Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 123(4), 1996, pp. 330-349

The Pocono till barrens: shrub savanna persisting on soils favoring forest1 Roger Earl Latham2, John E, Thompson, Sarah A. Riley and Anne W. Wibiralske3 Department of Geology, University of , Philadelphia, PA 19104-6316

LATHAM,R. E., J. E. THOMPSON,S. A. RILEYAND A. W. WIBIRALSKE(Department of Geology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6316). The Pocono 811 barrens: shrub savanna persisting on soils favoring forest. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 123: 330-349. 1996.-A previously undescribed shrub savanna community, which we refer to as the Pocono till barrens, occurs mainly on soils weathered from glacial till of Illinoian age on the southern Pocono Plateau of Pennsylvania. Unlike most "barrens" in east-central North America, its soils are not sandy or shallow to bedrock; the same deep, fine-loamy soil series underlie the barrens and nearby northern hardwoods forest. An unusual abundance of rare and animal species in and near the barrens has attracted the attention of scientists and biodiversity conservation professionals. In an effort to understand the ecological dynamics of the Pocono till barrens and why the barrens are different from their mostly forested surroundings, we undertook studies of vegetation history, landscape patterns, plant species distributions and water table depth. The Pocono till barrens (1) are old, pre-dating European settlement of the area; (2) have burned frequently and over large areas throughout their recorded history; (3) presently cover more than 22 krn2 adjacent to a belt of xeric ridgetop barrens totaling approximately 18 km2;(4) have in abundance usually found in moist or wet soil conditions living side-by-side with those normally associated with xeric habitats; and (5) include several vegetation types which are distributed on the landscape, in part, in association with a soil moisture gradient. The Pocono till barrens appear to flout the conventional wisdom that barrens vegetation reflects droughty, nutrient-poor soils. Although the Pocono till barrens substantially pre-date European settlement of the area, fire is clearly the key to maintenance of barrens vegetation in this system. We hypothesize that biotic factors are more important than abiotic factors in determining distributions of barrens and forest vegetation on the southern Pocono Plateau. Key words: barrens, heathlands, Illinoian glacial till, Kalmia angustifolia, Pennsylvania, Pinus rigida, Quercus ilicijolia, Rhododendron canadense, Vaccinium.

"Barrens" in eastern North America have re- agreement on an all-encompassing definition for ceived a surge of attention recently from bota- barrens vegetation is still lacking (Homoya nists and ecologists (e.g., Dirig 1994; Heikens 1994). In traditional usage in temperate eastern et al. 1994; Tyndall 1994; Vickery et al. 1994; North America, where closed-canopy forests are Abrarns and Orwig 1995; Bernard and Seischab the norm, the term barrens refers to areas with 1995; Carbyn and Catling 1995; Titus et al. sparse tree cover (but it does not include wet- 1995; Dieffenbacher-Krall 1996). Widespread lands or areas dominated by early successional species following disturbance). Woodlands also may be called barrens if they are dominated by The research was supported by grants to Arthur H. species perceived as indicators of droughty soils, Johnson from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and low-nutrient conditions or other stresses, es- to Roger Latham from The Nature Conservancy. ZPresent address: Department of Biology, Swarth- pecially Pinus banksiana Lamb. (jack pine), Pi- more College, Swarthrnore, PA 19081-1397 nus rigida Mill. (pitch pine) and Pinus virgini- We are grateful to Mark Anderson, Tony Davis, ana Mill. (scrub pine). Stephen Demos, David Gibson, Art Johnson, Peter Pe- Pennsylvania is endowed with an exceptional traitis, Ann Rhoads, Stewart Ware, Dan Zarin and two anonymous reviewers for critique and other assistance. abundance and diversity of barrens communi- Thanks are due also to Duane Braun, Tina Hall, Dixon ties. It has the northernmost examples of Ap- Miller, Bill Sevon and personnel of the Pennsylvania palachian shale barrens (Platt 195 1; Keener Bureau of Forestry for kindly supplying data and other 1971), the largest area of temperate eastern information; John Gless for GIs implementation; Lynn North American serpentine barrens (Latham Heilman for historical research; Christine Manville for moss identification; Bob Bartel, Dave Butler, Diane 1993), barrens on sand colluvium (Clarke 1946), Carle, Jeff Castelli, Chris Cianfrani, Stephanie Fein- numerous sandstone and conglomerate ridgetop gold, Etan Gumerman, Michele ~annon,Kathleen barrens, northern Appalachian boulder fields, the Meade, Beth Ragan, Tom Stich, Suzanne Thomas and sparse vegetation of dunes, sand plains and Pam White for data handling; and Bud Cook and Mary Daniel for logistical support. bluffs along Lake Erie's shore, scattered small Received for oublication arch 5. 1995, and in re- limestone and diabase glades (Smith 19911, and vised form ~une'19, 1996. at least one spruce bald. Paradoxically, the larg- 19961 LATHAM ET AL.: SHRUB SAVANNAS OF THE POCONO PLATEAU 331 est of the state's barrens ecosystems is also one of the poorest known in the scientific commu- nity. The system forms an intermittent belt av- eraging about 1 krn in width along 40 km of the southern Pocono Plateau (part of the Appala- chian Plateaus physiographic province) and a small part of the adjoining Ridge and Valley province in northeastern Pennsylvania. Quercus ilicifolia Wang., Kalmia angustifolia L., Rho- dodelzdron canadense (L.) Torr., Vaccinium an- gustifolium Ait. and numerous other shrub spe- cies dominate these barrens, with Pinus rigida scattered throughout and clumped in a few woodland stands. We refer to the area and its vegetation as the Pocono till barrens because till (unsorted glacial drift) dominates the underlying geology. In the late 1980s, ecologists exploring the Po- con0 till barrens began recognizing several fea- Fig. 1. Location of study area (Pocono Plateau boundary from Berg et al. 1989). tures of the system that seemed to set it apart as highly distinctive from other barrens in eastern North America. There was an apparent concor- are now known to harbor more than 30 region- dance between the barrens and a large expanse ally rare and 10 globally rare and endangered of Illinoian-aged glacial till, rare in eastern species of plants and animals, with high expec- North America (Crow1 and Sevon 1980). The tation of additional discoveries. The Nature U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conser- Conservancy has named the area as its highest vation Service classified the deep soils under- priority in the state for land protection, restora- lying the barrens as having fine-loamy, not tion and management for biodiversity. sandy, textures with high water-holding capacity Success in conserving diversity and ecosys- (Fisher et al. 1962; Lipscomb 1981). Comparing tem function in this unusual landscape will de- soil survey maps with conditions on the ground pend on understanding the ecological dynamics revealed that northern hardwood forest is at least of the Pocono till barrens and why the barrens as likely as barrens vegetation to inhabit the are different from their surroundings. The first same soil series and phases. The most often re- step is to establish how the barrens differ from curring subject in conversations with local in- neighboring vegetation and from other barrens formants was wildfire, with frequent claims that in the region. In this paper we summarize per- the barrens have burned more often and over tinent historical information on the barrens veg- larger areas than anywhere else in the region. etation and describe it at fine and coarse spatial The scientific literature to date on the Pocono scales. We report on preliminary tests of the as- till barrens is limited to reports on methods of sertion that the Pocono till barrens are mesic replacing scrub oak with merchantable timber rather than xeric like most barrens in the region. stands (Burnham et al. 1947; McQuilkin 1961) We conclude by considering to what degree the and a brief site description in a study of plant vegetation's unusual composition may be due to bugs of the family Miridae living on barrens abiotic constraints versus autogenic processes host plants (Wheeler 1991). Scientific interest in originating with the plants themselves. the Pocono till barrens has mounted with the dis- covery in the 1980s that the barrens and vicinity STUDYAREA. The Pocono till barrens fringe contain the greatest concentration of globally the southern margin of the Glaciated Pocono rare plant and animal species-i.e., those that Plateau section, Appalachian Plateaus physio- are endangered or threatened with extinction- graphic province, northeastern Pennsylvania of any terrestrial ecosystem in Pennsylvania (Fig. 1). About 85% of the 1400-km2 Plateau (Davis et al. 1991). The area also comprises the was ice-covered at the height of the Wisconsinan state's second-largest concentration of regionally glaciation (Berg et al. 1989). The glacier left a rare species represented by disjunct and edge- blanket of pulverized rock across most of this of-range populations. The barrens and vicinity area: ground moraine, outwash and ice-contact 332 BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB [VOL. 123

0 NORTH

lliinoian glacial drift &@a Wisconsinan glacial drift \\'IIYllIIV Pocono Plateau escarpment

Fig. 2. Southern Pocono Plateau surficial geology (data from Berg, Bucek 1977; Sevon 1975a, 1975b; Crowl and Sevon 1980). The entire mapped area is 793 km2. stratified drift. The ice stopped short of the es- years ago (Crowl 1980), forms the northern carpment defining the Plateau's southern rim. boundary. Beneath the surface to the south of The southern 15% of the Plateau's area, beyond this strip lies Devonian sedimentary rock, boul- the reach of the Wisconsinan ice, is geologically der colluvium shattered under periglacial cli- complex. The Wisconsinan terminal moraine, matic conditions, alluvium, peat and much de- from which the ice began receding about 15,000 posits, and about 80 km2 of glacial drift depos-

