Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic of Bupropion: Integrative Overview of Relevant Clinical and Forensic Aspects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic of Bupropion: Integrative Overview of Relevant Clinical and Forensic Aspects Drug Metabolism Reviews ISSN: 0360-2532 (Print) 1097-9883 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/idmr20 Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic of bupropion: integrative overview of relevant clinical and forensic aspects Rafaela Costa, Nuno G. Oliveira & Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira To cite this article: Rafaela Costa, Nuno G. Oliveira & Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira (2019): Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic of bupropion: integrative overview of relevant clinical and forensic aspects, Drug Metabolism Reviews, DOI: 10.1080/03602532.2019.1620763 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2019.1620763 Accepted author version posted online: 24 May 2019. Published online: 14 Jun 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 35 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=idmr20 DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS https://doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2019.1620763 REVIEW ARTICLE Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic of bupropion: integrative overview of relevant clinical and forensic aspects Rafaela Costaa, Nuno G. Oliveirab and Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveiraa,c,d aDepartment of Public Health and Forensic Sciences, and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; bResearch Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; cUCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; dIINFACTS – Institute of Research and Advanced Training in Health Sciences and Technologies, Department of Sciences, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, CRL, Gandra, Portugal ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Bupropion is an atypical antidepressant of the aminoketone group, structurally related to cathi- Received 15 February 2019 none, associated with a wide interindividual variability. An extensive pharmacokinetic and phar- Accepted 15 May 2019 macodynamic review of bupropion was performed, also focusing on chemical, pharmacological, KEYWORDS toxicological, clinical and forensic aspects of this drug without a limiting period. Bupropion is a Bupropion; pharmacokinet- chiral, basic, highly lipophilic drug, clinically used as racemate that undergoes extensive stereo- ics; metabolism; selective metabolism. Its major active metabolites, hydroxybupropion, threohydrobupropion, and pharmacodynamics; poly- erythrohydrobupropion reach higher plasma concentrations than bupropion. Bupropion exerts its morphisms; forensic and effects mainly by inhibiting dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake and by blocking several nic- clinical aspects otinic receptors. Recent reports highlight recreational use of bupropion via intranasal insufflation and intravenous use. Seizures, insomnia, agitation, headache, dry mouth, and nausea are some of the reported adverse effects. Neurologic effects are major signs of intoxication that should be carefully managed. Finally, the characterization of the polymorphic enzymes involved in the metabolism of bupropion is essential to understand factors that may influence the interindividual and intraindividual variability in bupropion metabolite exposure, including the evaluation of potential drug–drug interactions and pharmacogenetic implications. Introduction Bupropion (synonym: amfebutamone; (± or rac)- 2-(tert-butylamino)-3’chloropropiophenone; 1-(3-chlor- According to the World Health Organization, depressive ophenyl)-2-[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)]-propan-1-one; disorders are the single largest contributors to global tert disability, as shown by 7.5% of all Years Lived with 2-( -butylamino)-1-(3-chlorophenyl)propan-1-one) Disability (World Health Organization 2017). Depression was first described in 1969 (Mehta 1969) and then is also the major contributor to suicide. Antidepressants approved in 1985 by US Food and Drug Administration and/or psychotherapy are clinical approaches for the (FDA) as a major depressive disorder treatment, with a treatment of major depressive disorders. There are sev- maximum dose of 900 mg/d. Due to high incidence of eral classes of antidepressants: monoamine oxidase seizures in bulimic patients, bupropion was subse- inhibitors (MAOIs; e.g. phenelzine), tricyclic antidepres- quently withdrawn from the market (Horne et al. 1988). sants (e.g. desipramine), selective serotonin reuptake Further studies evidenced that the seizure risk was inhibitors (SSRIs; e.g. fluoxetine), serotonin and norepin- dose-dependent and bupropion was reintroduced in ephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs; e.g. venlafaxine), the market with a maximum dose of 450 mg/d and con- and the atypical antidepressants (i.e. drugs that act by a traindicated for patients with increased risk of seizures mechanism of action other than the previously men- (Davidson 1989). Besides this immediate release (IR) for- tioned; e.g. bupropion). Even though the adverse mulation, delayed-release dosages by the administra- effects, safety and tolerability