The Impact of Climate on Surging at Donjek Glacier
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-72 Manuscript under review for journal The Cryosphere Discussion started: 17 April 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. 1 The Impact of Climate on Surging at Donjek Glacier, Yukon, Canada 2 3 William Kochtitzky1,2, Dominic Winski1,2, Erin McConnell1,2, Karl Kreutz1,2, Seth Campbell1,2, 4 Ellyn M. Enderlin1,2,3, Luke Copland4, Scott Williamson4, Brittany Main4, Christine Dow5, 5 Hester Jiskoot6 6 7 1School of Earth and Climate Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA 8 2Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA 9 3Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA 10 4Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, 11 Canada 12 5Department of Geography and Environmental Management, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, 13 ON, Canada 14 6Department of Geography, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada 15 16 Correspondence to: William Kochtitzky ([email protected]) 17 Abstract. Links between climate and glacier surges are not well understood, but are required to 18 enable prediction of glacier surges and mitigation of associated hazards. Here, we investigate the 19 role of snow accumulation and temperature on surge periodicity, glacier area changes, and 20 timing of surge initiation since the 1930s for Donjek Glacier, Yukon, Canada. Snow 21 accumulation measured in three ice cores collected at Eclipse Icefield, at the head of the glacier, 22 indicate that a cumulative accumulation of 13.1-17.7 m w.e. of snow occurred in the 10-12 years 23 between each of its last eight surges. This suggests that a cumulative accumulation threshold 24 must be passed before the initiation of a surge event, although it remains unclear whether the 25 relationship between cumulative snowfall and surging is due to the consistency in repeat surge 26 interval and decadal average precipitation, or if it is indeed a prerequisite to surging. We also 27 examined the 1968 to 2017 climate record from Burwash Landing, 30 km from the glacier, to 28 determine whether a relationship exists between surge periodicity and an increase of 2.5°C in 29 mean annual air temperature over this period. No such relationship was found, although each of 30 the past 8 surge events has been less extensive than the previous, with the terminus area 31 approximately 7.96 km2 smaller after the 2012-2014 surge event compared to the ~1947 surge 32 event. This study shows that the impacts of climate and surging is not yet understood and 33 suggests that internal glacier processes may play a more important role in controlling glacier 34 surge events. 35 36 1. Introduction 1 The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-72 Manuscript under review for journal The Cryosphere Discussion started: 17 April 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. 37 Surge-type glaciers account for ~1% of glaciers globally (Sevestre and Benn, 2015), but can be 38 the dominant glacier type in some regions (e.g., Clarke et al., 1986; Jiskoot et al., 2003), and are 39 important for understanding ice flow instabilities and anomalous glacier response to climate 40 change (Yde and Paasche, 2010). Surge-type glaciers have long periods of flow at rates below 41 their balance velocity (quiescent phase), typically on the order of decades, which are interrupted 42 by short-lived phases of glacier flow at rates much higher than the balance velocity (active phase 43 or surge phase), typically on the order of months to years, that are driven by internal instabilities 44 and sometimes lead to a marked frontal advance (Meier and Post, 1969; Clarke, 1987). When a 45 glacier surges, its reservoir zone at higher elevations loses mass and its receiving zone at lower 46 elevations gains mass, with the line of zero net mass change defined as the dynamic balance line 47 (DBL: Dolgoushin and Osipova, 1975). When mass gain in the receiving zone leads to a 48 significant advance of the terminus, an increased calving flux or other proglacial hazards can 49 occur. 50 Surges of temperate glaciers are typically hypothesized to initiate when a critical basal 51 shear stress is reached in a surge initiation region, causing the subglacial hydrologic system to 52 reorganize and the glacier to rapidly redistribute its accumulated mass down-glacier (Meier and 53 Post, 1969; Raymond, 1987; Eisen et al., 2005). While this hydrologic mechanism dominates 54 Yukon-Alaska type surging, a thermal triggering mechanism (i.e., surging controlled by basal ice 55 temperature), or combined hydro-thermodynamic mechanism, has been documented in surges of 56 polar and polythermal glaciers, such as those in Svalbard and smaller glaciers in Yukon-Alaska 57 (Murray et al., 2003; Frappé and Clarke, 2007; De Paoli and Flowers, 2009; Dunse et al., 2015). 