1 in the High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF JUNE 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA WRIT PETITION NO.101326/2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SIDDAVVA W/O SIDDAPPA KANKAWADI AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: TEGGIHAL, NOW AT 6TH CROSS, MUANVALLI, TQ. SAUNODATTI DISTRICT: BELAGVI ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. PAVAN B. DODDATTI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MALLANGOUDA, S/O SHANKREPPA MUGALI AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MUNAVALLI, TQ. SAUNDATTI DISTRICT: BELAGAVI 2. GADIGEPPA, S/O SHIDDAPPA KANKAWADI AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TEGGIHAL, TQ. SAUNDATTI DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. 3. MALLAPPA, S/O SHIDDAPPA KANKAWADI AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 2 R/O: TEGGIHAL, TQ. SAUNDATTI DISTRICT: BELAGAVI 4. ADIVEPPA, S/O SHIDDAPPA KANKAWADI AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TEGGIHAL, TQ. SAUNDATTI DISTRICT: BELAGAVI 5. ASHOK, S/O SHIDDAPPA KANKAWADI, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TEGGIHAL, TQ. SAUNDATTI DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. 6. RATNAWWA, W/O SHIVANAND HOSAMANI, AGE: 50, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O KADKOL, TQ. RAMDURG, DISTRICT: BELAGVI. ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING ANNEXURE-H, THE ORDER DATED 10/01/2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SAUNDATTI, IN O.S.51/2012. REJECTING IA NO.17 AND 18 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC, IT BEING UNSUSTAINABLE IN LAW AND ALLOW THE IA NO.17 AND 18. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: 3 ORDER On the previous date of hearing, this court had granted time for compliance of office objections with a direction that, the petition will be dismissed if the office objections are not complied. Today, case called out thrice, petitioner and petitioner’s counsel remained absent. No representation. Office objections are not complied. In view of the order passed on the previous date of hearing, there are no grounds to adjourn the case. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE EM/-.