profile of antidepressants tion of sustained release (SR) and extended release (XL) vary widely between classes, the efficacy of different formulations are also available in order to maintain sta- classes of antidepressants is similar. ble plasmatic concentrations for a specific period of CONTACT Rafaela Costa [email protected]; Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira [email protected], [email protected] Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences, and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal ß 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2 R. COSTA ET AL. time with minimum side effects (Jefferson et al. 2005). Additional reports were obtained from the references Bupropion sustained release formulation was approved of the articles identified in the original search. alone or in combination with transdermal nicotine for VR the treatment of smoking cessation (Zyban ), whether Chemical structure and formulation or not a smoker was depressed (Hurt et al. 1997), and when combined with naltrexone for the treatment of The cathinone has a phenylalkylamine structure and is obesity (Yanovski and Yanovski 2015; Saunders et al. the main psychoactive naturally occurring alkaloid Catha edulis 2016). Bupropion extended release formulations were found in the leaves of the plant, commonly approved for the treatment of seasonal affective dis- known as khat (Marinetti and Antonides 2013; order (Niemegeers et al. 2013). Other off-label uses illus- Watterson and Olive 2014). Structural modifications trate the multifaceted therapeutic potential of of the cathinone core originate several compounds, bupropion for the treatment of the attention-deficit/ known as synthetic cathinones. In view of their chem- ical resemblance with amphetamines and due to the hyperactivity disorder (Wilens et al. 2005) and the psy- presence of the beta-ketone group at the b-position of choactive substance dependence, namely metham- the side chain, synthetic cathinones are often termed phetamine dependence (Charntikov et al. 2018). At the “bk-amphetamines” or “b-keto amphetamines” (Kelly pharmacodynamic level, bupropion is a noradrenaline 2011; Prosser and Nelson 2012; Miller et al. 2017; and dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI) but also acts Valento and Lebin 2017). Synthetic cathinones are less as a non-competitive inhibitor of nicotine a b receptor 4 2 lipophilic than amphetamines due to the increased and by allosteric blockade of the 5-hydroxytryptamine polarity added by the b-keto moiety. Functional group (5-HT) receptors (Pandhare et al. 2017). 3A substitutions to the core structure of the parent cathi- In view of the relevance of bupropion in the clinical none compound (Figure 1) have yielded a large number and forensic context, an extensive knowledge on of synthetic cathinones, which can be separated into ’ bupropion s chemistry, pharmacokinetics, and pharma- four different chemical families based on the substitu- codynamics is crucial to maximize its clinical efficacy tions made (Valente et al. 2014; Miller et al. 2017; and predict its tolerability and safety profile when deal- Nobrega and Dinis-Oliveira 2018). Many synthetic cathi- ing with intoxications. This approach has also been par- nones (e.g. methcathinone and diethylpropion) were ticularly useful to explain clinical and forensic outcomes initially synthetized for medical purposes (e.g. anti- of different xenobiotics (Barbosa et al. 2016; Dinis- depressant and appetite suppressant, respectively). Oliveira 2016a, 2016b, 2017a, 2017b, 2017c). Further However, they were withdrawn from the market due to information on the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity its psychostimulant effects and abuse liability (Kelly data available for bupropion is also included herewith. 2011). Bupropion (Figure 1), a member of the N-alky- Overall, this work aims to provide a comprehensive lated cathinone group, is the only synthetic derivative review of the current data regarding the chemical, currently used in the clinical setting. Bupropion is a pharmacological, toxicological and forensic aspects monocyclic phenylaminoketone compound that of bupropion. besides the core structure of the parent drug has a tert- butyl moiety attached to the amine group and a chlor- ine group attached to the position 3’ of the aromatic Methodology ring. Both the phenyl ring substitution and the size and An exhaustive search was made in PubMed concerning branching of the N-alkyl group reduce the
Recommended publications
  • Concomitant Drugs Associated with Increased Mortality for MDMA Users Reported in a Drug Safety Surveillance Database Isaac V
