Revolutionary Narratives, Imperial Rivalries: Britain and the French Empire in the Nineteenth Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revolutionary Narratives, Imperial Rivalries: Britain and the French Empire in the Nineteenth Century Revolutionary Narratives, Imperial Rivalries: Britain and the French Empire in the Nineteenth Century Author: Matthew William Heitzman Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104076 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2013 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of English REVOLUTIONARY NARRATIVES, IMPERIAL RIVALRIES: BRITAIN AND THE FRENCH EMPIRE IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY A Dissertation by MATTHEW WILLIAM HEITZMAN submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2013 © copyright by MATTHEW WILLIAM HEITZMAN 2013 Revolutionary Narratives, Imperial Rivalries: Britain and the French Empire in the Nineteenth Century Author: Matthew William Heitzman Chair / AdVisor: Professor Rosemarie Bodenheimer Abstract: This dissertation considers England’s imperial riValry with France and its influence on literary production in the long nineteenth century. It offers a new context for the study of British imperialism by examining the ways in which mid- Victorian novels responded to and were shaped by the threat of French imperialism. It studies three canonical Victorian noVels: William Thackeray’s Vanity Fair (1846- 1848), Charlotte Brontë’s Villette (1853) and Charles Dickens’s A Tale of Two Cities (1859), and argues that even though these texts deal very lightly with the British colonies and feature Very few colonial figures, they are still Very much “about empire” because they are informed by British anxieties regarding French imperialism. Revolutionary Narratives links each noVel to a contemporary political crisis between England and France, and it argues that each novelist turns back to the Revolutionary period in response to and as a means to process a modern threat from France. This project also explains why Thackeray, Brontë and Dickens would return specifically to Revolutionary history in response to a French imperial threat. Its first chapter traces the ways in which “Revolutionary narratives,” stories about how the 1789 French ReVolution had changed the world, came to inform and to lend urgency to England and France’s global, imperial riValry through their deployment in abolitionist writings in both countries. Abolitionist tracts helped to fuse an association between “empire” and “ReVolution” in the Romantic period, and recognizing this helps us to understand why Victorian writers would use ReVolutionary narratiVes in response to imperial crisis. HoweVer, this dissertation ultimately asserts that Vanity Fair, Villette and A Tale of Two Cities revive Revolutionary history in order to write against it and to lament its primacy in popular discourse. In the mid nineteenth century, public discussion in England and France tended to return quickly to the history of the ReVolutionary period in order to contextualize new political drama between the two countries. This meant that history often seemed to be repeating itself when it came to England and France’s rivalry. Thackeray, Brontë and Dickens use Revolutionary history in their novels as a way to react against this popular use of history and in an effort to imagine a new path forward for England and France, one not burdened by the weight of the past. “There is no present or future, only the past, happening oVer and oVer again, now” -Eugene O’Neill A Moon for the Misbegotten CONTENTS Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………………………………..ii Introduction “There is No Present or Future, Only The Past”: Writing the Revolution in the Age of Empire…………………………………………………………………………………..………..1 Chapter One “The DeVil’s Code of Honor”: French Invasion and the Return of History in William Thackeray’s Vanity Fair…………………………………………...………………45 Chapter Two “Vous ne voulez pas de moi pour voisin”: Charlotte Brontë, Villette, and the Rise of Napoleon III……………………………………………………………………...………….84 Chapter Three “A Long and Constant Fusion of the Two Great Nations”: Charles Dickens, the Crossing, and A Tale of Two Cities……………………………………….…………………..136 Epilogue Literature and History…………………………………………………….......…………………179 Notes……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….186 Bibliography……………………………..………………………………………………..