Fig. 3. Southern Pocono Plateau barrens vegetation. The vegetation survey boundary encompasses 406 km2. 19961 LATHAM ET AL.: SHRUB SAVANNAS OF THE POCONO PLATEAU 333 ited by the much earlier Illinoian glaciation species in Pennsylvania (see Rhoads and Klein (Berg 1977; Sevon 1975a, 1975b). 1993), probably because of its anomalously cool The Illinoian till deposits on the southern Po- summers and abundant wetlands. "Island" pop- con0 Plateau and along the base of the adjacent ulations of many vascular plants with mainly bo- escarpment comprise the largest remaining de- real and montane ranges occur on the Pocono posit of Illinoian glacial till in North America Plateau. Most are species characteristic of bogs east of western Ohio (see map, Crowl and Sevon and boreal forests, including Abies balsarnea 1980). At the southern margin of the Pocono (L.) PMill., Arnelanchier bartrarniana (Tausch) Plateau, Illinoian till remnants occur in two dis- M. Roemer, Arceuthobiurn pusillurn Peck, tinct belts (Crowl and Sevon 1980). One lies on lasiocarpa Ehrh., Carex oligosperrna Michx., top of the nearly flat southern end of the Plateau, Carex paupercula Michx., Eriophorurn vagina- parallel and adjacent to the escarpment. The oth- turn L. ssp. spissurn (Fern.) Hulten, Gaultheria er, just to the south, sheaths the lower slopes of hispidula (L.) Muhl. ex Bigel., Glyceria obtusa the escarpment (Braun 1989). (Muhl.) Trin., Juncus jiliformis L., Kalrnia po- The study area centers on the Illinoian till lifolia Wang., Ledurn groenlandicurn Oeder, Ly- plain on top of the Plateau (75"301W, 41°03'N), copodiella inundata (L.) Holub, Muhlenbergia consisting of three adjacent lobes in a 30 X uniJora (Muhl.) Fern., Myrica gale L., Picea 11-krn area (Fig. 2). Mean elevation is approx- rnariana (PMill.) BSP, P. rubens, Srnilacina tri- imately 550 m. The Wisconsinan terminal mo- folia (L.) Desf. and Vacciniurn oxycoccos L. raine meanders along the northern boundary of Some of the disjunct populations are common in the study area, forming a low ridge about 40 m the till barrens, including Carex polyrnorpha, high and 2000 to 2500 m wide. At the escarp- Gentiana linearis, Lycopodiurn hickeyi, Panicurn ment along the study area's southern margin, the boreale, Platanthera blephariglottis and Rho- elevation drops off 250 to 350 m in a horizontal dodendron canadense (see Appendix for author distance of 1200 to 2000 m. attributions of barrens species). The Pocono Plateau and nearby Appalachian Mountain ridges rise to elevations intermediate VEGETATIONHISTORY. Evidence is scant per- between the low plateaus, valleys and coastal taining to prehistoric human influences on the plain to the north, east and south, and the high vegetation of the southern Pocono Plateau. The Appalachian plateaus (Allegheny and Catskill few data gathered so far are consistent with Mountains) to the southwest, west and northeast. small-scale seasonal utilization of the Plateau Despite its modest elevation, the southern Po- from more than 10,000 yr ago to early historic con0 Plateau claims two climatic superlatives. It times (Cruse, et al. 1989; Perazio 1991). coincides with the area of the coolest mean daily The earliest known written mention of the maximum temperatures in summer in Pennsyl- area's vegetation consists of eight words written vania (from map based on 193 1-1960 data, in 1737 on a sketch map by Benjamin Eastburn Dailey 1971). Mean daily maximum, minimum on which a 106-km straight line across the and 24-hour temperatures are 25.2"C, 1223°C southern Pocono Plateau was labeled as running and 19.0°C in July and -1.4"C, -11.7"C and ". . . through a mountainous barren country -6.6"C in January at the nearest temperature re- abounding with pines . . ." (Davis 1876). Pass- cording station (1961-1990 data, Owenby and ing through in late June 1779 various members Ezell 1992). Also, Long Pond has 129.2 cm of General John Sullivan's military expedition mean annual precipitation, the highest of all 161 against the Iroquois wrote of "sunken swamps climatic data stations in Pennsylvania (1961- and burning plains," "the ground universally 1990 data, Owenby and Ezell 1992). Precipita- covered with brush by the name of ground oak tion occurs evenly throughout most of the year, [Quercus ilicifolia]," "the most barren part of with a dip in December-February (median 8.1 the country I ever saw," a "great Swamp, which cm) and a peak in May (median 12.9 cm). is interspersed & barren piney Spots throughout The southern Pocono Plateau is at the bound- very Stony," and land "very poor & barren & ary between the hemlock-white pine-northern I think Such as will never be Inhabited" (Cook hardwoods region northward and the oak-chest- 1887). nut or Appalachian oak forest region to the west, The first botanist known to visit the area was south and east (Braun 1950; Kiichler 1964). De- Frederick Pursh, on 13 and 14 June 1807, when spite its relatively low elevation, the Plateau the southern Plateau was still virtually uninhab- hosts the greatest concentration of boreal plant ited and untouched by lumbering. His descrip- 334 BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB [VOL.123 tion of the barrens included the observation that used mainly for mine props in the anthracite "coming to the barrens in the top [of the Pla- coal-mining region just southwest of the Plateau teau], I soon found . . . Rhodora [Rhododen- (Taber 1970) and for such items as clothespins dron] canadensis grows here in great plenty" and shoe-pegs (Mathews 1886). After the mar- (Beauchamp 1923). Naturalist and traveler Max- ketable timber was depleted, one of the principal imilian, Prince of the German kingdom of Wied, economic pursuits on the Plateau was wild blue- wrote on passing through the Pocono barrens on berry and huckleberry picking. 25 and 26 August 1832 (in translation; Thwaites FIRE HISTORY.Berry pickers enhanced pro- 1906), "On an elevated plain we were surround- duction by setting large-scale, frequent fires ed, as far as the eye could reach, with woods or (Anonymous 1898; Rowland 1957). An 1897 act thickets of low oaks, from which numbers of authorizing state funding for wildland fire sup- slender, half-dried, short-branched pines (Pinus pression and criminalizing wildland burning in rigida) shot up. . . . in the dry season these Pennsylvania brought the berry pickers into con- woods have often been destroyed by extensive flict with the state (Anonymous 1898), culmi- conflagrations . . . . Even now, clouds of smoke nating in 1942 with the designation of 120 km2 rose at a distance, and announced a fire in this near Long Pond as a "non-protection area" great lonely wilderness. . . . We crossed a valley, (Pyle 1942a, 1942b) in an effort to coerce local with thickets and scorched pines rising above landowners into putting a stop to the burning them . . . . An old path led us half a league over (Wirt 1944). A section through a 31-cm-diame- an eminence; after which we found a valley, ter pitch pine cut in 1946 near Long Pond where the lake, called Long Pond, is situated showed 10 major fires in the 120-yr lifetime of ... . the tree, with six occurring in the last 27 yr Botanist Thomas C. Porter observed on a visit alone (Burnham, et al. 1947). In the vicinity of on 22 to 25 August 1859 "woods, which are this tree, the mean fire frequency increased from here very open & called 'windfalls,' because the one in 23 yr in the 1820s to 1918 to one in 4.5 majority ofthe trees are supposed to have been yr from 1919 to 1946. Single fires of 10 to 20 overturned by the storms & the numerous little km2 were not uncommon on the southern Pla- hillocks found everywhere confirm the suppo- teau from when records were first kept, around sition. Fire too has no doubt done its part. These 1900, until the resumption in the late 1950s of 'Windfalls,' or barrens, are very extensive & fire suppression by the state, the establishment their vegetation quite uniform" (Porter 1859). of local volunteer fire companies, and road and The 77 species mentioned by Porter include vir- equipment improvements resulting in faster re- tually all that characterize the barrens now, in- sponse by fire-fighters (Pa. Bur. Forestry Dist. cluding those that are most abundant (e.g., 19, Stroudsburg, unpubl. data). Amianthium muscaetoxicum, Gaylussacia resi- The Pocono Plateau and vicinity historically nosa [G. baccata], Kalmia angustifolia, Pinus have had the highest forest fire frequency of any rigida, Pyrus arbutifolia var. melanocarpa area of comparable size in Pennsylvania (Haines [Aronia melanocarpa], Quercus ilicifolia, Rho- et al. 1978). Records show no decrease in fire dora Canadensis [Rhododendron canadense], frequency from the late 1950s to the present but Vaccinium Pennsylvanicum [V. angustifolium], they do show a dramatic decrease in the late Viburnum nudurn [V. cassinoides]) and many 1950s in mean area burned per fire (Pa. Bur. that are less conspicuous (e.g., Calamagrostis Forestry Dist. 18, Cressona, and Dist. 19, coarctata [C. cinnoides], Diplopappus umbella- Stroudsburg, unpubl. data). The decrease is due tus [Aster umbellatus], Gentiana Saponaria var. partly to active fire suppression and partly to the linearis [G. linearis], Lygodium palmatum, Pla- steadily increasing fragmentation of natural veg- tanthera blephariglottis, Solidago puberula). etation by roads, utility lines and other effective Agriculture has never occupied more than a firebreaks. The rates of fragmentation and attri- small fraction of the land on the Pocono Plateau tion of natural vegetation increased after the (Mathews 1886; 1938-1939 aerial photographs, completion in the mid-1950s of the first of sev- Cartographic Branch, National Archives, Wash- eral limited-access highway connections to large ington, DC). Small-scale timber cutting started cities and a resulting boom in second-home de- around 1820 (Mathews 1886) but most lumber- velopment. ing occurred from the 1870s to about 1900 (Ta- ber 1970). Presumably because of frequent wild- Methods. LANDSCAPEANALYSIS.We built a fires, most of the hardwood timber was small, computerized geographic information system 19961 LATHAM ET AL.: SHRUB SAVANNAS OF THE POCONO PLATEAU 335

