Financing Products

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Financing Products OCTOBER 1999 ISSUE 2 FINANCING PRODUCTS ... since inception, o identify new financing tools that uals producing goods and providing Tcan help low-income entrepre- services in largely informal microenterprise neurs obtain the capital they need to economies, where traditional banking start or expand their businesses, services are not available. programs in the FIELD selected this critical issue as However, practitioners soon one of its first grant-making areas. In found that although microentrepre- U.S. have struggled June 1999, following a Request for neurs in the United States express a Applications process, five organiza- to reconcile the desire to access credit, loan demand tions were selected to receive two- in this country has been much lower year, $100,000 grants to experiment than expected. Indeed, since incep- strong desire for with new ideas and approaches for tion, microenterprise programs in the providing business capital to the poor. capital expressed U.S. have struggled to reconcile the The purpose of these grants is to strong desire for capital expressed by advance the scale and quality of the by low-income low-income entrepreneurs with the microenterprise field’s efforts to help difficulties in lending to these low- entrepreneurs with microentrepreneurs access capital. wealth, often inexperienced and often FIELD chose to invest in demonstra- risk-averse business owners. the difficulties in tion grants to microenterprise pro- The relatively slow growth in loan grams because its guiding principle is portfolios of U.S. programs has been lending to these that practice advances more rapidly documented by several sources. In when leading practitioners have the low-wealth, often 1994, for example, only one of the opportunity to test new ideas, reflect seven senior agencies included in the on the results with their peers and inexperienced and Self-Employment Learning Project share their findings with others. (SELP) made more than 85 loans.1 often risk-averse This FIELD Forum presents the rationale behind this grant cluster, 1 Elaine Edgcomb, Joyce Klein, and Peggy Clark. business owners. profiles the grantees and the projects The Practice of Microenterprise in the U.S.: Strategies, Costs, and Effectiveness. Washington they will undertake and describes plans D.C.: The Aspen Institute, 1996. for future learning from these efforts. The Issue icroenterprise development pro- Microenterprise Fund for Innovation, M grams emerged in the United Effectiveness, Learning and Dissemination States in part because of the strong experience of microfinance efforts in The Aspen Institute developing nations. These efforts One Dupont Circle, NW • Suite 700 found a strong demand for credit Washington, DC 20036 among the many low-income individ- Phone: (202) 736-1071 Fax: (202) 467-0790 email: [email protected] BUSINESS FINANCING PRODUCTS FOR THE POOR The 1996 Directory of U.S. Microenterprise • Microenterprise lenders have continually Programs 2 found that the 51 peer lending struggled to increase loan volume while programs surveyed averaged 42 loans in maintaining credit quality. Most lenders 1995, while 163 agencies providing individ- have experienced periods of high delin- ual loans averaged 29 loans in that same quency and/or staff turnover. These, in year. And, of the 28 microenterprise pro- turn, affect the rate of new originations grams funded by the Charles Stewart Mott as staff resources are diverted from serv- Foundation, more than half made fewer ing new loan clients to addressing prob- than 30 loans in 1995. Only five programs lem loans, implementing more stringent made more than 100 loans per year. borrowing and underwriting require- The relatively small numbers of loans ments to reduce delinquency, and, in made each year are mirrored in the relative- some cases, training new staff. ly small microloan portfolios held by • Peer-lending programs have faced microenterprise organizations. At the end of challenges in forming and maintaining 1995, one-third of the microenterprise pro- groups. Because in the group model, grams funded by the Mott Foundation had microentrepreneurs can only borrow less than $100,000 in outstanding loans; 89 through the group, problems with the percent had less than $500,000. The SELP peer group affect the rate of loan origi- agencies had similar experiences in 1994, nations. with average loan portfolios for the year • Perhaps most striking, programs have ranging between $156,000 and $503,000. found large numbers of clients who The small scale of loan activity among elect not to borrow — choosing only to microenterprise programs raises two concerns. receive technical assistance or training, Foremost is the issue of whether prospective or to participate in a peer group with- microentrepreneurs are receiving the financing out borrowing. Data from SELP’s 1999 they need in order to launch and operate their Directory indicates that only 11 percent businesses. of the clients of microenterprise pro- In addition, the long-term sustainability grams receive loans from the program. of microenterprise credit activities is inextri- In struggling with the challenge of low cably linked to their ability to cover at least loan demand, microenterprise programs a portion of their operating costs through explicitly targeting low-income customers interest and fee income. The level of cost have discovered certain characteristics of recovery is tied to the scale of the loan port- low-income borrowers that affect their will- folio. The programs in the U.S. that have ingness and ability to take on credit. These made the greatest strides in moving toward include: self-financing of their lending programs are • Risk-aversion. Many low-income bor- those that have achieved a significant level rowers are highly risk-averse in their of lending activity. attitudes toward borrowing. Given their There are a number of reasons for the precarious personal financial slower-than-anticipated growth of microen- situations, they often are concerned terprise loan programs in this country. They about taking on debt. Microenterprise include the following: program staff often counsel their lower- • The loan preparation and underwriting income borrowers to minimize indebt- process generally takes far longer than edness by starting their businesses on a originally envisioned. smaller scale, and by seeking ways to 2 C. Alexander Severens and Amy J. Kays, published by the Self-Employment Learning Project of the Aspen Institute in con- junction with the Association for Enterprise Opportunity. 