Berkeley Bibliography

(1979-2019)

Abad, Juan Vázques. “Observaciones sobre la noción de causa en el opusculo sobre el movimiento de Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 35-44. Abelove, H. “George Berkeley’s Attitude to John Wesley: the Evidence of a Lost Letter.” Harvard Theological Review 70 (1977): 175-76. Ablondi, Fred. “Berkeley, Archetypes, and Errors.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (2005): 493- 504. _____. “Absolute Beginners: Learning Philosophy by Learning Descartes and Berkeley.” Metascience 19 (2010): 385-89. _____. “On the Ghosts of Departed Quantities.” Metascience 21 (2012): 681-83. _____. “Hutcheson, Perception, and the Sceptic’s Challenge.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2012): 269-81. Ackel, Helen. Über den Prozess der menschlichen Erkenntnis bei John Locke und George Berkeley. München und Ravensburg: Grin, 2008. Adamczykowa, Izabella. “The Role of the Subject in the Cognitive Process after George Berkeley: Passive for Active Subject?” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sklodowska, Sectio 1 Philosophia-Sociologia 6 (1981): 43-57. Adar, Einat. “From Irish Philosophy to Irish Theatre: The Blind (Wo)Man Made to See.” Estudios Irlandeses 12 (2017): 1-11. Addyman, David and Feldman, Matthew. “Samuel Beckett, Wilhelm Windelband, and the Interwar ‘Philosophy Notes’.” Modernism/Modernity 18 (2011): 755-70. Agassi, Joseph. “The Future of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” International Studies in Philosophy 7 (1975), 167-78. Aichele, Alexander. “Ich Denke Was, Was Du Nicht Denkst, Und Das Ist Rot. John Locke Und George Berkeley Über Abstrakte Ideen Und Kants Logischer Abstraktionismus.” Kant- Studien 103 (2012): 25-46. Airaksinen, Timo. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 9. _____. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (1987), 235-56. _____. “The Chain and the Animal: Idealism in Berkeley’s Siris.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 224- 43. _____. “The Path of Fire: The Meaning and Interpretation of Berkeley’s Siris.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 261-81. _____. “Berkeley and Newton on Gravity in Siris.” In Parigi (2010b), 87-106. _____. “Active Principles and Trinities in Berkeley’s Siris.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 57-70. _____. “Rhetoric and Corpuscularism in Berkeley’s Siris.” History of European Ideas 37 (2011): 23-34.

1 _____. “Light and Causality in Siris.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 91-118. _____. “Idealistic Ethics and Berkeley’s Good God.” In Farris et al. (2016), 218-36. _____. “In the Upper Room: Metaphysics and Theology in Berkeley’s Ethics.” Philosophy and Theology 27 (2015): 427-56. _____. “Vulgar Thoughts: Berkeley on Responsibility and Freedom.” In Charles 2015, 115-30. _____. “Berkeley’s Siris: An Interpretation.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 216-46. Airaksinen, Timo, and Belfrage, Bertil, eds. Berkeley’s Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2011. Airaksinen, Timo, and Gylling, Heta. “A threat like no other threat, George Berkeley against the freethinkers.” History of European Ideas 43 (2017): 598-613. Alejandra Manzo, Silvia. “Eter, espirito animal e causalidade no Siris de George Berkeley: uma visao imaterialista da analogia entre macrocosmo e microcosmo.” Scientiae Studia 2 (2004): 179-205. Alfonso, Louis, E. “The Notes on the Government and Population of the Kingdom of Naples and Berkeley’s Probable Route to Sicily.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 20-27. Alves, Pedro. “A Proposta (I) Modesta de Berkeley. Um Mundo Sem Matéria.” Philosophica 38 (2011): 59-74. Allaire, Edwin B. “Berkeley’s Idealism: Yet Another Visit.” In Muehlmann (1995), 23-38. Ameeri, Javed Iqbal. “Factors and Main Trends in Early British Empiricism. An Overview.” Journal of European Studies 8 (1992): 78-93. Ameriks, Karl. “Idealism from Kant to Berkeley.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 244-68. Anapolitanos, D. A. “The Continuous and the Discrete: Leibniz versus Berkeley and Locke.” Philosophical Inquiry 13 (1991): 1-24. Andersen, K. “One of Berkeley’s Arguments on Compensating Errors in the Calculus.” Historia mathematica 38 (2011): 219-31. Aramendia Muneta, Enrique. “La visión en Marr y Berkeley. El problema de perderse el principio de la película.” Daimon, Revista de Filosofia 59 (May-Aug 2013): 125-44. Arbour, Benjamin H. “God, Idealism, and Time: A Berkeleyan Approach to Old Questions.” In Cowan and Spiegel 2016, 127-152. Arbour, Benjamin H. and Trickett, Gregory E. “Evil Does Not Pose Any Special Problem for Berkeleyan Idealism: An Idealist Response to John DePoe.” Philosophia Christi 20 (2018): 567-80. Ariotti, Piero. “Benedetto Castelli and George Berkeley as Anticipators of Recent Findings on the Moon Illusion.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 9 (1973): 328-32. Ariso, José Marìa. “Sobre el riesgo de confundir el lenguaje cósmico de Kandinsky con el lenguaje divino del obispo Berkeley.” Agora 32 (2013): 95-106. Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “Proofs of the Existence of God.” In Garber (1998), 305-30. Armstrong, D. M. “The Heart of Berkeley’s Metaphysics: a Reply to Ernest Sosa.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 162-64. Arsi’c, Branka. The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.

2 Asfour, Amal and Williamson, Paul. “Splendid Impositions: Gainsborough, Berkeley, Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 31 (1998): 403-32. Asher, W. O. “Berkeley on Absolute Motion.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987): 447-66. Aston, Nigel. “Rationalism, the Enlightenment, and Sermons.” In The Oxford Handbook of the British Sermon 1689-1901, eds. Keith A. Francis, William Gibson, John Morgan-Guy, Bob Tennant, and Robert H. Ellison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Astore, Rocco A. “Doubting Descartes: How Berkeley’s Immaterialism Outshines the Cartesian System.” Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 10 (2018): 111-117. Atherton, Margaret. “The Coherence of Berkeley’s Theory of Mind.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1983): 389-400. _____. Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990. _____. “Corpuscles, Mechanism, and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 47-67. _____. “Berkeley without God.” In Muehlmann (1995), 231-48. _____. “Lady Mary Shepherd’s Case against George Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1996): 347-66. _____. “How to write the History of Vision: Understanding the Relationship between Berkeley and Descartes.” In Levin (1997), 139-66. _____, ed. The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999. _____. “Apprendre à voir: les enseignements de la Défense de la Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz (2003), 135-57. _____. “Comment Berkeley parvient à maintenir que la neige est blanche.” In Charles (2004), 127- 44. _____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision and Its Reception.” In Winkler (2005), 94-124. _____. “The Objects of Immediate Perception.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 107-19. _____. “ ‘The Books Are in the Study as Before’: Berkeley’s Claims About Real Physical Objects.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 85-100. _____. “Doctor Johnson Kicks the Stone, or Can the Immaterialisms of the Principles and Three Dialogues Be Reconciled?” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 87 (Nov 2013): 44-59. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Idealism by Georges Dicker. Mind 122 (2013): 278-81. _____. “Berkeley and Skepticism.” In Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present, edited by Diego W. Machuca and Baron Reed. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018. Pp. 369-79. _____. Berkeley. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2019. Ayers, Michael R. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and Kant’s Transcendental Idealism.” In Idealism Past and Present, ed. Godfrey Vesey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 51- 69. _____. “Berkeley and the Meaning of Existence.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 567-74. _____. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003-61. _____. “Ideas and Objective Being.” In Garber (1998), 1062-1107.

3 _____. “Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?” In Winkler (2005), 34-62. _____. “Berkeley, Ideas, and Idealism.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 11-28. Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003- 1061. Baber, H. E. “Berkeley and the Tattletale Paradox.” Idealistic Studies 19 (1989): 79-82. Bahr, Fernando. Review of Siris: Empirismo e idealismo platónico en el siglo XVII, ed. and trans. by Jorge L. Martin. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía 38 (2012): 123-24. Baier, Annette. “The Intentionality of Intentions.” Review of Metaphysics 30 (1977): 389-414. Baladi, Naguib. “Plotin et l’immatérialisme de Berkeley: témoignage de la Siris.” In Plotino e il neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, ed. Enrico Cerulli. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1974, 597-604. Baldwin, Louis. Portraits of God: Word Pictures of the Deity from the Earliest Times through Today. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2012. Barber, Kenneth F. and Gracia, Jorge J. E., eds. Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, 1994. Bardout, Jean-Christophe. “Berkeley et les métaphysiques de son temps.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 119-139. Bar-On, A. Z. “Husserl’s Berkeley.” Analecta Husserliana 16 (1983): 353-63. Barnouw, Jeffrey. “The Two Motives Behind Berkeley’s Expressly Unmotivated Signs: Sure Perception and Personal Providence.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 145-77. Baum, Robert J. “The Instrumentalist and Formalist Elements of Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3 (1972): 119-34. Baxter, Donald. “Berkeley, Perception and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1991): 85-98. _____. “Abstraction, Inseparability and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1997): 307-30. Beal, M. W. “Berkeley’s Deletions.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1976): 455-78. Belfrage, Bertil. “A New Dating of Berkeley’s Draft Introduction.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 10-11. _____. “Notes by Berkeley on Moral Philosophy.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 4-7. _____. Review of Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries, edited by George Thomas. Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 10. _____. Review of George Pitcher, Berkeley. Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 10. _____. “A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics in a Hitherto Unpublished Berkeleian Manuscript.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 1-4. _____. Review of Berkeley, Philosophisches Tagebuch, translated by Wolfgang Breidert. Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 17-19. _____. Review of George Berkeley in America by Edwin S. Gaustad. Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 16-17. _____. “Corrigenda to ‘A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics’.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 19.

4 _____. Review of Berkeley, Drei Dialogen zwischen Hulas und Philonous. Introduced by Wolfgang Breidert. Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 17. _____. “The Newport Extract of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 6-9. _____. “An Obscure Supplement to Volume One of Berkeley’s Works.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 17-21. _____. “Dating Berkeley’s Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 7-13. _____. “Facts Concerning Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 17-22. _____. “Strata in Berkeley’s Notebooks [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10-11. _____. “The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 117-26. _____. “The Order and Dating of Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 196-214. _____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708).” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643- 49. _____. “Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 319-30. _____. “Une nouvelle édition de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 367-72. _____, ed., George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. An editio diplomatica transcribed and edited with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Doxa, 1987. _____. “A Response to M. A. Stewart’s ‘Berkeley’s Introduction Draft’.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 1-10. _____. “The Constructivism of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992): 167-86. _____. “Berkeley.” In The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British Philosophers, ed. J. W. Yolton, J. V. Price, and J. Stephens. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999, 84-90. _____. “Vers une nouvelle interprétation de la Théorie de la vision de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 159-211. _____. “The Scientific Background of George Berkeley’s Idealism.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 202-23. _____. “Berkeley’s Four Concepts of the Soul (1707-1709).” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 172-87. _____. “The Theological Positivism of George Berkeley (1707-1708).” In Lemetti and Piirimäe (2007), 37-52. _____. “A Paradigm Shift in George Berkeley’s Philosophy 1707-1709.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 71-82. _____. “Berkeley’s Way towards Constructivism, 1707-1709.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 3-14. _____. “On George Berkeley’s Alleged Letter to Browne: A Study in Unsound Rhetoric.” Berkeley Studies 22 (2011): 3-8. _____. “Atomism in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 85-98.

5 _____. “The Mystery of Goodness in Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 141-57. Belfrage, Bertil, and Brook, Richard, eds. The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley. New York: Bloomsbury, 2017. Bellemare, Pierre and Raynor, David. “Berkeley’s Letters to le Clerc (1711).” Hermathena 146 (1989): 7-23. Benítez, Laura. “El espíritu como principio activo en Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 23- 34. Bennett, Jonathan. “On Translating Locke, Berkeley and Hume into English.” Teaching Philosophy 17 (1994): 261-69. _____. Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001. Benschop, Hans Peter. “Berkeley, Lee and Abstract Ideas.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1997): 55-66. Benson, Charles. “Prior’s Authentic Narrative.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 14-15. Ben-Zeev, A. “Reexamining Berkeley’s Notion of Suggestion.” Conceptus 23 (1989): 21-30. Berchielli, Laura. “Conoscenza analogica e teoria del significato nell’Alcifrone. Novità e tradizione.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 383-92. Berlioz, Dominique. “G. Berkeley: ‘Of Infinites’.” Revue philosophique (1982): 45-57. _____. “ ‘To stand for’ et ‘to represent’ dans l’Introduction manuscrite de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 331-38. _____. Berkeley. Un nominalisme réaliste (Paris: J. Vrin, 2000). _____, ed. Berkeley: Langage de la perception et art de voir. Débats philosophiques. Paris: PUF, 2003. _____. “Vision et géométrie chez Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 145-61. _____, and Nef, Frederic. “Berkeley ou l’idée contre la représentation.” In Ong-Van-Cung (2006), 163-77. Berman, David. “Berkeley’s Letter to H. Clarke.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 9. _____. “Mrs. Berkeley’s Annotations in her Interleaved Copies of An Account of the Life of Berkeley (1776).” Hermathena (1977): 15-28. _____. “A New Berkeley Portrait.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 8-9. _____. “A Note on Berkeley and his Catholic Countrymen.” Long Room 16-17 (1978): 26-28. _____. “Berkeley’s Letter to Lord Orrey.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 12-13. _____. “Berkeley’s Departure for America: a New Letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 14. _____. “Berkeley’s Philosophical Reception after America.” Archiv fûr Geschichte der Philosophie 62 (1980): 311-20. _____. “Bishop Berkeley and the Fountains of Living Waters.” Hermathena 128 (1980): 21-31. _____. “Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (1981): 219-29. _____. “Did Berkeley Write Guardian 130?” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 10-13.

