DOCSLIB.ORG

On a Problem Connected with Beta and Gamma Distributions by R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On a Problem Connected with Beta and Gamma Distributions by R ON A PROBLEM CONNECTED WITH BETA AND GAMMA DISTRIBUTIONS BY R. G. LAHA(i) 1. Introduction. The random variable X is said to have a Gamma distribution G(x;0,a)if du for x > 0, (1.1) P(X = x) = G(x;0,a) = JoT(a)" 0 for x ^ 0, where 0 > 0, a > 0. Let X and Y be two independently and identically distributed random variables each having a Gamma distribution of the form (1.1). Then it is well known [1, pp. 243-244], that the random variable W = X¡iX + Y) has a Beta distribution Biw ; a, a) given by 0 for w = 0, (1.2) PiW^w) = Biw;x,x)=\ ) u"-1il-u)'-1du for0<w<l, Ío T(a)r(a) 1 for w > 1. Now we can state the converse problem as follows : Let X and Y be two independently and identically distributed random variables having a common distribution function Fix). Suppose that W = Xj{X + Y) has a Beta distribution of the form (1.2). Then the question is whether £(x) is necessarily a Gamma distribution of the form (1.1). This problem was posed by Mauldon in [9]. He also showed that the converse problem is not true in general and constructed an example of a non-Gamma distribution with this property using the solution of an integral equation which was studied by Goodspeed in [2]. In the present paper we carry out a systematic investigation of this problem. In §2, we derive some general properties possessed by this class of distribution laws Fix). In §3, we give some analytical lemmas. In §4, we make use of the lemmas and deduce a characterization of a class of dis- tribution laws having moments of a certain order. In the final section, we construct some further examples of distribution functions Fix). Received by the editors May 25,1960 and, in revised form, June 7, 1963. (!) This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through Grants NSF-G 4220 and NSF-G 9968. 287 License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use 288 R. G. LAHA (November 2. Some general properties of distribution laws. We first prove a lemma which is instrumental in the proof of the subsequent theorem. Lemma 2.1. Let X and Y be two independently and identically distributed random variables with a common distribution function Fix) which is continuous at the point x = 0. Suppose that the quotient V = XjY has a one-sided distribution F0iv) such that F0(u) = 0for v^O. Then X has also a one-sided distribution. Proof. As usual we assume that each of the distribution functions F(x) and F0iv) is everywhere continuous to the right so that for every v > 0, we have Foi0) - Foi - v) = Prob( - v< XjY < 0) (2.1) = JJ [F(0)-F(-!;y)]dF(y) + f [F(-t;y-0)-F(0)]dF(y). J - 00 From the conditions of the lemma we have Fo(0) = F0( — i;) = 0 for every v > 0 so that (2.1) gives fiOO (2.2a) [F(0)-F(-i;y)]dF(y) = 0, Jo (2.2b) f [F( -vy-0)- F(0)]dFiy) = 0 J-00 holding for all v > 0. Then it follows immediately from (2.2a) that either Fiy) = 0 for all y = 0 or Fiy) = 1 for all y ^ 0. It is also easy to verify that the relation (2.2b) is satisfied in either of the above cases.This completes the proof of the lemma. We next prove the following theorem: Theorem 2.1. Let X and Y be two independently and identically distributed random variables with a common distribution function Fix). Let the random variable W = XfiX + Y) follow the Beta distribution of the form (1.2). Then Fix) has the following general properties: (1) Either Fix) = Ofor x^Oor Fix) = 1for x ^ 0, (2) F(x) is absolutely continuous and has a continuous probability density function p(x) = F\x) > 0. Proof. It is easy to verify from the conditions of the theorem that the quotient V = XjY = W/il - W) has the distribution function F0(t>)given by License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use 1964] BETA AND GAMMA DISTRIBUTIONS 289 r r(2a) ua_1 -du fory>0, (2.3) F0iv) = r(a)r(a) (1 +«)2« 0 for v < 0. Thus property ( 1) follows immediately from Lemma 2.1. Therefore, we can assume without any loss of generality that F(x) = 0 for x = 0, that is, the random variable X is positive. After some elementary