AN ELITE PAEDO RING AND THE ABUSE OF CHILDREN IN THE NORTH WALES ‘CARE’ SYSTEM. Organised paedophilia is happening on a global scale that staggers the imagination. My research is concentrated in the North Wales region. “The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~J. Edgar Hoover On 9/11/2012 ‘Care’ home CSA victim Steve Messham famously said “After seeing a picture in the past hour of the individual concerned, this [is] not the person I identified by photograph presented to me by the police in the early 1990s, who told me the man in the photograph was Lord McAlpine.” David Rose co-wrote a Daily Mail article on 13/11/12. It was a defamatory hatchet job on Steve Messham, and was in stark contrast to an article which was co-written by David Rose for the Observer back in September 1992 whereby Messham’s testimony did not come into question. Why the about turn? In the Mail article it is stated: “Of all the allegations made by Messham and others, it was the heinous accusations against Lord McAlpine that were the most sensational. These claims were aired in detail at the Waterhouse inquiry, in which the name ‘McAlpine’ was raised.” Indeed they were. The North Wales child abuse scandal was the subject of a three-year, £13 million investigation into the physical and sexual abuse of children in ‘care’ homes in North Wales, including the Bryn Estyn children's home at Wrexham. This child abuse investigation was considered to be the biggest ever held in Britain. The report into the scandal, headed by retired High Court judge Sir Ronald Waterhouse QC was published in 2000. Sir Ron had been unable to ascertain who had told Steve that one of his abusers was Lord Alistair McAlpine. That person was a police officer who would, years later, be the cause of the ‘mistaken identity’ furore. Sir Ron’s ‘Lost in Care’ report consists of 893 pages, yet there is no mention at all of the police officer who had shown Steve a photo back in the early 90s of a man that the officer had told him was Lord McAlpine. Why? The following are some of the questions I ask of Waterhouse: Why didn’t Waterhouse establish who had interviewed Messham and shown him the photo back in the early 1990s? Why didn’t Waterhouse establish why that police officer had incorrectly told Messham that the man in the photo was Lord McAlpine? Why didn’t Waterhouse establish who the man in the photo was? Why didn’t Waterhouse find out if that photo is still in existence? Why didn’t Waterhouse state exactly when this police officer had shown Messham the photo which we are told was ‘back in the early 1990s’? Why didn’t Waterhouse outline what action was taken as a result of Messham’s interview by the police at that time? Why didn’t Waterhouse establish who the senior police officer was who had received the ‘5 or 6 dozen’ explicit photos of Steve and other boys being sodomized by their abusers that Steve Messham had handed to police when he was 16 years old? Why didn’t Waterhouse state the exact date of this occurrence? Why didn’t he name the senior interviewing officers who would have interviewed him at that time? Why isn’t a summary of that interview and the outcome of it outlined in the Waterhouse report? Why didn’t Waterhouse establish whether or not said photos were still in existence, and if they weren’t, who had given the order for them to be shredded? All of this and more is addressed in great detail further on. But first, Richard Webster. According to him, “‘Darren Laverty,’ he said, ‘was a key, high-profile witness at the Waterhouse inquiry. He was never sexually abused but his evidence could corroborate that of those who fell victim to the paedophiles working at and visiting the homes’ [italics added].” http://www.richardwebster.net/print/xfileon4.htm For more on Darren Laverty, see http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/DARREN_LAVERTY.php Now, take a look at this website https://secretofbrynestyn.wordpress.com/ which purports to be “Setting The Story Straight” about Bryn Estyn and a V.I.P paedophile ring. Straightaway I noticed there is nothing on there about the author – not even a name. Then I noticed that if you take a look at the Home [introduction] page, you find that everything written under the August 18, 2013 TRUESTORIES Abuse, BrynEstyn, FalseAllegations, Waterhouse,Wrexham titles doesn’t correspond with the individual titles and is just a repeat of the contents of the Home page. Now take a look at the titles under ‘POSTS’, again these are all just copy/pasted articles from the Home Page. These are signs of a shill site. It looks like the author of this site is Richard Webster. One clue is that the article on Angus