6 _____ and Berman, Jill. “The Fountains Portraits of Bishop Berkeley.” Apollo (1982): 76-79. _____. “Beckett and Berkeley.” Irish University Review (1984): 42-45. _____. Review of The Guardian, edited by John Calhoun Stephens” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 23-26. _____. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 215-22. _____. “George Berkeley: Pictures by Goldsmith, Yeats and Luce.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 9-23. _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Revolution: 19 November 1707 — 11 January 1708.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 603-8. _____. “Berkeley’s Siris and the ‘Whiskey Patriots’.” Eighteenth-Century Ireland 1 (1986): 200- 203. _____. “The Jacobitism of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 309-19. _____, ed. George Berkeley. Eighteenth-Century Responses. New York-London: Garland, 1989, 2 vols. In Pitcher (1988-1989). _____, ed. George Berkeley, Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher: in Focus. New York: Routledge, 1993. _____. George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994. _____. Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. London and New York: Continuum, 2005. _____. “Berkeley’s Life and Works.” In Winkler (2005), 13-33. _____. “The Distrustful Philosopher: Berkeley between the Devils and the Deep Blue Sea of Faith.” In Parigi (2010b), 141-57. _____. “The Birth of Scottish Philosophy from the Golden Age of Irish Philosophy.” Eighteenth- Century Studies 45 (2012): 379-92. _____. “Berkeley’s and Hume’s Philosophical Memoirs.” Philosophy Now 120 (June-July 2017): 28-29. _____ and Ross, Ian Campbell. “George Berkeley and the Authorship of The Memoirs of Signor Gaudentio di Lucca.” Irish University Review 41 (2011): 196-201. Bermudez, Jose Luis. “The Adequacy of Simple Ideas in Locke: A Rehabilitation of Berkeley’s Criticisms.” Locke Newsletter 23 (1992): 347-54. Bernabei, Andrea. “Il ‘cieco di Molyneux’: un problema di percezione visiva nella Francia illuminista.” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 30 (1975): 132-66. Bertini, Daniele, ed. Saggio su una nuova teoria della visione-Trattato sui principi della conoscenza umana by George Berkeley. Milano: R.C.S., 2004. _____, ed. Alcifrone by George Berkeley. Milano: R.C.S., 2005. _____. “Berkeley,” in Enciclopedia filosofica, edited by V. Melchiorre. Milano: Rizzoli, 2006, vol. II, 1205-13. _____. “Shaftesbury, Mandeville, Berkeley e il mito del contratto sociale.” Fenomenologia e Società 29 (2006): 128-45. _____. “Hume e l’immaterialismo.” Aquinas 49 (2006): 621-35. _____. Sentire Dio. L’immaterialismo come via per un’interpretazione mistica dell’esperienza. Assisi: Cittadella Editrice, 2007. 7 ______. “Berkeley and Gentile: A Reading of Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Idealistic Studies 37 (2007), 43-50. ______. “Μεστὰ πάντα σημείων: Plotinus, Leibniz, and Berkeley on Determinism.” In Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth, ed. Panayiota Vassilopoulou and Stephen R. L. Clark. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 211-27. ______. “Berkeley, Theology, and Bible Scholarship.” In Parigi (2010b), 123-39. ______. “La critica berkeleiana dell’autonomia morale.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 309- 18. ______. “A Case Against the Contemporary Taxonomy of Views on the Metaphysics of Freedom: Berkeley’s Account of Free Will and Agency.” Dialegesthai (2011). mondodomani.org/ dialegesthai/dbe01.htm. ______. “Ragioni scientifiche e ragioni teologiche nell’ ‘Argument from Design’: il caso di Berkeley.” Lo Sguardo 6 (2011). www.losguardo.net/public/archivio/ num6/articoli/201106. %20Daniele_Bertini_Berkeley_Argument_from_Design.pdf. _____. “George Berkeley.” APhEx: Portale Italiano di Filosofia Analitca 18 (2018): 1-27. Besedin, Artem P. “Theory of ideas of George Berkeley.” Voprosy Filosofii 9 (2014): 145-55. _____. “Berkeley on the Natural Laws of Society.” In Charles 2015, 37-52. _____. “George Berkeley’s Conception of Accountability.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 115-33. Bettcher, Talia Mae. “Berkeley on Self-Consciousness.” In Daniel, New Interpretations 2007, 179- 202. _____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, Ontology and the Elusive Subject. New York: Continuum Publishing, 2007. ______Berkeley: a guide for the perplexed. London, New York: Continuum, 2008. ______“Berkeley and Hume on Self and Self-Consciousness.” In Topics in Early Modern Philosophy of Mind, edited by Jon Miller. Netherlands: Springer (2009), 193-222. _____. “Abstraction: Berkeley Against Locke.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 135-55. _____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Mind: Some New Models.” Philosophy Compass 6 (2011): 689-98. _____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mind.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 397-420. Beyhl, Helmut. Bischof Berkeley, der Mann, der den gesunden Menschenverstand tanzen lässt: das ‘Problem’ des Beweises der Realität der Außenwelt. Ph. D. Diss. University of Berlin, 1990. Beyssade, Jean-Marie. “L’expérience du rêve et l’extétiorité (de Descartes à Berkeley).” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 111 (1986): 355-66. _____. “Philosophie et apologétique chez Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 377-84. Bird, Graham, ed. A Companion to Kant. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006. Blackith, Robert. “A Berkeleian Time-Warp.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 1-4. Blake, J. B. “Addenda to Keynes: a Bibliography of Berkeley.” Bibliographical Society of America Papers 73 (1979): 337-40. Blay, Michel. “Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal: Michel Rolle et George Berkeley.” Revue d’Histoire des sciences 39 (1983): 223-53. Blount, Douglas. “Idealism and Science.” In Cowan and Spiegel, 153-64. 8 Bolton, Martha Brandt. “Berkeley’s Objection to Abstract Ideas and Unconceived Objects,” in Sosa (1987), 61-81. _____. “Berkeley and Mental Representation: Why Not a Lockean Theory of Ideas?” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 77-106. _____. “Belief and Its Objects in Berkeley’s System.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 251-73. Boman, Eugene C. “Casting Out Beams: Berkeley’s Criticism of the Calculus.” New York State Mathematics Teachers’ Journal 60 (2010): 9-13. Bonk, Sigmund. Immaterialismus: Darstellung und Verteidigung von George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis und immaterialistischem Weltbild. München, 1990. _____. “George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 36 (1994): 268-83. _____. “George Berkeleys Nachweis einer gottlichen Vorsehung.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 39 (1997): 176-90. _____. “George Berkeley’s Theory of Time: ‘A-Total-Disaster’.” Studia Leibnitiana 29 (1997): 198-210. _____. “We see God”: George Berkeley’s Philosophical Theology. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1997. _____. Abschied von der Anima mundi: die britische Philosophie im Vorfeld der industriellen Revolution. Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1999. Boos, William. “Reflective Inquiry and ‘The Fate of Reason’.” Synthese 191 (2014), 4253-4314. Bordner, S. Seth “Berkeley’s ‘Defense’ of ‘Commonsense’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2011): 315-38. _____. Review of George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment, ed. Silvia Parigi. Philosophy in Review 32 (2012): 313-15. _____. “If We Stop Thinking about Berkeley’s Problem of Continuity, Will It Still Exist?” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (2017): 237-60. _____. “Immaterialism and Common Sense.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 343-54. _____. “If We Stop Thinking about Berkeley’s Problem of Continuity, Will It Still Exist?” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (2017): 237-60. Bordwell, Harold. “Make Patriotism Great Again.” Commonweal 143: 20 (12/16/2016): 30. Borges, Jorge Luis. “Berkeley’s Crossroads.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 5-12. Botterill, George. “God and First Person in Berkeley.” Philosophy 82 (2007): 87-114. Bouveresse-Quilliot Renée, ed. Cahiers d’histoire de la philosophie: Berkeley. Bourgogne: Centre Gaston Bachelard, 2000. Bowen, Timothy W. Ontological Commitment in George Berkeley and David Lewis: the Role of Common Sense. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Oxford, 2008. Bozovǐ c,̌ Miran. Der grosse Andere: Gotteskonzepte in der Philosophie der Neuzeit. Wien: Turia und Kant, 1993. _____; Klun, Branko; and Mervic,̌ Stojan. Vprasanjě Boga pri Berkeleyj: diplomska naloga. Ljubljana: [S. Mervic]̌ (2008). Bracken, Harry M. “Berkeley: Irish Cartesian.” Philosophical Studies 24 (1976): 39-51. _____. “Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 11 (1977): 227-45. 9 _____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat Missed [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10. _____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat Missed.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 63-80. _____. “On Some Points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987): 435-46. ______. Review of The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Reenchantment by Costica Bradatan. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 177. Bradatan, Costica. “Berkeley and Liber Mundi.” Minerva. An Internet Journal of Philosophy 3 (1999), University of Limerick, Ireland. _____. “Waiting for the eschaton: Berkeley’s ‘Bermuda Scheme’ Between Earthly Paradise and Educational Utopia.” Utopian Studies 14 (2003): 36-50. _____. “Philosophy as Palimpsest. In Search for an Immemorial Wisdom.” Existentia: An International Journal of Philosophy 14 (2004): 337-44. _____. “ ‘God is Dreaming You’: Narrative as Imitatio Dei in Miguel de Unamuno.” Janus Head: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Continental Philosophy, Literature, Phenomenological Psychology and the Arts 7 (2004): 453-46. _____. Review of The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett) by Branka Arsic.” Philosophy 24 (2004): 237-39. _____. “‘One is All, and All is One.’ The Great Chain of Being in Berkeley’s Siris.” In O’Gorman and Donald (2005), 63-82. _____. “George Berkeley’s ‘Universal Language of Nature’.” In Klaas van Berkel and Vanderjagt (2005), 71-84. _____. Introduction to George Berkeley, Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 2006. _____. “Rhetoric of Faith and Patterns of Persuasion in Berkeley’s ‘Alciphron’.” Heythrop Journal 47 (2006): 544-61. ______. The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Re-enchantment. New York: Fordham University Press, 2006. _____. “George Berkeley e a tradição platônica.” Trans. Jaimir Conte. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia 16 (2009): 257-84. _____. and Conte, Jaimir. “A filosofia como palimpsesto: conhecimento arquetípico em Siris.” Revista Litterarius 3, no. 13 (2014): 1-20. Bradshaw, D. E. “Berkeley and Hume on Abstraction and Generalization.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 5 (1988): 11-22. Brancacci, Aldo. “La teoria platonica delle idee nella ‘Siris’ di Berkeley.” La Cultura: Rivista di Filosofia e Filologia 54 (2016): 417-33. Brandt, Reinhard. “Historical Observations on the Genesis of the Three-dimensional Optical Picture.” Ratio 17 (1975): 176-90. Braund, Michael J. From inference to affordance: the problem of visual depth-perception in the optical writings of Descartes, Berkeley, and Gibson. St. Catharines, Ont.: Brock University, Dept. of Philosophy, 2008.

10 Bravo, Hamdi. “The Problem of Primary and Secondary Qualities in Locke and Berkeley” [in Turkish]. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences] 5 (2008): 59-80. Brayton, Alice. George Berkeley in Apulia. Boston: Merrymount, 1946 (republished 2007). Breidert, Wolfgang. “Corrigendum.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 13. _____. “Einleitung” to George Berkeley, Drei Dialoge. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1980. _____. “Die Rezeption Berkeleys in Deutschland im 18 Jahrhundert.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 223-41. _____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Fridericana Zeitschrift der Universität Karlsruhe 36 (1985): 3-13. _____. “On Some Marginal Signs in the Philosophical Commentaries.” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 7-8. _____. “With the Infinite God Against the Mathematics of Infinity [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 11-12. _____. “Berkeley’s De Ludo Algebraico and Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 12-14. _____. “Berkeley’s Kritik an der Infinitesimalrechnung.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1986): 185-91. _____. “On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany.” In Sosa (1987), 231-41. _____, ed., George Berkeley, Versuch über eine Theorie des Sehens und Die Theorie des Sehens .. verteidigt und erklär. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1987. _____. Review of Essays on Berkeley, eds. John Foster and Howard Robinson. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 69 (1987): 315-21. _____. “Schopenhauer und Berkeley.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 69 (1988): 373-85. _____. George Berkeley 1685-1753. Basel: Birkhauser, 1989. _____. “Berkeley, George.” In Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, vol. 2, 1994, col. 260. _____, Einleitung in George Berkeley, Alciphron oder der Kleine Philosoph. Trans. Luise und Friedrich Raab; ed. Wolfgang Breidert. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996. _____. “Berkeley’s Sources in Mathematics.” In Brykman (1997), 49-58. _____. “George Berkeley. Philosophie des Immaterialismus.” In Philosophen des 18. Jahrhunderts, edited by Kreimendahl and Lothar. Darmstadt, 2000, 68-86. _____. “Berkeley’s Defence of Infinite God in the Contrast to the Infinite in Mathematics.” In Koetsier and Bergmans (2005), 499-508. _____. “Berkeley Poeticized.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 214-29. _____. “Die Ambivalenz von Vorurteilen bei Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 287- 95. _____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 435-57. Breuninger, Scott Christopher. Morals, the Market, and History: George Berkeley and Social Virtue in Early Eighteenth-Century Thought. Ph. D. diss., University of Wisconsin, 2002. _____. “Rationality and Revolution: Rereading Berkeley’s Sermons on Passive Obedience.” New Hibernia Review 12 (2008): 63-86.

11 _____. Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. _____. “Planting an Asylum for Religion: Berkeley’s Bermuda Scheme and the Transmission of Virtue in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World.” Journal of Religious History 34 (2010): 414-29. _____. “Improving the Health of the Nation: Berkeley, Virtue, and Ireland.” In Charles 2015, 161- 76. Brolley, Kevin G. Review of Berkeley by J. O. Urmson. Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 22-23. Brook, Richard. “Berkeley, Causality and Signification.” International Studies in Philosophy 27 (1995): 15-31. _____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision, Transparency and Signification.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11(2003): 661-69. _____. “Berkeley, Bundles, and Immediate Perception.” Dialogue 44 (2005): 493-504. _____. “Is Geometry about Tangible Extension?” Berkeley Studies 20 (2009): 5-12. _____. “Non-Conscious Agency and Berkeley’s Theory of Signs.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 287-99. _____. “Berkeley and Proof in Geometry.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 51 (2012): 419-35. _____. “Berkeley and the Primary Qualities: Idealization vs. Abstraction.” Philosophia 44 (2016): 1289-1303. _____. “Berkeley and the Passivity of Ideas.” Iyyun 66 (2017): 59-74. _____. “De Motu: Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 158-73. _____. “Berkeley, Newton, Explanation, and Causation.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 21-32. Brower, Virgil W. “Religion and Repugnance: Empiricism, Political Theology, Projective Disgust.” In On Taste: Aesthetic Exchanges, ed. Lars Aagaard Mogensen and Jane Forsey. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2018. Pp. 53-68. Brown, Michael. “The Biter Bitten: Ireland and the Rude Enlightenment.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 45 (2012): 393-407. Brown, Stuart. “Leibniz on Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 13-14. _____. “Platonic Idealism in Modern Philosophy from Malebranche to Berkeley.” in Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context, eds. G.A.J. Rogers, J.-M. Vienne, and Yves Charles Zarka. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1997, 197-214. Brueckner, Anthony. “Idealism and Scepticism.” Theoria 77 (2011): 368-71. _____. “More on Idealism and Skepticism.” Theoria 80 (2014): 98-99. Brykman, Geneviève. “Berkeley: sa lecture de Malebranche à travers le Dictionaire de Bayle.” Revue internationale de philosophie 29 (1975): 496-514. _____. “Berkeley, lecteur et critique de Spinoza.” Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle 2 (1978): 173- 92. _____. “Le cartésianisme dans le De Motu.” Revue internationale de philosophie 3 (1979): 553-69. _____. “The Close Inspection of Words and Ideas in Berkeley’s Writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 9-10.

12 _____. “Abstracts of ‘Le Cartesianisme dans le De Motu’ and ‘Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 15. _____. “Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.” Recherches sur le XVIIème siècle 4 (1980): 157-66. _____. “Berkeley à Newport: 1729-1779.” Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle 4 (1980): 167-69. _____. “Berkeley et l’interieur absolu des choses.” Revue philosophique (1980): 421-32. _____. “Philosophy and Apologetics in Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 12-16. _____. “Le modèle visuel de la connaissance chez Berkeley.” Revue philosophique (1983): 427-41. _____. Berkeley: philosophie et apologétique. 2 vols. Lille: Atelier National de reproduction des thèses. Paris: Vrin, 1984. _____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 12- 13. _____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 127-37. _____. “Principe de ressemblance et hétérogénéité des idées chez Berkeley.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 242-51. _____. “L’esprit et les idées visuelles dans la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 585-91. _____. “Tricentenaire ‘Berkeley’: (1685-1985).” Revue de synthèse 109 (1988): 148-50. _____. “Berkeley et l’analogie des noms.” Les Etudes philosophiques 3-4 (1989): 445-54. _____. “Sensibles communs et sens commun chez Locke et Berkeley.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale (1991): 515-29. _____. Review of George Berkeley, De Motu, translated into Italian with an introduction by Mariapaola Fimiani. Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 17. _____. Berkeley et le voile des mots. Paris: Vrin, 1993. _____. “Vision, connaissance et ontologie chez Berkeley.” In Monti (1995), 121-37. _____, ed., Berkeley et le cartésianisme. Le Temps philosophique 2. Nanterre: Université Paris X- Nanterre, 1997. _____, ed. Rassemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique. Le Temps philosophique 6. Nanterre: Département de Philosophie, Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1999. _____. “Plaisir/douleur et passivité des idées dans l’immaterialisme de Berkeley. ” In Bouveresse- Quilliot (2000), 15-35. _____. “L’hétérogénéité des idées sensibles et le ‘langage de la Nature’ chez Locke et Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 17-46. _____. “On Human Liberty in Berkeley’s Alciphron VII.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 231-46. _____. “Berkeley, Spinoza and Radical Enlightenment.” In Parigi (2010b), 159-70. _____. “Courte vue et vision synoptique chez Berkeley.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 83-95. _____. “La liberté humaine dans le Dialogue VII de l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 331-40.

13 _____. “La sémantique dans le Dialogue VII.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 407-12. _____. “Short-Sightedness and Long-Sightedness in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 195-206. Bunnin, N. F. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996. Burnyeat, M. F. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.” Idealism Past and Present (1982): 19-50. _____. El idealismo y la filosofía griega: lo que Descartes vio y Berkeley pasó por alto, trans. Jesús Coll Mármol. Oviedo: KRK, 2015. Bustamante, Rodrigo. “La critica de Berkeley al infinito categorico.” Contrafuerte (1985): 28-34. Byrne, P. A. “Berkeley, Scientific Realism and Creation.” Religious Studies 20 (1984): 453-64. Caffentzis, C. George, Über die Ursachen von “The Querist”: Vademecum zu einem irischen Klassiker der politischen Ökonomie. Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen, 1999. _____. Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000. _____. “Medical Metaphors and Monetary Strategies in the Political Economy of Locke and Berkeley.” History of Political Economy 35 (2003: supplement): 204-33. _____. “Algebraic Money: Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics and Money.” Berkeley Studies 18 (2007): 3-23. _____. “Locke, Berkeley and Hume as Philosophers of Money. An Apology and Synopsis.” In Parigi (2010b), 57-71. _____. “Did Hume Read Berkeley’s The Querist?” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 157-74. Calazans, Alex. “Considerações a Respeito do Problema do Rigor Matemático em O Analista.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 391-418. _____. “Um panfleto de Berkeley contra pratica matemàticas de Newton e de Leibniz.” Revista Latino-Americana de Filosofia e História da Ciência 8 (2010): 623-32. Callahan, Eugene. “Was Berkeley a Subjective Idealist?” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 21 (2015): 157-84. _____. Review of Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World by Kenneth L. Pearce. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (2018): 218-21. Campagnola, Francesco. “George Berkeley e la teoria dell'analogia divina.” Nouvelles-de-la- Republique-des-lettres 2 (2006): 25-76. Campbell, John. “A Straightforward Solution to Berkeley’s Puzzle.” Harvard Review of Philosophy 18 (2012): 31-49.

Campbell, John, and Quassim Cassam. Berkeley’s Puzzle: What Does Experience Teach Us? New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Camporesi, Cristiano. “Aporie berkeleyane.” Rivista di filosofia 73 (1982): 471-73. Cantor, Geoffrey N. “Berkeley, Reid and the Mathematization of Mid-Eighteenth-Century Optics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 429-48. _____. “Two Letters Relating to Berkeley’s Social Circle.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 1-3. _____. “Berkeley’s The Analyst Revisited.” Isis 75 (1984): 668-83.

14 Carlin, Laurence. “Selecting a Phenomenalism: Leibniz, Berkeley and the Science of Happiness.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (2007): 57-78. _____. The Empiricists: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York: Continuum, 2009. _____. “Berkeley and Leibniz.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 254-67. Casini, Paolo. “Newton’s Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlightenment.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 42 (1988): 35-52. Cassam, Quassim. “Tackling Berkeley’s Puzzle.” In Perception, Causation, and Objectivity, eds. Johannes Roessler, Hemdat Lerman and Naomi Eilan. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Cates, Lynn D. “Berkeley on the Work of the Six Days.” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 82-86. Çetin, Ismail. “The ‘Language Metaphor’ and Its Implications in George Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal of Philosophy] 14 (2010): 123-30. Chaney, Edward. The Evolution of the Grand Tour since the Renaissance. London: Franck Cass, 1998. Charles, Sébastien. “L’abbé Raynal, author of an unnoticed review of Berkeley’s Dialogues.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 14-18. _____. “The Siris in the Age of Enlightenment: Panacea or Imposture?” Hermathena 168 (2000): 55-69. _____. “Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis Frederic Ancillon’s ‘Dialogue between Berkeley and Hume’ of 1796.” Hume Studies 27 (2001): 85-97. _____. “Ocasionalismo y modernidad: Berkeley, lector critico de Malebranche.” Praxis Filosofica 13 (2001): 27-42. _____. “Existence et temporalité au Siècle des Lumières: Turgot lecteur de Maupertuis et Berkeley.” Lumen 21 (2002): 45-59. _____. Berkeley au siècle des lumières: immatérialisme et scepticisme au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: J. Vrin, 2003. _____. “Berkeley occasionaliste malgré lui? De la causalité et de la volonté chez Malebranche et Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 73-88. _____, ed., Science et épistémologie selon Berkeley. Saint-Nicolas, Québec: Les Presses l’Université Laval, 2004. _____. “Berkeley and the Lumières: Misconception and Reconstruction.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 283-309. ______. “Berkeley polémiste: des Sérmons sur l’obéissance passive (1712) aux Maximes sur le patriotisme (1750)” The European Legacy 13 (2008): 413-24. _____. “Berkeley et Campailla: recontre infructueuse ou influence probable?” Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 88 (2009): 25-39. ______. “The Animal According to Berkeley.” In Parigi (2010b), 189-99. ______. “Berkeley et l’imagination.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 97-108. ______. “La réception de l’Alciphron en France au siècle des Lumières.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 371-79.

