DOCSLIB.ORG

An Innovative Solution to NASA's NEO Impact Threat Mitigation Grand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Innovative Solution to NASA's NEO Impact Threat Mitigation Grand Final Technical Report of a NIAC Phase 2 Study December 9, 2014 NASA Grant and Cooperative Agreement Number: NNX12AQ60G NIAC Phase 2 Study Period: 09/10/2012 – 09/09/2014 An Innovative Solution to NASA’s NEO Impact Threat Mitigation Grand Challenge and Flight Validation Mission Architecture Development PI: Dr. Bong Wie, Vance Coffman Endowed Chair Professor Asteroid Deflection Research Center Department of Aerospace Engineering Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 email: [email protected] (515) 294-3124 Co-I: Brent Barbee, Flight Dynamics Engineer Navigation and Mission Design Branch (Code 595) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD 20771 email: [email protected] (301) 286-1837 Graduate Research Assistants: Alan Pitz (M.S. 2012), Brian Kaplinger (Ph.D. 2013), Matt Hawkins (Ph.D. 2013), Tim Winkler (M.S. 2013), Pavithra Premaratne (M.S. 2014), Sam Wagner (Ph.D. 2014), George Vardaxis, Joshua Lyzhoft, and Ben Zimmerman NIAC Program Executive: Dr. John (Jay) Falker NIAC Program Manager: Jason Derleth NIAC Senior Science Advisor: Dr. Ronald Turner NIAC Strategic Partnerships Manager: Katherine Reilly Contents 1 Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle (HAIV) Mission Concept 2 1.1 Introduction ...................................... 2 1.2 Overview of the HAIV Mission Concept ....................... 6 1.3 Enabling Space Technologies for the HAIV Mission . 12 1.3.1 Two-Body HAIV Configuration Design Tradeoffs . 12 1.3.2 Terminal Guidance Sensors/Algorithms . 13 1.3.3 Thermal Protection and Shield Issues . 14 1.3.4 Nuclear Fuzing Mechanisms ......................... 15 2 Planetary Defense Flight Validation (PDFV) Mission Design 17 2.1 The Need for a PDFV Mission ............................ 17 2.2 Preliminary PDFV Mission Design by the MDL of NASA GSFC . 20 2.2.1 Overview ................................... 20 2.2.2 HAIV System and Mission Design ...................... 20 2.2.3 Terminal Guidance, Navigation, and Control Subsystem . 26 2.2.4 Future Work for HAIV Mission Design . 29 2.2.5 Summary ................................... 31 2.3 Target Selection for the PDFV Mission ........................ 31 2.3.1 Reference Targets of the Don Quijote Mission Study . 32 2.3.2 Target Selection Problem Formulation . 32 2.3.3 Direct Intercept PDFV Mission ....................... 35 2.4 Recommendations for Planetary Defense . 38 3 Terminal Intercept Guidance with Optical and Infrared Seekers 43 3.1 Introduction ...................................... 43 3.2 Optical Image Rendering . .............................. 49 3.2.1 3D Polyhedron Optical Model for an Irregularly Shaped Asteroid . 49 i 3.2.2 Camera Focal Plane ............................. 50 3.2.3 Lighting Conditions ............................. 52 3.2.4 Pixel Value Assignment ........................... 52 3.2.5 Line-of-Sight Vector ............................. 54 3.3 Terminal Intercept Guidance with Optical Cameras . 54 3.4 IR Telescope/Seeker Characterization ........................ 55 3.4.1 IR Telescope/Seeker ............................. 55 3.4.2 Classical Cassegrain Telescope Optics . 55 3.4.3 Signal-to-Noise Ratio ............................ 61 3.4.4 NEOWISE IR Telescope ........................... 65 3.4.5 HAIV IR Telescope .............................. 65 3.5 Terminal Intercept Guidance with an IR Seeker . 67 4 Hypervelocity Kinetic Impact and Nuclear Subsurface Explosion: Modeling and Sim­ ulation 70 4.1 Introduction ...................................... 70 4.2 GPU-based ASPH Hydrocode Development ..................... 71 4.2.1 Adaptive Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (ASPH) Method . 72 4.2.2 Tensor Damage Model ............................ 74 4.2.3 Neighbor Finding Implementation ...................... 75 4.2.4 Grid Generation ............................... 75 4.3 Energy-Coupling Models ............................... 77 4.3.1 Introduction .................................. 77 4.3.2 Energy Deposition Modeling ......................... 78 4.3.3 Tillotson Equation of State .......................... 80 4.3.4 Shock Equation of State ........................... 82 4.3.5 Jones-Wilkins-Lee (JWL) Equation of State . 82 4.4 GPU-based ASPH Hydrocode Simulations . 82 4.4.1 Disruption of an Asymmetric Asteroid Model . 84 4.4.2 Subsurface Explosion Sensitivity Analysis . 86 4.4.3 GPU-Accelerated Computations ....................... 