58 Finally, overarching theories related to balance flux (Budd, 1975) and enthalpy (Sevestre et al., 59 2015) have been proposed as well. 60 The length of a surge cycle (i.e., combined quiescent and active phases) is typically 61 consistent for an individual glacier, and is proportional to the length of the surge phase (Meier 62 and Post, 1969; Dowdeswell and others, 1991). In turn, quiescence duration is controlled by 63 mass balance conditions (Robin and Weertman, 1973), meaning that surge periodicity is 64 inversely related to accumulation rates (Dyurgerov et al., 1985; Osipova and Tsvetkov, 1991; 65 Dowdeswell et al., 1991). Prolonged quiescent phases (decades to centuries) typical of the 66 Svalbard region have been ascribed to low accumulation rates, often only on the order of 0.3-0.6 67 m a-1 (Dowdeswell et al., 1995), while short repeat intervals (12-20 years) on Variegated Glacier, 2 The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-72 Manuscript under review for journal The Cryosphere Discussion started: 17 April 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. 68 AK, correspond to accumulation rates on the order of 1.4 m a-1 (Eisen et al., 2001; Van Geffen 69 and Oerlemans, 2017). However, there can be large variations in surge periodicity between 70 glaciers in the same region. For example, Icelandic glaciers have irregular quiescent intervals, 5- 71 30 years for some glaciers and up to 100-140 for others (Björnsson et al., 2003: Sigurdsson, 72 2005). 73 Changes in surge recurrence interval has been linked to changing cumulative mass 74 balance (Dowdeswell et al., 1995; Copland et al., 2011; Eisen et al., 2001; Striberger et al., 75 2011). Dowdeswell et al. (1995) found a persistent negative mass balance reduced the glacier 76 surge activity in Svalbard. Conversely, an increase in precipitation and positive glacier mass 77 balance on Karakoram glaciers is associated with an elevated number of surge events, although it 78 is unclear whether the increase in accumulation (Copland et al., 2011) or increase in intense 79 short-term melting periods Hewitt (2007) drove the increase in surging. Eisen et al. (2001) 80 reported a variable surge recurrence interval that was consistent with changing amounts of 81 precipitation on Variegated Glacier, Alaska. Similarly, Striberger et al. (2011) found a variable 82 surge repeat interval at Eyjabakkajökull, Iceland associated with changes in climatically-driven 83 mass balance. 84 Previous efforts to examine connections between cumulative snow accumulation and 85 length of the quiescent phase have used mass balance models, off-ice meteorological 86 measurements, and a limited record of in situ mass balance measurements (Eisen et al., 2001; 87 Tangborn, 2013; Dyurgerov et al., 1985). Although these studies found that a snow accumulation 88 threshold had to be reached before each surge started, this potential linkage has not yet been 89 tested with observations of glacier surface mass balance. Here, we use the well-documented 90 history of surge events at Donjek Glacier (Abe et al., 2016; Kochtitzky et al., In Review; Fig. 1), 91 and ice cores extracted from Eclipse Icefield at the head of the glacier (Wake et al., 2002; Yalcin 92 et al., 2006; Kelsey et al., 2012), to explore linkages between snow accumulation and surging 93 since the 1930s. We combine these observations with weather station records, digital elevation 94 models, and remote sensing analysis to examine the impacts of climate and ice kinematics on 95 surge behavior. The combination of data from eight surge events and three independent ice core 96 records in the accumulation zone, make Donjek Glacier an ideal site to test the influence of 97 climate on surge behavior. 3 The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-72 Manuscript under review for journal The Cryosphere Discussion started: 17 April 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. 98 99 Figure 1. (a) Donjek Glacier (blue outline; RGI Consortium, 2017), with Eclipse Icefield marked 100 with the yellow star and Donjek River in light blue. Black line indicates the separation between 101 the downglacier surge-type and upglacier non-surge-type portions of the glacier. Green box 102 indicates extent of Figure 7a. (b) Location of Donjek Glacier in southwestern Yukon; red box 103 indicates extent of a. Base image from Landsat 8, 23 September, 2017. 104 105 2. Study Site 106 Donjek Glacier (61°11'N, 139°31'W; Figure 1) is a surge-type glacier located in southwest 107 Yukon in the St. Elias Mountains. In 2010, Donjek Glacier was 65 km long with a surface area 108 of 448 km2 (RGI Consortium, 2017). While the Tlingit indigenous peoples of the Yukon were 109 the first to observe Donjek Glacier surge (Cruikshank, 1981), the first scientific records are from 110 1937 in the form of Bradford Washburn’s air photos (https://library.uaf.edu/washburn/).