15 _____. “Berkeley et Campailla: rencontre infructueuse ou influence probable?” Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 88 (2009): 25-39. _____. “Foi, croyance et raison selon Berkeley.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 135-47. _____. “Matérialisme et immatérialisme dans la pensée anglaise du XVIIIe siècle: Berington versus Priestley.” Lumen: Selected Proceedings from the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies 32 (2013): 41-55. _____. “De Pascal à Locke: la reprise berkeleyenne des enjeux philosophiques concernant la tolerance religieuse et civile.” In Charles (2015), 177-90. _____, ed. Berkeley Revisited: Moral, Social and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2015. _____. “The Reception of Berkeley in Eighteenth-Century France.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 334-42. Chibeni, Silvio Seno. “As posições de Newton, Locke e Berkeley sobre a natureza da gravitação.” Scientiae Studia 11 (2013): 811-39. Cicekdagi, Caner. “Esse Est Percipi in Berkeley’s Book Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous.” Kaygi: Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal of Philosophy] 10 (2008): 115-26. Chibeni, Silvio Seno. “Berkeley: Uma física sem causas eficientes.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 357-90. _____. “Berkeley e o papel das hipóteses na filosofia natural Berkeley and the role of hypothesis in natural philosophy.” Scientiae Studia 8 (2010): 389-419. _____. “As posições de Newton, Locke e Berkeley sobre a natureza da gravitação.” Scientiae Studia 11 (2013): 811-39. Chinn, Ewing Y. “The anti-abstractionism of Dignana and Berkeley.” Philosophy East and West 44 (1994): 55-77. Chiurazzi, G. “Il problema della mediazione nella filosofia di George Berkeley.” Filosofia 49 (1998): 53-75. Clark, Stephen R. L., Money, Obedience, and Affection: Essays on Berkeley’s Moral and Political Thought. New York: Garland, 1989. _____. “Berkeley on Religion.” In Winkler (2005), 369-404. Clarke, Desmond M. George Berkeley: Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Clarke, Desmond M. and Wilson, Catherine, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Clasen, Uwe. Die Sehtheorien von René Descartes und George Berkeley im Spiegel der Geschichte der physiologischen Optik. Aachen: Tecn. Hochsch. Diss., 1997. Collingridge, D. G. “Berkeley on Space, Sight and Touch.” Philosophy 53 (1978): 102-105. Conley, Patrick T. Rhode Island’s Founders: from Settlement to Statehood. Charleston, SC: History Press, 2010. Conroy, Graham P. “George Berkeley and the Jacobite Heresy: Some Comments on Irish Augustan Politics.” Albion 3 (1971): 82.

16 Consiglio, Francesco. “Introducción al concepto de idea en la filosofía de George Berkeley.” Disputatio: Philosophical Research Bulletin 5 (2016): 283-96. Conte, Jaimir. “A Oposição de Berkeley ao Ceticismo.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 325-55. _____. “Uma visita a glândula pineal.” Revista Litterarius 15 (2016): 1-8. _____. “Sobre a imortalidade.” Revista Litterarius 17 (2018): 1-7. Cope, Kevin L. “Moral Travel and the Pursuit of Nothing: Vathek and Siris as Philosophical Monologue.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 18 (1988): 167-86. Copenhaver, Rebecca. “Berkeley on the Language of Nature and the Objects of Vision.” Res Philosophica 91 (2014): 29-46. Coutinho, Maurício C. “Os Escritos Econômicos de Berkeley.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 293-324. Cover, J. A. Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990. Cowan, Steven B. “What Is that Stone? Idealism and Particulars.” In Cowan and Spiegel (2016), 51-70. Cowan, Steven B. and Spiegel, James S., eds. Idealism and Christian Philosophy, vol. 2: Idealism and Christianity. New York: Bloomsbury, 2016. Cowan, Steven B. and Spiegel, James S. “Introduction.” In Cowan and Spiegel (2016), 1-10. Coxito, Amandio Augusto. “Un texto de Luis A. Vernei contra o imaterialismo de Berkeley.” Revista Filosofia de Coimbra 6 (1997): 101-17. Crain, Steven D. “Must a Classical Theist Be an Immaterialist?” Religious Studies 33 (1997): 81- 92. Creery, Walter E., ed., George Berkeley: Critical Assessments. 3 vols. London; New York: Routledge, 1991. Crombie, Alistair C. George Berkeley Bicentenary. New York: Garland, 1988. Cross, C. B. “Berkeley on Other Minds.” Auslegung 6 (1978): 45-50. Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter, eds. Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Company, 1992. _____. “Berkeley’s Ideas of Sense.” Nous 9 (1975): 55-72. _____. “Berkeley’s Unstable Ontology.” Modern Schoolman 67 (1989): 15-32. _____. “Sections Nine and Ten of Berkeley’s Principles.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 1-5. _____. “Berkeley on Minds and Agency.” In Winkler (2005), 190-229. _____.”Perceiving and Berkeley’s Theory of Substance.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 121-52. Curtin, Thomas. “Divine Analogy in Eighteenth-Century Irish Philosophy.” Journal of Theological Studies 65 (2014): 600-624. Curtis, Benjamin L. “A New Look at Berkeley’s Idealism.” Heythrop Journal 50 (2009), 189-94. D’Agostino, Simone. Review of Berkeley’s ‘A Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge: An Introduction by Peter J. E. Kail. Gregorianium 97 (2016): 205-206.

17 _____. Review of Berkeley by Daniel E. Flage. Gregorianum 97 (2016): 422-24. Danaher, James P. “Is Berkeley’s World a Divine Language?” Modern Theology 18 (2002): 361-73. Dancy, Jonathan. Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987. _____, ed., George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. _____, ed., George Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. _____. “Berkeley, Descartes and the Science of Nature.” Harvard Review of Philosophy 20 (2014): 4-16. Daniel, Stephen H. “George Berkeley, Francis Suarez, and the Esse-Existere Distinction.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2000): 621-36. _____. “The Ramist Context of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2001): 487-505. _____. “Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist Logic.” Idealistic Studies 31 (2001): 55-72. _____. “Berkeley’s Pantheistic Discourse.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (2001): 179-94. _____. “Berkeley’s Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2001): 239-58. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials, ed. C. J. McCracken and I. C. Tipton. Philosophy in Review 21 (2001), 362–64. _____. “Les limites de la philosophie naturelle de Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 163-70. _____. “Berkeley’s Stoic Notion of Spiritual Substance.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 203-30. _____ “The Harmony of the Leibniz-Berkeley Juxtaposition.” In Leibniz and the English Speaking World, ed. Stuart Brown and Pauline Phemister. New York: Springer/Kluwer (2007), 163- 80. _____, ed. New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought. Journal of the History of Philosophy Books Series. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2007. _____, ed. Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. _____. Review of A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley by John R. Roberts. Berkeley Studies 18 (2007), 36–39. _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Treatment of Representation.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (2008): 41-55. _____. Review of The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Reenchantment by Costica Bradatan, The Scriblerian 41 (2009), 232–33. _____. Review of George Berkeley: Philosophical Writings, ed. Desmond M. Clarke. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2009.07.19. http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=16645. _____. “How Berkeley’s Works Are Interpreted.” In Parigi (2010b), 3-14. _____. “Berkeley and Spinoza.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 123-34. _____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Divine Analogy.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 149-61.

18 _____. “Stoicism in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 121-34. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Alciphron: English Text and Essays in Interpretation, eds. Laurent Jaffro, Geneviève Brykman, and Claire Schwartz. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 563-66. _____. “How Berkeley Redefines Substance.” Berkeley Studies 24 (2013): 40-50. _____. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Mind and the ‘Black List Hypothesis’: A Dialogue.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (2013): 24-41. _____. “Berkeley, Hobbes, and the Constitution of the Self.” In Charles (2015), 69-81. _____. “Berkeley on God’s Knowledge of Pain.” In Storrie (2018a), 136-45. _____. “Berkeley’s Non-Cartesian Notion of Spiritual Substance.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (2018), 659–82. _____. “Substance and Person: Berkeley on Descartes and Locke.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74, #4 (2018), 7–20. Daniel, Stephen, and Charles, Sébastien. “Montréal Conference Summaries.” Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 54-57. Darren, Hynes. “Berkeley’s Corpuscular Philosophy of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (2005): 339-56. Darwall, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Moral and Political Philosophy.” In Winkler (2005), 311-38. Dávid, B. “Berkeley kartezianizmusa és az önismeret két modellje” [Hungarian]. Magyar Filozofiai Szemle 57, no. 3 (2013): 30-49. Davis, John W. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (1960): 392-408. Dea, Shannon. “Peirce and Spinoza’s Pragmaticist Metaphysics.” Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia 15 (2014): 25-35. De Almeida Marques, José Oscar. “Berkeley e o Problema de Barrow.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 419-45. Dégremont, Roselyne. Berkeley. L’idée de nature. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1995. _____. Berkeley. Paris: Ellipses, 1999. _____. “Le principe de la morale.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 45-56. _____. Leçons sur la philosophie de George Berkeley. Paris: Ellipses, 2013. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Common Sense and Science by Marek Tomeček. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 141 (2016): 395. Dempsey, Liam P. “Newtonian Idealism: Matter, Perception, and the Divine Will.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (2014): 86-112. DePoe, John M. “Berkeley’s Master Argument for Idealism.” In Just the Arguments, eds. Michael Bruce and Steven Barbone. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, 68-69. _____. “Berkeleyan Idealism, Christianity, and the Problem of Evil.” Philosophia Christi 19 (2017): 401-413. De Waal, Cornelis. “The Real Issue Between Nominalism and Realism: Peirce and Berkeley Reconsidered.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996): 425-33.

19 ______. “Having an Idea of Matter: A Peircean Refutation of Berkeleyan Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (2006): 291-313. Diana, Rosario. “Disappartenenza dell’Io. Berkeley e Beckett.” Bollettino del Centro di Studi Vichiani 41 (2011): 55-70. _____. Esse est percipi: George Berkeley e Film di Samuel Beckett. Teatro-reading filosofico. Milano: Mimesis Edizioni, 2017. Dicker, Georges. “Two Arguments from Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1982): 409-22. _____. “Berkeley on the Immediate Perception of Objects.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 201- 13. _____. “Berkeley on Immediate Perception: Once More Unto the Breach.” Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2006): 517-35. ______. “Anti-Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 335-50. _____. Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. _____. “Berkeley on the Impossibility of Abstracting Primary From Secondary Qualities.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (2012): 23-45. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism by Samuel C. Rickless. Mind 122 (2013): 1183-87. _____. “Berkeley’s Critique of Locke’s Theory of Perception.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 268- 87. Di Michele, Stefano. “George Berkeley in America: nostalgia del vedere.” Annali della Facolta di Lettere e Filosofia 39 (1996): 141-63. Doney, Willis. “Is Berkeley’s a Cartesian Mind?” In Turbayne (1982), 273-82. _____. “Berkeley’s Argument Against Abstract Ideas.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1983): 295-308. _____. Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas. New York: Garland, 1989. Dooren, W. Van. “Whether There Be Any Reason Why Berkeley Is So Often Misunderstood?” Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappijen en wetenschap 26 (1985-86). Dougherty, Jude P. Review of Berkeley by Daniel E. Flage. Review of Metaphysics 69 (2016): 625- 26. Downing, Lisa J. “Berkeley’s Case Against Realism About Dynamics.” In Muehlmann (1995), 197- 216. _____. “Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (1995): 279-300. _____. “Berkeley’s Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science.” In Winkler (2005), 230-65. _____. “Occasionalism and Strict Mechanism: Malebranche, Berkeley, Fontenelle.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005), 206-30. _____. “Sensible Qualities and Secondary Qualities in the First Dialogue.” In Storrie (2018a), 7-23. Drebushenko, D. “Abstraction and a New Argument for the Esse-Is-Percipi Thesis.” Hermathena 167 (1999): 35-58.

20 Drunga, Mykolas. “Berkeley and the Time-Gap Argument.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 55- 75. D’Souza, Paul. “Salvation in Non-Christian Religions: Aristotle and Berkeley. Philosophical Contribution to a Theological Question.” Divyadaan 16 (2005): 17-32. Dubois, Pierre. L’oeuvre de Berkeley. Paris: Vrin, 1985. Dunlop, Katherine. “The Role of Visual Language in Berkeley’s Account of Generality.” Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 83 (2011): 525-59. Dunn, John; Urmson, J. O; and Ayer, A. J. The British Empiricists: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 1992. Dupas, Jean-Claude. “Le visible et l’invisibile chez Berkeley.” Études irlandaises (1986): 45-56. Eagleton, Terry. “What you see is what you get.” Review of The Correspondence of George Berkeley, ed. Marc Hight. London Review of Books 35, no. 8 (4/25/2013): 31-32. Easton, Patricia A., ed., Logic and the Workings of the Mind. Atascadero: Eastview, 1997. Eaton, Jeffrey C. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and the Scientific Promise of the Christian Doctrine of Creation.” Harvard Theological Review 80 (1987): 431-47. Eberwein, Robert. “Samuel Johnson, George Cheyne, and the ‘Cone of Being’.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (1975): 153-58. Echeverri Saldarriaga, Santiago. “‘Subjetividad’ e ‘immaterialismo’en la filosofia de George Berkeley.” Revista colombiana de filosofia de la ciencia 3 (2002): 179-208; republished in Estudios de filosofia 27 (2003): 127-48. Egan, Frances. “The Moon Illusion.” Philosophy of Science 65 (1998): 604-23. Eisenstein, G. “Berkeley’s Presence: Metaphysical Development and Dialectical Tension.” Idealistic Studies 18 (1988): 207-29. El-Bizri, Nader. “A Philosophical Perspective on Alhazen’s Optics.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 15 (2005): 189-218. Emundts, Dina. “Kant’s Critique of Berkeley’s Concept of Objectivity.” In Kant and the Early Moderns ed. Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008, 117-41. Enright, J. T. “The Moon Illusion Examined from a New Point of View.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 119 (1975): 87-107. Eric, Dietrich. “The Bishop and Priest: Toward a Point-of-View Based Epistemology of True Contradictions.” Logos Architekton. Journal of Logic and Philosophy of Science 2 (2008): 35-58. Esenyel, Adnan. “Idealism and Kant’s Conception of Space” (in Turkish). Kaygi: Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi (Uludag University Journal of Philosophy) 17 (2011): 149-62. Evans, J. D. G. “Berkeley on Conceiving the Unconceived.” Irish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1985): 79-93. Everitt, Nicholas. “Quasi-Berkelyan Idealism as Perspicuous Theism.” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 353-77. Falkenstein, Lorne. “Intuition and Construction in Berkeley’s Account of Physical Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994): 63-84.

21 _____. “Classical Empiricism.” In Companion to the Philosophy of Time, eds. Heather Dyke and Adrian Bardon. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. Pp. 102-19. _____. “Theories of Perception: Berkeley and his Recent Predecesors.” In Routledge Companion to Eighteenth Century Philosophy, ed. Aaron Garrett. New York: Routledge, 2014. _____. “Reid’s Critique of Berkeley’s Position on the Inverted Image.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 16 (2018): 175-91. Fârcaş, Daniel. “L’idéalisme ‘visuel’: Maître Eckhart et George Berkeley.” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Theologia Catholica 57 (2012): 5-24. Faris, J. A. Review of Berkeley: Critical and Interpretative Essays, ed. C. M. Turbayne. Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 26-32. Farris, Joshua R.; Hamilton, S. Mark; and Spiegel, James S., eds. Idealism and Christian Theology, vol. 1. New York: Bloomsbury, 2016. Fasko, Manuel. “A Scotist nonetheless? George Berkeley, Cajetan and the Problem of Divine Attributes.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 33-50. Fau, Martina. Berkeleys Theorie der visuellen Sprache Gottes: ihre Bedeutung für die Philosophie des Immaterialismus und ihre historischen Würzeln. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993. Fauske, Christopher J. “A Most Unlikely Friendship? Jonathan Swift, George Berkeley, and the Bonds of Philosophy with, Perhaps, an Answer to an Age-Old Problem.” Swift Studies 25 (2010): 146-62. Fedriga, Riccardo. “Oggetti e aspetti intenzionali nella teoria dell’astrazione di George Berkeley.” Dianoia: Annali di Storia della Filosofia 15 (2010): 147-66. Fennema, Scott. “George Berkeley and Jonathan Edwards on Idealism: Considering an Old Question in Light of New Evidence.” Intellectual History Review 29 (2019): 265-90. Feuer, Lewis F. “Materialism, Idealism and Science.” Philosophy of Science 15 (1948): 71-75. Fimiani, Mariapaola. George Berkeley: il nome e l’immagine. Cosenza: Lerici, 1979. Fields, Keota. Berkeley: Ideas, Immaterialism, and Objective Presence. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2011. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism by Samuel Rickless. Philosophical Quarterly 64 (2014): 170-72. _____. “Berkeley and Hume on the Imagination.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 314-33. _____. “Berkeley’s Semiotic Idealism.” In Storrie (2018a), 61-83. Fincham, R. M. “Transcendental Idealism and the Problem of the External World.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2011): 221- 41. Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley’s Notions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1985): 407-25, reprinted in George Berkeley: Critical Assessments, edited by Walter E. Creery, London and New York: Routledge (1991), 404-24. _____.“Berkeley on Abstraction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 483-501; reprinted in Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas, edited by Willis Doney, in The Philosophy of George Berkeley Series, New York: Garland (1988). _____. Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions: a Reconstruction Based on his Theory of Meaning. London: Croom Helm, 1987. _____. “Relative Ideas and Notions.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 235-53.