……………………208 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It’s easy to know who to thank, but impossible to know how to thank. Writing a dissertation can be a lonely endeavor, particularly when writing about isolated souls such as Charlotte Brontë or when tracing a dark period in Charles Dickens’s life. I’ve been able to follow, but not inhabit, their loneliness because of my remarkable family and friends, and because of the tremendous support I’Ve been blessed to find in Boston and beyond. Thank you first to my committee. Thanks to Alan Richardson for shepherding me through my exams and for finding the kernel that would become this dissertation. Thank you to Beth Kowaleski Wallace for being a constant champion of my work and teaching, and for being the Voice in my head as I wrote, always letting me know when I wasn’t actually making a point and being so pleased when I was. Thank you foremost to Rosemarie Bodenheimer. Ti, I’m staggered by the energy and attention you give to your teaching, your research, and your advising. Thank you for having such patience and faith in this project, and for giVing me so much guidance and support since it started. Thank you to Paula Mathieu and Lad Tobin. Lad, I’m so grateful that you thought to hire me as a teaching mentor years ago. Paula, thank you for trusting me to do so much in your writing program. Thank you as well for your unflinching support throughout my time at B.C. To my Burns Library family: DaVid Horn, Shelley Barber and Amy Braitsch. I haVen’t worked under the Ford Tower for years, but the Burns is still my home on campus. Thank you to David in particular for sparking my passion for archiVal work, for so many heated and exasperated discussions about the Red Sox, and for being a role model of the kind of person and teacher I want to be. I’Ve been so fortunate in my friendships in our graduate community. Thank you to Alison Van Vort and Wendy Cannella Matthews for saVing my sanity with our wonderful weekends in York. Thanks to Alison Cotti-Lowell and Katie Daily- Bruckner for stressing oVer setbacks and celebrating breakthroughs with me. Thanks to the amazing members of my Ph.D. cohort: Nick Gupta, Alex Puente, and Ali. You are all such amazing teachers, and I loVe knowing how many liVes you’Ve changed since we started together at B.C. Thanks finally to Kristin Imre for being my teaching mentor. Kristin, I will teach my entire career and neVer haVe your instinct for it. Thank you to Stephanie Loomis Pappas and Staci Shultz for two remarkable friendships that grow deeper and more important to me eVery year -even at a distance. Thank you to Steph for making me an honorary Loomis with all its attendant nerdiness and love. ii Thank you to Sara Stenson, my first and closest friend in Boston, for so many meals, so much laughter, and so much loVe since we started here. Thank you to Elizabeth Heisner for sharing my wanderlust and for such a remarkable and eVer-changing friendship. Thanks to jeff Bornino for taking what I do seriously but not letting me take it too seriously. Alyssa Connell. Eight years ago, I awkwardly smiled at you and you skeptically glared at me –not the most auspicious beginning. I neVer would haVe guessed how important you’d become in my life. Thank you for eVerything. Thank you for getting me through this. To my grandparents: Elizabeth and Charles Kehoe; joanne and Ralph Bell; Louis Heitzman, and Roger Binkley. You haVe all shaped who I am, eVen those of you I never knew. Thank you in particular to Papa for fostering my loVe for literature, history and travel. To my siblings, Mary and Michael Heitzman, and their beautiful children –thank you for all of your loVe and support as I finished this project. I’m amazed at the remarkable liVes you lead and the wonderful families you’Ve started. Finally, and most importantly, this dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Robert and Dottie Heitzman. There are no words to thank you for how completely you’Ve loVed and supported me on the long path to becoming Dr. Heitzman. Your three children haVe followed three different liVes, and you’Ve celebrated all of them equally. You always knew this day would come, eVen when I did not. iii INTRODUCTION “There is No Present or Future, Only The Past”: Writing the ReVolution in the Age of Empire Less than two months after the Battle of Waterloo, Sir Walter Scott traVeled to Belgium, joining the flood of British pilgrims flocking to the site of Wellington’s Victory oVer Napoleon’s forces. He chronicled his journey in his memoir, Paul’s Letters to His Kinsfolk (1816), an epistolary account of his time in Europe just after the war. His narration offers a fascinating glimpse into life in the immediate wake of Napoleon’s defeat. Scott reached Waterloo in early August 1815, and found that the battlefield had already been transformed into a popular shrine for British tourists, complete with an ad hoc market for relics from the war. What stands out in Scott’s description is the speed with which English civilians began to treat Waterloo as sacred historical ground, as well as the degree to which they evinced a personal connection to the history that had taken place there. The civilians who reach Waterloo comb the battlefield with the aVidity of impatient archeologists, frantically searching or bartering for any artifact from the war. Scott confesses: The eagerness with which we entered into these negotiations, and still more the zeal with which we picked up eVery trifle we could find upon the field, rather scandalized one of the heroes of the day, who did me the faVour to guide me oVer the field of battle, and who considered the interest I took in things which he was accustomed to see scattered as mere trumpery upon many a field of Victory, with a feeling that I belieVe made him for the moment heartily ashamed of his company.
