DOCSLIB.ORG

Modern Healthcare

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modern Healthcare http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160319/MAGAZINE/303199964?utm_source=modernhealthcare&utm_medium =email&utm_content=20160319-MAGAZINE-303199964&utm_campaign=financedaily Modern Healthcare Why venture capital firms are pouring money into health insurance By Bob Herman | March 19, 2016 Entrepreneur Vivek Garipalli has a dim view of the way health insurance companies treat providers and patients. Patients develop trust with doctors and hospitals, and he thought insurers should be the “glue” between them instead of creating friction. So Garipalli persuaded a couple of venture funds to pump $135 million into his own bid to build an insurer he describes as a technology-based clinical company, rather than “an actuarial engine” like the big legacy players. His company, Clover Health, sells only Medicare Advantage plans and has enrolled 16,000 members as of this month. It differs from UnitedHealth Group and other giants, Garipalli said, in the way it uses real-time patient data to connect seniors to the care they need. The plans also provide free primary-care visits, and notably, don't charge extra for seeing out-of-network providers. “The really large companies, like an Aetna or a United, they're really insurance companies at their core,” Garipalli said. “They spend a lot of money on technology, but we all know there's a big difference between spending a lot of money on technology and being a technology company.” Venture capitalists and entrepreneurs have been investing and building new health insurance and related companies at a torrid pace—which may seem odd, because the industry is highly regulated and has relatively low profit margins. But widespread consumer dissatisfaction with dominant carriers and the Affordable Care Act's new marketplaces for individual plans has created an opening for innovators to come up with alternative approaches and has primed investors to take a chance on what they're pitching. “There's a big difference between spending a lot of money on technology and being a technology company,” said Vivek Garipalli, CEO of Clover Health. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160319/MAGAZINE/303199964?utm_source=modernhealthcare&utm_medium =email&utm_content=20160319-MAGAZINE-303199964&utm_campaign=financedaily “It's abundantly clear that today's health insurance market is broken,” First Round Capital founder Josh Kopelman wrote this past September when his venture firm poured $4 million into Clover Health. “When it comes to technology, the giants shaping the industry are trailing 20 years behind. They have vast stores of data, but aren't leveraging them to improve the standard of service or care.” However, these alternative companies, many of which are in their infancy, have a lot to prove. The ACA's not-for-profit co-ops, which are essentially startups, have demonstrated how difficult it is to launch a new health plan. Twelve of the 23 co-op plans have failed, and others are in serious financial trouble. And some of the new for-profit darlings have already stumbled. New health insurance investments “are really quite speculative,” said Scott Harrington, a healthcare management professor at the University of Pennsylvania. “And in many instances, they are not likely to bear fruit.” Health-insurer and insurance-technology startups raised more than $1.2 billion in venture funding in 2015. That's more than double the $570 million raised in 2014, and 10 times the $123 million raised in 2013, according to CB Insights, a data company that tracks private startups and venture capital. With healthcare representing 17.5% of the U.S. economy, investors say they believe there's money to be made in controlling costs, and it will come from the pockets of legacy insurers, brokers and third-party administrators. “This is a market that's measured in trillions of dollars,” said Scott Raney, a partner at Redpoint Ventures, who led the firm's investment in Collective Health, a newcomer that helps employers self-insure. “That's appealing to us.” Today's health insurance startups generally fall along two branches. MH TAKEAWAYS Widespread consumer dissatisfaction with dominant insurance carriers and the ACA's marketplaces for individual plans has created an opening for innovators to create alternative approaches, and has primed investors to take a chance on them. One branch is composed of actual insurance companies that pay medical claims, contract with hospitals and doctors, and take on some kind of risk on behalf of their members—all with a bigger emphasis on consumer-friendly technology and data. Those include Oscar, Zoom+, Clover Health, Melody Health Insurance and Beam Dental. Oscar, which hired a Google veteran last week as its chief technology officer, recently completed a $400 million round with Fidelity Investments, giving the New York-based insurer a valuation of $2.7 billion. The second branch comprises purely tech-focused companies that are involved with buying, selling or managing health insurance. These include Zenefits, Collective Health, Stride Health, GetInsured, SimplyInsured, Gravie and Picwell. The founders of many of these startup companies have contagious exuberance for changing the healthcare system. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160319/MAGAZINE/303199964?utm_source=modernhealthcare&utm_medium =email&utm_content=20160319-MAGAZINE-303199964&utm_campaign=financedaily Garipalli at Clover Health is an evangelist for using technology to provide a seamless care experience at a lower cost to seniors. Garipalli has a background in investment banking, and he previously started CarePoint Health, a for-profit company formed to acquire three struggling New Jersey hospitals. Clover Health's other investors include Sequoia Capital, which was an early investor in Google and YouTube. Dr. Dave Sanders is CEO and co-founder of Zoom+, an insurer that owns neighborhood medical clinics and has raised millions from Endeavor Capital. Sanders, a physician by training, and founder of two other healthcare startups that were bought out, calls his Oregon-based company “Kaiser 4.0,” referring to the vertically integrated Kaiser Permanente system. Now, more than 250,000 mostly young people use Zoom+ regularly for all of their care. “We are a millennial health system insurer,” Sanders said. Health after noticing that many self-employed Americans struggled to obtain health insurance. Stride essentially works as a broker exclusively for those who work in the on-demand economy and their families. It has secured partnerships with car-sharing service Uber and crafts commerce site Etsy, and has enrolled thousands of people through the ACA's exchanges. “Everything's shifting, which is usually a good moment to jump in,” Lang said. “Yes, it's risky, but the incumbents have been shaken up as well.” But old rules apply even amid tectonic shifts in the industry. Zenefits, which offers employers a free platform to shop for employee health benefits, drew intense regulatory heat because it hired unlicensed brokers. The controversy was a reminder that healthcare can be a treacherous industry to disrupt. And earlier this month, Oscar disclosed it lost $105 million in 2015, largely because it booked higher-than-expected medical costs in its exchange plans, just like traditional players UnitedHealth and many Blue Cross and Blue Shield carriers. Venture capital firms have often avoided highly regulated industries. Dr. Bob Kocher, a partner at Venrock, has invested in insurance technology companies such as Stride and Zenefits. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160319/MAGAZINE/303199964?utm_source=modernhealthcare&utm_medium =email&utm_content=20160319-MAGAZINE-303199964&utm_campaign=financedaily The firm has not, however, put money into full-fledged health insurers because Kocher worries “about difficulty in achieving competitive provider contracts, high selling costs and low margins.” Medical-loss ratios also put a cap on how much insurers can make. Yet companies like Oscar and Clover Health are still receiving gobs of venture capital because they handle large volumes of premium dollars. “Margins are technically low but are off a really high revenue base,” Garipalli said. The onus now falls on both startup branches to show their value. Providers, employers and individuals will judge the companies' success by how much they grow and, more importantly, by how much they lower healthcare spending and improve patient outcomes. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20160319/MAGAZINE/303199964?utm_source=modernhealthcare&utm_medium =email&utm_content=20160319-MAGAZINE-303199964&utm_campaign=financedaily “Companies like Oscar and Zoom are going to have to show that their core model is effective at not only acquiring members, but also caring for members and managing the costs of members in ways that are as good or better than traditional models,” Sanders said. If so, they'll get more money from investors. But, Sanders said, if it turns out “their MLRs are way out of whack, I think maybe you'll see a freezing.” Emerging companies also have to prove they actually have something different to sell. Clever ads, video chats with doctors, data analytics and smartphone apps are appealing novelties in a conservative business. But there's some skepticism about whether technology alone can shake up and improve the conventional insurance model. “You're in a business where people pay premiums, and they want to go to the doctor and have the agreed-upon portion of their claims paid,” Penn's Harrington said. “It's still fundamentally a business of collecting money to pay claims.” Bob Herman Bob Herman covers the health insurance industry and other healthcare news. Before joining Modern Healthcare in 2014, he covered hospital finance as a reporter and editor at Becker’s Hospital Review. He has a bachelor's degree from Butler University in Indianapolis. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Handbook of Financing Growth
    ffirs.qxd 2/15/05 12:30 PM Page iii The Handbook of Financing Growth Strategies and Capital Structure KENNETH H. MARKS LARRY E. ROBBINS GONZALO FERNÁNDEZ JOHN P. FUNKHOUSER John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ffirs.qxd 2/15/05 12:30 PM Page b ffirs.qxd 2/15/05 12:30 PM Page a Additional Praise For The Handbook of Financing Growth “The authors have compiled a practical guide addressing capital formation of emerging growth and middle-market companies. This handbook is a valuable resource for bankers, accountants, lawyers, and other advisers serving entrepreneurs.” Alfred R. Berkeley Former President, Nasdaq Stock Market “Not sleeping nights worrying about where the capital needed to finance your ambitious growth opportunities is going to come from? Well, here is your answer. This is an outstanding guide to the essential planning, analy- sis, and execution to get the job done successfully. Marks et al. have cre- ated a valuable addition to the literature by laying out the process and providing practical real-world examples. This book is destined to find its way onto the shelves of many businesspeople and should be a valuable ad- dition for students and faculty within the curricula of MBA programs. Read it! It just might save your company’s life.” Dr. William K. Harper President, Arthur D. Little School of Management (Retired) Director, Harper Brush Works and TxF Products “Full of good, realistic, practical advice on the art of raising money and on the unusual people who inhabit the American financial landscape. It is also full of information, gives appropriate warnings, and arises from a strong ethical sense.
