DOCSLIB.ORG

An Elite Paedo Ring and the Abuse of Children in the North Wales ‘Care’ System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Elite Paedo Ring and the Abuse of Children in the North Wales ‘Care’ System AN ELITE PAEDO RING AND THE ABUSE OF CHILDREN IN THE NORTH WALES ‘CARE’ SYSTEM. Organised paedophilia is happening on a global scale that staggers the imagination. My research is concentrated in the North Wales region. “The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~J. Edgar Hoover On 9/11/2012 ‘Care’ home CSA victim Steve Messham famously said “After seeing a picture in the past hour of the individual concerned, this [is] not the person I identified by photograph presented to me by the police in the early 1990s, who told me the man in the photograph was Lord McAlpine.” David Rose co-wrote a Daily Mail article on 13/11/12. It was a defamatory hatchet job on Steve Messham, and was in stark contrast to an article which was co-written by David Rose for the Observer back in September 1992 whereby Messham’s testimony did not come into question. Why the about turn? In the Mail article it is stated: “Of all the allegations made by Messham and others, it was the heinous accusations against Lord McAlpine that were the most sensational. These claims were aired in detail at the Waterhouse inquiry, in which the name ‘McAlpine’ was raised.” Indeed they were. The North Wales child abuse scandal was the subject of a three-year, £13 million investigation into the physical and sexual abuse of children in ‘care’ homes in North Wales, including the Bryn Estyn children's home at Wrexham. This child abuse investigation was considered to be the biggest ever held in Britain. The report into the scandal, headed by retired High Court judge Sir Ronald Waterhouse QC was published in 2000. Sir Ron had been unable to ascertain who had told Steve that one of his abusers was Lord Alistair McAlpine. That person was a police officer who would, years later, be the cause of the ‘mistaken identity’ furore. Sir Ron’s ‘Lost in Care’ report consists of 893 pages, yet there is no mention at all of the police officer who had shown Steve a photo back in the early 90s of a man that the officer had told him was Lord McAlpine. Why? The following are some of the questions I ask of Waterhouse: Why didn’t Waterhouse establish who had interviewed Messham and shown him the photo back in the early 1990s? Why didn’t Waterhouse establish why that police officer had incorrectly told Messham that the man in the photo was Lord McAlpine? Why didn’t Waterhouse establish who the man in the photo was? Why didn’t Waterhouse find out if that photo is still in existence? Why didn’t Waterhouse state exactly when this police officer had shown Messham the photo which we are told was ‘back in the early 1990s’? Why didn’t Waterhouse outline what action was taken as a result of Messham’s interview by the police at that time? Why didn’t Waterhouse establish who the senior police officer was who had received the ‘5 or 6 dozen’ explicit photos of Steve and other boys being sodomized by their abusers that Steve Messham had handed to police when he was 16 years old? Why didn’t Waterhouse state the exact date of this occurrence? Why didn’t he name the senior interviewing officers who would have interviewed him at that time? Why isn’t a summary of that interview and the outcome of it outlined in the Waterhouse report? Why didn’t Waterhouse establish whether or not said photos were still in existence, and if they weren’t, who had given the order for them to be shredded? All of this and more is addressed in great detail further on. But first, Richard Webster. According to him, “‘Darren Laverty,’ he said, ‘was a key, high-profile witness at the Waterhouse inquiry. He was never sexually abused but his evidence could corroborate that of those who fell victim to the paedophiles working at and visiting the homes’ [italics added].” http://www.richardwebster.net/print/xfileon4.htm For more on Darren Laverty, see http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/DARREN_LAVERTY.php Now, take a look at this website https://secretofbrynestyn.wordpress.com/ which purports to be “Setting The Story Straight” about Bryn Estyn and a V.I.P paedophile ring. Straightaway I noticed there is nothing on there about the author – not even a name. Then I noticed that if you take a look at the Home [introduction] page, you find that everything written under the August 18, 2013 TRUESTORIES Abuse, BrynEstyn, FalseAllegations, Waterhouse,Wrexham titles doesn’t correspond with the individual titles and is just a repeat of the contents of the Home page. Now take a look at the titles under ‘POSTS’, again these are all just copy/pasted articles from the Home Page. These are signs of a shill site. It looks like the author of this site is Richard Webster. One clue is that the article on Angus Stickler https://secretofbrynestyn.wordpress.com/2013/07/18/angus-stickler/ is an exact copy of the article on Webster’s site http://www.richardwebster.net/print/xfileon4.htm Other articles are also copy/pasted from the same site or from Webster’s book which is advertised in the reviews section: The Secret of Bryn Estyn The Making of a Modern Witch Hunt by RICHARD WEBSTER SHORTLISTED FOR THE ORWELL PRIZE The Orwell Press Hardcover 2005 The reviews page has a collection of fawning admiration and gushing accolades from the well-heeled British gentry. These comments and some of the “Readers Write” comments have been taken from the richardwebster.net blog. [Others commenting are Laverty and Zoompad.] Why isn’t it made clear on the ‘Secret of Bryn Estyn – Setting The Story Straight’ blog who the author is? Since Webster died in June 2011 someone else has obviously been managing the blog. There could be various contributors; and if that’s the case, I would hazard a guess that one of them is Darren Laverty. Here http://www.spiked- online.com/review_of_books/article/6161#.VJlZWsgo it is stated: “The bare bones of the Bryn Estyn story, also supplied on the Orwell Press website...” Presumably that reference is to the ‘Setting The Story Straight’ site, as it is stated on the above link: “See the Orwell Press website. The Orwell Press is Richard Webster’s own imprint.” Now, notice Webster got shortlisted for the Orwell Prize. Jeesh, it doesn’t get any more in your face than that! Richard Webster gets his book published; it gets heavily promoted and is praised to the hilt by high society ... it’s so good