DOCSLIB.ORG

The Geology of the Burke Quadrangle, Vermont

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE GEOLOGY OF THE BURKE QUADRANGLE, VERMONT By BERTRAM G. WOODLAND off tC 200 STE STREET VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. DOLL, State Geologist Published by VERMONT DEVELOPMENT DEIARTMENT MONTPELIER, VERMONT BULLETIN No. 28 1965 - Fiure 1. Fiontispie c Burke Mountain, Umpire \Iountain (left), and the northern spur of Kirby Mountain right) are resistant e-'se' of homteled Gilc \lount'&in fonuttion jj nuuite. View southeist\vards from near Marshall Swhool. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 9 INTRODUCTION ...................... 10 Location ........................ 10 Methods of study .................... 10 Acknowledgments .................... 12 Physiography ...................... 14 Settlement ....................... 17 Previous work ..................... 18 STRATIGRAPHY ...................... 19 General statement .................... 19 Thicknesses ..................... 19 Age of formations ................... 20 Sequence ....................... 20 Albee Formation ..................... 21 Amphibolite ...................... 22 Waits River Formation ................. 23 Impure limestone ................... 23 Pelitic rocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Psammitic beds .................... 25 Amphibolite ...................... 27 Light-colored hornblende quartzose bands . . . . . . . 31 Meta-acid igneous rocks ................ 31 Gile Mountain Formation ................. 34 Quartzose phvllite ....................35 Pelitic rocks ...................... 39 Amphibolite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Amphibole-bearing quartzite .............. 42 Dark hornblende-rich bands .............. 43 Meetinghouse Slate ................... 44 INTRUSIVE RocKs ..................... 45 Granitic rocks and hornfels-granite complexes ........ 45 Kirby-Burke-Umpire-East Haven mountains and Hobart Ridge ....................... 45 Southeast Victory ....................50 Newark ........................52 East Mountain .....................53 Seneca Mountain ....................55 PA GE McSherry Mountain-Newark Street ........... 57 Contact relations and mode of emplacement.......... S8 Granitic dikes ..................... 59 Mafic dikes ....................... 60 Metamorphosed mafic dikes ............... 62 STRUCTURE ........................ 62 Minor structural features ................. 62 Planar features .................... 63 Primary planar feature: Bedding (S 0 ) ......... 63 Secondary planar features . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Schistosity (S1 ) .................. 66 False cleavage (S 2 ) ................ 67 Cleavage in pelitic beds . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Cleavage in quartzose rocks ........... 81 Cleavage in calcarcous rocks ........... 82 Analysis of attitudes of S 2 cleavage ......... 83 Slip sense on S i .................. 85 Relationship of S 1 and S 2 .............. 87 Joints ...................... 88 Acid dike trends ................. 89 Faults ...................... 89 Minor folds ...................... 89 Earlier B 1 folds ................... 89 Later B 2 folds ................... 92 Linear features .................... 96 Fold axes ..................... 96 B 1 folds ..................... 97 B 2 folds ..................... 97 Lincation ..................... 100 B 1 Imeation ................... 101 B 2 lineation ................... 101 Lineation girdles ................. 103 Axial directions .................. 105 Rodding ..................... 105 Boudinage .................... 107 Relationships of Burke structural data .......... 107 Major structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1122 METAMORPHISM ...................... 117 Mineralogy of the metamorphic rocks ........... 118 PAGE Characteristic mineral assemblages ............ 130 In pelitic and semi-pelitic rocks ............. 130 In quartzose rocks ................... 130 In amphibole quartzite (light-colored variety) ....... 131 In amphibole quartzite (dark-colored variety) ....... 131 In amphibolite .................... 131 In impure limestone .................. 132 Discussion ....................... 133 Textures and metamorphic grade ............ 133 Metamorphism in the horofels ............. 137 Muscovitization .................... 143 SUMMARY OF THE GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF THE BURKE QUADRANGLE 144 ECONOMIC GEOLOGY .................... 146 BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................... 