integration we can easily derive from (2.3) the characteristic function of the distribution of In F as: Ft ¿tin v, _ Tix + it)rjx-it) He ] - Tix)Tix) • We denote the characteristic function of the distribution of In ATby ^(f) and thus obtain the basic equation T(a + ¿r)r(a- it) (2.4) <K0<K-0 = r(a)r(a) holding for all real f. Then using the elementary property of the Gamma function we can at once verify that /?,„ | i/r(f)| dt < co, that is, the characteristic function iHO is absolutely integrable. Then using the Fourier-inversion theorem we conclude that the distribution function of InX is absolutely continuous and has a con- tinuous probability density function. Then it follows easily that F(x) is also absolutely continuous and has a continuous probability density function p(x) = F'ix) > 0. 3. Some analytical lemmas. In this section we discuss some analytical lemmas which are instrumental in the proofs of the subsequent theorems. Lemma 3.1. Let /(z) be an analytic characteristic function which is regular in a certain horizontal strip of maximum width containing the real axis. Then the purely imaginary points on the boundary of this strip of regularity are singular points offz). This lemma is due to Levy [5]. A proof of this lemma is given by Lukacs in [8]. Lemma 3.2. Let /(z) be a decomposable characteristic function which is regular in a strip — ß < Imz < ß iß >0) of the complex z-plane. LetfAz) be a factor offiz). Then the characteristic function fxiz) is also regular at least in the same strip. This lemma on the factorization of analytic characteristic functions is due toRaikov[10]. Lemma 3.3. Let Riz) be an entire function of order unity having only purely imaginary zeros and R(0) = 1. Then its reciprocal 1/R(z) is always a charac- teristic function. License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use 290 R. G. LAHA [November The proof of this lemma is given in [6, p. 140]. Lemma 3.4. Letfz) be an analytic characteristic function and suppose that fo(z) = [/(z) +/( - z)]/2 andfiz) = [/(z) -/( - z)]/2 are respectively the even and odd parts offiz). Let p,p0 and px denote respectively the radii of convergence of Maclaurin series for /(z),/0(z) andfxiz). Then p = p0 = px. This lemma has been proved by the author in [3]. Lemma 3.5. Let fz) be the characteristic function of an infinitely divisible distribution which is regular in a certain horizontal strip. Then /(z) has no zeros inside its strip of regularity and therefore </>(z)= ln/(z) is defined and regular in the same strip. Moreover, the function 0(z) = <b"iz)l<b"i0) is also a characteristic function which is regular in the same strip. The proof of this lemma is given in [8]. Lemma 3.6. Let p(x) be a continuous non-negative function of the real variable x. Let the integral J^ x"p(x) dx (y reaO exist for all v in the interval 0 < v < V iV> 0).Then the integral Iiz)= f0°°x~lzp(x)dx as a function of the complex variable z is regular in the strip 0 < Imz < Vof the upper half-plane. This lemma has been proved by the author in [4]. As a special case of this lemma, we note that if the integral J" x"pix)dx exists for all real v > 0, then the integral I{z) is regular throughout the upper half-plane Imz > 0. Lemma 3.7. Let the distribution function F(x) of a positive random variable X be absolutely continuous and have a continuous probability density function p(x) = F'(x) > 0. Let Fix) possess finite absolute moments up to a certain order ô (á > 0 not necessarily an integer). Let rpit) = Eie"inX) denote the characteristic function of the distribution oflnX. Then the function ¡¡/i-z) = Eie-izlnX) considered as a function of the complex variable z is regular in the strip 0 < Imz < 5 + £ (s > 0 may be a suficiently small number). Conversely if the function \pi — z) is regular in the strip 0<Imz<<5+£ (s > 0 arbitrarily small), then F(x) has finite absolute moments up to order <5. Proof. Since the distribution function F(x) has finite absolute moments up to order <5,the integral f™x"pix)dx exists for all real v in the interval 0 < v < 5 + e (where s may be an arbitrarily small positive number). We further note that iK - z) = £(e"izInX ) = r x~izpix)dx. Then the proof follows at once from Lemma 3.6. The proof of the converse statement is immediate, License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use 1964] BETA AND GAMMA DISTRIBUTIONS 291 As a special case of Lemma 3.7, it follows that if F(x) has finite moments of all orders, then the function i/r( - z) is regular throughout the upper half-plane lmz>0.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Random Variable X with Pdf G(X) = Λα Γ(Α) X ≥ 0 Has Gamma