Recommended publications
  • A. the Birth of the Second French Empire 1. in 1848, the French
    www.HistoryAtOurHouse.Com Lower Elementary Class Notes X. The Changing Face of Europe (1848-1914) A. The Birth of the Second French Empire 1. In 1848, the French people had elected Louis Napoleon as the president, but as the nephew of Napoleon he wished for the same kind of power his uncle had once had. 2. Louis Napoleon's convinced the people he would lead the country like his uncle, so they celebrated when he declared the Second French Empire, with himself at as Napoleon III. (Napoleon had had a son, known as Napoleon II.) B. The Unification of Italy (1815-1861) 1. In answer to the revolutions of 1830 and 1848 in France, the main northern Italian kingdom of Sardinia had tried to lead the charge towards the unification of Italy. 2. To succeed, however, Sardinia needed an alliance with Napoleon III against Austria. 3. As temporary allies, France and Sardinia both wished to weaken Austria, and in exchange for help to become the King of Italy, Sardinia could offer Napoleon the return of French lands taken away by Metternich. 4. With help from France, most of Italy was united by 1861. C. The Birth of the German Empire (1848-1871) 1. In 1848, when France became a republic again, people throughout Germany wanted to create their own combined parliament called the Frankfurt Assembly. 2. The Frankfurt Assembly soon offered the kingship of a united Germany to the King of Prussia, but at Olmutz in 1850, Austria and Russia forced Prussia to accept a divided Germany. In German history, this is known as the “Humiliation at Olmutz.” 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ideological Origins of the French Mediterranean Empire, 1789-1870
    The Civilizing Sea: The Ideological Origins of the French Mediterranean Empire, 1789-1870 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Dzanic, Dzavid. 2016. The Civilizing Sea: The Ideological Origins of the French Mediterranean Empire, 1789-1870. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33840734 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Civilizing Sea: The Ideological Origins of the French Mediterranean Empire, 1789-1870 A dissertation presented by Dzavid Dzanic to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts August 2016 © 2016 - Dzavid Dzanic All rights reserved. Advisor: David Armitage Author: Dzavid Dzanic The Civilizing Sea: The Ideological Origins of the French Mediterranean Empire, 1789-1870 Abstract This dissertation examines the religious, diplomatic, legal, and intellectual history of French imperialism in Italy, Egypt, and Algeria between the 1789 French Revolution and the beginning of the French Third Republic in 1870. In examining the wider logic of French imperial expansion around the Mediterranean, this dissertation bridges the Revolutionary, Napoleonic, Restoration (1815-30), July Monarchy (1830-48), Second Republic (1848-52), and Second Empire (1852-70) periods. Moreover, this study represents the first comprehensive study of interactions between imperial officers and local actors around the Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TALISMAN of CHARLEMAGNE: NEW HISTORICAL and GEMOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES Gerard Panczer, Geoffray Riondet, Lauriane Forest, Michael S
    FEATURE ARTICLES THE TALISMAN OF CHARLEMAGNE: NEW HISTORICAL AND GEMOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES Gerard Panczer, Geoffray Riondet, Lauriane Forest, Michael S. Krzemnicki, Davy Carole, and Florian Faure The gem-bearing reliquary known as the Talisman of Charlemagne is closely associated with the history of Europe. Its legend follows such figures as Charlemagne, Napoleon I, Empress Josephine, Hortense de Beauharnais, Napoleon III, and Empress Eugénie. This study provides new historical information collected in France, Germany, and Switzer- land about the provenance of this exceptional jewel, which contains a large glass cabochon on the front, a large blue-gray sapphire on the back, and an assortment of colored stones and pearls. The first scientific gemological analysis of this historical piece, carried out on-site at the Palace of Tau Museum in Reims, France, has made it possible to identify the colored stones and offer insight into their possible geographic origins. Based on our data and com- parison with similar objects of the Carolingian period, we propose that the blue-gray sapphire is of Ceylonese (Sri Lankan) origin, that the garnets originate from India or Ceylon, and that most of the emeralds are from Egypt except for one from the Habachtal deposit of Austria. The estimated weight of the center sapphire is approximately 190 ct, making it one of the largest known sapphires as of the early seventeenth century. he Talisman of Charlemagne is a sumptuous Chapelle in French) on February 28, 814 CE. Since jewel that has passed through the centuries. At the emperor did not leave specific instructions, his Tvarious times it has been said to contain frag- entourage decided to bury him in Aachen Cathedral ments of the hair of the Virgin Mary and a remnant (Minois, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • The Age of Realpolitik: 1848-1871