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Concomitant drugs associated with increased mortality for MDMA users reported in a drug safety surveillance database Isaac V. Cohen1, Tigran Makunts2,3, Ruben Abagyan2* & Kelan Thomas4 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is currently being evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). If MDMA is FDA-approved it will be important to understand what medications may pose a risk of drug– drug interactions. The goal of this study was to evaluate the risks due to MDMA ingestion alone or in combination with other common medications and drugs of abuse using the FDA drug safety surveillance data. To date, nearly one thousand reports of MDMA use have been reported to the FDA. The majority of these reports include covariates such as co-ingested substances and demographic parameters. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was employed to uncover the contributing factors to the reported risk of death among MDMA users. Several drug classes (MDMA metabolites or analogs, anesthetics, muscle relaxants, amphetamines and stimulants, benzodiazepines, ethanol, opioids), four antidepressants (bupropion, sertraline, venlafaxine and citalopram) and olanzapine demonstrated increased odds ratios for the reported risk of death. Future drug–drug interaction clinical trials should evaluate if any of the other drug–drug interactions described in our results actually pose a risk of morbidity or mortality in controlled medical settings. 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is currently being evaluated by the Food and Drug Adminis- tration (FDA) for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). During the past two decades, “ecstasy” was illegally distributed and is purported to contain MDMA, but because the market is unregulated this “ecstasy” may actually contain adulterants or no MDMA at all1.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations
    CANADIAN STROKE BEST PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS MOOD, COGNITION AND FATIGUE FOLLOWING STROKE Table 1C: Summary Table for Selected Pharmacotherapy for Post-Stroke Depression Update 2019 Lanctôt KL, Swartz RH (Writing Group Chairs) on Behalf of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations Mood, Cognition and Fatigue following Stroke Writing Group and the Canadian Stroke Best Practice and Quality Advisory Committee, in collaboration with the Canadian Stroke Consortium © 2019 Heart & Stroke Heart and Stroke Foundation Mood, Cognition and Fatigue following Stroke Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations Table 1C Table 1C: Summary Table for Selected Pharmacotherapy for Post-Stroke Depression This table provides a summary of the pharmacotherapeutic properties, side effects, drug interactions and other important information on selected classes of medications available for use in Canada and more commonly recommended for post-stroke depression. This table should be used as a reference guide by health care professionals when selecting an appropriate agent for individual patients. Patient compliance, patient preference and/or past experience, side effects, and drug interactions should all be taken into consideration during decision-making, in addition to other information provided in this table and available elsewhere regarding these medications. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) Serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake Other inhibitors (SNRI) Medication *citalopram – Celexa *duloxetine – Cymbalta methylphenidate – Ritalin (amphetamine)
    [Show full text]
  • Methylphenidate Hydrochloride
    Application for Inclusion to the 22nd Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines: METHYLPHENIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE December 7, 2018 Submitted by: Patricia Moscibrodzki, M.P.H., and Craig L. Katz, M.D. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Graduate Program in Public Health New York NY, United States Contact: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3 Summary Statement Page 4 Focal Point Person in WHO Page 5 Name of Organizations Consulted Page 6 International Nonproprietary Name Page 7 Formulations Proposed for Inclusion Page 8 International Availability Page 10 Listing Requested Page 11 Public Health Relevance Page 13 Treatment Details Page 19 Comparative Effectiveness Page 29 Comparative Safety Page 41 Comparative Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Page 45 Regulatory Status Page 48 Pharmacoepial Standards Page 49 Text for the WHO Model Formulary Page 52 References Page 61 Appendix – Letters of Support 2 1. Summary Statement of the Proposal for Inclusion of Methylphenidate Methylphenidate (MPH), a central nervous system (CNS) stimulant, of the phenethylamine class, is proposed for inclusion in the WHO Model List of Essential Medications (EML) & the Model List of Essential Medications for Children (EMLc) for treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) under ICD-11, 6C9Z mental, behavioral or neurodevelopmental disorder, disruptive behavior or dissocial disorders. To date, the list of essential medications does not include stimulants, which play a critical role in the treatment of psychotic disorders. Methylphenidate is proposed for inclusion on the complimentary list for both children and adults. This application provides a systematic review of the use, efficacy, safety, availability, and cost-effectiveness of methylphenidate compared with other stimulant (first-line) and non-stimulant (second-line) medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Preferred Drug List Illinois Medicaid 10/1/2019: Revised 11/06/2019 for Drugs Not Found on This List, Go to the Drug Search Engine At