    DISTRIBUTIONS DERIVED FROM THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION Definition: A random variable X with pdf λα g(x) = xα−1e−λx x ≥ 0 Γ(α) has gamma distribution with parameters α > 0 and λ > 0. The gamma function Γ(x), is defined as Z ∞ Γ(x) = ux−1e−udu. 0 Properties of the Gamma Function: (i) Γ(x + 1) = xΓ(x) (ii) Γ(n + 1) = n! √ (iii) Γ(1/2) = π. Remarks: 1. Notice that an exponential rv with parameter 1/θ = λ is a special case of a gamma rv. with parameters α = 1 and λ. 2. The sum of n independent identically distributed (iid) exponential rv, with parameter λ has a gamma distribution, with parameters n and λ. 3. The sum of n iid gamma rv with parameters α and λ has gamma distribution with parameters nα and λ. Definition: If Z is a standard normal rv, the distribution of U = Z2 called the chi-square distribution with 1 degree of freedom. 2 The density function of U ∼ χ1 is −1/2 x −x/2 fU (x) = √ e , x > 0. 2π 2 Remark: A χ1 random variable has the same density as a random variable with gamma distribution, with parameters α = 1/2 and λ = 1/2. Definition: If U1,U2,...,Uk are independent chi-square rv-s with 1 degree of freedom, the distribution of V = U1 + U2 + ... + Uk is called the chi-square distribution with k degrees of freedom. 2 Using Remark 3. and the above remark, a χk rv. follows gamma distribution with parameters 2 α = k/2 and λ = 1/2.
    [Show full text]
  • Stat 5101 Notes: Brand Name Distributions
    Stat 5101 Notes: Brand Name Distributions Charles J. Geyer February 14, 2003 1 Discrete Uniform Distribution Symbol DiscreteUniform(n). Type Discrete. Rationale Equally likely outcomes. Sample Space The interval 1, 2, ..., n of the integers. Probability Function 1 f(x) = , x = 1, 2, . , n n Moments n + 1 E(X) = 2 n2 − 1 var(X) = 12 2 Uniform Distribution Symbol Uniform(a, b). Type Continuous. Rationale Continuous analog of the discrete uniform distribution. Parameters Real numbers a and b with a < b. Sample Space The interval (a, b) of the real numbers. 1 Probability Density Function 1 f(x) = , a < x < b b − a Moments a + b E(X) = 2 (b − a)2 var(X) = 12 Relation to Other Distributions Beta(1, 1) = Uniform(0, 1). 3 Bernoulli Distribution Symbol Bernoulli(p). Type Discrete. Rationale Any zero-or-one-valued random variable. Parameter Real number 0 ≤ p ≤ 1. Sample Space The two-element set {0, 1}. Probability Function ( p, x = 1 f(x) = 1 − p, x = 0 Moments E(X) = p var(X) = p(1 − p) Addition Rule If X1, ..., Xk are i. i. d. Bernoulli(p) random variables, then X1 + ··· + Xk is a Binomial(k, p) random variable. Relation to Other Distributions Bernoulli(p) = Binomial(1, p). 4 Binomial Distribution Symbol Binomial(n, p). 2 Type Discrete. Rationale Sum of i. i. d. Bernoulli random variables. Parameters Real number 0 ≤ p ≤ 1. Integer n ≥ 1. Sample Space The interval 0, 1, ..., n of the integers. Probability Function n f(x) = px(1 − p)n−x, x = 0, 1, . , n x Moments E(X) = np var(X) = np(1 − p) Addition Rule If X1, ..., Xk are independent random variables, Xi being Binomial(ni, p) distributed, then X1 + ··· + Xk is a Binomial(n1 + ··· + nk, p) random variable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exponential Family 1 Definition