    AP European History: Unit 8.1 HistorySage.com The Age of Realpolitik : 1848-1871 Politics in the “Long 19 th Century”: 1789 -1914 Use space below for notes French Rev & “Age of “Age of “Age of Mass Napoleon Metternich” Realpolitik” Politics” (1789-1815) (1815-1848) (1848-1871) (1871-1914) • Nat’l • Concert of • Second • French Third Assembly Europe French Republic (1789-1791) • Revolutions of Empire • German • Legislative 1830 and • Crimean War Empire Assembly 1848 • Unification of • Imperialism (1791-1792) • Reforms in Germany • Rise of • Nat’l Britain • Unification of socialist • Convention Liberalism/ Italy parties (1792-1795) Nationalism • Ausgleich: • Increased • Directory vs. Austro- suffrage = (1795-1799) Conservatism Hungarian mass politics • Consulate • Romanticism Empire (1799-1804) • Empire (1804-1815) Main Theme: Nationalism became a dominant force in Western society after 1850. I. Failure of the Revolutions of 1848 A. Germany 1. Nationalists and liberals of the Frankfurt Parliament failed to get the support of Prussian king Frederick William IV for a unified Germany • Frederick William refused to “accept the crown from the gutter” and instead claimed “divine right” 2. “Humiliation of Olmutz”: Frederick William IV proposed a plan for German unity. a. Austria would accept a plan for German unity only if Prussia accepted the leadership of the German Bund (which Austria dominated) b. Prussia could not accept its loss of sovereignty and stepped back HistorySage.com AP Euro Lecture Notes Page 2 Unit 8.1: Age of Realpolitik (1848-1871) B. Italy Use space below for 1. Austrian forces were driven out of northern Italy notes while French forces were removed from southern Italy and Sicily.
    [Show full text]
  • Flags and Banners
    Flags and Banners A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton Contents 1 Flag 1 1.1 History ................................................. 2 1.2 National flags ............................................. 4 1.2.1 Civil flags ........................................... 8 1.2.2 War flags ........................................... 8 1.2.3 International flags ....................................... 8 1.3 At sea ................................................. 8 1.4 Shapes and designs .......................................... 9 1.4.1 Vertical flags ......................................... 12 1.5 Religious flags ............................................. 13 1.6 Linguistic flags ............................................. 13 1.7 In sports ................................................ 16 1.8 Diplomatic flags ............................................ 18 1.9 In politics ............................................... 18 1.10 Vehicle flags .............................................. 18 1.11 Swimming flags ............................................ 19 1.12 Railway flags .............................................. 20 1.13 Flagpoles ............................................... 21 1.13.1 Record heights ........................................ 21 1.13.2 Design ............................................. 21 1.14 Hoisting the flag ............................................ 21 1.15 Flags and communication ....................................... 21 1.16 Flapping ................................................ 23 1.17 See also ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • “I Should Like to Say a Word Or Two About Your Empire”: Victor Hugo Le Grand, Napoléon III Le Petit, and the Historiographi
    Portland State University PDXScholar Young Historians Conference Young Historians Conference 2019 May 1st, 9:00 AM - 10:15 AM “I Should Like to Say a Word or Two About Your Empire”: Victor Hugo le Grand, Napoléon III le Petit, and the Historiographical Battlefield of the rF ench Second Empire Madeleine Adriance St. Mary's Academy Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians Part of the European History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Adriance, Madeleine, "“I Should Like to Say a Word or Two About Your Empire”: Victor Hugo le Grand, Napoléon III le Petit, and the Historiographical Battlefield of the rF ench Second Empire" (2019). Young Historians Conference. 22. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians/2019/oralpres/22 This Event is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Young Historians Conference by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. 1 “I Should Like to Say a Word or Two About Your Empire”1: Victor Hugo le Grand, Napoléon III le Petit, and the Historiographical Battlefield of the French Second Empire Madeleine Adriance Mr. Vannelli PSU Honors History of Modern Europe, Block 2 17 March, 2019 1 Said by Victor Hugo at the National Assembly in 1851. Quoted in D’Ambès, Baron, Intimate Memoirs of ​ ​ Napoleon III: Personal Reminiscences of the Man and the Emperor, ed. and trans. A. R. Allinson (London: Stanley ​ Paul & Co., 1912), 259. 2 The lapping of waves, the soft calls of seabirds, and the cool breeze buffeting patches of wildflowers are sounds typically uncommon to the battlefield.
