DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case Against Climate Geoengineering Acknowledgements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Case Against Climate Geoengineering Acknowledgements The Case Against Climate Geoengineering Acknowledgements Biofuelwatch, Heinrich Böll Foundation and ETC Group are grateful to all that collaborated in writing and reviewing this report. We would like to give special thanks to Lili Fuhr, Linda Schneider, Anja Chalmin, Holly Dressel, Joana Chelo, Oliver Munnion and Simon Fischer for research and writing support. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Heinrich Böll Foundation, the CS Fund and the Rockerfeller Brothers Fund to produce this report. Biofuelwatch, Heinrich Böll Foundation and ETC Group are solely responsible for the views expressed in this report. The original research for this report was done by the ETC Group and Biofuelwatch, with the financial support and collaboration of the Heinrich Böll Foundation. Editing by Kathy Jo Wetter and Trudi Zundel Design by Stig First published November 2017 All our publications are downloadable free of charge at: www.biofuelwatch.org.uk www.boell.de www.etcgroup.org Published under the Creative Commons licence: Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives 3.0 BIGTHE BAD FIX The Case Against Climate Geoengineering www.etcgroup.org www.biofuelwatch.org www.boell.de/en Contents 5 Chapter 1 – Geoengineering: The Emperors’ New Climate A New, Environmental Empire; Empire’s Techno-fixes 6 Does the Emperor have Clothes? Empirical Hubris in History 7 A “Climate of the Willing”? 8 The Emperor’s new hose? 10 Safe, fair and ecologically sustainable solutions to the climate crisis 11 Chapter 2 – Geoengineering: The Technologies 12 Box: Three categories of Geoengineering as proposed by geoengineers 14 Land: Geoengineering technologies that target terrestrial ecosystems 15 Oceans: Geoengineering technologies that target marine ecosystems 16 Air: Geoengineering technologies that target the atmosphere 20 Chapter 3 – Case Studies 20 Case Study I: Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage 21 Case Study II: Fixing the climate with algae? 24 Case Study III: Ocean fertilization: LOHAFEX, Planktos-Haida-Oceaneos 25 Case Study IV: Ocean fertilization: Korea Polar Research Institute 26 Case Study V: Artificial (Ocean) Upwelling in China 27 Case Study VI: The SPICE experiment 28 Case Study VII: SCoPEx: Stratospheric aerosol injection experiment 29 Case Study VIII: Marine Cloud Brightening in Monterey Bay, California 30 Chapter 4 – The Case Against Geoengineering 30 Mega Scale; Unreliable and high-risk; Environmental hazards; Irreversibility; 31 Exacerbate global power imbalances and inequity; Intergenerational injustice; Justification for climate inaction; Carbon profiteering; Convergence of large-scale emerging technologies; Global control 32 Weaponization; Treaty violation; Diversion of resources, funding and research efforts from real solutions 2 The Big Bad Fix: The Case Against Climate Geoengineering 33 Chapter 5 – Who Is Behind Geoengineering? 33 Old fossils, new frames; The Geoclique 34 Cliques are not good for democracy or science 35 Literature and patents – who owns geoengineering? 36 Research on geoengineering; Multinational research projects 38 National programs 39 The IPCC: normalizing geoengineering? 40 The Climate Merchants 42 War climate: military & geoengineering 43 Conservationist for the Earth... Manipulation 44 Defending Mother Earth: geoengineering and indigenous resistance 46 Chapter 6 – Geoengineering Governance 46 Is it possible to govern geoengineering? The Holy Grail of “negative emissions” 47 A starting point; Geoengineering discussions at the UN 48 Transboundary nature; Research and governance – the chicken and the egg? 49 Is a global consensus possible? Broad societal deliberations must come first 50 Box: A legitimate discussion on geoengineering governance must be: 51 Chapter 7 – The Way Forward 51 A radical realism; The norm is a rejection of geoengineering 52 Maintain and reinforce the moratoria; Stop open-air experiments 53 Work for a ban; Broad societal debates, broad frameworks ; Hands Off Mother Earth! 