    Preferred Drug List Illinois Medicaid 10/1/2019: Revised 11/06/2019 For drugs not found on this list, go to the drug search engine at: www.ilpriorauth.com *Exceptions as noted above* ▪ADHD Agents: Prior authorization required for participants under 6 years of age and participants 19 years of age and older ▪Spiriva AER 1.25mcg: Prior authorization NOT required for participants ages 6-17 years ▪Budesonide: Prior authorization NOT required for participants age 7 years and under ▪Anticonvulsants: Prior authorization NOT required for non-preferred epilepsy agents for those participants with a diagnosis of epilepsy or seizure disorder in Department records ▪Antipsychotics: Prior authorization required for participants under 8 years of age and long- term care residents 1 of 27 Preferred Drug List Illinois Medicaid 10/1/2019: Revised 11/06/2019 For drugs not found on this list, go to the drug search engine at: www.ilpriorauth.com Category Preferred Preferred, Requires PA Non-Preferred ADHD Agent - Amphetamine Mixtures* AMPHETAMINE/DEXTROAMPHETAMINE ADDERALL ADDERALL XR MYDAYIS ADHD Agent - Amphetamines* VYVANSE ADZENYS ER ADZENYS XR-ODT AMPHETAMINE SULFATE DESOXYN DEXEDRINE DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SULFATE DEXTROAMPHETAMINE SULFATE ER DYANAVEL XR EVEKEO EVEKEO ODT METHAMPHETAMINE HCL PROCENTRA ZENZEDI ADHD Agent - Selective Alpha Adrenergic Agonists CLONIDINE HCL ER INTUNIV CLONIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE ER GUANFACINE ER ADHD Agent - Selective Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor* ATOMOXETINE ATOMOXETINE HYDROCHLORIDE STRATTERA 2 of 27 Preferred Drug List Illinois
    [Show full text]
  • 624.Full.Pdf
    1521-009X/44/5/624–633$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/dmd.115.068932 DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION Drug Metab Dispos 44:624–633, May 2016 Copyright ª 2016 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics Development of a Rat Plasma and Brain Extracellular Fluid Pharmacokinetic Model for Bupropion and Hydroxybupropion Based on Microdialysis Sampling, and Application to Predict Human Brain Concentrations Thomas I.F.H. Cremers, Gunnar Flik, Joost H.A. Folgering, Hans Rollema, and Robert E. Stratford, Jr. Brains On-Line BV, Groningen, The Netherlands (T.I.F.H.C., G.F. J.H.A.F.); Rollema Biomedical Consulting, Mystic, Connecticut (H.R.); and Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mylan School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (R.E.S.) Received December 11, 2015; accepted February 24, 2016 Downloaded from ABSTRACT Administration of bupropion [(6)-2-(tert-butylamino)-1-(3-chlorophenyl) concentration ratio at early time points was observed with propan-1-one] and its preformed active metabolite, hydroxybupropion bupropion; this was modeled as a time-dependent uptake clear- [(6)-1-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-[(1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-propanyl)amino]- ance of the drug across the blood–brain barrier. Translation of the 1-propanone], to rats with measurement of unbound concentrations model was used to predict bupropion and hydroxybupropion dmd.aspetjournals.org by quantitative microdialysis sampling of plasma and brain extra- exposure in human brain extracellular fluid after twice-daily cellular fluid was used to develop a compartmental pharmacoki- administration of 150 mg bupropion. Predicted concentrations netics model to describe the blood–brain barrier transport of both indicate that preferential inhibition of the dopamine and norepi- substances.
    [Show full text]
  • Levomilnacipran (Fetzima®) Indication
    Levomilnacipran (Fetzima®) Indication: Indicated for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), FDA approved July 2013. Mechanism of action Levomilnacipran, the more active enantiomer of racemic milnacipran, is a selective SNRI with greater potency for inhibition of norepinephrine relative to serotonin reuptake Compared with duloxetine or venlafaxine, levomilnacipran has over 10-fold higher selectivity for norepinephrine relative to serotonin reuptake inhibition The exact mechanism of the antidepressant action of levomilnacipran is unknown Dosage and administration Initial: 20 mg once daily for 2 days and then increased to 40 mg once daily. The dosage can be increased by increments of 40 mg at intervals of two or more days Maintenance: 40-120 mg once daily with or without food. Fetzima should be swallowed whole (capsule should not be opened or crushed) Levomilnacipran and its metabolites are eliminated primarily by renal excretion o Renal impairment Dosing: Clcr 30-59 mL/minute: 80 mg once daily Clcr 15-29 mL/minute: 40 mg once daily End-stage renal disease (ESRD): Not recommended Discontinuing treatment: Gradually taper dose, if intolerable withdrawal symptoms occur, consider resuming the previous dose and/or decrease dose at a more gradual rate How supplied: Capsule ER 24 Hour Fetzima Titration: 20 & 40 mg (28 ea) Fetzima: 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 120 mg Warnings and Precautions Elevated Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: measure heart rate and blood pressure prior to initiating treatment and periodically throughout treatment Narrow-angle glaucoma: may cause mydriasis. Use caution in patients with controlled narrow- angle glaucoma Urinary hesitancy or retention: advise patient to report symptoms of urinary difficulty Discontinuation Syndrome Seizure disorders: Use caution with a previous seizure disorder (not systematically evaluated) Risk of Serotonin syndrome when taken alone or co-administered with other serotonergic agents (including triptans, tricyclics, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone, and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Levomilnacipran for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