(GIs) depicting a 793-km2 area in and around and Wisconsinan glacial till. Three sites had the Pocono till barrens, using a workstation ver- both barrens and forest plots; three had only for- sion of the computer program ARCIINFO (ver- est. Since our focus was the shrub-dominated sion 5.0.1, 1990, Environmental Systems Re- barrens types, Pinus rigida woodlands were not search Inst., Inc., Redlands, CA). Digitized data sampled. Shrub barrens appeared to be domi- layers include bedrock and surficial geology nated by either Quercus ilicifolia, Rhododen- (Berg et al. 1977; Sevon 1975a, 1975b; Crow1 dron canadense, or a mixture of mostly erica- and Sevon 1980), topography and surface hy- ceous shrubs other than R. canadense, so quotas drology (U.S. Geological Survey 7.5' quadran- were used to insure roughly equal numbers of gle maps), and-in a 406-km2 subset of the samples from these three subjective categories study area-current vegetation patterns (see (i.e., after 20 sampling locations in one subjec- Figs. 2 and 3). Vegetation was mapped by in- tive category were established, additional ran- terpreting 1: 12,000-scale false-color infrared ae- domly chosen locations were rejected if they ap- rial photographs taken in May and June 1992 peared to belong in that category). The break- and ground-truthing. Cover types were classified down of samples by geological and vegetation using a hierarchical system modified from Res- classes is 15 on Illinoian till and 12 on Wiscon- chke (1990) and Smith (1991). sinan till in forest, and 48 and 12 in barrens. The GIs is vector-based, i.e., the data layers Census plots were randomly located on x, are planes tiled with polygons (mapping units). y-coordinate grids at each site, and marked by A practical lower limit on mapping unit size for steel reinforcing bar stakes with numbered alu- the vegetation data layer was set at approxi- minum tags to facilitate long-term measurements mately 0.06 ha. Where mosaics of smaller patch- of successional trends and to monitor the results es occur, polygons were given two, or occasion- of planned controlled experiments. Four 1 X 1 ally three, vegetation type designations. Mosaic m quadrats were staked 3 m from each plot cen- mapping units presented a problem in estimating ter at the cardinal compass points. Percent cover areas covered by individual vegetation types. of each plant species was censused subjectively Our solution was to estimate the average pro- in three strata (<1 m, 1 to 2 m, >2 m). A spe- portions of the area occupied by constituent veg- cies' percent cover in a plot was estimated as etation types, among all polygons of each mul- the mean, across the four quadrats, of the largest tiple-type class. Then we allocated the corre- value among the three strata at each quadrat. sponding fractions of the polygons' areas to the While these plot sizes are rather small for individual vegetation types. measuring canopy cover of tree species, percent We compared the distribution of vegetation values obtained from the plots for all species types among categories of geological parent ma- occurring in non-trivial abundance were not sta- terial by constructing a summary table. Com- tistically different from those obtained on larger parisons between current vegetation and parent plots concentric to subsets of those used in this material distributions are considered to be valid, study (N = 87), using point-contact (N = 19) because surficial geology was mapped using and basal area (N = 65) methods (unpubl. data). landforms and natural and artificial rock expo- Our census included 116 "species," which sures as indicators, not vegetation (W. D. Sevon, were species of vascular plants, species or gen- Pennsylvania Topographic and Geologic Survey, era of mosses, and general morphological types pers. comm.). Although our GIs included de- of lichens. Census data were classified using the tailed information from soil surveys, we did not two-way indicator species analysis (TWIN- compare vegetation patterns with soil attributes SPAN) routine of the computer program CAN- because soil mapping methodology relies heavi- OCO (Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY). All ly on extrapolation from plant cover types inter- subsequent analyses involved comparisons preted from aerial photographs. Thus, our veg- among the vegetation categories resulting from etation map and the Soil Conservation Service's the TWINSPAN classification. All statistical soil survey maps are not truly independent data analyses also were checked using the original layers. subjective vegetation categories; P values in ev- ery case fell on the same side of 0.05 as in the VEGETATIONCENSUS.Vegetation census plots analyses using the TWINSPAN-defined catego- were established in 87 locations at six sites ries and, in most cases where differences were (mean intersite distance 6.8 km), in shrub-dom- significant, the TWINSPAN vegetation types inated barrens and nearby forests on Illinoian yielded lower probabilities of Type I error. 336 BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB [VOL.123

Table 1. Area (km2) of the southern Pocono Plateau study area categorized by vegetation class and geological parent material. Cultural cover types (32.1 kmz) are included in the "Total" column; artificial fill (0.7 kmz) and open water (7.4 km2) are omitted.

Upland Parent material Total (%) forest (%) Barrens (%) Wetlands (%) Bedrock (including colluvium) 179.4 (45) 150.2 (50) 17.9 (43) 1.7 (7) Illinoian drift 115.7 (29) 76.3 (26) 19.8 (47) 3.5 (15) Wisconsinan drift 74.4 (19) 57.9 (19) 2.4 (6) 8.3 (35) Stream and swamp deposits 28.2 (9) 15.9 (5) 1.4 (3) 10.0 (43) Total 397.7 (100) 3003 (100) 41.5 (100) 23.5 (100)

Three of the six vegetation types were sam- both Illinoian and Wisconsinan glacial drift, we pled on both Illinoian and Wisconsinan glacial compared mean cover on the two drift types of till: beech-northern hardwoods forest, mixed de- species with greater than 5% overall mean cover ciduous forest and heath barrens. Using MAN- using multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA). OVA, we compared mean cover within each vegetation type between the two kinds of glacial WATERTABLE STUDY. Wells were installed till, of species with greater than 5% overall mean at 60 of the vegetation sampling plots in 1992- cover. It should be pointed out that each site had 1993 in order to conduct a long-term study of only one kind of till; the site effect is confound- seasonal high water tables. Wells were encased ed with the till-type effect, and results must be using 1-m lengths of 4 cm inside-diameter PVC interpreted with caution. pipe with 7 mm-diameter holes dispersed at We ordinated census data using the detrended about one per 12 cm2. Wells were placed in the correspondence analysis (DCA) routines of the holes left after sampling soil organic horizons computer program CANOCO, comparing distri- and 80 cm of mineral soils. Thus, most wells butions of vegetation types in ordination space. extend 80 cm deeper than the bottom of the hu- We performed DCA with two data sets, one in- mus layer. Some wells are shallower due to cluding all 116 species and the other with only rocky soils. Water table depths were measured the 55 species having greater than 10% overall approximately monthly, except in winter, from frequency among samples. Plots of the first two August 1993 to September 1994. The signifi- DCA sample score axes showed essentially the cance of differences between vegetation types as same pattern in both analyses. We present the defined by TWINSPAN was tested in two ways. DCA of the 55-species data set because the more The proportion of measurements in which a high abundant species are likely to be more important water table was present was compared by ANO- ecologically and because the plot of species VA followed by the TI-method. The depth to the scores may be interpreted more readily if un- water table was compared by repeated-measures cluttered by rare species. multivariate analysis of variance (RMANOVA) We compared vegetation types in two mea- followed by the TI-method. In all cases in which sures of species diversity: species richness the well was dry the water table was assumed (number of species) and Simpson's index of for the RMANOVA to be 1 cm deeper than the dominance: bottom of the well.

Results. LANDSCAPEPATTERNS. The barrens of the southern Pocono Plateau cover approxi- where n, is the abundance of the ith species and mately 41.5 km2 (10% of the vegetation study N is the total abundance of all species (Magurran area) in a few large and many small fragments 1988). The significance of differences between (Fig. 3; Table 1). Of the total area in barrens vegetation types was tested using analysis of vegetation, 21.7 km2 (52%) are the till barrens, variance (ANOVA) and the TI-method (Tukey's overlying Illinoian ground moraine (19.3 km2), HSD test) for multiple comparisons (Sokal and Wisconsinan terminal moraine (1.9 km2) and Rohlf 1995). Simpson's index was reciprocal- Wisconsinan stratified drift (0.50 km2). Barrens transformed to improve homogeneity of vari- overlying alluvium (1.4 km2) closely resemble ances and avert correlation between means and the till barrens, with high proportions of typi- variances. For vegetation types that occurred on cally wetland-dwelling plants (Table 2). The re- 19961 LATHAM ET AL.: SHRUB SAVANNAS OF THE POCONO PLATEAU 337

Table 2. Wetland plant species commonly found in the mesic barrens on the southern Pocono Plateau. Data are from plot censuses and field records. The f[ Beech-nomern wetland indicator status (Reed 1988) represents the : hardwoods forest estimated probability of occurrence in wetlands under natural conditions: OBL, >99%; FACW, 67 to 99%; -f Hemlock-spruce +, higher end of frequency range; -, lower end of frequency range. The designations represent consensus among a large number of botanists and ecologists with ! forest deciduous extensive field experience, reviewed by regional panels e$* to insure reproducibility and defensibility (Reed 1988). " Also included here are moss species that live mainly or exclusively in wet habitats, according to Crum and Anderson (1981).

Aster umbellatus FACW Bartonia virginica FACW Calamagrostis canadensis FACW + Calamagrostis cinnoides OBL Carex stricta OBL Chamaedaphne calyculata OBL Coptis trifolia FACW Rhodora barrens Eleocharis tenuis FACW+ Gentiana linearis OBL Juncus Jiliformis FACW Larix laricina FACW Lygodium palmatum FACW Lyonia ligustrina FACW Nyssa sylvatica FACW + Osmunda cinnamomea FACW Scrub oak barrens Platanthera blephariglottis OBL Polytrichum commune Rhododendron canadense FACW Rubus hisnidus FACW Sphagnum capillifolium Fig. 4. TWINSPAN dendrogram of 87 vegetation Sphagnum magellanicum samples. Samples are underlain by Wisconsinan till Sphagnum palustre (open circles) or Illinoian till (filled circles). Asterisks Spiraea latifolia FACW+ denote samples subjectively considered as belonging Spiraea tomentosa FACW to a different category prior to the analysis: the two Vaccinium corymbosum FACW- flanking the heath barrens group had been identified as Viburnum cassinoides FACW heath barrens; the remainder had been classified as rhodora barrens except for the lowest sample on the dendrogram, which had been identified as forest. mainder is mainly xeric scrub oak barrens over- lying Devonian sandstones and conglomerates VEGETATION.In Pocono till barrens samples, of the Catskill Formation and colluvium derived we recorded 91 species in 34 fam- from the same material (17.9 km2), with few or ilies and 11 moss species in seven families (Ap- no plants usually associated with wetlands. The pendix). Of these, 64 species occurred on at least breakdown of Pocono barrens vegetation types 5% of the census plots (see Appendix super- in the study area is scrub oak barrens, 37.7 km2 scripts). Plants usually found in wetland habitats (55% of this area overlies glacial drift or allu- (Table 2) make up a substantial proportion of the vium); heath barrens, 3.28 km2 (71%); upland till barrens flora. pitch pine woodlands, 3.14 km2 (64%); and rho- TWINSPAN grouped samples at the third lev- dora barrens, 0.67 krn2 (87%). el of division into six categories (Fig. 4). Three Although the barrens occur disproportionately of the categories, representing 60 samples, cor- on Illinoian glacial till (Table 1) they occupy respond closely to the three shrub-dominated only 23% of the area underlain by this parent barrens types identified subjectively prior to data material (Fig. 2). The rest of the Illinoian till is collection; the other three, with 27 samples, are covered by the region's prevailing upland forest forest types (described in Table 3). Some sam- types (57%), cropland and high-density residen- ples were subjectively considered as belonging tial development (16%), and wetland vegetation to a different category prior to the analysis (as- (4%). terisks in Fig. 4). Species composition in most 338 BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB [VOL.123

Table 3. Species with mean cover greater than 5% in community types defined by TWINSPAN. Values are mean percent cover ? SE (standard error of the mean). Vegetation types are: E beech-northern hardwoods forest; T, hemlock-spruce forest; A, mixed deciduous forest; K, heath barrens; R, rhodora barrens; Q, scrub oak barrens.

