The Chalgrove Meteors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Chalgrove Meteors THE CHALGROVE METEORS An in flight ejection seat test from WL419 credited with over 200 ejection seat tests to date. th Since the Gloster Whittle F./40 prototype made its first flight on 24 July 1943 at Barford St. John, this aircraft and its following variants has proved one of the most versatile ever to have entered squadron service. More popularly recognised as the Meteor, it first saw action in the hands of N0 616 Squadron, RAF, in July 1944 against the V.1 flying bombs and since that date has been used for countless duties as well as being exported in its hundreds to many other countries. The Meteor has played an important part in the development of the Martin-Baker ejection seat. After early flight trials had been completed with the ejection seat mounted in the turret position of a Boulton-Paul Defiant, it became necessary to conduct tests at speeds higher than the 300 mph the Defiant was capable of reaching. The Ministry of Aircraft Production then allocated a Meteor F.Mk.3 to the Company as the most suitable aircraft then available. th Delivered to Oakley Airfield near Thame, then being used by Martin-Baker, on the 6 November 1945, EE416 was one of a production batch of 180 aircraft given the Gloster type number G.41D and fitted with Rolls Royce Derwent Series 1 engines. Considerable modifications were made to the forward fuselage structure to enable the ejection seat to be fitted in the ammunition bay behind the existing cockpit. The original seat bulkhead was removed and replaced by a new sloping bulkhead further aft; the rear decking at longeron level at the front spar bulkhead was replaced by an arched member and the floor beams were specially strengthened to withstand the loads imposed by the ejection gun. On completion of this work (all done with the blessing of the stress department at Glosters), EE416 began its new life at th Chalgrove on 8 June 1946 with a static ejection test being carried out with the aid of a catch net. Martin-Baker commenced ejection seat testing using a Boulton Paul Defiant in May 1945. th EE416 – began ejection seat testing at Chalgrove on 8 june 1946. th On 24 June 1946 the first dummy ejection was made from the Meteor in flight at an indicated airspeed of 415 mph and at an altitude of 2000 feet. Eleven more airborne th tests were carried out with EE416 before 24 July 1946. On this day two dummy shots took place, both at 350 mph at 4500 feet before the first live ejection test in this country. Undertaken by Bernard (Benny) Lynch, then one of Martin-Baker’s experimental fitters, at a speed of 320 mph, this ejection was perfect and was undoubtedly a landmark in the development of aircrew escape equipment and a highlight in the history of the Martin-Baker Aircraft Company. Since July 1946 Benny Lynch went on to make a further sixteen live ejection tests from the Meteors, both at home and overseas, and was awarded the British Empire Medal for his work. Subsequently EE416 was used in over 400 airborne tests in the development of the Martin-Baker seat. The aircraft is now pensioned off and the nose section previously on display as part of an exhibit in the Science Museum in London, together with the seat which was used in the first live ejection and the seat used in the first emergency th ejection on 30 May 1949. It has now been removed from the Science Museum and donated to the Imperial War Museum Duxford. Four other Meteors were, at this period, associated with Martin-Baker. Delivered at the same time as EE416 was its immediate forerunner EE415 . This was used in an attempt at aerial photography of the ejection sequence, the ammunition tanks behind the cockpit being removed and replaced with an angled camera to enable EE415 to fly slightly astern of EE416. Unfortunately aerial photography was never much of a success as the rapid deceleration of the seat on ejection allowed only a very small part of the sequence to be filmed before disappearing out of the camera’s line of sight. th On 24 July 1946, Bernard (Benny) Lynch ejected himself from Meteor EE416 at 230 mph IAS at 8,000 feet recording the World’s first live ejection with a Martin-Baker seat. Bernard Lynch (left) and J.O. Lancaster (first live ejectee) with the cockpit section of EE416 presented to the Science Museum in London. After having being flown on several occasions by Squadron Leader Booth, EE415 th was returned to Glosters at Morton Valance on 19 October. A similar Meteor EE338, was allocated by the Royal Aircraft Establishment at Farnborough as a