Upper North Toe River Watershed Action Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Upper North Toe River Watershed Action Plan Upper North Toe River Watershed Action Plan Avery, Mitchell, and Yancey Counties North Carolina Effective January 1, 2015 Prepared for the Blue Ridge Resource Conservation & Development Council, Inc. 26 Crimson Laurel Circle, Suite 2 Bakersville, NC 28705 Prepared by Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc. 37 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 December 2014 This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Page Key to Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................... v Executive Summary ...................................................................................... vii Acknowledgments ...................................................................................... xvii North Carolina 9-Element Plan Checklist .......................................................... xviii 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and History ......................................................................... 1 1.2 Why the Upper North Toe River is Impaired? ................................................ 4 1.3 Synopsis of Cause and Source of the Primary Stressor – Sediment ....................... 5 1.3.1 Other Stressors ............................................................................. 5 1.4 Why Care? ......................................................................................... 6 1.4.1 Environmental Factors ..................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Economic Factors ........................................................................... 6 1.4.3 Social Factors ............................................................................... 7 1.5 Watershed Partners and the Planning Process .............................................. 8 2. Watershed Characterization ...................................................................... 13 2.1 Geographic Location and Attributes ......................................................... 13 2.2 Population and Land Use Characteristics ................................................... 15 2.2.1 Population .................................................................................. 15 2.2.2 General Land Use Characteristics ....................................................... 15 2.2.3 Industrial Land Uses....................................................................... 17 2.3 Natural Resource Characteristics ............................................................. 20 2.4 Existing Plans and Programs................................................................... 22 2.4.1 Town ........................................................................................ 22 2.4.2 County ...................................................................................... 23 2.4.3 State ........................................................................................ 25 2.5 Organizations in the Watershed .............................................................. 26 3. Watershed Conditions .............................................................................. 29 3.1 What We Know from Existing Data ........................................................... 29 3.1.1 Water Quality Conditions ................................................................ 29 3.1.2 Biological Conditions ...................................................................... 35 3.2 What We’ve Learned about Current Watershed Conditions and Sediment Sources ............................................................................. 41 3.2.1 Turbidity Assessments .................................................................... 43 3.2.2 Windshield Surveys ........................................................................ 46 3.2.3 Streamwalks ............................................................................... 52 3.2.4 Stormwater ................................................................................. 57 3.2.5 Nonnative Invasive Plants ................................................................ 61 3.2.6 Unwooded Riparian Areas ................................................................ 64 3.2.7 Unpaved Roads ............................................................................ 67 3.2.8 Horticultural Operations ................................................................. 68 3.3 Synopsis of What We Know .................................................................... 69 Upper North Toe River Watershed Action Plan i December 2014 Blue Ridge RC&D Council, Inc. 4. Management Measures for Reducing Turbidity and Sedimentation ....................... 71 4.1 Watershed Management Goals ................................................................ 71 4.2 Stream Channel and Riparian Area Enhancement .......................................... 71 4.2.1 Stream Channel Restoration and Enhancement ....................................... 72 4.2.2 Riparian Area Vegetation Enhancement ............................................... 