22 _____. “Berkeley, Individuation and Physical Objects.” In Barber and Gracia (1994), 133-54. _____. “George Berkeley.” In The Encyclopedia of Empiricism, edited by Don Garrett and Edward Barbanell. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press (1997), 44-55. _____. “Berkeley’s Archetypes.” Hermathena 171 (2001): 7-31. _____. “Berkeley’s Principles, Section 10.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2003): 543- 51. _____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Principles.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 25-60. _____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006). http://www. utm.edu/research/iep/b/berkeley.htm. _____. “Berkeley’s Ideas of Reflection.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006): 7-13. _____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Three Dialogues.” In Daniel (2008), 45-75. _____. “Was Berkeley and Ethical Egoist?” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008): 3-18. _____. “Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 361-72. _____. “Remarks on Professor Grandi’s Comments.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 379-80. _____. “Analysis in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 35-53. _____. Berkeley. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2014. _____. “Can Berkeley Have It Both Ways?” The Philosophers’ Magazine 66, no. 3 (2014): 55-60. _____. “Ethics in Alciphron.” In Charles 2015, 53-68. _____. “Is Berkeley’s God Omnipotent?” Review of Metaphysics 71 (2018): 703-21. _____. “Rickless and Passive Obedience.” Berkeley Studies 28 (2019): 23–47. Fleming, N. “Berkeley and Idealism.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 300-325. ______. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Principles.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 25-60. ______.“Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Three Dialogues.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007): 47-75. Fleming, Patrick. “Berkeley’s Immaterialist Account of Action.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2006): 415-29. Flew, Anthony. “Was Berkeley a Precursor of Wittgenstein?” In Berman (1993), 214-26. Fogelin, Robert. “Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite Divisibility.” Philosophical Review 97 (1988): 47-69. _____. “The Intuitive Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 331-44. _____. Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge, 2001. Forest, Denis. “Language visuel, communication universelle.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 4 (1997): 429-46. Foster, John and Robinson, Howard, eds., Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.

23 Fourny-Etchegaray, Claire. “Note sur les rapports entre raison et sens commun chez Stillingfleet et Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 357-60. ______. “Les diverses conceptions du sens commun et de son role dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 393-405. Fox, Christopher. “Locke and the Scriblerians: the Discussion of Identity in Early Eighteenth Century England.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 16 (1982): 1-25. Frangiotti, Marco Antonio. “Transcendental Idealism and Phenomenalism.” Critica 26 (1994): 73- 95. Frankel, Henry. “Berkeley’s Concept of Mind as Presented in Book II of the Principles.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (1977): 37-51. Frankel, Melissa. “Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning, and Minds.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 381-402. _____. “Berkeley, Meaning and Minds: Remarks on Glezakos’ Comments.” Philosophia 37 (2009), 409-413. _____. “Berkeley and God in the Quad.” Philosophy Compass 7 (2012): 388-96. _____. Review of Berkeley: Ideas, Immaterialism, and Objective Presence by Keota Fields. Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 46-50. _____. “Acts, Ideas, and Objects in Berkeley’s Metaphysics.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (2013): 475-93. _____. “Revisiting Berkeley’s Perceptual Relativity Argument.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 30 (2013): 161-76. _____. Review of Berkeley by Daniel E. Flage. Berkeley Studies 25 (2014): 16-19. _____. “Actions, Behaviours and Volitions in Berkeley’s Moral Philosophy.” In Charles (2015), 99-114. _____. “Berkeley on the ‘Twofold State of Things’.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (2016): 43-60. _____. “The Cartesian Roots of Berkeley’s Account of Sensation.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (2017): 214-31. _____. Review of Language and the Structure of Berkeley's World by Kenneth L. Pearce. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/language-and-the-structure-of- berkeleys-world/, 2017.12.14. Frederick, Danny. “The Good Bishop and the Explanation of Political Authority.” De Ethica: A Journal of Philosophical, Theological and Applied Ethics 3, no. 2 (2016): 23-35. Frederick, R. “Berkeley and the Argument from Conceiving.” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987/88): 481-87. Frey, Christopher. Review of Berkeley's Puzzle: What Does Experience Teach Us? by John Campbell and Quassim Cassam. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, http://ndpr.nd.edu/ news/berkeley-s-puzzle-what-does-experience-teach-us/, 2015.07.24. Friedman, Lesley. “Pragmatism: the Unformulated Method of Bishop Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003): 81-96. Fugate, Courtney David. “Berkeley’s Aesthetic of Transcendence.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 92-117.

24 Furlong, E. J. “A Berkeleian Nod?” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 3. _____. “Some Puzzles in Berkeley’s Writings.” Hermathena 120 (1976): 63-73. _____. and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and The Ladies Library.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 4-13. Ganson, Todd; and Ganson, Dorit. “Everyday Thinking about Bodily Sensations.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2010), 523-34. Garber, Daniel, and Ayers, Michael R., eds. The Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. ______, and Longuenesse, Béatrice (eds.). Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press (2008). Garcia Varas, Ana. “Ideas e imagenes: un estudio de la teoria de las ideas abstractas en Hume.” Revista de Filosofia 66 (2010): 93-106. Garrett, Aaron. Berkeley's Three dialogues: a reader's guide. New York: Continuum, 2008. Garrett, Don. “Hey, What’s the Big Idea? Berkeley and Hume on Extension, Local Conjunction, and the Immateriality of the Soul.” In Storrie (2018a), 191-204. Gatti, Andrea, Inglesi a Napoli nel viceregno austriaco: Joseph Addison, Lord Shaftesbury, George Berkeley. Napoli: Vivarium/Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2000. _____, and Pugliese Carratelli, G. “Per una storia intellettuale dell'eta Augustea in Inghilterra: Il Catalogue della biblioteca di Joseph Addison.” Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 14 (2003): 224-39. Gaukroger, Stephen, ed. The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991. Gaustad, Edwin S. “George Berkeley and the New World Community.” Church History 48 (1979): 5-17. _____. George Berkeley in America. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979. _____. “When in the Course.” William and Mary Quarterly 52 (1995): 479-82. Gerbier, Laurent. “Le dialogisme de Berkeley: Lecture comparée du Traité des principes (1710) et des Trois dialogues entre Hylas et Philonous (1713).” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 39 (2003): 397-409. Gersh, Stephen and Moran, Dermot, eds., Eriugena, Berkeley and the Idealist Tradition. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006. Ghosh, Kuntal and Bhaumik, Kamales. “Complexity in human perception of brightness: a historical review on the evolution of the philosophy of visual perception.” OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences 10 (2010): 17-35. Gibson, Ann and Palmer, Lucia. “George Berkeley’s Visual Language and the New England Portrait Tradition.” Centennial Review 31 (1987): 122-45. Gilgulin, Robert; and Kerr, Kristine. “Letters to the Editor: Berkeley’s Clouds of Dust.” Philosophy Now 107 (Apr/May 2015), 40-41. Girard, Jeremy. “La bonne société d’après Berkeley: entre education religieuse et coutume raisonnable.” In Charles 2015, 227-42. Giménez, Diego; and Rolandone, Roberto. “Borges y Pessoa: lectores de Berkeley.” Variaciones Borges 40 (2015): 23-39.

25 Girten, Kristin M. “Mingling with Matter: Tactile Microscopy and the Philosophic Mind in Brobdingnag and Beyond.” Eighteenth Century: Theory & Interpretation 54 (2013): 497- 520. Glasson, Travis. “‘Baptism doth not bestow Freedom’: Missionary Anglicanism, Slavery, and the Yorke-Talbot Opinion, 1701-30.” William & Mary Quarterly 67 (2010): 279-318. Glauser, Richard. “Les rélations de significance chez Berkeley.” Studia Philosophica 42 (1983): 165-200. _____. “Berkeley, Collier, et la distinction entre l’esprit fini et le corps.” In Brykman (1997), 91- 116. _____. Berkeley et les philosophes du XVIIe siècle: perception et scepticisme. Sprimont: Mardaga, 1999. _____. “La structure de la perception médiate dans la théorie berkeleyenne de la vision.” in Berlioz (2003), 103-34. _____. “The Problem of the Unity of a Physical Object in Berkeley.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 50-81. _____. “Optique géométrique, images rétiniennes et corpuscules chez Berkeley.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 7-18. _____. “Berkeley on the Numerical Identity of What Several Immediately Perceive: Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous III 247–8.” Philosophy Compass 7 (2012): 517-30. _____. “Immediate and Mediate Perception in Berkeley.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 355-84. Glenney, Brian. “Adam Smith and the Problem of the External World.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (2011): 205-23. Glezakos, Stavroula. “Comments on Melissa Frankel’s ‘Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning and Minds’.” Philosophia 37 (2009), 403-407. Glombíček, Petr; and Hill, James. George Berkeley: průvodce jeho filosofií. Praha: Filosofia, 2009. Glouberman, Mark. “Abstraction and Determinacy: the Ideological Background of Berkeleianism.” Idealistic Studies (1982): 14-34. _____. “Consciousness and Cognition: from Descartes to Berkeley.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1982): 244-65. _____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism: a Reply to Moked.” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1991): 315-18. _____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 2 (1994): 145-63. Goldschmidt, Tyron and Stapleford, Scott. Berkeley’s ‘Principles’: Expanded and Explained. New York: Routledge, 2016. Gordon-Roth, Jessica. “Tracing Reid’s ‘Brave Officer’ Objection Back to Berkeley—And Beyond.” Berkeley Studies 28 (2019): 3–23. Gorham, Geoffrey. “Early American Immaterialism: Samuel Johnson’s Emendations of Berk”Bloomsbury companioneley.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 54 (2018): 441-56. Gottenbarn, Donald. “Berkeley: God’s Pain.” Philosophical Studies 28 (1975): 245-54.

26 Gozzano, Simone. “Mental Images and Their Ontology.” Epistemologia 17 (1994): 225-52. Graham, Jody. “Common Sense and Berkeley’s Perception by Suggestion.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1997): 397-423. Grandi, Giovanni Battista. “Comments on Daniel E. Flage’s ‘Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.’” Philosophia 37 (2009), 373-78. _____. “Distance and Direction in Reid’s Theory of Vision.” Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy 35 (2016): 465-78. Granja, Dulce Maria. “Realismo et idealismo en Berkeley.” Contrafuerte (1985): 19-27. Gray, J. “Berkeley’s Theory of Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (1978): 415-34. Grayling, Anthony C. Berkeley: the Central Arguments. London: Duckworth, 1986. _____. “Berkeley’s Argument for Immaterialism.” In Winkler (2005), 166-89. Greco, John. “Reid’s Critique of Berkeley and Hume: What’s the Big Idea?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1995): 279-96. Greenberg, A. R. “Reid, Berkeley, and Notional Knowledge.” Monist 61 (1978): 415-34. Groza, Adam. “Idealism and the Nature of God.” In Cowan and Spiegel (2016), 107-26. Gruner, Rolf. “Berkeley on General Ideas.” Dialogue 8 (1969): 481-85. Grush, Rick. “Berkeley and the Spatiality of Vision.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007): 413-42. Grzeliński, Adam. “The Berkeleyan Conception of Nature.” Вісник Національного авіаційного університету. Філософія. Культурологія" Збірник наукових праць. Київ 2 #12 (2010): 13-20. _____. Człowiek i duch nieskończony. Immaterializm George’a Berkeleya [The Man and the Infinite Spirit: The Immaterialism of George Berkeley]. Toruń, Poland: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press, 2010. _____, ed. and trans. Próba stworzenia nowej teorii widzenia i inne eseje filozoficzne [Polish translation of A New Theory of Vision and other Philosophical Essays by George Berkeley]. Toruń, Poland: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press, 2011. _____. “Status przestrzeni w filozofii Berkeleya.” Spory o realism (2014): 189-214. _____. “Berkeley’s Understanding of Beauty and His Polemic with Shaftesbury.” In Charles 2015, 209-26. _____. “Alciphron; or the Minute Philosopher: Berkeley’s Redefinition of Free-Thinking.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 174-95. Guérineau, Roselyne. “Berkeley et les Bermudes.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 309-17. Gurczyński, Jacek. “Dwa Typy Racjonalności—Berkeley I Newton.” Rocznik Filozoficzny Ignatianum 19 (2013): 7-18. Gustafsson, Martin. “Berkeley at Vesuvius.” Wittgenstein Studien 4 (2013): 27-44. Gutiérrez, Pedro Stepanenko. “La conception berkeleyana del yo.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 13- 22. Gylling, Heta Aleksandra. “Berkeley as a Worldly Philosopher.” In Charles 2015, 23-36.

27 Hall, Richard A. S. “Did Berkeley Influence Edwards: Their Common Critique of the Moral Sense Theory,” in Jonathan Edwards’s Writings, ed. Stephen J. Stein. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996, 100-121. Hall, Roland. “ ‘New Words in Berkeley’s Writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 4-8. Hamou, Philippe. “Sens et fonction de modèle linguistique dans la Nouvelle Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz (2003), 47-78. _____. “Microscopes et minima visuels. Berkeley critique de l’autopsie instrumentale.” In Charles (2004), 103-26. _____. “L'optique des Voyages de Gulliver.” Revue d'histoire des sciences 60 (2007): 25-45. Hanczewski, Paweł. “George Berkeley: Forging the Irish Nation.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 135-49. Hanson, Norwood Russell. “The Dematerialization of Matter.” Philosophy of Science 29 (1962): 27-38. Hanratty, Gerald. “A Voice in the Wilderness: Berkeley’s Response to Enlightenment.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 32 (1990): 319-37. Hara, Kira. “Depth and Distance in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2004): 101-17. Hardwick, Charles. Berkeley and Peirce, Graduate Studies Texas Tech. University (1981), 81-85. Harman, Graham. “Realism without Materialism.” Substance: A Review of Theory & Literary Criticism 40 (2011): 52-72. Harris, James. “Berkeley on the Inward Evidence of Freedom.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 341-50. Harris, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Argument from Perceptual Relativity.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1997): 99-120. Hatfield, Gary. “The Cognitive Faculties.” In Garber (1998), 953-1002. Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David. “A New Approach to Berkeley’s Ideal Reality.” In Muehlmann (1995), 47-66. _____ and _____. “On Allaire’s ‘Another Visit’.” In Muehlmann (1995), 39-46. _____ and _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Dilemma: Beyond the Incoherence Model.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 221-38. Hausman, David B. Descartes’s Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early Modern Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997. Häyry, Matti. “Passive Obedience and Berkeley’s Moral Philosophy.” Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 3-14. Hayry, Matti and Hayry, Hetta. “Obedience to Rules and Berkeley’s Theological Utilitarianism.” Utilitas 6 (1994): 233-42. Hendrix, John; Williams, Roger; Carman, Charles H. Renaissance Theories of Vision. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2010. Henkel, Jeremy E. “How to Avoid Solipsism While Remaining an Idealist: Lessons From Berkeley and Dharmakīrti.” Comparative Philosophy 3 (2011): 58-73. Henze, D. F. “Descartes vs. Berkeley: a Study in Early Modern Metaphilosophy.” Metaphilosophy 8 (1977): 147-63. 28 Hernández-Castro, Gustavo. “La teoría del conocimiento de Berkeley: empirismo y colonialidad.” Revista Espiga 16 (2017): 93-106. Hestevold, H. S. “Berkeley’s Theory of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990): 179-92. Hibbs, Darren. “John Scottus Eriugena on the Composition of Material Bodies.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 385-93. Hight, Marc A. “Why We Do Not See What We Feel.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002): 148-62. _____. “Defending Berkeley’s Divine Ideas.” Philosophia 33 (2005): 97-128. _____. “Berkeley's Half-Way House.” Philosophy Compass 1(2006): 28-35. _____. “Berkeley and Bodily Resurrection.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007): 443- 58. _____. “Why My Chair is Not Merely A Congeries: Berkeley and the Single Idea Thesis.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 82-107. _____. Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. University Park: Penn State University Press, 2008. _____. “New Berkeley Correspondence: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 16-21. _____. “Berkeley’s Metaphysical Instrumentalism.” In Parigi (2010b), 15-29. _____. “How Immaterialism Can Save Your Soul.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 109-22. _____. “Berkeley on the Difference between Brutes and Men.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 207-22. _____. “Preserving the Torments of Hell: Berkeleian Immaterialism and the Afterlife.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 179-92. _____, ed. The Correspondence of George Berkeley. Cambridge: University Press, 2013. _____. Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2013. _____. “Berkeley on Economic Bubbles.” In Charles 2015, 191-208. _____. “Idealism, Miracles, and the Laws of Nature.” In Cowan and Spiegel 2016, 165-86. _____. “Berkeley’s Correspondence.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 49-62. Hight, Marc, and Bohannon, Joshua. “The Son More Visible: Immaterialism and the Incarnation.” Modern Theology 26 (2010): 120-48. Hight, Marc, and Ott, Walter. “The New Berkeley.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 1- 24. Hill, James. “The Synthesis of Empiricism and Innatism in Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions.” Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 3-15. _____. “The Active Self and Perception in Berkeley’s Three Dialogues. In Storrie (2018a), 123-35. Hill, Jonathan. “Gregory of Nyssa, Material Substance and Berkeleyan Idealism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009): 653–83. _____. “Berkeley’s Missing Argument: The Sceptical Attack on Intentionality.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 47-77.