55 Annex 1 – Geoengineering at the United Nations 60 Annex 2 – Non-governmental initiatives on geoengineering governance 62 Endnotes 77 Glossary of Geoengineering Technology Acronyms 77 About the authors - ETC group, Biofuelwatch and Heinrich Böll Foundation ETC Group Biofuelwatch Heinrich Böll Foundation 3 Preface As a rapidly warming world manifests heat waves, We also need sound, socially-just and culturally-appropriate floods, droughts and hurricanes, geoengineering – strategies to repay our land-carbon debt by vastly, yet carefully, large-scale manipulation of the Earth’s natural restoring natural ecosystems. Avoiding efforts to address the root causes of climate change, and focusing on end-of pipe systems – is being presented as a strategy to geoengineering technologies, is a political choice, not a counteract, dilute or delay climate change without destiny. It says that it is more acceptable to risk irreparable disrupting energy- and resource-intensive economies. harm to our planet than alter the dominant economic system. Alarmingly, current debates about this big techno-fix It is not a technical or scientific necessity – it is a defence of a are limited to a small group of self-proclaimed experts failed status quo that continues to protect the riches of the reproducing undemocratic worldviews and few. technocratic, reductionist perspectives. Developing ‘The Big Bad Fix’ expands and updates the 2010 report, countries, indigenous peoples, and local Geopiracy. Jointly authored by the ETC Group, communities are excluded and left Biofuelwatch and the Heinrich Böll voiceless. Avoiding Foundation, it offers NGO activists, social movements, policy makers, journalists and As this report details, each of the efforts to address other change agents a comprehensive proposed geoengineering technologies the root causes of climate overview of the key actors, technologies threatens people and ecosystems. change, and focusing on and negotiating fora of geoengineering. Holistic assessments of the technologies It also provides an analysis and history of also show that if deployed they are end-of pipe geoengineering the debate, the various interests shaping highly likely to worsen rather than technologies, is a political it, and case studies on the most important mitigate the impacts of global warming. choice, not a technologies and experiments. It argues for The irreversibility, risk of weaponization, destiny. an urgent and immediate ban on the and implications for global power dynamics deployment and outdoor testing of climate inherent in large-scale climate geoengineering also geoengineering, overseen by a robust and accountable make it an unacceptable option. In 2010, governments in the multilateral global governance mechanism. Global South took the issue to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and achieved a de facto A debate about geoengineering and its governance is moratorium on geoengineering deployment and outdoor needed, but it must be a broad, participatory and transparent experimentation. debate from the grassroots, grounded in international law, built on the precautionary principle and informed by a So why are we now seeing an escalating discourse around rigorous understanding of real, existing, transformative and geoengineering? In short, the “tyranny of urgency” of climate just climate policies and practices. We need a movement of change is being harnessed to push the debate on movements coming together to oppose geoengineering as a geoengineering from academic papers and computer models technofix and false solution to the climate crisis and refocus to climate policy arenas and – even more importantly – to on real changes. A movement that starts with communities outdoor experiments. and civil society organizations. A movement of movements There is an urgency, of course. Post-Paris Agreement, that demands Hands Off Mother Earth! governments must acknowledge that traditional, light-touch 1 December 2017 emission reduction strategies are not enough. We need an honest conversation about radical emission reduction Barbara Unmüßig, President, Heinrich Böll Foundation pathways that transcend mainstream economic thinking. Pat Mooney, Co-founder, ETC Group Rachel Smolker, Co-Director, Biofuelwatch 4 The Big Bad Fix: The Case Against Climate Geoengineering Chapter 1 Geoengineering: The Emperors’ New Climate A New, Environmental Empire Empire’s Techno-fixes Geoengineering has come to mean large-scale, intentional Miracles once conjured by storytellers and conveyed by the human manipulation of climate or Earth systems. Despite a writers of scripture are now the purview of technologists. We long history of discussion within military contexts, today