photographic aircraft but was not used to any great extent. Next on the list was yet another F.Mk.3, EE479. Received by Martin-Baker at Oakley th on 28 February 1946, it was intended as a cockpit installation example for the ejection seats but work on this aircraft was never completed. Early in June 1946 Martin-Baker moved to Chalgrove, an ex-wartime airfield near Oxford operated by the US Army Air Force. It was at Chalgrove that the last aircraft of this period one of the first batch of Meteor F.Mk.4’s, EE519 flown in to Chalgrove th on 4 October 1950 to operate alongside EE416. However, some seven months later it was flown back to Glosters by Peter Twiss, not having been used for anything significant. Approaching the end of its usefulness EE416 was joined by a Meteor T. Mk 7 two seat trainer, WA634, again obtained through the Ministry of Supply. Originally allocated to Gloster Aircraft Co., it was built in November 1949 and, having a maximum level speed at sea level of 585 mph, it was soon to prove its value in the further development of the seat in the higher speed ranges. th Received by Martin-Baker on 30 January 1952 as a Meteor T.Mk.7, it was modified in the same manner as EE416 but this time having the added advantage of already being a two seater. Modifications included changing the bulkhead between the tandem cockpits, strengthening of the flooring and removal of the controls from the th rear cockpit. It was then returned to Gloster on 18 June 1952 for the fitting of the E.1/44 “high speed” rear fuselage and tail unit, later to be fitted to the Meteor F.Mk 8’s. This modification also improves the directional stability of the aircraft and gives more directional control under asymmetric power in the case of engine failure. th Returning to Martin-Baker for further modifications on 24 July it began the first of st its many ejection tests on 31 August 1953. The original canopy changes required on WA634 for ejection seat testing. WA634 with a newly improved canopy. Many notable ejections in the history of Martin-Baker have been recorded including the first live runway ejection by Squadron Leader J.S.Fifield at Chalgrove Airfield on rd 3 September 1955. The ejection took place as the Meteor was travelling along the runway and some six seconds later Squadron Leader Fifield was safely on the ground having accomplished an ejection which, up to then, many people had thought impossible. The following month he again ejected from WA634, this time at the other end of the scale, from a height of 40,000 feet. Three years later the aircraft flew over to the Hanover Air Show in Germany to demonstrate the low level capabilities of the seat, this time with Rolf Bullwinkel as the subject. With the trials starting on the Martin-Baker rocket assisted ejection seat it was necessary to determine beforehand what effect the rocket blast would have in a confined cockpit space. For this purpose the Company obtained the shell of Meteor WA686. This aircraft was a combination of a T.Mk.7 rear fuselage and cockpit but minus wings, engines and tail assembly. After a number of static shots with the rocket seat these effects were determined and work started again on modifying WA634. The World’s first live ejection test from runway level by Squadron leader J.S. (Fifi) rd Fifield – 3 September 1955. WA634 currently resides at the RAF Museum Cosford fitted with its original modified canopy. Completion of this work was accomplished by September 1961 and consisted of the reinforcement of the outside and inside of the rear fuel tank cover, reinforcing the inside of the front tank cover with fibreglass and stiffeners; rear cockpit strengthened with a box structure and stiffeners and the longerons and false longerons tied by triangular structures and carried down to the skin. Front longeron joints to centre section joints were reinforced on the outside with stainless steel strips to carry the ejection loads and the cockpit floors strengthened. After these modifications were finished WA634 embarked on the rocket seat test series and was the aircraft used in the first live airborne test of the new rocket seat th on 13 March 1962. Squadron Leader Peter Howard of the Institute of Aviation Medicine ejected at a height of 250 feet at a speed of 250 knots and described the ride as “very smooth”. WA634 reached the end of its useful life during 1962 having participated in some seven hundred ejection seat tests, including over 50 with the rocket assisted seat. The aircraft now resides as part of the Martin-Baker ejection seat development display at the RAF Museum Cosford near Wolverhampton.
