A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Idebenone in Friedreich Ataxia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CLINICAL TRIALS SECTION EDITOR: IRA SHOULSON, MD A Phase 3, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Idebenone in Friedreich Ataxia David R. Lynch, MD, PhD; Susan L. Perlman, MD; Thomas Meier, PhD Objective: To assess the efficacy of idebenone on neu- (FARS) score, performance measures, and activities of rological function in patients with Friedreich ataxia. daily living were the secondary efficacy variables. Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo- Results: Patients who received idebenone improved by controlled intervention trial. 2.5 points on mean ICARS score compared with base- line, while patients in the placebo group improved by 1.3 Setting: Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the Uni- points. Patients who took idebenone also improved by versity of California at Los Angeles. 1.6 points on the FARS, while patients taking placebo de- clined by 0.6 points. For both end points, the difference Participants: Seventy ambulatory pediatric patients (age, between the idebenone and placebo groups was not sta- 8-18 years) with a baseline International Cooperative tistically different. Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) score of 10 to 54. Conclusions: Idebenone did not significantly alter neu- Interventions: Participants were randomized into 1 of rological function in Friedreich ataxia during the 6-month 3 treatment arms: 450 or 900 mg of idebenone per day study. Larger studies of longer duration may be needed (in those with a body weight Յ or Ͼ45 kg, respectively; to assess the therapeutic potential of drug candidates on n=22); 1350 or 2250 mg of idebenone per day (n=24); neurological function in Friedreich ataxia. or placebo (n=24). Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: Main Outcome Measures: Mean change from base- NCT00537680 line to week 24 in ICARS score was the primary efficacy variable. Mean change in Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale Arch Neurol. 2010;67(8):941-947 RIEDREICH ATAXIA IS AN AU- the mitochondrial electron transport chain, tosomal recessive degenera- increasing the production of adenosine tri- tive disorder characterized by phosphate.8 In Friedreich ataxia, idebe- ataxia, areflexia, sensory loss, none may decrease cardiac hypertrophy and weakness, scoliosis, and car- improve cardiac function, with beneficial ef- diomyopathy. Diabetes mellitus, optic neu- fects observed at dose levels of 5 mg/kg per F 1,2 9-13 ropathy, and hearing loss are also seen. day. Data on neurological effects at this Most patients with Friedreich ataxia (97%) dose level are inconsistent.9-13 A 6-month, have expansions of a GAA repeat in the first double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 intron on both alleles of the gene encoding clinical trial (National Institutes of Health the mitochondrial protein frataxin,2,3 whose [NIH] Collaboration With Santhera in 4 Author Affiliations: expression is reduced in Friedreich ataxia. Ataxia [NICOSIA]) using higher doses of Departments of Neurology The size of the GAA-repeat expansion in- idebenone showed evidence of dose- and Pediatrics, University versely correlates with frataxin expression dependent improvement in secondary of Pennsylvania School and age at disease onset.3 Deficiency of fra- neurological end points compared with pla- of Medicine, and The Children’s taxin in cells leads to decreased activities of cebo.14 This was best noted on the Interna- Hospital of Philadelphia, iron-sulfur cluster–containing enzymes, ac- tional Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale Philadelphia (Dr Lynch); cumulation of iron in the mitochondrial ma- (ICARS), with a similar pattern observed for Department of Neurology, trix, increased sensitivity to oxidative stress, the Activities of Daily Living and neuro- David Geffen School and impaired adenosine triphosphate pro- logical scales of the Friedreich’s Ataxia Rat- of Medicine, University 5-7 of California at Los Angeles, duction. ing Scale (FARS). Neurological improve- Los Angeles (Dr Perlman); and Idebenone, a synthetic analogue of co- ment was especially evident in ambulatory Santhera Pharmaceuticals, enzyme Q10, has potent antioxidant activ- patients with ICARS scores of 10 to 54 at Liestal, Switzerland (Dr Meier). ity and facilitates the flux of electrons along baseline. The trend to improvement was (REPRINTED) ARCH NEUROL / VOL 67 (NO. 8), AUG 2010 WWW.ARCHNEUROL.COM 941 ©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/29/2021 vided as prepackaged kits marked with the appropriate treat- ment number. Group A received idebenone (150-mg idebe- 74 Screened 4 Excluded none tablets, Catena, Santhera Pharmaceuticals) at 450 mg per 3 ICARS score > 54 day (if Յ45-kg body weight at baseline) or 900 mg per day (if 1 Elevated liver Ͼ45-kg body weight at baseline); group B received idebenone function test result Յ Ͼ 70 Randomized at 1350 mg per day (if 45 kg) or 2250 mg per day (if 45 kg); and group C received placebo. These dosages correspond Center 1 Center 2 to doses in the range of approximately 10 to 20 mg/kg per day 12 Received placebo 12 Received placebo 11 Received 450 or 900 11 Received 450 or 900 (group A) and approximately 30 to 54 mg/kg per day (group mg/d of idebenone Allocation mg/d of idebenone B) for patients weighing 25 to 80 kg within each dose group. 