2 reduce the need for start-up capital. • Is it best to use a While these approaches make sense for “stepped” lending individual clients, they also affect the rate at approach to deal Indeed, the industry which program loan portfolios can grow. with both the risk • Poor or no credit history. Program clients aversion and poor continues to with poor or no credit history can find credit histories of that the underwriting process is delayed, many borrowers? confront as staff or peer group members seek to Or are larger ini- understand the reasons behind the credit tial loans prefer- methodological problem and determine how that should able because small affect the decision to extend credit. loans often lead to questions about • Access to other sources of credit. Banks and small businesses other lending institutions increasingly that have difficulty how to best meet have begun marketing to small business garnering adequate market share or owners and low-income borrowers. the financing needs Increasingly, microentrepreneurs perceive generating signifi- cant enough credit cards as an alternative to microen- of low-income terprise lenders. In addition, microenter- income to support prise programs often find that their most a family? entrepreneurs. credit-worthy borrowers are able to access • Do low-income more traditional lending sources, leaving entrepreneurs really them with the riskiest and hardest-to- need access to serve borrowers. equity (or equity-like) financing, rather • Lack of equity capital. While microenter- than debt? Or does the use of equity prise lenders have long recognized the instruments potentially reinforce a “grant lack of equity among their borrowers and mentality” among people who may have have used nontraditional collateral to come to rely on welfare? secure loans, the lack of capital can be • Can microenterprise lenders effectively problematic when a microentrepreneur serve borrowers with poor credit histories? faces lower than projected sales and has What types of lending strategies work no excess resources to draw on to make well for them? loan payments. That has led practitioners • Is credit from microenterprise programs to consider the value of adding equity important or are other loan sources readily products to the range of financing available today? options they offer to customers. For a number of reasons, addressing the issue of demand for business capital among The Challenge the poor is important today. First, in-depth lthough the phenomenon of low-loan interviews conducted with microentrepre- A demand and the characteristics of low- neurs indicate that features of currently income borrowers have been acknowledged offered loan products inhibit willingness and for some time, the field clearly needs to devel- ability to borrow. Moreover, when microbusi- op more financing products and delivery sys- nesses owned by low-income entrepreneurs tems to address those issues. Indeed, the remain viable, they play a very significant role
Recommended publications
  • Shared Interest's Guarantee Fund for South Africa
    42 Community Development INVESTMENT REVIEW Unlocking Local Capital for Development: Shared Interest’s Guarantee Fund for South Africa Donna Katzin, Shared Interest Robert Rosenbloom, Strategic Philanthropy Advisors, LLC Introduction s the world grapples with growing income disparities that leave more than three billion of the planet’s people in poverty, and as the current recession shrinks the pool of public and private resources available to remedy the situation, inves- tors and policymakers across the globe are seeking high-impact, cost-effective Astrategies and tools to reduce the cavernous income and wealth gap and create bridges out of poverty.1 South Africa is a stark case in point. In 1994, when the country replaced apartheid with majority rule and elected Nelson Mandela president, South Africa was one of the most unequal nations on earth, with the preponderance of the country’s wealth concentrated in the hands of 9 percent of the population.2 Eighty-four percent of that wealth was deposited in the country’s four major banks, which by and large did not extend credit or most other banking services to blacks, who made up 80 percent of the population.3 That year, after the country transferred political power, but left economic power concen- trated in the same minority hands, Shared Interest was launched to provide U.S. inves- tors with a catalytic vehicle to help reverse apartheid’s legacy of institutionalized race-based inequality. In creating a model that would respond to South Africa’s particular conditions and needs, Shared Interest established a guarantee fund that moved highly capitalized South African banks to lend to community development financial institutions (CDFIs), coopera- tives, and emerging enterprises that, in turn, have supplied credit, affordable homes, and jobs to more than one million low-income black (including mixed race) South Africans.