Recommended publications
  • Home at Airbus
    Journal of Aircraft and Spacecraft Technology Original Research Paper Home at Airbus 1Relly Victoria Virgil Petrescu, 2Raffaella Aversa, 3Bilal Akash, 4Juan M. Corchado, 2Antonio Apicella and 1Florian Ion Tiberiu Petrescu 1ARoTMM-IFToMM, Bucharest Polytechnic University, Bucharest, (CE), Romania 2Advanced Material Lab, Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, Second University of Naples, 81031 Aversa (CE), Italy 3Dean of School of Graduate Studies and Research, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, UAE 4University of Salamanca, Spain Article history Abstract: Airbus Commerci al aircraft, known as Airbus, is a European Received: 16-04-2017 aeronautics manufacturer with headquarters in Blagnac, in the suburbs of Revised: 18-04-2017 Toulouse, France. The company, which is 100% -owned by the industrial Accepted: 04-07-2017 group of the same name, manufactures more than half of the airliners produced in the world and is Boeing's main competitor. Airbus was Corresponding Author: founded as a consortium by European manufacturers in the late 1960s. Florian Ion Tiberiu Petrescu Airbus Industry became a SAS (simplified joint-stock company) in 2001, a ARoTMM-IFToMM, Bucharest subsidiary of EADS renamed Airbus Group in 2014 and Airbus in 2017. Polytechnic University, Bucharest, (CE) Romania BAE Systems 20% of Airbus between 2001 and 2006. In 2010, 62,751 Email: [email protected] people are employed at 18 Airbus sites in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium (SABCA) and Spain. Even if parts of Airbus aircraft are essentially made in Europe some come from all over the world. But the final assembly lines are in Toulouse (France), Hamburg (Germany), Seville (Spain), Tianjin (China) and Mobile (United States).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Exhibits at IWM Duxford
    List of exhibits at IWM Duxford Aircraft Airco/de Havilland DH9 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (Ex; Spectrum Leisure Airspeed Ambassador 2 (EX; DAS) Ltd/Classic Wings) Airspeed AS40 Oxford Mk 1 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (AS; IWM) Avro 683 Lancaster Mk X (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 100 Vampire TII (BoB; IWM) Avro 698 Vulcan B2 (AS; IWM) Douglas Dakota C-47A (AAM; IWM) Avro Anson Mk 1 (AS; IWM) English Electric Canberra B2 (AS; IWM) Avro Canada CF-100 Mk 4B (AS; IWM) English Electric Lightning Mk I (AS; IWM) Avro Shackleton Mk 3 (EX; IWM) Fairchild A-10A Thunderbolt II ‘Warthog’ (AAM; USAF) Avro York C1 (AS; DAS) Fairchild Bolingbroke IVT (Bristol Blenheim) (A&S; Propshop BAC 167 Strikemaster Mk 80A (CiA; IWM) Ltd/ARC) BAC TSR-2 (AS; IWM) Fairey Firefly Mk I (FA; ARC) BAe Harrier GR3 (AS; IWM) Fairey Gannet ECM6 (AS4) (A&S; IWM) Beech D17S Staggerwing (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Fairey Swordfish Mk III (AS; IWM) Bell UH-1H (AAM; IWM) FMA IA-58A Pucará (Pucara) (CiA; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress (CiA; IWM) Focke Achgelis Fa-330 (A&S; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress Sally B (FA) (Ex; B-17 Preservation General Dynamics F-111E (AAM; USAF Museum) Ltd)* General Dynamics F-111F (cockpit capsule) (AAM; IWM) Boeing B-29A Superfortress (AAM; United States Navy) Gloster Javelin FAW9 (BoB; IWM) Boeing B-52D Stratofortress (AAM; IWM) Gloster Meteor F8 (BoB; IWM) BoeingStearman PT-17 Kaydet (AAM; IWM) Grumman F6F-5 Hellcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Branson/Lindstrand Balloon Capsule (Virgin Atlantic Flyer Grumman F8F-2P Bearcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC)
    [Show full text]
  • RAF Centenary 100 Famous Aircraft Vol 3: Fighters and Bombers of the Cold War