Forest types Barrens types F T A K R Q Acer rubrum Amelanchier arborea, A. laevis Aronia melanoca~pa Betula populifolia Dennstaedtia punctilobula Fagus grandifolia Gaultheria procumbens Gaylussacia baccata Kalmia angustifolia Picea rubens Pinus rigida Polytrichum commune Prunus serotina Pteridium aquilinum Quercus coccinea Quercus ilicifolia Rhododendron canadense Rhododendron maximum Sphagnum spp. Thelypteris noveboracensis Tsuga canadensis Vaccinium angustifolium Viburnum cassinoides

of these anomalous samples departs markedly folia. The barrens sample with the lowest first- from other samples in the same TWINSPAN- axis score has a high cover of Acer rubrum. defined group. For example, the rhodora barrens The second axis (eigenvalue 0.39) to some ex- sample closest to heath barrens in the TWIN- tent reflects a moisture gradient. Several of the SPAN analysis has no rhodora (Rhododendron wetland species (Table 2) cluster near the top of canadense). One sample (bottom of Fig. 4) was the plot of species scores and the wet hemlock- in the only oak forest stand we sampled; TWIN- spruce forest and rhodora barrens samples clus- SPAN lumped it with the group of samples most ter near the top of the plot of sample scores. It similar in species composition-the scrub oak is not clear that the driest sites and most barrens. The anomalies apparently had little ef- drought-tolerant species cluster at the bottom, fect on statistical comparisons (see Methods). however. Second and higher-order axes in DCA Comparing the plots of sample scores and are prone to "noise" introduced by detrending species scores (Figs. 5 and 6) gives clues to the (Wartenberg et al. 1987) and should be inter- nature of the first and second-axis gradients and preted with caution. highlights the species that best define each veg- The effect of vegetation type was significant etation type. The first axis (eigenvalue 0.81) rep- in ANOVA of both measures of species diver- resents a forest-barrens continuum. The lowest sity (Table 4a and 4b). In pairwise comparisons scoring forest samples are in northern hard- of the six vegetation types using the TI-test (Fig. woods dominated by Fagus grandifolia Ehrh., 7), beech-northern hardwoods forest ranks sig- which did not occur in any barrens samples. The nificantly lower in species richness (mean 13.9 forest sample with a first-axis score nearly as specieslplot) and higher in Simpson's index of high as the barrens samples is dominated by Sas- dominance (mean 0.50) than mixed deciduous safras albidum, Betula populifolia, Quercus forest (26.8, 0.26) and the three barrens types alba and Acer rubrum, all of which occur in the (heath 19.3, 0.23; rhodora 25.3, 0.20; scrub oak barrens, and its understory consists mainly of 21.0, 0.20). Numbers of species in mixed decid- the common barrens shrubs Gaylussacia bac- uous forest and rhodora barrens are significantly cata, Viburnum cassinoides and Quercus ilici- higher than in heath barrens; mixed deciduous 19961 LATHAM ET AL.: SHRUB SAVANNAS OF THE POCONO PLATEAU 339

113 Leu Qb V"$poi ~oitno Ame ~oe .~Jo%ei Amearb/ios Ame. orb -A VOC'~",

0 I 2 3 4 5 6 DCA oxis 1 DCA axls 1 Fig. 5. Ordination of 87 vegetation sample DCA Fig. 6. Ordination of 55 species with >lo% over- scores. Only the 55 species with >lo% overall fre- all frequency. Species around the periphery of the quency among samples were included in this analysis. DCA plot are most useful for discriminating among Symbols denote vegetation types classified by TWIN- vegetation types. Labels consist of abbreviations for SPAN: V,beech-northem hardwoods forest; A, hem- most plant names and arbitrary morphological type lock-spruce forest; 0, mixed deciduous forest; 0, designations for lichens and some mosses. Two species heath barrens; 0,rhodora barrens; 0, scrub oak bar- abbreviations separated by a slash indicate a pair of rens. similar congeners which, in some cases, could not be reliably distinguished in the field. Abbreviations are Ace rub, Acer rubrum; Am, Amianthium muscaetoxi- cum; Ame arb, Amelanchier arborea; Arne lae, Ame- forest is also higher in species richness than lanchier laevis; Aro mel, Aronia melanocarpa; Bet scrub oak barrens. pop, Betula populifolia; Bra ere, Brachyelytrum erec- Beech-northern hardwoods forest samples dif- tum;Cal cin, Calamagrostis cinnoides; Car pen, Carex fer significantly in mean cover between tills pensylvanica; Car pol, Carex polymorpha; Car ves, Carex vestita; Cc, Cornus canadensis; Cop tri, Coptis (Wilks' A = 0.052, Rao's R,,,, = 12.1, P = trifolia; Dal rep, Dalibarda repens; Den pun, Denn- 0:015). Univariate tests show that the differences staedtia punctilobula; Fag gra, Fagus grandifolia; Gau are due to Acer rubrum (mean cover on Illinoian pro, Gaultheria procumbens; Gay bac, Gaylussacia and Wisconsinan till, respectively, 60.2% and baccata; Kal ang, Kalmia angustifolia; Leu gla, Leu- cobryum glaucum; li2, li3, li6, li7, lichens; Lyc obs, 2.0%, F(,,9, = 17.0, P = 0.003) and Thdypteris Lycopodium obscurum; Lys qua, Lysimachia quadri- noveboracensis (L.) Nieuwl. (means 29.& and folia; ml, m2, m5, mosses; Mc, Maianthemum cana- 0.9%, F(,,,, = 14.2, P = 0.004). Heath barrens dense; Me1 lin, Melampyrum lineare; Mit rep, Mitch- samples also differ significantly in mean cover ella repens; Mv, Medeola virginiana; Or, Oryzopsis between tills (Wilks' A = 0.276, Rao's R(,,,,, = racemosa; Osm cin, Osmunda cinnamomea; Pic rub, Picea rubens; Pin rig, Pinus rigida; Pol com, Polytri- 3.3, P = 0.042), with the differences due to chum commune; Pru ser, Prunus serotina; Pte aqu, Aronia melanocarpa (mean cover on Illinoian Pteridium aquilinum; Que ili, Quercus ilicifolia; Rh, and Wisconsinan till, respectively, 2.8% and Rubus hispidus; Rho can, Rhododendron canadense; 26.0%, F(,,,,, = 9.8, P = 0.006), Gaultheriapro- Sas alb, Sassifras albidum; Sol pub, Solidago puber- ula; Sph spp, Sphagnum spp.; Tri bor, Trientalis bo- cumbens = (means 2.3% and 17.9%, F(,,,,, 7.5, realis; Uvu ses, Uvularia sessilifolia; Vac ang, Vac- P = 0.014) and Rhododendron canadense cinium angustifolum;Vac cor, Vaccinium corymbosum; (means 21.8% and 0%, F(,,,,, = 7.9, P = 0.012). Vac myr, Vaccinium myrtilloides; Vac pal, Vaccinium Mixed deciduous forest samples do not differ pallidum; Vib cas, Viburnum cassinoides; Vs, Vaccin- significantly between Illinoian and Wisconsinan ium stamineum. till (Rao's R,,,3, = 2.9, P > 0.05). WATERTABLE. The proportion of measure- of the well. Readers should interpret the results ments in which a high water table was present with the caveat in mind that site and vegetation and the depth to the high water table did not type are partially confounded. Multiple compar- vary significantly between forest and baqrens isons following both analyses had several results samples (Table 4c and 4d) but did differ signif- in common (Fig. 8): beech-northern hardwoods icantly among the six more specific vegetation forest and scrub oak barrens had a high water types (Table 4e and 40. The RMANOVA of table significantly less frequently and, at several depth to the high water table is highly conser- measurements, they had a significantly lower vative, since, when a well was dry, the unknown water table than hemlock-spruce forest, rhodora level of the water table was assumed for the barrens and heath barrens. Mixed deciduous for- analysis to be just 1 cm deeper than the bottom est had a high water table significantly less fre- 340 BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB [VOL.123

Table 4. Analysis of variance results.

(a) Species richness in census plots among six vegetation types. Vegetation type 1273.2 5 254.6 14.1 0.000 Error 1462.1 81 18.1 (b) Species dominance (Simpson's index) in census plots among six vegetation types. Simpson's index was reciprocal-transformed to meet the assumptions of ANOVA. Vegetation type 0.973 5 0.1947 13.6 0.000 Error 1.156 81 0.0143 (c) Proportions of measurements in which a water table less than 1 m deep was present, between forest and barrens. Forestbarrens 0.147 1 0.1475 1.1 0.289 Error 7.218 56 0.1289 (d) Proportions of measurements in which a water table less than 1 m deep was present, among six vegetation types defined by TWINSPAN. Vegetation type 2.493 5 0.4985 5.3 0.001 Error 4.873 52 0.0937