it’s in line for the Orwell Prize ... and it earns Webster a lot of money. Folks, Richard Webster is just another fully paid up establishment rat bastard. Real opposition do NOT get recognised for their good works. We get persecuted to hell instead. More on Webster throughout this PDF. The following [from the above link] is taken from ‘Spiked’, entitled ‘The making of a modern-day witch hunt’ dated January 2009, and written by Jennie Bristow. It was not endorsed by Angus James who was the editor of Spiked but who had died – in suspicious circumstances - in September 1996. [Angus James was the co-founder of Scallywag Magazine http://scallywagarchive.info/ together with his half brother Simon Regan, now also deceased]. My comments, as always, are in red. I quote: “This triggered the largest child abuse investigation in Britain, which used a novel method of police investigation: trawling former residents of care homes for retrospective allegations. This method means that, instead of acting upon allegations of abuse made spontaneously by individuals, the police contacted those who were resident at the care home at the time of the alleged abuse. The story became a national scandal. A senior police officer Former North Wales Police superintendent Gordon Anglsea, publicly accused of raping adolescent boys at Bryn Estyn, sued two national newspapers, a magazine and a television company for libel and won. This is dealt with in detail further on. However, rumours of a cover-up persisted; and in 1996 the then Tory government set up the largest Tribunal of Inquiry in British history, under Sir Ronald Waterhouse. In February 2000, the Tribunal made damning findings of extensive abuse in North Wales – although it did not find evidence of a police cover-up. Scallywag says: “The fact that the Waterhouse report went as far as it did is highly commendable, and obviously long overdue. But the trouble with any investigation which tries to break through a ‘cult of silence’ is the lingering doubts that it will ever get down to the whole full truth of the matter. Waterhouse is probably merely the tip of the iceberg.” [See my PDF ‘Digging into Jimmy’s socks’ http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/DIGGING_INTO_JIMMYS_SOCKS.php By then the police trawling operation which had begun there had spread to the whole of Britain. Police forces collected allegations against 5,000 former care workers and teachers, and hundreds were arrested. This is another brilliant psy-op from the Masonic PTB. I don’t actually believe that any such ‘trawling’ happened. I think we’re being subjected to spin by the Masonic propaganda machine. But if it did occur, then since any police operation is authorised by high level Masonic powers in the police, we have to ask who authorised ‘trawling’? If it did happen the person[s] behind that devious and deceitful and criminally abhorrent waste of taxpayer’s money should be named and shamed and locked up for a very long time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Learning the Lessons: Operation Pallial 1
    Learning the lessons: Operation Pallial 1 Learning the lessons: Operation Pallial Children’s Commissioner for Wales January 2015 Learning the lessons: Operation Pallial 2 Acknowledgments With thanks to the survivors who gave their time and spoke so honestly. Their experience is an intensely personal one and this report hopefully goes some way towards repaying the trust they have shown. Learning the lessons and acting on their experience will hopefully help future investigations involving adult survivors of childhood sexual and physical abuse. This report is available in alternative formats by phoning us on 01792 765600 or emailing us at [email protected] Learning the lessons: Operation Pallial 3 Contents 1. Foreword by Keith Towler, Children’s Commissioner for Wales 2. Introduction 3. Origins of Operation Pallial 4. Key Themes a. Voice and Support b. Communications c. Resourcing and Transition d. Implications on children in present care settings 5. Conclusion Learning the lessons: Operation Pallial 4 Foreword by Keith Towler, Children’s Commissioner for Wales December 2014 Earlier this year I was asked by Keith Bristow, Director General of the National Crime Agency (NCA), to coordinate and publish a report looking at how agencies, including the police, local authorities, the NCA and Victim Support, have worked together to support complainants involved with Operation Pallial. These agencies, along with myself as the Children’s Commissioner for Wales, form part of Operation Pallial’s Strategic Coordinating Group. This report will attempt for the first time to identify any emerging lessons that any future operation could learn from and examine the implications of Operation Pallial on children and young people in care settings today.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffer the Little Children
    Suffer the little children Introduction Suffer the children For this paper I take this quote from the ASV Bible in a different sense to its real meaning. Obviously the real interpretation of Matthew 19:14 is, ‘Let alone’ or ‘permit’. 1 However, this paper regards the real suffering of children in this corrupt society. This Bible verse is one of many that show Jesus’ concern for young children. In this he is manifesting the concern of God in general for children, hence the Lord’s condemnation in the OT of hurting children. 2 The iniquity of hurting children Since God cares for children and commands his people to be good to their children, it is anathema to hurt children; indeed this is ingrained upon the conscience of every rational person. Thus the practice of abusing children is both irrational and worthy of God’s condemnation to hell fire. Any government that presided over abusing children, or knowingly tolerated this abuse, is insane, ungodly and worthy of condemnation. The great sin of Israel One of the key reasons given in the Old Testament for Israel’s judgment and condemnation was that its idolatry from God to idols caused Israelites to sacrifice their children to Molech. Israel’s apostasy was so great that its rulers ritually killed their own children. Ritual killing of children was an evil practised by idolatrous nations and so God commanded Israel, from the beginning, never to do such a thing. Indeed, God judged the previous nations in Canaan for completing their iniquity and making their judgment certain by sacrificing their children in the fulness of their sin.