    RAF Centenary 100 Famous Aircraft Vol 3: Fighters and Bombers of the Cold War INCLUDING Lightning Canberra Harrier Vulcan www.keypublishing.com RARE IMAGES AND PERIOD CUTAWAYS ISSUE 38 £7.95 AA38_p1.indd 1 29/05/2018 18:15 Your favourite magazine is also available digitally. DOWNLOAD THE APP NOW FOR FREE. FREE APP In app issue £6.99 2 Months £5.99 Annual £29.99 SEARCH: Aviation Archive Read on your iPhone & iPad Android PC & Mac Blackberry kindle fi re Windows 10 SEARCH SEARCH ALSO FLYPAST AEROPLANE FREE APP AVAILABLE FOR FREE APP IN APP ISSUES £3.99 IN APP ISSUES £3.99 DOWNLOAD How it Works. Simply download the Aviation Archive app. Once you have the app, you will be able to download new or back issues for less than newsstand price! Don’t forget to register for your Pocketmags account. This will protect your purchase in the event of a damaged or lost device. It will also allow you to view your purchases on multiple platforms. PC, Mac & iTunes Windows 10 Available on PC, Mac, Blackberry, Windows 10 and kindle fire from Requirements for app: registered iTunes account on Apple iPhone,iPad or iPod Touch. Internet connection required for initial download. Published by Key Publishing Ltd. The entire contents of these titles are © copyright 2018. All rights reserved. App prices subject to change. 321/18 INTRODUCTION 3 RAF Centenary 100 Famous Aircraft Vol 3: Fighters and Bombers of the Cold War cramble! Scramble! The aircraft may change, but the ethos keeping world peace. The threat from the East never entirely dissipated remains the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Workshop
    BIOGRAPHIES Douglas Andrew Lead Infrastructure Specialist The World Bank ______________________________________________________________________ Doug Andrew is a Lead Infrastructure Specialist at the World Bank. .He recently retired as Group Director Economic Regulation and member of the UK Civil Aviation Authority Board. He is an Associate Fellow at Warwick University Business School. Previously he was Deputy Secretary, Tax and Regulation, in the New Zealand Treasury. He led the CAA in its economic regulation of and application of competition policy to privately and state-owned UK airports, airlines together with the air traffic control. He was a founding member of EUROCONTROL’s Performance Review Commission. He has Masters degrees in economics and public policy from Princeton and Auckland Universities. Adam R Brown Vice President – Customer Affairs Directorate Airbus SAS ______________________________________________________________________ Adam Brown was born in Kirdford, England in 1940 and educated at Rugby School and Peterhouse, Cambridge, from which he received a Master's degree in Mechanical Sciences. He joined the de Havilland Aircraft Co., then part of Hawker Siddeley Aviation, in 1962, working first in sales engineering and subsequently in sales. In 1973 he came to Airbus as General Sales Manager. After a variety of senior assignments in sales, marketing, strategy and forecasting, Adam Brown assumed his present function in April 2004. In this position, his task is to increase Airbus’s formal presence at external events and to ensure that Airbus’s position is well represented throughout the industry. In recognition of his contribution to Anglo-French aeronautical collaboration, Adam Brown has been appointed a Chevalier in the French national Order of Merit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Air Force BAE Systems Hawk
    The Finnish Air Force t Hawk 66 Hawk 51 BAE Systems Hawk The BAE Systems Hawk is a British single-engined two-seat advanced jet trainer. The Finnish Air Force's Hawks bear the military designation HW and are operated by Fighter Squadron 41 of the the Air Force Academy, primarily in advanced and tactical training roles. In the Hawk, a cadet pursuing a fighter pilot's career gets his or her first taste of jet flying after having learnt basic flying skills at the controls of a piston-engined aircraft. The first (advanced) Hawk training phase, designated HW 1, starts during the second year of cadets' studies in the National Defence University and consists of Hawk type rating, navigation, instrument flying, aerobatics, formation flying, and night flying. The next (lead-in) phase, known as HW 2, focuses on tactical training and consists of basic air-to-air and air-to-ground work before students progress to the more demanding Hornet multi-role fighter. The Hawk can also carry air sampling pods that were used extensively during the volcanic ash crisis in the spring of 2010. The Hawk has has limited engagement capability against attack aircraft, helicopters and other equivalent targets under favorable conditions. The Hawk is also flown by the Air Force's official display team the Midnight Hawks, in which case the team's four aircraft are fitted with smoke generators for enhanced visual effect. Team pilots are flight instructors. During the 2017 display season six aircraft used by the team received a special blue-and-white livery in celebration of the 100th anniversary of Finland’s independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawker Siddeley HS 748 Series 2 Aircraft G-ATEK and G-ATEH of Channel Airways Report on the Accidents at Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth~ Hampshire on 15 August 1967