29 Hochschild, Joshua P. “George Berkeley and a Theory of Analogy.” The Downside Review 122 (2004): 157-68. Hocutt, Max. “George Berkeley Resurrected: A Commentary on Baum’s ‘Ontology for Behavior Analysis’.” Behavior and Philosophy 46 (2018): 47-57. Hoffmann, Yoel. “ ‘Dream-World’ Philosophers: Berkeley and Vasubandhu.” Philosophy East- Philosophy West (1978): 247-68. Holden, Thomas. “Berkeley on Inconceivability and Impossibility.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (2019): 107-122. Hollingshead, G. “Bishop Berkeley and the Gloomy Clerk: Pope’s Final Satire on Deism.” Durham University Journal (1982): 19-27. _____. “Berkeley, Blackwell, and Blackwell’s Homer.” Scottish Literary Journal 11 (1984): 20-35. _____. “Pope, Berkeley, and the True Key to the Dunciad in Four Books.” English Studies in Canada 10 (1984): 141-55. _____. “The Case for Berkeley’s Authorship of The Vanity of Philosophical Systems.” Eighteenth- Century Life 9 (1985): 51-64. _____. “Sources for the Ladies’ Library.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 1-9. Holtzman, Matthew. “Berkeley on Common Sense, Theology, and Matter.” Ph.D. dissertation: Johns Hopkins University, 2010. _____. “Berkeley’s Two Panaceas.” Intellectual History Review 21 (2011): 473-95. _____. Review of Berkeley et la chimie: Une philosophie pour la chimie au XVIIIe siècle by Luc Peterschmitt. Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 40-45. Hone, Joseph M. Bishop Berkeley: His Life, Writings, and Philosophy. London: Faber & Faber, 1931. Houghton, Raymond. “International Berkeley Society.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 14-15. Howell, T. J. “The Bond of Society: Berkeley’s Theory of Social Reality.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 16. Huggler, Jørgen. “The Response to George Berkeley’s Philosophy in Twentieth-Century Danish Experimental Psychology: Edgar Rubin and Edgar Tranekjaer Rasmussen.” Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 51 (2018): 47-70. Hughes, M. “Hermes and Berkeley.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1992): 1-19. Hunter, Hugh. “Berkeley on Doing Good and Meaning Well.” In Charles 2015, 131-46. _____. “George Berkeley’s proof for the existence of God.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (2015): 183-93. _____. “Berkeley’s Suitcase.” Philosophy Now 117 (Dec 2016/Jan 2017): 6-9. _____. “Malebranche, Berkeley and the Path to Idealism.” Science et Esprit: Revue de philosophie et de théologie 70 (2018): 41-50. Hurley, Michael. “Berkeley and Methodism: a New Letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 1-2. Ibañez, Alejandro Herrera. “La nocion de existencia en la ontologia de Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 13-22. Ichinose, Masaki. “Berkeley on Practical Spirit.” Philosophical Studies 14 (1995): 1-17. Iglesias Huelga, Luis Alfonso. Berkeley: el empirista ingenioso. Barcelona: Batiscafo, 2015. 30 Ilodigwe, Damian. Berkeley: A Portrait. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2010. İmamoğlu, Tuncay. Bir Tanrı kanıtlaması olarak Berkeley idealizmi. İstanbul : İz Yayıncılık, 2014. Imlay, Robert A. “Berkeley and Scepticism: a Fatal Dalliance.” Hume Studies 18 (1992): 501-10. _____. “Berkeley and Action.” In Muehlmann (1995), 171-82. Istvan, Michael A. “The Link Between Berkeley’s Refutation of Abstraction and His Refutation of Materialism.” Methodus 6 (2011): 78-105. Isermann, Michael M. “George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and the Occult Tradition of Linguistic Platonism. Part II: George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and Linguistic Platonism.” Language & Communication 28 (2008): 57. Jacob, Alexander. “The Neoplatonic Conception of Nature in More, Cudworth and Berkeley.” In Gaukroger (1991), 101-121. Jacovides, Michael. “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 415-29. _____. “Remarks on Smalligan Marušić’s Comments.”Philosophia 37 (2009): 437-39. Jacquette, Dale. “Berkeley’s Continuity Argument for the Existence of God.” Journal of Religion 65 (1985): 1-14. _____. “Reconciling Berkeley’s Microscopes in God’s Infinite Mind.” Religious Studies 29 (1993): 453-63. _____. Review of A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley by John R. Roberts. Faith and Philosophy 28 (2011): 468-72. _____. Jacquette, Dale. “Newton’s Metaphysics of Space as God’s Emanative Effect.” Physics in Perspective 16 (2014): 344-70. Jaffro, Laurent. “Sensation et imagination. Berkeley et la ‘différence perçue’.” In Ressemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris 10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 6 (1999), 71-91. _____. “La paideia selon Berkeley et Shaftesbury. Un conflit dans la conception thérapeutique de la philosophie.” In La philosophie comme médecine de l’âme à l’âge classique, dir. G. Brykman, Université Paris 10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 9 (2003), 147-73. _____. “Le cogito de Berkeley.” Archives de philosophie 67 (2004): 85-111. _____. “Berkeley’s Criticism of Shaftesbury’s Moral Theory in Alciphron III.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 199-213. _____. “L’évidence de l’existence d’autrui est-elle un modèle pour la connaissance de Dieu? Berkeley, Hume, Reid, et l' ‘argument irrégulier.’” HAL – CCSD (2010). _____. “Ėducation moderne et tradition antique selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 277-86. _____. “Ist die Evidenz der Existenz des Anderen ein Modell für die Gotteserkenntnis? Berkeley, Hume, Reid und das ‘Argument des Irregulären’.” Aufklärung: Interdisziplinäres Jahrbuch zur Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts und seiner Wirkungsgeschichte 21 (2009): 51-74. Jaffro, Laurent; Brykman, Geneviève; Schwartz, Claire, eds. Berkeley’s Alciphron. English Text and Essays in Interpretation. Hildesheim: Olms, 2010. _____. “ ‘Reid said the business, but Berkeley did it.’ Ferrier interprète de l’immatérialisme.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 135-49.

31 Jakapi, Roomet. Berkeley, Mysteries, and Meaning: a Critique of the Non-Cognitivist Interpretation. Ph. D. diss., University of Tartu. Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2002. _____. “Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2002): 401-11. _____. “Faith, Truth, Revelation and Meaning in Berkeley’s Defence of the Christian Religion (in Alciphron).” The Modern Schoolman 80 (2002): 23-34. _____. “Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and ‘Non-Cognitive’ Propositions in Scripture.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2003): 86-90. _____. “Was Berkeley a Utilitarian?” In Lemetti and Piirimäe (2007), 53-68. _____. “Berkeley and the Separate State of the Soul: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 18 (2007): 24-28. _____. “Christian Mysteries and Berkeley’s Alleged Non-Cognitivism.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007): 188-98. _____. “Berkeley’s Defence of the Scripture in Alciphron VI.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 353-56. _____. “George Berkeley.” In Early Modern Philosophy of Religion [2009], ed. Graham Oppy and N. N. Trakakis. New York: Routledge, 2014. Pp. 183-96. Jankowiak, Tim. “Kantian Phenomenalism without Berkeleyan Idealism.” Kantian Review 22 (2017): 205-231. Jennings, Gavan. Berkeley’s Theory of Radical Dependence. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018. Jennings, Roger. “The Fourth Dialogue Between Hylas and Philonous.” Philosophy Now 105 (Nov/Dec 2014): 32-35. Jesseph, Douglas M., ed., George Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst. A Modern Edition with Introductions and Commentary. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academy, 1992. _____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. _____. “Berkeley, God, and Explanation.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005), 183-206. _____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Winkler (2005), 266-310. _____. “Faith and Fluxions: Berkeley on Theology and Mathematics.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 247-60. Jessop, T. E. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.” Journal of Theological Studies 9 (1958): 197-98. Jolley, Nicholas. “Berkeley and Malebranche on Causality and Volition.” In Cover (1990), 227-44. ______. “Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1996): 535-48. _____. Causality and Mind: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Jones, Nick. Starting with Berkeley. London: Continuum, 2009. Jones, Tom. Pope and Berkeley: the Language of Poetry and Philosophy. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. ______. “George Berkeley and Thomas Secker: A Note.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006): 14-19.

32 _____. Review of ‘We Irish’ in Europe: Yeats, Berkeley & Joseph Hone by W. J. McCormack. Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 51-53. _____. Review of The Correspondence of George Berkeley, ed. Marc Hight. Berkeley Studies 24 (2013): 112-15. _____. “George Berkeley’s Biography.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 5-20. Jonik, Michael. “Mind and Matter in Early America: The Berkeley-Johnson Correspondence.” Pluralist 11 (2016): 39-48. Kabitoglou, E, Douka. “On the Discrimination of Platonisms in Eighteenth Century England.” Philosophical Inquiry 15 (1993): 20-45. Kail, P. J. E. “Berkeley, the Ends of Language, and the Principles of Human Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (2009): 265-78. _____. “Causation, Fictionalism and Non-Cognitivism: Berkeley and Hume.” In Parigi (2010b), 31- 40. _____. “Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Epistemology.” In Epistemology: The Key Thinkers, ed. Stephen Hetherington. London: Continuum, 2012. Pp. 111-30. _____. Berkeley’s ‘Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge’: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Kamio, Mitsuo. “The Semantics of Perception: A Romantic Phrase of the Consciousness.” Journal of the School of Letters 4 (2008): 13-35. Karásek, Jindrich. “Mind and the Other [in Czech].” Filosoficky Casopis 57 (2009), 61-69. _____. “Problémy s Idealismem” [in Czech]. Reflexe 49 (2015): 3-24. Kasam, A. “Can Berkeley Be Called an Imagist?” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1989): 75-88. Kassavine, Illia. “Berkeley Revisited: on the New Metaphysics for Social Epistemology. 90 Years after Materialism and Empiriocriticism.” Epistemologia 19 (1996): 157-74. Katz, Mikhail G; and Sherry, David. “Leibniz’s Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, and Their Foes from Berkeley to Russell and Beyond.” Erkenntnis 78 (2013): 571-625. Kearney, John. “Thought, Language and Meaning in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” The New Scholasticism 49 (1975): 480-94. Kearney, Richard. “Berkeley and the Irish Mind.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25. Keefe, Jenny. “The Return to Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2007), 101-13. Kelly, Patrick. “Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14. _____. “Berkeley and Money: Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 101-16. _____. “Berkeley and Ireland.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25. _____. “Berkeley’s Servants.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 13-14. _____. “Berkeley’s Economic Writings.” In Winkler (2005), 339-68. _____. “Berkeley’s Querist: ‘Hints . . . What Is to be Done in this Critical State of Our Affairs’ or Proposals for a Hyperborean Eutopia?” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 196-215.

33 Kendrick, Nancy. Review of New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought, ed. Stephen H. Daniel. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2009): 471-72. _____. “The ‘Empty Amusement’ of Willing: Berkeley on Agent Causation.” Berkeley Studies 25 (2014): 3-15. _____. “Berkeley’s Bermuda Project and The Ladies Library.” In Charles 2015, 243-58. _____. “Berkeley’s Bermuda Project in Context.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 21-48. Kennedy, Máire. “Reading the Enlightenment.in Eighteenth-Century Ireland.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 45 (2012): 355-78. Keynes, Geoffrey. “Samuel Johnson and Bishop Berkeley.” The Book Collector (1981): 177-81. Kijaczko, Stanislaw. Immaterializm: epistemologia I metafizyka: próba interpretacij filozofii George’a Berkeleya. Opole: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2002. Kingston, F. Temple. The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Irish Philosopher. Lewiston: Mellen, 1992. Klaas van Berkel, Klaas and Vanderjagt, Arjo, eds., The Book of Nature in Modern Times. Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2005. Klein, Lawrence E. “Berkeley, Shaftesbury and the Meaning of Politeness.” Studies in Eighteenth- Century Culture 16 (1986): 57-68. Klemme, Heiner F. “Causality.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, vol. 1, 368-88. _____. “Substances and Modes, Space and Time.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth- Century Philosophy, ed, Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, vol. 1, 343-67. Kline, David A. “Berkeley’s Theory of Common Sense.” International Studies in Philosophy 19 (1987): 21-31. _____. “Berkeley’s Divine Language Argument.” In Berman (1993), 185-99. Koetsier, Teun and Bergmans, Luc, eds., Mathematics and the Divine. A Historical Study. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005. Kohlenberg, Philip. “Bishop Berkeley on Religion and the Church.” Harvard Theological Review 66 (1973): 219-36. Kohler Ryan, Renee. “De profundis clamavi ad te Domine: The Existential Significance of Depth for Berkeley, Merleau-Ponty and Desmond.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 237-53. Kopper, Joachim. Das Unbezügliche als Offenbarsein: Besinnung auf das philosophische Denken. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004. Kovár, Martin. “Was Berkeley Really an Immaterialist?” Studia Philosophica 61 (2014): 77-90. Krisztian, Pete. “George Berkeley: Immaterializmussal a Jozan Eszert.” Korunk 8 (2019): 34-40. Kroustallis, Basileios. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2004): 151-66. Ksenjek, Ekaterina Y. and Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley, the Author of Nature, and the Judeo- Christian God.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (2012): 281-300. Kucharski, Dariusz. “‘Common Sense’ as an Argument for the Berkeleyan Immaterialistic Thesis” [in Polish]. Studia Philosophiae Christianae 48 (2012): 49-63. 34 Kulenkampff, Arend. George Berkeley. München: Beck, 1987. _____. Esse est percipi. Untersuchungen zur Philosophie George Berkeleys. Basel: Schwabe, 2001. Kupfer, Joseph. “Universalization in Berkeley’s Rule-Utilitarianism.” Revue internationale de philosophie 28 (1974): 511-31. Kuznetsova, Irina. “Utpaladeva’s Conception of Self in the Context of the Ᾱtmavāda-Anātmavada Debate and in Comparison with Western Theological Idealism. Philosophy East & West 62 (2012): 339-58. Lambert, Richard. “Berkeley’s Use of the Relativity Argument.” Idealistic Studies (1980): 107-21. _____. “The Literal Intent of Berkeley’s Dialogues.” Philosophy and Literature 6 (1982): 165-70. Lamers, Robert. “Berkeley and Schopenhauer.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (1981): 120-43. Leary, David E. “Berkeley’s Social Theory: Context and Development.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 635-49. Lebrun, G. “Berkeley ou le sceptique malgré lui.” Manuscrito 11 (1988): 33-48. Leduc-Fayette, Denise. “Qu’est-ce que ‘parler aux yuex’? Berkeley et le ‘langage optique’.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 4 (1997): 409-27. Lee, R. N. “What Berkeley’s Notions Are.” Idealistic Studies 20 (1990): 19-41. Lee, Sukjae. “Berkeley on the Activity of Spirits.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2012): 539-76. _____. “Berkeley on Continuous Creation: Occasionalism Contained.” In Storrie (2018a), 106-122. Lees, Daniel E. “Berkeley Redux: Imagination as Ethical Power in Shelley’s ‘Mont Blanc’.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 58 (2016): 278-304. Le Jallé, Ėléonore. “Mandeville dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 297-308. Lema Hincapié, Andrés. “Berkeley y su inmaterialismo ontológico: Elementos básicos.” Dialogos: Revista del Departmento de Filosofia Universidad de Puerto Rico 44 (2012): 141-65. Lemetti, Juhana and Piirimäe, Eva, eds. Human Nature as the Basis of Morality and Society in Early Modern Philosophy. Acta Philosophica Fennica 83. Helsinki: Philosophical Society of Finland, 2007. Lennon, Thomas M. “Berkeley and the Ineffable.” Syntheses 75 (1988): 231-50. _____. “George Berkeley and the Act-Object Distinction.” Dialogue 40 (2001): 651-67. _____. “The Significance of the Barrovian Case”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 38 (2007): 36-55. _____. “The Genesis of Berkeley's Theory of Vision Vindicated” History of European Ideas 33 (2007), 321-29. ____. “The Historical Consistency of Berkeley’s Idealism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 101-24. _____. “The Main Part and Pillar of Berkeley’s Theory: Idealism and Perceptual Heterogeneity.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 91-115. Lavine, Michael. “How to Make a Mistake.” Philosophia 22 (1993): 29-37. Levin, David Michael, ed. Sites of Vision. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 1997.

35 Levin, Janet. “Molyneux Meets Euthyphro: Does Cross-Modal Transfer Require Rational Transition?” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2008): 289-97. Levin, Yakir. “Idealism and Relativism: Locke, Berkeley, Kant, and Wittgenstein” [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2010): 128-42. Levine, James. “Prior, Berkeley, and the Barcan Formula.” Synthese 193 (2016): 3551-65. Levine, Michael. “Berkeley’s Theocentric Mentalism: Pantheism?” Sophia (1987): 30-41. _____ and Levi, Neil. “Robinson on Berkeley: ‘Bad Faith’ or Naive Idealism?” Idealistic Studies 22 (1992): 163-78. Levy, David M. “Bishop Berkeley Exorcises the Infinite: Fuzzy Consequences of Strict Finitism.” Hume Studies 18 (1992): 511-36. _____. “ ‘Magic Buffalo’ and Berkeley’s ‘Theory of Vision’: Learning in Society.” Hume Studies 19 (1993): 223-26. Leyvraz, Jean-Pierre. “La notion de Dieu chex Berkeley.” Revue de theologie et de philosophie (1980): 241-52. Lievers, Menno. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (1992): 399- 416. Linford, Daniel J. “Early–Modern Irreligion and Theological Analogy: A Response to Gavin Hyman’s A Short History of Atheism.” Secularism and Nonreligion 5, no. 3 (2016): 1-8. Livesey, James. Reviews of The Correspondence of George Berkeley, ed. Marc Hight; and Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context by Scott Breuninger. Modern Intellectual History 12 (2015): 453-73. Llamas-Gómez, Clara Isabel. “Introduction to ‘Berkeley’s Crossroads’.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 1-4. Lloyd, Peter B. Consciousness and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London: Ursa, 1999. _____. Paranormal Phenomena and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London: Ursa, 1999. Loaiza, Juan R. “Molyneux’s Question in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 32 (2017): 231-47. Long, A. A. “What is the Matter with Matter, According to Plotinus?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 78 (2016): 37-54. López, Alberto Luis. Acerca de la divinidad. Investigación sobre la función de Dios en la filosofía de George Berkeley. Ph.D. Diss., UNAM, Mexico, 2013. _____. “Berkeley: el origen de la crítica a los infinitesimales.” Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía 41 (2014): 195-217. _____. Review of The Correspondence of George Berkeley ed. by Marc Hight. Diánoia 59 (2014): 185-88. _____. “Berkeley: la concepción de Dios en los Comentarios Filosóficos.” Endoxa 36 (2015): 123- 44. _____. “Berkeley: el papel de Dios en la teoría de la visión.” Tópicos revista de Filosofía 49 (2015): 27-52. _____. “Lenguaje, materia y dios: Un estudio sobre los ‘Dialogues’ de George Berkeley.” Estudios Filosoficos 64 (2015): 213-33.

36 _____. Review of Berkeley revisited: moral, social and political philosophy, ed. Sébastien Charles. International Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2016), 512-14. _____. Review of Berkeley by Daniel E. Flage. Signos Filosóficos 18 (2016): 198-202. _____. “La influencia de Locke en el deísmo y su repercusión en Berkeley.” In Las bases de la modernidad: John Locke, edited by Luis Antonio Velasco Guzmán. Ciudad de México, MX: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2016. Pp. 21-44. _____. “Berkeley: Sobre el conocimiento nocional de la mente.” Contrastes: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 22 (2017): 137-54. _____. “Respuesta al comentario de David Camilo Téllez Guzmán: ‘Berkeley: el papel de Dios en la teoría de la visión’.” Ideas Y Valores 66 (2017): 409-412. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía 57 (2019): 465-72. Lord, S. K. “Berkeleian Linguistics.” Linguistics 213 (1978): 5-28. Louet, D. “La critique de l’absolutisme newtonien chez Leibniz et Berkeley.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 93 (1988): 447-68. Lowe, E. J. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. Lucash, Frank S. “The Nature of Mind.” Giornale di Metafisica 13 (1991): 89-107. Luce, A. A. “Berkeley and the Living Thing.” Hermathena 123 (1977): 19-25. Luce, J. V. “Yale College and the Acquisition of Whitehall.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 19- 22. Luebering, J. E. “Authors of the Enlightenment: 1660 to 1800.” In The Britannica Guide to Authors. New York: Britannica Educational, 2014. Lutterfelds, Wilhelm. “Kant oder Berkeley? Zum aktuellen Streit um den korrecten Realismus.” Perspektiven der Philosophie 22 (1996): 305-40. Lyons, William. “Dysart Castle: George Berkeley’s Childhood Home.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 11-15. Mack, Ruth. “The limits of the senses in Johnson’s Scotland.” Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 54 (2013): 279-94. Mahon, James Edwin. Review of The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy by Peter Walmsley. Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 15-17. Maia Neto, José R. “Academic Skepticism in Early Modern Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1997): 199-220. Malherbe, Michel. “Husserl critique de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 355-66. Malherbe, Michel. “La critique husserlienne des idées abstraites selon Berkeley.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 623-32. Mall, Ram Adhar. Der operative Begriff des Geistes: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1984. Mancino, Michele. “Il Mezzogiorno nei diari (1717) del ‘Viaggio in Italia’ di George Berkeley.” In Atti delle giornate di studio: Il turismo culturale in Campania. Napoli, Quaderni dell’Università degli studi “Federico II”, 2004, 271-304.