89 4.5 Thermal Shield Analysis and Design ........................ 91 4.5.1 Thermal Analysis Procedure ......................... 91 4.5.2 Improved Thermal Analysis Procedure . 97 4.6 Whipple Shield Analysis and Design ......................... 98 ii 5 Suborbital Intercept and Disruption of NEOs 108 5.1 Introduction ......................................108 5.2 An Optimum Suborbital Intercept Problem and Its Solutions . 111 5.2.1 Problem Formulation .............................111 5.2.2 Intercept Trajectory Optimization ......................115 5.2.3 Suborbital Intercept Examples ........................115 5.2.4 Late Intercept Solutions ...........................118 5.3 Higher ΔV Interceptors . 119 5.4 Practical Issues and Future Research Work ......................121 5.4.1 Fragmentation and Airbursts .........................121 5.4.2 EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) Effects . 121 5.4.3 Launch Vehicle Mission Planning Issues . 122 5.4.4 Future Research Work ............................122 5.5 ATLAS (Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System) . 123 6 Close Proximity Dynamics and Control Around Asteroids 125 6.1 Introduction ......................................125 6.2 Gravitational Models of an Irregular-Shaped Asteroid . 128 6.2.1 Spacecraft’s Equation of Motion .......................128 6.2.2 Polyhedron Gravitational Model .......................128 6.2.3 Spherical Harmonics Expansion Model . 131 6.2.4 Inertia Dyadic Gravitational Model . 133 6.2.5 Comparison of Gravitational Models . 137 6.3 Close Proximity Dynamics and Fuel-Efficient Orbit Control . 138 6.3.1 Close Proximity Orbital Dynamics ......................138 6.3.2 Fuel-Efficient Close Proximity Orbit Control . 140 6.4 Summary .......................................148 iii List of Figures 1.1 A summary of the ideal deflection ΔV performance characteristics of nuclear standoff explosions [9]. ............................... 4 1.2 Initial conceptual illustration of a two-body hypervelocity asteroid intercept vehi­ cle (HAIV) system, which was proposed for a NIAC Phase 1 Study in 2011 [12]. 6 1.3 A notional depiction of the HAIV mission concept further investigated for a NIAC Phase 2 Study in 2012–2014. ............................ 7 1.4 HAIV configuration options [13]. .......................... 7 1.5 A reference HAIV flight system and its terminal guidance operational concept [13]. 8 1.6 A 70-m asymmetric asteroid model disrupted by a 10-km/s kinetic impact and a subsequent 70-kt nuclear subsurface explosion of the HAIV system [17–19]. 10 1.7 Illustration of the disruption modeling and simulation problem [23]. 10 1.8 A summary of orbital dispersion simulation study results for nuclear subsurface explosions [23, 24]. .................................. 11 2.1 The Deep Impact mission trajectory [25–27]. 18 2.2 An experimental HAIV flight system designed by the MDL of NASA GSFC [15]. 21 2.3 A reference HAIV launch configuration with Atlas V 401 [15]. 22 2.4 A reference PDFV mission trajectory for a target asteroid (2006 CL9) [15]. 24 2.5 HAIV flight validation mission timeline by the MDL of NASA GSFC [15]. 25 2.6 Block diagram of the Autonomous Navigation System (ANS) of an experimental HAIV [15]. ...................................... 27 2.7 Block diagram of the Attitude Control System (ACS) of an experimental HAIV [15]. 28 2.8 Monte Carlo simulation results for intercepting an ideal 100-m target asteroid using the B-plane targeting method [15]. .......................... 29 2.9 Typical orbits of Amor, Apollo, Aten, and Atira asteroids. 33 2.10 Illustration of the Earth-Sun-Asteroid line-of-sight communication angle excluded for the PDFV mission [28]. .............................. 35 iv 2.11 International efforts in preparing for a planetary defense mission. Image courtesy of Lindley Johnson at NASA/NEOO. ........................ 38 2.12 A summary of various mitigation options for planetary defense. 39 2.13 Applicability of the HAIV mission concept to various mission scenarios. 40 3.1 Two-dimensional geometry illustration of the terminal intercept guidance problem [35, 36]. ........................................ 44 3.2 Trajectories, line-of-sight angle, commanded acceleration, and applied accelera­ tion of the pulsed PN guidance law applied to an ideal asteroid intercept prob­ lem [35, 36]. ..................................... 46 3.3 Closing velocity, line-of-sight rate, ΔV usage, and position error of the pulsed PN guidance law applied to an ideal asteroid intercept problem [35, 36]. 