    The Exponential Family David M. Blei Columbia University November 9, 2016 The exponential family is a class of densities (Brown, 1986). It encompasses many familiar forms of likelihoods, such as the Gaussian, Poisson, multinomial, and Bernoulli. It also encompasses their conjugate priors, such as the Gamma, Dirichlet, and beta. 1 Definition A probability density in the exponential family has this form p.x / h.x/ exp >t.x/ a./ ; (1) j D f g where is the natural parameter; t.x/ are sufficient statistics; h.x/ is the “base measure;” a./ is the log normalizer. Examples of exponential family distributions include Gaussian, gamma, Poisson, Bernoulli, multinomial, Markov models. Examples of distributions that are not in this family include student-t, mixtures, and hidden Markov models. (We are considering these families as distributions of data. The latent variables are implicitly marginalized out.) The statistic t.x/ is called sufficient because the probability as a function of only depends on x through t.x/. The exponential family has fundamental connections to the world of graphical models (Wainwright and Jordan, 2008). For our purposes, we’ll use exponential 1 families as components in directed graphical models, e.g., in the mixtures of Gaussians. The log normalizer ensures that the density integrates to 1, Z a./ log h.x/ exp >t.x/ d.x/ (2) D f g This is the negative logarithm of the normalizing constant. The function h.x/ can be a source of confusion. One way to interpret h.x/ is the (unnormalized) distribution of x when 0. It might involve statistics of x that D are not in t.x/, i.e., that do not vary with the natural parameter.
    [Show full text]
  • A Skew Extension of the T-Distribution, with Applications
    J. R. Statist. Soc. B (2003) 65, Part 1, pp. 159–174 A skew extension of the t-distribution, with applications M. C. Jones The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK and M. J. Faddy University of Birmingham, UK [Received March 2000. Final revision July 2002] Summary. A tractable skew t-distribution on the real line is proposed.This includes as a special case the symmetric t-distribution, and otherwise provides skew extensions thereof.The distribu- tion is potentially useful both for modelling data and in robustness studies. Properties of the new distribution are presented. Likelihood inference for the parameters of this skew t-distribution is developed. Application is made to two data modelling examples. Keywords: Beta distribution; Likelihood inference; Robustness; Skewness; Student’s t-distribution 1. Introduction Student’s t-distribution occurs frequently in statistics. Its usual derivation and use is as the sam- pling distribution of certain test statistics under normality, but increasingly the t-distribution is being used in both frequentist and Bayesian statistics as a heavy-tailed alternative to the nor- mal distribution when robustness to possible outliers is a concern. See Lange et al. (1989) and Gelman et al. (1995) and references therein. It will often be useful to consider a further alternative to the normal or t-distribution which is both heavy tailed and skew. To this end, we propose a family of distributions which includes the symmetric t-distributions as special cases, and also includes extensions of the t-distribution, still taking values on the whole real line, with non-zero skewness. Let a>0 and b>0be parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • A Form of Multivariate Gamma Distribution
    Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. Vol. 44, No. 1, 97-106 (1992) A FORM OF MULTIVARIATE GAMMA DISTRIBUTION A. M. MATHAI 1 AND P. G. MOSCHOPOULOS2 1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McOill University, Montreal, Canada H3A 2K6 2Department of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968-0514, U.S.A. (Received July 30, 1990; revised February 14, 1991) Abstract. Let V,, i = 1,...,k, be independent gamma random variables with shape ai, scale /3, and location parameter %, and consider the partial sums Z1 = V1, Z2 = 171 + V2, . • •, Zk = 171 +. • • + Vk. When the scale parameters are all equal, each partial sum is again distributed as gamma, and hence the joint distribution of the partial sums may be called a multivariate gamma. This distribution, whose marginals are positively correlated has several interesting properties and has potential applications in stochastic processes and reliability. In this paper we study this distribution as a multivariate extension of the three-parameter gamma and give several properties that relate to ratios and conditional distributions of partial sums. The general density, as well as special cases are considered. Key words and phrases: Multivariate gamma model, cumulative sums, mo- ments, cumulants, multiple correlation, exact density, conditional density. 