37 Mandal, Nathaniel. Idee und Intention. Die Ideen- beziehungsweise Bedeutungstheorie John Lockes und ihre Wiederbelebung in der Theorie der Sprecherbedeutung bei Paul Grice. Munich: Grin Verlag, 2010. _____. Qualitäten der Wahrnehmung. Lockes Unterscheidung zwischen Qualitäten primärer und sekundärer Art und Berkeleys Immaterialismuseinwand. Munich: Grin Verlag, 2010. Marciano, Bruno. George Berkeley. Estetica e idealismo. Genova: Nova Scripta, 2010. _____. “Il rapporto estetico con la natura nella filosofia di Berkeley” Rivista di Estetica 54 (2014): 247-70. Markwart, Anna Markwart, and Szymańska, Marta. “O zmysłach i postrzeganiu–czyli czego nie wiemy o Berkeleyu, a dowiadujemy się od Smitha i vice versa.” Filo-Sofija 12 (2012): 147- 154. _____. “Dobro jednostki dobrem społeczeństwa czy dobro społeczeństwa dobrem jednostki? George Berkeley i Adam Smith o postrzeganiu i moralności” (Polish). [“The Good of the Individual as the Good of Society, or the Good of Society as the Good of the Individual? George Berkeley and Adam Smith on Perception and Morality.”] Etyka 46 (2013), 21-34. Martin, Jorge L. Introducción, traducción y notas adicionales to Siris: Empirismo e idealismo platónico en el siglo XVII [includes Spanish translation of Berkeley’s Siris]. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila, 2009. Martinello, Francesco. “Direzioni del moto e direzioni nello spazio: Berkeley e Kant.” Rivista di Filosofia 102 (2011): 105-23. Marušić, Jennifer Smalligan. “Berkeley on the Objects of Perception.” In Storrie (2018a), 40-60. Mathauser, Zdenek. “The Theory of Reflection in Aesthetics and the Heritage of George Berkeley.” (in Czechoslovakian), Estetika 11 (1974): 30-52. Mattey, G. J. “Kant’s Conception of Berkeley’s Idealism.” Kantstudien 74 (1983): 161-75. McCracken, Charles J. “What Does Berkeley’s God See in the Quad?” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61 (1979): 280-92. _____. Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983. _____. “Berkeley’s Conception of Idea [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14-16. _____. “Berkeley’s Notion of Spirit.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 597-602. _____. “Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 19-40. _____. “Berkeley’s Cartesian Concept of Mind: the Return Through Malebranche and Locke to Descartes.” Monist 71 (1988): 596-611. _____. “Berkeley on the Relation of Ideas to the Mind.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 187-200. _____. “Godless Immaterialism: on Atherton’s Berkeley.” In Muehlmann (1995), 249-60. _____. “Demons that Deceive, Gods that Perceive, and the Limits of Skepticism.” In Brykman (1997), 73-89. _____. “Knowledge of the Existence of Bodies.” In Garber (1998), 624-48. _____. “George Berkeley.” In Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Steven Nadler. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, 437-55. _____. “Berkeley’s Realism.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 23-44.

38 _____ and Tipton, Ian, eds., Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. _____. “Leibniz and Berkeley on Body.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 175-92. _____. “Berkeley and Descartes.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 247-53. _____. “Berkeley and Malebranche.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 288-98. McDonough, Jeffrey K. “Berkeley, Human Agency and Divine Concurrentism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 567-90. _____. “Berkeley on Ordinary Objects.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 385-96. McGlynn, Conor. “An Intuitionistic Defence of Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Analysis 79 (2019): 236-42. McGowan, William. “The Dream of Ezra Stiles: Bishop Berkeley’s Haunting of New England.” Studies in Eighteenth- Century Culture (1982): 181-98. McGowan, William. “Did Berkeley Write The Irish Blasters?” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 1- 4. _____. “George Berkeley’s American Declaration of Independence.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 12 (1983): 105-13. _____. “Berkeley Kicking His Own Stones.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1989): 81-102. McIntyre, J. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.” Scottish Journal of Theology 15 (1962): 420-23. McKim, Robert. “Wenz on Abstract Ideas and Christian Neoplatonism in Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Ideas (1982): 665-71. _____. “The Entries in Berkeley’s Notebooks: a Reply to Bertil Belfrage.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 156-61. _____. “Luce’s Account of the Development of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 649-69. _____. Review of Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. Modern Philosophy by Theodore Young. Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 13-16. _____. “What Is Berkeley’s God Doing in the Quad?” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987/88): 637-53. _____. Review of Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley, ed. Ernest Sosa. Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 28-32. _____. “Berkeley on Private Ideas and Public Objects.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 215-33. _____. “Abstraction and Immaterialism: Recent Interpretations.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 1-13. _____. “Berkeley’s Notebooks.” In Winkler (2005), 63-93. McKinnon, Rhys. “Dismantling the Straw Man: An Analysis of the Arguments of Hume and Berkeley Against Locke’s Doctrine of Abstract Ideas.” Sorites: An International Electronic Magazine of Analytical Philosophy. 16 (2005), 38-45. McRae, Robert. “’Idea’ as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century.” Journal of the History of Ideas 26 (1965): 175-90. Meattini, Valerio. “Berkeley e l’Italia.” Critica storica 19 (1982): 3-21.

39 Mel’vil’, I. K. And Sushko, S. A. “Argument Doktora Dzhonsona: Semiuel Dzhonson kak kritik Berkli.” Voprosy Filosofii 3 (1981): 133-44. Menichelli, Caterina. “Was Berkeley A Spinozist? A Historiographical Answer (1718-1751).” In Parigi (2010b), 171-88. Mensch, Jennifer. “Kant and the Problem of Idealism: On the Significance of the Göttingen Review.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2006): 297-317. Mercer, Christia and O’Neill, Eileen, eds. Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. Michael, M. A. “Berkeley’s puzzle: what does experience teach us?” Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries 52 (2015): 2026. Migely, Geneviève. “Berkeley’s Actively Passive Mind.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 153-71. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism by Samuel C. Rickless. Philosophy in Review 34 (2014): 333-35. Millar, Alan. “Berkeley’s Puzzle.” Analysis 77 (2017): 232-42. Mirarchi, L. A. “Force and Absolute Motion in Berkeley’s Philosophy of Physics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 705-13. _____. “A Rejoinder to Bruce Silver’s Reply.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 716-18. Moked, Gabriel. Particles and Ideas: Berkeley’s Corpuscularian Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988. Moked, Gabriel. “A Note on Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism.” Iyyun 40 (1991): 95-99. _____. “Two Central Issues in Bishop Berkeley’s ‘Corpuscularian Philosophy’ in the Siris.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643-49. Montero, B. H. “La realidad en Kant y Berkeley.” Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa Rica 23 (1985): 49-69. Monti, Maria Teresa. “Theories ‘providentialistes’ de la vision. Chirurgiens et philosophes entre Berkeley et Molyneux.” in Wissenschaften und Musik unter dem Einfluß einer sich ändernden Geisteshaltung, edited by M. Büttner. Bochum: Universitätsverlag N. Brockmeyer, 1992, 69-76. _____. “’Scrittura’ e ‘commento’: il codice berkeleiano della percezione. Problemi medici e teorie filosofiche.” In L’interpretazione nei secoli XVI e XVII , edited by Guido Canziani and Yves-Charles Zarka. Milano: F. Angeli, 1993, 387-406. _____, ed., Teorie della visione e problemi di percezione visiva nell’età moderna. Milano: Franco Angeli, 1995. _____. “Isomorphisme, signes naturals et “prophéties”: les suggestions de Descartes et les solutions de Berkeley.” In Brykman (1997), 117-48. Montluzin, Emily Lorraine de. “Attributions of Authorship in the Gentleman’s Magazine, 1731-36: A Supplement to the Union List.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews 21 (2008): 11-24. Mooney, Timothy. “Irish Cartesian and Proto-Phenomenologist: The Case of Berkeley.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 213-36. Moore, Sean D. “Introduction: Ireland and the Enlightenment.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 45 (2012): 345-54. 40 Moreau, J. “Berkeley et le schématisme.” Kantstudien 79 (1988): 286-92. Morgan, Vance. “Kant and Dogmatic Idealism: A Defence of Kant’s Refutation of Berkeley.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (1993): 217-37. Moriarty, Clare Marie. “The Ad Hominem Argument of Berkeley’s Analyst.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (2018): 429-51. _____. “Berkeley vs. Walton.” History Ireland 27 (2019): 22-24. Morris, David. “Optical Idealism and the Languages of Depth in Descartes and Berkeley.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (1997): 363-92. Mourant, John A. “Berkeley and Religious Language.” In Explanation. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1973, 73-88. Muehlmann, Robert G. “Berkeley’s Ontology and the Epistemology of Idealism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1978): 89-111. _____. “The Role of Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 397-425. _____. Berkeley’s Ontology. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992. _____, ed., Berkeley’s Metaphysics. Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Press, 1995. _____. “Berkeley’s Problem of Sighted Agency.” In Muehlmann (1995), 149-70. _____. “The Substance of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Muehlmann (1995), 89-106. _____. “Strong and Weak Heterogeneity in Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 121-44. Mugnai, Paolo F. Segno e linguaggio in George Berkeley. Roma: ed. dell’Ateneo, 1979. Mun Seong-Hwa. Berkeley und Hegel: eine Untersuchung zur logischen Dingkonstitution und zur dialektischen Bewußtseinsdeskription. Ph. D. diss., University of Düsseldorf, 1997. Munoa Roiz, J. L. “George Berkeley (1685-1753) (II).” Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología 82 (2007): 121-22. Mureşan, V. “Berkeley’s argument for the existence of God in the Alciphron dialogue.” Transylvanian Review 21 (2012): 125-30. Murray, Patrick. “Berkeley and Money: Money, Wealth, and Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs: a Reply to Patrick Kelly.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 152-56. Myers, Joanne E. “How Body Matters in Berkeley’s Siris.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 43 (2014): 111-35. Myllymaa, Lauri. “Mielen ideasta todellisuuden kuvaan: Henri Bergsonin tulkinta ja kritiikki George Berkeleyn havaintokäsityksestä.” In Havainto: Suomen Filosofisen Yhdistyksen yhden sanan kollokvion esitelmiä, edited by H. Laiho and M. Tuominen. Turku: University of Turku, 2018. Pp. 102-109. Nadler, Steven. “Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1990): 47-61. _____, ed. Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993. _____. A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008.

41 Nanavati, Shaun. “A history and experimental analysis of the moon illusion.” The New School Psychology Bulletin 6. Nelson, Alan, and Landy, David. “Qualities and Simple Ideas: Hume and His Debt to Berkeley.” In Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historican and Ongoing Debate, ed. Lawrence Nolan. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011, 216-38. Neri, Luigi. “’Filling the World with a Mite’: un paradosso dell’infinita divisibilità negli scritti giovanili di George Berkeley.” Rivista di filosofia 71 (1980): 67-97. _____. “Esperienza, metafisica e geometria nel pensiero di Berkeley.” Rivista di filosofia 76 (1985): 239-67. _____. “Il caso Siris, ovvero la ‘seconda filosofia’ di George Berkeley vescovo di Cloyne.” Giornale critico della filosofia italiana (1990): 320-41. _____. George Berkeley. Filosofia e critica dei linguaggi scientifici. Bologna: CLUEB, 1991. _____. “Fenomenismo e realismo in George Berkeley.” Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 3 (2005): 470-94. Newburgh, R. “Did Berkeley foreshadow Mach?” American Journal of Physics 76 (2008): 189-190. Nezinska, E. “To Make Truth Glide Into the Soul [in Czechoslovakian].” Filozofia 47 (1992): 310- 12. Nielsen, Harry. “A Categorical Difficulty in Berkeley.” Philosophy Research Archives (1980). Nols, Carmen. Zeichenhafte Wirklichkeit: Realität als Ausdruck der kommunikativen Präsenz Gottes in der Theologie George Berkeleys. Mohr Siebeck, 2012. Nomura, Tomokiyo. “Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 45 (2012): 455-57. Norton-Smith, T. M. “Sending an Irishman ‘Realing’: Constructive Realism and George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Arithmetic.” Midwest Quarterly 42 (2001): 199-211. Nuchelmans, G. “Berkeleys betekenisleer.” Wijsgerig perspectief 26 (1985-86). Nurock, Vanessa. “La conscience morale selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 319-30. Oaklander, L. N. “The Inherence Interpretation of Berkeley: a Critique.” Modern Schoolman 54 (1977): 261-69. Oakes, Jason Benjamin. In Him We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Philosophical Theology in Nicolas Malebranche and George Berkeley. Ph. D. dissertation: University of Oklahoma, 2009. Oakes, Robert A. “God and Physical Objects.” International Journal of the Philosophy of Religion 9 (1978): 16-29. O’Callaghan, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward a More Perfect Form of Existence. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003. Oda, Takaharu. “Berkeley on Voluntary Motion: A Conservationist Account.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 71–98. O’Donnell, C. Oliver. “Depicting Berkeleyan idealism: a study of two portraits by John Smibert.” Word & Image 33 (Jan-Mar 2017): 18-34. Oekerijee, S. K. “Descartes, Berkeley, and the External World.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 23 (1996): 77-93.

42 Oertel, Hans Joachim. George Berkeley und die englische Literatur. Unveränd. Reprogr. Nachdr. D. 1 Aufl., Halle a. d. Saale: Niemeyer 1934 (Walluf bei Wiesbaden: Sändig, 1973). O’Gorman, Frank and Donald, Diana, eds., Ordering the World in the Eighteenth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. O’Grady, Paul. Review of Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst: a Modern Edition with Introductions and Commentary, ed.Douglas M. Jesseph.” Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 4-8. O’Higgins, J. “Browne and King, Collins and Berkeley: Agnosticism or Anthropomorphism?” Journal of Theological Studies 27 (1976): 88-112. Olanshile, Muideen, Adeyanju and Awolowo, Obafemi. “A Critical Assessment of Locke and Berkeley on the Problem of Perception.” Cogito: Multidisciplinary Research Journal 10 (2018): 50-58. Olscamp, Paul. Some Suggestions about the Moral Philosophy of George Berkeley. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008. Olszewski, Mikołaj. George Berkeley: Alkifron. Kety̨ : Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki, 2008. Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang, ed. La voie des idées? Le statut de la représentation XVIIè-XXè siècles. Paris: CNRS éditions, 2006. Orlando, Eleonora. “Sobre el idealismo de Berkeley.” Revista de Filosofia 7 (1992): 53-68. Ott, Walter. “The Cartesian Context of Berkeley’s Attack on Abstraction.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2004): 407-24. _____. “Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: the Fourth Distinction.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2006): 437-50. _____. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism by Samuel C. Rickless. Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (2015): 162-63. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Principles Expanded and Explained by Tyron Goldschmidt. Philosophical Review 127 (2018): 115-17. Oya, Alberto. “Análisis Del Argumento de Berkeley Para Probar la Existencia de Dios.” Endoxa 35 (2015): 109-118. _____. “George Berkeley: els arguments positius a favor del immaterialisme i el principi de semblança.” Comprendre 19 (2017): 83-92. _____. “La crítica de George Berkeley al representacionalismo de John Locke.” Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 35 (2018): 109-126. Pabst, Manfred. Berkeley, Joyce, Beckett: Reflexionen und Interpretationen. Wiesbaden: Volkshochschule Wiesbaden e. V., 1997. Pappas, George. “Ideas, Minds and Berkeley.” American Philosophical Quarterly (1980): 181-94. _____. “Adversary Metaphysics.” Philosophy Research Archives 9 (1983): 571-86. _____. “Abstract Ideas and the Esse is Percipi Thesis.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 47-62. _____. “Abstract Ideas and Unperceived Existent Sensible Objects [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 16.