have, in fact, become routinely successful at local level geoengineering is less often discussed as a technology of war ‘miracles’: we can ask a box on our coffee table how to dress a and more often presented as a risky but potentially necessary wound and to order bandages to our door. Sometimes, we can techno-fix for climate change, a prudent insurance even help the blind see, the disabled walk and bring policy in the event of an imminent climate crisis. the seemingly dead back to life. And we have This report details the geoengineering expanded our miraculous capabilities beyond technologies under consideration and The reasons the local to the global: we have learned to describes the actors and the fora planet Earth is on fly across oceans and into the cosmos. contemplating and/or addressing trajectory for climate chaos, We are now expanding our
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Natural Resources
    U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation Increasing Carbon Soil Sequestration on Public Lands Expert Testimony by Dr. W. Richard Teague Texas A&M AgriLife Research Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Good afternoon. Thank you Chairman Bishop, Ranking Member Grijalva, and all of the members of this subcommittee for the chance to speak with you today. I am Richard Teague, Associate Resident Director of Texas A&M AgriLife Research in Vernon, Texas. I am also a Professor in the Department of Ecosystem Science and Management at Texas A&M University and Senior Scientist of the Texas A&M Norman Borlaug Institute for International Agriculture. I am honored to speak with you today about the important issue of increasing carbon sequestration on public lands. Background and experience I was raised in a farm community and schooled in Zimbabwe before obtaining a BSc (Agriculture) in grassland science (1972) at Natal University in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, and a PhD in botany and microbiology (1987) at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. As a research scientist working on the management of rangelands since 1972, I have visited most grazing areas of the world, attending conferences and presenting the results of my research. I actively seek out leading conservation ranchers in the ecoregions I visit, including Zimbabwe, South Africa, Namibia, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, Chile, Canada and most of the western rangeland states in USA. I am intimately aware of the research that has been done on grazing management in most parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Reports 2014
    INDEX Message from the Director-General 1 Research Activities 3 Full Research 5 Incubation Studies 80 Completed Research (CR) Follow-up Grants 81 Centers for Research Development (CRD) and Promotion (CRP) 83 Outreach Program and Events RIHN International Symposium 84 RIHN Forum 85 RIHN Public Seminars 86 RIHN Kids Seminar 86 RIHN Open House 86 RIHN Area Seminars 86 RIHN Tokyo Seminar 87 The Earth Forum Kyoto and International Symposium 87 The Earth Hall of Fame KYOTO 87 RIHN Seminars 87 Lunch Seminars (Danwakai) 88 RIHN Annual Open Meeting 90 Press Conferences 90 Publications 91 Individual Achievements 92 Appendices 1. Number and Affiliation of Project Members 2. Research Fields of Project Members 3. Research Project Sites 1 Message from the Director-General The Research Institute for Humanity and Nature was established in April 2001 by the Government of Japan to promote integrated research in the field of global environmental studies. As a national institute, RIHN solicits, develops, hosts, and funds fixed-term research projects on pressing areas of interaction between humanity and nature. RIHN thus promotes coordinated, problem-centered, context-specific, and multi-dimensional science. RIHN projects can last from three to five years; they are always multidisciplinary and employ multiple methodologies, and they are supposed to offer solutions to the problems under through trans-disciplinary approach with various stakeholders of the society. As of the end of FY2014 RIHN has completed twenty-six research projects, each of which has established extensive research networks in order to make important contributions in its area of specialization. FY2014 is the final year of the phase II of the interim plan of RIHN, and we overviewed the overall activities of the institute and published the report of the external review.