1. Introduction The three-parameter gamma with the density (x _ V)~_I exp (x-7) (1.1) f(x; a, /3, 7) = ~ , x>'7, c~>O, /3>0 stands central in the multivariate gamma distribution of this paper. Multivariate extensions of gamma distributions such that all the marginals are again gamma are the most common in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • A Family of Skew-Normal Distributions for Modeling Proportions and Rates with Zeros/Ones Excess
    S S symmetry Article A Family of Skew-Normal Distributions for Modeling Proportions and Rates with Zeros/Ones Excess Guillermo Martínez-Flórez 1, Víctor Leiva 2,* , Emilio Gómez-Déniz 3 and Carolina Marchant 4 1 Departamento de Matemáticas y Estadística, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad de Córdoba, Montería 14014, Colombia; [email protected] 2 Escuela de Ingeniería Industrial, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 2362807 Valparaíso, Chile 3 Facultad de Economía, Empresa y Turismo, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria and TIDES Institute, 35001 Canarias, Spain; [email protected] 4 Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Católica del Maule, 3466706 Talca, Chile; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 30 June 2020; Accepted: 19 August 2020; Published: 1 September 2020 Abstract: In this paper, we consider skew-normal distributions for constructing new a distribution which allows us to model proportions and rates with zero/one inflation as an alternative to the inflated beta distributions. The new distribution is a mixture between a Bernoulli distribution for explaining the zero/one excess and a censored skew-normal distribution for the continuous variable. The maximum likelihood method is used for parameter estimation. Observed and expected Fisher information matrices are derived to conduct likelihood-based inference in this new type skew-normal distribution. Given the flexibility of the new distributions, we are able to show, in real data scenarios, the good performance of our proposal. Keywords: beta distribution; centered skew-normal distribution; maximum-likelihood methods; Monte Carlo simulations; proportions; R software; rates; zero/one inflated data 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on the Existence of the Multivariate Gamma Distribution 1
    - 1 - A Note on the Existence of the Multivariate Gamma Distribution Thomas Royen Fachhochschule Bingen, University of Applied Sciences e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The p - variate gamma distribution in the sense of Krishnamoorthy and Parthasarathy exists for all positive integer degrees of freedom and at least for all real values pp 2, 2. For special structures of the “associated“ covariance matrix it also exists for all positive . In this paper a relation between central and non-central multivariate gamma distributions is shown, which implies the existence of the p - variate gamma distribution at least for all non-integer greater than the integer part of (p 1) / 2 without any additional assumptions for the associated covariance matrix. 1. Introduction The p-variate chi-square distribution (or more precisely: “Wishart-chi-square distribution“) with degrees of 2 freedom and the “associated“ covariance matrix (the p (,) - distribution) is defined as the joint distribu- tion of the diagonal elements of a Wp (,) - Wishart matrix. Its probability density (pdf) has the Laplace trans- form (Lt) /2 |ITp 2 | , (1.1) with the ()pp - identity matrix I p , , T diag( t1 ,..., tpj ), t 0, and the associated covariance matrix , which is assumed to be non-singular throughout this paper. The p - variate gamma distribution in the sense of Krishnamoorthy and Parthasarathy [4] with the associated covariance matrix and the “degree of freedom” 2 (the p (,) - distribution) can be defined by the Lt ||ITp (1.2) of its pdf g ( x1 ,..., xp ; , ). (1.3) 2 For values 2 this distribution differs from the p (,) - distribution only by a scale factor 2, but in this paper we are only interested in positive non-integer values 2 for which ||ITp is the Lt of a pdf and not of a function also assuming any negative values.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2 — September 24 2.1 Recap 2.2 Exponential Families