    Out of the Pipeline Levomilnacipran for the treatment of major depressive disorder Matthew Macaluso, DO, Hala Kazanchi, MD, and Vikram Malhotra, MD An SNRI with n July 2013, the FDA approved levomil- Table 1 once-daily dosing, nacipran for the treatment of major de- Levomilnacipran: Fast facts levomilnacipran pressive disorder (MDD) in adults.1 It is I Brand name: Fetzima decreased core available in a once-daily, extended-release formulation (Table 1).1 The drug is the fifth Class: Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake symptoms of inhibitor serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibi- MDD and was well Indication: Treatment of major depressive tor (SNRI) to be sold in the United States disorder in adults tolerated in clinical and the fourth to receive FDA approval for FDA approval date: July 26, 2013 trials treating MDD. Availability date: Fourth quarter of 2013 Levomilnacipran is believed to be the Manufacturer: Forest Pharmaceuticals more active enantiomer of milnacipran, Dosage forms: Extended–release capsules in which has been available in Europe for 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, and 120 mg strengths years and was approved by the FDA in Recommended dosage: 40 mg to 120 mg 2009 for treating fibromyalgia. Efficacy of capsule once daily with or without food levomilnacipran for treating patients with Source: Reference 1 MDD was established in three 8-week ran- domized controlled trials (RCTs).1 cial and occupational functioning in addi- Clinical implications tion to improvement in the core symptoms Levomilnacipran is indicated for treating of depression.5
    [Show full text]
  • Sibutramine Hydrochloride Monohydrate) Capsule CS-IV
    MERIDIA - sibutramine hydrochloride capsule ---------- MERIDIA® (sibutramine hydrochloride monohydrate) Capsule CS-IV DESCRIPTION MERIDIA® (sibutramine hydrochloride monohydrate) is an orally administered agent for the treatment of obesity. Chemically, the active ingredient is a racemic mixture of the (+) and (-) enantiomers of cyclobutanemethanamine, 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethyl-α-(2-methylpropyl)-, hydrochloride, monohydrate, and has an empirical formula of C17H29Cl2NO. Its molecular weight is 334.33. The structural formula is shown below: Sibutramine hydrochloride monohydrate is a white to cream crystalline powder with a solubility of 2.9 mg/mL in pH 5.2 water. Its octanol: water partition coefficient is 30.9 at pH 5.0. Each MERIDIA capsule contains 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg of sibutramine hydrochloride monohydrate. It also contains as inactive ingredients: lactose monohydrate, NF; microcrystalline cellulose, NF; colloidal silicon dioxide, NF; and magnesium stearate, NF in a hard-gelatin capsule [which contains titanium dioxide, USP; gelatin; FD&C Blue No. 2 (5- and 10-mg capsules only); D&C Yellow No. 10 (5- and 15-mg capsules only), and other inactive ingredients]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Mode of Action Sibutramine produces its therapeutic effects by norepinephrine, serotonin and dopamine reuptake inhibition. Sibutramine and its major pharmacologically active metabolites (M1 and M2) do not act via release of monoamines. Pharmacodynamics Sibutramine exerts its pharmacological actions predominantly via its secondary (M1) and primary (M2) amine metabolites. The parent compound, sibutramine, is a potent inhibitor of serotonin (5- hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and norepinephrine reuptake in vivo, but not in vitro. However, metabolites M1 and M2 inhibit the reuptake of these neurotransmitters both in vitro and in vivo.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Parkinson’s Disease Volume 2015, Article ID 609428, 71 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/609428 Review Article Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease Philippe Huot,1,2,3 Susan H. Fox,1,2 and Jonathan M. Brotchie1 1 Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8 2Division of Neurology, Movement Disorder Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399BathurstStreet,Toronto,ON,CanadaM5T2S8 3Department of Pharmacology and Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, UniversitedeMontr´ eal´ and Centre Hospitalier de l’UniversitedeMontr´ eal,´ Montreal,´ QC, Canada Correspondence should be addressed to Jonathan M. Brotchie; [email protected] Received 19 September 2014; Accepted 26 December 2014 Academic Editor: Maral M. Mouradian Copyright © 2015 Philippe Huot et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The motor manifestations of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are secondary to a dopamine deficiency in the striatum. However, the degenerative process in PD is not limited to the dopaminergic system and also affects serotonergic and noradrenergic neurons. Because they can increase monoamine levels throughout the brain, monoamine reuptake inhibitors (MAUIs) represent potential therapeutic agents in PD. However, they are seldom used in clinical practice other than as antidepressants and wake-promoting agents. This review article summarises all of the available literature on use of 50 MAUIs in PD. The compounds are divided according to their relative potency for each of the monoamine transporters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Altering Brain CYP2B Activity on Nicotine Self-Administration Behaviour and Nicotine Levels in the Brain
