DOCSLIB.ORG

Daylight Theory Manual Daylight Theory Manual Table of Contents Daylight Theory Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Daylight Theory Manual Daylight Theory Manual Table of Contents Daylight Theory Manual Daylight Theory Manual Daylight Theory Manual Table of Contents Daylight Theory Manual....................................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2. Molecules and Reactions in A Computer............................................................................................1 2.1 Representing Molecules..............................................................................................................1 2.2 Analyzing Molecules...................................................................................................................2 2.2.1 Cycles.................................................................................................................................2 2.2.2 Bond Type, Bond Order, and Aromaticity........................................................................2 2.2.3 Symmetry...........................................................................................................................3 2.2.4 Canonical Labeling............................................................................................................3 2.2.5 Chirality.............................................................................................................................3 2.3 Representing Reactions...............................................................................................................3 2.4 Depictions....................................................................................................................................4 3. SMILES - A Simplified Chemical Language......................................................................................5 3.1 Canonicalization..........................................................................................................................6 3.2 SMILES Specification Rules.......................................................................................................6 3.2.1 Atoms.................................................................................................................................6 3.2.2 Bonds.................................................................................................................................7 3.2.3 Branches.............................................................................................................................8 3.2.4 Cyclic Structures................................................................................................................8 3.2.5 Disconnected Structures....................................................................................................9 3.3 Isomeric SMILES........................................................................................................................9 3.3.1 Isotopic Specification......................................................................................................10 3.3.2 Configuration Around Double Bonds..............................................................................10 3.3.3. Configuration Around Tetrahedral Centers....................................................................10 3.3.4 General Chiral Specification............................................................................................12 3.4 SMILES Conventions................................................................................................................13 3.4.1 Hydrogens........................................................................................................................13 3.4.2 Aromaticity......................................................................................................................14 3.4.3 Aromatic Nitrogen Compounds.......................................................................................15 3.4.4 Bonding Conventions......................................................................................................15 3.4.5 Tautomers........................................................................................................................15 3.5 Extensions for Reactions...........................................................................................................16 3.5.1 Reaction Atom Maps.......................................................................................................17 3.5.2 Hydrogens........................................................................................................................18 3.6 Acknowledgments.....................................................................................................................19 4. SMARTS - A Language for Describing Molecular Patterns.............................................................19 4.1 Atomic Primitives......................................................................................................................19 4.2 Bond Primitives.........................................................................................................................20 4.3 Logical Operators......................................................................................................................21 4.4 Recursive