46 3.4 A 3D model of asteroid 433 Eros generated using NEAR’s laser rangefinder mea­ surements (left) and the surface gravitational acceleration of Eros computed using its polyhedron shape model (right) [37]. ....................... 47 3.5 Comparison of an optical image (left) and an ideal fictive IR image (right) of a scaled Eros polyhedron shape model [38, 39]. 48 3.6 An illustration for comparing optical and infrared images of asteroids with differ­ ent sizes and albedos (Image courtesy of NASA/JPL). 48 3.7 A triangulated shape model of asteroid 433 Eros. 49 3.8 Geometry illustration for optical image rendering and triangulation of surface points. 50 3.9 Illustration of a parallel trim reduction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1986 DA and 1986 EB: IRON OBJECTS in NEAR-Eakm ORBITS; J.C
    LPSC XVIII 349 1986 DA AND 1986 EB: IRON OBJECTS IN NEAR-EAKm ORBITS; J.C. Gra- die, Planetary Geosciences Division, Hawaii Institute of Geophysics, University of Hawaii, Bonolalu, HI 96822 and E.F. Tede sco, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109. The estimated 1,500 asteroids, with diameters larger than a few hun- dred meters, which cross or closely approach the Earth' s orbit are divided into three orbital classes: the Aten asteroids with semi-maj or axes less than 1 AU and which cross the Earth's orbit near aphelia, the Apollo asteroids with semi-major axes greater than or equal to 1 AU and with per- ihelia greater than 1.17 AU, and the Amor asteroids with perihelia between 1.17 and 1.3 AU (1). These asteroids which have orbits stable against col- 8 lision with or ejection by a planet on the order of lo7 to 10 years must be derived from either extinct cometary naclei (2) or the asteroid belt (C f. 1). These near-Earth asteroids are important for several diverse reasons: they represent a group of obj ect s from which at least some of the meteor- ites arc derived, they may harbor extinct cometary nuclei thought to con- tain some of the most primitive and, perhaps, pristine material in the solar system, occasionally collide with the Earth, and are among the most accessible objects in the solar system. Study of the physical properties of the Earth-approaching asteroids is constrained by the generally long time between close approaches and poorly known orbits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact and Recovery of Asteroid 2008 TC3 P
    Vol 458 | 26 March 2009 | doi:10.1038/nature07920 LETTERS The impact and recovery of asteroid 2008 TC3 P. Jenniskens1, M. H. Shaddad2, D. Numan2, S. Elsir3, A. M. Kudoda2, M. E. Zolensky4,L.Le4,5, G. A. Robinson4,5, J. M. Friedrich6,7, D. Rumble8, A. Steele8, S. R. Chesley9, A. Fitzsimmons10, S. Duddy10, H. H. Hsieh10, G. Ramsay11, P. G. Brown12, W. N. Edwards12, E. Tagliaferri13, M. B. Boslough14, R. E. Spalding14, R. Dantowitz15, M. Kozubal15, P. Pravec16, J. Borovicka16, Z. Charvat17, J. Vaubaillon18, J. Kuiper19, J. Albers1, J. L. Bishop1, R. L. Mancinelli1, S. A. Sandford20, S. N. Milam20, M. Nuevo20 & S. P. Worden20 In the absence of a firm link between individual meteorites and magnitude H 5 30.9 6 0.1 (using a phase angle slope parameter their asteroidal parent bodies, asteroids are typically characterized G 5 0.15). This is a measure of the asteroid’s size. only by their light reflection properties, and grouped accordingly Eyewitnesses in Wadi Halfa and at Station 6 (a train station between into classes1–3. On 6 October 2008, a small asteroid was discovered Wadi Halfa and Al Khurtum, Sudan) in the Nubian Desert described a with a flat reflectance spectrum in the 554–995 nm wavelength rocket-like fireball with an abrupt ending. Sensors aboard US govern- range, and designated 2008 TC3 (refs 4–6). It subsequently hit the ment satellites first detected the bolide at 65 km altitude at Earth. Because it exploded at 37 km altitude, no macroscopic 02:45:40 UTC (ref. 8). The optical signal consisted of three peaks span- fragments were expected to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Using a Nuclear Explosive Device for Planetary Defense Against an Incoming Asteroid