    STATS 300A: Theory of Statistics Fall 2015 Lecture 2 | September 24 Lecturer: Lester Mackey Scribe: Stephen Bates and Andy Tsao 2.1 Recap Last time, we set out on a quest to develop optimal inference procedures and, along the way, encountered an important pair of assertions: not all data is relevant, and irrelevant data can only increase risk and hence impair performance. This led us to introduce a notion of lossless data compression (sufficiency): T is sufficient for P with X ∼ Pθ 2 P if X j T (X) is independent of θ. How far can we take this idea? At what point does compression impair performance? These are questions of optimal data reduction. While we will develop general answers to these questions in this lecture and the next, we can often say much more in the context of specific modeling choices. With this in mind, let's consider an especially important class of models known as the exponential family models. 2.2 Exponential Families Definition 1. The model fPθ : θ 2 Ωg forms an s-dimensional exponential family if each Pθ has density of the form: s ! X p(x; θ) = exp ηi(θ)Ti(x) − B(θ) h(x) i=1 • ηi(θ) 2 R are called the natural parameters. • Ti(x) 2 R are its sufficient statistics, which follows from NFFC. • B(θ) is the log-partition function because it is the logarithm of a normalization factor: s ! ! Z X B(θ) = log exp ηi(θ)Ti(x) h(x)dµ(x) 2 R i=1 • h(x) 2 R: base measure.
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Binomial Regression Models and Estimation Methods
    Appendix D: Negative Binomial Regression Models and Estimation Methods By Dominique Lord Texas A&M University Byung-Jung Park Korea Transport Institute This appendix presents the characteristics of Negative Binomial regression models and discusses their estimating methods. Probability Density and Likelihood Functions The properties of the negative binomial models with and without spatial intersection are described in the next two sections. Poisson-Gamma Model The Poisson-Gamma model has properties that are very similar to the Poisson model discussed in Appendix C, in which the dependent variable yi is modeled as a Poisson variable with a mean i where the model error is assumed to follow a Gamma distribution. As it names implies, the Poisson-Gamma is a mixture of two distributions and was first derived by Greenwood and Yule (1920). This mixture distribution was developed to account for over-dispersion that is commonly observed in discrete or count data (Lord et al., 2005). It became very popular because the conjugate distribution (same family of functions) has a closed form and leads to the negative binomial distribution. As discussed by Cook (2009), “the name of this distribution comes from applying the binomial theorem with a negative exponent.” There are two major parameterizations that have been proposed and they are known as the NB1 and NB2, the latter one being the most commonly known and utilized. NB2 is therefore described first. Other parameterizations exist, but are not discussed here (see Maher and Summersgill, 1996; Hilbe, 2007). NB2 Model Suppose that we have a series of random counts that follows the Poisson distribution: i e i gyii; (D-1) yi ! where yi is the observed number of counts for i 1, 2, n ; and i is the mean of the Poisson distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Overdispersion with the Normalized Tempered Stable Distribution