SMARTS..................................................................................................................21 4.5 Component-level grouping of SMARTS..................................................................................22 4.6 Reaction Queries.......................................................................................................................22 4.7 SMARTS Versus SMILES........................................................................................................24 4.8 Efficiency Considerations.........................................................................................................25 4.9 Examples...................................................................................................................................25 5. SMIRKS - A Reaction Transform Language.....................................................................................26 5.1 Description................................................................................................................................26 5.2 Representation...........................................................................................................................27 i Daylight Theory Manual Table of Contents Daylight Theory Manual 5.3 Transform Grammar..................................................................................................................27 5.4 Examples...................................................................................................................................28 6. Fingerprints - Screening and Similarity.............................................................................................30 6.1 A Brief History of Screening Large Databases.........................................................................31 6.1.1 Structural keys.................................................................................................................32 6.1.2 Fingerprints......................................................................................................................33 6.1.3 Variable-sized Fingerprints..............................................................................................34 6.1.4 In-memory Screening......................................................................................................35 6.2 Fingerprints and Reactions........................................................................................................36 6.2.1 Structural Reaction Fingerprints............................................................................................36 6.2.2 Reaction Difference Fingerprints...........................................................................................36 6.3 Similarity Measures...................................................................................................................37 6.3.1 Tversky Index..................................................................................................................39 6.3.2 User-defined and Named Similarity indexes...................................................................40 7. THOR - Chemical Database System..................................................................................................42 7.1 Hash Table.................................................................................................................................42 7.2 Servers and Clients....................................................................................................................44 7.3 Identifiers...................................................................................................................................45 7.4 The THOR Data Tree................................................................................................................46 7.5 Datatypes...................................................................................................................................48 7.5.1 Creating Datatypes...........................................................................................................48 7.5.2 Standardization................................................................................................................49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Alexandria Library, a Quantum-Chemical Database of Molecular Properties for Force field Development 9 2017 Received: October 1 1 1 Mohammad M
    www.nature.com/scientificdata OPEN Data Descriptor: The Alexandria library, a quantum-chemical database of molecular properties for force field development 9 2017 Received: October 1 1 1 Mohammad M. Ghahremanpour , Paul J. van Maaren & David van der Spoel Accepted: 19 February 2018 Published: 10 April 2018 Data quality as well as library size are crucial issues for force field development. In order to predict molecular properties in a large chemical space, the foundation to build force fields on needs to encompass a large variety of chemical compounds. The tabulated molecular physicochemical properties also need to be accurate. Due to the limited transparency in data used for development of existing force fields it is hard to establish data quality and reusability is low. This paper presents the Alexandria library as an open and freely accessible database of optimized molecular geometries, frequencies, electrostatic moments up to the hexadecupole, electrostatic