    [Show full text]
  • Jianwu (Jim) Tang Associate Scientist The
    Tang, J. Curriculum Vitae 1/27 Jianwu (Jim) Tang Associate Scientist The Ecosystems Center Phone: 508-289-7162 Marine Biological Laboratory E-mail: [email protected] Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 Web: http://www.mbl.edu/ecosystems/staff/tang/ Education B.S. 1988-1992 Peking University, China Geology M.S. 1992-1995 Peking University, China Environmental Sciences Ph.D.1999-2003 University of California, Berkeley Ecosystem Sciences Postdoc 2003-2004 University of California, Berkeley: Soil respiration Res. Associate 2004-2006 University of Minnesota: Forest carbon cycles Professional Positions 7/1995-6/1999 Assistant Professor and Lecturer, Center for Environmental Sciences, Peking University, China 10/2006-12/2007 Research Scientist, Chicago Botanic Garden 10/2006-12/2007 Adjunct Assistant Professor, Northwestern University 1/2008-9/2014 Assistant Scientist, The Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory 7/2009-10/2014 Assistant Professor, Brown University-MBL joint graduate program (the joint program ended in 2014) 10/2014-present Associate Scientist, The Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory Teaching 2008-present Teaching for the “Semester in Environmental Sciences” at MBL in each fall on the topic of soil respiration and soil-plant interactions. 1/2014-5/2014 Terrestrial Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling (GEO 2920), Brown University. 1/2011-5/2011 Terrestrial Nitrogen and Carbon Cycling (GEO 2920), Brown University. 9/2007-12/2007 Ecosystem Ecology (PBC 405), Northwestern University. 3/2007-5/2007 Soil Ecology (PBC 440), Northwestern University (co- instructor). 1/2006-5/2006 Biosphere-Atmosphere Interactions (FR 5480), University of Minnesota. 1/2002-5/2002 Ecological Modeling (ESPM 254), University of California at Berkeley (co-instructor).
    [Show full text]
  • Ll~~D G-~,T,'T~ M Lb Oao~ SR
    ~ \Ll~~D G-~,t,'t~ M lb Oao~ SR.. \ C\ Cf \ ACTIVATING GEOTHERAPY AND GLOBAL BIOETHICS 1. Creating a global bioethics. Transforming the Earth into a stable and unpolluted ecosystem will depend on the will of its peoples. The will must be nurtured by accurate information about the state of the planet and possibilities for the betterment and survival of the Biosphere, which is presently disturbed by human numbers and lifestyles. Possibilities of improving the biosphere correspond to "geotherapy", care of the Earth. Improving the health of the biosphere (including humanity) requires a conscious programme of geotherapy. Like medical therapy, geotherapy should use the latest scientific information, experience and common sense to diagnose patient Earth's ills, prescribe a corrective regime and apply it in a disciplined manner, without exaggeration, to establish vigorous health. Geotherapeutic measures must be motivated, that is they must be acceptable to and desired by all peoples. The principles of global bioethics should serve as a guide for geotherapy, our future cultural evolution and the biological evolution of other species, which we ineluctably control. Global bioethics is not an existing system for export from industrialized countries; it should be a common synthesis of all countries. It includes accepting responsibility for delivering an improved world to our descendants. Its immediate task is to identify a human consensus on desires and will for the future. The rational base for global bioethics should come from a scientific understanding of the Earth, its history, processes and inhabitants. To go with this understanding a global philosophy for bettering life is essential to the well-being and survival of our species and others.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Strategy
    The United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Strategy Table of Contents 1. Introduction a) Restoration, conservation and sustainable use of natural resources b) Role of the UN Member States 2. Vision and theory of change a) Barriers b) Pathways 3. Implementation a) Pathway I: building a global movement · Facilitating collaboration · Developing a values-based restoration imperative · Engaging individuals · Partnering with youth · Working with educators · Showcasing flagships and champions · Laying post-2030 foundations b) Pathway II: generating political support · Engaging heads of state and other decision-makers · Convening cross-sectoral dialogues · Unlocking and reorienting finance c) Pathway III: building technical capacity · Deploying science and technology in ecosystem restoration · Catalysing and accelerating action on the ground d) Management arrangements · Governance structures · Funding · Monitoring progress i Executive Summary: The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration This strategy is the result of a global, open and inclusive consultation process in 2019 and 2020. It will be adapted periodically and will guide the implementation of the UN Decade by all stakeholders in a spirit of partnership, inclusiveness and joint coordinated action. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development seeks to end poverty, conserve biodiversity, combat climate change and improve livelihoods for everyone, everywhere. These objectives, encapsulated in 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are unlikely to be met unless ecosystem degradation is stopped and ecosystem restoration is undertaken at the immense scale of hundreds of millions of hectares globally. Currently, there is insufficient political support and technical capacity in both the public and private sectors to invest in the many hundreds of thousands of ecosystem restoration initiatives worldwide that are needed to achieve restoration at such a scale.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilization of Soils Hallmarks of the Unintended & Intended Anthropocene
    The Civilization of Soils Hallmarks of the Unintended & Intended Anthropocene Erich J. Knight Shenandoah Gardens [email protected] Thanks to Bob Wells; "These are Turnips On Biochar....................Any Questions??" Craig Sam's Char-colate Cacao Trees Bearing fruit in Three years versus Five Iwamoto Biochar for Aquaculture and Poultry Iwamoto Biochar for Aquaculture and Poultry Gasification – Energy-Based Environmental Solutions Benefits of Gasification Gasification Produces Heat, Steam, and/or Electricity Meets regulatory requirements from a Variety of Biomass and Other Fuels with an alternative solution Coaltec Energy USA, Inc. addresses waste disposal and facility energy Converts waste material into a revenue stream needs, allowing business owners to concentrate on their core business Select best use(s) for energy – expertise. Coaltec’s gasification systems can produce heat, steam heat, chilling, steam, or electricity, with the option of and/or electricity as desired, as well as EcoChar (Coaltec’s varying the use depending on demand trademarked biochar product), and are designed to fit the host site’s Eliminates or reduces costs needs. Depending on the application, a portion of the thermal energy now associated with waste disposal may also be used to dry moisture-laden products (waste grain, Halts the release of non- vegetable residue, high-moisture manures, etc.), making them easier beneficial nutrients to waterways as a result of runoff and less costly to transport or use for fuel. Our gasifiers are extremely from farm fields and storage piles versatile, able to operate using a variety of different fuels, while Odors are destroyed in the remaining a carbon negative solution for your business.
    [Show full text]
  • September Gsat 03
    GSA 2005 Annual Meeting Technical Program Issue Inside: Call for GSA Committee Service, p. 52 Call for GSA Officer and Councilor Nominations, p. 54 Limnogeology Division Award, p. 57 Road grip. The most basic law of nature. The rugged Subaru Outback® XT. Lower center of gravity. 250 horsepower. Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive standard. Just put it where you want it. ™ subaru.com ® VOLUME 15, NUMBER 6 JUNE 2005 Cover: The GSA Annual Meeting returns to colorful Utah, bringing thousands of geoscientists together in Salt Lake City this October. Featured on both the GSA TODAY publishes news and information for more than 18,000 GSA members and subscribing libraries. GSA Today meeting Program cover and the Abstracts lead science articles should present the results of exciting new with Programs volume is Bryce Canyon research or summarize and synthesize important problems National Park, one of the many natural or issues, and they must be understandable to all in the earth wonders of the area. science community. Submit manuscripts to science editors Keith A. Howard, [email protected], or Gerald M. Ross, [email protected]. GSA TODAY (ISSN 1052-5173 USPS 0456-530) is published 11 times per year, monthly, with a combined April/May issue, by The Geological Society of America, Inc., with offices at 3300 Penrose Place, Boulder, Colorado. Mailing address: P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140, USA. Periodicals postage paid at Boulder, Colorado, and at additional mailing offices. Postmaster: SLC 2005 Science • Learning • Colleagues Send address changes to GSA Today, GSA Sales and Service, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract the Quantity of Carbon Contained in Soils Is Directly Related to the Diversity and Health of Soil Biota