(e) Repeated-measures ANOVA comparing minimum depths to high water table between forest and barrens. Forestbarrens 1 461.7 56 3920.2 0.1 0.733 Time 7 4911.2 392 209.8 23.4 0.000 Interaction 7 155.8 392 209.8 0.7 0.636 (f) Repeated-measures ANOVA comparing minimum depths to high water table among six vegetation types defined by TWINSPAN. Vegetation type 5 9394.7 52 3327.3 2.8 0.025 . Time 7 5888.8 364 178.1 33.1 0.000 Interaction 35 529.1 364 178.1 3.O 0.000 quently and often a lower water table than hem- much of which has a Sphagnum ground layer lock-spruce forest, a less frequent high water ta- and abundant wetland vascular plant species. ble than rhodora barrens, and often a higher wa- The rhodora barrens and portions of the heath ter table than scrub oak barrens. barrens meet the criteria for classification as Hemlock-spruce forest, at several measure- wetlands, but they are distinct from nearby ments, had a significantly higher water table dwarf shrub swamps in species composition and than heath barrens and rhodora barrens. in always lying adjacent to upland (but usually mesic) shrub barrens (Thompson 1995). In these Discussion. Conventional wisdom holds that barrens hydrophytes predominate but they live barrens vegetation in climatic zones with abun- side-by-side with shrub species with small, dant year-round precipitation indicates unusual thickened, lignin-hardened leaves that common- soil conditions, principally droughtiness and low ly live in xeric habitats. The scrub oak barrens nutrients (e.g., Platt 1951; Walker 1954; Reich overlying Illinoian glacial till also have plants and Hinckley 1980; Homoya 1994). Several characteristic of wet or mesic habitats inter- lines of evidence point to the Pocono till barrens spersed with xerophytes. as an exception. On glacial drift deposits of the We measured the water table during years of southern Pocono Plateau, shrub-savanna vege- relatively ordinary precipitation. Thus we could tation does not correlate with xeric conditions. not rule out that barrens vegetation might indi- Analyses of well data showed no significant dif- cate sites that are subject to more severe drying ference between barrens and forest vegetation in than nearby forested sites only during drought the occurrence of a high water table less than 1 years. However, this seems to us unlikely based m from the surface. In the summer, forest and on the prevalence of wetland species in the till barrens had a similar range of wetter and drier barrens, the frequent occurrence of barrens sites. By remote sensing and ground-truthing, downslope from forests, and evidence of the nearly 4 km2 of the Pocono shrub savanna were same wide range of water table depths in the delineated as rhodora barrens and heath barrens, barrens as in the forest. The hypothesis that the 19961 LATHAM ET AL.: SHRUB SAVANNAS OF THE POCONO PLATEAU 341

F T A K R Q Beech- Hemlock- Mixed Heath Rhodora Scrub northern spruce deciduous oak hardwoods L FOREST BARRENS