    [Show full text]
  • IFC Financing to Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa Key Highlights
    IFC Financing to Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa Key Highlights IFC is working to develop solutions to close the micro, small, and $342 million for trade finance. In fiscal year 2011 alone, IFC MSME medium enterprise (MSME1) financing gap, collaborating with commitments in the region were $1,095 million. In addition, IFC’s 69 financial institutions across 23 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. microfinance institution (MFI) clients had 157,000 loans outstanding to micro-enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa by end of 2010, totaling As of June 2011, IFC committed a total of $1.8 billion to $128.3 million. Similarly, IFC’s SME financial institution (SME FI) MSME finance in Sub-Saharan Africa, $1.48 billion for long term clients had 34,000 loans outstanding to SMEs by end of 2010, finance (including $220 million for funds supporting MSMEs), and totaling $4.2 billion in this region. MSME Financial Intermediary Portfolio, June 2011 IFC’s Committed Portfolio in MSME Financial Institutions IFC’s Regional Committed Portfolio in MSME in Sub-Saharan Africa2 Financial Institutions 1,400 2% 1,200 13% Europe & Central Asia 1,000 East Asia & the Caribbeans 6% 34% s n 800 Latin America & the Caribbeans o illi Middle East & North Africa 600 M 11% South Asia 400 Sub-Saharan Africa 200 19% 15% WORLD 0 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 MSME Loans by IFC Clients, December 2010 MSME Loans by Microfinance Institutions MSME Loans by SME Financial Institutions IFC was able to survey or extrapolate outreach data from IFC was able to survey or extrapolate outreach data from 23 SME FI 17 microfinance clients in 12 countries, 53 percent of these clients clients in 12 countries, 35 percent of these clients received advisory received advisory services from IFC.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices in Collections Strategies
    Number 26 November 2008 Best Practices in Collections Strategies Past-due or non-collectible loans are part and parcel of the financial sector. As past-due rates surpass expected limits, though, this piece of the credit cycle can become a true problem. While often seen as a final step in the lending cycle, collections 1 actually plays a much more integral role in the overall process. In recent years microfinance institutions (MFIs) have sought to develop new and more effective strategies for collections. This increased attention to collections is in part due to an industry-wide emphasis on credit promotion and analysis as well as to the changing and increasingly competitive environments in which MFIs are operating. Drawing from the experiences of collections programs throughout Latin America 2 and through the implementation of initial collections activities in India that are mainly focusing on Individual lending methodology, this InSight explores “best practices” and considerations that an MFI should take into account when attempting to successfully implement collections activities. I. The Role of Collections Collections is an integral part of the credit Collections is an important service cycle. that helps to both maintain clients and free up money for lending again. It is a strategic process that is key to generating good habits and a payment culture among clients. It can also be seen as a business activity whose primary objective is to generate returns for the institution, converting losses into income. MFIs should view collections as an essential piece of the credit cycle, not just the final step. During the collections process, institutions receive feedback on policies and activities within each sub- process of the lending cycle: promotion, evaluation, approval, and disbursement.