    Modeling overdispersion with the normalized tempered stable distribution M. Kolossiatisa, J.E. Griffinb, M. F. J. Steel∗,c aDepartment of Hotel and Tourism Management, Cyprus University of Technology, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Limassol, Cyprus. bInstitute of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, U.K. cDepartment of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, U.K. Abstract A multivariate distribution which generalizes the Dirichlet distribution is intro- duced and its use for modeling overdispersion in count data is discussed. The distribution is constructed by normalizing a vector of independent tempered sta- ble random variables. General formulae for all moments and cross-moments of the distribution are derived and they are found to have similar forms to those for the Dirichlet distribution. The univariate version of the distribution can be used as a mixing distribution for the success probability of a binomial distribution to define an alternative to the well-studied beta-binomial distribution. Examples of fitting this model to simulated and real data are presented. Keywords: Distribution on the unit simplex; Mice fetal mortality; Mixed bino- mial; Normalized random measure; Overdispersion 1. Introduction In many experiments we observe data as the number of observations in a sam- ple with some property. The binomial distribution is a natural model for this type of data. However, the data are often found to be overdispersed relative to that ∗Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-2476-523369; fax: +44-2476-524532 Email addresses: [email protected] (M. Kolossiatis), [email protected] (J.E. Griffin), [email protected] (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributions (3) © 2008 Winton 2 VIII
    © 2008 Winton 1 Distributions (3) © onntiW8 020 2 VIII. Lognormal Distribution • Data points t are said to be lognormally distributed if the natural logarithms, ln(t), of these points are normally distributed with mean μ ion and standard deviatσ – If the normal distribution is sampled to get points rsample, then the points ersample constitute sample values from the lognormal distribution • The pdf or the lognormal distribution is given byf - ln(x)()μ 2 - 1 2 f(x)= e ⋅ 2 σ >(x 0) σx 2 π because ∞ - ln(x)()μ 2 - ∞ -() t μ-2 1 1 2 1 2 ∫ e⋅ 2eσ dx = ∫ dt ⋅ 2σ (where= t ln(x)) 0 xσ2 π 0σ2 π is the pdf for the normal distribution © 2008 Winton 3 Mean and Variance for Lognormal • It can be shown that in terms of μ and σ σ2 μ + E(X)= 2 e 2⋅μ σ + 2 σ2 Var(X)= e( ⋅ ) e - 1 • If the mean E and variance V for the lognormal distribution are given, then the corresponding μ and σ2 for the normal distribution are given by – σ2 = log(1+V/E2) – μ = log(E) - σ2/2 • The lognormal distribution has been used in reliability models for time until failure and for stock price distributions – The shape is similar to that of the Gamma distribution and the Weibull distribution for the case α > 2, but the peak is less towards 0 © 2008 Winton 4 Graph of Lognormal pdf f(x) 0.5 0.45 μ=4, σ=1 0.4 0.35 μ=4, σ=2 0.3 μ=4, σ=3 0.25 μ=4, σ=4 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 x 0510 μ and σ are the lognormal’s mean and std dev, not those of the associated normal © onntiW8 020 5 IX.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information on the Negative Binomial Distribution
    Supplementary information on the negative binomial distribution November 25, 2013 1 The Poisson distribution Consider a segment of DNA as a collection of a large number, say N, of individual intervals over which a break can take place. Furthermore, suppose the probability of a break in each interval is the same and is very small, say p(N), and breaks occur in the intervals independently of one another. Here, we need p to be a function of N because if there are more locations (i.e. N is increased) we need to make p smaller if we want to have the same model (since there are more opportunities for breaks). Since the number of breaks is a cumulative sum of iid Bernoulli variables, the distribution of breaks, y, is binomially distributed with parameters (N; p(N)), that is N P (y = k) = p(N)k(1 − p(N))N−k: k If we suppose p(N) = λ/N, for some λ, and we let N become arbitrarily large, then we find N P (y = k) = lim p(N)k(1 − p(N))N−k N!1 k N ··· (N − k + 1) = lim (λ/N)k(1 − λ/N)N−k N!1 k! λk N ··· (N − k + 1) = lim (1 − λ/N)N (1 − λ/N)−k N!1 k! N k = λke−λ=k! which is the Poisson distribution. It has a mean and variance of λ. The mean of a discrete random P 2 variable, y, is EY = k kP (Y = k) and the variance is E(Y − EY ) .
    [Show full text]