invest $105.5 million to build a fourth berth at Seagirt.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Movement to and from the Port of Virginia
    Commonwealth Transportation Board February 15, 2012 Intermodal Movement to and from The Port of Virginia Jerry Bridges Executive Director Virginia Port Authority 1 VPA Terminals 2 Top 10 U.S. East Coast Ports* U.S. East Coast Rank Port TEUs Market Share 1 New York/New Jersey 5,292,025 31% 2 Savannah 2,825,179 19% 3 The Port of Virginia 1,895,017 11% 4 Charleston 1,364,504 8% 5 Jacksonville 857,374 5% 6 Miami 847,249 5% 7 Port Everglades 793,227 5% 8 Baltimore 610,922 4% 9 Philadelphia 276,106 2% 10 Wilmington (NC) 265,074 2% *2010 data 3 The Port’s Economic Impact • Cargo worth more than $41 billion is moved to more than 14,000 U.S. businesses in 48 states • 343,000 jobs, every 9th job in Virginia – $13.5 B in income – Total revenues of $41.1 B FY 06 Virginia Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Virginia Port Authority Operations, The Mason School of Business Compete Center, Jan.2008 4 Intermodal Transportation Trucks 66% Barge 4% Rail 30% 5 Forecasted Global Demand • U.S. containerized cargo traffic will grow at twice the rate of GDP U.S. Containerized Cargo Forecast 90,000,000 80,000,000 70,000,000 60,000,000 Forecasted: 40 M TEUs Growth by 2022 50,000,000 TEUs 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0 GDP (2-3%) TEUs Forecast 6 Population Centers & 2040 Cargo Forecasts Less than 6,600 TEUs 6.601 - 33,000 TEUs 33,001 - 88,000 TEUs 88,001 - 198,000 TEUs 198,001 - 440,000 TEUs 7 Panama Canal Expansion • Complete 2014-2015 • Expanded by 400’ long, 70’ wide, 18’ deep • Ships holding up to 18,000 TEUs will be able to traverse the canal – Currently moves ships with 4,400 TEUs 8 Port is Poised for Growth • Virginia has elements of a successful port – Unrestricted deep water channels – Efficient port infrastructure – Efficient inland transportation • Advantages over competitive ports – Other East Coast ports have limited expansion options – Virginia is the only port in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Commerce in Greater Philadelphia
    MARITIME COMMERCE IN GREATER PHILADELPHIA Assessing Industry Trends and Growth Opportunities for Delaware River Ports July 2008 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Maritime Commerce In Greater Philadelphia Executive Summary 3 Introduction and Project Partners 8 Section 1: Economic Impact Analysis 9 Section 2: Delaware River Port Descriptions & Key Competitors 12 Section 3: Global Trends and Implications for Delaware River Ports 24 Section 4: Strategies and Scenarios for Future Growth 31 Section 5: Conclusions and Key Recommendations 38 Appendices Appendix A: Glossary 40 Appendix B: History of the Delaware River Ports 42 Appendix C: Methodology for Economic Impact Analysis 46 Appendix D: Port-Reliant Employment 48 Appendix E: Excerpts from Expert Panel Discussions 49 Appendix F: Port Profiles 55 Appendix G: Additional Data 57 Appendix H: Delaware River Port Maps 62 Appendix I: End Notes 75 Appendix J: Resources 76 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary For more than 300 years, the from origin to final destination. supports 12,121 jobs and $772 mil- Delaware River has served as a key ⇒ Implications for Delaware lion in labor income, generating $2.4 commercial highway for the region. River Ports. The region has ca- billion in economic output. While Greater Philadelphia’s mari- pacity to accommodate growth, The port industry’s regional job time roots remain, rapid globalization but its ports must collaborate to base is relatively small, but those jobs and technological advances are driv- develop a comprehensive plan generate higher than average income ing an industry-wide transformation that addresses existing con- and output per job. Regional direct that has impacted the role that Dela- straints and rationally allocates jobs represent an average annual in- ware River ports play in the larger cargo based on competitive ad- come (including fringe benefits) of economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Highway Projects Description
    MARINE HIGHWAY PROJECTS DESCRIPTION American Samoa Inter-Island Waterways Services Applicant: Pago Pago, Port of ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Baton Rouge – New Orleans Shuttle Service Applicant: New Orleans, Port of ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Bridgeport to Jefferson Port Ferry Service Applicant: Connecticut Port Authority ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Cape May – Lewes Ferry Applicant: Delaware River and Bay Authority .................................................................................................................................... 7 Chambers County – Houston Container on Barge Expansion Service Applicant: Chambers County ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Cross Gulf Container Expansion Project Applicant: Brownsville, Port and Manatee, Port ................................................................................................................................ 9 Cross Sound Ferry Enhancement Project Applicant: I-95 Corridor Coalition ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 VIRGINIA Virginia Ranks 44Th Among the States in Number of Local
