The Geomorphological and Geological Importance of Palaeosurfaces
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 2, 2021 The geomorphological and geological importance of palaeosurfaces M. WIDDOWSON Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK This Special Publication is a collection of papers cations of ancient palaeosurfaces. The research which identifies, describes, and interprets the areas represented are geographically widespread occurrence of palaeosurfaces in the geological and include examples from Australia, Africa, South record. The concept of a palaeosurface is one America, India, and Europe. which is generally understood across the geo- morphological and geological sciences but, The importance of palaeosurfaces according to discipline and application, often differs in the emphasis and detail of its This Special Publication is timely for two main interpretation. In order to encompass the widest reasons. First, in recent years geologists, range of contributions and views upon the subject geophysicists, and geomorphologists have begun of palaeosurfaces, a broad remit was deliberately to look anew at landscape evolution because adopted during the preparation of this volume. it has become increasingly apparent that the characteristics of major landscape components, Background and objectives such as palaeosurfaces, can potentially provide important clues to fundamental questions regarding Many working groups within the geological and the nature of macro-scale (i.e. tectonic) processes, geomorphological sciences share a common link and the rate and timing of uplift and erosion. Such through the Geological Society, and it is hoped an approach is evident from many recent papers that this volume will further illustrate the potential which have sought to define both uplift and erosion of cross-disciplinary study. Geology and geo- in terms of the surface expression of crustal and morphology, though often approached by different mantle dynamics (e.g. McKenzie 1984; England & research schools, are both expressions of complex Houseman 1988; England & Molnar 1990; Cox Earth systems and as such can rarely be treated 1989; Watts & Cox 1989; Gilchrist & Summerfield independently. Since the investigation of palaeo- 1994; Brown et al. 1994b; Povey et al. 1994; Sttiwe surfaces requires an understanding of both et al. 1994; Burbank et al. 1996): Second, there has geomorphological and geological processes, their been common recognition of the benefit of a more study is clearly a theme which demands this type of unified treatment of both landscape evolution and cross-disciplinary approach. Therefore, the aim of sediment deposition systems. The development of this volume is to bring together expertise from a this latter approach has been greatly assisted by the variety of fields by researchers in both the advent of advanced computer modelling which has geological and geomorphological disciplines who allowed calculation of macro-scale erosion and have adopted such a combined approach to sedimentation budgets. As a consequence, the palaeosurface research. dynamics of landscape erosion, fluvial systems, and Contributions have been encouraged from the associated stratigraphical evolution of sedimentary fields of geomorphology, geology, geochemistry, basins, so long treated as independent research palynology and palaeoenvironmental studies. The themes within geomorphology and geology, are papers include studies of geomorphological now being considered in a more unifed approach evolution, reconstruction of palaeolandscapes, (e.g. Brown et al. 1990; Schlager 1993; Whiting lateritization and bauxitization, palaeo-karstifi- et al. 1994; Burgess & Allen 1996; Widdowson & cation, sequence stratigraphy, geochemistry of rock Cox 1996). Clearly, future dialogue and exchange alteration, the preservation of palaeosurface between the different working groups will provide elements in both glaciated and sub-tropical regions, a basis for fashioning an increasingly holistic and the use of palaeosurfaces as an indicator of treatment of the processes acting both upon and regional-scale neotectonic deformation. More- beneath the Earth's surface. However, there over, many incorporate discussion regarding remains great potential for exploring the interaction fundamental aspects of evolution, interpretation, between tectonics and long-term landscape reconstruction, and palaeoenvironmental impli- evolution; the great antiquity and lateral extent of From Widdowson, M. (ed.), 1997, Palaeosurfaces: Recognition, Reconstruction and Palaeoenvironmental Interpretation, Geological Society Special Publication No. 120, pp. 1-12. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 2, 2021 2 M. WIDDOWSON many palaeosurfaces can provide a suitable spatial horizon of demonstrable antiquity. Within a and temporal framework for evaluating the link geological context, the importance of identifying between tectonic processes and their effect upon ancient surfaces in the rock record has long been the development of geomorphological components recognized since they are often employed to divide and associated erosional-depositional systems. stratigraphies (or other lithological or pedological Such a treatment is desirable since it has the units) into genetically and temporally related potential to reveal information about fundamental packages. Such geological surfaces often result mechanisms acting deep within the Earth, and to from fundamental changes or hiatuses in deposition make a valuable contribution to our understanding processes influenced by factors including tectonism of how the landscapes, and the processes acting or environmental change. Alternatively, they may upon them, function over long time scales. be related both directly or indirectly to changes in the nature or rate of geomorphological processes which have the potential to alter or interrupt the established pattern of stratigraphical development. What is a palaeosurface? Some ideas Historically there has existed an often subtle, but It is evident from the papers submitted for this nevertheless fundamental difference in the way in volume that the concept of palaeosurfaces which the term has been employed by geologists encompasses a wide range of geological and and geomorphologists. It can be held that this geomorphological phenomena. This makes difficult difference of research perspective arises from the any attempt to provide a palaeosurface definition manner in which the two disciplines view the which readily encompasses all areas of study. One ancient record. Within the geological sciences the fundamental distinction which can be made, term appears to have attained a rather wide however, is the difference between exogenic and interpretation because geologists tend to view Earth endogenic surfaces: Exogenic processes act upon surface systems in a depositional or constructive the Earth's exposed surface and include the (endogenic) framework and therefore consider a action of ice, wind, water, and biota which result whole variety of surface types, whether they be in denudation and a net reduction in elevation. formed by erosion or other forms of depositional Clearly, many identified palaeosurfaces have gaps (i.e. unconformities), as an integral and evolved largely as the result the exogenic fundamental part of the stratigraphical record. geomorphological agents of weathering and Consequently, the term has been employed to erosion. However, there exist other types of describe surfaces preserved in both sub-aerial surfaces which are demonstrably of an endogenic and sub-aqueous sequences and it therefore origin. These include constructional processes, encompasses a variety of features originating from often of geological origin, such as those resulting a range of erosional and depositional processes from crustal uplift (i.e. orogenic and epeirogenic), (e.g. unconformity surfaces arising from the and igneous activity (e.g. surface volcanic erosion and removal of strata, breaks in structures and surface doming by magmatic sedimentation, or other fundamental changes in injection). Since endogenic examples are typically deposition or deposition rates, for instance). constructional in nature they tend to be associated However, it is evident geomorphologists often with an increase in elevation of relief. Good consider the ancient record in an essentially examples include those resulting from epeiro- destructive (exogenic) framework, since their genesis (a broad uplift of the crust resulting from work is primarily concerned with the processes thermal or dynamic processes within the Earth), of weathering and erosion; these being the two examples arising from the structural effects of main factors which determine the evolution of faulting and folding in regions of tectonic landforms. Geomorphologically speaking, the convergence, or those of a volcanogenic derivation palaeosurface concept involves features, typically such as lava fields. Nevertheless, it is important to within a palaeolandscape framework, which are realize that in the ancient record pure endogenic characteristically erosional and usually, though not surfaces may be uncommon, for unless these exclusively, sub-aerial in origin. Consequently, the endogenic surfaces rapidly become covered and term is commonly accepted as being something effectively fossilized by younger materials an much more specific and complex than the rather increasingly important exogenic contribution to generic 'ancient surface' definition suggested surface morphology will