147 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS List of Plates PLATE PAGE 1. Geologic map of the Burke quadrangle ........in pocket 2. Planar features map of the Burke quadrangle .....in pocket 3. Linear features map of the Burke quadrangle .....in pocket 4. Way-up of bedding (S 0) and shear sense on schistosity (S 1) of the Burke quadrangle . in pocket 5. Contoured stereogramS of structural data of the Burke quadrangle . in pocket List of Figures FIGURE PAGE 1. (Frontispiece) View of Umpire, Burke, and Kirby mountains 2 2. Location of the Burke quadrangle ............11 3. Index letters to Burke quadrangle ninths .........13 4. View of northwestern portion of the Burke quadrangle . 15 5. Photornicrograph of Albee staurolite-garnet-mica-quartz schist 22 6. Sharp minor folds in Waits River impure limestone . 25 7. Flow folding in Waits River impure limestone ......26 8. Flow folding, jointing, and rodding in Waits River impure limestone .......................27 FIGURE PAGE 9. Quartz veins and masses in flow-folded Waits River impure limestone ....................... 28 10. Photomicrograph of Waits River impure limestone 29 11. Reticulate weathered surface of amphibolite ....... 30 12. Photomicrograph of Waits River amphibolite ........31 13. Photomicrograph of sheared amphibolite ......... 32 14. Photomicrograph of meta-quartz keratophyre ........ 33 15. Typically banded Gile Mountain strata ......... 36 16. Photomicrograph of Gile Mountain quartz schist ..... 37 17. Photomicrograph of a folded quartz vein ......... 38 18. Photomicrograph of Gile Mountain staurolite-biotite schist 40 19. Photomicrograph of Gile Mountain andalusite hornfels. 41 20. Photomicrograph of Gile Mountain dark hornhlende-rich hand 44 21. Mixed granite and hornfels (agmatite) .......... 46 22. Contact between Gile Mountain hornfels and granite . . 47 23. Migmatite ...................... 48 24. Contact between caic-silicate hornfels and granite ..... 49 25. So, S1 , and S2 relationships in banded phyllite ....... 68 26. S2 cleavage in quartzose and pelitic phyllite ....... 69 27. B 2 folding in typically banded Gile Mountain strata . . . 70 28. Cleavage mullions of a quartz vein ........... 71 29. Microfolding of schistosity (Si) ............. 72 30. a) Microfolding of schistosity (S i ) ............ 73 30. b) Enlarged portion of Fig. 30a ............. 74 30. c) Enlarged portion to left of Fig. 30a .......... 75 31. Photomicrograph of microfolding in Gile Mountain banded phyllite ....................... 76 32. Photomicrograph of microfolding in banded phyllite from the transition zone between the Waits River and Gile Mountain formations ...................... 77 33. Well-developed S 2 cleavage and relict schistosity (S i) . . 78 34. S and S2 relationships in Waits River banded phvllite . . 79 35. Microfolding in Gile Mountain phyllite ......... 80 36. Photomicrograph of microfolded schistosity (S i) ...... 81 37. Photomicrograph of S 2 axial plane cleavage ........ 82 38. Open fold and quartz veins cut by fracture cleavage .... 83 39. Fracture cleavage in Gile Mountain quartzose phyllite . . 84 40. Shear cleavage in Gile Mountain quartzose phyllite . . . 85 41. Shear fold in Waits River quartzose phyllite ....... 86 FIGURE PAGE 42. Later (13 2 ) fold in Gile Mountain banded phyllite ..... 90 43. Steeply-plunging later (13 2 ) fold in Gile Mountain banded phyllite ....................... 91 44. Plunging earlier (13 1) folds in the Gile Mountain formation . 92 45. Tight isoclinal earlier (13 1 ) folds in the Waits River formation 93 46. Earlier (13 1) minor fold with axial plane schistosity (S 1 ) . . 94 47. Isolated core of earlier (13 1) minor fold .......... 95 48. Refolded folds in Waits River impure limestone ...... 96 49. Refolded isoclinal fold in Gile Mountain banded phyllite . . 97 50. Later (13 2) minor fold in Gile Mountain banded phyllite . . 98 51. Drag folds in phyllite ................. 99 52. Later (13 2 ) minor folds in Gile Mountain banded phyllite . . 100 53. Photomicrograph of folded quartz veins in phyllite . . . . 101 54. Two lineations on schistosity (S i) of phyllite ....... 103 55. Three lineations on schistosity (S 1) of phyllite ....... 104 56. Composite stereograms of structural data of the Burke quad- rangle ........................ 106 57. Synoptic stereograms of structural data of the Burke quad- rangle and its subareas ...............108, 109 58. Map of generalized, statistically-derived structural data of the Burke quadrangle and its subareas ........... 110 59. Photomicrograph of staurolite in Gile Mountain hornfels . . 121 60. Photomicrograph of andalusite-sillimanite schist ...... 123 61. Photomicrograph of sillimanite-garnet hornfels ...... 124 62. Photomicrograph of "shimmer aggregate" in hornfels . . . 125 63. Photomicrograph of staurolite-sillimanite hornfels ..... 126 64. Photomicrograph of kyanite-andalusite-fibrolite-bearing rock 127 65. Photomicrograph of staurolite-garnet schist ........ 128 66. Photomicrograph of staurolite-garnet-chlorite schist . . . . 135 67. Photomicrograph of staurolite-garnet-sillimanite hornfels . . 139 THE GEOLOGY OF THE BURKE QUADRANGLE,
Recommended publications
  • Strike and Dip Refer to the Orientation Or Attitude of a Geologic Feature. The