    [Show full text]
  • The Waterloo Campaign, 15вЇ•Œ18 June, 1815 (The Sharpe
    Sharpe’s Waterloo: The Waterloo Campaign, 15–18 June, 1815 (The Sharpe Series, Book 20), Bernard Cornwell, HarperCollins UK, 2009, 0007338767, 9780007338764, 448 pages. Lieutenant-Colonel Sharpe, sidelined on the Royal staff, magnificently siezes command at the final moment of the great victory. It is 1815. Sharpe is serving on the personal staff of the Prince of Orange, who refuses to listen to Sharpe’s reports of an enormous army, led by Napoleon, marching towards them. The Battle of Waterloo commences and it seems as if Sharpe must stand by and watch the grandest scale of military folly. But at the height of battle, as victory seems impossible, Sharpe takes command and the most hard-fought and bloody battle of his career becomes his most magnificent triumph. Soldier, hero, rogue – Sharpe is the man you always want on your side. Born in poverty, he joined the army to escape jail and climbed the ranks by sheer brutal courage. He knows no other family than the regiment of the 95th Rifles whose green jacket he proudly wears.. DOWNLOAD HERE Keeper of the Forest , Scott J. Patterson, May 1, 2007, , 228 pages. Somewhere in a small community located in the Rocky Mountains, John, a construction worker trying to make ends meet and provide a Christmas for his wife and children, is .... Sharpe's Trafalgar , Bernard Cornwell, Mar 17, 2009, Fiction, 320 pages. The year is 1805, and the Calliope, with Richard Sharpe aboard, is captured by a formidable French warship, the Revenant, which has been terrorizing British nautical traffic in ...
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Predatory Welfare State and Citizen Welfare: the French Case Philippe Batifoulier, Nicolas Da Silva, Mehrdad Vahabi
    A theory of predatory welfare state and citizen welfare: the French case Philippe Batifoulier, Nicolas da Silva, Mehrdad Vahabi To cite this version: Philippe Batifoulier, Nicolas da Silva, Mehrdad Vahabi. A theory of predatory welfare state and citizen welfare: the French case. 2019. hal-02073247 HAL Id: hal-02073247 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02073247 Preprint submitted on 19 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Centre d’économie de l’Université Paris Nord CEPN CNRS UMR n° 7234 Document de travail N° 2019-03 Axe : Santé Société et Migrations A theory of predatory welfare state and citizen welfare: the French case Philippe Batifoulier, Nicolas Da Silva, and Mehrdad Vahabi, CEPN, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité March 2019 Abstract: In this paper, we argue that the welfare state is an outcome of modern mass (total) warfare. The total war economy requires the participation of all citizens, erasing the difference between the military and citizens. Consequently, the war economy benefits from supporting the civilian population. The total war effect explains why a predatory state undertakes welfare programs. This is one of the contributions of the present paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Text Labels
    Large Text Labels George IV Art & Spectacle 1 Welcome to the Chambers Gallery The label text follows the order in which works are displayed in the gallery. Please ask a warden for assistance if you have any difficulty. 2 George IV (1762–1830) had a lifelong fascination with art and architecture and formed one of the greatest collections of paintings and decorative arts in Europe. The eldest child of George III and Queen Charlotte, George was clever and wilful, and railed against his parents’ authority. As a young man he became known for his mistresses, drinking and his dandyish clothes. Satirists issued prints which criticised his lifestyle, and his exploits were recounted with horror in newspapers. In 1811, when his father became unable to rule through mental illness, George was appointed Prince Regent. He became King on his father’s death in 1820. He was an unpopular monarch, whose lavish lifestyle was out of touch with a country suffering from economic hardship and political turmoil. 3 George’s collection of art furnished his residences, which themselves were masterpieces designed by leading architects. His carefully choreographed spectacles displayed the magnificence of monarchy, chief among them his coronation. George’s purchases remain some of the greatest works in the Royal Collection. His architectural vision created the palaces in London and Windsor still used today. William Heath, All the World’s a Stage, and one man in his time plays many parts, 1824 © Royal Pavilion & Museums, Brighton & Hove 4 Robert Seymour (1798–1836) The Great Joss and his Playthings c.1829 Etching with hand colouring Seymour’s satirical print was made at the end of George’s life to criticise his extravagant expenditure and love of ‘oriental’-style art and architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Hosehold Cavalry