79 4.2.3 Channel Realignment ..................................................................... 80 4.3 Upland Management Practices ................................................................ 81 4.4 Stormwater Control Measures (SCMs; formerly BMPs) ..................................... 84 4.4.1 Simple Stormwater Control Measures .................................................. 85 4.4.2 Engineered Stormwater Control Measures ............................................. 87 4.4.3 Green Infrastructure Alternatives ...................................................... 95 4.4.4 Stormwater Control Measure Assessment .............................................. 97 4.4.5 Site Exhibits ...............................................................................100 4.5 Agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) ..........................................103 4.6 Pollutant Load Reduction Potential .........................................................104 4.6.1 Streambank Erosion ......................................................................104 4.6.2 Upland Disturbances .....................................................................106 4.6.3 Stormwater Control Measures ..........................................................106 4.7 Government Practices and Programs .......................................................110 4.8 Land Conservation .............................................................................110 4.9 Education and Outreach Plan ................................................................111 4.9.1 Partners ....................................................................................111 4.9.2 Goals and Objectives ....................................................................113 4.10 Additional Watershed Assessments..........................................................121 4.10.1 Supplemental Sediment Source Assessments .........................................121 4.10.2 Other Water Quality Assessments ......................................................122 4.11 Watershed Monitoring .........................................................................123 4.11.1 Turbidity and Water Chemistry Monitoring ...........................................123 4.11.2 Ecological Monitoring ....................................................................123 4.11.3 Stewardship Monitoring .................................................................124 4.12 Watershed Coordinator - Importance and Need ...........................................126 5. Implementation Strategy ........................................................................ 127 5.1 Overview ........................................................................................127 5.2 Accomplishments to Date ....................................................................127 5.2.1 Education and Outreach Plan ...........................................................127 5.2.2 Recently Completed Projects and Projects in Progress .............................129 5.2.3 Agricultural BMPs Projects ..............................................................130 5.3 Action Plan .....................................................................................130 5.4 Implementation Schedule and Accomplishments Tracking ..............................141 6. References ......................................................................................... 147 7. Appendices ......................................................................................... 153 Upper North Toe River Watershed Action Plan ii December 2014 Blue Ridge RC&D Council, Inc. List of Figures Page Figure 1.1 North Toe River Project Area ................................................................ 3 Figure 2.1 Upper North Toe River Watershed Characteristics ...................................... 14 Figure 2.2 Installed Agricultural Cost Share Projects, 2004-2014 .................................. 24 Figure 3.1 Existing Sample Site Locations ............................................................. 31 Figure 3.2 Study Assessment Sites and Targeted Subwatersheds ................................... 42 Figure 3.3 Windshield Survey Data Collection Site Locations ....................................... 49 Figure 3.4 Catchment Imperviousness Classification ................................................. 58 Figure 3.5 Potential Stormwater Control Measure Locations ......................................
Recommended publications
  • French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009