    [Show full text]
  • Bootstrapdreams.Pdf (1.428Mb)
    CONTENTS Preface IX Abbreviations Xlll INTRODUCTION 1 Chapter 1 THE INTERNATIONAL ROOTS OF MICROENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT 19 Chapter 2 THE EMERGENCE OF U.S. MICROENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT 44 Chapter 3 CHARACTERISTICS OF U.S. MICROENTERPRISE PROGRAMS 78 (Julie Cowgill, coauthor) Chapter 4 FORMING A MICROENTERPRISE PROGRAM: CASE STUDY PART' 120 (Julie Cowgill, coauthor) Chapter 5 MATURATION OF A MICROENTERPRISE PROGRAM: CASE STUDY PART" 159 Chapter 6 CONCLUSION: MICROENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT, 201 CONTRADICTION, AND PRACTICE Notes 219 References 225 Index 245 0.. CHAPTER 1 THE INTERNATIONAL ROOTS OF MICROENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT Conventional banking institutions do not make loans to the poor, especially to rural women. The bankers I met laughed at me. -YUNus (1997) After the bank's eighteen years in business, one could estimate that conservatively half a million families were able to throw off a life of destitution and begin living with a modicum of honor and dignity as a result of intervention from the Grameen Bank. -COUNTS (1996) [T]he development community is riding the microcredit band-wagon given that it is consistent with the dominant paradigm of self-help, decentralization. and given that structural adjustment programs have forced the poor into self-employment. -McMICHAEL (2000) A major source of the excitement surrounding microenterprise develop- ment has been the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh (Ryan 1997; Brill 1999). The statement by Mohammed Yunus, the bank's founder, describes his struggle to offer microcredit in the 1970s. The second statement captures the popular acclaim surrounding the bank and the hopes for future mi- croenterprise development. Many U.S. MDPs were modeled after famous southern programs such as the Grameen (Wahid 1993a; Counts 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • A Tool to Measure Poverty
    IN THIS ISSUE: A SPECIAL FEATURE PAGE 3 B NEWS FROM AROUND THE WORLD PAGE 4 C SPOTLIGHT ON OUR SUPPORTERS PAGE 5 D VOICES FROM THE FIELD PAGE 6 FALL-WINTER // 2013-14 Income and Health and Housing and Happy Employment Environment Infrastructure Families 69 18 20 PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT A TOOL TO MEASURE POVERTY IN PARAGUAY IS ALSO HELPING Reported to be below Reported having access Reported having no the poverty threshold to drinking water in access to electricity TO ELIMINATE IT their homes BY JORDAN CORIZA Education and Organization and Interiority and Culture Participation Motivation 29 56 39 PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT Reported being unable Reported having some Reported having complete to read or write Spanish or full capacity to solve autonomy and ability to problems and conflicts make decisions Scorecard for Curuguaty, a town in eastern Paraguay, where Fundación Paraguaya is working with indigenous groups, rural residents and local business leaders to assess and eliminate poverty uruguaty is a Paraguayan town in the eastern department of Canindeyú. income, strengthen existing jobs and create new ones. The idea worked. But If you’ve heard of it – which you almost certainly haven’t – it’s probably like similar programs in Latin America, Fundación Paraguaya dedicated its early C because its population, which is poor and mostly rural, has been surveyed years to achieving financial self-sufficiency. Doing so required the adoption of and plotted on a map using Fundación Paraguaya’s color-coded ‘Poverty Stoplight,’ what some refer to as a minimalist strategy: focusing solely on providing access an innovative poverty measurement tool that has helped nearly 18,000 families to credit rather than the integrated strategy of urban and rural development overcome economic poverty since the program began in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Apr02 UR Social Exclusion
    TIONAL BA A NK RN E F T O N R I WORLD BANK R E T C N O E N M S P T O R L U E CT EV ION AND D August 2002 No.7 A regular series of notes highlighting recent lessons emerging from the operational and analytical program of the World Bank‘s Latin America and Caribbean Region BRINGING MICROFINANCE SERVICES TO THE POOR: CREDIAMIGO IN BRAZIL Susana M. Sánchez, Sophie Sirtaine, and Rita Valente Among policymakers and economists, there is a widely- micro and small enterprises. These products typically held perception that microenterprises1 face severe financ- carry very high interest rates and require collateral. ing shortages that limit their growth opportunities. Re- Banking networks also leave many areas, particularly solving the problems of access to finance as well as the poor and remote regions in the Northeast and North of high cost of financing has become the main objective of Brazil, underserved. About 57 percent of all munici- many government programs. palities in these regions have no access to a bank branch, compared to a national average of around 30 With a view to increasing access to credit for percent. Although in many other Latin American coun- microenterprises in the Northeast Region of Brazil, the tries, microfinance institutions have been able to par- World Bank has supported Banco do Nordeste’s tially fill the gap left by larger institutions, in Brazil, CrediAmigo microfinance program since 1997. This note only a small fraction of the potential demand for describes how Banco do Nordeste initiated CrediAmigo microfinance appears to be satisfied by the current as part of its restructuring strategy and how the program supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Microfinance and Technology Abstract