12 Received 1350 or 2250 12 Received 1350 or 2250 The drug was administered in 3 divided doses with meals. mg/d of idebenone mg/d of idebenone 35 Completed treatment Follow-up 35 Completed treatment STUDY CONDUCT 35 Analyzed Analysis 35 Analyzed Within 8 weeks prior to randomization (at the baseline visit), pa- tients attended a screening visit where informed consent/assent was obtained and inclusion/exclusion criteria were assessed. They Figure 1. Participant flow diagram. ICARS indicates International underwent a physical and neurological examination, including Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale. an assessment of vital signs and electrocardiography, and a preg- nancy test for female patients of childbearing potential. Thereaf- only evident at idebenone doses approximately 3- to 10- ter, neurological efficacy assessments were undertaken at base- fold higher than the previously used daily 5-mg/kg dose. line (day 1) and weeks 12 and 24 (end of therapy). Safety The present study, Idebenone Effects on Neurological assessments were performed at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 28 (follow- ICARS Assessments (IONIA), is a double-blind, random- up); no follow-up visit was undertaken in patients who enrolled ized, placebo-controlled intervention trial of 6 months’ du- into the open-label extension. Patients maintained a diary, with daily documentation of study medication intake and recording ration evaluating the safety and efficacy on neurological of adverse events and concomitant medications. function of idebenone in ambulatory pediatric patients with Friedreich ataxia. OUTCOME MEASURES AND OBJECTIVES METHODS The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of 24 weeks’ treatment with 2 different doses of idebenone with that of pla- STUDY DESIGN cebo on neurological impairment as assessed by the ICARS. Sec- ondary measures included the neurological examination of the The study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo- FARS; the Friedreich’s Ataxia Composite Test (FACT-Z3), de- controlled, parallel-group study investigating the safety, toler- rived from the Timed 25-Foot Walk test, the 9-hole peg test, ability, and efficacy of idebenone in the treatment of patients and the low-contrast letter acuity test; and the activities of daily with Friedreich ataxia conducted at 2 centers: Children’s Hos- living scale.15-18 pital of Philadelphia and the University of California at Los An- geles. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of Friedreich ataxia STATISTICAL ANALYSIS with confirmed GAA-expansion mutations (patients having point mutations were not eligible); age older than 7 and younger than The primary and secondary efficacy analyses were conducted 18 years at baseline evaluation; body weight above 25 kg; and in the intent-to-treat population, including all randomized pa- ability to walk at least 10 m without an accompanying person tients. The patients were analyzed as randomized regardless of (ICARS Walking Capacities score Յ6). Patients were ex- protocol deviations. The last observation carried forward method cluded if they had an ICARS score greater than 54 or less than was applied to impute missing data. Safety analysis included 10 at screening; were pregnant or breastfeeding; had clinically all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of the trial significant abnormalities of hematology or biochemistry; or had medication and for whom safety assessments were available. participated in the previous phase 2 trial of idebenone.14 Pa- Unless specified, efficacy analyses for each group receiving tients being treated at screening with antioxidants (vitamin E, idebenone were compared against the placebo group using pair- coenzyme Q, and idebenone purchased from noncontrolled wise comparison based on an analysis of covariance model, with sources) were required to have a 1-month washout of these treatment as a factor and baseline value as a covariate testing a agents before the baseline visit. 2-sided alternative at a Bonferroni-adjusted ␣ level of 2.5%. With a minimum of 15 evaluable patients in each of the groups, an RANDOMIZATION anticipated effect size (difference between placebo and idebe- none) of more than 6.2 ICARS points, and a common SD of Of 74 patients who were screened, 4 did not qualify for enroll- 5.0 points, the study would provide 85% power to reject the ment (3 patients had ICARS scores Ͼ54 and 1 patient had an null hypothesis of no difference between any idebenone dose abnormal liver function test result) (Figure 1). Seventy pa- and placebo with regard to the change from baseline to week tients were randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of 3 treatment arms using a 24 in ICARS using a pairwise comparison test. This effect size central block randomization scheme. A list of randomization is based on results from subgroup analysis of NICOSIA14 and numbers and corresponding treatment numbers was com- is greater than the expected yearly decline in ICARS score for puter generated by a third party (Fischer Services, Allschwil, patients with Friedrich ataxia.