    [Show full text]
  • Bookbinding Co
    Bound by University of South Wales Abbey Bookbinding Co. 105 Cathays Terrace. Cardiff CrU 4HU. U.K. Tel: -i-M (0)29 2039 5882 2064740 Email: [email protected] www.bookbindersuk.com From the Poor law to New Labour A Comparative Analysis of Interventions to Support Families Howell. G. Edwards A submission in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Glamorgan / Prifysgol Morgannwg for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. March 2004 Abstract The thesis explores the changing role that family support and social casework have played since the time of the Poor Law, and places these changes within the wider child care policy context. It highlights the importance of the Children Act 1989 to the recent development of support services for families. It argues that placing family support services within a framework ensures that services are developed to meet identified needs, and assists in mapping and evaluating those services. The thesis contends that it is vital for families to receive structured support since poverty has such a destructive impact on children and family life. The community development dimension of family support is seen as being important particularly in respect of open access support, as are the participation and empowerment of users. Listening to and acknowledging the rights of children are identified as key challenges for the future. The thesis reviews the evidence for the effectiveness of family support and social casework . It explores methodologies adopted in evaluating such services. The thesis reviews the process of establishing a community-based children resource centre in an economically and socially deprived community.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Lords Official Report
    Vol. 758 Thursday No. 85 15 January 2015 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDER OF BUSINESS Questions HIV..................................................................................................................................................891 Personal Independence Payments ..................................................................................................893 United States: Haggis Ban............................................................................................................896 Milk Production..............................................................................................................................897 Business of the House Timing of Debates..........................................................................................................................900 Natural Environment Motion to Take Note.....................................................................................................................901 NHS: Accident and Emergency Services Question for Short Debate.............................................................................................................934 Mental Health Motion to Take Note.....................................................................................................................948 Insurance Bill [HL] Third Reading..................................................................................................................................980 Developing World: Maternal and Neonatal
    [Show full text]
  • The Report of the Macur Review (Revised Redacted Version)
    The Report of the Macur Review (Revised Redacted Version) An independent review of the Tribunal of Inquiry into the abuse of children in care in the former county council areas of Gwynedd and Clwyd in North Wales since 1974 The Right Honourable Lady Justice Macur, DBE December 2017 Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 5 December 2017 for The Report of the Macur Review An independent review of the Tribunal of Inquiry into the abuse of children in care in the former county council areas of Gwynedd and Clwyd in North Wales since 1974 (Revised Redacted Version) The Right Honourable Lady Justice Macur, DBE, Lady Justice of Appeal Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 5 December 2017 HC390 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-0022-4 CCS0817897938 12/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Contents Foreword 1 Summary 3 Chapter 1: Introduction 15 Chapter 2: Methodology 25 Chapter 3: Background and Delay
    [Show full text]
  • The Inquiries Act 2005
    HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on the Inquiries Act 2005 Report of Session 2013–14 The Inquiries Act 2005: post-legislative scrutiny Ordered to be printed 26 February 2014 and published 11 March 2014 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £15.50 HL Paper 143 Select Committee on the Inquiries Act 2005 The Committee was appointed by the House of Lords “to consider and report on the law and practice relating to inquiries into matters of public concern, in particular the Inquiries Act 2005”. Current Membership The Members of the Committee are: Baroness Buscombe Baroness Gould of Potternewton Baroness Hamwee Lord King of Bridgwater Lord Morris of Aberavon Lord Richard Lord Shutt of Greetland (Chairman) Lord Soley Baroness Stern Lord Trefgarne Lord Trimble Lord Woolf Declarations of Interests See Appendix 1 A full list of Members’ interests can be found in the Register of Lords’ Interests: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords-interests Publications All publications of the Committee are available on the internet at: http://www.parliament.uk/inquiries-act-2005-publications Parliament Live Live coverage of debates and public sessions of the Committee’s meetings are available at: http://www.parliamentlive.tv General Information General information about the House of Lords and its Committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is on the internet at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords Committee Staff Staff who worked on this inquiry include Michael Collon (Clerk), Luke Wilcox (Policy Analyst), Emily Greenwood (Policy Analyst) and Sarah Verrinder (Committee Assistant).
    [Show full text]