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2019 Exoatmospheric Plowshares: Using a Nuclear Explosive Device for Planetary Defense Against an Incoming Asteroid David A. Koplow Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2197 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3229382 UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs, Spring 2019, Issue 1, 76. This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Air and Space Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, and the National Security Law Commons EXOATMOSPHERIC PLOWSHARES: USING A NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE DEVICE FOR PLANETARY DEFENSE AGAINST AN INCOMING ASTEROID DavidA. Koplow* "They shall bear their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks" Isaiah 2:4 ABSTRACT What should be done if we suddenly discover a large asteroid on a collision course with Earth? The consequences of an impact could be enormous-scientists believe thatsuch a strike 60 million years ago led to the extinction of the dinosaurs, and something ofsimilar magnitude could happen again. Although no such extraterrestrialthreat now looms on the horizon, astronomers concede that they cannot detect all the potentially hazardous * Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. The author gratefully acknowledges the valuable comments from the following experts, colleagues and friends who reviewed prior drafts of this manuscript: Hope M. Babcock, Michael R. Cannon, Pierce Corden, Thomas Graham, Jr., Henry R. Hertzfeld, Edward M.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting and Avoiding Killer Asteroids
    Target Earth! Detecting and Avoiding Killer Asteroids by Trudy E. Bell (Copyright 2013 Trudy E. Bell) ARTH HAD NO warning. When a mountain- above 2000°C and triggering earthquakes and volcanoes sized asteroid struck at tens of kilometers (miles) around the globe. per second, supersonic shock waves radiated Ocean water suctioned from the shoreline and geysered outward through the planet, shock-heating rocks kilometers up into the air; relentless tsunamis surged e inland. At ground zero, nearly half the asteroid’s kinetic energy instantly turned to heat, vaporizing the projectile and forming a mammoth impact crater within minutes. It also vaporized vast volumes of Earth’s sedimentary rocks, releasing huge amounts of carbon dioxide and sulfur di- oxide into the atmosphere, along with heavy dust from both celestial and terrestrial rock. High-altitude At least 300,000 asteroids larger than 30 meters revolve around the sun in orbits that cross Earth’s. Most are not yet discovered. One may have Earth’s name written on it. What are engineers doing to guard our planet from destruction? winds swiftly spread dust and gases worldwide, blackening skies from equator to poles. For months, profound darkness blanketed the planet and global temperatures dropped, followed by intense warming and torrents of acid rain. From single-celled ocean plank- ton to the land’s grandest trees, pho- tosynthesizing plants died. Herbivores starved to death, as did the carnivores that fed upon them. Within about three years—the time it took for the mingled rock dust from asteroid and Earth to fall out of the atmosphere onto the ground—70 percent of species and entire genera on Earth perished forever in a worldwide mass extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • (101955) Bennu from OSIRIS-Rex Imaging and Thermal Analysis
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0731-1 Properties of rubble-pile asteroid (101955) Bennu from OSIRIS-REx imaging and thermal analysis D. N. DellaGiustina 1,26*, J. P. Emery 2,26*, D. R. Golish1, B. Rozitis3, C. A. Bennett1, K. N. Burke 1, R.-L. Ballouz 1, K. J. Becker 1, P. R. Christensen4, C. Y. Drouet d’Aubigny1, V. E. Hamilton 5, D. C. Reuter6, B. Rizk 1, A. A. Simon6, E. Asphaug1, J. L. Bandfield 7, O. S. Barnouin 8, M. A. Barucci 9, E. B. Bierhaus10, R. P. Binzel11, W. F. Bottke5, N. E. Bowles12, H. Campins13, B. C. Clark7, B. E. Clark14, H. C. Connolly Jr. 15, M. G. Daly 16, J. de Leon 17, M. Delbo’18, J. D. P. Deshapriya9, C. M. Elder19, S. Fornasier9, C. W. Hergenrother1, E. S. Howell1, E. R. Jawin20, H. H. Kaplan5, T. R. Kareta 1, L. Le Corre 21, J.-Y. Li21, J. Licandro17, L. F. Lim6, P. Michel 18, J. Molaro21, M. C. Nolan 1, M. Pajola 22, M. Popescu 17, J. L. Rizos Garcia 17, A. Ryan18, S. R. Schwartz 1, N. Shultz1, M. A. Siegler21, P. H. Smith1, E. Tatsumi23, C. A. Thomas24, K. J. Walsh 5, C. W. V. Wolner1, X.-D. Zou21, D. S. Lauretta 1 and The OSIRIS-REx Team25 Establishing the abundance and physical properties of regolith and boulders on asteroids is crucial for understanding the for- mation and degradation mechanisms at work on their surfaces. Using images and thermal data from NASA’s Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, and Security-Regolith Explorer (OSIRIS-REx) spacecraft, we show that asteroid (101955) Bennu’s surface is globally rough, dense with boulders, and low in albedo.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Chat: Asteroid 1998 QE2 to Sail Past Earth Expert Dr. Bill Cooke May 30, 2013 ______