    French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 What is a River Basin Restoration Priority? 1 Criteria for Selecting a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 2 French Broad River Basin Overview 3 French Broad River Basin Restoration Goals 5 River Basin and TLW Map 7 Targeted Local Watershed Summary Table 8 Discussion of TLWs in the French Broad River Basin 10 2005 Targeted Local Watersheds Delisted in 2009 40 References 41 For More Information 42 Definitions 43 This document was updated by Andrea Leslie, western watershed planner. Cover Photo: French Broad River, Henderson County during 2004 flood after Hurricanes Frances and Ivan French Broad River Basin Restoration Priorities 2009 1 Introduction This document, prepared by the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), presents a description of Targeted Local Watersheds within the French Broad River Basin. This is an update of a document developed in 2005, the French Broad River Basin Watershed Restoration Plan. The 2005 plan selected twenty-nine watersheds to be targeted for stream, wetland and riparian buffer restoration and protection and watershed planning efforts. This plan retains twenty-seven of these original watersheds, plus presents an additional two Targeted Local Watersheds (TLWs) for the French Broad River Basin. Two 2005 TLWs (East Fork North Toe River and French Broad River and North Toe River/Bear Creek/Grassy Creek) were gardens, Mitchell County not re-targeted in this document due to a re-evaluation of local priorities. This document draws information from the detailed document, French Broad River Basinwide Water Quality Plan—April 2005, which was written by the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Ecosystems
    February 19, 2014 Nantahala and Pisgah NFs Assessment Aquatic Ecosystems The overall richness of North Carolina’s aquatic fauna is directly related to the geomorphology of the state, which defines the major drainage divisions and the diversity of habitats found within. There are seventeen major river basins in North Carolina. Five western basins are part of the Interior Basin (IB) and drain to the Mississippi River and the Gulf of Mexico (Hiwassee, Little Tennessee, French Broad, Watauga, and New). Parts of these five river basins are within the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests (NFs). Twelve central and eastern basins are part of the Atlantic Slope (AS) and flow to the Atlantic Ocean. Of these twelve central and eastern basins, parts of the Savannah, Broad, Catawba, and Yadkin-Pee Dee basins are within the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs. As described later in this report, the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs, for the most part, support higher elevation coldwater streams, and relatively little cool- and warmwater resources. To gain perspective on the importance of aquatic ecosystems on the Nantahala and Pisgah NFs, it is first necessary to understand their value at regional and national scales. The southeastern United States has the highest aquatic species diversity in the entire United States (Burr and Mayden 1992; Williams et al. 1993; Taylor et al. 1996; Warren et al. 2000,), with southeastern fishes comprising 62% of the United States fauna, and nearly 50% of the North American fish fauna (Burr and Mayden 1992). Freshwater mollusk diversity in the southeast is ‘globally unparalleled’, representing 91% of all United States mussel species (Neves et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of the North Carolina Counties, 1663-1943 / by David Leroy Corbitt
    Avery 17 The boundary line between Ashe and Wilkes was authorized to be changed in 1931. That the boundary line between the counties of Ashe and Wilkes, be, and the same is hereby, changed so as to include all the A. L. Miller land lying South of the public road running along the top of the Blue Ridge Mountain, except the A. L. Miller residence which is not in Ashe County, 70 in the County of Wilkes. An act repealing chapter 425 of the Public-Local Laws of 1931 relative to the boundary line between Ashe and Wilkes was passed in 1933. 71 AVERY Avery County was formed in 1911 from Mitchell, Watauga, and Caldwell. It was named in honor of Colonel Waightstill Avery, a soldier of the Revolution and attorney general of North Carolina. It is in the northwestern section of the State and is bounded by the state of Tennessee and the counties of Watauga, Caldwell, Burke, McDowell and Mitchell. The present area is 247 square miles and the population is 13,560. Commissioners were named in the act establishing the county who were to select two or more sites for the county seat after which the county commissioners were to hold an election and the people were to vote on the sites. Whatever site was selected, it was to be called Newland. Newland, the county seat, was named in honor of W. C. Newland, then lieutenant governor of North Carolina. 72 Beginning at the highest point of Grandfather Mountain, the corner of Watauga, Caldwell and Mitchell counties, and running a direct line to the Hanging Rock Mountain; thence with the dividing ridge to the Turnpike
    [Show full text]
  • National Forests Non-Motorized Trail Strategy the US Forest Service Is Looking for the 82 People Who Attended
