Standing Committee on Central Conference Matters the GENERAL CONFERENCE of the UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
843504028428_008.qxp:QK001A.qxd 1/24/12 5:02 PM Page 1195 DCA Advance Edition Standing Committee on Central Conference Matters THE GENERAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Volume 2 Nashville, Tennessee Standing Committee on Central Conference Matters Report to the 2012 General Conference The Standing Committee on Central Conference be responsible for presenting legislation to the 2012 Matters was redesigned by the 2008 General General Conference. Conference. Par. 2201 of the 2008 United Methodist Much work was able to be achieved in the two Book of Discipline defines the standing committee. It meetings in Nashville and Kinshasa thanks to the allows the committee for the first time in its existence to prayerful and cooperative spirit among the members. meet not only during General Conference but also to The General Board of Global Ministries and the General hold two meetings during the quadrennium: “. The Council on Finance and Administration gave excellent standing committee shall meet twice within the quadren- staff support to the officers and the committee. The work nium in order to review, consider, and develop resolu- accomplished gives a much better overview of the very tions and petitions related to central conferences and diverse situations in the central conferences. Documen- may be called into session during General Conference tation with geographical maps, statistics on the countries as needed . .” (Par. 2201.2). Beside meetings at the and the ministry of The United Methodist Church in the 2008 General Conference, it met in October 2009 in central conferences, as well as short historical sum- Nashville, Tennessee, USA, and in February 2011 in maries, are available for all central conferences in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, each time for Africa, Asia, and Europe. They can be downloaded from 3-4 days. The 2008 General Conference referred several www.gcfa.org/gc2012. All delegates are encouraged to petitions concerning the creation of new episcopal areas review these very informative documents. in central conferences to the standing committee. The officers met regularly in order to prepare the meetings One of the main tasks given by the 2008 General and plan the process for moving forward. Conference to the standing committee related to peti- tions to establish new episcopal areas in central confer- In its meeting in October 2009, the members shared ences. In an effort to establish evaluation guidelines, the insights and challenges about the mission and ministry standing committee developed a policy with measurable of The United Methodist Church in each central confer- criteria adapted to the specific challenges in central con- ence. They collected concerns and tasks for the work of the committee and assigned them to three task groups: ferences. It did not simply adopt the criteria used in episcopal areas, central conferences, and General jurisdictional conferences in the United States, which Conference. Each group received tasks in preparation are based primarily on church membership. for the second meeting in February 2011 where deci- sions were made about the petitions referred from the The criteria, in order of importance, are proposed to 2008 General Conference and new petitions for submis- be as follows: sion to the 2012 General Conference. As par. 2201 is written in the current Book of Discipline, the standing (1) the number of charge conferences and the num- committee completed its work with its meeting in ber of active clergy in episcopal areas; February 2011. A standing committee with a new mem- (2) the geographic size of episcopal areas, meas- bership convenes immediately prior to the full session of ured by the square miles/square kilometers and the num- the 2012 General Conference. This new committee will ber of time zones and nations; 1195 843504028428_008.qxp:QK001A.qxd 1/24/12 5:02 PM Page 1196 1196 DCA Advance Edition (3) the structure of episcopal areas, measured by the the quadrennium and present and act on its own petitions number of annual conferences, and the overall church and recommendations to the following General membership in all annual, provisional annual, missionary Conference. This would allow for more continuity conferences, and missions in episcopal areas. between the work during the quadrennium and its pres- entation to the next General Conference. Following the application of these three criteria, the standing committee would then conduct a further analy- The standing committee also considered research sis of the context and missional potential of changes in and developed legislation concerning provisional annual episcopal areas. conferences. Provisional annual conferences are created within central conferences because of specific needs, but The report on criteria for the change in episcopal have not the size needed to be annual conferences. In the areas in central conferences (see Appendix, 1) explains past, they have sometimes been created by General the work of the standing committee in this regard in Conference and sometimes by central conferences greater detail. The standing committee submits the relat- because of conflicting language in the current Book of ed petition to change Par. 404.1 of the 2008 United Discipline. Following a decision of the Judicial Council Methodist Book of Discipline based on these proposed (Decision 1180), the standing committee developed leg- criteria. islation seeking to allow central conferences to create provisional annual conferences, and at the same time Using the criteria selected, the standing committee seeking to reduce the number of delegates to central unanimously voted to seek a fourth episcopal area in the conferences from provisional annual conferences by one Congo Central Conference. It clearly established the lay and one clergy delegate and seeking to give a provi- sional annual conference the right to elect one delegate greatest need in the present Central Congo Episcopal to a General Conference with all rights and privileges of Area. It also rejected all other requests for additional other delegates from annual conferences except the right episcopal areas referred to the standing committee from to vote. the 2008 General Conference or during the quadrenni- um. Those included requests for new episcopal areas in It is the information of the standing committee that, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Mozambique, the Philippines, after intensive research, the secretary of General two in South Congo, and Burundi. All future requests for Conference, in cooperation with the officers of the a new episcopal area would be evaluated using the crite- standing committee, plans to submit a petition seeking ria and the analysis of the context and missional poten- to recognize all provisional annual conferences that sent tial of changes in episcopal areas. delegates to the 2008 General Conference, but had never been created by an act of a prior General Conference. The standing committee received and recommend- ed a discussion paper on the role of a bishop. It was In the deliberations of the standing committee in shared with the Council of Bishops, the Committee on Nashville and in Kinshasa, members highlighted a num- Faith and Order, the Study on Ministry, and the Study ber of issues around the structure and work of central Committee on the Worldwide Nature of the Church. It conferences. A careful examination of current practice can be downloaded at www.gcfa.org/gc2012. and conditions shows that some central conferences in many parts of the world lack the capacity to function The standing committee also dealt with a number of according to their intended mandate. Time did not allow issues related to the boundaries of central conferences, for deeper conversation about more effective and effi- and the number and status of annual and provisional cient structures, about numbers and boundaries of cen- annual conferences within central conferences. The tral conferences, and about new creative ways to standing committee is submitting petitions on these and structure the work of The United Methodist Church out- related topics to the General Conference. side the United States in order to fulfill its mission and ministry in ways that are the most efficient. The stand- The standing committee also evaluated its own effi- ing committee is willing to look at these issues in the ciencies and structure during the quadrennium. The new quadrennium, to open a conversation with the cen- standing committee proposes that its new membership tral conferences at standing committee meetings during be convened not immediately prior to the opening, but at the 2013-2016 quadrennium and to bring proposals to the close, of a General Conference and then act through the 2016 General Conference. 843504028428_008.qxp:QK001A.qxd 1/24/12 5:02 PM Page 1197 Standing Committee on Central Conference Matters 1197 Members of the Standing Committee on Central Conference Matters Patrick Streiff, Chair Minerva Carcaño, Vice Chair Byrd Bonner, Secretary Istvan Ambrusz, Hungary Sergei Nikolaev, Russia Daniel Arichea, Jr., Philippines Margaret Novak, Montana Charlene Black, Georgia Marc Nussbaumer, Switzerland Charles Boayue, Michigan Solomon Olusiyi, Nigeria Benjamin Boni, Cote D’Ivoire Oystein Olsen, Sweden Byrd Bonner, Texas Johann Osias, Guam Minerva Carcaño, Arizona Bruce Ough, Ohio Phebe Crismo, Philippines Werner Philipp, Germany Emily DeSalvatore, New York Jose Quipungo, Angola Elisabeth Englund, Sweden John A. Redmond, South Carolina Christine Flick, Germany Ann B. Sherer-Simpson,