    CIVIL AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT 1/71 ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATION BRANCH Department of Trade and Industry Hawker Siddeley HS 748 Series 2 aircraft G-ATEK and G-ATEH of Channel Airways Report on the accidents at Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth~ Hampshire on 15 August 1967 LONDON: HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1971 List of Civil Aircraft Accident Reports issued by AIB in 1971 No. Short title Date of publication 1nl Hawker Siddeley HS 748's G-ATEK and March 1971 G-ATEH at Portsmouth, August 1967 SBN 11 5106308 Department of Trade and Industry Accidents Investigation Branch Shell Mex House Strand London WC2 November 1970 The Rt Hon John Davies MP Secretary of State for Trade and Industry Sir , I have the honour to submit the report of Mr RC Warren, an Inspector of Accidents, on the circumstances of the accidents to Hawker Siddeley HS 748 Series 2 aircraft G-ATEK and G-ATEH which occurred at Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth, Hampshire on 15 August 1967. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient Servant, V AM HUNT Chief Inspector of Accidents Accidents Investigation Branch Civil Accident Combined Report Nos EW/C/0179 and EW/C/0180 Aircraft: Hawker Siddeley HS 748, .Series , 2, G-ATEK and G-ATEH Engines: Each aircraft was fitted with two Rolls Royce Dart Type 531 engines. Owner and Channel Airways Limited, Southend Airport, Essex Operator: Crews: G-ATEK Commander Captain D P Dogherty Uninjured Co-pilot First Officer K F Fenton Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss J W Goody Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss J Hoare Uninjured G-ATEH Commander Captain F P Mannl Uninjured Co-pilot First Officer C Petrides Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss G M Smith Uninjured Air Stewardess Miss P Crane Uninjured Passengers: G-ATEK 19 Uninjured G-ATEH 62 Uninjured Other Persons: Nil Place of Accident: Portsmouth Airport, Portsmouth, Hampshire Date and Times: 15 August 1967 at 1148 hrs (G-ATEK) and 1334 hrs (G-ATEH) All times in this report are GMT The abbreviation MOA/DTI is used in this report to refer to the authority previously exercised by the Ministry of Aviation.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawker Siddeley and British Aerospace in Kingston
    HAWKER SIDDELEY AND BRITISH AEROSPACE IN KINGSTON Export Hawk variants have been continuously developed to deliver the pilot training needed for the latest combat aircraft The initial 50 series export Hawks were similar to the RAF TMk1 but with external fuel tanks. The 60 series were more powerful and the 100 series had avionics and cockpit systems representative of 21st century fighters. The versatility of the Hawk added greatly to its value, most export Hawks fulfilled the dual role of advanced trainer and ground attack fighter. The biggest overseas customer for Hawks was the United States Navy with their standard advanced trainer, the T-45 Goshawk To satisfy the requirement for carrier operations the airframe and undercarriage were strengthened and a tail hook and catapult facility were added. Design and manufacture was shared with McDonnell-Douglas in the USA. The single seat 200 series Hawk offered customers a high performance air combat and ground attack fighter at a bargain price Hawk variants remained in production at BAe and BAE Systems for over 35 years with almost 1,000 sold to 18 countries The 1978 Hawker Siddeley/BAe Sea Harrier FRSMk1 with its nose mounted radar, raised cockpit and Sidewinder missiles was a potent fleet defence fighter retaining the Harrier’s full ground attack capability Sea Harrier returned air power to the Royal Navy who for several years had only operated helicopters. It was ideally suited to the small (15000 ton) Invincible class through-deck cruisers and came into its own during the 1982 Falkland Islands war with Argentina. Without the Harriers and their carriers it would not have been possible to defeat the invaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Jammed Elevator Prompts Twin-Turboprop Rejected Takeoff, Runway Over-Run