    Changing the Guard, Guarding the Change of History 1. INTRODUCTION The Queen's Guard and Queen's Life Guard are the names given to contingents of cavalry and infantry soldiers charged with guarding the official royal residences in London. The British Army has had regiments of both Horse Guards and Foot Guards since before the restoration of King Charles II, and, since 1660, these have been responsible for guarding the Sovereign Palaces. The Queen's Guard and Queen's Life Guard is mounted at the royal residences which come under the operating area of London District, which is responsible for the administration of the Household Division; this covers Buckingham Palace, St James's Palace and the Tower of London, as well as Windsor Castle. The Queen's Guard is also mounted at the sovereign's other official residence, the Palace of Holyroodhouse, but not as regularly as in London. In Edinburgh, the guard is the responsibility of the resident infantry battalion at Redford Barracks. It is not mounted at the Queen's private residences at Sandringham or Balmoral. The Queen's Guard is the name given to the contingent of infantry responsible for guarding Buckingham Palace and St. James's Palace (including Clarence House) in London. The guard is made up of a company of soldiers from a single regiment, which is split in two, providing a detachment for Buckingham Palace and a detachment for St James's Palace. Because the Sovereign's official residence is still St James's, the guard commander (called the 'Captain of the Guard') is based there, as are the regiment's colours.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of a Man Nationalism, Identity, Vercingetorix and the Gauls
    University of Dayton eCommons Honors Theses University Honors Program 5-1-2021 Construction of a Man Nationalism, Identity, Vercingetorix and the Gauls Martin B. McKew University of Dayton Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses Part of the History Commons eCommons Citation McKew, Martin B., "Construction of a Man Nationalism, Identity, Vercingetorix and the Gauls" (2021). Honors Theses. 326. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses/326 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University Honors Program at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Construction of a Man Nationalism, Identity, Vercingetorix and the Gauls Honors Thesis Martin McKew Department: History Advisor: Dorian Borbonus, Ph.D. April 2021 Construction of a Man Nationalism, Identity, Vercingetorix and the Gauls Honors Thesis Martin McKew Department: History Advisor: Dorian Borbonus, Ph.D. April 2021 Abstract This paper intends to explore the past representations of Vercingetorix and the Gauls as defined by Julius Caesar and connect them to significant French events throughout the long nineteenth and twentieth centuries in order to establish a link between the Gauls, French nationalism, and French identity. Acknowledgements Great thanks to my parents and roommates for putting up with this extensive project, to Dr. Darrow for his encouragement to undertake the Honors Thesis in the first place, to Dr. Work and Dr. Sextro for their support, and especially to my Thesis Advisor, Dr. Borbonus, for his constant constructive criticism and suggestions which have undoubtedly strengthened both this paper, and my writing overall.
    [Show full text]
  • Napoleonic Wars Communication Game
    Napoleonic Wars Communication Game This game is about the difficulties of communicating information on the battlefield. A successful military strategy is completely dependent on conveying information to the right people at the right time. Without this, troops cannot be coordinated successfully, and generals cannot strategise. For a message to travel quickly every one of these links in the chain must successfully convey a message to the next. In the pages that follow you will find 7 characters, each representing a rank in the chain of command. Will your message reach its destination? SPY/SCOUT Lieutenant-Colonel Colquhoun Grant I am a spy, but not a spy like we think of them today. I always ride in full uniform including when I am behind enemy lines! Before the Battle of Waterloo, I worked in France sending reports about Napoleon's strengths and weaknesses but I managed to return to Belgium to fight on the day of the Battle of Waterloo! I get information from anyone I can. I give information to the MILITARY SECRETARY MILITARY SECRETARY Lieutenant-Colonel Lord Fitzroy Somerset I go everywhere with the Duke of Wellington, the Commander-in-Chief, as his personal secretary. If you need to get a message to Wellington you talk to me! I know everything that is going on, so when Wellington is unavailable, I pass on his messages. I get information from the SPY/SCOUT I give information to the COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF COMMANDER- IN-CHIEF Field-Marshal The Duke of Wellington I make the final decision about everything in the Battle and need to get my orders out as fast and quickly as possible.
    [Show full text]