    SECOND QUARTER 2012 Quarterly News Bulletin and Hike Schedule P.O. Box 68, Asheville, NC 28802 • www.carolinamountainclub.org • e-mail: [email protected] National Forests non-motorized trail strategy The US Forest service is looking for the 82 people who attended. Some assistance. I wonder, though, if the group a few good men and women. Since the thoughts by CMC attendees: (bikers, horsemen, hunters, hikers, etc.) that majority of trail work is done by vol- Tish Desjardins, CMC Chair of provides the best grant assistance ends up get- unteers, the Forest Service is conduct- Conservation, said: “I thought it was ting what they want in the forest. With all the ing a number of workshops at various interesting that they are looking to us maintenance that CMC performs, it would be locations in Western North Carolina for possibly applying for grants for destructive if bikes or horses come along on to bring different types of trail users projects that we could apply for. They the hiking trails that we maintain. Hopefully together to provide input on trail plan- sure seem to be desperate for financial continued on page 7 ning. The diverse types of trail users include hikers, bikers, and horsemen. These people were brought together to share trail experiences, identify the types of trails that fit in a recreational context, and help develop a sustainable system of trail management. Initial workshops were held in Morganton, Andrews, Mars Hill, Franklin and Brevard. Several CMC members joined the 264 participants in the five meetings. Seventy diverse organizations were represented. The workshop in Brevard had to be moved to a larger location to accommodate Trail strategy participants at the meeting in Franklin.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin 5 French Broad
    BASIN 5 FRENCH BROAD Basin Description The French Broad Basin is one of six basins in North Carolina that drain the western slope of the Eastern Continental Divide and flow into the Mississippi River System emptying into the Gulf of Mexico. The basin is divided into the French Broad River, the Nolichucky River, and the Pigeon River sub-basins, none of which merge in North Carolina. The French Broad River begins in the mountains of Transylvania County and flows north entering Tennessee north of Hot Springs, NC. The Pigeon River drains Hayward County LWSPs were submitted by 23 public water systems paralleling Interstate 40 north of Canton, NC, and flows into having service area in this basin or using water from this basin. Tennessee. The Nolichucky River is formed by the These systems supplied 38.2 mgd of water to 202,596 persons. convergence of the North Toe River and Cane River north of DWR estimated that 200,084 of the 202,596 persons served by Burnsville, NC. This sub-basin drains the western slope of the these 23 LWSP systems received water from this basin. Of the Blue Ridge north from Mount Mitchell to the Tennessee state 38.2 mgd supplied by these 23 LWSP systems, 38.1 mgd line. The Nolichucky and Pigeon rivers merge with the French comes from water sources in the French Broad Basin, the rest Broad in Douglas Lake, east of Knoxville, Tennessee. These coming from wells in adjoining basins. three sub-basins drain 2816 square miles in North Carolina and about 1500 square miles in Tennessee upstream of Douglas 1992 LWSP SystemWater Use from Basin (mgd) Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Haven in Rocky Fork Hiawassee
    JOURNEYS THE MAGAZINE OF THE APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY January – February 2013 INSIDE: Safe Haven in Rocky Fork ❙ Hiawassee, Georgia ❙ Creative Collaboration ❘ JOURNEYS From thE EDitor THE MAGAZINE OF THE APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY Volume 9, Number 1 PRACTICAL MAGIC. WHEN I HEAR THE woRDs “MAGIC,” aNd “ENCHANTMENT” January – February 2013 to describe the Appalachian Trail, I think of another kind of magic that happens behind the scenes. Consider how closely the Trail skirts a densely-populated portion of the country; then consider any A.T. trailhead from Georgia to Maine a doorway to a peaceful, wooded path, strewn Mission with pristine waterways, grassy balds, and high ridge lines, and it does indeed sound like illusion The Appalachian Trail Conservancy’s mission is to preserve and manage the Appalachian Trail — ensuring — but the magic is real. that its vast natural beauty and priceless cultural heritage can be shared and enjoyed today, tomorrow, A recent letter sent to the Appalachian Trail Conservancy (ATC) headquarters especially and for centuries to come. punctuates this message. “In a way, it was like going back in time — leaving the modern and finding a much less complicated way of life alive in our country,” wrote ATC member Mary Holmes after completing her hike of the Trail. She continued with these Board of Directors A.T. Journeys poignant words: “The Trail is a miracle — first that it exists intact and J. Robert (Bob) Almand ❘ Chair Wendy K. Probst ❘ Managing Editor that it weaves through the most developed part of the country. It William L. (Bill) Plouffe ❘ Vice Chair Traci Anfuso-Young ❘ Graphic Designer should be an example in years to come of the value of conservation On the Cover: Kara Ball ❘ Secretary and inspire ever-greater conservation efforts.” The Trail is a model for “As winter scenes go, very few top the Arthur Foley ❘ Treasurer Contributors success, due to the serious and pragmatic work of the ATC staff beauty of fresh snow and ice clinging Lenny Bernstein Laurie Potteiger ❘ Information Services Manager members, A.T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Father-Son Appalachian Trail Adventure