    Restoring Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide to Pre-Industrial Levels: Re-Establishing the Evolutionary Grassland-Grazer Relationship Adam D. Sacks 1, Richard Teague 2, Fred Provenza 3, Seth Itzkan 4, Jim Laurie 1 1Biodiversity for a Livable Climate, Lexington, Massachusetts 2Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Texas A&M University System, Vernon, Texas 3Dept. Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 4Planet-TECH Associates, Somerville, Massachusetts [Final Draft. To be published by CRC Press in 2014 in a book by Thomas Goreau entitled Geotherapy . For inquiries, please contact lead author at [email protected].] Abstract The quantity of carbon contained in soils is directly related to the diversity and health of soil biota. Since virtually all organic carbon sequestered in soils is extracted from the atmosphere by photosynthetic organisms, and converted to complex molecules by bacteria and fungi in synergy with insects and animals, we propose an effective and sustainable method for increasing soil organic carbon by restoring degraded and desertified grasslands worldwide. This approach to grassland management uses livestock according to the principles of Holistic Planned Grazing, the effectiveness of which has been demonstrated on over millions of hectares on four continents, primarily in semi-arid and arid areas, since the 1970s. We maintain that it has the potential to remove excess atmospheric carbon resulting from anthropogenic soil loss over the past 10,000 years and as well as all industrial-era greenhouse gas emissions. This sequestration potential, when applied to up to 5 billion hectares of degraded range and agricultural soils (former wild grasslands), could, in theory, return 10 or more gigatons of excess atmospheric carbon to the terrestrial sink annually and lower greenhouse gas concentrations to pre-industrial levels in a matter of decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Biorock Electric Reefs Grow Back Severely Eroded Beaches in Months
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Biorock Electric Reefs Grow Back Severely Eroded Beaches in Months Thomas J. F. Goreau 1,2,* and Paulus Prong 2,3 1 Global Coral Reef Alliance, 37 Pleasant Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2 Biorock Indonesia, Bali 80361, Indonesia; [email protected] 3 Pulau Gangga Dive Resort, Sulawesi 95253, Indonesia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-617-864-4226 Received: 18 June 2017; Accepted: 27 September 2017; Published: 11 October 2017 Abstract: Severely eroded beaches on low lying islands in Indonesia were grown back in a few months—believed to be a record—using an innovative method of shore protection, Biorock electric reef technology. Biorock shore protection reefs are growing limestone structures that get stronger with age and repair themselves, are cheaper than concrete or rock sea walls and breakwaters, and are much more effective at shore protection and beach growth. Biorock reefs are permeable, porous, growing, self-repairing structures of any size or shape, which dissipate wave energy by internal refraction, diffraction, and frictional dissipation. They do not cause reflection of waves like hard sea walls and breakwaters, which erodes the sand in front of, and then underneath, such structures, until they collapse. Biorock reefs stimulate settlement, growth, survival, and resistance to the environmental stress of all forms of marine life, restoring coral reefs, sea grasses, biological sand production, and fisheries habitat. Biorock reefs can grow back eroded beaches and islands faster than the rate of sea level rise, and are the most cost-effective method of shore protection and adaptation to global sea level rise for low lying islands and coasts.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBAL SYMPOSIUM on SOIL ORGANIC CARBON, Rome, Italy, 21-23 March 2017
    GLOBAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOIL ORGANIC CARBON, Rome, Italy, 21-23 March 2017 Regenerative development to reverse climate change: Quantity and quality of soil carbon sequestration control rates of CO2 and climate stabilization at safe levels Thomas J. Goreau1 1Soil Carbon Alliance, [email protected], 37 Pleasant Street, Cambridge, MA, USA Abstract Today’s CO2 atmosphere concentrations will lead to devastating increases in global temperatures and sea level over the thousands of years that cold deep ocean waters warm up, even if no more fossil fuel CO2 is added. Long-term impacts shown by climate records are much greater than IPCC projections, which are politically mandated to only include short-term initial responses. They ignore 90% or more of the long-term climate impacts that will affect future generations for millions of years unless CO2 is rapidly reduced to pre-industrial levels, giving policy makers a false sense of security. Even complete emissions reductions cannot remove the existing CO2 excess already in the atmosphere, only increased carbon sinks can do so, and only soil has the capacity to store it in time to avert runaway climate change. CO2 can be reduced to safe levels in decades if 1) current carbon farming sequestration practices are applied on a large scale, 2) lifetime of soil carbon storage is increased with biochar, and 3) with large scale restoration of coastal marine wetland peat soils, especially using new electrical stimulation methods. Regenerative Development strategies to reverse climate change by increasing soil and biomass carbon need to be implemented by UNFCCC. Keywords: CO2 sequestration, soil carbon, lifetime, burial rates, stabilization time, reversing climate change, regenerative development Introduction, scope and main objectives Climate change strategies claiming that 2 degrees C warming or 350 ppm are “acceptable” sentence coral reefs and low lying countries to death.