1 F T A K R Q Beech- Hemlock- Mixed Heath Rhodora Scrub northern spruce deciduous oak hardwoods , FOREST BARRENS Fig. 7. Diversity by vegetation type. A-Species richness and B-Simpson's index (species dominance) by vegetation type. Error bars indicate ?1 standard error of the mean. Significantly different pairs of means (TI-method, a = 0.05) are, for species richness, FA, FK, FR, FQ, AK, AQ, KR and, for Simpson's index, FA, FK, FR, FQ. till barrens soils are no drier during a drought than forest soils on till can be tested only during a drought year. Although the Pocono till barrens occur dis- F T A K R Q Beech- Hemlock- Mixed Heath Rhodora Scrub proportionately on Illinoian glacial till, they oc- northern spruce deciduous oak cupy only 28% of the area underlain by this sub- hardwoods I stratum that has not been cleared for human use. FOREST BARRENS Furthermore, 18% of the barrens overlying un- consolidated materials (glacial drift and alluvi- Fig. 8. Depth of water table by vegetation type. A-Percentage of eight measurements over 14 months um) do not occupy fllinoian till. We have not in which a high water table was present, by vegetation yet identified any topographic factor, such as type. Significantly different pairs of means (T1-meth- slope and aspect, or other vegetation-indepen- od, a = 0.05) are FT, FK, FR, TA, TQ, AR, KQ, RQ. dent predictor, such as soil depth or drainage B-Mean high water table depth in late August 1993 and late August 1994, by vegetation type. Means are class, distinguishing the area covered by barrens significantly different only on the second graph (TI- vegetation from the area covered by the region's method, a = 0.05): FT, FK, FR, TA, TK, TR, TQ, AQ, prevailing forest types. Clearly, parent material KQ, RQ. The numbers of wells in each vegetation type provides at best only a partial explanation for are 10(F), 4(T), 11(A), 17(K), 5(R) and ll(Q). Error the distinctiveness of the barrens vegetation. bars indicate +. 1 standard error of the mean. Plant traits linked with drought tolerance are found abundantly in the Pocono till barrens, as tion to the apparent paradox of vegetation re- is the case in certain other reliably moist habitats sembling that of arid regions living on moist worldwide (e.g., Jackson 1968; Gimingham soils in a humid climate by proposing a gener- 1972; Darnrnan 1975; Kellman 1979; Streng and alized stress toleration syndrome. Plants resem- Harcombe 1982; Meades 1983; Read 1984; Ash bling xerophytes are common in situations 1988; Unwin 1989; Weetman et al. 1990; Gel- where soils are inherently low in some essential denhuys 1994). Grime (1977) offered a resolu- mineral nutrient or even where water is supera- 342 BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB [VOL.123 bundant, causing oxygen deficit in the rooting with moist soils. Lightning may have ignited zone and other stresses. So far no such inherent some fires, but humans were a more likely soil quality has been found that might explain source. Radiocarbon dates verify human occu- the presence of the mesic barrens on the Pocono pation more than 10,000 yr ago within 18 km of Plateau. Here and in other mesic barrens, the key the southern Plateau (McNett 1986). Native may lie in the broad overlap between tolerance Americans were managing vegetation by burn- of soil-based stresses and tolerance of fire. What ing in late prehistoric and early historic times in may have arisen as adaptations to soil factors many parts of eastern North America (Day may function in some habitats as "pyric" ad- 1953; Myers and Peroni 1983; Patterson and aptations (Jones 197 1; Chapin 1991; Chapin et Sassaman 1988; Denevan 1992). Several pollen al. 1993; Christensen 1993). stratigraphy studies at barrens in eastern North America show a relatively abrupt accession of POSSIBLEORIGINOF THE POCONOTILLBARRENS charcoal and barrens species' pollen (Lewis FLORA.Age of the Barrens. Two lines of cir- 1976; Laing 1994), consistent with the cultural cumstant$al evidence suggest that the barrens are spread of the use of fire to improve hunting or more than a few hundred years old. One is the to foster food-producing wild plants such as presence of a large concentration of rare species blueberries. and disjunct populations. The other consists of accounts written before the European settlement MAINTENANCEOF THE POCONOTLL BARRENS of the Plateau remarking on the barrens' prom- FLORA.The Role of Topography. The apparent inence. relationship between Illinoian glacial till and the No one has yet investigated fossil pollen stra- barrens vegetation may not be causal. The bar- tigraphy in the vicinity of the barrens. However, rens and the large Illinoian till deposits both may a palynological study has been completed at a be on the southern Pocono Plateau in part be- flat, shrub-dominated portion of the Shawan- cause the site is so flat. Between the terminal gunk Mountains, New York (McIntosh 1959), moraine and the escarpment is a series of large, the ecosystem floristically most similar to the nearly flat areas including the largest in the Pocono till barrens (M. Anderson, The Nature northeastern quarter of Pennsylvania (based on Conservancy, Conservation Science Depart- areas devoid of 30-m contour lines on the U.S. ment, Eastern Region, pers. comm.). A 9000-yr Geological Survey's 1:250,000-scale topograph- chronology at Shawangunk Spruce Swamp plac- ic maps)-an area approximately 12 X 7 km es the origin of the nearby barrens at approxi- surrounding Long Pond. The low gradient would mately 2000 yr ago, marked by charcoal peaks, have resulted in low rates of erosion, preserving abrupt expansion of Ericaceae and Viburnum the older till. The flat areas and the adjoining (presumably V. cassinoides), more gradual ex- summit of the steep, southward-facing escarp- pansion of Pinus rigida and Betula populifolia, ment provide conditions that are especially con- with charcoal and barrens species' pollen values ducive to the spread of fire. Spot fires on the remaining high to the present (Laing 1994). escarpment face are likely to spread quickly up- slope. Persistent winds blowing uninterrupted Origin of the Disturbance Regime. The across the plains at the top are likely to fan ig- southern Pocono Plateau is the only place in nition points into wildfires covering large areas. Pennsylvania documented as having had large This model is consistent with the virtual absence expanses of scrub oak prior to European settle- of barrens on the north side of Tunkhannock ment (Cook 1887). Scrub oak's local beachhead Creek and its broad wetland corridor (a barrier was most likely on the shallow, sandy soils to the spread of fire), despite the prevalence of along the sandstone ridge defining the Pocono Illinoian till there (Figs. 2 and 3). The largest Plateau escarpment, where the benefits of its ad- barrens area north of the Tunkhannock is adja- aptations to the habitat's harsh stresses- cent to a reach flowing through a narrow ravine, drought, low-nutrient conditions and frequent without the broad, virtually fire-immune wetland fire--outweigh the presumed costs of maintain- corridor which is characteristic of most of the ing these traits, such as an inherently slow stream's length. aboveground growth rate (Bloom et al. 1985). The high flammability of scrub oak and associ- Are Plants Driving the Maintenance ofAl- ated ericaceous shrubs may have allowed the ternative Vegetation States? Biotic factors may area affected by frequent fire to advance grad- be more important than abiotic factors in sus- ually farther from the Plateau's rim into areas taining the dichotomy in vegetation on the 19961 LATHAM ET AL.: SHRUB SAVANNAS OF THE POCONO PLATEAU 343 southern Pocono Plateau. Successional pathways vailing scrub oak barrens may be due, in part, may diverge autogenically, driven by positive to the "frost-pocket" phenomenon (Hough feedbacks between plants and their abiotic en- 1945; Clarke 1946; Schlegel and Butch 1980). vironment (Vitousek 1982; DeAngelis et al. In these shrub-dominated depressions, invasion 1986; Roberts 1987; Perry et al. 1989; Hobbie by forest trees is inhibited even in the absence 1992; Wilson and Agnew 1992). Members of of fire. A frost pocket starts with wildfire or lum- some of the dominant plant species in both bar- bering removing the tree canopy. Heat absorbed rens and forest may be altering soil organic mat- by the ground during the day is re-emitted at ter dynamics, nitrogen cycling, wildfire and mi- night as infrared radiation, which escapes into croclimate in ways that favor the persistence of space unless it is reflected back by tree canopies the incumbent species and inhibit invasion by or clouds. With only a shrub cover, radiative members of the alternative assemblage. Thus, cooling at the ground surface is unimpeded on the different dominant species in each vegetation clear nights. Swales and saddles-often so sub- category may regulate the factors that in turn tle that they are imperceptible without a topo- determine species composition. graphic map-act as conduits for cool air drain- Nitrogen availability sometimes increases im- age. The result is unseasonable frost, which oc- mediately after a fire, but it decreases with re- curs in June, July and August during most years peated fires due to a shift toward dominance by in Pocono barrens frost pockets (D. Miller, Pa. fire-tolerant plant species (Vitousek 1982; Ojima Bur. Forestry Dist. 19, Stroudsburg, unpubl. et al. 1994). Such plants have a generalized data). Tree seedlings, scrub oak and other non- stress-tolerance syndrome including high nitro- ericaceous shrubs are killed or stunted, either by gen-use efficiency and low foliar nitrogen con- freezing, increased susceptibility to insect her- centrations. Sclerophylly (having thickened, tan- bivory (Aizen and Patterson 1993), soil changes nin-rich, lignin-hardened foliage resistant to wa- -induced by ericaceous shrubs and associated ter loss) gives rise to recalcitrant (decay-resistant) mycorrhizal fungi (Read 1984; Leake 1992), or litter with high carbon:nitrogen and 1ignin:nitro- a combination of these processes. Our observa- gen ratios and slow rates of nitrogen release. By tions over several years indicate that Kalmia an- thus restricting nitrogen availability, stress-tol- gustifolia, Rhododendron canadense and the low erant plants where they are abundant can inhibit Vaccinium spp. are resistant, and Quercus ilici- invasion by taller, faster-growing species which folia and the seedlings of Acer rubrum and most tend to have lower maximum nitrogen-use effi- other hardwoods are susceptible. A 4-ha heath ciencies. As a separate issue from fire tolerance, barren near Long Pond with low, tundra-like some stress-adaptive traits coincidentally confer vegetation has persisted for over 40 years with- higher flammability, for example, volatile, oily out fire or other disturbance (1938-1939 aerial or resinous anti-herbivore secondary compounds photographs; D. Miller, Pa. Bur. Forestry Dist. and sclerophylly, which induces slow litter de- 19, Stroudsburg, pers. comm.). composition rates resulting in high fuel loads The rhodora barrens may owe their existence (Rundel 1981). (The common shrubs of the partly to frost pockets but their position on the southern Pocono Plateau barrens are so flam- wetter parts of the landscape and their highest mable that local firefighters and other residents rank in species diversity among the barrens call one or more species "kerosene bush.") Giv- types leads us to conjecture that they may also en a reliable ignition source (e.g., humans), sites be an ecotone between scrub oak barrens and with greater proportions of plants with such swamp forest, with species from both commu- traits will have larger, more frequent and more nities. Similarly, mixed deciduous forest is high- intense fires. A positive feedback may result: est in species diversity of all six vegetation types each incremental change decreases the success we studied most likely because it is a succes- of competitors (nitrogen-demanding, fire-sensi- sional community with species from both bar- tive species) and increases the likelihood that the rens and forests, where forest trees, mainly Acer stress tolerators will persist and spread, which in rubrum, are invading barrens in the prolonged turn increases the magnitude of the change, and absence of fire. so on. Thus, the decrease in nitrogen availability A common feature of the mesic barrens is an with repeated fires may be sustained autogeni- abrupt transition along the perimeter of a barrens cally (Vitousek 1982; Ojima et al. 1994). patch to fully developed forest vegetation. Au- The existence of heath barrens and rhodora togenic processes originating with the plants barrens as vegetation types distinct from the pre- themselves provide a more plausible explanation 344 BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB [VOL.123 for the sharp boundaries than abiotic constraints alluvium and appear mesic to wet based on spe- such as soil moisture gradients, which should cies composition. The North Fork Mountain, generally result in more gradual transitions (Wil- West , barrens total less than 100 ha, a son and Agnew 1992). small fraction of which is mesic barrens (Har- mon 1981). The area of the Shawangunk Moun- CONCLUSIONS.Plants growing in fire-prone tain, New York, barrens is approximately 2850 habitats often closely resemble or are the same ha, of which an estimated 16 ha are mesic or species as plants living in drought-prone, oli- wet (unpubl. GIs data). Thus, the Pocono till gotrophic or waterlogged habitats. Because barrens probably comprise more than 90% of the many stress-tolerance traits or their byproducts known global extent of a rare vegetation type also happen to enhance flammability, fire-prone apparently endemic to moist montane sites in vegetation on mesic or wet sites may violate the eastern North America. assumed direct relationship between moisture The mesic to wet barrens vegetation, often availability and fire activity, in which fire fre- dominated by Rhododendron canadense, is the quency peaks in moderately dry environments foundation and framework of a globally rare nat- and declines steadily across increasingly wet (or ural community. It has the highest plant species dry) habitats (e.g., Huston 1994). richness among the local barrens types and it Research is currently underway to test under- includes the highest density of the globally rare lying assumptions and some predictions arising plant Carex polymorpha, whose Pocono Plateau from the following scenario. Scrub oak may be population is one of the largest in the entire spe- the principal fire carrier in the Pocono till bar- cies' range (Rawinski and Sneddon 1991). To rens system, chiefly responsible for the persis- the degree that protection and management for tence of the other fire-maintained populations. biodiversity are based on the ranking of vege- Scrub oak and other fire-tolerant (but highly tation types, the mesic barrens are worthy of the flammable) shrubs may have established a foot- highest level of priority. However, the mesic hold along the Pocono Plateau's rim where barrens may well depend on the proximity of sandy soils weathered from sandstones and con- more xeric barrens as a vector of wildfire and of glomerates are kept shallow by wind and ero- wetlands as a source of species. Because of the sion. Such ridgetop barrens may be prone to probable interdependence among vegetation lightning fires and during droughts fires would patch types and the large cluster of rare species have spread away from the escarpment across inhabiting both the barrens and nearby wetlands, the top of the Plateau and into vegetation grow- an integrated, landscape-scale approach must ing on the finer, wetter soils of the Illinoian till guide conservation efforts at this important site. plains and Wisconsinan terminal moraine. Se- vere burns during droughts would have killed Literature Cited forest trees, allowing fire-tolerant barrens shrubs to spread. Once established, the mesic barrens ABRAMS,M. D. AND D. A. ORWIG.1995. Structure, radial growth dynamics and recent climatic varia- may be self-sustaining, owing to feedbacks be- tions of a 320-year-old Pinus rigida rock outcrop tween the dominant shrub species and fire, soil community. Oecologia 101: 353-360. nutrient availability, and microclimate. AIZEN,M. A. AND W. A. PATTERSONIII. 1993. Leaf phenology and herbivory along a topographically Implications for Conservation. "Alterna- determined temperature gradient: A spatial test of tive stable state" models such as the one we the phenological window hypothesis. Draft manu- propose here hold that certain perturbations can script. Department of Forestry and Wildlife Man- agement, University of , Amherst. shift a given site from one relatively stable spe- ANDERSON,L. E., H. A. CRUMAND W. R. BUCK.1990. cies composition to another (Sutherland 1990). List of the mosses of North America north of Mex- The mesic barrens have been shrinking over the ico. Bryologist 93: 448-499. last 40 to 60 years. Heath, scrub and savanna ANONYMOUS.1898. Hurts the berry men. 6 May edi- landscapes-harboring many rare and endan- tion, Stroudsburg Daily Times, Stroudsburg, PA. ASH,J. 1988. The location and stability of rainforest gered species-appear to be shifting to a wood- boundaries in north-eastern Queensland, Australia. land landscape dominated by common species. J. Biogeogr. 15: 619-630. We hypothesize that the mesic barrens' decline BEAUCHAMP,W. M. (ed.). 1923. Journal of a botanical is a state transition in progress, resulting mainly excursion in the northeastern parts of the states of Pennsylvania and New York during the year 1807, from fire suppression. by Frederick Pursh. Dehler Press, Syracuse, NY. The southern Pocono Plateau has 4150 ha of BERG,T. M., J. H. BARNES,W. D. SEVON,V. W. SKEMA, extant barrens, of which 2310 ha overlie till and J. WILSHUSENAND D. S. YANNACCI.1989. PhyS- iographic provinces of Pennsylvania. Map 13. vey files, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Re- Commission, Harrisburg, PA 17108-1026. sources, Topographic and Geologic Survey, Harris- DAILEY,I? W., JR. 1971. Climate of Pennsylvania. Cli- burg. matography of the United States No. 60-36. Na- BERG,T M., W. D. SEVONAND M. E BUCEK.1977. tional Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Geology and mineral resources of the Pocono Pines Environmental Data Service, Silver Spring, MD. and Mount Pocono quadrangles, Monroe County, DAMMAN,A. W. H. 1975. Permanent changes in the Pennsylvania. Atlas 204cd. Pennsylvania Depart- chronosequence of a boreal forest habitat induced ment of Environmental Resources, Topographic by natural disturbances, pp. 449-515. In: W. and Geologic Survey, Harrisburg. Schmidt [ed.], Sukessionsforschung. Cramer, Van- BERNARD,J. M. AND E K. SEISCHAB.1995. Pitch pine duz, Germany. (Pinus rigida Mill.) communities in northeastern DRVIS,A. E, G. J. EDINGER,S. B. ~DERSEN,A. M. New York state. Am. Midland Na. 134: 294-306. WILKINSONAND J. R. BELFONTI.1991. Natural ar- BLOOM,A. J., E S. CHAPIN,111. AND H. A. MOONEY. eas inventory of Monroe County, Pennsylvania. 1985. Resource limitation in plants-An economic Pennsylvania Science Office, The Nature Conser- analogy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 363-392. vancy, Middletown, PA, for Monroe County Plan- BRAUN,D. D. 1989. A revised Pleistocene glaciation ning Commission, Stroudsburg, PA. sequence in eastern Pennsylvania: Support for lim- DAVIS,W. W. H. 1876. The history of Bucks County, ited early Wisconsin ice and a single late Illinoian Pennsylvania, from the discovery of the Delaware advance beyond the late Wisconsin border. Inter- to the present time. Doylestown Democrat, Doy- national Geological Congress (28th, Washington, lestown, PA. DC., July 1989): 196-197. DAY,G. M. 1953. The Indian as an ecological factor BRAUN,E. L. 1950. Deciduous forests of eastern in the northeastern forest. Ecology 34: 329-346. North America. Hafner, New York. DEANGELIS,D. L., W. M. POSTAND C. C. TRAVIS. BURNHAM,C. E, M. J. FERREEAND E E. CUNNINGHAM. 1986. Positive feedback in natural systems. Spring- 1947. The scrub oak forests of the anthracite re- er-Verlag, Berlin. gion. U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Philadelphia. DENEVAN,W. M. 1992. The pristine myth: The land- scape of the Americas in 1492. Ann. Assn. Am. CARBYN,S. E. AND I? M. CATLING.1995. Vascular flora of sand barrens in the middle Ottawa Valley. Geogr. 82: 369-385. Canadian Field-Naturalist 109: 242-250. DIEFFENBACHER-KRALL,A. C. 1996. Paleo- and his- CHAPIN,E S., In. 1991. Effects of multiple environ- torical-ecology of the Cutler Grasslands, Cutler, (USA): Implications for future management. mental stresses on nutrient availability and use, pp. Natural Areas Journal 16: 3-13. 67-88. In: H. A. Mooney, W. E. Winner, E. J. Pel1 DIRIG,R. 1994. Lichens of pine barrens, dwarf pine and E. Chu reds.], Responses of plants to multiple plains, and "ice cave" habitats in the Shawangunk stresses. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. Mountains, New York. Mycotaxon 52: 523-558. , K. AUTUMNAND E PUGNAIRE.1993. Evolu- FISHER,G., R. MAT~ERN,R. MCCOMBS,J. NORGREN tion of suites of traits in response to environmental AND A. REBERT.1962. Soil survey of Carbon stress. Am. Nat. 142: S78-S92. County, Pennsylvania. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation CHRISTENSEN,N. L. 1993. Fire regimes and ecosystem Service, Washington, DC. dynamics, pp. 233-244. In: I?J. Crutzen and J. G. GELDENHUYS,C. J. 1994. Bergwind fires and the lo- Goldhammer [eds.], Fie in the environment: The cation pattern of forest patches in the southern cape ecological, atmospheric, and climatic importance of landscape, South-Africa. J. Biogeogr. 21: 49-62. vegetation fires. John Wiley & Sons, New York. GIMINGHAM,C. H. 1972. Ecology of heathlands. CLARKE,W. S., JR. 1946. Effect of low temperatures Chapman and Hall, London. on the vegetation of the Barrens in central Penn- GLEASON,H. A. AND A. CRONQUIST.1991. Manual of sylvania. Ecology 27: 188-189. vascular plants of northeastern United States and COOK,E 1887. Journals of the military expedition of adjacent Canada, 2nd ed. New York Botanical Gar- Major General John Sullivan against the Six den, New York. Nations of Indians in 1779. Auburn, New York. GRIME,J. I? 1977. Evidence for the existence of three CROWL,G. H. 1980. Woodfordian age of the Wiscon- primary strategies in plants and its relevance to sin glacial border in northeastern Pennsylvania. Ge- ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111 : ology 8: 51-55. 1169-1 194. AND W. D. SEVON.1980. Glacial border de- HAINES,D. A,, W. A. MAINAND E. E MCNAMARA. posits of late Wisconsinan age in northeastern 1978. Forest fires in Pennsylvania. U.S.D.A. Forest Pennsylvania. General Geology Report 7 1. Penn- Service Research Paper NC-158, North Central sylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN. Topographic and Geologic Survey, Harrisburg. HARMON,I? J. 1981. The vascular flora of the ridge CRUM,H. A. AND L. E. ANDERSON.1981. Mosses of top of North Fork Mountain, Grant and Pendleton eastern North America. 2 vols. Columbia Univer- Counties, West Virginia. Master's Thesis. Southern sity Press, New York. Illinois University, Carbondale. CRUSE,M. E., J. B. CRUSEAND C. S. WEED. 1989. A HEIKENS,A. L., K. A. WEST AND I? A. ROBERTSON. cultural resources survey of the proposed Trans- 1994. Short-term response of chert and shale bar- continental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Leidy nat- rens vegetation to fire in southwestern Illinois. Cas- ural gas pipeline Tobyhanna Creek crossing rerou- tanea 59: 274-285. te. EMANCO Inc., Houston, TX. Unpubl. report HOBBIE,S. E. 1992. Effects of plant species on nutri- (43 pp.) in Pennsylvania Archaeological Site Sur- ent cycling. TREE 7: 336-339. 346 BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB [VOL. 123