    [Show full text]
  • The View Beyond Venture Capital
    BUILDING A BUSINESS The view beyond venture capital Dennis Ford & Barbara Nelsen Fundraising is an integral part of almost every young biotech’s business strategy, yet many entrepreneurs do not have a systematic approach for identifying and prioritizing potential investors—many of whom work outside of traditional venture capital. re you a researcher looking to start a Why and how did the funding landscape During the downturns, it quickly became Anew venture around a discovery made change? apparent that entrusting capital to third-party in your laboratory? Perhaps you have already The big changes in the life science investor alternative fund managers was no longer an raised some seed money from your friends landscape start with the venture capitalist effective strategy, and investors began to with- and family and are now seeking funds to sus- (VC). In the past, venture capital funds were draw capital. The main reason for the with- tain and expand your startup. In the past, the typically capitalized by large institutional drawal (especially from VCs in the early-stage next step on your road to commercialization investors that consisted of pensions, endow- life science space) was generally meager returns would doubtless have been to seek funding ments, foundations and large family offices across the asset class; despite the high risk and from angels and venture capital funds; today, with $100 million to $1 billion in capital long lockup periods that investors accepted in however, the environment for financing an under management. Traditionally, the major- return for a promise of premium performance, early-stage life science venture looks strik- ity of these institutions maintained a low-risk, VCs were often not returning any more capital ingly different from that familiar landscape low-return portfolio of stocks and bonds that than investors would have earned by making of past decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release David Stepp FINAL
    Media Contact: Nicole Pack 650-475-3721 [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Venrock Promotes David Stepp to Partner Palo Alto, Calif., July 31, 2013 – Venrock, a pioneering venture capital firm established in 1969 by the Rockefeller family, today announced the promotion of David Stepp to partner. In addition to helping shape firm strategy, Stepp oversees the firm’s operations and administration, including structuring of fundraisings, investor relations, human resources, and the finance and legal functions. Stepp advises portfolio companies and actively participates in the structuring and implementation of portfolio investments, exits and significant transactions. Stepp is also responsible for the regulatory and compliance functions of the firm and serves as chief compliance officer. “David Stepp has been a key contributor across all dimensions of our business over the last six years,” said Bryan Roberts, partner at Venrock. “David’s promotion is a recognition of his commitment to our firm, its limited partners and our entrepreneurs. He is a terrific colleague and richly deserves this recognition.” Stepp joined Venrock as general counsel in 2007 from Cooley LLP. At Cooley, his practice focused on the formation and representation of venture capital partnerships and the representation of emerging growth and small-cap public technology companies. Stepp earned his B.S. in Molecular and Cellular Biology from the University of Arizona and his J.D. from Harvard Law School. About Venrock Originally established as the venture capital arm of the Rockefeller family in 1969, Venrock continues a tradition of partnering with entrepreneurs to establish successful, enduring companies. With a primary focus on technology and healthcare, portfolio companies have included Adify, Apple Computer, Athenahealth, Centocor, Check Point Software, DoubleClick, Endeca, Gilead Sciences, Idec Pharma, Imperva, Illumina, Intel, Millennium Pharma, SlideShare and Tudou.