    THE FATHER-SON APPALACHIAN TRAIL ADVENTURE ROAN HIGHLANDS June 24-27, 2021 CHEROKEE NATIONAL FOREST Appalachian Trail Adventure June 24-27, 2021 Dear Dad, The Father-Son Appalachian Trail Adventure is a 4-day backpacking trip across one of the most stunning sections of the Appalachian Trail. And, while we will be hiking during the hottest part of the summer, you can expect to experience cool temperatures on this mile-high ramble! The purpose of this trek is not to see how fast we can go but how deep we can go, so most days are fairly short in distance but long in meaningful experiences. During our time together you will not only strengthen your outdoor skills and nature knowledge but you will also be challenged to go deeper with God, yourself, and others. Plus you will have a special bonding experience with your son(s) that will last a life-time. Be prepared to be stretched in every way... but we'll have fun doing it! The basic itinerary is as follows... Thu, Jun 24 Drive to Carvers Gap and short hike to Roan High Knob Shelter Fri, Jun 25 Roan High Knob to Overmountain Shelter (7.1 miles) Sat, Jun 26 Overmountain Shelter to Doll Flats (6.2 miles) Sun, Jun 27 Doll Flats to Hwy 19E and drive home (3 miles) This information packet is designed to give you just enough information to help you prepare for the experience while intentionally not giving everything away! Here’s to Building Men… and their families, Marty Miller Blueprint for Men Blueprint for Men, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • President of the United States
    .ME’SS.hGE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, TRANSMITTIP;G A RmEPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE IN KEI,ATIOI\‘ TO THE l~ORESTS, lZI\‘lSltS, AND MOUNTAlNS OF THE SOlYl’HF,RN APPALACHIAN REGION. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1902. 5% th,r SL')Lcttr and I-lonfW ofR~~~/,~~~sc)ltltli,'eS: I transmit herewith a report of the Secretary of Agriculture, pre- pared in collaboration with the Department of the Interior, upon the forests, rivers, and mountains; of the Southern L4ppalachian region, and upon its agricultural situation as affected by t’lem. The report of the Secretary presents t#he final results of an investigation authorized by the last Congress. Its conclusions point unmistakably, in the judg- ment of the Secretary and in my own, to the creation of a national forest reserve in certain lyarts of the Southern States. The facts ascer- tained and here presented deserve the careful consideration of the Congress; they have already received the full attention of the scientist and the lumberman. They set forth an economic need of prime impor- tance to the welfare of the South, and hence to that of the nation as a whole, and they point to the necessity of protecting t,hrough wise use a mountain region whose influence flows far beyond its borders with the waters of the rivers to which it gives rise. Among the elevations of the eastern half of t.he United States the Southern ;Lppalachians are of paramount interest for geographic, hydrographic, and forest reasons, and, as a consequence, for economic reasons as well.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rdq 2009 Color.Indd
    Kyle/Cornn and Blue Carolina Mountain Club P.O. Box 68 THIRD QUARTER 2009 Asheville, NC 28802 Ridge Literacy Council Quarterly News Bulletin We ran an article recently about various CMC mem- bers who volunteered with community agencies. Many Return Service Requested and Hike Schedule Henderson County hikers volunteer their time and skills at the Blue Ridge Literacy Council. Here they teach oth- ers how to read or speak English. Recently we learned P.O. Box 68, Asheville, NC 28802 • www.carolinamtnclub.org • e-mail: [email protected] that fellow hiker and CMC member Kathy Kyle/Cornn has become Volunteer Coordinator for the council. Somehow this seems very appropriate. COUNCIL CORNER HAPPY BIRTHDAY GSMNP Hikers who volunteer their time at the council include On Friday, April 24, 2009 three CMC oring the park for its 75th anniversary. The Ted Connors, Jack Fitzgerald, Bruce Bente, Lucy Prim The CMC members, Danny Bernstein, Gerry Communications Committee created the and Rusty Breeding. These volunteer tutors have helped needs hike lead- McNabb and Janet Martin, attend- text and designed the CMC proclamation. adults who did not learn to read in a regular school ers. Currently ed the 75th Anniversary Governors’ Becky Smucker, our President, signed it. setting and those who are immigrants whose native we have about Proclamation Ceremony on Clingmans The proclamation will be stored in the language is not English. According to the National 75 leaders. As Smokies Park archives. Another copy will Assessment of Adult Literacy, 45 percent of the adult NEXT CMC COUNCIL MEETING the member- Dome. be stored with the rest of our CMC mate- population in Henderson County functions at non-liter- ship of CMC It was an invitation-only affair and CMC rial at UNCA.