    [Show full text]
  • Report We Consider Only Agricultural Uses for Biochar, Though Biochar Also Has Applications in Filtration, Environmental Remediation, Etc
    The Economics of Biochar Carbon Sequestration in Massachusetts David Timmons, Ph.D.*; Ariana Lema-Driscoll, and Gazi Uddin, MA University of Massachusetts Boston Funding for this study was provided by the UMass Clean Energy Extension under the Seed Grant program for UMass faculty. University of Massachusetts Boston UMass Clean Energy Extension Department of Economics Agricultural Engineering 209 100 Morrissey Blvd. 50 Natural Resources Way Boston MA 02125-3393 Amherst MA 01003-9295 USA USA October 16, 2017 *corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Executive Summary Biochar is the charcoal residue produced by biomass pyrolysis, or heating of biomass (e.g. wood) with insufficient oxygen for complete combustion. Biochar has long been used to improve productivity of agricultural soils, especially in the humid tropics. Because biochar persists in soil for centuries to millennia, its production represents a way to sequester carbon drawn from the atmosphere by some form of biomass (e.g. trees). We estimate the cost in Massachusetts of using biochar from forest biomass to sequester carbon. This cost represents a possible indicator of the social cost of carbon, i.e. the cost of reversing current carbon emissions. To estimate net carbon sequestration cost, we first review the agricultural benefits of biochar and estimate their value. While there is much anecdotal evidence that biochar increases crop yields, and some experimental evidence of this from other places, we find few published studies of biochar yield effects in Massachusetts, indicating one research need. For agricultural value estimates, we assume that biochar could increase Massachusetts crop yields by 10%, a figure consistent with other studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Climate Change Solution Right Under Our Feet Gone Tomorrow: Fertile Soils, Nutritional Value Disappearing
    The climate change solution right under our feet Gone Tomorrow: Fertile Soils, Nutritional Value Disappearing Loss of soil fertility is a global crisis. Since the adoption of chemical fertilizers, topsoil has lost significant organic matter. Soil erodes faster than it’s replenished, and nature takes 1,000 years to create a mere 3 centimeters. Thus, 30% of arable land is now barren. We only have 60-100 harvests left. Water contamination threatens the health of all life. Roughly 60% of soil ends up in rivers, streams and lakes, intensifying contamination from runoff fertilizers and pesticides. Deforestation decimates wildlife populations. Mass tree loss destroys our soils, rangelands and freshwater. Entire ecosystems suffer. Nutritionally-depleted food is the price we pay for the current industrial agriculture paradigm. Nutrient levels of calcium, iron, and vitamins A and C have been dropping drastically, causing a dramatic loss in the nutritional level of almost all minerals and nutrients. Climate Change Matters: Earth, Oceans in Peril Global warming has dramatically decreased snow and glacial coverage worldwide. In the last decade, Antarctica’s rate of ice mass loss has tripled. Sea levels rose about eight inches in the previous century. This rate has nearly doubled in the last two decades and is accelerating every year. Oceans are warmer and more acidic due to increased carbon dioxide absorption. This kills off coral reefs, further endangers aquatic life and adds to extreme weather events. Widespread fires have magnified concerns that we are locked in a worldwide pattern of conflagration that is both persistent and catastrophic. Restore the Earth, Stabilize the Climate Remineralization, widely regarded by a growing movement as a blueprint for restoring ecological balance, is crucial to roll back the effects of climate change.
    [Show full text]