    Strike and Dip Refer to the Orientation Or Attitude of a Geologic Feature. The

    Name__________________________________ 89.325 – Geology for Engineers Faults, Folds, Outcrop Patterns and Geologic Maps I. Properties of Earth Materials When rocks are subjected to differential stress the resulting build-up in strain can cause deformation. Depending on the material properties the result can either be elastic deformation which can ultimately lead to the breaking of the rock material (faults) or ductile deformation which can lead to the development of folds. In this exercise we will look at the various types of deformation and how geologists use geologic maps to understand this deformation. II. Strike and Dip Strike and dip refer to the orientation or attitude of a geologic feature. The strike line of a bed, fault, or other planar feature, is a line representing the intersection of that feature with a horizontal plane. On a geologic map, this is represented with a short straight line segment oriented parallel to the strike line. Strike (or strike angle) can be given as either a quadrant compass bearing of the strike line (N25°E for example) or in terms of east or west of true north or south, a single three digit number representing the azimuth, where the lower number is usually given (where the example of N25°E would simply be 025), or the azimuth number followed by the degree sign (example of N25°E would be 025°). The dip gives the steepest angle of descent of a tilted bed or feature relative to a horizontal plane, and is given by the number (0°-90°) as well as a letter (N, S, E, W) with rough direction in which the bed is dipping.
  • National Register of Historic Registration Form

    National Register of Historic Registration Form

    NPS Form 10-900 >:p. OMB No. 10024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) i ^-——_______ }(l . ' I United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Forni (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name The Toll House other names/site number Stone House; Administration Building, Darling State Forest Park 2. Location street & number _2028 Mountain Road not for publication n/a city or town Burke vicinity n/a state Vermont code VT county Caledonia code 005 zip code 05832 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
  • GEOL360 Structural Geology Problem Set #3: Apparent Dip, Angles And

    GEOL360 Structural Geology Problem Set #3: Apparent Dip, Angles And

    GEOL360 Structural Geology Name______________________ Date_______________________ Problem Set #3: Apparent Dip, Angles and Orientations Part 1. Apparent dip 1. In a mine, a tabular dike has an apparent dip of 14°, 270° in one tunnel and 25°, 169° in another tunnel (here we use azimuth directions). Using a stereonet, what is the attitude (strike and dip) of the dike? _____________________ 1. Along a vertical railroad cut a bed has an apparent dip of 20°, N62°W. The bed strikes N67°E. What is the true dip? _____________________ 1. Suppose a fault strikes N10°E and its apparent dip trends S26°E and plunges 35°. Using a stereonet, determine the true dip of the fault. _____________________ Part II. Angle between two lines 1. What is the angle between the following two lines? a. 35°, S10°E a. 15°, N23°W _____________________ 1. What is the angle between the following two lines? a. 12°, N8°E a. 40°, S19°W _____________________ 1. What is the angle between the following two lines? a. 70°, S38°E a. 49°, N15°E _____________________ Part III. Angle between two planes 1. What is the angle between the following two planes? a. N27°E, 85°SE a. N89°W, 7°NE _____________________ 2. What is the angle between the following two planes? a. 315°, 20°NE a. 165°, 24°SW _____________________ 3. What is the angle between the following two planes? a. 014°, 10°SE a. N18°W, 37°NE _____________________ Part IV. Orientation of the intersection of two planes: 1. Determine the orientation of the intersection of the following two planes: a.
  • Topic B - Geologic Processes on Earth