43 _____. “Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1987): 105-14. _____. “Berkeley and Common Sense Realism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1991): 27-42. _____. “Berkeleian Idealism and Impossible Performances.” In Muehlmann (1995), 127-48. _____. “The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753.” International Studies in Philosophy 29 (1997): 126-27. _____. “Berkeley and Scepticism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1999): 133-49. _____. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2000. _____. “Les idées abstraites et la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” In Charles (2004), 37-58. _____. “Berkeley’s Assessment of Locke’s Epistemology.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 29-49. _____. “Certainty and Knowledge of Objects in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 275- 86. _____. “Berkeley’s Positive Epistemology.” Philosophical Inquiry 35 (2011): 23-35. Parigi, Silvia. “George Berkeley e l’illusione lunare.” Rivista di storia della scienza 4 (1987): 51- 60. _____. “La quaestio di Barrow: un’aporia della visione tramite lenti.” Nuncius 3 (1988): 65-69. ______. “Il problema di Molyneux: avventure filosofiche di ciechi, neonati e di alcuni animali.” BioLogica 4 (1990): 171-207. _____. “’The Horse Is in the Stable, the Books are in the Study as Before’: appunti per una storia della storiografia berkeleiana.” Bollettino filosofico dell’Università della Calabria 9 (1991): 113-34. _____. “I filosofi e il microscopio: da Descartes a Berkeley.” Rivista di storia della scienza 1 (1993): 155-72. _____. Il mondo visibile. George Berkeley e la ‘perspectiva’. Firenze: Olschki, 1995. _____, ed., George Berkeley, Opere filosofiche Torino: UTET, 1996. _____. “Is There a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism?” In Brykman (1997), 23-48. _____. “Caverne, terremoti, fossili e vulcani negli Scritti di storia naturale di George Berkeley.” In Segni e percorsi della modernità, edited by Ferdinando Abbri and Marco Segala. Arezzo: Università degli studi di Siena, 2000, 77-105. _____. “Teoria e storia del problema di Molyneux.” Laboratorio dell’ISPF 1 (2004): www.ispf.cnr.it/ispf-lab. _____. Review of The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley, ed. Kenneth P. Winkler. Philosophy in Review 27 (2007): 407-409. _____. Spiriti, effluvi, attrazioni. La fisica curiosa dal Rinascimento al Secolo dei Lumi. Napoli: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2010a. _____, ed. George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010. _____. “Scire per causas Versus scire per signa: George Berkeley and Scientific Explanation in Siris.” In Parigi (2010b), 107-19. _____. “Lo spirito etereo e l’acqua di catrame.” In Parigi (2010a), 248-51. 44 _____. “Siris and the Renaissance: Some Overlooked Berkeleian Sources.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 151-62. _____. Review of The Correspondence of George Berkeley, ed. Marc A Hight. European Legacy 21 (2016): 615-17. _____. “Berkeley’s Christian Enlightenment.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 99–114. Park, Désirée. Complementary Notions: a Critical Study of Berkeley’s Theory of Concepts. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1972. _____. “Notions: the Counter-Poise of the Berkeleyan Ideas.” Giornale di Metafisica 12 (1981): 243-65. _____. “Prior and Williams on Berkeley.” Philosophy (1981): 231-41. _____. “Supplement to the Editor’s Introduction to the Philosophical Commentaries.” In The Works of George Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne, ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. Nendeln, Lichtenstein: Kraus Reprint, 1982. _____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Anselm’s Argument.” Anselm Studies 1 (1983): 103-9. _____. “Facts and Reasons Concerning Berkeley’s Reprinted Works.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 14-16. _____. “The Berkeleyan Scheme of Things and Some Consequences.” Giornale di Metafisica 19 (1988): 17-41. Patey, Douglas. “Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Kicking the Stone Again.” Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 139-47. Pearce, Kenneth L. “The Semantics of Sense Perception in Berkeley.” Religious Studies 44 (2008): 249-68. _____. “Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World.” Ph. D. diss., University of Southern California, 2014. _____. “Berkeley’s Lockean Religious Epistemology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 75 (2014): 417-38. _____. Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. _____. “Berkeley on Unperceived Objects and the Publicity of Language.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 34 (2017): 231-50. _____. “How Berkeley’s Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (2017): 553-76. _____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Religion.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 458-83. _____. Review of Idealism and Christian Theology, edited by Joshua R. Farris and S. Mark Hamilton. Faith and Philosophy 34 (2017): 365-69. _____. “Matter, God, and Nonsense: Berkeley’s Polemic Against the Freethinkers in the Three Dialogues.” In Storrie (2018a), 176-90. _____. “What Descartes Doubted, Berkeley Denied, and Kant Endorsed.” Dialogue 58 (2019): 31- 63. Pépin, François. Compte rendu de Berkeley et la chimie. Une philosophie pour la chimie au XVIIIe siècle par Luc Peterschmitt. Methodos. Savoirs Et Textes 12 (2012). methodos.revues.org/ 2940

45 Perler, Dominik; and Haag, Johannes. Ideen. Reprasentationalismus in der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin, New York: Walter De Gruyter, 2010. Pessin, Andrew. Uncommon Sense: the Strangest Ideas from the Smartest Philosophers. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2012. Peters, Joseph Etienne. Language and Vision in the Writings of Jonathan Swift and George Berkeley. Ph. D. dissertation: University of Leeds, 2010. Peterschmitt, Luc. “La critique du réalisme leibnizien dans le De Motu de Berkeley.” Astérion (asterion.revues.org) 1 (2003): 112-26. _____. “Berkeley et les hypothèses mathématiques.” Archives internationales d´histoire des sciences 150-151 (2003): 184-97. _____. Sciences de la nature et philosophie dans la pensée de Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Université Lille 3, 2005. _____. “Can Berkeley Be an Instrumentalist? Towards a Reappraisal of Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science.” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008): 19-31. _____. “Berkeley and Chemistry in the Siris. The Rebuilding of a Non-Existent Theory.” In Parigi (2010b), 73-85. _____. “Un impensé des principes de la connaissance humaine: la physique mathématique.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 19-29. ______. “L’aspect formel du langage de la physique dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 413-22. _____. “Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision: Science or Metaphysics?” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 15-33. _____. “Quelle preuve de l’existence de quel Dieu? À propos de la ‘demonstration de l’existence de Dieu’ dans Alciphron IV.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 193-204. Philipse, H. “Leidt consequentie altijd naar de duivel? Een analyse van de argumentatie voor Berkeleys immaterialisme.” Wijsgerig perspectief 26 (1985-86) : 45-57. Phillips, Mariléne. “Berkeley sur la volonté: Quelques ‘notes philosophiques’.” Revue internationale de philosophie 39 (1985): 252-58. _____. “L’actualité et l’immaterialisme de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 373-76. _____. “On Translating Berkeley’s Principles.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 609-16. Piper, William Bowman. “Kant’s Contact with British Empiricism.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 12 (1978/79): 174-89. Pitcher, George. Berkeley. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977. _____. “Berkeley on the Perception of Objects.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 99-105. _____. Berkeley on Vision: a Nineteenth-Century Debate. New York: Garland, 1988. _____, ed., The Philosophy of George Berkeley. 15 vols. New York: Garland, 1988-1989. Popkin, Richard H., ed., Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: a Pan-American Dialogue. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996. Porter, Noah. Two-hundredth Birthday of Bishop George Berkeley [1885]. Reprint. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger, 2010. 46 Priest, Stephen. The British Empiricists: Hobbes to Ayer. London: Penguin, 1990. Printz, Amanda Lewis. The Scope and Significance of George Berkeley's Language Model. Ph. D. Dissertation: University of Southern California, 2007. Pritchard, Timothy. “Meaning, Signification, and Suggestion: Berkeley on General Words.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (2012): 301-317. Pucelle, Jean. “Berkeley a-t-il été influencé par Malebranche?” Etudes philosophiques 1 (1979): 19- 38. Puryear, Stephen. “Idealism and Scepticism: A Reply to Brueckner.” Theoria 79 (2013): 290-93. Pycior, H. M. “Mathematics and Philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 265-86. Quintanilla Navarro, Ignacio. George Berkeley (1685-1753). Madrid: Ediciones del Orto, 1995. _____. Materia y sentido en George Berkeley. Universidad Complutense de Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones Contribuidor Rábade Romeo, Sergio Fecha de Publicación (2002). Rabate, Jean-Michel. “Berkeley entre Joyce et Beckett.” Études irlandaises 11 (1986): 57-76. Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., and McCarty, Richard ; with Allhoff, Fritz and Vaidya, Anand Jayprakash, eds. Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Malden, MA Oxford: Blackwell, 2007. Raiger, Michael Kenneth. Coleridge, Hartley, and Berkeley: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics, 1794-1796, Ph. D. diss., New York University, 2002. Raine, Kathleen. “Berkeley, Blake and the New Age.” Thought 51 (1976): 356-77. Rashid, Salim. “Berkeley’s Querist and its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12 (1990): 38-60. _____. “Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money.” History of Political Economy 34 (2002): 818-19. _____. “Berkeley’s Querist and Its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12 (1990): 38-60. Raynor, David. “Minima Sensibilia in Berkeley and Hume.” Dialogue 19 (1980): 196-200. _____. Review of L’Oeuvre de Berkeley by Pierre Dubois.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 19-21. _____. “Berkeley’s Ontology.” Dialogue 26 (1987): 611-20. _____. “Hume and Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. M. A. Stewart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990. Pp. 231-50. _____. “Berkeley et la théorie des minima sensibilia.” In Charles (2004), 89-102. Rebaglia, Alberta. “Essere e percepire una struttura linguistica: il pensiero di George Berkeley quale presupposto filosofico.” Epistemologia 12 (1989): 125-52. Reininger, Robert. Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Reprint d. Ausg. München: E. Reinhardt, 1922. Nendeln/Liechtenstein: Kraus, 1973. Richetti, John J. Philosophical Writing: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1983. _____. “Empiricist Philosophers and Eighteenth-Century Autobiography.” In A History of English Autobiography, ed. Adam Smyth, 148-161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

47 Richmond, Alasdair. Berkeley’s Principles of Human Knowledge: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum, 2009. _____. Review of New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought, ed. Stephen H. Daniel. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2010): 724-26. Rickless, Samuel C. Review of A Metaphysics for the Mob by John Roberts.” Philosophical Review 118 (2009): 244-47. _____. “The Relation between Anti-abstractionism and Idealism in Berkeley’s Metaphysics.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2012): 723-40. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination by Georges Dicker. Berkeley Studies 23 (2012): 15-39. _____. Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism. Corby: Oxford University Press, 2013. _____. “Where ‘Exactly’ Does Berkeley Argue for the Existence of God in the Principles?” History of Philosophy Quarterly 30 (2013): 147-60. _____. “Berkeley’s Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 99-122. _____. “Berkeley’s Argument for the Existence of God in the Three Dialogues.” In Storrie (2018a), 84-105. _____. “Is Shepherd’s Pen Mightier Than Berkeley’s Word?” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (2018): 317-30. Rioux-Beaulne, Mitia. “Plaisir sensible et beauté morale dans le troisième dialogue de l’Alciphron: Berkeley face à la naissance de l’esthétique.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 205-22. Risse, Heinz. Berkeley und der Demiurg: Requiem auf das Spiel in der Sackgasse. Bielefeld: Merlin, 1983. Roberts, John R. A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. _____. “‘Strange Impotence of Men’: Immaterialism, Anaemic Agents, and Immanent Causation.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2010), 411-31. _____. “A Mystery at the Heart of Berkeley's Metaphysics.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy V, ed. by Daniel Garber and Stephen Nadler (2010), 214-46. _____. “Berkeley on the Philosophy of Language.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 421-34. _____. “A Puzzle in the Three Dialogues and Its Platonic Resolution.” In Storrie (2018a), 146-59. _____. “Berkeley on Evil.” In The History of Evil, vol. IV: The History of Evil in the 18th and 19th Centuries, edited by Douglas Hedley, Chad Meister, and Charles Taliaferro. New York: Routledge, 2018. Pp. 5-21. Robinson, Howard M. ‘Abstract Ideas’ and Immaterialism.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 617-22. _____. “Berkeley” in Bunnin (1996), 694-708. _____, ed., George Berkeley, Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. _____. Review of Berkeley’s Thought by George Pappas. Mind 113 (2004): 571-75. _____. “Two Berkeleian Arguments about the Nature of Space.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 79-90. 48 _____. “Idealism and Perception: Why Berkeleyan Idealism is Not as Counterintuitive as it Seems.” In Cowan and Spiegel 2016, 71-90. _____. “Berkeley and Twentieth-Century Realist–Anti-Realist Controversies.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017): 63-82. Robles, José A. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley I.” Diánoia 26 (1980): 151-77. _____. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley II.” Diánoia 27 (1981): 166-85. _____. “Matemáticas hasta el siglo XVIII. ¿Qué son los números?” Diánoia 28 (1982): 155-71. _____. “Berkeley y su crítica a los fundamentos del cálculo.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 10:2 (1984): 141-50. _____. “Génesis de la noción de sustancia espiritual en la filosofia de Berkeley.” Diánoia 30 (1984): 67-87. _____. “George Berkeley, Commentarios filosoficos, Introduccion y traduccion.” Contrafuerte (1985): 4-11. _____. “Berkeley y los minima.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 1-12. _____. “Berkeley: argumentacion filosofica.” Revista Latino Americano de Filosofia 12 (1986): 45- 53. _____. “The Mottoes in the Analyst Debate.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 15-16. _____. “Berkeley: distinción y separación.” Dialogues 24 (1989): 81-102. _____. “Hobbes, Berkeley y las ideas abstractas.” Revista de Filosofia 12 (1989): 43-54. _____. The Mathematical Ideas of George Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Stanford University, 1990. _____. Estudios berkeleianos. Mexico:Universidad Autónoma de México, 1990. _____.”Berkeley: Scepticism, Matter and Infinite Divisibility.” In Popkin (1996). _____. “Filosofia natural y religion. Los casos de Newton, Boyle y Berkeley.” Revista Patagonica de Filosofia 2 (2001): 43-56. _____. “Philosophie naturelle et religion: les cas de Newton, Boyle et Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 11-22. _____. “Newton y Berkeley: atomistas epicureos.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 30 (2004): 7-35. Rodrigues da Silva, Marcos. “Instrumentalismo e explicaçao cientifica no De motu de Berkeley.” Scientiae Studia 4 (2006): 101-14. Rogers, Karen. “Two Mistakes About Berkeley.” Philosophy (1980): 552-53. Ronchi, Vasco. Commento alla Nuova teoria della visione di George Berkeley. Firenze: Baccini & Chiappi, 1973. Estratto da: Atti della fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 29 (1974): 871-88.. Rose, Thomasine. Verbivocovisual: the Presence of Bishop Berkeley in Finnegans Wake. S. L.: Bellefonte Editeur, 1981. Rosenbaum, S. E. “Berkeley’s World of Ideas.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1985): 421-34. Ross, Ian Campbell and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and the Authorship of The Memoirs of Signor Gaudentio di Lucca.” Irish University Review 41 (2011): 196-201. Rotem, Ornan. “An Encounter Between Philosophy and Religion.” Asian Philosophy 3 (1993): 15- 28.

49 Ryann, Todd. “A New Account of Berkeley’s Likeness Principle.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2006): 561-80. Ryder, John. “Cadwallader, Colden, Samuel Johnson, and the Activity of Matter: Materialism and Idealism in Colonial America.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996): 248-72. Saidel, Eric. “Making Sense of Berkeley’s Challenge.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 10 (1993): 325-39. Saldarriaga, Santiago Echeverri. “Subjetividad e inmaterialismo en la filosofía de George Berkeley.” Estudios de Filosofía 27 (2013): 127-48. Santos, Antônio Carlos dos. “Berkeley face à Mandeville: de Fable des abeilles à la Lettre à Dion.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 163-77. _____. “Berkeley E Mandeville: Religião E Moralidade.” Filosofia Unisinos 12 (2011): 56-69. Sanyal, Shyamali. “George Berkeley on the Problem of Universals.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 10 (1983): 7-12. Saporiti, Katia. Die Wirklichkeit der Dinge: eine Untersuchung des Begriffs der Idee in der Philosophie George Berkeleys. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2006. _____. “George Berkeley.” In Kindler Kompakt Philosophie 18. Jahrhundert, ed. Johannes Rohbeck, 41-43. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 2016. Sari, Mehmet Ali. “Descartes, Locke, and Berkeley on Primary and Secondary Qualities” [in Turkish]. Yeditepe'de Felsefe 10 (2011): 150-89. Sasso, Javier. “Immaterialismo y verificacionismo en Filosofia del entendimiento.” Revista Latinamericana de Filosofia 8 (1982): 247-54. Scala, André. Berkeley. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2007. Scallett, Jeffrey. “A Sequel to Berkeley’s Dialogues: Excerpts.” Dialogue 17 (1974): 1-6. Schabas, Margaret. “Hume's Monetary Thought Experiments.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39 (2008), 161-69. Schliesser, Eric. “On the Origin of Modern Naturalism: The Significance of Berkeley's Response to a Newtonian Indispensability Argument.” Philosophica (Belgium) 76 (2005), 45-66. _____. “Wijsbegeerte tussen wetenschap en moraal in een post-newtoniaanse wereld: Berkeley, Hume, en Adam Smith.” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 100 (2008): 244-46. Schliesser, Eric; Smith, Justin E. H.; and Lærke, Mogens, eds. Philosophy and Its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Schumacher, R. “Critique of Representationalism and Immaterialism. An Overview of the Scholarly Literature on the Theories of George Berkeley.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58 (2004): 279-97. _____. “The Cognitive Impenetrability of Optical Illusions. George Berkeley's Theory of Visual Perception in the Context of New Approaches”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58 (2004): 505-26. _____. “Berkeley on Visible Figure and Extension.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 108- 20.

50 _____.“Action in perception? Empirical and philosophical arguments against the enactive approach to perception.” Perception 37 (2008): 433-45. Schwarte, L. and Saporiti, K. Vom Gebrauch der Vorstellung. Ideen bei George Berkeley. München: Fink, 2011. Schwartz, Claire. “Berkeley and His Contemporaries: The Question of Mathematical Formalism.” In Parigi (2010b), 43-56. _____. “Berkeley et les idées générales mathématiques.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 31-44. _____. “Berkeley et la norme mathématique: de l’Alciphron à l’Analyste.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 423-33. Schwartz, Robert. Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. _____. “Seeing Distance from a Berkeleian Perspective.” In Muehlmann (1995), 217-30. _____. Visual Versions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. Schwerin, Alan. “On Hume’s Defense of Berkeley.” Open Journal of Philosophy 5, no. 6 (2015): 327-37. Sekerci, Ahmet Erhan. “An Idealist Immaterialist: George Berkeley” (in Turkish). Felsefe Dünyasi: Türk Felsefe Dernegi Yayini 61 (2015), 153-185. Sgarbi, Marco. The Aristotelian Tradition and the Rise of British Empiricism: Logic and Epistemology in the British Isles. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. Sherry, David. “The Wake of Berkeley’s Analyst: Rigor Mathematicae?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1987): 455-80. _____. “Don’t Take Half the Way: On Berkeley’s Mathematical Reasoning.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24, 2 (1993): 207-25. Silver, Bruce. “The Conflicting Microscopic Worlds of Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 343-49. _____. “The Invisible World of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” New Scholasticism 51 (1977): 142-61. _____. “A Reply to Professor Mirarchi.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 714-15. Silver, Bruce. “Boswell on Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Revisiting the Stone.” Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (1993): 437-48. Skemp, Sheila. “George Berkeley’s Newport Experience.” Rhode Island History 37 (1978): 53-63. Smalligan Marušić, Jennifer. “Comments on Michael Jacovides’ ‘How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive’.” Philosophia 37 (2009), 431-36. Sobrevilla, David. “El idealismo de Berkeley.” Areté: Revista de Filosofía 7 (2013): 331-52. Sorensen, Roy. Seeing Dark Things: The Philosophy of Shadows. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Sosa, Ernest. “Russell, Berkeley y la materia objectivo.” Critica 7 (1975): 35-41. _____. “Berkeley’s Master Stroke [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 16-18. _____, ed., Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987. Souza, José Carlos de. “Deus na Filosofia Empírica.” Caminhando 13 (2008): 105-20.