    Sustainable microfinance and technology Ford Motor Company Fellowship Natalie Kulik Patrice Molinari January 2004 Abstract This paper analyzes the role of technology to achieve financial sustainability and stronger impact of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs). The effects of technological solutions are assessed within the developed framework encompassing major stakeholders and industry drivers. In particular, we examine how technology can solve problems of MFIs and the microfinance industry, decrease information asymmetry between stakeholders and alleviate poverty by increasing microfinance impact and outreach. The results demonstrate that technology is only one of the determinants for MFIs’ sustainability and impact. The paper supports this argument through the analysis of industry trends, risks and opportunities and evidence from selected examples. We argue that the way forward to implement cost-effective technological solutions is a collaborative effort of stakeholders: the establishment of a global entity facilitating not only the technological development of microfinance, but also its institutional strengthening and a broader impact. Table of contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 3 1.1. Boom in Microfinance..................................................................................... 3 1.2. Social importance.......................................................................................... 3 1.3. Industry challeneges ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Principles and Practices of Microfinance Governance
    Principles and Practices of Microfinance Governance A USAID-funded project, implemented by DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES, INC. In collaboration with ACCION International, Foundation for International Community Assistance, Harvard Institute for International Development, International Management and Communications Corporation, Ohio State University Rural Finance Program, Opportunity International, and the Small Enterprise Education and Promotion Network This work was supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development, Global Bureau, Economic Growth Section, Microenterprise Development Office, through funding to the Microenterprise Best Practices (MBP) Project, contract number: PCE-0406-C-00-6004-00. Principles and Practices of Microfinance Governance by Rachel Rock Maria Otero Sonia Saltzman ACCION International August 1998 This work was supported by the U.S. Agency for International Development, Global Bureau, Economic Growth Section, Microenterprise Development Office, through funding to the Microenterprise Best Practices (MBP) Project, contract number: PCE-0406-C-00-6004-00. Rachel Rock is Director of Resource Development at ACCION International in Somerville, Massachusetts. Previously, as Director for Program Evaluation and Research, she was responsible for researching and documenting microfinance issues. Ms. Rock edited and wrote several chapters of the ACCION monograph, “From Margin to Mainstream: The Regulation and Supervision of Microfinance,” 1997. Maria Otero is the Executive Vice President of ACCION International and Director of the Washington, D.C., office. Earlier, Ms. Otero was the Director for the ACCION program in Honduras. She has written monographs and articles on a variety of subjects related to microenterprise development and is the co-editor of The New World of Microenterprise Finance: Building Healthy Financial Institutions for the Poor, published by Kumarian Press in 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Panellist Bios
    Panellist Bios ANATOL MONID Anatol is a Toronto Centre (TC) Program Director, having worked as a TC Program Leader for many years. He was previously Executive Director of the Licensing and Market Conduct Division (LMCD) of the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) which conducted supervision and regulation across many regulated sectors, including: insurance, deposit‐taking, mortgage brokering, pensions and co‐ operatives. His responsibilities included oversight of the following core regulatory activities: licensing and registration; applications and filings; monitoring and compliance; enforcement and intervention; and contributed to regulatory policy for its regulated financial sectors. LMCD also supported regulatory efforts at a national level for insurance and mortgage broking. Anatol was with FSCO for almost fifteen years, originally joining FSCO as Director of Market Regulation. At that time, he was also appointed the Insurance Ombudsman. MAYADA EL‐ZOGHBI A 20‐year veteran and leader in financial inclusion, Mayada El‐ Zoghbi became CFI’s Managing Director in September 2019. She leads the vision and strategy for CFI, building on its strong foundation of innovative, industry‐shaping work. Mayada’s experience includes serving as Lead for Strategy, Research & Development for CGAP. In that role, she led CGAP’s strategy development and its research on women’s financial inclusion, financial services in crisis environments, and other emerging topics. Prior to this, she managed CGAP’s work with the donor and investor community based in Paris, France. From 2002 to 2009, Mayada founded and managed a development consulting firm. She has also led numerous technical assistance, evaluation, and research assignments, served as a research director for a USAID initiative, and lectured at Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Accion Case Study