    Topic B - Geologic Processes on Earth

    Topic B - Geologic Processes on Earth 1 Chapter 6 - ELEMENTS OF GEOLOGY 6-1 The Original Planet Earth Planet Earth formed out of the original gas and dust that prevailed at the origin of the solar system some 4.6 billion years ago. It is the only known habitable planet so far. This is due to the concurrence of special conditions such as its position with respect to the Sun giving it the right temperature range, the preponderance of necessary gases and a shielding atmosphere that protects it from lethal solar radiation. Early Earth has however not always been so welcoming to life. Initially Earth was rich in silicon, iron and magnesium oxide. Heat trapped inside Earth along with radioactive decay which tends to produce more heat helped heavier elements to sink to the depths leaving lighter elements closer to the surface. Within the first 500 million years, an inner core formed of mostly solid iron surrounded by a molten iron outer core. The mantle formed of rocks that can deform. The thin outer crust that sustains life is composed mostly of silicate rocks. The various natural processes inside and on the surface of Earth make it a dynamic system which has evolved into what we know now. These include the oceans and the continents, the volcanoes that form the mountains and erosion that erodes the landscape, earthquakes that shape the topography and the movement of earth’s crust through the plate tectonics process. mantle outer core crust inner core 35 700 2885 5155 6371 Depth in km Figure 6-1: Schematics showing the Earth’s solid inner core, liquid outer core, mantle and curst.
  • AGAP Antarctic Research Project Http

    AGAP Antarctic Research Project Http

    AGAP Antarctic Research Project Image by Zina Deretsky, NSF Image from - http- //news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6145642 Build Your Gamburtsev Mountain Formation Mountain Building: Remember mountain ranges can be built in different ways. With the Gamburtsev Mountains there are several possible theories, but with the mountains under ice, there is little data available. Let’s focus on the two main theories, collision and hot spot volcanic activity. Select one theory to support. Your task is to create a model of your mountain building event and explain why you picked it, how your model supports your theory, and what ‘tools of the trade’ from our geophysical tools you could use to test your theory. The Gamburtsevs, the Result of a Collision? Mountain belts are formed along boundaries between the Earth’s crustal (lithospheric) plates. Remember, the Earth’s outside crust is made up of plates (or sections) with pieces that are slowly moving. When the different plates collide they can push or fold the land up forming raised areas, or mountains. The European Alps and the Himalayas formed this way. The sections of Earth’s continental crust are constantly shifting. During the Cambrian Period, a time between ~500 and 250 Ma, the piece of crust that would become Antarctica (we will call this proto-Antarctica) was on the move! Early in the Cambrian it was located close to the equator, a much Proto Antarctica Other Continent milder climate than its current location, but as the Cambrian Period advanced proto-Antarctica moved slowly south. The collision theory suggests that as these pieces of continent moved, like bumper cars they collided with each other.
  • FM 5-410 Chapter 2

    FM 5-410 Chapter 2

    FM 5-410 CHAPTER 2 Structural Geology Structural geology describes the form, pat- secondary structural features. These secon- tern, origin, and internal structure of rock dary features include folds, faults, joints, and and soil masses. Tectonics, a closely related schistosity. These features can be identified field, deals with structural features on a and m appeal in the field through site inves- larger regional, continental, or global scale. tigation and from remote imagery. Figure 2-1, page 2-2, shows the major plates of the earth’s crust. These plates continually Section I. Structural Features undergo movement as shown by the arrows. in Sedimentary Rocks Figure 2-2, page 2-3, is a more detailed repre- sentation of plate tectonic theory. Molten material rises to the earth’s surface at BEDDING PLANES midoceanic ridges, forcing the oceanic plates Structural features are most readily recog- to diverge. These plates, in turn, collide with nized in the sedimentary rocks. They are adjacent plates, which may or may not be of normally deposited in more or less regular similar density. If the two colliding plates are horizontal layers that accumulate on top of of approximately equal density, the plates each other in an orderly sequence. Individual will crumple, forming mountain range along deposits within the sequence are separated the convergent zone. If, on the other hand, by planar contact surfaces called bedding one of the plates is more dense than the other, planes (see Figure 1-7, page 1-9). Bedding it will be subducted, or forced below, the planes are of great importance to military en- lighter plate, creating an oceanic trench along gineers.
  • Dike Orientations, Faultblock Rotations, and the Construction of Slow