    [Show full text]
  • Comment Letter on File No. S7-37-10
    enrock Building Companies that Shape the Future January 23,2011 Via Electronic Mail Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20549-1090 [email protected] Re: Release No. IA-3111; File No 87-37-10, Exemptions/or Advisers to Venture Capital Funds, Private Fund Advisers With Less Than $150 Million in Assets Under Management, and Foreign Private Advisers (the Proposed Rules) Dear Ms. Murphy: On July 21,2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) which, among other things, (i) amended the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act) to eliminate the current exemption from registration for investment advisers with fewer than 15 clients and (ii) provided for a new exemption from registration for investment advisers solely to venture capital funds (VCF Exemption). The Dodd-Frank Act further required or authorized the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) to adopt or revise certain rules applicable to investment advisers, including a rule defining a ''venture capital fund" (VCF). The Proposed Rules set forth this new definition. Venrock1 is pleased to have the opportunity to comment on the Proposed Rules, with a specific focus on the Commission's proposed definition ofa VCF for purposes ofthe new VCF Exemption. Once finalized, the Commission's definition ofa VCF will have a significant impact on the venture capital industry, not only defining which venture capital funds will continue to be exempted from the significant expense and time commitment required to comply with the reporting regime under the Advisers Act, but also for the first time setting forth a common definition ofa venture capital fund that is likely to be incorporated into future federal and state legislation entirely unrelated to the securities laws.
    [Show full text]
  • 281165000 Dormitory Authority of the State Of
    NEW ISSUE Moody’s: “Aa2” Standard & Poor’s: “AA” FitchRatings: “AA” (See “Ratings” herein) $281,165,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2008A2 Dated: Date of Delivery Due: July 1, as shown on inside cover Payment and Security: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A2 Bonds (the “Series 2008A2 Bonds”) are special obligations of the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (the “Authority”) payable from and secured by a pledge of (i) certain payments to be made under the Loan Agreement (the “2002 Loan Agreement”), dated as of December 5, 2001, as amended, between Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (the “Center”) and the Authority and Guaranties (the “Guaranties”), dated as of December 5, 2001, from the Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research and S.K.I. Realty, Inc. to the Authority (the “Revenues”) and (ii) all funds and accounts (excluding the Arbitrage Rebate Fund and any fund established for the payment of the Purchase Price of Option Bonds tendered for purchase) established under the Authority’s Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Revenue Bond Resolution adopted December 5, 2001 and the Series 2008A Resolution adopted March 26, 2008 (collectively, the “Resolution”). The 2002 Loan Agreement is a general, unsecured obligation of the Center and requires the Center to pay, in addition to the fees and expenses of the Authority and the Trustee, amounts sufficient to pay the principal and Redemption Price of and interest on all Bonds issued under the Resolution, including the Series 2008A2 Bonds, as such payments become due.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Options for Start-Up Small Businesses
    Small Business Administration Office of Investment and Innovation Funding Options for Start-up Small Businesses G. Nagesh Rao Office of Investment & Innovation NCET2 Webinar | JUNE 25, 2014 Science,Science, Technology,Technology, && InnovationInnovation PrioritiesPriorities forfor thethe 20152015 FederalFederal BudgetBudget • Manufacturing “We can win the future—by unleashing the talent and ingenuity of businesses and workers in every corner of • Energy this country…” • Climate • Health “…That's how America will win the future - by out- • Environment innovating, out-educating, and out-building our competitors.” – President Barack • National Security Obama Key Topical Areas of Interest $135.4 Billion Dollar Budget for Federal R&D = Renewed Commitment to STEM Enterprises in America - US Global Change Research Program - Networking & Information Technology R&D - National Nanotechnology Initiative Multi-agency Initiatives 2 Small Business Administration Science,Science, Technology,Technology, && InnovationInnovation PrioritiesPriorities forfor thethe 20152015 FederalFederal BudgetBudget These critical investments will not only spur technological innovation but will help develop a 21 st Century STEM workforce here in America that can maintain leadership and growth in critical areas of strategic economic and national security interest. 3 Small Business Administration What We Do @ 15,000 FT The $135 Billion R&D Budget of the United States – FY’15 Budget Breakdown by Spend Type “We know that the nation that goes all-in on innovation today will
    [Show full text]
  • Zettacom Raises $47.5 Million in Second Round -- Second Round Funding Led by Granite Global Ventures