HOMOYA,M. A. 1994. Barrens as an ecological term: Delaware valley of Pennsylvania. Academic Press, An overview of usage in the scientific literature, Orlando, FL. pp. 295-303. In: J. S. Fralish, R. C. Anderson, J. MCQUILKIN,W. E. 1961. Scrub oak conversion, pp. E. Ebinger and R. Szafoni [eds.], Living in the 1-16. In: Forest and water research project, Dela- Edge: Proceedings of the North American Confer- ware-Lehigh Experimental Forest report no. 4. ence on Savannas and Barrens, Illinois State Uni- Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters, versity, Normal, IL Oct 15-16. Harrisburg. HOUGH,A. E 1945. Frost pocket and other microcli- MEADES,W. J. 1983. Heathlands, pp. 267-318. In: G. mates in forests of the northern Allegheny Plateau. R. South [ed.], Biogeography and ecology of the Ecology 26: 235-250. island of Newfoundland. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, HUSTON,M. A. 1994. Biological diversity: The co- The Hague. existence of species on changing landscapes. Cam- MYERS,R. L. AND P. A. PEROM.1983. Approaches to bridge University Press, Cambridge, England. determining aboriginal fire use and its impact on JACKSON,W. D. 1968. Fire, air, water and earth-An vegetation. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 64: 217-218. elemental ecology of Tasmania. Proc. Ecol. Soc. OJIMA,D. S., D. S. SCHIMEL,W. J. PARTONAND C. E. Aust. 3: 9-16. OWENSBY.1994. Long- and short-term effects of JONES,H. E. 1971. Comparative studies of plant fire on nitrogen cycling in tallgrass prairie. Biogeo- growth and distribution in relation to waterlogging. chemistry 24: 67-84. 11. An experimental study of the relationship be- OWENBY,J. R. AND D. S. EZELL. 1992. Monthly sta- tween transpiration and the uptake of iron in Erica tion normals of temperature, precipitation, and cinerea L. and E. tetralix L. J. Ecol. 59: 167-178. heating and cooling degree days 1961-90: Penn- KEENER,C. S. 1971. The natural history of the mid- sylvania. Climatography of the United States No. Appalachian shale barren flora, pp. 215-248. In: P. 8 1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra- C. Holt [ed.], The distributional history of the biota tion, National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, NC. of the southern Appalachians. Part 11. Flora. Vir- PATTERSON,W. A., I11 AND K. E. SASSAMAN.1988. ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Indian fires in the prehistory of New England, pp. Blacksburg. 107-135. In: Nicholas, G. P. [ed.], Holocene human KELLMAN,M. 1979. Soil enrichment by neotropical ecology in northeastern North America. Plenum savanna trees. J. Ecol. 67: 565-577. Publishing Corp. KUCHLER,A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of PERAZIO,P. A. 1991. A phase I cultural resource in- the conterminous United States. American Geo- vestigation of the planned Coolbaugh Township , graphical Society, New York. wastewater treatment facility, Coolbaugh Town- LAING,C. 1994. Vegetation and fire history of the ship, Monroe County, Pennsylvania. Kittatinny Ar- dwarf pine ridges, Shawangunk Mountains, New - chaeological Research, Inc., Stroudsburg, PA. Un- York. Unpubl. report (32 pp.), The Nature Conser- publ. report (28 pp.) in Pennsylvania Archaeolog- vancy, New York Regional Office, 91 Broadway, ical Site Survey files, Pennsylvania Historical and Albany, NY 12204. Museum Commission, Harrisburg, PA 17 108-1026. LATHAM,R. E. 1993. The serpentine barrens of tem- PERRY,D. A., M. P. AMARANTHUS,J. G. BORCHERS,S. perate eastern North America: Critical issues in the L. BORCHERSAND R. E. BRAINED. 1989. Boot- management of rare species and communities. Bar- strapping in ecosystems. BioScience 39: 230-237. tonia 57 Suppl.: 61-74 (Proceedings of the sym- PLAIT, R. B. 1951. An ecological study of the mid- posium on rare plants of Pennsylvania and adjacent Appalachian shale barrens and the plants endemic states, 28 March 1991, Philadelphia). to them. Ecol. Monogr. 21: 269-300. LEAKE,J. R. 1992. The role of ericoid mycorrhizas in PORTER,T. C. 1859. Letter of 5 September 1859 to nitrogen nutrition and ecology of heathland eco- Asa Gray. T. C. Porter letters, Historic Letters File, systems, pp. 227-236. In: D. J. Read, D. H. Lewis, Archives, Library of the Gray Herbarium, Harvard A. H. Fitter and I. J. Alexander [eds.], Mycorrhizas University, Cambridge, MA. in ecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, PYLE,E. C. 1942a. Letter of 26 February 1942 to G. UK. H. Wirt. Files, Pa. Bur. Forestry Dist. 19, Strouds- LEWIS, D. M. 1976. The past vegetation of the Pine burg. Bush, pp. 81-90. In: D. Rittner [ed.], Pine Bush. . 1942b. Letter of 20 April 1942 to Monroe Pine Bush Historic Preservation Society, Albany, County forest fire wardens. Files, Pa. Bur. Forestry NY. Dist. 19, Stroudsburg. LIPSCOMB,G. H. 1981. Soil survey of Monroe County, RAWSKI, T. J. AND L. A. SNEDDON.1991. Element Pennsylvania. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, stewardship abstract: Carex polymorpha. Biologi- Washington, DC. cal Conservation Database. The Nature Conservan- MAGURRAN,A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its cy, Arlington, VA. measurement. Princeton University Press, Prince- READ, D. J. 1984. Interactions between ericaceous ton, NJ. plants and their competitors with special reference MATHEWS,A. 1886. History of Wayne, Pike and Mon- to soil toxicity. Aspects of Applied Biology 5: 195- roe Counties, Pennsylvania. R. T. Peck, Philadel- 209. phia. REED, l? B., JR. 1988. National list of plant species MCINTOSH,R. P. 1959. Presence and cover in pitch that occur in wetlands: Northeast (Region 1). Bio- pine-oak stands of the Shawangunk Mountains, logical Report 88 (26.1). U.S. Department of the New York. Ecology 40: 482-485. Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, MCNEIT, C. W., JR. [ed.]. 1986. Shawnee Minisink: DC. A stratified Paleoindian-Archaic site in the upper REICH,P. B. AND T. M. HINCKLEY.1980. Water rela- 19961 LATHAM ET AL.: SHRUB SAVANNAS OF THE POCONO PLATEAU 347