potential, polarizabilities, and thermochemistry, obtained from quantum chemistry calculations for 2704 compounds. Values are tabulated and where available compared to experimental data. This library can assist systematic development and training of empirical force fields for a broad range of molecules. Design Type(s) data integration objective • molecular physical property analysis objective Measurement Type(s) physicochemical characterization Technology Type(s) Computational Chemistry Factor Type(s) Sample Characteristic(s) 1 Uppsala Centre for Computational Chemistry, Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 596, SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.v.d.S. (email: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Flexible Heuristic Algorithm for Automatic Molecule Fragmentation: Application to the UNIFAC Group Contribution Model Simon Müller*
    Müller J Cheminform (2019) 11:57 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-019-0382-3 Journal of Cheminformatics RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Flexible heuristic algorithm for automatic molecule fragmentation: application to the UNIFAC group contribution model Simon Müller* Abstract A priori calculation of thermophysical properties and predictive thermodynamic models can be very helpful for developing new industrial processes. Group contribution methods link the target property to contributions based on chemical groups or other molecular subunits of a given molecule. However, the fragmentation of the molecule into its subunits is usually done manually impeding the fast testing and development of new group contribution methods based on large databases of molecules. The aim of this work is to develop strategies to overcome the challenges that arise when attempting to fragment molecules automatically while keeping the defnition of the groups as simple as possible. Furthermore, these strategies are implemented in two fragmentation algorithms. The frst algorithm fnds only one solution while the second algorithm fnds all possible fragmentations. Both algorithms are tested to frag- ment a database of 20,000 molecules for use with the group contribution model Universal Quasichemical Func- tional Group Activity Coefcients+ (UNIFAC). Comparison of the results with a reference database shows that both algorithms are capable of successfully fragmenting all the molecules automatically. Furthermore, when applying them on a larger database it is shown, that the newly developed algorithms are capable of fragmenting structures previously thought not possible to fragment. Keywords: Molecule fragmentation, Cheminformatics, RDKit, Property prediction, Group contribution method, UNIFAC, Incrementation Introduction named QSPR methods (Quantitative Structure Property Cheminformatics is a growing feld due to the increas- Relationship).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Database Projects Delivered by RSC Escience
    Chemical Database Projects Delivered by RSC eScience at the FDA Meeting “Development of a Freely Distributable Data System for the Registration of Substances” Antony Williams RSC eScience . What was once just ChemSpider is much more… . ChemSpider Reactions . Chemicals Validation and Standardization Platform . Learn Chemistry Wiki . National Chemical Database Service . Open PHACTS . PharmaSea . Global Chemistry Hub We are known for ChemSpider… . The Free Chemical Database . A central hub for chemists to source information . >28 million unique chemical records . Aggregated from >400 data sources . Chemicals, spectra, CIF files, movies, images, podcasts, links to patents, publications, predictions . A central hub for chemists to deposit & curate data We Want to Answer Questions . Questions a chemist might ask… . What is the melting point of n-heptanol? . What is the chemical structure of Xanax? . Chemically, what is phenolphthalein? . What are the stereocenters of cholesterol? . Where can I find publications about xylene? . What are the different trade names for Ketoconazole? . What is the NMR spectrum of Aspirin? . What are the safety handling issues for Thymol Blue? I want to know about “Vincristine” Vincristine: Identifiers and Properties Vincristine: Vendors and Sources Vincristine: Articles How did we build it? . We deal in Molfiles or SDF files – with coordinates . Deposit anything that has an InChI – we support what InChI can handle, good and bad . Standardization based on “InChI standardization” . InChIs aggregate (certain) tautomers The InChI Identifier Downsides of InChI . Good for small molecules – but no polymers, issues with inorganics, organometallics, imperfect stereochemistry. ChemSpider is “small molecules” . InChI used as the “deduplicator” – FIRST version of a compound into the database becomes THE structure to deduplicate against… Side Effects of InChI Usage SMILES by comparison… Side Effects of InChI Usage Searches: The INTERNET Search by InChI ChemSpider Google Search http://www.chemspider.com/google/ How did we build it? .
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Outcomes of Catalytic Reactions Using Machine Learning