    Contact: Amy Caplan ZettaCom, Inc, (408) 869-7000 [email protected] ZettaCom Raises $47.5 Million in Second Round -- Second Round Funding Led by Granite Global Ventures -- Santa Clara, Calif. – June 19, 2001 – ZettaCom, Inc., a leading supplier of high-performance and configurable optical silicon solutions, announced today that it has successfully completed the closing of its Series B equity round with a total amount of $47.5 million. This substantial round helps position ZettaCom as a significant force in the semiconductor components arena, and brings the total amount of equity financing issued, raised and committed to $58.5 million since the company’s inception in 1999. According to RHK, a leading telecommunications market research firm, the optical silicon market currently represents 15% of total service infrastructure spending. Optical silicon devices will result in a market that will grow to over $12 billion in 2005. ZettaCom’s unique background and product strategy will position it as a leader in this huge emerging market. Over twelve major design wins in the last seven months validate ZettaCom’s claim to leadership in this space. The company’s recent infusion of funds will accelerate the build-out of ZettaCom’s specialized communication ICs (integrated circuits), expansion of its national operations, further development initiatives, and continued growth of the company’s highly skilled, professional teams. The Series B investors include: Granite Global Ventures, Venrock Associates, Norwest Venture Partners, J. & W. Seligman & Co., Development Bank of Singapore, JPMorgan Partners (NYSE:JPM), k1 Ventures, Vertex Management, Crimson Ventures, Infineon Ventures, U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray (NYSE:USB), SG Cowen Ventures Fund, Banc of America Securities LLC (NYSE:BAC), and United Investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Nordan Nordan Boosts Venrock's Energy Efforts with Deep
    Venrock Adds Another Key Ingredient to Energy Team: Matthew Nordan Nordan Boosts Venrock’s Energy Efforts with Deep Emerging Technology Expertise Cambridge, Mass., August 24, 2009 – Venrock, a premier venture capital firm originally established as the venture arm of the Rockefeller family, announced today that Matthew Nordan, co-founder and former president of Lux Research, has joined the firm as a vice president to focus on energy, environmental and materials technologies from Venrock’s Cambridge office. “We’re looking for game-changing technology – companies that will have a substantial and meaningful impact on the biggest market in the world,” said Ray Rothrock, partner at Venrock. “Venrock has a long history in the energy sector that started with Laurance Rockefeller in the 1930’s. As we continue to expand our portfolio and our team, Matthew adds deep and invaluable experience through his work at Lux Research and Forrester Research, and we are thrilled and privileged to have him join the Venrock team.” Nordan comes to Venrock from Lux Research, the advisory services firm where he served as president after co-founding the company in 2004. Under Nordan’s leadership, the Lux Research analyst team has become a globally recognized authority on the business and economic impact of emerging technologies, focusing on energy, the environment, and advanced materials. Nordan will remain an advisor to Lux, chairing the firm’s Research Advisory Council, which provides market-driven input on products and strategy. Earlier in his career, Nordan held a variety of senior management positions at emerging technology advisor Forrester Research in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Business-Of-Venture-Capital-1
    The Business of Venture Capital By Jeff Weinstein November 5th, 2020 What is Venture Capital? • A subset of private equity (investing in private companies for a piece of ownership) financing. • Typically (but not exclusively) focused on early-stage high risk, young technology companies since those companies often have the highest growth potential. • Unlike PE, typically take minority stakes in companies and do not exert control. • Many of the most important companies in the U.S. (and virtually all its important tech companies) were venture-funded. History of Venture Capital • Business model began with whaling in the mid 1800s. • Unpredictable, high-risk, high-reward venture. • Returns follow a power-law distribution. Most ships would lose money, but a few were VERY profitable, making it a profitable endeavor on the whole. • Investors would collect large pots of money and diversify across multiple whaling ships to generate massive returns. • Average whaling vessel spent 3 years at sea! • Captains would be compensated by keeping a percentage of the profits. Origin of carried interest! Modern VC Structure • VCs are managed by General Partners “GPs”. • GPs typically put in 2% of the total fund as GP commit. • Typical VC fund charges “2 and 20” : 2% per year Management Fee, 20% Carried Interest • 10 year lockup + options for two 1 year extensions • 3-5 year investment period (sometimes higher fees up front that lower during “harvest period” • Capital is committed in entirety but only “called” in small tranches over first 3-5 years • Both carried interest and partnership gains are taxed as long-term capital gains (lower than ordinary incomes) History of Venture Capital • First VC “fund” in 1946 with ARD (American Research and Development) Corporation and J.H.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2013 State of Entrepreneurship Address: Financing Entrepreneurial