51 Spicker, Gideon. Uber das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaft der Philosophie: Kant, Hume und Berkeley. Hildesheim: Olms, 2006. Spiegel, James S. “The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Faith and Philosophy 13 (1996): 216-35. _____. “The Christian Psychology of George Berkeley.” Journal of Psychology and Christianity 17 (1998): 335-46. _____. “Idealism and the Reasonableness of Theistic Belief.” In Cowan and Spiegel, 11-28. _____. “Berkeleyan Idealism and Christian Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 12 (2017): 1-9; https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12400. Spinicci, Paolo. La visione e il liguaggio: considerazioni sull’applicabilità del modello linguistico all’esperienza. Milano: Guerini, 1992. _____, ed., George Berkeley, Teoria della visione. Milano: Guerini, 1995. Spryszak, Przemysław. “Berkeley on the Nature of Mind” [in Polish]. Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 39 (2011): 25-41. _____. Review of George Berkeley: Próba stworzenia nowej teorii widzenia i inne eseje filozoficzne by A. Grzelinski. Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 42 (2014): 163-65. Stack, George J. “Berkeley’s Concept of Existence.” Modern Schoolman 53 (1976): 281-89. _____. Berkeley’s Analysis of Perception. New York: Lang, 1991. Stadelmann, Elke. Philosophie aus der Besinnung des Denkens auf sich selbst: Berkeley und Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1999. Stammler, Gerhard. Berkeleys Philosophie der Mathematik. Unveränd. Neudr. D. Ausg. Berlin 1921.Vaduz: Topos, 1978. Stapleford, Scott. “The Worst Argument in the World – Defended.” Think 16 (2017): 15-23. _____. “What’s the Point of a Dreaming Argument?” Think 18 (2019): 31-34. _____ and Wentzell, Alexander. “Was Berkeley an Extracranialist?” Philosophical Forum 50 (2019): 225-38. Stanford, W. B. “Berkeley and the Libyan Monster.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 10-11. Steinkraus, Warren E. “A Piece of Sensible Bread.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1978): 619- 25. _____. Review of Images of Berkeley by Ray Houghton, David Berman, and Maureen Lapan. Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 17-18. Stepanenko, Pedro. “La concepcion berkeleyana del yo.” Contrafuerte (1985): 12-18. Stephens, John, ed., The Guardian. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press, 1982. _____. “Berkeley and Lady Burlington: a Footnote.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 16-17. Sterling, M. C. “Berkeley contra el realismo.” Sapienta 33 (1978): 153-55. Stewart, Jon. “Borges and the Refutation of Idealism: A Study of ‘Tlon Uqbar, Orbis Tertius’.” Ideas y Valores (1996): 64-99. Stewart, M. A. “William Wishart, an Early Critic of Alciphron.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 5-9. _____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 19.

52 _____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 25-46. _____. “Add MS. 39305.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 6-13. _____. Review of Berkeley, Oeuvres, tom. I, ed. Geneviève Brykman. Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 10-13. _____. “Berkeley’s Introduction Draft.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 10-19. _____. “Reid on Locke and Personal Identity: Some Lost Sources.” Locke Newsletter 28 (1997): 105-16. Stoneham, Tom. Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 2002. _____. Review of Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge, by Robert J. Fogelin. Mind 112 (2003): 126-30. _____. “George Berkeley: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.” In Central Works of Philosophy: The Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. John Shand. Montreal: McGinn-Queen’s University Press, 2005. _____. “Berkeley’s ‘Esse is percipi’ and Collier’s ‘Simple’ Argument.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 23 (2006): 211-24. _____. “When Did Collier Read Berkeley?” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2007): 361-64. _____. “Berkeley: Arguments for Idealism.” In The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics, ed. P. Simons, R. Le Poidevin, A. McGonigal, and R. Cameron. London: Routledge, 2009. Pp. 119-30. _____. “Berkeley.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, ed. T. O’Connor and C. Sandis. Oxford: Blackwell, 2010. Pp. 496-504. _____. “Catching Berkeley’s Shadow.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 116-36. _____. “Three Dialogues between Hylas, Philonous and the Sceptic.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 121-40. _____. “Berkeley and the Problem of Consciousness.” In Consciousness and the Great Philosophers: What Would They Have Said about Our Mind–Body Problem? Edited by Stephen Leach and James Tartaglia. Oxford: Routledge-Taylor Francis, 2017. Pp. 96-105. _____. “Some Issues in Berkeley’s Account of Sense Perception.” In Storrie (2018a), 24-39. _____. “Action, Knowledge and Embodiment in Berkeley and Locke.” Philosophical Explorations 21 (2018): 41-59. Storhoff, Gary. “The Artist as Universal Mind: Berkeley’s Influence on Charles Johnson.” African American Review 30 (1996): 539-48. Storrie, Stefan. “Anne Berkeley’s Contrast: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 22 (2011): 9-14. _____. “Berkeley’s Apparent Cartesianism in De Motu.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (2012): 353–366. _____. “What is it the Unbodied Spirit cannot do? Berkeley and Barrow on the Nature of Geometrical Construction.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2012): 249-68. _____. “The Scope of Berkeley’s Idealism in the 1734 Edition of Three Dialogues.” In Storrie (2018a), 160-75. _____, ed. Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. 53 Strathern, Paul. Berkeley en 90 minutos [Translation of Berkeley in 90 Minutes]. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España Editores, 2015. Stroll, Avrum. “Two Lines of Argumentation in Berkeley’s Principles: a Reply to George S. Pappas.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 139-44. Stroud, Barry. “Berkeley vs. Locke on Primary Qualities.” Philosophy 55 (1980): 149-66. _____. Philosophers Past and Present. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011. Struve, Horst; Müller-Hill, Eva; and Witzke, Ingo. “Berkeleys Kritik am Leibniz´schen calculus.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 46 (2015): 63-82. Stuart, James. “Berkeley’s Appearance/Reality Distinction.” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8 (1977): 119-30. Stubenberg, L. “Divine Ideas: the Cure-All for Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (1990): 221-49. Szabo, Zoltan Gendler. “Berkeley’s Triangle.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1995): 41-63. _____. “Sententialism and Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Philosophical Quarterly 55 (2005): 462- 74. Szalek, Piotr. “O genezie Berkeleyowskiej definicji ‘istnienia’ [“On the Genesis of the Berkeleian Definition of ‘Existence’ (in Polish)].” In Stanislaw Janeczek, ed. Oblicza filozofii XVII wieku [Faces of the XVIIth-Century Philosophy]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL [Catholic University Press], 2008, 93-113. _____. “On the Origins of the Berkeleian Definition of ‘Existence’.” Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rethoric 15 (2009): 145-59. Szymańska, Marta. “George Berkeley’s Philosophy in Polish Studies.” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008), 32-40. _____. Review of Recovering Bishop Berkeley: Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context by Scott Breuninger. Berkeley Studies 22 (2011): 15-19. _____. “Berkeley’s Theodicy in A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (1710).” Studia z Historii Filozofii 5 (2014): 149-60. _____. “Berkeley’s Double Understanding of ‘Social Appetite’.” In Charles 2015, 147-60. _____. “Unity, Diversity, and Order: National Religion in Berkeley’s Works 1735-1752.” Berkeley Studies 27 (2018): 3-18. Täljedal, Inge-Bert. “‘Esse est percipi’ and Percept Identity in C. J. Boström’s Philosophy.” Idealistic Studies 43 (2013): 63-70. Taranto, Domenico. “Berkeley critico di Mandeville. Note su etica ed epistemologia nella polemica con i freethinkers.” Pensiero politico 14 (1981): 243-61. Taranto, Pascal. Du déisme à l’athéisme: la libre-pensée d’Anthony Collins. Paris: Editions Honoré Champion, 2000. _____. “Le personnage de Diagoras.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 361-70. _____. “Alciphron ou la théorie du complot.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 223-36. _____. “Le travail de la sagesse: philosophie et exercice spirituel chez George Berkeley.” In Charles 2015, 259-76. _____. “The work of wisdom: Philosophical and spiritual exercise in George Berkeley.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 9 (2015): 259-75. 54 Taylor, C. C. W. “Berkeley’s Theory of Abstract Ideas.” Philosophical Quarterly 28 (1978): 97- 115. Tennant, R. C. “The Anglican Response to Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity.” Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (1982): 73-90. Thaliath, Babu. Der prozeß der geometrisch-optischen Perspektivierung in der visuellen Raumwahrnehmung. Freiburg: Universität Freiburg, 2001. Thomas, Andrew. “God, Vision and Power.” Studia Theologica: Nordic Journal of Theology 62 (2008): 80-97. Thomas, George H. “Berkeley’s God Does Not Perceive.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 163-68. _____, ed., “George Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries; Explanatory Notes by A. A. Luce.” Alliance, Ohio: Mount Union College, 1976. Thrane, Gary. “Berkeley’s Proper Objects of Vision.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 243-60. Tipton, Ian. “ ‘Ideas’ in Berkeley and Arnauld.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 575-84. _____. “Berkeley’s Imagination.” In Sosa (1987), 85-102. _____. “Descartes’ Demon and Berkeley’s World.” Philosophical Investigations 15 (1992): 111-30. Tomeček, Marek. Review of Essays on the Concept of Mind in Early-Modern Philosophy, eds. Petr Glombíček and James Hill. Reflexe 40 (2011): 120-22. _____. “The a priori and mathematics in Berkeley” (English/Czech). Filosoficky Casopis 62 (2014): 369-85. _____. Berkeley’s Common Sense and Science. New York: Lang, 2014. Tomida, Yasuhiko. “Ideas Without Causality: One More Locke in Berkeley.” Locke Studies 11 (2011): 139-54. _____. Locke, Berkeley, Kant: From a Naturalistic Point of View. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2012. _____. “The Lockean Materialist Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Locke Studies 10 (2010): 179-97. _____. Locke, Berkeley, Kant: from a Naturalistic Point of View. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2015. Tommy, C. A. “A Berkeleian Model of Memory.” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 22 (2005), 93-121. Tooley, Michael. “The Skeptical Challenges of Hume and Berkeley: Can They Be Answered?” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 85 (2011): 27-46. Torode, Brian. “A Berkeleian Correction.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 15. Trapnell, W. H. The Treatment of Christian Doctrine by Philosophers of the Natural Light from Descartes to Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988. Tricaud, François. “L’immaterialisme est-il réfutable?” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 591- 96. Triepke, Sandra. Berkeleys Immaterialismus: In Bezugnahme auf sein Hauptwerk “Prinzipien über die Menschliche Erkenntnis.” Norderstedt Germany: Grin, 2009. Trotsak, Alexey. “Seeming confusion in interpretation: George Berkeley and Immanuel Kant” (Russian). Vestnik IKBFU (2014, Issue 6): 14-22.

55 Tsai, Denis Hsin-An. “God and the Problems of Evil in Berkeley.” Philosophical Review 6 (1983): 125-36. Turbayne, Colin M. “Grosseteste and an Ancient Optical Principle.” Isis 50 (1959): 467-72. _____, ed., Berkeley. Critical and interpretive essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982. _____. “Hume’s Influence on Berkeley.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 259-69. _____. Metaphors for the Mind: The Creative Mind and its Origin. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991. Tweyman, Stanley. “Berkeley’s Denial of the Denial of Blind Agency: a Reply to Kenneth P. Winkler.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 145-51. Uchman, Jadwiga. “George Berkeley’s ‘esse est percipi’ and Martin Buber’s I-Thou relationship in Samuel Beckett’s oeuvre.” Anglica Wratislaviensia 52 (2014): 51-62. Umbaugh, Bruce. On Berkeley. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson, 2000. Urmson, J. O. Berkeley. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1982. _____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science in the Siris.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 562- 66. _____. “Berkeley on Beauty.” In Berman (1993), 179-84. Van Cleve, James. “Berkeley, Reid, and Sinha on Molyneux’s Question.” In Sensory Integration and the Unity of Consciousness, eds. David J. Bennett and Christopher S. Hill. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2014, 193-208. _____. “Reid’s Opposition to Berkeley.” In Belfrage and Brook (2017), 299-313. Van Iten, Richard J. “Berkeley’s Pragmatic Bent: Its Implications for His Social Philosophy.” In Charles 2015, 83-98. Vermeulen, Ben. “Berkeley and Nieuwentijt on infinitesimals.” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 1-5. Vesey, Godfrey, ed., Berkeley: Reason and Experience. London: Open University Press, 1982. Vernon, David. Review of Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes by Robert Schwartz. Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 9-14. Vienne, Jean-Marie. “Les rapports entre raison et foi a la lumière de la vision.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1997): 45-58. _____. “La substance, de Descartes à Berkeley. ” In Brykman (1997), 149-63. Vienne, Jean-Michel. “Suggestion, habitude et jugement: la part cachée de la Théorie de la vision de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 79-102. _____. “Notions métaphysiques, notions physiques.” In Charles (2004), 59-71. Vincente Burgoa, Lorenzo. “Critica de las ideas abstractas: la abstraccion como simple semantica.” Revista de Filosofia (Daimon) 12 (1996): 49-60. Wahl, Russell and Westphal, Jonathan. “Descartes, Leibniz and Berkeley on Whether We Can Dream Marks on the Waking State.” Studia Leibnitiana 24 (1992): 177-81. Wainwright, William J. “Berkeley, Edwards, Idealism, and the Knowledge of God.” In Farris et al. 2016, 35-54. Waldenfels, B. “Esse est percipi. Studies on George Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Philosophische Rundschau 49 (2002): 271-72. 56 Walker, Ralph Charles Sutherland. The Real in the Ideal: Berkeley’s Relation to Kant. New York: Garland, 1989. Walmsley, Peter. The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Ward, Ian D. S. “George Berkeley: Precursor of Keynes or Moral Economist on Underdevelop- ment?” Journal of Political Economy 67 (1959): 31-40. _____. “George Berkeley as an Economist: Reply.” Journal of Political Economy 68 (1960): 307- 10. Warnock, Geoffrey J. Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982. _____. “On Passive Obedience.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 555-62. Watson, Richard A. “Berkeley Is Pronounced Barclay.” Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 1-3. Watt, Dan. “Esse est Percipi: Beckett and Berkeley’s Silent Conversation.” In Beckett Re- Membered: After the Century, ed. James Carney, Leonard Madden, Michael O’Sullivan, and Karl White, 74-88. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2012. Watt, Robert. Review of Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism by Samuel C. Rickless. European Journal of Philosophy 24 (2016): 988-92. Waxman, Wayne. Kant and the Empiricists: Understanding Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. _____.“Kant’s Debt to the British Empiricists.” In Bird (2006), 93-107. Weinberg, Julius R. Abstraction, Relation, and Induction: Three Essays in the History of Thought. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1965. Weldon, Susan. “Direct Realism and Visual Distortion: A Development of Arguments from Thomas Reid.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (1982): 355-68. Wenz, Peter. “Berkeley’s Christian Neo-Platonism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 537- 46. _____. “The Books in Berkeley’s Closet.” Hermathena 128 (1980): 33-40. _____. “Berkeley and Kant on the Analytic and Synthetic a priori.” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 1-5. _____. “Berkeley’s Two Concepts of Impossibility: a Reply to McKim.” Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (1982): 673-80. West, Peter. “Berkeley on the Relation Between Abstract Ideas and Language in Alciphron VII.” Ruch Filozoficzny 74 (2018): 51-70. _____. “Reid and Berkeley on Scepticism, Representationalism, and Ideas.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 17 (2019): 191-210. Wheeler, Kathleen M. “Berkeley’s Ironic Method in the Three Dialogues.” Philosophy and Literature 4 (1980), 18-32. Wilke, Andrea-Ursula. Philosophie und Stil: eine Verhältnisbestimmung dargestellt an Berkeley, Kant und Wittgenstein. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2006. Williamson, Timothy. Review of Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration, eds. John Foster and Howard Robinson. Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 5-7. Williford, Kenneth. “Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the Manuscript Introduction”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2003): 271-301. 57 _____, and Jakapi, Roomet. “Berkeley’s Theory of Meaning in Alciphron VII.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009):99 – 118. Wilson, Catherine. “On Imlay’s ‘Berkeley and Action’.” In Muehlmann (1995), 183-96. Wilson, Fred. “Berkeley’s Metaphysics and Ramist Logic.” In Easton (1997). Wilson, Margaret Dauler. “The ‘Phenomenalisms’ of Berkeley and Kant.” in Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, ed. A. W. Wood. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984, 157-73. _____. “Berkeley on the Mind-Dependence of Colors.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1987): 249-64. _____. “The Phenomenalisms of Leibniz and Berkeley.” In Sosa (1987), 3-22. _____. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. _____. Kant and “The Dogmatic Idealism of Berkeley.” Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008. Winkler, Kenneth P., ed. George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Hackett, 1982. _____. “The Authorship of Guardian 69.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 1-6. _____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 20. _____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 81-100. _____. “Berkeley on Abstract Ideas.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 65 (1985): 63-80. _____. “Berkeley, Newton and the Stars.” Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 17 (1986): 23-42. _____. Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. _____, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. _____. “Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs.” In Winkler (2005), 125-65. _____. “Marvellous Emptiness: Berkeley on Consciousness and Self-Consciousness.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 223-50. _____. “Continuous Creation.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (2011): 287-309. _____. Review of Berkeley's Idealism: A Critical Examination by Georges Dicker. Philosophical Review 123 (2014): 541-44. Wintzer, Heinrich. George Berkeley: vernachlässigte Ressourcen des logischen Positivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1998. Wisdom, J. O. “Berkeley’s Criticism of the Infinitesimal.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (1953): 22-25. Woolhouse, R. S. “Berkeley and ‘A Famous Man of Modern Times’.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 5-8. Woozley, A. D. “Berkeley on Action.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 293-307. _____. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions and Theory of Meaning.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 427-34.

58 Yandell, Keith. “Berkeley, Realism, Idealism, and Creation.” In Farris et al. 2016, 73-82. Yetter-Chappell, Helen. “Idealism Without God.” In Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics, edited by Tyron Goldschmidt and Kenny Pearce. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. Pp. 66-81. Yolton, John W. “Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (1975): 145-65. _____. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984. _____. Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984. _____, ed., Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester Press, 1990. _____. “The Term ‘Idea’ in Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy.” In Idea, ed. Marta Fattori and Massimo Luigi Bianchi. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, 1990, 237-54. Young, Theodore A. Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. Modern Philosophy. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1985. Zakatistovs, Atis. “Berkeley a-t-il anticipé le problème de l’induction?” In Charles (2004), 23-36. Zukowski, Bartosz. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Existence: A Linguistic Approach” [in Polish]. Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy 30 (2011): 93-108.

59