    NASA Chat: Asteroid 1998 QE2 to Sail Past Earth Expert Dr. Bill Cooke May 30, 2013 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Moderator_Brooke: Welcome everyone! We're just about to start the chat, so please go ahead and send in your questions. Thanks for being here -- now let's talk asteroids! RSEW: Hello Bill_Cooke: We're here! Do you have a question? Moderator_Brooke: All right, here we go...Bill, over to you. tyler_hussey : I was wondering if people in New Hampshire will be able to view this asteroid pass by, and if so, what is the length it will be visible, what direction, and how close to the horizon? Bill_Cooke; Hi Tyler. You need a telescope to see the QE2 asteroid, and of course, it needs to be dark. It's visible there in N.H. with a small telescope about 10:30 p.m. local time. It will be in the constellation Hydra and be about eleventh magnitude. tyler_hussey: I was wondering if people in New Hampshire will be able to view this asteroid pass by, and if so, what is the length it will be visible, what direction, and how close to the horizon? Bill_Cooke: Unless you are Asia or Europe, you will not be able to see the asteroid at close approach. However, you can see it tonight around 10:30 pm local time with a small telescope. It will be in the constellation of Hydra. Moderator_Brooke: You can also find more information about QE2 at this link: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/asteroids/news/asteroid20130530.html guest100: where did this asteroid come from Bill_Cooke: The asteroid 1998 QE2 is an amor asteroid which means it approaches Earth from the outside.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Process of Boulders on the Surface of Asteroid 25143 Itokawa— Fragments from Collisional Disruption
    Earth Planets Space, 60, 7–12, 2008 Impact process of boulders on the surface of asteroid 25143 Itokawa— fragments from collisional disruption A. M. Nakamura1, T. Michikami2, N. Hirata3, A. Fujiwara4, R. Nakamura5, M. Ishiguro6, H. Miyamoto7,8, H. Demura3, K. Hiraoka1, T. Honda1, C. Honda4, J. Saito9, T. Hashimoto4, and T. Kubota4 1Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan 2Fukushima National College of Technology, Iwaki, Fukushima 970-8034, Japan 3School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Aizu, Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima 965-8580, Japan 4Institute of Space and Astronautical Sciences (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan 5National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 306-8568, Japan 6Astronomy Department, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea 7The University Museum, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 8Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA 9School of Engineering, Tokai University, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan (Received November 3, 2006; Revised March 29, 2007; Accepted April 11, 2007; Online published February 12, 2008) The subkilometer-size asteroid 25143 Itokawa is considered to have a gravitationally bounded rubble-pile structure. Boulders appearing in high-resolution images retrieved by the Hayabusa mission revealed the genuine outcome of the collisional event involving the asteroid’s parent body. Here we report that the boulders’ shapes and structures are strikingly similar to laboratory rock impact fragments despite differences of orders of magnitude in scale and complexities of the physical processes. These similarities suggest the universal character of the process throughout the range of these scales, and the brittle and structurally continuous nature regarding the parent body of the boulders.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Cratering
    6 Impact cratering The dominant surface features of the Moon are approximately circular depressions, which may be designated by the general term craters … Solution of the origin of the lunar craters is fundamental to the unravel- ing of the history of the Moon and may shed much light on the history of the terrestrial planets as well. E. M. Shoemaker (1962) Impact craters are the dominant landform on the surface of the Moon, Mercury, and many satellites of the giant planets in the outer Solar System. The southern hemisphere of Mars is heavily affected by impact cratering. From a planetary perspective, the rarity or absence of impact craters on a planet’s surface is the exceptional state, one that needs further explanation, such as on the Earth, Io, or Europa. The process of impact cratering has touched every aspect of planetary evolution, from planetary accretion out