    Digital Frontiers Institute (DFI) 2019 Monitoring & Measurement of Results N o v e m b e r 2 0 1 9 Institution Case Study: 1 Accion International Abbreviations CIDM Certificate in Digital Money CFI Centre for Financial Inclusion CoP Community of Practice DFI Digital Frontiers Institute DFS Digital Financial Services DWC Development Works Changemakers ICT Information and communications technology MFI Microfinance institution MMR Monitoring and measurement of results MNO Mobile Network Operator SDGs UN Sustainable Development Goals SSA Sub-Saharan Africa UNCDF United Nations Capital Development Fund Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Company background and role in DFS in Sub-Saharan Africa ........................................................ 4 3. Impact of DFI courses on Accion International ............................................................................... 6 3.1 Impact on Accion Employees .................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Broader impact on the Company ............................................................................................ 8 4. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 12 5. Appendix 1 ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Is Banking for the Poor an Oxymoron? an Examination of Microfinance
    “Is Banking for the Poor an Oxymoron? An Examination of Microfinance Organizations across the Globe” Caitlin Rosser Honors Capstone Project, Spring 2011 Honors in Business Administration Kogod School of Business Bachelors of Science in Business Administration, Specializing in International Business Double Major in International Studies Professor Richard Linowes & Professor Jennifer Oetzel MGMT-458-002H Business, Policy & Strategy Rosser, “Is Banking for the Poor an Oxymoron?” 1 Table of Contents I. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………2 II. Introduction and Background……………………………………………………………..2 III. What is microfinance?…………………………………………………………………….4 IV. Challenges for the microfinance industry…………………………………………………6 V. Differing strategies of microfinance organizations………………………………………..9 VI. Comparison of strategies within the industry……………………………………………18 VII. Recommendations for the Future………………………………………………………...21 VIII. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….23 IX. Appendices……………………………………………………………………………….24 Rosser, “Is Banking for the Poor an Oxymoron?” 2 ABSTRACT The field of microfinance has developed rapidly within the past two decades, with many nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and microfinance institutions (MFIs) established in various countries throughout the world. These organizations operate under the mission of “banking for the poor,” bringing opportunity and credit for the poor to lift themselves out of poverty. However, there are many varying strategies for these organizations to take, and many different structures to
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2005 Newsletter
    Hemispheres The International Area Studies Outreach Consortium at the University of Texas at Austin Latin America, the Middle East, Russia, East Europe & Eurasia, and South Asia http://inic.utexas.edu/hemispheres [email protected] Fall 2005 Newsletter In this issue: The International Year of Microcredit. “Microcredit is a critical anti-poverty tool—a wise invest- ment in human capital. When the poorest, especially Teresa Lozano Long Institute of Latin women, receive credit, they become economic actors with American Studies power. Power to improve not only their own lives but, in a Natalie Arsenault Outreach Coordinator widening circle of impact, the lives of their families, their University of Texas at Austin communities, and their nations.” - Kofi Annan, Secretary 1 University Station D0800 Austin, Texas 78712-0331 General of the UN. Tel: 512/232-2404 Fax: 512/471-3090 On November 18, 2004, the United Nations launched the Interna- e-mail: [email protected] tional Year of Microcredit. The official definition of microcredit, adopted at the 1997 Microcredit Summit, is “the extension of Center for Middle Eastern Studies small loans to very poor people for self-employment projects that Christopher Rose Outreach Coordinator generate income, allowing them to care for themselves and their University of Texas at Austin families." Microcredit loans are extended to borrowers too poor 1 University Station F9400 to qualify for loans from the traditional banking system and do Austin, Texas 78712-0527 Tel: 512/471-3582 not require collateral. These loans are tiny in the amounts lent and Fax: 512/471-7834 saved, target very low-income households, and have flexible repay- e-mail: [email protected] ment plans.
    [Show full text]