    Dike Orientations, Faultblock Rotations, and the Construction of Slow

    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL 103, NO. B1, PAGES 663-676, JANUARY 10, 1998 Dike orientations, fault-block rotations, and the constructionof slow spreading oceaniccrust at 22 ø40'N on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge R6isfn M. Lawrence and Jeffrey A. Karson Divisionof Earthand Ocean Sciences, Duke University,Durham, North Carolina StephenD. Hurst DepartmentofGeology, The University ofIllinois, Urbana, Illinois Abstract. The firstpalcomagnetic results from oriented dike samples collected on the Mid- AtlanticRidge shed new light on thecomplex interplay between magmatic accretion and mechanicalextension at a slowspreading ridge segment. An uppercrustal section about 1.5 km thickis exposed along a west-dippingnormal fault zone that defines the eastern median valley wall of thesouthern segment of theMid-Atlantic Ridge south of theKane fracture zone (MARK area). Twodistinct groups of dikesare differentiated onthe basis of orientationand palcomagnetic characteristics.One group, on the basis of thepalcomagnetic data, appears to bein itsoriginal intrusionorientation. This group includes both ridge-parallel, vertical dikes as well as dikes in otherorientations, calling into question assumptions about uniform dike orientations at oceanic spreadingcenters. The second group consists ofdikes that have palcomagnetic directions that are distinctfrom the predicted dipole direction, and we interpret them to have been tectonically rotated. Thesealso occur in manyorientations. The spatial relations between rotated and nonrotated dikes indicatethat intrusion, faulting, and block rotation were contemporaneous beneath the median valleyfloor. Nonrotated dikes exposed onthe eastern median valley wall indicate that there has beenno net rotation of thisupper crustal assemblage since magmatic construction ceased. Hence slipand associated uplift probably occurred inthe fault zones' present orientation. These results providethe basis for a generalmodel of mechanical extension anddike intrusion forthis segment ofthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
  • Magma Genesis and Arc Evolution at the Indochina Terrane Subduction

    Magma Genesis and Arc Evolution at the Indochina Terrane Subduction

    feart-08-00271 July 13, 2020 Time: 10:29 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 14 July 2020 doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.00271 Magma Genesis and Arc Evolution at the Indochina Terrane Subduction: Petrological and Geochemical Constraints From the Volcanic Rocks in Wang Nam Khiao Area, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand Vanachawan Hunyek, Chakkaphan Sutthirat and Alongkot Fanka* Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand Volcanic rocks and associated dikes have been exposed in Wang Nam Khiao area, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, northeastern Thailand where complex tectonic setting was reported. These volcanic rocks are classified as rhyolite, dacite, and andesite whereas dikes are also characterized by andesitic composition. These dikes clearly Edited by: cut into the volcanic rocks and Late Permian hornblende granite in the adjacent area. Basilios Tsikouras, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei Rhyolite and dacite are composed of abundant plagioclase and quartz whereas andesite Reviewed by: and andesitic dike contain mainly plagioclase and hornblende with minor quartz. The Toshiaki Tsunogae, volcanic rocks typically show plagioclase and hornblende phenocrysts embedded in University of Tsukuba, Japan fine-grained quartz and glass groundmass whereas dike rocks contain less glass matrix Gianluca Vignaroli, University of Bologna, Italy with more albitic laths. P–T conditions of crystallization are estimated, on the basis of Al- *Correspondence: in-hornblende geobarometry and hornblende geothermometry, at about 4.5–5.5 kbar, Alongkot Fanka 861–927◦C and 4.8–5.5 kbar, 873–890◦C for the magma intrusions that fed volcanic [email protected]; [email protected] rocks and andesitic dikes, respectively. Whole-rock geochemistry indicates that these rock suites are related to calc-alkaline hydrous magma.
  • Structural Geology