of dust or planetesimals, to the course of biological evolution. The importance of impact cratering has been recognized only recently. E. M. Shoemaker (1928–1997), a geologist, was one of the irst to recognize the importance of this process and a major contributor to its elucidation. A few older geologists still resist the notion that important changes in the Earth’s structure and history are the consequences of extraterres- trial impact events. The decades of lunar and planetary exploration since 1970 have, how- ever, brought a new perspective into view, one in which it is clear that high-velocity impacts have, at one time or another, affected nearly every atom that is part of our planetary system.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Rotation Rates and Axis Ratios of the Smallest Known Near-Earth
    On the rotation rates and axis ratios of the smallest known near-Earth asteroids—the archetypes of the Asteroid Redirect Mission targets Patrick Hatcha, Paul A. Wiegerta,b,∗ aDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Western Ontario, London, N6A 3K7 CANADA bCentre for Planetary Science and Exploration, The University of Western Ontario, London, N6A 3K7 CANADA Abstract NASA’s Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) has been proposed with the aim to capture a small asteroid a few meters in size and redirect it into an orbit around the Moon. There it can be investigated at leisure by astronauts aboard an Orion or other spacecraft. The target for the mission has not yet been selected, and there are very few potential targets currently known. Though sufficiently small near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) are thought to be numerous, they are also difficult to detect and characterize with current observational facilities. Here we collect the most up-to-date information on near-Earth asteroids in this size range to outline the state of understanding of the properties of these small NEAs. Observational biases certainly mean that our sample is not an ideal representation of the true population of small NEAs. However our sample is representative of the eventual target list for the ARM mission, which will be compiled under very similar observational constraints unless dramatic changes are made to the way near-Earth asteroids are searched for and studied. We collect here information on 88 near-Earth asteroids with diameters less than 60 meters and with high quality light curves. We find that the typical rotation period is 40 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orbital Evolution of Asteroid 367943 Duende (2012 Da14) Under Yarkovsky Effect Influence and Its Implications for Collision with the Earth
    Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue on AASEC’2016, October (2017) 42 - 52 © School of Engineering, Taylor’s University THE ORBITAL EVOLUTION OF ASTEROID 367943 DUENDE (2012 DA14) UNDER YARKOVSKY EFFECT INFLUENCE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR COLLISION WITH THE EARTH JUDHISTIRA ARIA UTAMA1,2,*, TAUFIQ HIDAYAT3, UMAR FAUZI4 1Astronomy Post Graduate Study Program, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia 2Physics Education Department, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229, Bandung, 40154, Indonesia 3Astronomy Research Division, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia 4Geophysics & Complex System Research Division, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract Asteroid 367943 Duende (2012 DA14) holds the record as the one of Aten subpopulation with H 24 that had experienced deep close encounter event to the Earth (0.09x Earth-Moon distance) as informed in NASA website. In this work, we studied the orbital evolution of 120 asteroid clones and the nominal up to 5 Megayears (Myr) in the future using Swift integrator package with and without the Yarkovsky effect inclusion. At the end of orbital integration with both integrators, we found as many as 17 asteroid clones end their lives as Earth impactor. The prediction of maximum semimajor axis drift for this subkilometer-sized asteroid from diurnal and seasonal variants of Yarkovsky effect was 9.0×10-3 AU/Myr and 2.6×10-4 AU/Myr, respectively. By using the MOID (Minimum Orbital Intersection Distance) data set calculated from our integrators of entire clones and nominal asteroids, we obtained the value of impact rate with the Earth of 2.35×10-7 per year (with Yarkovsky effect) and 2.37×10-7 per year (without Yarkovsky effect), which corresponds to a mean lifetime of 4.25 Myr and 4.22 Myr, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]