    [Show full text]
  • Avery County
    C Match Line Match Line C Horse Creek Ridge Houston Ridge A C 1347 Match Line Match Line C 1161 1.00 194 A 105 1348 B FOREST B .41 1166 Match Rye Ridge Church of the Line 1177 .98 TENNESSEE Savior .30 NATIONAL 1.69 Belview 1167 Missionary 1161 1315 1342 Baptist .64 1342 Church .06 CARTER COUNTY Horse .40 Stover Ridge Match Match Line Grandfather .45 Camp Ridge .29 Village 1166 19E .10 Lewis Chapel 1167 Chestnut Flat Ridge Belview Mountain Line Freewill Baptist 1315 Pop. 25 .26 Elevation 4,500ft. 1205 1346 Church Cr. 1.63 Big Yellow Mountain High Point Cliff 1377 3.36 .37 .37 Line Elevation 5,460ft. Match 1.60 .45 Hartley Gap .42 1347 1.47 1160 Elk Hollow Ridge 1199 1.35 A Loggy Gap 1160 1344 1346 St. Bernadette Blood Camp Ridge Catholic Church Sandbank Ridge .32 .20 1132 Fork Mountain B Creek Bear Ridge PISGAH Elevation 3,970ft. B 1159 1353 Loggy Ridge .47 1162 1349 C h e 1186.20 .15 s t 1166 .45 n u t .42 O .52 Sugar Mountain a Hartley Ridge 105 1.11 Sugarcamp Ridge .38 Baptist Church k .03 Beechey Ridge R Minneapolis i d g e 1180 .34 .24 1157 Linville Bluffs Perry Ridge .20 Roaring Match Match Line 1348 .18 B i 1165 Fork Mountain g 1.41 Cemetery 1342 .08 R .39 1159 .15 1.03 o .30 2.54 a 1159 .41 .27 n 2.00 PARKWAY R .25 i Cliff Hill 1157 221 d Elevation 3,880ft.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL FORESTS /// the Southern Appalachians
    NATIONAL FORESTS /// the Southern Appalachians NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH CAROLINA, TENNESSEE » » « « « GEORGIA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE National Forests in the Southern Appalachians UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OE AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE SOUTHERN REGION ATLANTA, GEORGIA MF-42 R.8 COVER PHOTO.—Lovely Lake Santeetlah in the iXantahala National Forest. In the misty Unicoi Mountains beyond the lake is located the Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest. F-286647 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OEEICE WASHINGTON : 1940 F 386645 Power from national-forest waters: Streams whose watersheds are protected have a more even flow. I! Where Rivers Are Born Two GREAT ranges of mountains sweep southwestward through Ten­ nessee, the Carolinas, and Georgia. Centering largely in these mountains in the area where the boundaries of the four States converge are five national forests — the Cherokee, Pisgah, Nantahala, Chattahoochee, and Sumter. The more eastern of the ranges on the slopes of which thesefo rests lie is the Blue Ridge which rises abruptly out of the Piedmont country and forms the divide between waters flowing southeast and south into the Atlantic Ocean and northwest to the Tennessee River en route to the Gulf of Mexico. The southeastern slope of the ridge is cut deeply by the rivers which rush toward the plains, the top is rounded, and the northwestern slopes are gentle. Only a few of its peaks rise as much as a mile above the sea. The western range, roughly paralleling the Blue Ridge and connected to it by transverse ranges, is divided into segments by rivers born high on the slopes between the transverse ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Smithfield Review Volume VIII, 2004 Index
    INDEX TO VOLUME VIII Index to VolumeVIII Abb's Valley, Virginia .......................................................................................... 61 Abingdon, Virginia ....................................................................................... 10, 13 Acoste (province) ............................................................................................... 87 Ajacan (aboriginal land) .................................................................................... 96 Alexander (Allicksander), John D., Capt .......................................................... 19 Alger, Horatio ..................................................................................................... 41 Amos,? ............................................................................................................... 23 Anderson, Eldred, Rev ............................................................................ 11, 13, 22 Archeological investigations at Saltville ........................................................ 77-8 Army of Tennessee ............................................................................................. 18 Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities (APVA) .......... 31, 36- 7 Atlanta, Georgia ................................................................................................. 26 BaltimoreSun .....................................................................................................42. Bandera, notary .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]