    VIRGINIA as a township government for census purposes. As of October 2007, there were no Virginia ranks 44th among the states in township governments in Virginia. number of local governments, with 511 as of October 2007. Under Virginia law, tier-cities are incorporated communities within a consolidated county with COUNTY GOVERNMENTS (95) a population of 5,000 or more that have been designated as tier-cities by the general The entire area of the state is encompassed by assembly. These governments have both the county government except for areas located powers of a town and such additional powers within the boundaries of the cities. Cities in as may be granted by the general assembly. Virginia exist outside the area of any county As of October 2007, there were no tier-city and are counted as municipal rather than governments in Virginia. county governments. The county governing body may be called the county board of Township Governments (0) supervisors, county board, or urban county board of supervisors. Virginia has no township governments as defined for census purposes. The "townships" SUBCOUNTY GENERAL PURPOSE in Virginia are described above under GOVERNMENTS (229) "Municipal Governments." Municipal Governments (229) PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEMS (135) Municipal governments in Virginia are the city School District Governments (1) governments and town governments, which are classified generally by population size as The Eastern Virginia Medical College, formerly follows: the Medical College of Hampton Roads and, earlier, the Eastern Virginia Medical Authority, Cities: 5,000 inhabitants or more is the only school district government in Virginia. This college was established by Towns: 1,000 inhabitants or more special act.
    [Show full text]
  • Action on Fiscal Year 2021 Annual
    Commonwealth Transportation Board Shannon Valentine 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701 Chairperson Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786-2940 Agenda item #16 RESOLUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD December 9, 2020 MOTION Made By: Mr. Rucker, Seconded By: Dr. Smoot Action: Motion Carried, Unanimously Title: Action on Fiscal Year 2021 Annual Budgets Commonwealth Transportation Fund, Department of Rail and Public Transportation and the Virginia Department of Transportation WHEREAS, the Commonwealth Transportation Board is required by §§ 33.2-214 (B) and 33.2-221 (C) of the Code of Virginia (Code) to administer and allocate funds in the Transportation Trust Fund, based on the most recent official Commonwealth Transportation Fund revenue forecast; and WHEREAS, § 33.2-1524.1 of the Code requires a portion of the funds in the Transportation Trust Fund to be set aside and distributed to construction programs pursuant to § 33.2-358, the Commonwealth Mass Transit Fund, Commonwealth Rail Fund, the Commonwealth Port Fund, the Commonwealth Aviation Fund, the Commonwealth Space Flight Fund, the Priority Transportation Fund and a special fund within the Commonwealth Transportation Fund to be used to meet the necessary expenses of the Department of Motor Vehicles; and WHEREAS, § 33.2-358 (A) of the Code requires the Board to allocate each year from all funds made available for highway purposes such amount as it deems reasonable and necessary for the maintenance of roads within the interstate system of highways, the primary system of
    [Show full text]
  • VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016
    VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2016 The Virginia Port Authority is a component unit of the Commonwealth of Virginia. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY A COMPONENT UNIT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 Prepared by the Finance Division of the Virginia Port Authority TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter from the CEO and Executive Director 1 – 3 Letter of Transmittal 5 – 9 GFOA Certificate of Achievement 11 Board of Commissioners - current 13 Organizational Chart 15 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor’s Report on Financial Statements 17 – 19 Management’s Discussion and Analysis 21 – 29 Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position 30 – 31 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 33 Statement of Cash Flows 34 – 35 Notes to Financial Statements 36 – 89 Required Supplementary Information 90 – 95 STATISTICAL SECTION Net Position by Component 97 Historical Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 98 Historical Revenue Comparisons 99 Historical Debt Issuances 101 Debt Service Requirements 102 – 104 Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type to Operating Revenues 105 Outstanding Debt by Type 106 Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage 107 Historical Debt Service Coverage Ratios 108 Demographic and Economic Information 109 – 111 Twenty-Foot Equivalent Unit Container Throughput 113 Calendar Year 2015 Trade Overview 114 – 117 Other Operational Information 118 Capital Assets