tions, soil fertility, and plant nutrient composition THOMPSON,J. E. 1995. Interrelationships among veg- of a pygmy oak ecosystem. Ecology 61: 400-416. etation dynamics, fire, surficial geology, and topog- RESCHKE,C. 1990. Ecological communities of New raphy of the southern Pocono Plateau, Monroe York State. Natural Heritage Program, New York County, Pennsylvania. Master's Thesis. University Department of Environmental Conservation, La- of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. tham, NY. THWAITES,R. G. 1906. Early Western Travels, 1748- RHOADS,A. E AND W. M. KLEIN, JR. 1993. The vas- 1846, Vol. XXII: Part I of Maximilian, Prince of cular flora of Pennsylvania: annotated checklist and Wied's, Travels in the Interior of North America, atlas. American Philosophical Society, Philadel- 1832-1834. Arthur H. Clark Co., Cleveland, OH. phia. TITUS,B. D., S. S. SIDHUAND A. U. MALLIK.1995. A ROBERTS,D. W. 1987. A dynamical systems perspec- summary of some studies on Kalmia angustifolia tive on vegetation theory. Vegetatio 69: 27-33. L.: A problem species in Newfoundland forestry. ROWLAND,H. B. 1957. Letter of 8 June 1957 to A. Information Report N-X-296. Canadian Forest Ser- B. Moyer. Files, Pa. Bur. Forestry Dist. 19, Strouds- vice-Newfoundland and Labrador Region, St. burg. John's, Newfoundland, Canada. RUNDEL,P. W. 1981. Structural and chemical com- TYNDALL,R. W. 1994. Conifer clearing and prescribed ponents of flammability, pp. 183-207. In: H. A. burning effects to herbaceous layer vegetation on a Mooney, T. M. Bonnicksen, N. L. Christensen, J. serpentine "barren." Castanea 59: 255- E. Lotan and W. A. Reiners [eds.], Fire regimes and 273. ecosystem properties (proceedings of the confer- UNWIN,G. L. 1989. Structure and composition of the ence, Honolulu, December 1978). U.S.D.A. Forest abrupt rainforest boundary in the Heberton High- Service Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-26. land, north Queensland. Aust. J. Bot. 37: 413-428. AND SCHLEGEL,J. AND G. BUTCH.1980. The Barrens: Cen- VICKERY,P. D., M. L. HUNTER S. M. MELVIN. tral Pennsylvania's year-round deep freeze. Bull. 1994. Effects of habitat area on the distribution of Am. Meteorological Soc. 61: 1368-1373. grassland birds in Maine. Conservation Biology 8: SEVON,W. D. 1975a. Geology and mineral resources 1087-1097. of the Christmans and Pohopoco Mountain quad- VITOUSEK,P. M. 1982. Nutrient cycling and nutrient rangles, Carbon and Monroe Counties, Pennsylva- use efficiency. Am. Nat. 119: 553-572. WALKER,R. B. 1954. Factors affecting plant growth nia. Atlas 195ab. Pennsylvania Department of En- on serpentine soils. Ecology 35: 259-266. vironmental Resources, Topographic and Geologic WARTENBERG,D., S. FERSONAND E J. ROHLF. 1987. Survey, Hamsburg. Putting things in order: A critique of detrended cor- . 1975b. Geology and mineral resources of the respondence analysis. Am. Nat. 129: 434-448. Hickory Run and Blakeslee quadrangles, Carbon WEETMAN,G. E, R. FOURNIER,E. SCHNORBUSPANOZZO and Monroe Counties, Pennsylvania. Atlas 194cd. AND J. BARKER. 1990. Post-bum nitrogen and Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Re- phosphorus availability of deep humus soils in sources, Topographic and Geologic Survey, Harris- coastal British Columbia cedar/hemlock forests and burg. the use of fertilization and salal eradication to re- SMITH,T. L. 1991. Natural ecological communities of store productivity, pp. 451-499. In: S. P. Gessel, Pennsylvania (first revision). Unpubl. report (1 11 D. S. Lacate, G. E Weetman and R. E Powers pp.), The Nature Conservancy, Pennsylvania Sci- [eds.], Sustained productivity of forest soils (pro- ence Office, 34 Airport Road, Middletown, PA ceedings of the 7th North American Forest Soils 17057. Conference). Faculty of Forestry, University of SOKAL,R. R. AND E J. ROHLF. 1995. Biometry (3rd British Columbia, Vancouver. edition). Freeman, San Francisco, CA. WHEELER,A. G. 1991. Plant bugs of Quercus ilicifol- STRENG,D. R. AND P. A. HARCOMBE.1982. Why don't ia: myriads of minds (Heteroptera) in pitch pine- east Texas savannas grow up to forest?. Am. Mid- scrub oak barrens. J. New York Ent. Soc. 99: 405- land Nat. 108: 278-294. 440. SUTHERLAND,J. P. 1990. Perturbations, resistance, and WILSON,J. B. AND A. D. Q. AGNEW.1992. Positive- alternative views of the existence of multiple stable feedback switches in plant communities. Adv. Ecol. points in nature. Am. Nat. 136: 270-275. Res. 23: 263-336. TABER,T. T., 111. 1970. Ghost lumber towns of central WIRT, G. H. 1944. Letter of 25 August 1944 to W. P. Pennsylvania. W. C. Casler, B. E G. Kline, Jr. and Starkey. Files, Pa. Bur. Forestry Dist. 19, Strouds- T. T. Taber 111, Muncy, PA. burg. 348 BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB [VOL. 123

Appendix: List of plant species found in the Pocono till barrens. Listed species were found at more than one site or they are widespread in at least one site. Plants seen only on trails or other artificially disturbed areas are excluded. Superscripts preceding plant names indicate frequency on the 60 barrens census plots: I, 275%; 2, 50-74%; 3, 25-49%, 4, 5-24%; no superscript, <5% or found elsewhere besides census plots. Voucher spec- imens are in the herbmum of the Morris Arboretum, University of Pennsylvania, for species marked with an asterisk. Species were identified by Roger Latham and Ann Rhoads (vascular plants) and Christine Manville (mosses). Nomenclature follows Rhoads and Klein (1993) for vascular plants, with synonyms from Gleason and Cronquist (1991) where the two sources differ, and Anderson, Cmm and Buck (1990) for mosses.

Vascular Plants ACERACEAE QENTIANACEAE Acer rubrum L. Bartonia virginica (L.) BSP* AQUIFOLIACEAE Gentiana linearis Froel.* Ilex montana (Ton: & A.Gray) A.Gray* HAMAMELACEAE ARALIACEAE Hamamelis virginiana L. Aralia hispida Vent.* JUNCACEAE Aralia nudicaulis L. Juncus jiliformis L.* Panax trifolius L. LAURACEAE ASTERACEAE Sassafras albidum (Nutt.) Nees Aster umbellatus F?Mill. LILIACEAE Erechtites hieraciifolia (L.) Raf. ex DC. Prenanthes trifoliolata (Cass.) Fern.* 'Amianthium muscaetoxicum (Walt.) A.Gray Solidago puberula Nutt.* Lilium philadelphicum L. Maianthemum canadense Desf. BETULACEAE Medeola virginiana L. Betula populifolia Marshall Trillium undulatum Willd. CAPRIFOLIACEAE ' Uvularia sessilifolia L. Viburnum cassinoides L. (syn. V. nudum L. var. LYCOPODIACEAE cassinoides [L.] Ton: & A.Gray) Diphasiastrum digitatum (A.Braun) Holub (syn. CORNACEAE Lycopodium digitatum Dillen.) 'Lycopodium hickeyi W.Wagner, Beitel & Cornus canadensis L. R.C.Moran* (syn. L. obscurzcm L. var. isophyllum Hickey) Carex pensylvanica Lam. Lycopodium obscurum L. Carex polymorpha Muhl.* LYGODIACEAE Carex stricta Lam.* Lygodium palmatum (Bernh.) Swartz* Carex vestita Willd.* Eleocharis tenuis (Willd.) Schultes MONOTROPACEAE DENNSTAEDTIACEAE Monotropa unz@ora L. Dennstaedtia punctilobula (Michx.) T.Moore MYRICACEAE Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn Comptonia peregrina (L.)Coult. ERICACEAE NYSSACEAE Chamaedaphne calyculata (L.) Moench. Nyssa sylvatica Marshall Epigaea repens L. ORCHIDACEAE Gaultheria procumbens L. Gaylussacia baccata (Wang.) K.Koch Cypripedium acaule Ait. Gaylussacia frondosa (L.) Ton: & A.Gray ex Tom Platanthera blephariglottis (Willd.) Lindl. (syn. Kalmia angustifolia L. Habenaria blephariglottis [Willd.] Hook.) Lyonia ligustrina (L.) DC. OSMUNDACEAE Rhododendron canadense (L.) Ton* Osmunda cinnamomea L. Vaccinium angustifolium Ait. Osmunda claytoniana L. Vaccinium corymbosum L. Vaccinium myrtilloides Michx. PINACEAE Vaccinium pallidum Ait. Larix laricina (DuRoi) K.Koch Vaccinium stamineum L. Picea rubens Sarg. FAGACEAE Pinus rigida PMill. Pinus strobus L. Quercus alba L. Tsuga canadensis (L.) Can: Quercus coccinea Muenchh. Quercus ilicifolia Wang. POACEAE Quercus palustris Muenchh. Brachyelytrum erectum (Schreb.) Beauv. Calamagrostis canadensis (Michx.) Beauv. Calamagrostis cinnoides (Muhl.) Bart.