    The Effect of Altering Brain CYP2B Activity on Nicotine Self-Administration Behaviour and Nicotine Levels in the Brain by Kristine Garcia A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Toronto © Copyright by Kristine Garcia 2016 The Effect of Altering Brain CYP2B Activity on Nicotine Self- Administration and Nicotine Levels in the Brain Kristine Garcia Doctor of Philosophy Pharmacology and Toxicology University of Toronto 2016 Abstract Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes play an important role in drug metabolism. While CYPs are abundantly expressed in the liver, where CYP-mediated drug metabolism typically occurs, these enzymes are also expressed in other tissues such as the brain. Local brain drug metabolism can influence the response to drugs that act within the brain. The CYP subfamily 2B (CYP2B) is expressed in the brain and is responsible for metabolizing many central nervous system (CNS)- acting drugs including nicotine, the main psychoactive ingredient in cigarettes. Genetic variation in human CYP2B6 is associated with greater conversion to nicotine dependence and risk of relapse in smokers without influencing peripheral nicotine metabolism. This suggests that local brain nicotine metabolism could influence nicotine levels that in turn mediate nicotine reinforcement and resulting behaviours. The role of brain CYP2B activity in nicotine reinforcement was investigated by injecting a pharmacological CYP2B inhibitor into the brain of rats that then underwent nicotine self-administration (NSA), which models smoking behaviour. Inhibitor-treatment increased NSA acquisition, motivation to obtain nicotine and the number of sessions required to extinguish behaviour, suggesting that inhibiting brain CYP2B activity can augment nicotine-reinforced behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Antidepressants, Other Review 04/14/2009
    Antidepressants, Other Review 04/14/2009 Copyright © 2004 - 2009 by Provider Synergies, L.L.C. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, digital scanning, or via any information storage and retrieval system without the express written consent of Provider Synergies, L.L.C. All requests for permission should be mailed to: Attention: Copyright Administrator Intellectual Property Department Provider Synergies, L.L.C. 5181 Natorp Blvd., Suite 205 Mason, Ohio 45040 The materials contained herein represent the opinions of the collective authors and editors and should not be construed to be the official representation of any professional organization or group, any state Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee, any state Medicaid Agency, or any other clinical committee. This material is not intended to be relied upon as medical advice for specific medical cases and nothing contained herein should be relied upon by any patient, medical professional or layperson seeking information about a specific course of treatment for a specific medical condition. All readers of this material are responsible for independently obtaining medical advice and guidance from their own physician and/or other medical professional in regard to the best course of treatment for their specific medical condition. This publication, inclusive of all forms contained herein, is intended to be
    [Show full text]
  • Adverse Effects of First-Line Pharmacologic Treatments of Major Depression in Older Adults
    Draft Comparative Effectiveness Review Number xx Adverse Effects of First-line Pharmacologic Treatments of Major Depression in Older Adults Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 www.ahrq.gov This information is distributed solely for the purposes of predissemination peer review. It has not been formally disseminated by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The findings are subject to change based on the literature identified in the interim and peer-review/public comments and should not be referenced as definitive. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or Department of Health and Human Services (AHRQ) determination or policy. Contract No. 290-2015-00012I Prepared by: Will be included in the final report Investigators: Will be included in the final report AHRQ Publication No. xx-EHCxxx <Month, Year> ii Purpose of the Review To assess adverse events of first-line antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults 65 years or older. Key Messages • Acute treatment (<12 weeks) with o Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (duloxetine, venlafaxine), but not selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (escitalopram, fluoxetine) led to a greater number of adverse events compared with placebo. o SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram and fluoxetine) and SNRIs (duloxetine and venlafaxine) led to a greater number of patients withdrawing from studies due to adverse events compared with placebo o Details of the contributing adverse events in RCTs were rarely reported to more clearly characterize what adverse events to expect.
    [Show full text]