    FLIGHT SAFETY FOUNDATION Accident Prevention Vol. 56 No. 4 For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight April 1999 Jammed Elevator Prompts Twin-turboprop Rejected Takeoff, Runway Over-run The investigating authority said that deficiencies in the Hawker Siddeley 748 flight control gust-lock system might have caused the elevator gust lock to re-engage when the flight crew checked the flight controls at the beginning of the takeoff. FSF Editorial Staff On Aug. 16, 1996, the flight crew of an Emerald • “Inadequacies in maintenance information and Airways Hawker Siddeley (HS) 748 Series 2A implementation that led to failure to correctly rejected a takeoff at Liverpool (England) Airport maintain a gust-lock system, the design of which when takeoff rotation was prevented by a jammed is inherently sensitive to deficiencies; [and,] elevator. The airplane was substantially damaged when it struck an instrument landing system (ILS) • “Lack of fully effective modification action, power-supply building off the end of the runway. The following the fatal over-run accident to HS 748, flight crew, alone aboard the airplane, was not G-BEKF, at Sumburgh [Shetland Islands, injured. Scotland] Airport on 31 July 1979 (AIB [U.K. Accidents Investigation Branch1] Report 1/81), The U.K. Air Accidents Investigation Branch to address the inherent design sensitivity of the (AAIB) said, in its final report, that the causes of the flight controls gust-lock system.” accident were: The Sumburgh accident occurred when the airplane, operated • “Flight control gust-lock system deficiencies, which by Dan-Air Services, exited the end of the runway and entered probably caused the elevator lock to re-engage on the North Sea while taking off for a charter flight to Aberdeen, completion of the crew’s full-and-free check of the flight Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Picking Winners: How UK Industrial Policy Ensured the Success of the Aerospace and Automobile Industries
    Picking Winners: How UK industrial policy ensured the success of the aerospace and automobile industries Kaveh Pourvand October 2013 1 Online Report: October 2013 © Civitas 2013 55 Tufton Street London SW1P 3QL Civitas is a registered charity (no. 1085494) and a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales (no. 04023541) email: [email protected] Independence: Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society is a registered educational charity (No.1085494) and a company limited by guarantee (No. 04023541). Civitas is financed from a variety of private sources to avoid over-reliance on any single or small group of donors. All the Institute’s publications seek to further its objective of promoting the advancement of learning. 2 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Section One: Why Industrial Policy? ....................................................................................................... 7 The inevitability of industrial policy: why Governments have to ‘pick winners’ ................................ 7 Active interventionism in the United States ....................................................................................... 8 The industrial policy tools available to government ........................................................................... 9 Section Two: The Aerospace Industry..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Hawker Aircraft Satellite Factory at Langley
    THE HAWKER AIRCRAFT SATELLITE FACTORY AT LANGLEY Hawker’s satellite factory and grass airfield at Langley By 1936 Hawker Aircraft Ltd again needed greater production capacity, in spite of the new erection shops built at Brooklands the previous year. Using a £30,000 loan from the Hawker Siddeley Aircraft Co, Parlaunt Farm, near Langley Buckinghamshire, was purchased and a factory and aerodrome were built. From 1938 large numbers of aircraft were built at Langley and flight development of all Hawker aircraft was conducted there. Hawker Hurricane production line at Langley during World War II Langley took over Hurricane production completely from Brooklands in 1941. Over 14,000 of the type were built: 9920 at Brooklands, Langley and Kingston with another 2750 by the Gloster Aircraft at Hucclecote and 300 by the Austin Motor Company at Longbridge. Overseas the Canadian Car & Foundry Company built 1451 in Montreal. The Hawker Tempest followed