Stickler https://secretofbrynestyn.wordpress.com/2013/07/18/angus-stickler/ is an exact copy of the article on Webster’s site http://www.richardwebster.net/print/xfileon4.htm Other articles are also copy/pasted from the same site or from Webster’s book which is advertised in the reviews section: The Secret of Bryn Estyn The Making of a Modern Witch Hunt by RICHARD WEBSTER SHORTLISTED FOR THE ORWELL PRIZE The Orwell Press Hardcover 2005 The reviews page has a collection of fawning admiration and gushing accolades from the well-heeled British gentry. These comments and some of the “Readers Write” comments have been taken from the richardwebster.net blog. [Others commenting are Laverty and Zoompad.] Why isn’t it made clear on the ‘Secret of Bryn Estyn – Setting The Story Straight’ blog who the author is? Since Webster died in June 2011 someone else has obviously been managing the blog. There could be various contributors; and if that’s the case, I would hazard a guess that one of them is Darren Laverty. Here http://www.spiked- online.com/review_of_books/article/6161#.VJlZWsgo it is stated: “The bare bones of the Bryn Estyn story, also supplied on the Orwell Press website...” Presumably that reference is to the ‘Setting The Story Straight’ site, as it is stated on the above link: “See the Orwell Press website. The Orwell Press is Richard Webster’s own imprint.” Now, notice Webster got shortlisted for the Orwell Prize. Jeesh, it doesn’t get any more in your face than that! Richard Webster gets his book published; it gets heavily promoted and is praised to the hilt by high society ... it’s so good it’s in line for the Orwell Prize ... and it earns Webster a lot of money. Folks, Richard Webster is just another fully paid up establishment rat bastard. Real opposition do NOT get recognised for their good works. We get persecuted to hell instead. More on Webster throughout this PDF. The following [from the above link] is taken from ‘Spiked’, entitled ‘The making of a modern-day witch hunt’ dated January 2009, and written by Jennie Bristow. It was not endorsed by Angus James who was the editor of Spiked but who had died – in suspicious circumstances - in September 1996. [Angus James was the co-founder of Scallywag Magazine http://scallywagarchive.info/ together with his half brother Simon Regan, now also deceased]. My comments, as always, are in red. I quote: “This triggered the largest child abuse investigation in Britain, which used a novel method of police investigation: trawling former residents of care homes for retrospective allegations. This method means that, instead of acting upon allegations of abuse made spontaneously by individuals, the police contacted those who were resident at the care home at the time of the alleged abuse. The story became a national scandal. A senior police officer Former North Wales Police superintendent Gordon Anglsea, publicly accused of raping adolescent boys at Bryn Estyn, sued two national newspapers, a magazine and a television company for libel and won. This is dealt with in detail further on. However, rumours of a cover-up persisted; and in 1996 the then Tory government set up the largest Tribunal of Inquiry in British history, under Sir Ronald Waterhouse. In February 2000, the Tribunal made damning findings of extensive abuse in North Wales – although it did not find evidence of a police cover-up. Scallywag says: “The fact that the Waterhouse report went as far as it did is highly commendable, and obviously long overdue. But the trouble with any investigation which tries to break through a ‘cult of silence’ is the lingering doubts that it will ever get down to the whole full truth of the matter. Waterhouse is probably merely the tip of the iceberg.” [See my PDF ‘Digging into Jimmy’s socks’ http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/DIGGING_INTO_JIMMYS_SOCKS.php By then the police trawling operation which had begun there had spread to the whole of Britain. Police forces collected allegations against 5,000 former care workers and teachers, and hundreds were arrested. This is another brilliant psy-op from the Masonic PTB. I don’t actually believe that any such ‘trawling’ happened. I think we’re being subjected to spin by the Masonic propaganda machine. But if it did occur, then since any police operation is authorised by high level Masonic powers in the police, we have to ask who authorised ‘trawling’? If it did happen the person[s] behind that devious and deceitful and criminally abhorrent waste of taxpayer’s money should be named and shamed and locked up for a very long time.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages137 Page
-
File Size-