    2013 STATE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP ADDRESS February 5, 2013 ©2013 by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. All rights reserved. INTRODUCTION Financing Entrepreneurial Growth fter three decades of relatively steady levels of entrepreneurial activity in the United States, the number of new businesses dropped sharply in 2008 and 2009, and has yet to fully rebound. A close look at available data indicates, however, that the rate of American entrepreneurship began to drop even before the Great Recession. Moreover, the rate of A 1 job creation from new businesses also fell significantly during this time. Despite these troubling trends, pockets of intense entrepreneurial activity exist in places such as Silicon Valley, Boston, and New York City. Observers there, in fact, fret instead about a new startup bubble. While trends may diverge based on geography and other factors, there seems to be a national consensus that encouraging entrepreneurship is part of the answer to our sluggish economic recovery. To wit, nearly every area of the country has invested resources in promoting entrepreneurship, introducing scores of new programs aimed at training, or helping entrepreneurs. Divergent trends also characterize entrepreneurial finance and the extent to which new, young, and growing firms can access the capital they need to start and grow their businesses. Amidst a stumbling macroeconomic environment, the past few years have seen tremendous ferment and innovation in entrepreneurial finance, particularly at the early stage of business creation.2 This activity potentially will lead to higher levels of entrepreneurship, but it also necessitates a thoughtful regulatory approach. The United States took a significant step toward changing the regulatory environment for entrepreneurial finance in the spring of 2012 with the passage of the Jumpstart Our Businesses (JOBS) Act, which included provisions for equity crowdfunding.
    [Show full text]
  • Nova Law Review
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NSU Works Nova Law Review Volume 42, Issue 3 2018 Article 3 Equity Crowdfunding Portals Should Join And Enhance The Crowd By Providing Venture Formation Resources Jeff Thomas∗ ∗Central Michigan University Copyright c 2018 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr Thomas: Equity Crowdfunding Portals Should Join And Enhance The Crowd By EQUITY CROWDFUNDING PORTALS SHOULD JOIN AND ENHANCE THE CROWD BY PROVIDING VENTURE FORMATION RESOURCES JEFF THOMAS* I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................... 375 II. WHAT VENTURE FORMATION RESOURCES COULD INCLUDE........ 378 A. haracteristics of nite tates’ it rofne Companies ........................................................................ 379 B. Resources Used by Venture Capital-Backed Companies ........................................................................ 381 C. One Size Does Not Fit Allbut It Fits Many.................... 385 D. Different Platforms for Different Types of Ventures......... 390 III. PROVIDING RESOURCES WITHOUT PRACTICING LAW................... 392 IV. BENEFITS OF PORTALS PROVIDING VENTURE FORMATION RESOURCES .................................................................................... 395 A. An Assembly Line That Reduces Transaction Costs ......... 395 B. An Engine That Accelerates Growth and Creates Wealth ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NEWS RELEASE for Immediate Release MEDIA CONTACTS: Courtney Walker Edelman 212-704-8102 [email protected] Katie Wood E
    NEWS RELEASE For Immediate Release MEDIA CONTACTS: Courtney Walker Edelman 212-704-8102 [email protected] Katie Wood Edelman 312-240-2827 [email protected] IKARIA AND INVESTOR GROUP TO ACQUIRE INO THERAPEUTICS IN $670 MILLION CASH AND STOCK MERGER, CREATING A WORLD LEADER IN CRITICAL CARE THERAPEUTICS Combined Company Will Have More Than $160 Million in Revenue, Significant Earnings and a High-Potential Product Pipeline Based On Breakthrough Research in Hydrogen Sulfide, Nitric Oxide, Carbon Monoxide and Other Novel Drug Candidates Innovative Transaction is Led by New Mountain Capital, ARCH Venture Partners, Venrock Associates, 5AM Ventures and Black Point Group Seattle and Clinton, N.J., February 22, 2007 – Ikaria Holdings, a newly formed investment company, announced today the signing of a definitive agreement to combine Ikaria Inc., a biotechnology company, and INO Therapeutics, the world leader in gaseous drugs including inhaled nitric oxide for treatment of hypoxic respiratory failure in newborns. The transaction, valued at approximately $670 million, is being financed by a group of private equity and venture capital investors led by New Mountain Capital, ARCH Venture Partners and Venrock Associates. INO Therapeutics is being acquired from The Linde Group (Deutsche Börse: LIN), which will retain an equity position in the new entity. The combined company, which will be called Ikaria Holdings, will have a leadership position in therapeutic gases and critical care medicine, a high-growth, multi-billion-dollar market.
    [Show full text]