    Structural Geology

    2 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY Conventional Map A map is a proportionate representation of an area/structure. The study of maps is known as cartography and the experts are known as cartographers. The maps were first prepared by people of Sumerian civilization by using clay lens. The characteristic elements of a map are scale (ratio of map distance to field distance and can be represented in three ways—statement method, e.g., 1 cm = 0.5 km, representative fraction method, e.g., 1:50,000 and graphical method in the form of a figure), direction, symbol and colour. On the basis of scale, maps are of two types: large-scale map (map gives more information pertaining to a smaller area, e.g., village map: 1:3956) and small: scale map (map gives less information pertaining to a larger area, e.g., world atlas: 1:100 km). Topographic Maps / Toposheet A toposheet is a map representing topography of an area. It is prepared by the Survey of India, Dehradun. Here, a three-dimensional feature is represented on a two-dimensional map and the information is mainly represented by contours. The contours/isohypses are lines connecting points of same elevation with respect to mean sea level (msl). The index contours are the contours representing 100’s/multiples of 100’s drawn with thick lines. The contour interval is usually 20 m. The contours never intersect each other and are not parallel. The characteristic elements of a toposheet are scale, colour, symbol and direction. The various layers which can be prepared from a toposheet are structural elements like fault and lineaments, cropping pattern, land use/land cover, groundwater abstruction structures, drainage density, drainage divide, elongation ratio, circularity ratio, drainage frequency, natural vegetation, rock types, landform units, infrastructural facilities, drainage and waterbodies, drainage number, drainage pattern, drainage length, relief/slope, stream order, sinuosity index and infiltration number.
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms

    Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms

    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
  • The Geology of the Lyndonville Area, Vermont

    The Geology of the Lyndonville Area, Vermont

    THE GEOLOGY OF THE LYNDONVILLE AREA, VERMONT By JOHN G. DENNIS VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. DOLL, Stale Geologist Published by VERMONT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MONTPELIER, VERMONT BULLETIN NO. 8 1956 Lake Willoughby, seen from its north shore. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......................... 7 INTRODUCTION 8 Location 8 Geologic Setting ..................... 8 Previous Work ...................... 8 Purpose of Study ..................... 9 Method of Study 10 Acknowledgments . 11 Physiography ...................... 11 STRATIGRAPHY ....................... 16 Lithologic Descriptions .................. 16 Waits River Formation ................. 16 General Statement .................. 16 Distribution ..................... 16 Age 17 Lithological Detail .................. 17 Gile Mountain Formation ................ 19 General Statement .................. 19 Distribution ..................... 20 Lithologic Detail ................... 20 The Waits River /Gile Mountain Contact ........ 22 Age........................... 23 Preliminary Remarks .................. 23 Early Work ...................... 23 Richardson's Work in Eastern Vermont .......... 25 Recent Detailed Mapping in the Waits River Formation. 26 Detailed Work in Canada ................ 28 Relationships in the Connecticut River Valley, Vermont and New Hampshire ................... 30 Summary of Presently Held Opinions ........... 32 Discussion ....................... 32 Conclusions ...................... 33 STRUCTURE 34 Introduction and Structural Setting 34 Terminology ......................
  • Thirty-Second Report on the Status of the Petroleum Cleanup Fund 10

    Thirty-Second Report on the Status of the Petroleum Cleanup Fund 10

    Thirty-Second Report on the Status of the Petroleum Cleanup Fund 10 VSA § 1941 January 2020 This report includes a review of Petroleum Cleanup Fund receipts and disbursements for the fiscal year 2019, an evaluation of the financial stability of the fund and its effectiveness in meeting its legislative intent, as required by 10 V.S.A. §§ 1941(e), 1942(a), and 1942(b). This report also includes an evaluation of assistance related to underground farm and residential heating fuel storage tanks and aboveground storage tanks, and the need for continuing assistance, and includes recommendations. Prepared by: The Petroleum Cleanup Fund Advisory Committee PETROLEUM CLEANUP FUND ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS Julie Moore: Secretary, Agency of Natural Resources Chuck Schwer: Designated representative of the Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Kevin Gaffney: Designated representative of the Commissioner, Department of Financial Regulation Erin Sigrist: Vermont Petroleum Association (Vermont Retail & Grocer’s Association) Senator: Brian Campion Representative: Mike Marcotte Scott Bigger: Designated representative of Lowell T. Spillane, Retail gasoline dealer Dick Browne: Global Montello Group Corp., a licensed gasoline distributer Matt Cota: Vermont Fuel Dealers Association Peter Bourne: Bourne’s Energy, a licensed fuel dealer Peter Tucker: A licensed real estate broker Cover photo: An AST in Halifax, Vermont that was red tagged for multiple violations and representative of many of the older tanks still in service that are at a higher risk of a release. 2 Executive Summary This is the 32nd annual report of the Petroleum Cleanup Fund (PCF) Advisory Committee. This report will provide a review of receipts and disbursements for fiscal year 2019, in accordance with 10 V.S.A.