    Predicting outcomes of catalytic reactions using ma- chine learning† Trevor David Rhone,∗a Robert Hoyt,a Christopher R. O’Connor,b Matthew M. Montemore,b,c Challa S.S.R. Kumar,b,c Cynthia M. Friend,b,c and Efthimios Kaxiras a,c Predicting the outcome of a chemical reaction using efficient computational models can be used to develop high-throughput screening techniques. This can significantly reduce the number of experiments needed to be performed in a huge search space, which saves time, effort and ex- pense. Recently, machine learning methods have been bolstering conventional structure-activity relationships used to advance understanding of chemical reactions. We have developed a model to predict the products of catalytic reactions on the surface of oxygen-covered and bare gold using machine learning. Using experimental data, we developed a machine learning model that maps reactants to products, using a chemical space representation. This involves predicting a chemical space value for the products, and then matching this value to a molecular structure chosen from a database. The database was developed by applying a set of possible reaction outcomes using known reaction mechanisms. Our machine learning approach complements chemical intuition in predicting the outcome of several types of chemical reactions. In some cases, machine learn- ing makes correct predictions where chemical intuition fails. We achieve up to 93% prediction accuracy for a small data set of less than two hundred reactions. 1 Introduction oped to aid in reaction prediction, they have generally involved Efficient prediction of reaction products has long been a major encoding this intuition into a set of rules, and have not been goal of the organic chemistry community 1–3 and the drug discov- widely adopted 2,6–9.
    [Show full text]
  • Umansysprop V1.0: an Online and Open-Source Facility for Molecular Property Prediction and Atmospheric Aerosol Calculations
    UManSysProp V1.0: An Online and Open-Source Facility for Molecular Property Prediction and Atmospheric Aerosol Calculations Topping, David and Barley, Mark and Bane, Michael and Higham, Nicholas J. and Aumont, Berbard and Dingle, Nicholas and McFiggans, Gordon 2016 MIMS EPrint: 2016.13 Manchester Institute for Mathematical Sciences School of Mathematics The University of Manchester Reports available from: http://eprints.maths.manchester.ac.uk/ And by contacting: The MIMS Secretary School of Mathematics The University of Manchester Manchester, M13 9PL, UK ISSN 1749-9097 Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 899–914, 2016 www.geosci-model-dev.net/9/899/2016/ doi:10.5194/gmd-9-899-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. UManSysProp v1.0: an online and open-source facility for molecular property prediction and atmospheric aerosol calculations David Topping1,2, Mark Barley2, Michael K. Bane3, Nicholas Higham4, Bernard Aumont5, Nicholas Dingle6, and Gordon McFiggans2 1National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK 2Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK 3High End Compute, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK 4School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK 5LISA, UMR CNRS 7583, Universite Paris Est Creteil et Universite Paris Diderot, Creteil, France 6Numerical Algorithms Group (NAG), Ltd Peter House Oxford Street, Manchester, M1 5AN, UK Correspondence to: David Topping ([email protected]) Received: 1 September 2015 – Published in Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss.: 3 November 2015 Revised: 3 February 2016 – Accepted: 16 February 2016 – Published: 1 March 2016 Abstract. In this paper we describe the development and opment of a user community.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Open Source to Drug Discovery
    Bringing Open Source to Drug Discovery Chris Swain Cambridge MedChem Consulting Standing on the shoulders of giants • There are a huge number of people involved in writing open source software • It is impossible to acknowledge them all individually • The slide deck will be available for download and includes 25 slides of details and download links – Copy on my website www.cambridgemedchemconsulting.com Why us Open Source software? • Allows access to source code – You can customise the code to suit your needs – If developer ceases trading the code can continue to be developed – Outside scrutiny improves stability and security What Resources are available • Toolkits • Databases • Web Services • Workflows • Applications • Scripts Toolkits • OpenBabel (htttp://openbabel.org) is a chemical toolbox – Ready-to-use programs, and complete programmer's toolkit – Read, write and convert over 110 chemical file formats – Filter and search molecular files using SMARTS and other methods, KNIME add-on – Supports molecular modeling, cheminformatics, bioinformatics – Organic chemistry, inorganic chemistry, solid-state materials, nuclear chemistry – Written in C++ but accessible from Python, Ruby, Perl, Shell scripts… Toolkits • OpenBabel • R • CDK • OpenCL • RDkit • SciPy • Indigo • NumPy • ChemmineR • Pandas • Helium • Flot • FROWNS • GNU Octave • Perlmol • OpenMPI Toolkits • RDKit (http://www.rdkit.org) – A collection of cheminformatics and machine-learning software written in C++ and Python. – Knime nodes – The core algorithms and data structures are written in C ++. Wrappers are provided to use the toolkit from either Python or Java. – Additionally, the RDKit distribution includes a PostgreSQL-based cartridge that allows molecules to be stored in relational database and retrieved via substructure and similarity searches.
    [Show full text]
  • PSC-Db: a Structured and Searchable 3D-Database for Plant Secondary Compounds