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Port Authority Truck Reservation System Expansion and Automated Work Flow Data Model
    VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY TRUCK RESERVATION SYSTEM EXPANSION AND AUTOMATED WORK FLOW DATA MODEL Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Initiative Grant Application Prepared for: Prepared by: June 2017 Project Name Truck Reservation System and Automated Work Flow Data Model Applying Entity Virginia Port Authority Total Project Cost $3,100,000 ATCMTD Request $1,550,000 Matching Funds Restricted to Specific Project Component No Project Location Virginia Included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)? No Included in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)? No Included in the MPO Long Range Transportation Plan? No Included in the State Long Range Transportation Plan? No Technologies to be Deployed RFID tag readers to expand to three other terminals Integration with container inventory management system for automating work flow Developing data model for standardizing status up- dates to truck dispatchers VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY TRUCK RESERVATION SYSTEM EXPANSION AND AUTOMATED WORK FLOW DATA MODEL Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Initiative VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY Truck Reservation System Expansion and Automated Work Flow Data Model June 2017 Prepared for Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Initiative Grant Application Prepared by Project Name Truck Reservation System and Automated Work Flow Data Model Applying Entity Virginia Port Authority Total Project Cost $3,100,000 ATCMTD Request $1,550,000 Matching
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution 21-11
    RESOLUTION 21-11 AUTHORIZING THE VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR THE NORFOLK HARBOR NAVIGATION DREDGING IMPROVEMENTS AT THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL EAST WHEREAS, the Virginia Port Authority (the “Authority”), a body corporate and a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, has been established pursuant to Chapter 10, Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority is empowered to rent, lease, buy, own, acquire, construct, reconstruct, and dispose of harbors, seaports, port facilities and such property, whether real or personal, as it may find necessary or convenient and issue revenue bonds therefore without pledging the faith and credit of the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Authority is empowered to cooperate with, and to act as an agent for, the United States of America or any agency, department, corporation or instrumentality thereof in the maintenance, development, improvement, and use of harbors and seaports of the Commonwealth; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of its powers and duty, the Authority intends to complete the Norfolk Harbor Navigation dredging improvements at Thimble Shoal Channel East of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel and Meeting Area 2 to the required depth of fifty-six feet with one foot of allowable over depth (hereafter “Thimble Shoal Channel East Dredging Project”); and WHEREAS, the Authority entered into Memoranda of Understanding with the City of Norfolk and the City of Virginia Beach to provide an
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Government in Brief
    2018-2022 2018-2022 VIRGINIA GOVERNMENT2018 - 2022 IN BRIEF Governor Ralph S. Northam 1 VIRGINIA GOVERNMENT IN BRIEF INTRODUCTION The following publication provides a short and concise description of Virginia’s state and local governments. Specifically, this publication is designed to: describe the organization and mission of the various branches of state and local governments; outline the duties and responsibilities of major state and local agencies; and introduce special purpose districts and authorities that transcend traditional state and/or local jurisdictional lines. Lieutenant Governor Justin E. Fairfax 2 2018 - 2022 This handbook is an informational document on Virginia’s state and local governments. Since periodic changes take place in the institutional structure of state and local governments, the handbook is revised once every four years. Included in this publication are brief sections describing the nature and function of Virginia’s legislative and judicial processes. These sections help the reader to understand the interrelationship among the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of government. Attorney General Mark R. Herring 3 VIRGINIA GOVERNMENT IN BRIEF CONTENTS State Government …………………………. 6 The Election System ……………………………………. 6 Voter Registration ……………………………………….. 6 Department of Elections …………………………………. 7 Electoral Board ………………………………………….. 7 General Registrar/Director of Elections……….………… 8 Officers of Election ……………………………………… 8 The Election Process …………………………………….. 9 The Legislative Department ……………………………
    [Show full text]