the Hurricane at Langley Flight development of the Hawker Tornado, Typhoon and Tempest was carried out at Langley. These next generation Hawker fighters had semi–monocoque fuselages replacing steel tube. Typhoon production was contracted to Gloster Aircraft. Almost 1400 of the faster Tempest were built at Langley. Hawker’s last piston engined fighter, the Sea Fury, was produced and flown at Langley The Sea Fury lightweight development of the Tempest for the Royal Navy, was the last type delivered from Langley, including many for export customers. Manufacturing work for aircraft up to the Hawker Hunter continued to 1958. Hawker’s first jet, the P.1040 was ground tested at Langley in 1947 Langley’s grass runway was unsuitable for jet aircraft and the closeness to the rapidly expanding Heathrow Airport ruled out building a hard runway.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawker Aircraft, Hawker Siddeley & British Aerospace in Kingston
    HAWKER AIRCRAFT, HAWKER SIDDELEY & BRITISH AEROSPACE IN KINGSTON H.G.Hawker Engineering 1920 - 1935 Hawker Aircraft 1935 - 1963 Hawker Siddeley Aviation 1963 - 1977 British Aerospace 1977 - 1992 Brief History In 1920 the Sopwith Aviation team re-started as H. G. Hawker Engineering Co., named after their pilot Harry Hawker. New aircraft were sold in small numbers until Sydney Camm became Chief Designer in 1925. 3,000 of Sydney Camm’s Hart and Fury biplanes were built through the 1930s, making Hawker very profitable. Hawker’s success allowed Tommy Sopwith to buy other British aircraft companies and form Hawker Siddeley Aircraft Hundreds of Sydney Camm’s Hurricane monoplane fighters were in service from the start of the war. 14,000 were built and it became the most successful allied fighter. Camm’s Typhoon and Tempest fighters were also invaluable in ground attack and intercepting V1 flying bombs. From 1948 the company, always based in Kingston, moved to the Richmond Road factory, with Dunsfold Aerodrome for final assembly and flight testing. Sir Sydney Camm’s jet aircraft were equally successful, 2,500 Sea Hawks and Hunters were built. Ralph Hooper secured Hawker’s future when he devised the vertical take-off P.1127 and its Harrier development. Under Chief Designer John Fozard the Harrier became the only successful vertical take-off combat aircraft. Over 800 were sold. As Chief Engineer Ralph Hooper directed the design of the Hawk advanced trainer and light fighter. Nearly 1000 had been sold by 2012. By 1977, when it was nationalised into British Aerospace, Sir Thomas Sopwith’s Hawker Siddeley Aviation owned half of Britain’s aircraft industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the British Aviation Industry in the Raf Museum: a Brief Guide
    RECORDS OF THE BRITISH AVIATION INDUSTRY IN THE RAF MUSEUM: A BRIEF GUIDE Contents Introduction 2 Section 1: Background to the collection 2 Arrangement of this Guide 3 Access to the records 3 Glossary of terms 4 The British aircraft industry: an overview 3 Section 2: Company histories and description of records 6 Appendix The British Aircraft Industry: a bibliography 42 1 Introduction The RAF Museum holds what is probably Britain's most comprehensive collection of records relating to companies involved in the manufacture of airframes (i.e. aircraft less their engines) aero-engines, components and associated equipment. The entries in this guide are arranged by company name and include a history of each company, particularly its formation and that of subsidiaries together with mergers and take-overs. Brief details of the records, the relevant accession numbers and any limitations on access are given. Where the records have been listed this is indicated. A glossary of terms specific to the subject area is also included, together with an index. Background to the Collection The Museum's archive department began collecting records in the late 1960s and targeted a number of firms. Although many of the deposits were arranged through formal approaches by the Museum to companies, a significant number were offered by company staff: a significant example is the Supermarine archive (AC 70/4) including some 50,000 drawings, which would have been burnt had an employee not contacted the Museum. The collections seem to offer a bias towards certain types of record, notably drawings and production records, rather than financial records and board minutes.
    [Show full text]