    molecules Article PSC-db: A Structured and Searchable 3D-Database for Plant Secondary Compounds Alejandro Valdés-Jiménez 1,† , Carlos Peña-Varas 2,†, Paola Borrego-Muñoz 3 , Lily Arrue 2 , Melissa Alegría-Arcos 2, Hussam Nour-Eldin 4, Ingo Dreyer 1 , Gabriel Nuñez-Vivanco 1 and David Ramírez 2,* 1 Center for Bioinformatics, Simulations, and Modeling (CBSM), Faculty of Engineering, University of Talca, Talca 3460000, Chile; [email protected] (A.V.-J.); [email protected] (I.D.); [email protected] (G.N.-V.) 2 Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago 8900000, Chile; [email protected] (C.P.-V.); [email protected] (L.A.); [email protected] (M.A.-A.) 3 Bioorganic Chemistry Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas y Aplicadas, Campus Nueva Granada, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Cajicá 250247, Colombia; [email protected] 4 DynaMo Center, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1017 Copenhagen, Denmark; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +56-2-230-36667 † These authors equally contributed to this work. Abstract: Plants synthesize a large number of natural products, many of which are bioactive and have practical values as well as commercial potential. To explore this vast structural diversity, we present PSC-db, a unique plant metabolite database aimed to categorize the diverse phytochemical Citation: Valdés-Jiménez, A.; space by providing 3D-structural information along with physicochemical and pharmaceutical Peña-Varas, C.; Borrego-Muñoz, P.; Arrue, L.; Alegría-Arcos, M.; properties of the most relevant natural products. PSC-db may be utilized, for example, in qualitative Nour-Eldin, H.; Dreyer, I.; estimation of biological activities (Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, QSAR) or massive Nuñez-Vivanco, G.; Ramírez, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Space, Diversity, and Complexity[Version 1; Peer Review: 2
    F1000Research 2018, 7(Chem Inf Sci):993 Last updated: 21 SEP 2021 RESEARCH ARTICLE Analysis of a large food chemical database: chemical space, diversity, and complexity [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] J. Jesús Naveja 1,2, Mariel P. Rico-Hidalgo 2, José L. Medina-Franco 2 1PECEM, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico 2Department of Pharmacy, School of Chemistry, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, 04510, Mexico v1 First published: 03 Jul 2018, 7(Chem Inf Sci):993 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15440.1 Latest published: 10 Aug 2018, 7(Chem Inf Sci):993 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15440.2 Reviewer Status Invited Reviewers Abstract Background: Food chemicals are a cornerstone in the food industry. 1 2 3 However, its chemical diversity has been explored on a limited basis, for instance, previous analysis of food-related databases were done version 2 up to 2,200 molecules. The goal of this work was to quantify the (revision) report chemical diversity of chemical compounds stored in FooDB, a 10 Aug 2018 database with nearly 24,000 food chemicals. Methods: The visual representation of the chemical space of FooDB version 1 was done with ChemMaps, a novel approach based on the concept of 03 Jul 2018 report report report chemical satellites. The large food chemical database was profiled based on physicochemical properties, molecular complexity and scaffold content. The global diversity of FoodDB was characterized 1. Piotr Minkiewicz , University of Warmia using Consensus Diversity Plots.
    [Show full text]
  • A Database of Medicinal Materials and Chemical Compounds in Northeast
    Kim et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2015) 15:218 DOI 10.1186/s12906-015-0758-5 DATABASE Open Access TM-MC: a database of medicinal materials and chemical compounds in Northeast Asian traditional medicine Sang-Kyun Kim1†, SeJin Nam2†, Hyunchul Jang1, Anna Kim1 and Jeong-Ju Lee3* Abstract Background: In traditional medicine, there has been a great deal of research on the effects exhibited by medicinal materials. To study the effects, resources that can systematically describe the chemical compounds in medicinal materials are necessary. In recent years, numerous databases on medicinal materials and constituent compounds have been constructed. However, because these databases provide differing information and the sources of such information are unclear or difficult to verify, it is difficult to decide which database to use. Moreover, there is much overlapping information. The aim of this study was to construct a database of medicinal materials and chemical compounds in Northeast Asian traditional medicine (TM-MC), for which medicinal materials are listed in the Korean, Chinese, and Japanese pharmacopoeias and information on the compound names of medicinal materials can easily be confirmed online. Description: To provide information on the chemical compounds of medicinal materials, chromatography articles from MEDLINE and PubMed Central were searched. After chemical compounds of medicinal materials were extracted by manually investigating the full-text of articles, a database of information on about 14,000 compounds from 536 medicinal materials was built. The database also provides links to the articles from which each medicinal material and chemical compound were extracted. Conclusion: TM-MC database provides information on medicinal materials and their chemical compounds from chromatography articles in MEDLINE and PubMed Central.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in Multidimensional QSAR (4D-6D): a Critical Review
    Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 2014, 14, 35-55 35 Recent Advances in Multidimensional QSAR (4D-6D): A Critical Review Manoj G. Damale1, Sanjay N. Harke1, Firoz A. Kalam Khan2, Devanand B. Shinde3 and Jaiprakash N. Sangshetti*2 1Department of Bioinformatics, MGM’s Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Aurangabad (MS) India-431003; 2Y.B. Chavan College of Pharmacy, Dr. Rafiq Zakaria Campus, Rauza Baugh, Aurangabad (MS) India-431001; 3Department of Chemical Technology, Dr. B.A.M. University, Aurangabad (MS) India-431004 Abstract: The quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) study is the most cited and reliable computational technique used for decades to obtain information about a substituent’s physicochemical property and biological activity. There is step-by-step development in the concept of QSAR from 0D to 2D. These models suffer various limitations that led to the development of 3D-QSAR. There are large numbers of literatures available on the utility of 3D-QSAR for drug design. Three-dimensional properties of molecules with non-covalent interactions are served as important tool in the selection of bioactive confirmation of compounds. With this view, 3D-QSAR has been explored with different advancements like COMFA, COMSA, COMMA, etc. Some reports are also available highlighting the limitations of 3D-QSAR. In a way, to overcome the limitations of 3D-QSAR, more advanced QSAR approaches like 4D, 5D and 6D-QSAR have been evolved. Here, in this present review we have focused more on the present and future of more predictive models of QSAR studies. The review highlights the basics of 3D to 6D-QSAR and mainly emphasizes the advantages of one dimension over the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Chembiofinder V14 User Guide
    ChemBioFinder 14.0 User Guide ChemBioFinder 14.0 Table of Contents Chapter 1: About ChemBioFinder 1 About BioViz 1 About this guide 1 Serial Number and Technical Support 2 Chapter 2: Getting Started 4 The ChemBioFinder User Interface 4 More UI features 10 Opening ChemBioFinder 11 Using ChemBioFinder with databases 11 Chapter 3: Tutorials 14 Sample databases 14 Tutorial 1: Creating forms 14 Tutorial 2: Opening a database 16 Tutorial 3: Creating a database 17 Tutorial 4: Searching a database 19 Tutorial 5: Reaction searches 22 Tutorial 6: Creating a BioViz plot 25 Tutorial 7: Working with subforms 29 Chapter 4: Forms 31 Creating forms automatically 31 Saving a form 32 Creating forms manually 33 Setting box properties 39 Editing forms 46 Chapter 5: Databases 58 Selecting a database 58 Opening databases 61 Table of Contents i ChemBioFinder 14.0 Browsing databases 63 Creating a database 69 Creating a portal database 75 Chapter 6: Working with Data 76 Entering data 76 Editing data 78 Sorting data 83 Resetting the database 84 Changing the database scheme 84 Chapter 7: Importing and Exporting Data 86 Supported file formats 86 Importing data 86 Exporting data 92 Chapter 8: Queries 96 Text searches 96 Numeric searches 97 Molecular formula searches 97 Date searches 99 Find list 99 Structure searches 100 Reaction searches 105 Combined searches 109 SQL searches 110 Query procedures 110 Refining a search 117 Special structure searches 120 Managing queries 124 Search examples 130 Chapter 9: Compound Profiles 135 Table of Contents ii ChemBioFinder 14.0
    [Show full text]
  • View and Approval by a Chemoinformatician
    Martin et al. Journal of Cheminformatics 2012, 4:11 http://www.jcheminf.com/content/4/1/11 METHODOLOGY Open Access Building an R&D chemical registration system Elyette Martin1*, Aurélien Monge1, Jacques-Antoine Duret1, Federico Gualandi2, Manuel C Peitsch1 and Pavel Pospisil1 Abstract Small molecule chemistry is of central importance to a number of R&D companies in diverse areas such as the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, food flavoring, and cosmeceutical industries. In order to store and manage thousands of chemical compounds in such an environment, we have built a state-of-the-art master chemical database with unique structure identifiers. Here, we present the concept and methodology we used to build the system that we call the Unique Compound Database (UCD). In the UCD, each molecule is registered only once (uniqueness), structures with alternative representations are entered in a uniform way (normalization), and the chemical structure drawings are recognizable to chemists and to a cartridge. In brief, structural molecules are entered as neutral entities which can be associated with a salt. The salts are listed in a dictionary and bound to the molecule with the appropriate stoichiometric coefficient in an entity called “substance”. The substances are associated with batches. Once a molecule is registered, some properties (e.g., ADMET prediction, IUPAC name, chemical properties) are calculated automatically. The UCD has both automated and manual data controls. Moreover, the UCD concept enables the management of user errors in the structure entry by reassigning or archiving the batches. It also allows updating of the records to include newly discovered properties of individual structures.
    [Show full text]